A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the treatment of low to moderate myopia. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, control-matched study. METHODS: The charts of 2257 eyes that underwent LASEK or LASIK treatment were reviewed. Patients who were 21 years of age or older having between -0.75 and -6.00 diopters (D) of myopia with up to -2.25 D of astigmatism were included. One hundred twenty-two LASEK-treated eyes were matched with 122 LASIK-treated eyes having preoperative spheres, cylinders, and spherical equivalent (SE) within +/-0.50 D. Both groups had similar preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), laser platform, and follow-up durations. Outcome measures were visual and refractive results. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean SE was -3.50 +/- 1.40 D for LASEK and -3.50 +/- 1.42 D for LASIK (P = .59). Postoperatively, the mean logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.01 +/- 0.08 (20/21) for LASEK and 0.06 +/- 0.12 (20/23) for LASIK; the mean SE was -0.15 +/- 0.40 D for LASEK and -0.37 +/- 0.45 D for LASIK; and the mean logMAR of BSCVA was -0.03 +/- 0.06 (20/19) for LASEK and -0.02 +/- 0.05 (20/19) for LASIK. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Slight differences in the visual and refractive results between LASEK and LASIK were observed, despite the use of the same nomogram. Both procedures were safe, effective, and predictable. Nomogram adjustment may be necessary for LASIK surgeons adopting surface ablation.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

Decreased tear secretion after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia

PURPOSE: To investigate the changes in tear secretion and tear film stability after excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for high myopia. METHODS: One eye of 28 patients underwent unilateral LASIK for the correction of myopia with spherical equivalent refractions ranging from -6.37 to -18.25 D (mean, -11.98 +/- 3.45 D). Schirmer tear test values without anesthesia at 5 minutes and tear break-up time values were measured 4 weeks after LASIK. Unoperated contralateral eyes were used as a control for each patient. The Schirmer tear test and tear break-up time values were analyzed statistically using the independent t-test. RESULTS: The mean Schirmer tear test value was 16.17 +/- 2.50 mm in the operated eyes and 21.07 +/- 7.03 mm in the unoperated (control) eyes of the same patients (P = .001). The mean tear break-up time value was 21.0 +/- 3.55 seconds in the operated eyes and 21.27 +/- 6.79 seconds in the control eyes (P = .85). CONCLUSION: Tear secretion decreased following LASIK probably due to decrease in corneal sensitivity, but tear film stability appeared unaltered.     

激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术和激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗中高度近视的对比研究

目的比较激光角膜瓣下磨镶术(LASEK)和激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗中高度近视的临床效果. 方法中高度近视患者198例(394只眼).其中LASEK手术治疗93例(184只眼), LASIK手术治疗105例(210只眼). 结果术后1天,LASIK 组28 %裸眼视力达到1.0,LASEK组无1例裸眼视力达到1.0.术后1周、1、3、6月裸眼视力大于或等于1.0者,两组比较差异无显著性 (P=0.36,P=0.58,P=0.44,P=0.64).角膜地形图分析平均角膜中央屈光力与周边屈光力的差异,LASEK组(0.69)明显小于LASIK组(2.62).结论 LASEK手术矫正中高度近视均有良好的治疗效果,是一种安全、有效、预测性好的屈光手术.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with those of surface treatment by laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), photorefractive keratectomy with mechanical epithelial removal (M-PRK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). SETTING: Tertiary care eye center. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised all cases of LASIK, LASEK, M-PRK, and T-PRK performed at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005. Separate statistical analyses were performed for eyes with low to moderate myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] less than -6.00 diopters [D]) and high myopia (SE -6.00 to -11.25 D). RESULTS: Of 696 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, 464 had LASIK, 104 had LASEK, 69 had M-PRK, and 59 had T-PRK. Eyes with low to moderate myopia had a statistically significantly smaller mean difference between logMAR final postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after T-PRK and M-PRK than after LASIK or LASEK. A higher percentage of eyes with high myopia had a final UCVA within +/-2 lines of the preoperative BSCVA with T-PRK than with LASIK, LASEK, or M-PRK. There were more major non-flap-related complications after LASEK than after LASIK, M-PRK, or T-PRK. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low to moderate myopia, T-PRK and M-PRK provided slightly better visual outcomes than LASIK or LASEK. In eyes with high myopia, T-PRK provided better visual outcomes than LASIK, LASEK, and M-PRK. Laser in situ keratomileusis was associated with the most major postoperative complications.     

Comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and sensitivity between LASIK and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK)

PURPOSE: To compare changes in corneal nerve fibers and keratocyte density by confocal microscopy after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized comparative clinical trial. METHODS: Fifty-six eyes of 28 patients who underwent LASIK and 52 eyes of 26 patients who underwent LASEK were included. Confocal microscopic data of the central cornea, corneal sensitivity, tear film breakup time, and Schirmer values were determined at three and six months after LASIK or LASEK treatment. RESULTS: In the LASIK group, corneal sensitivity was reduced from preoperative levels at six months after surgery. In the LASEK group, however, there was no difference between baseline and six-month postoperative values. The number of subbasal nerve fibers and the keratocyte density were also different in the LASIK and LASEK groups. The regeneration of corneal nerves correlated strongly with the recovery of corneal sensation and keratocyte density in both groups, whereas the tear film breakup time, Schirmer values, and epithelial thickness did not correlate with corneal nerve regeneration in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The greater decrease in the number of subbasal nerve fibers in the LASIK group compared with the LASEK group may relate to the greater decrease in corneal sensitivity. The pattern of corneal nerve regeneration and the recovery of corneal sensation after LASEK did not differ greatly from that after photorefractive keratectomy in previous studies.     

矢量法分析LASEK和LASIK矫正高度散光的疗效

目的应用Thibos矢量法比较准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术（laser subepithelial keratomileusis,LASEK）和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK）矫正高度散光（≥-2．75D）的疗效。方法LASEK59例（59眼）,LASIK37例（37眼）。分析两组患者术前和术后裸眼视力（uncorrected visual acuity,UCVA）、最佳矫正视力（best corrected visual acuity,BCVA）、屈光度（S球镜,C柱镜,M等效球镜）和模糊指数B的差别。结果除LASIK组BCVA外,所有患者术前和术后UCVA、BCVA、S、M、C、B差异均有统计学意义。术后两组间S、C、M、B差异均无统计学意义,BCVA较术前无一例发生下降2行。结论LASEK和LASIK手术方式均安全、手术效果可靠,是治疗高度散光的有效方法。Thibos矢量分析能够全面地描述眼屈光异常和屈光手术疗效。     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼和屈光回退的相关性(英文)

目的:探讨准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后干眼和屈光回退的相关性。方法:近视患者225例分别在LASIK术前及术后6mo进行Schirmer试验、泪膜破裂时间、角膜知觉和角、结膜荧光素染色检查,并接受McMonnies问卷调查。综合病史及治疗效果对结果作比较分析。结果:LASIK术后干眼和屈光回退显著相关。术后发生干眼症的32例患者中8例(25.0%)同时伴有屈光回退,而未发生干眼症的193例患者中仅18例(9.3%)伴有屈光回退,差异有极显著意义(P<0.01)。结论:LASIK术后干眼患者屈光回退的危险性增加。     

Results of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -10 to -19 diopters with a Technolas 217 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia greater than -10.00 D. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes of 37 patients with myopia greater than -10.00 D underwent LASIK. Patients were evaluated on day 1, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and presence of any complication. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.745 +/- 0.234, which improved to 0.8070 +/- 0.237 postoperatively. The average preoperative UCVA was 0.022 +/- 0.02; postoperative UCVA at 6 months was 0.536 +/- 0.255. UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 58% (38 eyes) and 20/20 or better in 26% (17 eyes). The average refractive error before LASIK was -12.64 +/- 2.16 D (range -10.00 to -19.00 D). Mean residual refractive error 1 week following LASIK was -0.63 +/- 1.36 D, which regressed to a mean -1.78 +/- 2.08 D at the end of 6 months. Nineteen eyes (29%) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refractive correction. CONCLUSION: LASIK was partially effective in the correction of high myopia. An initial overcorrection may be programmed to offset the effect of refractive regression.     

Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability

OBJECTIVE: Patients frequently experience dry eye symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The mechanisms that lead to these changes are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of LASIK on tear function. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, nonrandomized interventional trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients (96 eyes) who underwent myopic LASIK treatment. METHODS: The prospective study involved 58 consecutive patients (96 eyes) who underwent sequential or bilateral LASIK for the correction of myopia. Dry eye symptoms, standardized Schirmer test values, basal tear secretion test, and tear break-up time were measured before surgery and 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Schirmer test value, basal tear secretion value, and tear break-up time. RESULTS: Before surgery, 15.6% of patients (15/96) had dry eye symptoms. After surgery, 94.8% of patients (91/96), 85.4% of patients (82/96), and 59.4% of patients (57/96) experienced dry eye symptoms at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month, respectively. Schirmer test value (13.32 +/- 10. 67 mm) increased at 1 day (14.48 +/- 10.57 mm; P = 0.25) and subsequently decreased at 1 week (11.18 +/- 9.81 mm; P = 0.05) and at 1 month (10.83 +/- 10.02 mm; P = 0.03). Basal tear secretion test value (8.49 +/- 8.48 mm) decreased at 1 day (6.80 +/- 6.48 mm; P = 0.05), at 1 week (5.97 +/- 6.88 mm; P = 0.005), and at 1 month (5.89 +/- 6.24 mm; P = 0.007). Tear break-up time (5.32 +/- 2.35 seconds) decreased 1 day (4.14 +/- 1.90 seconds; P < 0.001) and 1 week (4.49 +/- 1.70 seconds; P = 0.004) after surgery and recovered by 1 month after surgery (5.09 +/- 3.03 seconds; P = 0.52). Poor preoperative tear functions with a Schirmer test value less than 10 mm was a significant risk factor (72% vs. 46%; relative risk, 1.58 [1.10-2.26]) for experiencing dry eye symptoms at 1 month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Dry eye symptoms are common after myopic LASIK surgery. Laser in situ keratomileusis significantly altered the tear break-up time, Schirmer test values, and basal tear secretion. Patients with preexisting tear flow abnormality as demonstrated by Schirmer test values less than 10 mm are especially at risk of experiencing dry eye symptoms.     

Nomogram adjustment of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the Alcon LADARVision system

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of conventional (non-wavefront) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser system and nomogram adjustment techniques. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 499 eyes that had LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism was performed. Preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction ranged from -0.43 to -6.00 D and preoperative astigmatism ranged from 0 to -4.75 D. Patients were evaluated during 3 months following surgery. RESULTS: One month after surgery, 72% of eyes examined (298/415 eyes) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better. Three months after surgery, 83% of eyes examined (216/261 eyes) had UCVA of 20/20 or better. One and three months after surgery, 82% and 83% of eyes, respectively, were within +/-0.50 D of attempted correction; 97% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D at both 1 and 3 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 months after surgery. At the 3-month examination, 83% of eyes had UCVA better than or equal to preoperative BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional LASIK to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism was safe and effective using the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser system. Outcomes were substantially improved throughout development of an accurate nomogram, derived from continually updated regression analysis of previous refractive results.     

Dry eye after LASIK for myopia: Incidence and risk factors

PURPOSE: Patients frequently experience dry eye symptoms after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of dry eye after myopic LASIK. METHODS: In this retrospective case series 190 eyes that underwent LASIK were examined for a dry eye syndrome. All patents were asymptomatic for dry eyes before surgery. Assessments included subjective complaints of dry eye, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining, corneal sensitivity test, and Schirmer I test. All values were compared before and at 1 week and 1.3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: For the 190 eyes, chronic dry eye persisting 6 months or more after LASIK was diagnosed in 20 percent of the eyes. Mean patient age was 31 +/- 8 years. The risk for chronic dry eye was significantly associated with higher attempted refractive correction, greater ablation depth, and female sex (p=0.001). Subjective score for dryness was increased after LASIK. The greatest change from preoperative levels for all parameters was noted at 1 week. There were obvious decreases in TBUT and Schirmer value at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively relative to preoperative level (p<0.05). The Schirmer I test result was higher at 1 day but without statistical significance (p>0.05), but lower at 1 week and 3 and 6 months (p<0.05) after LASIK. Corneal sensitivity was decreased at 1 month and 3 months, and returned to the preoperative level at 6 months after LASIK. There was a statistically significant effect of age, sex, and mean spherical equivalent refraction on corneal sensitivity (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LASIK for myopia develop dry eye with compromised tear function at least 6 months after surgery. Women and patients requiring higher refractive correction have an increased risk for developing dry eye.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光上皮下磨镶术矫正高度近视的视觉质量对比研究

目的 从视觉质量的角度评价准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（LASIK）和准分子激光上皮下磨镶术（LASEK）矫正高度近视的疗效。方法对34人（68眼）进行LASIK或LASEK手术的高度近视患者（其中LASEK19人38眼，LASIK组15人30眼）术前，术后1月和术后3月时评价视觉质量，包括术后裸眼视力（UCVA），最佳矫正视组（BCVA组），对比敏感度，眩光和波前像差。结果 LASEK组UCVA提高较LASIK组慢。LASEK和LASIK的术后IN2VA无差异。LASEK组术后的对比敏感度无下降；眩光在术后1月时下降，术后3月时恢复至术前水平。LASIK组术后1月时对比敏感度和眩光均明显下降，术后3月时对比敏感度恢复但眩光仍未恢复至术前水平。LASEK组和LASIK组术后1月和3月的高阶像差RMS均较术前大，但前者比后者小。LASEK组有一定的haze发生，但程度轻。结论 LASEK矫正高度近视能获得更好的视觉质量，关键在于如何更好的保留上皮瓣的活力。     

非球面切削LASEK治疗薄角膜高度近视的临床疗效研究

目的 探讨角膜波前像差引导联合Q值优化的最优个性化角膜屈光矫正程序(ORK-CAM)引导的非球面切削准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗角膜薄的高度近视临床疗效.方法 运用角膜波前像差引导联合Q值优化的ORK-CAM及小光斑高速飞点激光扫描系统对49例76只眼角膜薄的高度近视患者行LASEK.术后2周,1月,3及6月检查裸眼视力、验光、Haze等级.术后半年时复查角膜地形图、波前像差、视觉对比敏感度并进行满意度调查.结果 术前平均最佳眼镜矫正视力(BSCVA)为1.10+0.12,术后6月BUCVA(BUCVA)为1.12+0.17.术后平均模拟角膜记读数(SimK)等效值、慧差、球差、总体像差分别增加了-13.5%、93.87%、172.22%、23.81%、43.28%,较术前差异有统计学意义.角膜地形图形态有92.11%为同心圆型,视觉质量满意度为95.92%.结论 角膜波前像差引导的LASEK治疗角膜薄的高度近视,术后3个月以后平均视力稳定,且好于术前BCVA.术后6月时平均总波前像差增加百分比较小,球差增加较少,较好的保持了角膜的的非球面性.术后患者出现眩光、夜视力差的机率较低,具有较好的临床疗效.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis have postoperative dry eye. METHODS: In this retrospective, interventional case series, 124 eyes of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis were examined for a dry eye symptom, Schirmer test with anesthesia, tear clearance rate, tear break-up time, vital staining for ocular surface, corneal sensitivity, and blink rate. All values were compared before and after surgery (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year) and values of P <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Subjective score for dryness was increased after laser in situ keratomileusis. Tear function index (Schirmer value/tear clearance rate) and break-up time were decreased until 1 month (tear function index) and 3 months (break-up time) after laser in situ keratomileusis but recovered to preoperative levels thereafter. Fluorescein and rose bengal scores were unchanged at all follow-up points except for improvement of the rose bengal score at 6 months. Corneal sensitivity was decreased at 1 month and 3 months, and returned to the preoperative level at 6 months after laser in situ keratomileusis. Blink rate was decreased at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after laser in situ keratomileusis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis develop dry eye with compromised tear function for at least 1 month after surgery. Use of artificial tears in the early postoperative period may help to prevent unwanted symptoms and ocular surface damage.     

LASEK与LASIK治疗高度近视

目的:对比观察准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨削术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨削术(LASIK)治疗高度近视的临床疗效。评估2种手术的安全性和有效性。方法:对行LASEK治疗的39例75只眼和同期行LASIK治疗的41例79只眼高度近视分别进行6个月以上的临床观察。结果:LASEK组术后1周至1个月达最佳矫正视力,术后3个月部分出现视力回退,术后6个月裸眼视力达术前矫正视力占95.83%,主要并发症有术后高眼压及Haze形成;LASIK组术后6个月裸眼视力达术前矫正视力占94.35%,主要并发症为屈光回退,角膜上皮内生或角膜瓣皱折等。结论:LASIK与LASEK均能安全、有效地矫正高度近视。     

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), a modified photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) technique, with those of conventional PRK for low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: In this prospective study, 27 patients with a manifest refraction of -3.00 to -6.50 diopters were treated and followed for 3 months. In each case, PRK was performed in 1 eye and LASEK in the other eye. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Postoperative pain, epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, corneal haze, and surgical preference were examined in PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: During the 3 month follow-up, there were no significant between-eye differences in epithelial healing time, UCVA, or refractive error. However, LASEK-treated eyes had lower postoperative pain scores (P =.047) and corneal haze scores (1 month; P =.02) than PRK-treated eyes. Seventeen patients (63%) preferred the LASEK procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laser epithelial keratomileusis safely and effectively treated eyes with low to moderate myopia. It reduced the incidence of significant postoperative pain and corneal haze and may prevent the flap- and interface-related problems of laser in situ keratomileusis.     

Tear secretion following excimer laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on tear secretion. METHODS: A non-consecutive series of 42 eyes of 42 patients had LASIK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. The fellow eye served as a control. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -5.25 +/- 1.00 D (range, -1.75 to -11.00 D). Attempted correction aimed at emmetropia. Schirmer I and II, and tear break-up time (BUT) tests were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. All tests were correlated to the amount of the attempted correction. RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean values were Schirmer I: 16.2 mm, Schirmer II: 11.6 mm, and BUT: 16.3 sec. One month after LASIK, mean values were Schirmer I: 12.8 mm, Schirmer II: 9.2 mm, and BUT: 13.3 sec. At 3 months, mean values were Schirmer I: 15.76 mm, Schirmer II: 11.3 mm, and BUT: 14.15 sec. At 6 months, mean values were Schirmer I: 15.96 mm, Schirmer II: 11.66 mm, and BUT: 16.3 sec. No correlation to the amount of attempted correction was found. Fellow eye tests were not affected at any interval. CONCLUSIONS: Tear secretion following LASIK was decreased during 3 months after surgery and was normalized by 6 months.