服用复方聚乙二醇电解质散进行肠道准备的舒适度研究进展

检索采用复方聚乙二醇电解质散进行肠道准备的舒适度研究的相关文章,就服用复方聚乙二醇电解质散进行肠道准备期间影响患者舒适度的相关因素及干预措施进行综述,患者肠道准备期间不舒适因素包括一次性口服液体量大、药物口感与气味差、排便次数多及睡眠质量差等。临床可采用联合用药、探索肠道准备新方案、改善药物口感、咀嚼口香糖、运动干预、加强健康教育等方式提升患者舒适感。     

复方聚乙二醇电解质散与硫酸镁在结肠镜检查病人肠道准备中的应用效果

[目的]探讨硫酸镁与复方聚乙二醇电解质散(PEG)两种泻药在结肠镜检查肠道准备中应用的效果。[方法]选择2015年1月—2015年6月住院行结肠镜检查的407例病人,将2015年1月—2015年3月住院行结肠镜检查的196例病人作为对照组,将2015年4月—2015年6月住院行结肠镜检查的211例病人作为观察组,对照组肠道准备采用硫酸镁口服,观察组肠道准备采用复方聚乙二醇电解质散口服,比较两组病人的肠道准备清洁度、不良反应发生率、服药依从性及病人满意度。[结果]观察组肠道准备清洁合格率、病人依从性及满意度高于对照组,肠道准备不良反应发生率低于对照组,经比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。[结论]复方聚乙二醇电解质散用于结肠镜检查病人行肠道准备,肠道清洁度好,不良反应发生率低,病人依从性及满意度高,效果明显优于口服硫酸镁。     

复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合开塞露灌肠在痔上黏膜环切术患者肠道准备中的应用

目的观察口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合开塞露灌肠法在痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)术前肠道准备中的应用效果。方法选取2016年6月至2017年12月于我院行PPH术的患者60例作为研究对象,将其随机等分为观察组与对照组,对照组患者于术前晚分次口服复方聚乙二醇电解质溶液2000 ml;观察组患者在此基础上于术晨联合开塞露40 ml灌肠。比较两组患者肠道清洁度、肠道准备后排便情况、耐受度、不良反应情况。结果观察组患者肠道准备后肠道清洁度及排便次数明显优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者排空大便时间、耐受度、不良反应情况比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散联合开塞露灌肠法的肠道准备效果优于单纯口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散法,值得临床推广。     

复方聚乙二醇电解质散在妇科手术病人术前肠道准备中的应用

[目的]观察复方聚乙二醇电解质散在妇科手术病人术前肠道准备中的应用效果,探讨其护理措施。[方法]将150例妇科择期手术病人随机分为两组,观察组78例应用复方聚乙二醇电解质散进行术前肠道清洁准备,对照组72例口服硫酸镁及常规灌肠。比较两组病人肠道清洁度、肠道清洁过程中不良反应发生情况。[结果]观察组病人肠道清洁度优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组病人肠道清洁过程中发生不良反应为8.9 7%,对照组为19.44%,观察组明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。[结论]复方聚乙二醇电解质散用于妇科手术病人术前肠道清洁效果优于口服硫酸镁及常规灌肠,且不良反应少。     

复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠代食管术患者术前肠道准备中的应用

[目的]探讨复方聚乙醇电解质散应用于结肠代食管术术前肠道准备的临床效果.[方法]选择本院拟行结肠代食管术患者106例为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,各53例.对照组给予硫酸镁口服行肠道准备,观察组给予复方聚乙二醇电解质散行肠道准备,比较两组肠道清洁度、不良反应、并发症、患者满意度.[结果]观察组患者左半结肠、横结肠、右半结肠、整个肠腔清洁度评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05).观察组患者腹胀等不良反应总发生率为18.87％(10/53),明显低于对照组的43.40％(23/53)(P<0.05);观察组患者切口感染等并发症总发生率为11.32％(6/53),明显低于对照组的28.30％(15/53),且差异有显著性(P<0.05).观察组患者满意度为96.23％(51/53),明显高于对照组的84.91％(45/53),且差异有显著性(P<0.05).[结论]复方聚乙醇电解质散行肠道准备有助于提高结肠代食管术患者肠道清洁度,减少并发症及不良反应发生率,提高患者满意度.     

运动干预联合咀嚼口香糖在结肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用研究

目的探讨运动干预联合咀嚼口香糖对服用复方聚乙二醇电解质散(PEG)进行肠道准备患者的肠道准备质量及不良反应的影响。方法选取2017年6月—2018年6月在我院消化内镜室行结肠镜检查前肠道准备的患者300例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为联合组、口香糖组和对照组,各100例。对照组在检查当日提前4～6 h服用PEG等渗溶液2 000 mL,每10 min服用250 mL,2 h内服完,并嘱患者多运动;口香糖组在对照组基础上按要求每服用250 mL,咀嚼无糖口香糖1粒,持续10 min,共8颗;联合组在口香糖组基础上在嚼口香糖同时持续步行10 min,速度达到50步/min及以上。采用Boston量表评价3组患者的肠道清洁度,记录患者首次排便及大便排空时间,记录操作时间及不良反应发生情况。结果共291例患者完成研究,联合组右半结肠、横结肠、左半结肠BBPS评分、BBPS总分及祛泡效果评分均高于口香糖组及对照组(P<0.05);联合组首次排便时间、大便排空时间、插镜时间短于口香糖组及对照组(P<0.05);联合组及口香糖组恶心、呕吐、腹胀发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)...     

术前复方聚乙二醇电解质散+改良开塞露灌肠对RPH手术患者肠道准备的影响

目的:探讨术前复方聚乙二醇电解质散+改良开塞露灌肠对自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)治疗患者肠道准备的影响。方法:选择2019年4月1日～2020年7月31日就诊的86例RPH手术患者按信封法分为观察组和对照组各43例;对照组常规于术前口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散作为清肠准备,观察组在对照组基础上联合改良开塞露灌肠作为术前准备;比较两组肠道清洁度、术前排便次数、术后首次排气和排便时间、肠道准备依从性和耐受度、不良反应发生率。结果:两组肠道清洁度、排便次数、排气和排便时间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),两组肠道准备依从性和耐受度、不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:RPH术前使用复方聚乙二醇电解质散+改良开塞露灌肠,肠道清洁效果好,有利于促进患者排便排气,对患者肠道准备依从性和耐受度影响较小,未增加不良反应发生风险。     

结肠镜检查前两种清洁剂肠道准备效果比较

目的 比较口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散法与口服硫酸镁法对结肠镜检查前肠道清洁的效果及不良反应.方法 将120例结肠镜检查的患者随机分为观察组和对照组, 肠道准备观察组采用口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散,对照组口服硫酸镁.比较两组肠道清洁度及患者的耐受度.结果 两组肠道清洁效果均满意,比较差异无统计学意义;患者耐受性观察组显著高于对照组.口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散法较口服硫酸镁法不良反应轻,准备时间短.结论 口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散法肠道清洁效果好,患者耐受性高,安全有效,有广阔的临床应用前景.     

两种结肠镜检查肠道准备方法的比较

目的比较聚乙二醇电解质散(和爽)与甘露醇对结肠镜检查前肠道清洁效果。方法将120例接受结肠镜检查的患者随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组口服聚乙二醇电解质散(和爽)进行肠道准备,对照组口服20%甘露醇进行肠道准备,以问卷法和观察法收集资料,比较两种方法肠道清洁的效果。结果观察组肠道准备清洁度总体有效率高于对照组,二者差异有统计学意义(P0.05),聚乙二醇电解质散法不良反应轻,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论聚乙二醇电解质散肠道清洁效果满意,患者不良反应轻,准备时间短,护理方便,更适合门诊患者,是较好的结肠镜检查前肠道准备方法。     

两种肠道清洁方法在妇科术前肠道准备中的应用效果观察

[目的]探讨两种肠道清洁方法在妇科术前肠道准备的效果。[方法]160例妇科术前病人随机分为观察组和对照组各80例,对照组采用传统的灌肠法,观察组采用口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散清洁肠道法,比较两种肠道清洁方法在术前肠道准备的效果、病人舒适度。[结果]观察组与对照组术前肠道准备的效果、舒适度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]采用口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散清洁肠道法能有效清洁肠道,减少术后并发症,增加病人舒适度,减轻护士的工作量。     

复方聚乙二醇电解质散服药时间对结肠镜检查前肠道清洁的作用

目的探讨不同时间口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散（恒康正清）进行肠道准备对结肠清洁作用的影响。方法结肠镜检查患者120例随机分为3组：A组36例,术前12小时服药,上午检查;B组44例,术前4小时服药,上午检查;C组40例,术前4小时服药,下午检查。比较3组肠道清洁度、清洁范围及患者的评价。结果结肠清洁度I级A组（5．5％）显著低于B组（90．9％）及C组（75．0％）（P〈0．05）。肠道清洁范围4度A组（16．7％）显著低于B组（86．4％）及C组（70．0％）（P〈0．05）。患者耐受性A组（72．2％）显著低于B组（95．2％）和C组（90．0％）（P〈0．05）。结论采用检查前4小时快速口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散3盒,具有肠道清洁满意、患者耐受性高的效果。     

Virtual colonoscopy: The endoscopist''s point of view

The major advantage of virtual colonoscopy is that it might increase acceptance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Its disadvantages are high costs and unknown sensitivity and specificity if widely applied. It might replace colonoscopy to a substantial degree only if no bowel preparation is necessary. Gastroenterologists have to include virtual colonoscopy as a complementary method to colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy may increase the ratio of therapeutic colonoscopies compared with simple "diagnostic" procedures.     

150名护士无痛结肠镜检查认知状况分析与对策

目的:了解护士对无痛肠镜检查的认知程度,对存在问题进行改进,保证肠道检查的安全性。方法:自制问卷了解我院150名护士对无痛肠镜检查知识的认知。结果:护士对无痛肠镜检查知识的知晓率为34.67%~98.67%。结论:护士对无痛肠镜检查的相关知识没有充分认识,应加大对全院护士进行系统培训,提高护士无痛肠镜检查认知的水平;在内镜中心候诊室的显眼处设立图文并茂、通俗易懂的宣传栏;落实检查前宣教工作和遵医行为,规范检查护理。     

二氧化碳减轻结肠镜检查术后腹痛的临床研究

目的：探讨二氧化碳（CO2）作为结肠镜检查膨胀气体对患者舒适度的影响及安全性。方法：选取江西省宜春市人民医院门诊及住院行结肠镜检查患者200例,分成4组：普通肠镜组、无痛肠镜组、CO2肠镜组、CO2无痛肠镜组,每组50例。前两组以空气作为膨胀气体,后两组以CO2作为膨胀气体,分别行肠镜检查。记录每组患者肠镜检查前、检查过程中及检查后的动脉血CO2分压;肠镜检查后1h摄片观察结肠膨胀程度;肠镜检查中、检查后1h、6h和24h患者的腹痛程度和腹胀程度。结果：CO2肠镜组及CO2无痛肠镜组检查前、检查中及检查后血CO2分压无明显改变（P〉0．05）,与以空气作为膨胀气体的普通肠镜组及无痛肠镜组比较,均无明显差异（P〉0．05）;而检查过程中CO2肠镜组患者腹胀、腹痛明显轻于普通肠镜组（P〈0．05）,采用CO2的2组检查后1h和6h的腹胀、腹痛程度以及1h后结肠膨胀程度均明显轻于空气作为膨胀气体普通肠镜组及无痛肠镜组（P〈0．05）。结论：CO2作为肠镜检查膨胀气体,能明显减轻患者结肠镜检查的痛苦,且具有很好的安全性。     

色素放大肠镜与普通电子肠镜诊断结肠微小肿瘤性病变的价值比较

目的比较普通电子结肠镜与色素放大内镜（FICE系统）对结肠粘膜微小肿瘤样病变的检出率,分析FICE系统在临床诊断中的使用价值。方法对2006年10月-2009年9月期间随机行普通电子结肠镜检查与FICE系统检查的结果进行回顾分析,以病理组织学诊断为标准,比较两种检查对微小肿瘤检出的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果剔除直径〉5 mm肿瘤性病变患者,与病理组织学诊断比较,普通结肠镜诊断结肠粘膜诊断肿瘤性和非肿瘤性病变的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值依次为68.0%、97.1%、78.0%和95.2%;FICE系统的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值依次为87.9%、97.4%、89.9%和96.8%,其中灵敏度及阳性预测值显著高于普通结肠内镜检查结果 （P〈0.05）。结论 FICE系统较普通电子结肠镜对结肠微小肿瘤的检出具有更加良好的临床应用价值。     

改良“轴保持短缩法”单人操作结肠镜在结肠术后患者检查中的临床应用

目的:探讨改良"轴保持短缩法"单人操作结肠镜在结肠术后患者检查中的临床应用。方法:对2009年4-12月来我院消化内镜中心进行随访的512例结肠术后患者,分别应用改良"轴保持短缩法"单人操作法以及常规单人操作结肠镜进行检查,对两种方法的成功率、进镜时间、疼痛评分等指标进行比较。结果:常规单人操作结肠镜和改良"轴保持短缩法"单人操作结肠镜到达回盲部(或结肠-小肠吻合口)的成功率分别为93.8%和99.1%。常规单人操作结肠镜检查和改良"轴保持短缩法"单人操作结肠镜的平均进镜时间分别为7.6min和3.5min(P<0.05)。常规单人操作结肠镜和改良"轴保持短缩法"单人操作结肠镜检查后,采用数字评定量表(NRS)评定疼痛程度的平均分数分别为6.7分和3.8分(P<0.05)。全部检查无并发症发生。结论:改良"轴保持短缩法"单人操作结肠镜对结肠术后患者的检查安全、成功率高,与常规单人操作结肠镜相比,进镜时间短、患者疼痛程度轻。     

Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions

Background The purpose of our study was to determine the usefulness of a virtual computed tomography colon dissection visualization technique for the detection of polypoid lesions in comparison with conventional virtual colonoscopy analysis and optical colonoscopy. Methods Twenty-three patients were evaluated with optical colonoscopy and computed tomography colonoscopy using 16-row MDCT on the same day. CT images were analyzed by the colon dissection workup with unfolded haustra visualization and also using the conventional virtual colonoscopy technique (axial images and endoluminal views). The CT analysis was performed by an experienced radiologist using both viewing methods in a randomized order and blinded to optical colonoscopy results. Results Optical colonoscopy revealed 35 colonic lesions; 15 < 5 mm, 18 between 5–9 mm and 2 > 9 mm. For conventional virtual colonoscopy analysis the overall sensitivity was 86.67%; for the colon dissection visualization technique, the overall sensitivity was 82.86%. The average reading time for conventional virtual colonoscopy was 15 ± 3 vs. 8 ± 2 min for the colon dissection visualization technique. Conclusions Our results showed that there is a significant reduction in the reading time using the colon dissection visualization technique without detriment to the detection rate, that is, competitive to conventional virtual colonoscopy interpretation results. There are no conflicts of interest in connection with the submitted article.     

Factors predicting the possibility of conducting colonoscopy without sedation

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colonoscopy without sedation costs less than sedated colonoscopy. The aims of the present study were to determine the percentage of patients who can successfully undergo nonsedated colonoscopy and to identify factors capable of predicting whether a colonoscopy can be completed without sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy-related data were prospectively recorded for consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy by an experienced endoscopist in a single private practice setting. All of the colonoscopies routinely began without sedation, unless sedation was specifically requested by the patient. Sedation was given when requested by the patient if significant discomfort occurred during the procedure. To determine factors making it more likely that nonsedated colonoscopy would be possible, age, sex, presence of diverticulosis, prior colonic surgery, prior colonoscopy, and the time required to complete the colonoscopy were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Five patients asked to have sedation before the procedure. Of 173 patients in whom colonoscopy was started without sedation, 159 (91.9%) required no sedation. Complete colonoscopy was achieved in 152 of the 173 initially nonsedated patients (87.9%) and in 167 of the total of 178 patients (93.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio 5.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 21.4) and a prior segmental colonic resection (odds ratio 6.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 48.9) were associated with an ability to complete the colonoscopy procedure without sedation. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy procedures conducted by an experienced endoscopist do not require sedation. Male sex, segmental colonic resection, and probably experience in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy on the part of the patient, are predictive factors for successful colonoscopy without sedation.     

电子结肠镜检查在儿童下消化道出血中的应用价值

目的 探讨电子结肠镜检查在儿童下消化道出血(LGIB)中的临床应用价值和胃镜替代电子结肠镜检查的可行性.方法 回顾性分析2017年1月-2020年3月该院消化内科收治的267例LGIB患儿的病历资料,对病因及电子结肠镜检查结果进行归纳总结.结果 学龄前儿童占69.29％.儿童LGIB的常见病因为肠道息肉、结直肠炎、炎症...     

Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance

Postpolypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. In this report, a careful analytic approach was used to address all available evidences to delineate the predictors for advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy and we elucidated the high risk findings of the index colonoscopy as follows: 3 or more adenomas, any adenoma larger than 10 mm, any tubulovillous or villous adenoma, any adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and any serrated polyps larger than 10 mm. Surveillance colonoscopy should be performed five years after the index colonoscopy for those without any high-risk findings and three years after the index colonoscopy for those with one or more high risk findings. However, the surveillance interval can be shortened considering the quality of the index colonoscopy, the completeness of polypectomy, the patient's general condition, and family and medical history.