Outcome of cadaveric renal transplant patients treated for 10 years with cyclosporine: is chronic allograft nephropathy the major cause of late graft loss?

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) has improved the short-term outcome of renal transplantation, but its effect on the long-term survival is not well known. METHODS: We analyzed 128 cadaveric first renal transplant recipients with CsA and prednisone as basal immunosuppression followed for at least 10 years, and we have compared them with a group of 185 historical patients treated with azathioprine (Aza) and prednisone. RESULTS: The 1-year graft survival was 83% in the CsA-treated patients and 68% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025), and the differences were significant for 3 years. Acute rejection accounted for the 10.9% of losses in CsA-treated patients and for 23.8% of losses in Aza-treated patients (P=0.046). Chronic allograft nephropathy was the cause of graft losses in 40.6% and 16.8% of cases (P=0.008). Patient survival at 5 years was 88% in CsA-treated patients and 79% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025). When analyzing the data of the 64 CsA-treated patients and the 84 Aza-treated patients with one functioning graft at 10 years, mean serum creatinine values were significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients at all time points but the increases were not significantly different. At 10 years, mean blood pressure was higher (P=0.002), and hypercholesterolemia (P=0.011) and hyperuricemia (P=0.000) were more prevalent in the CsA-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: CsA resulted in a better short-time patient and graft survival that was not maintained in the long-term outcome. Chronic allograft nephropathy was the leading cause of graft loss in CsA-treated patients. Graft function was poorer in the CsA-treated patients, but its decline was similar in the two groups.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and laboratory diagnosis in solid-organ transplant recipients

Tuberculosis (TB) is an unusual infection in transplant recipients. We evaluated (i) the frequency of TB, (ii) the duration to develop the TB infection, and (iii) clinical consequences, in 380 solid-organ recipients from January 1995 to December 2000. A total of 10 (2.63%) patients (eight renal, two liver transplant recipients) were found to have post-transplantation TB. The frequency of TB in this patient population is 8.5-fold higher than the prevalance in the general Turkish population. Tuberculosis developed within 2-33 months after transplantation, with a median of 15 months. In all of these 10 patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) was isolated from the culture. All the patients continued to have low dose immunosuppressive treatment, and also quadriple antituberculosis treatment [isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PRZ) and ethambutol (ETB)] has been given. The two recipients had died of disseminated form of TB. Relapse was detected in one patient 6 months after the completion of the treatment. As post-transplant TB infection develops mostly within the first year after transplantation, clinicians should be more careful for early and fast diagnosis and treatment should be started immediately.     

Effect of cyclosporine and delayed graft function on posttransplantation erythropoiesis

The effect of delayed graft function and immunosuppressive drugs on posttransplant erythropoiesis was studied prospectively in 18 living-related (LR) and 84 cadaver-donor (CD) recipients. Eight of 18 LR and 20 of 84 CD recipients received antilymphoblast globulin (ALG) in addition to azathioprine and prednisone. Sixty-four CD recipients received cyclosporine (CsA) with prednisone. In the absence of rejection reticulocytosis began 6.7 +/- 0.2 days following graft implantation in azathioprine-only-treated LR recipients. This was lengthened by ALG to 9.4 +/- 0.3 and 9.9 +/- 0.7 days in LR and CD recipients, respectively, whose grafts functioned immediately. Delayed graft function prolonged onset of reticulocytosis to 15.9 +/- 0.9 days in ALG-treated but not in CsA-treated recipients (5.8 +/- 0.4 days). The shortest latency was noted in CsA-treated recipients (4.9 +/- 0.5 days) with immediately functioning grafts. The earlier onset of reticulocytosis of CsA-treated recipients was followed by statistically significant blunting of peak reticulocytosis, which correlated with a slower rate of correction of anemia (delta Hct = 0.19/day) compared with non-CsA-treated recipients (delta Hct = 0.34/day). Early rejection was associated with abrogation of reticulocytosis and correction of anemia without regard to immunosuppressive regimen) until rejection was reversed. Erythropoietin (EPO) was measured sequentially in 5 patients with immediate function. In 4 of 5 cases changes in EPO preceded those in reticulocytosis. EPO rose from a mean of 13 mU/ml pretransplant to a peak of 50 within 3 weeks and decreased to 18 mU/ml within 6 weeks of graft implantation. At six months posttransplant, normalized reticulocyte counts were only 55% higher (1.75 vs. 1.13%) but hematocrit had increased from 26 +/- 1% to 42 +/- 1%. Hematocrit varied inversely with serum creatinine, which was highest in CsA-treated patients with initial delayed graft function. We conclude that correction of anemia posttransplantation is driven by EPO but other factors may also be important, that neither ATN nor ALG-therapy have clinically important effects on erythropoiesis, and that CsA reduced "effective" erythropoiesis and influences correction of anemia--particularly if delayed graft function complicates the initial course posttransplantation.     

Multiple drug combinations with "low-dose" cyclosporin for renal transplantation: Multivariate analysis of risk factors determining short-term graft survival within one renal transplant center

Abstract. The factors affecting graft survival in transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin (CsA) are still being debated. Our report is based on an analysis of 202 successive transplantations performed in our institution from May 1984 to December 1986, using low-dose CsA as the basic means of immunosuppression. A total of 142 patients received the triple combination CsA, azathioprine (AZA), and corticosteroids. Sixty patients received a prophylactic combination of CsA, corticosteroids, and antilymphocyte globulins (ALG). From January to December 1986, both regimens were compared in a prospective randomized trial. The factors that affect graft survival were analyzed using the Cox multivariate hazard analysis. The relative risks were calculated for pre-transplant baseline risk factors and for outcome-dependent post-transplant risk factors for surviving grafts at 1 month. Transplants performed with a prolonged ischemia time and patients whose graft did not function immediately were statistically at higher risk of graft loss. Adding prophylactic ALG to CsA was associated with better graft survival. Patients who experienced more than 1 rejection crisis and patients whose 1-month CsA dose was lower than or equal to 5 mg/kg per day were also at significantly higher risk of further graft loss. Neither HLA matching, peak panel reactivity, age of the recipient, occurrence of post-transplant renal dysfunction nor 1-month renal function affected the short-term graft outcome.     

Efficacy of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal allograft recipients

The efficacy of isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis in renal allograft recipients who are on long-term immunosuppression in a region highly prevalent for tuberculosis (TB) was studied. INH (300 mg/d in patients weighing more than 35 kg and 5 mg/kg/d in patients with <35 kg body weight) together with Pyridoxine 50 mg/d for 1 year was started in randomly assigned renal allograft recipients. Occurrence of clinical tuberculosis during the initial 2 years posttransplantation was observed in the risk group and patients at no risk. Risks were defined as acute rejection episodes and exposure to antirejection therapy, past history of TB completely or incompletely treated, radiological evidence of past tuberculosis, history of tuberculosis in close contacts. Among 480 patients registered in the study, INH prophylaxis was given to 219 randomly assigned renal allograft recipients. Results were compared among patients developing TB during the initial 2 years posttransplantation in both the groups. Risk factors were analyzed for comparison in both groups. No significant difference was observed in terms of past history of TB, TB in close contacts, episodes of acute rejection during the initial 3 months, and comorbidities such as cytomegalovirus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, and posttransplant diabetes. One patient from the INH group and 10 patients from the non-INH group developed TB during the initial 2 years posttransplantation (P < .0001). None of patients required discontinuation of INH. INH was observed to be safe and effective as a chemoprophylactic agent in renal allograft recipients.     

Tuberculosis in Iranian kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation recipients are at a high risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) following transplantation, especially in developing countries, with high incidences of morbidity and mortality. In this report, we examined the risk factors and impact of TB on the outcome of kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 1350 living donor Iranian kidney transplantations, 52 (3.9%) had TB diagnosed in various organs. Of these, 7 (13.5%) had TB pretransplantation and 40 (76.9%) were men. The overall mean age was 32.6 +/- 10.5 years. RESULTS: The interval between transplantation and diagnosis was 54.6 +/- 48.23 (range 4 to 140) months. In 34 (65.6%) patients TB was diagnosed after the first year posttransplantation. Pleuro/pulmonary TB was the most common form (68%). All posttransplant TB patients received a quadriple antituberculosis therapy; pyrazinamide, rifampicin, ethambutol, and isoniazide). Hepatotoxicity was seen in 16 (30%) patients, including 12 mild cases with normalization after temporary withdrawal of isoniazide and rifampicin, and four were severe, but mortality was not attributable to hepatocellular failure. Twelve patients (23%) died. Chronic allograft dysfunction occurred in 34 (65%) patients, 19 (37%) with graft loss. Pre-TB patients showed comparable posttransplant courses. CONCLUSION: TB is a common infection among renal transplant recipients in developing countries. The peak incidence is after the first year of transplantation and mortality is considerable. Hepatoxicity is a considerable risk of treatment, possibly as a result of additive toxic effects of immunosuppressive drugs. Chronic allograft nephropathy is a serious complication that has a negative impact on the graft survival.     

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus in renal allograft recipients: a matched-pair control study

The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was evaluated retrospectively in 901 consecutive renal transplant recipients. Thirty-two (3.6%) patients developed diabetes mellitus requiring drug therapy. 18 of 32 became hyperglycaemic within 3 months of transplantation. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 24 of 628 (3.8%) patients treated with conventional therapy consisting in azathioprine and prednisone, and in 8 of 273 (2.9%) patients receiving cyclosporin A (CsA) in addition (triple therapy). To identify predisposing factors 32 non-diabetic patients matched for age, sex, number of graft, immunosuppressive protocol, and graft function at onset of diabetes were used as case controls. Thirteen of 32 patients with diabetes mellitus and 5 of 32 control patients had abnormal glucose tolerance pretransplant (P less than 0.025). HLA-B8 was significantly more frequent in patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus than in control patients (9 of 29 vs 2 of 31, P less than 0.02). Twelve (38%) patients became diabetic during or immediately after anti-rejection therapy with intravenous pulse prednisone. Four diabetic patients experienced chronic pancreatitis pre-transplant. Family history of diabetes mellitus, bodyweight, number of rejection episodes, and immunosuppressive drug doses were similar in both groups. Actuarial patient and graft survival was not significantly different in diabetic patients and controls, although 10-year data tended to be better in controls. Thus, post-transplant diabetes mellitus was not a frequent complication in patients sometimes predisposed by an impaired glucose tolerance pre-transplant and was triggered by pulse prednisone therapy in 38%.     

Predictability and other aspects of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus that develops after organ transplantation may predispose patients to further complications. We studied the value of pre-transplant oral glucose tolerance testing or maximum random plasma glucose, and HLA-DR3 and/or DR4 phenotype as predictors of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus in heart transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 228 cardiac allograft recipients (median age, 50 years; mean follow-up, 4.77 years), we used either pre-transplant oral glucose tolerance testing results (Group I, n = 141)-excluding patients with pre-existing diabetes (n = 9)--or maximum random plasma glucose values (Group II, n = 78) to study predictability of post-transplant diabetes. In addition, we investigated its relation to rejection treatment and clinical course. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of post-transplant diabetes (n = 43) was 19.6%, 83% of which became manifest within 3 months post-transplant; pre-transplant body mass index was higher (p < 0.01) in this group. Mortality did not increase. Of 123 patients in Group I who survived > 3 months, post-transplant diabetes occurred in 32% vs 16% of those with impaired and normal glucose tolerance respectively (ns), and in 55% of patients with isolated post-load hyperglycemia (p < 0.05 vs normal). Maximum random glucose values (Group II) did not predict post-transplant diabetes. Prevalence of the HLA-DR3, DR4, and DR3DR4 phenotypes did not increase in post-transplant diabetes; relation to rejection treatment was likely in 30%. Approximately 50% of posttransplant diabetes patients required only temporary drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of post-transplant diabetes increased parallel to pre-transplant degree of glucose intolerance, but was considerable even in normal glucose tolerance. HLA-DR3 and/or DR4 phenotype was not a predisposing factor.     

Peri-operative immunoadsorption in sensitized renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Re-transplanted kidney allograft recipients with high levels of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) are at increased risk of early immunologic graft loss. In these patients, prophylactic peri-operative antibody depletion by immunoadsorption (IA) could prevent humoral graft injury and thus, in combination with anti-cellular rejection therapy, improve graft survival. METHODS: Twenty re-transplanted and broadly immunized cadaver kidney recipients (median PRA reactivity 87%, range 55-100%) were treated with IA (protein A) immediately before transplantation and during the early post-transplantation period (median number of IA sessions 11, range 1-24). Patients received additional prophylactic anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy. Nineteen patients had a negative pre-transplant cross-match. In one patient, a positive cross-match was rendered negative by the pre-transplant IA session. RESULTS: One-year graft survival was 80% and patient survival 95%. Median (range) serum creatinine in functioning grafts was 1.6 (0.8-2.7) mg/dl at discharge and 1.5 (1.0-5.8) mg/dl at 1 year. Two grafts were lost due to acute vascular rejection, whereby one rejection occurred after withdrawal of immunosuppression due to septicaemia. One patient had acute cellular rejection, which was reversed by a second course of anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy. Thrombotic microangiopathy and surgical complications were the causes for one graft loss each. Retrospective immunohistochemistry revealed peritubular C4d staining, a presumed marker for humoral alloreactivity, in 12 out of 15 biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that prophylactic peri-operative IA and anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy might be an effective therapeutic strategy for the prevention of early graft failure in sensitized re-transplant recipients.     

Pre-transplant Th1 and post-transplant Th2 cytokine patterns are associated with early acute rejection in renal transplant recipients

In this retrospective study, we tried to define pre- and post-transplant immunological parameters that identify patients at risk for early acute rejection. Lymphocyte subpopulations and plasma levels of cytokines and neopterin were determined pre- and post-transplant in 32 renal transplant recipients with biopsy-proven early acute graft rejection. Recipients without early acute rejection served as controls. High pre-transplant interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) plasma levels (p = 0.006), consistently high levels of neopterin early post-transplant (p = 0.008), a post-transplant switch from a Th1 to a Th2 cytokine pattern with decreasing IFN-gamma (p = 0.02), low CD8+ lymphocyte counts (p = 0.006) and consistently high CD19+ B lymphocyte counts were associated with acute rejection. Our data suggest that patients with a pre-transplant Th1 and an early post-transplant Th2 cytokine pattern are pre-disposed for early acute rejection.     

Comparison of Tuberculosis Infection Rates in a National Database of Renal Transplant Patients With Data From a Single Center in Taiwan

Successful renal transplantation (RT) improves quality of life and patient survival. Advances in immunosuppressants for RT have improved the prevention and treatment of acute rejection as well as reduced the risk of chronic graft damage, but immunodeficiency may render patients vulnerable to opportunistic infections. We conducted this study to compare the difference in tuberculosis (TB) infection rates between a single institution and a national database of RT recipients in Taiwan. There were 153 patients with TB (3.2%) among 4,835 RT recipients in the database during the period 2000–2009, with a higher prevalence of men (P = .018) and diabetes patients (P = .029). In our institution's registry, 33 patients (2.7%) developed 35 episodes of TB infection among 1,209 RT recipients, but there were no significant differences in general characteristics among different subgroups. Interestingly, the use of cyclosporine was significantly more frequent in RT recipients with TB than in those without in both the national database and in our institution. In contrast, TB infection was negatively correlated with the use of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate (MPA). RT recipients with TB infection had poor survival (P = .0013) and low graft survival (P = .0003). Taken together, analyses of the national database and the RT patients in our institution revealed that the use of long-term cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive agents was associated with a greater risk of developing post-transplantation TB compared with that of other immunosuppressive agents, but the chronicity and accumulation effect of TAC and MPA should be observed despite the negative correlation found herein. In conclusion, post-transplantation TB is a serious health threat and one of the major causes of death among RT recipients, and a high index of suspicion to ensure early diagnosis and prompt initiation of treatment for TB is crucial. The use of optimal immunosuppressive agents to minimize acute rejection, monitoring of high-risk recipients, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate treatment are required to manage TB infection in endemic areas such as Taiwan.     

Prospective randomized study of azathioprine vs cyclosporine based therapy in primary haplo-identical living-donor kidney transplantation: 20-year experience

Background The achievements in short-term graft survival since the introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) have not been matched by improvements in long-term graft function. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the second most common cause of graft attrition over time, after patient mortality. We aimed to evaluate the long-term results of azathioprine vs CsA in live-donor kidney transplantation in a prospective randomized study. Methods We studied 475 renal transplant recipients who had had transplantations performed at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, before 1988 and who had received a primary immunosuppressive protocol consisting of either steroid and azathioprine (steroid/Aza; group 1, 300 patients) or steroid and CsA (steroid/CsA; group 2, 175 patients). Only adult primary renal transplant recipients aged between 18 and 60 years and with one haplotype HLA mismatch were included. All patients received kidneys from living-related donors, with previous donor nonspecific blood transfusions. The study was based on the long-term follow-up data of these renal transplant recipients. Comparative analyses included patient and graft survival rates, condition at last follow up, rejection (acute and chronic), and graft function (serum creatinine and creatinine clearance). Results The overall frequency of acute rejection episodes was not significantly different between the two groups. Graft survival rates were: group 1 vs group 2, 69% vs 58% at 5 years, and 52% vs 36% at 10 years, but at 20 years, graft survival rates had declined to 26% and 24%. No significant differences were encountered between the two groups regarding post-transplant malignancies, diabetes mellitus, hepatic impairment, or serious bacterial infections. Conclusions From this study we can conclude that the long-term result of historical conventional therapy (steroid/Aza) without induction therapy is effective for living-donor kidney transplants. In spite of the comparable graft function for the two groups, the steroid/CsA group experienced more hypertension, as well as many adverse reactions to CsA. Nowadays, since the introduction of induction therapy and the utilization of newer maintenance immunosuppressive agents – such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rapamycin – it is possible to achieve an excellent calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-free regimen.     

Prospective randomised trial of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal transplant recipient

Renal transplantation (RT) recipients are at a high risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) following transplantation. Effectiveness of isoniazid (INH) in preventing TB is well documented in immunocompetent as well as immunocompromised persons. There is paucity of data on role of INH prophylaxis in RT recipients. Thus, a prospective randomised trial of INH in RT recipients was carried out to determine the efficacy of daily INH monotherapy in the prevention of TB in these patients. Patients of end stage renal disease (ESRD) taken for RT formed the subjects of study. Patients with active TB and active hepatitis at the time of RT were excluded from the study. Patients were randomised to receive INH 300 mg with pyridoxine 20 mg daily from the day of RT. The duration of the treatment was planned for 1 year or till the development of TB, which ever was earlier. Between October 1998 and September 2000, 114 RT were done at our hospital. Of these, 24 (21%) patients had active TB at the time of RT and thus were excluded. Patients included were randomised with 1:2 ratio of treatment and control group. Of the 90 patients thus enrolled, 30 were randomised in treatment group and 60 in control group. Of the included patients five patients had very early graft loss (three in treatment and two in control group) within days and thus excluded from the analysis. Three of the 27 (11.1%) patients in treatment group and 15 (25.8%) in control group developed TB (P = 0.10). The risk ratio of (RR) of INH versus control group of TB was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.10–1.32) but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Only one patient developed INH induced hepatitis. In conclusion, with INH prophylaxis, there was a trend towards protection from TB, though it was not statistically significant. Further, all patients tolerated INH and hepatotoxicity was not a major problem in this group of patients.     

A randomized trial comparing cyclosporine with antilymphoblast-globulin-azathioprine for renal allograft recipients. Results at 2 1/2-6 years

Between September 1980 and June 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were stratified according to presence of diabetes and donor source, and randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (pred) or antilymphoblast-globulin (ALG--azathioprine (AZA)--prednisone. As of August 1986, mean follow-up is 47 months. Over all, actuarial patient survival is 84% and 83%, respectively at 4 years. Corresponding graft survival is 70% and 63% for CsA-treated and ALG-AZA-treated patients (NS). Within the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver grafts, graft survival is 70% for CsA-treated and 53% for ALG-AZA-treated recipients (P = .035). In the CsA group, 71% required either a significant reduction in CsA dosage with the addition of azathioprine or a complete switch to azathioprine, mainly because of CsA-associated nephrotoxicity. Of those CsA patients switched at a mean time of 21.3 +/- 16.4 months posttransplant with mean serum creatinine of 2.40 +/- .67, current serum creatinine is 1.79 +/- .63. Current mean serum creatinine values are significantly greater for patients randomized to CsA-pred (1.73 +/- .60) vs. ALG-AZA-pred (1.49 +/- .59), P = .014, even though most CsA-treated patients were eventually switched. The causes of graft loss are not different between CsA and ALG-AZA randomized patients. In nondiabetics, rejection is the most common cause of graft loss (17/33), whereas in diabetics loss due to complications from overimmunosuppression or death from cardiovascular events is significantly more common (27/44) than corresponding losses in nondiabetics (6/33, P less than .05). Switching does not seem to influence the incidence or cause of graft loss. Since most patients started on CsA-prednisone are ultimately switched to triple drug therapy, the latter is now the preferred initial treatment modality.     

肾移植术后结核病的临床特征分析及诊断和治疗的单中心经验

目的 分析和总结肾移植术后结核病的临床特征及诊断和治疗的经验.方法 2842例肾移植受者中,术后有61例诊断为结核病,回顾性分析这61例患者的临床资料.结果 肾移植术后结核病的临床特点如下:(1)发病时间为术后1～156个月,发生率达2.1％(61/2842),术后1年内结核病发生率为54.1％(33/61);(2)结核病灶最常见的部位为肺部(77.0％,47/61),肺外结核的发病率高(60.7％,37/61),其中淋巴结结核14例(23.0％)、结核性胸膜炎8例(13.1％)、移植肾结核7例(11.5％);(3)术后结核病的临床表现主要为发热、咳嗽、咳痰、消瘦及淋巴结肿大;(4)结核菌素试验阴性率高(91.8％,56/61),影像学检查在结核病的诊断上具有重要意义;(5)结核病患者均采用“个体化”抗结核治疗方案,包括活动性结核感染的治疗及诊断性抗结核治疗两种方案.肝功能损害(16.4％)、肾功能损害(39.3％)及周围神经毒性(3.3％)是抗结核治疗过程中出现的主要不良反应,也是抗结核治疗失败的主要原因;(6)术前存在陈旧性结核,术后结核病复发的可能性增加(23.5％,4/17);(7)术后结核病患者常伴有细胞免疫功能减弱,常继发细菌、病毒及真菌的重叠感染(19.7％);(8)结核病患者术后1年人、肾存活率分别为85.2％和8.7％,3年人、肾存活率分别为85.2％和75.4％,总体累积死亡率达14.8 ％(9/61),重叠感染是肾移植术后结核病患者死亡的主要原因(66.7％,6/9).结论 我国肾移植受者术后并发结核病的风险较大,且容易合并各种严重并发症致患者死亡,早期诊断和治疗对提高患者的长期存活率具有重要意义.     

Persistent post-transplant polyuria managed by bilateral native-kidney laparoscopic nephrectomy

Polyuria is not considered an absolute indication for pre-transplant nephrectomy; however, it may complicate post-transplantation fluid management. Bilateral native-kidney laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed at our centre in two patients (four kidneys) 1 month after they had received a living related-donor renal transplant. The indication for nephrectomy was severe post-transplant polyuria secondary to the patient’s underlying disease: juvenile nephronophthisis. Both patients had a persistent post-transplant daily urine output of 7–8 l/day and continued to have a variable serum creatinine level, dependent on intravenous hydration, more then 3 weeks after transplantation. Bilateral laparoscopic native-kidney nephrectomy in children has previously been reported. However, to the best of our knowledge, laparoscopic nephrectomy has not been described after kidney transplantation and certainly not in the immediate post-transplantation period. The procedure was well tolerated and did not affect renal graft function. In fact, following the procedure, serum creatinine levels stabilized, while daily fluid requirements decreased to 2.5–3.5 l/day in both patients. We concluded that bilateral native-kidney nephrectomy can be safely performed in paediatric renal transplant recipients in the immediate post-transplantation period. This new approach may allow preemptive transplantation and avoid the need for a transition period on dialysis in patients for whom pre-transplant nephrectomy is not absolutely indicated.     

The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has proven to be a very effective drug for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation when dosed as prescribed at 2 or 3 g/d. However, circumstances arise in clinical transplantation where the dose must be lowered, either to avoid drug toxicity or because of concurrent infection. The impact on the incidence of acute rejection and graft survival when the MMF dose must be lowered has not previously been investigated. METHODS: In this study, a cohort of 721 kidney transplant recipients who received immunosuppression using MMF in conjunction with cyclosporine and prednisone and OKT3 (n = 425) or Simulect (n = 296) induction were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared and contrasted between patients with and without MMF dose changes within the first year post-transplantation. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.3%, n = 507) had at least one dose change within the first post-transplant year. Compared with the 214 patients who did not have a dose change, these patients had a much higher incidence of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year (23.3% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). This resulted in a significantly decreased 3-yr death-censored graft survival (76.3% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.003). The incidence of acute rejection for patients who had a dose change was highest if the dose change occurred within the first post-transplant month (34.4%). The incidence of acute rejection for the dose change patients was influenced by recipient ethnicity (African-American vs. Caucasian) and the type of induction agent used (OKT3 vs. Simulect). CONCLUSION: Altering the dose of MMF within the first post-transplant year correlated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in this cohort of renal transplant recipients. These data suggest that avoidance of MMF dose changes within the first year after renal transplantation would result in improved graft survival.     

Nocardiosis in tropical renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of nocardiosis in the tropics among renal transplant recipients has not been reported. METHODS: An evaluation of nocardiosis for 30 yr in one of the large transplant centres in South Asian region. RESULTS: Of the 1968 patients who received primary renal allografts at Christian Medical College & Hospital, 27 patients developed nocardiosis over 30 yr. Early nocardiosis (2 yr). Seventeen patients (63%) had two or more associated post-transplant infections, of whom 10 had tuberculosis. Mortality in these patients was associated with chronic liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Nocardiosis manifests earlier (<2 yr) in CsA treated patients who have chronic liver disease. Among renal transplant recipients of the tropics nocardiosis is a marker of a high susceptibility to tuberculosis and other infections, the association with tuberculosis is stronger in those developing early nocardiosis (<2 yr). Chronic liver disease is a risk factor for death in patients with nocardiosis especially when associated with tuberculosis. This report constitutes the largest single centre experience among renal transplant recipients.     

Results of the Minnesota randomized prospective trial of cyclosporine versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients

Between September 26, 1980 and June 8, 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (n = 131) or azathioprine (Aza)-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (n = 115). On December 31, 1984, actuarial patient survival rates at three years were 89% in the CsA group and 90% in the Aza group, and the corresponding graft survival rates were 82% and 79% (statistically insignificant differences). The results were also compared separately in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and in recipients of related and cadaver donor grafts; only in the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver kidneys were the differences in graft survival rates significantly different between CsA- and Aza-treated patients. The incidence of posttransplant acute tubular necrosis was similar in CsA- and Aza-treated patients (33% v 27%), but the duration was significantly longer in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (15.7 +/- 18.4 v 7.7 +/- 3.0 days). Rejection episodes and infections (particularly CMV) occurred significantly less frequently in CsA- than in Aza-treated patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (2.0 +/- 0.6 v 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl). Treatment of hypertension and hyperkalemia was required significantly more frequently in the CsA-treated patients than in the Aza-treated patients. Initial mean hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the CsA group than in the Aza group (15.6 +/- 9.5 v 19.8 +/- 10.7 days). In the CsA group, 19% of the patients were switched to Aza and 35% had Aza added to their regimen with a concomitant lowering of the CsA dose because of nephrotoxicity. The results of our randomized trial are at variance with those of others in that the graft survival rates in our trial were not different between CsA and Aza-treated patients, primarily because our conventionally-treated patients had a higher graft survival rate than in the other trials. The advantages of CsA (fewer rejection episodes, fewer infections, shorter hospitalization) outweigh the disadvantages (higher serum creatinine, more hypertension), and thus we believe it should be used in most renal allograft recipients, perhaps in combination with Aza so that a lower dose of CsA can be used and the side effects minimized--a regimen that we are currently evaluating.