Clinical effects of estramustine phosphate disodium (Estracyt) on prostatic cancer

Estramustine phosphate disodium (Estracyt) was used in the treatment of 40 patients with prostatic carcinoma. Of these 20 patients 18 were treated with Estracyt as primary treatment and 22 had been treated with diethyl stilbestrol dephosphate and/or bilateral orchiectomy for more than 4 months before the Estracyt treatment. The drug was given orally in a dose of 560 mg/day in 2 divided oral doses. The clinical evaluation was done after 3 months treatment. The response in subjective symptoms and objective signs were documented and evaluated according to 5 criteria. In this study, Estracyt showed 80% improvement of dysuria, 60% of nykturia, 35% of pain and 55% of general condition. In objective signs, it showed 52.5% improvement of size of the prostate, 42.5% of consistency and 70% of residual urine. It would be emphasized that Estracyt had almost equal efficacy in both the primary treatment group and secondary treatment group. As side effects of this drug, gynecomastia, gastro-intestinal disturbance, angina pectoris like chest pain were observed.     

Clinical study of estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) on prostatic cancer

Clinical effect of Estracyt was investigated in prostatic cancer patients. Twenty seven patients had been previously treated and 20 had not received prior treatment. Improvement rate of subjective symptoms was 85% in the previously untreated patients and that of objective findings was 85%, while those rates were 44% and 50% in the previously treated patients, respectively. Most of the adverse reactions were changes in mamma and mammary papilla which were considered to be due to the estrogenic activity.     

Treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma with estramustine phosphate (Estracyt).

Estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) was used in the treatment of 154 patients with carcinoma of the prostate in stage IV. Sixty-three patients were given Estracyt from the outset (primary treatment group) and 91 had previously received some other endocrine therapy (secondary treatment group). All of the patients were observed for more than one year. The drug was given intravenously and/or orally. Objective remissions occurred in 46 (73.0%) of the 63 patients in the primary treatment group and subjective remissions in all the objective responders and in 12 additional patients (92.0%). The corresponding figures for the secondary treatment group were 28 (30.7%) and 52 (57.1%) of 91. The side-effects were negligible, and the drug was well tolerated. No cumulative toxic effect was observed in patients who had been receiving the treatment for more than five years. In our opinion the compound is valuable in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma (stage IV).     

Treatment of prostatic cancer with estracyt® (estramustine phosphate)

The experience gained with Estracyt, kindly supplied by AB LEO, Sweden, is reported. On the basis of former data in the literature we only used the drug in estrogen resistant and advanced cases. Estracyt (estramustine phosphate) is a nitrogen mustard derivative of the urethan type, attached to oestradiol-17-phosphate. In histologically verified cases, it was administered in daily doses of 300 mg intravenously for three weeks, follwed by maintenance doses of 300 mg a week in tablets for three months. During treatment, liver and bone marrow function was checked systematically. The changes in morphological picture were studied by means of biopsies during and at the end of treatment. In agreement with the data in the literature a favourable effect was observed in estrogen resistant patients, with no toxic effect whatever on the bone marrow. At the same time GOT and GPT and BSP retention examinations demonstratee a hepatotoxic side effect. The pathological values returned to normal after withdrawal of the drug. Histological examinations showed that the tumour cells had changed but failed to disappear after treatment.     

Uptake of estramustine phosphate (estracyt) metabolites in prostatic cancer

Plasma and tumour concentrations of estramustine, estromustine, estradiol and estrone, the major metabolites of estramustine phosphate (estracyt), were determined in patients with prostatic carcinoma treated between one and nine years with repeated oral doses of estracyt (560 to 840 mg./day). The last dose was given 12 to 16 hours before sampling. The binding of radioactive estramustine and estromustine was determined in the tumour tissue to examine the possible role of estramustine-binding protein for the accumulation of these metabolites into the tumour. Comparison was made with benign prostate hyperplastic tissue from untreated patients. Estromustine was the main metabolite in plasma as well as in the tumour (range 235 to 450 and 205 to 485 ng./gm., respectively), whereas estramustine (20 to 45; 95 to 370), estrone (62 to 140; 63 to 160) and estradiol (8 to 15; 7 to 36) were found in lower concentrations. Interestingly the concentration of estramustine was as an average six times higher in the tumour than in plasma contrasting with the other metabolites which were present in equal amounts of the two localities. Binding of 3H-estramustine and 3H-estromustine was two to three times higher in the tumour than in benign hyperplastic tissue and negligible in plasma samples. The present study is the first where substantial amounts of cytotoxically active estramustine and estromustine are demonstrated in tumour tissue from estracyt treated patients. Our findings suggest a mechanism for selective uptake of these metabolites in prostatic cancer (estramustine-binding protein). The uptake and binding of estramustine and estromustine in the tumour may account for the clinical effects of estracyt in prostatic carcinoma.     

Effect of estramustine phosphate on free androgens. A comparative study of the effect of orchiectomy and estramustine phosphate on free androgens in patients with prostatic cancer

Total serum testosterone, serum testosterone binding globulin and free androgen index were determined before and during treatment in 14 patients with previously untreated disseminated prostatic cancer. Six patients received estramustine phosphate and six other patients underwent orchiectomy. Two further patients received estramustine phosphate because of tumor progression one and two years after orchiectomy. The result of the study indicates that estramustine phosphate is significantly more effective than orchiectomy in eliciting low levels of free androgens. This complete androgen ablation is produced by a depression of total testosterone and a concomitant increase of total serum testosterone binding globulin which yields a free androgen index an average 4.6 times lower in estramustine phosphate treated patients than in patients who underwent orchiectomy.     

Prospective study of estramustine phosphate for hormone refractory prostate cancer patients following androgen deprivation therapy

INTRODUCTION: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) in combination with other cytotoxic agents has been widely used in clinical trials as an anti-tumor agent for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). However, few prospective studies have considered the efficacy of EMP monotherapy for HRPC patients following androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), given the availability of methods to measure prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the serum. We therefore initiated a prospective study to determine whether EMP is efficient for HRPC following ADT using changes in PSA levels as the major endpoint. METHODS: After a diagnosis of anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome had been excluded, 34 patients with HRPC who showed an elevated serum PSA level in 3 or more sequential tests following ADT were treated orally with 560 mg/day of EMP. The clinical stage and the median PSA value for inclusion in the study were D2 and 25.9 (range 6.5-540.8) ng/ml, respectively. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression reappeared or until severe adverse effects appeared. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients enrolled, 29 were evaluated, while the other 5 (15%) patients were discontinued due to severe gastrointestinal side effects. Seven of the 29 patients (24%) showed a decrease of 50% or greater in serum PSA levels from the initially elevated values, with the median duration of PSA response being 8.0 (range 2.2-18.8) months. Baseline PSA, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, performance status, and length of time of initial hormonal treatment did not correlate with the PSA response. With a median follow-up time of 20.0 (range 3.2-45.6) months, the cancer-specific survival rate at 2 years was 83% in the PSA responders and 44% in the non-responders. The PSA response was correlated with cancer-specific survival (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Following ADT one quarter of HRPC patients responded to EMP, with more than 50% of patients showing a decrease in PSA levels and an enhanced survival rate.     

Relationship of prior hormonal therapy to subsequent estramustine phosphate treatment in advanced prostatic cancer

The relationship of prior hormonal therapy to subsequent response on estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) was examined in 107 patients with advanced prostatic cancer treated in two different Phase II chemotherapy trials. In both trials patients with the longest prior hormonal treatment were the least likely to respond to estramustine phosphate. Patients in the series from the National Prostatic Cancer Project with a response classification to prior hormonal therapy had only a 26 per cent response to subsequent estramustine phosphate therapy, whereas 40 per cent of those with no prior response to hormonal therapy responded to estramustine phosphate. This latter group had the shortest average disease duration from diagnosis. The sample of prostate cancers studied appeared to include groups that were sensitive to both hormones and cytotoxic activity as well as to either of these two alone. These data support the contention that estramustine phosphate may act both as an estrogenic and a cytotoxic agent.     

Estramustine phosphate (Estracyt®) in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma

This review presents the most important hormonal, cytotoxic and pharmacokinetic properties of estramustine phosphate. Furthermore the results of randomized Phase III trials are described in patients with hormone refractory prostatic cancer with and without previous irradiation. Several randomized studies are reported with Estracyt^® also in the primary treatment of this disease.     

The effect of estramustine phosphate on prostatic cancer estimated by transrectal ultrasonotomography

Transrectal Ultrasonotomography was performed in 44 patients with prostatic cancer before, during, and after estramustine phosphate (Estracyt®) administration. In 75.7% of 37 previously untreated patients, the deformity of the horizontal section of the prostate with prostatic cancer was corrected considerably, while in 89.2%, prostatic weight was remarkably reduced. In 57.1% of seven previously treated patients, appreciable changes were also observed in the shape and weight of the prostate. We concluded that estramustine phosphate was effective not only for untreated prostatic cancer, but also, at least in some degree, for relapsed cases.     

Clinical evaluation of estramustine phosphate and vinblastine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

We evaluated the efficacy of the combination of estramustine phosphate and vinblastine in 13 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Of 12 patients with an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at the start of treatment, 5 (42%) had a greater than 50% decrease in PSA level. In a patient with cervical and mediastinal lymph node metastases, about a 57% decrease was observed in bidimensional measurement. Side effects were mild and manageable. The survival rate was not significantly different between patients who showed a greater than 50% decrease in PSA levels or regression of lymph node metastases versus the other patients.     

Clinical study on prostatic cancer patients

Clinical observations on prostatic cancer were studied in 27 patients who had been managed in our department between April, 1980 and December, 1986. The mean age at the time of initial clinical visit was 70.6 years old with a range of 55 to 88 years old. Of all 27 patients, 15 men (55.6%) were senior citizens over 70 years old and indeed 23 men (85.2%) were over 60 years old. According to the general rules for clinical and pathological studies on prostatic cancer, there were 10 patients with stage A, 2 patients with stage B, and 15 patients with stage D disease. However, none of our patients had stage C foci of prostatic cancer. Histopathologically, biopsied or surgically resected specimen all showed adenocarcinoma. More frequently the incidence of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was found in the specimen from the patients with advanced clinical disease. Anti-androgen therapy with castration or a combined hormonal manipulation initially was done in 25 patients. Simple hormonal treatment using chlormadinone acetate (CMA) was given in 13 patients. Of 25 patients who received hormone treatment, 22 underwent castration whereas, 12 of 13 having undergone single hormonal therapy were castrated. Combined chemohormonal therapy using UFT and CMA or additionally given estramustine phosphate disodium (Estracyt) was subjected only to stage D disease of prostatic cancer. Of 15 patients surgically treated, 11 received transurethral resection of the prostate on the basis of initial diagnosis of benign prostate hypertrophy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The phase IV studies with Estracyt in prostatic cancer--supplementary report: results of long-term therapy]

Two hundred patients with prostatic cancer were enrolled in our previous study between 1984 and 1987. In this study, 96 patients of them were observed for 1 year or more after oral administration of Estracyt (estramustine sodium phosphate). Of these 96 cases, 33 patients were treated with Estracyt as primary treatment and 63 patient had been treated with other treatments before Estracyt treatment. Twelve patients were treated only with Estracyt and 84 patients also received other treatments. Thirty-eight patients were on primary therapy, 37 patients were on maintenance therapy, and 11 patients were on primary therapy, 37 patients were on maintenance therapy, and 11 patients were on the re-activated stage therapy and 10 patients were others. In conclusion, among the 67 cases in which the due judgement of the effect was possible, Estracyt was markedly effective in 10 cases (14.9%), effective in 16 cases (23.9%), slightly effective in 15 cases (22.4%) and ineffective in 26 cases (38.8%). The survival rate was 92.6% at the first year, 66.0% at the third year and 46.3% at the fifth year in the follow-up study. Adverse reactions were observed in 22 cases (22.9%), among which the administration was discontinued in 3 cases.     

Support ellagic acid therapy in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) on standard chemotherapy using vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate

BACKGROUND: Recent phase III studies in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) showed an improvement in terms of overall survival (OS), objective response (OR) and biochemical response (BR); however, chemotherapy is usually accompanied by negative side effects that determines poor quality of life (QoL) and only marginally improves individual clinical response (ICR) in terms of pain relief and performance status. Ellagic acid is a polyphenol that is found in many species of flowering plants. It is an antioxidant that determines apoptosis, down regulation of IGF-II, activates p21 (waf1/Cip1), mediates the cumulative effect on G1/S transition phase and prevents destruction of p-53 gene by cancer cells. ENDPOINTS: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ellagic acid support therapy on toxicity, OR, ICR and BR in HRPC patients treated with estramustine phosphate and vinorelbine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with HRPC were randomly distributed in two study groups: a control group (group A) who underwent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate, and an experimental group (group B) where chemotherapy regimen was associated with ellagic acid. RESULTS: The mean number of chemotherapy cycles/patient was 4 (range 3-8 cycles) and 6.5 (range 5-11) in group A and B patients, respectively. A reduction in systemic toxicity, statistically significant for neutropenia, associated with better results in term of OR rate, ICR, and BR were observed in group B compared with group A. On the contrary no significant difference in OS and PFS was detected between groups. CONCLUSIONS: our study suggests that the use of ellagic acid as support therapy reduces chemotherapy induced toxicity, in particular neutropenia, in HRCP patients; however, further studies are required to confirm our results.     

The evaluation of the effect of Estracyt on prostatic cancer

The clinical effect of Estracyt on untreated prostatic carcinoma was evaluated. The subjects consisted of 51 of 71 patients with prostatic carcinoma who were observed for 6 months or more after oral administration of 560 mg of estramustine phosphate. This drug was effective in all patients: markedly effective in 34 (66.6%), moderately effective in 13 (25.5%), and slightly effective in 4 (7.8%). During the observation period varying from 6 months to 2 years and 6 months, 7 patients had recurrence of progression. The interval between the drug administration and recurrence of progression varied from 6 months to 1 year and 10 months (mean, 15.8 months). Prostate acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein remained normal between 3 and 15 months after the administration but became elevated due to recurrence of progression after 18 months or more in some patients. Blood testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle stimulating hormone decreased while blood cortisol increased. Therefore, estrogen was acting effectively. Side effects were observed in 56.9% of the patients, the most frequent being mazoplasia in 33 patients (45.8%), and cardiovascular complications and apoplexy in 11 patients (15.3%). Estracyt was effective for untreated prostatic carcinoma but the problems such as recurrence of progression and side effects require further examination.     

Primary treatment of prostatic carcinoma with estramustine phosphate: preliminary report.

Estramustine phosphate has been used as primary treatment in 38 patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma. Of these 38 patients 36 responded objectively to treatment, regression occurring in 10 patients with soft tissue metastases, 3 with pulmonary metastases and 3 with bony metastases. Primary cytotoxic treatment in patients with far advanced prostatic carcinoma is advocated and a randomized clinical study is suggested.     

Phase-II study of docetaxel, estramustine phosphate, and carboplatin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel (DTX), estramustine phosphate (EMP), and carboplatin (CBDCA) in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: This study included a total of 40 HRPC patients. We evaluated the activity of the following schedule: weekly DTX 30 mg/m(2) iv, daily EMP 10mg/kg po, and CBDCA AUC=6 iv on day 1 of a every 4-wk cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response. A median of six consecutive cycles was administered per patient. Levels of prostate-specific antigen decreased by more than 50% in 95.0% of the patients. Consumption of medication for cancer-induced pain was reduced in 84.6%. Partial response was attained in 66.7% of measurable lesions. Of patients with bone metastasis, 8.3% demonstrated partial response. With a median follow-up of 11.4 mo, the median time to progression was 12.0 mo, and the median overall survival time was 26.6 mo. The predominant toxicities were grade-3 or -4 anemia in 32.5% of the patients, leukopenia in 20.0%, and thrombocytopenia in 17.5%. However, all toxicity was temporary and reversible with dose reduction or temporary cessation of chemotherapeutic agents. There were no therapy-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with DTX/EMP/CBDCA was found to have significant clinical activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in HRPC patients. More suitable selection of patients may be beneficial in terms of improved overall survival in the future.     

A randomized study on hormone-resistant prostatic cancer: estramustine phosphate versus low dose epirubicin with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate. A Norwegian multicenter study

A prospective randomized study has been carried out in order to compare three different treatment modalities for symptomatic metastatic hormone-resistant prostatic cancer. A total of 79 patients were included. One group was treated with estramustine phosphate, another with Epirubicin plus Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), while the third arm consisted of Epirubicin plus placebo. Best palliation was obtained by the combination of Epirubicin and MPA. This combination also seemed to be associated with the longest response duration.     

Effects of ethinyl oestradiol/polyoestradiol phosphate and estramustine phosphate on some proteins related to haemostasis in prostatic carcinoma patients

Twenty-four previously untreated patients with carcinoma of the prostate were prospectively randomized to one of the following treatments: (1) ethinyl oestradiol combined with polyoestradiol phosphate (EE/EP); (2) estramustine phosphate (EM); (3) bilateral orchiectomy. The effects on some plasma proteins related to haemostasis were studied by measuring the concentrations of alpha-1-antitrypsin, orosmmucoid, haptoglobin, antithrombin III, C1-inhibitor and von Willebrand’s factor before and 3 months after the start of treatment. Orchiectomy induced a reduction of alpha-1-antitrypsin and haptoglobin, while the other studied proteins were unaffected. It was found that both EE/EP and EM treatment induced significant decreases of orosomucoid, haptoglobin, antithrombin III and C1-inhibitor, while the same treatment increased the plasma concentration of alpha-1-antitrypsin. None of these treatments showed any influence on the plasma concentration of the von Willebrand factor. No differences were observed between EE/EP and EM for any of the studied proteins, suggesting comparable oestrogenic effects of these forms of treatment in patients with prostatic carcinoma. The findings are discussed in relation to the proposed difference in thromboembolic complications between EE/EP and EM treatments of prostatic carcinoma patients.