Skin irritant reactivity following experimental cumulative irritant contact dermatitis

Despite the frequency of irritant contact dermatitis, very little is known about the duration of barrier function impairment following cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. We studied post-irritation irritant reactivity by assessing the response to SLS irritation in previously irritated sites. Cumulative irritant contact dermatitis was induced on the forearms of 15 volunteers aged 18 to 50 years by repeated occluded application of 0.5% SLS I h per day over 3 weeks. 3, 6 and 9 weeks later, previously irritated and unirritated control sites were challenged with 2% SLS under occlusion for 23 h. Irritation was assessed by visual scoring, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as an indicator of epidermal barrier function, and capacitance as a parameter of epidermal water content. While no difference in irritant reactivity between pre-irritated and unirritated sites was observed 3 weeks following irritant contact dermatitis, there was a significant hyporeactivity of previously irritated skin as expressed by clinical scores, TEWL and capacitance at 6 and 9 weeks. Our results indicate that epidermal barrier function remains altered even 9 weeks after cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. With regard to patch testing, post-irritation hyporeactivity might be a cause of false-negative tests on previously irritated sites.     

Acute irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man

Our understanding of the details of the recovery time of acute irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is limited. We examined skin reactivity to a model surfactant, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). on previous acute ICD and normal sites over time with visual grading and noninvasive instruments. Acute ICD was induced on the upper arms of 18 volunteers (aged 30 to 51 years) by occluded application of 1% SLS for 24 h. Previous ICD and normal sites were provoked by occluded application of 2% or 7.5% SLS 30 min daily 4 consecutive days. Skin reactivity was assessed daily by visual erythema scoring (VES), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin color reflectance (SCR) and electrical capacitance (EC). Skin function of previous ICD sites assessed, by VES, TEWL. SCR, and EC did not normalize until 2 weeks later: all parameters of previous ICD returned to normal after 3 weeks. While skin reactivity to 2% und 7.5% SLS showed no differences between previous ICD and normal sites at 4 weeks, differences of irritant reactivity especially 7,5% SLS between previous ICD and normal sites were significant at 3 weeks post-provocation. Our results demonstrate that irritation evaluated with irritant provocation was long-lasting, even though skin functional parameters assessed by various bioengineering instruments returned to normal. Complete recovery of skin function including irritability after acute ICD induced by 1% SLS was achieved approximately 4 weeks later. The date were generated with a model surfactant: it remains to be determined whether similar responses will be noted with chemicals of different physicochemical properties.     

面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎患者经皮水分丢失和皮肤含水量分析

目的 分析面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎患者的皮肤屏障功能。方法 将面部分为额部、鼻尖、下颌、双面颊、双侧口角的皮损区及左耳后无皮损区共8个点，分别测量95例面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎患者及25例健康对照者的经皮水分丢失（TEWL）和皮肤含水量。结果 与健康组相比，面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎组下颌、双侧口角、双面颊TEWL值均显著升高（t值分别为4.90，2.60，2.57，2.54，3.77，P < 0.01）；双侧口角、右面颊及额部的皮肤含水量均显著降低（t值分别为3.27，3.81，2.02，2.78，P < 0.05）。在8个测量点中，面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎组与健康组TEWL值均为下颌及双侧口角 > 双面颊及额部 > 耳后无皮损区；皮肤含水量降低均为下颌及双侧口角 > 双面颊及额部 > 耳后无皮损区。结论 面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎患者下颌、双侧口角、双面颊区域皮肤屏障功能受损，口周区域TEWL值较高，而面颊皮肤水分含量较少。     

Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation

Irritant susceptibility studies have used either visual assessment or transepidermal water loss (TEWL) to determine subject response. We have developed a visual assessment method which determines subject irritant threshold. We examined the relationship between sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) irritant threshold and TEWL measurements from normal skin and SLS patch tests. 19 subjects were recruited. The irritant threshold of each subject was measured and TEWL measurements made from the applied SLS patch tests. Individuals with a lower irritant threshold (easily irritated skin) had elevated TEWL levels compared to those with higher thresholds. The irritant threshold test had a low intraindividual variation. This study showed that the 2 methods grouped patients in a similar manner. The variation seen may reflect the different outcomes measured: irritant threshold visually assesses the skin inflammatory response while TEWL measures skin barrier modification.     

Prediction of susceptibility to an irritant response by transepidermal water loss

The roles of the natural permeability of the stratum corneum to water, and the changes in that permeability effected by a single patch test, were investigated as parameters to predict the susceptibility of the skin to repeated exposures of an irritant. One site on the forearm skin of 27 non-atopic healthy subjects was exposed to a 0.5% concentration of sodium lauryl sulphate by a single occlusive 24-h patch. Another site was exposed to a twice daily 4-day repeated occlusive patch with the same irritant solution. The effects were evaluated by transepidermal water loss measurements made prior to the applications (baseline) on day 1 (BASE), following the single 24-h patch on day 2 (SINGL), and following the 4-day repeated applications on day 5 (REPET). Individuals with higher BASE had higher SINGL (R = 0.80, P less than 0.001) and higher REPET (R = 0.76, P less than 0.001). There was also a significant linear correlation between SINGL and REPET (R = 0.63, P less than 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis of results, however, indicated that a high baseline TEWL is better indication of an individual's increased susceptibility (high REPET) to weak irritants than a high TEWL value following a single 24-h patch test. Baseline TEWL may therefore be used as a reasonably accurate preliminary "predictive" screening test for susceptibility to irritants.     

Is atopic dermatitis a predisposing factor for experimental acute irritant contact dermatitis?

Proclivity to acute irritant contact dermatitis has been reviewed by comparing the response in patients with atopic dermatitis to controls. Although several controlled studies demonstrate such a proclivity, others do not, suggesting that the mechanisms involved are complex.     

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common skin disease, especially in the workplace, but determining the recovery time of chronic ICD is not easy. To measure the recovery time of chronic ICD, we examined the skin reactivity to a model surfactant, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), on previous chronic ICD and normal sites by visual grade and non-invasive instruments. Chronic ICD was induced on the forearms of 10 volunteers (aged 23 to 43 years) by occluded application of 1% SLS for 30 min on 5 consecutive days each week for 3 weeks. Previous ICD and normal sites were provoked by the occluded application of 7.5% SLS for 30 min daily on 4 consecutive days, 2, 5 and 10 weeks after induction. Skin reactivity was assessed daily by awarding visual erythema scores, visual scale scores and measuring transepidermal water loss, skin color reflectance, and electrical capacitance. Skin reactivity of previous chronic ICD sites to SLS showed hyperreactivity compared to normal sites even after the 10th week post-induction.     

Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application

In clinical practice, cutaneous exposure to a variety of irritants such as surfactants and solvents is frequent. Although the induction of irritant dermatitis by single irritants has been extensively studied in recent years, our knowledge of the effects of simultaneous application of different irritants is limited. Using non-invasive techniques for measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin colour reflectance, we quantified the irritant effects of single and concurrent application of 0.5% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) and undiluted toluene (TOL) in vivo. The irritants were applied twice daily for 30 min to the volar forearms of 20 volunteers. Repeated application of SLS and TOL induced an irritant reaction, as indicated by an increase in TEWL and skin redness. In contrast to SLS alone, the application of TOL alone induced only a moderate increase in TEWL, confirming previous results. Concurrent application of SLS/TOL and TOL/SLS induced significantly stronger reactions than those caused by twice daily application of each irritant on its own. Our results demonstrate that a mixed application of an anionic detergent and an organic solvent has an additive effect on skin irritation. It is suggested that pretreatment with SLS causes an increased susceptibility to TOL irritation and vice versa. Thus, the necessity for special precautions against skin absorption of TOL when handling detergents such as SLS is emphasized.     

Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design

BACKGROUND: Irritant patch testing is often performed as a 24- or 48-h occlusive patch test with low concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate potential ways to shorten this test procedure and obtain precise test results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six healthy volunteers underwent irritant patch testing with different pretreatments (PT) of the test fields. Occlusive test chambers were applied on the upper back with SLS 0.5%, 1%, 2% and 5% in large Finn Chambers(R). The patches were removed after 4 and 24 h, respectively, depending on the concentration used. Test fields were pretreated as follows: PT 0, field without any PT (control); PT 1, prick with lancet; PT 2, prick with test stamp; PT 3, scratch with lancet; PT 4, incision with standardized incision instrument (0.1-0.2 mm depth). Skin reactions were evaluated by transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin erythema and skin hydration and as well by a visual score (VS) at 4, 24 and 72 h. RESULTS: Our data show an obvious distinction between PT 0-2 and PT 3-4 at all measurement methods. The average TEWL values with PT 3-4 were higher than those with PT 0-2, especially on the 4-h course. This distinction may derive from the shape and size of the skin impairment achieved by PT 3-4, leading to a mechanical barrier disruption. However, SLS may infiltrate directly into deeper skin layers supported by capillarity. Consequently, no or little penetration through the epidermis and interaction with its structures occurs, which is responsible for irritant skin reactions. The SLS dose in the upper skin layers is therefore lower at these PTs. The lower remaining dose of SLS also explains this distinction, especially for the VS. Additionally, there are presumed reactions in deeper layers of the epidermis and dermis at PT 3-4. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, all data suggest a different reaction pattern from the classical irritant response. Therefore, application without any PT seems to be best suited for irritancy skin testing, especially for visual assessment. PTs prior to irritant patch testing have been shown to be unjustifiable.     

Assessment of anti-inflammatory activity of Poria cocos in sodium lauryl sulphate-induced irritant contact dermatitis

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we evaluated the anti-inflammatory activity of Poria cocos (PoCo) on experimentally induced irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) in a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) irritation model. METHODS: The anti-irritative effect of PoCo was evaluated with a visual score and quantified by non-invasive bioengineering methods, namely chromametry and transepidermal water loss. Three concentrations of PoCo in base cream DAC (amphiphilic emollient; German pharmacopoeia) were tested in a 4-day repetitive irritation test using SLS. RESULTS: A statistically significant anti-inflammatory activity was observed for PoCo by all three methods when applied in parallel to the induction period of ICD. Application of PoCo after induction of ICD once a day for 5 days, starting just at the end of 4 days, was without any effect. CONCLUSION: An anti-inflammatory efficacy of PoCo on the elicitation phase of the ICD induced by repeated SLS test could be observed and quantified by three independent, non-invasive biophysical assessment parameters. This effect can be explained by its influence on pro-inflammatory enzymes, namely phospholipase A2.     

免疫磁性技术分离提纯酵母样真菌的研究

用包被有羊抗鼠ＩｇＧ的磁珠结合鼠抗白念单抗后，对白念珠菌，类星形念珠菌，类星形念珠菌，热带念珠菌，新生隐球菌，光滑念珠菌菌悬液及白念珠菌与新生隐球菌两菌混悬液进行了分离纯化研究。结果：免疫磁球和白念珠菌，类星形念珠菌结合尤为明显，与热带念珠菌少量结合而不和新生隐球菌，光滑念珠菌结合。     

Transepidermal water loss and incidence of hand dermatitis in a prospectively followed cohort of apprentice nurses

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence of hand dermatitis, the impact of potential risk factors and the efficacy of skin bioengineering in a prospectively followed cohort of apprentice nurses. 104 participants were prospectively followed for 3 years. Before the start of training, after about 1 year and in the third year of occupational exposure, a standardized questionnaire was distributed, and a clinical examination with skin bioengineering of the dorsum of hand and forearm was performed. The 12-month period prevalence of self-reported symptoms of hand dermatitis was 36.5%[95%-confidence interval (CI) 27.3-46.6] at intermediate follow-up and 43.3% (95%-CI 33.6-53.3) at the final examination. Apprentices with self-reported symptoms at the final examination showed a significant increase of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) at the dorsal hand from 10.15 g/m2h to 13.55 g/m2h. TEWL at this site did, at the initial examination, not differ significantly between persons who later reported symptoms of hand dermatitis at the final examination and those who did not (10.50 g/m2h versus 10.15 g/m2h, respectively). Our results do not support the notion that an increased basal TEWL is a good indicator for hand dermatitis risk.     

Barrier recovery and influence of irritant stimuli in skin treated with a moisturizing cream

Moisturizers are used daily by many people to alleviate symptoms of clinically and subjectively dry skin. Recent studies suggest that certain ingredients in creams may accelerate the recovery of a disrupted barrier and decrease the skin susceptibility to irritant stimuli. In the present single-blind study, a moisturizing cream was tested for its influence both on barrier recovery in surfuctant-damaged skin and on the susceptibility of normal skin to exposure to the irritant sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS). Parameters measured were transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin corneometer values, indicating degree of hydration. Treatment of surfactant-damaged skin with the test cream for 14 days promoted barrier recovery, as observed as a decrease in TEWL. Skin corneometer values also normalized more rapidly during the treatment. In normal skin, use or the test cream significantly reduced TFWL after 14 days of treatment, and irritant reactions to SLS were, significantly decreased. Skin corneometer values increased after only 1 application and remained elevated after 14 days. In conclusion, the accelerated rate of recovery of surfactant-damaged skin and the lower degree of SLS-induced irritation in normal skin treated with the test cream may be of clinical relevance in attempts to reduce contact dermatitis due to irritant stimuli.     

Effect of age and sex on the elicitation of irritant contact dermatitis

Irritant contact dermatitis causes significant disability to numerous consumers and individuals in industry. Knowledge of the prevalence of this disease remains inadequate. Irritant contact dermatitis occurs in workers engaged in occupations where the subjects are exposed to different types and doses of irritants. The intensity of the reaction depends on the quality and the quantity of exposure. Irritant thresholds and dose responses depend on many different factors. This article reviews the clinical and physiological parameters that affect the age and sex related differences in irritant contact dermatitis.     

Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis

An attempt is made to formulate some kind of working hypothesis concerning the pathophysiology, clinical appearance and treatment of irritant contact dermatitis.
Acute irritant dermatitis may he caused by one single overwhelming external exposure of comparatively short duration. It is usually accidental and therefore recognized early as cause and effect.
Chronic irritant dermatitis may be the result of a too early repetition of one impairing factor (chronic irritant dermatitis 'traumiteration' type), but is more commonly the result of the influence of a variety of stimuli, each starting to be active before recovery from the foregoing stimuli has been completed (chronic irritant dermatitis 'summation' type). By repetition of the same stimulus, or by a combination of varying stimuli, the degree of impairment surpasses a critical level, in consequence of which a clinical disease (irritant contact dermatitis) ensues. This clinical disease, however, is only 'the tip of the iceberg'.
Such stimuli may be chemical, mechanical and/or climatic. To find out which are the harmful factors requires a detailed case history about the patient's work, habits and hobbies, thus enabling him to avoid as many damaging exposures as is practical, and hence reducing the sum of causative factors. A number of causative factors are enumerated.
The article is intended to be a catalyst to promote discussion on this subject.     

Transepidermal water loss in adhesive tape induced dermatitis

As an index of skin barrier function, transepidermal water loss (TEW) was investigated in subjects reactive to adhesive tapes. Tape reactive subjects showed no difference in TEW in untreated skin when compared to non-reactive subjects. Plastic tape and transparent tape produced varying degrees of dermatitis in reactive subjects; the TEW was increased up to 40-fold of the baseline values correlating with the degree of dermatitis. Paper tape and plastic film without adhesive did not produce dermatitis and increased water loss. Regeneration of skin damage was accompanied by a decrease of TEW values. The general problem of tape reactors and tape irritation is discussed.     

Multiple parameter assessment of vulvar irritant contact dermatitis

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), capacitance, pH, blood flow and color reflectance were evaluated for quantifying the irritant response of vulvar and forearm skin to 3% sodium lauryl sulfate in 9 healthy premenopausal women. TEWL, capacitance, pH, blood flow, and all parameters of color reflectance changed significantly in forearm irritant dermatitis. In vulvar irritant dermatitis, however, significant changes were observed only for blood flow and the color reflectance parameters a* and b*. Using the combination of TEWL, capacitance and blood flow, forearm irritant dermatitis was detected with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 100%. In this study, the best combination of parameters to detect vulvar irritant dermatitis was pH, blood flow, a* and b*, which had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 75%. It is concluded that available bioengineering techniques are less suitable to quantify irritant dermatitis in the vulva than in the forearm.     

Time course of occlusive effects on skin evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) Including patch tests with sodium lauryl sulphate and water

The time course for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) for a period of 3 h after removal of occlusive patch tests with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), water and empty chambers was studied in healthy volunteers. Patches were applied to the upper arm for 24 h, TEWL was measured immediately after removal of the patches, and every 30 min up to 3 h. For SLS and water patches, TEWL remained significantly increased for 3 h. as compared to normal adjacent skin, while for empty chamber patches. TEWL was only significantly increased for 30 min. A significant decrease from 0 to 30 min and from 30 to 60 min was observed for all patches, and for water patches, a significant decrease in TEWL was found from 60 to 180 min, while SLS patches remained constant. The prolonged increase in TEWL observed after SLS exposure is a well-known occurrence. The prolonged increase in TEWL after exposure to water is interpreted as transient damage to the water harrier of the skin.     

Baseline transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as a prediction of susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulphate

The rôle of different factors in the susceptibility of the skin to weak irritants was studied by means of multiple linear regression models. The skin of 37 healthy subjects was exposed to a solution of sodium lauryl sulphate of low molarity 2 × daily for 4 days. The condition of the skin was evaluated by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements on the 1st day (before exposure, TEWL1) and on the 5th day of exposure (TEWL5), and by a visual scoring system. The TEWL5 value was strongly related to the TEWL1 value (R = 0.71). The influence of such factors as history of mucosal atopy, history of sensitivity to soap, dry skin, skin type, sex and age on the TEWL5 value was negligible. The baseline TEWL level (TEWL1) might be a reliable indication of an individual's susceptibility to weak irritants.