2种胶姆糖对菌斑pH值的影响

目的：观察咀嚼2种胶姆糖后口腔菌斑pH值的变化情况.方法：选择8例健康受试者（年龄23～27岁,男4例,女4例）参加3次试验,每次实验开始前停止刷牙24h,在使用10%的蔗糖溶液漱口前以及漱口后5、10、15、20min,用Beetrode pH微电极测量口腔菌斑的pH值,作为基线值.1周后先测量静息pH值,再用蔗糖溶液漱口,1min后给予无糖胶姆糖咀嚼,在5、10、15、20min时间点,分别测量非咀嚼侧的菌斑pH值.1周后重复上述实验,胶姆糖改为含茶多酚胶姆糖.应用SPSS10.0统计软件包对数据进行单因素方差分析和SNK分析.结果：与基线值比较,咀嚼2种胶姆糖都能有效防止由于含漱蔗糖水导致的菌斑pH值下降,并使pH值维持在静息pH值以上.2种胶姆糖之间无显著性差异（P＞0.05）.结论：咀嚼2种胶姆糖均能防止菌斑pH值下降,减少患龋危险.     

The effect of increased mastication by daily gum-chewing on salivary gland output and dental plaque acidogenicity.

The effect of increased mastication on plaque metabolism and salivary gland function was determined in 11 human subjects who chewed a sugarless gum for ten minutes of each waking hour for two weeks. Prior to and at the conclusion of the gum-chewing regimen, unstimulated whole saliva and 2% citric-acid-stimulated parotid saliva were collected. Flow rates, pH, and buffer capacity were determined on all saliva samples. In addition, parotid saliva was analyzed for protein concentration and the proteins further studied by SDS-PAGE. The plaque pH response to a 10% sucrose rinse was also measured before and after the regimen. Significant increases were observed in the pH and buffer capacity of unstimulated whole saliva as were similar increases in the flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity of stimulated parotid saliva. Protein concentrations and profiles remained unaffected. In addition, the resting plaque pH and minimum plaque pH reached after a sucrose challenge were both raised significantly, with a significant reduction in the cH area. The results of this study indicate that increased masticatory effort by frequent consumption of sugar-free chewing gum over a prolonged time period resulted in a functional increase in the output of stimulated parotid saliva, as well as in increases in pH and buffer capacity of whole and parotid saliva, which may help to reduce plaque acidogenicity.     

Salivary concentrations of urea released from a chewing gum containing urea and how these affect the urea content of gel-stabilized plaques and their pH after exposure to sucrose

The objectives were to: (1) determine the salivary concentrations of urea during 20 min chewing of a sugar-free gum containing 30 mg of urea; (2) measure the degree to which this urea would diffuse into a gel-stabilized plaque; (3) study the effect of the urea on the fall and subsequent rise in pH (Stephan curve) on exposure to 10% sucrose for 1 min; (4) model the measurements 2 and 3 mathematically. In point 1, the salivary urea concentration of the 12 subjects peaked at 47 mmol/l in the first 2 min of gum chewing, falling within 15 min to the unstimulated salivary concentration of 3.4 mmol/l. Recovery of urea from the saliva averaged 81.5%. 'Plaques' of 1% agarose or 67% dead bacteria in agarose accumulated urea from the saliva roughly as expected, whereas those plaques containing 8% live and 59% dead Streptococcus vestibularis showed negligible accumulation. Computer modelling showed this difference to be due to urease of live bacteria breaking down the urea as rapidly as it entered the plaque. Simulation of the effect of gum chewing subsequent to initiation of a Stephan curve in the latter type of plaque showed a rapid rise in pH but then a fall again on return to unstimulated conditions. This fall had not been seen in previous studies, with Streptococcus oralis, nor was it predicted by the computer modelling. Neither experimental simulation nor computer modelling suggested that chewing urea-containing gum before exposure to sucrose would have any effect on a subsequent Stephan curve. Thus chewing gum is only likely to inhibit caries when it is chewed after consumption of fermentable carbohydrate, rather than before.     

咀嚼口香糖对含漱蔗糖溶液后牙菌斑原位pH值的影响

目的：观察咀嚼含糖口香糖和含木糖醇口香糖对牙菌斑原位pH值变化的影响。方法：选择10名健康青年志愿者，采用受试者自身对照的临床试验方法，分别检测受试者含漱蔗糖溶液后咀嚼含糖口香糖和含木糖醇口香糖50min内牙菌斑pH值的动态变化。牙菌斑原位pH值的测定采用pH微电极接触法在口内直接测量。结果：含漱蔗糖溶液后5min开始咀嚼口香糖20min，可以明显提高牙菌斑pH值，使pH较快恢复至静止水平。咀嚼初期使用含糖口香糖牙菌斑pH无明显变化，而使用含木糖醇口香糖在咀嚼初期就可以明显提高牙菌斑pH至7．30。结论：含漱蔗糖溶液后，咀嚼无糖口香糖对牙菌斑的酸性产物产生明显的缓冲作用，提高菌斑pH值的作用较咀嚼含糖口香糖迅速而有效。     

Composition of plaque and saliva following use of an alpha-tricalcium-phosphate-containing chewing gum and a subsequent sucrose challenge

Previous studies demonstrated that the chewing of a 2.5% (mass fraction) alpha-tricalcium-phosphate-fortified (alpha-TCP) experimental chewing gum released sufficient calcium and phosphate to eliminate any fall in the tooth mineral saturation of plaque fluid after a sucrose rinse (Vogel et al., 1998). In contrast, the chewing of a conventional sugar-free gum did not eliminate this decrease in saturation. The purpose of this study was to examine if the release of ions from plaque calcium-phosphate pools induced by this gum could provide protection during subsequent exposure to cariogenic conditions. Fourteen subjects accumulated plaque for 48 hrs, fasted overnight, chewed a control or experimental gum for 15 min, and subsequently rinsed 1 min with a mass fraction 10% sucrose solution. Before gum chewing, and at 7 min and 15 min afterward, whole plaque, plaque fluid, and salivary samples were obtained and analyzed by micro-analytical techniques. Additional samples were collected and analyzed at 25 min (7 min after the sucrose rinse). Although the results confirmed the deposition of large amounts of calcium and phosphates in plaque seen in the previous study, only a small increase was seen in plaque-fluid-free calcium and phosphate before sucrose administration. This suggests that few of the mineral ions were mobilized under non-cariogenic conditions. However, 7 min after the sucrose rinsing, an increase in these concentrations was seen which, based on hydroxyapatite ion activity product calculations, indicated a decrease in the driving force for demineralization compared with that seen with the control gum. These results suggest that the chewing of the experimental gum deposits a labile mineral reservoir in plaque that can resist a subsequent cariogenic challenge.     

Chitosan-containing gum chewing accelerates antibacterial effect with an increase in salivary secretion

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to confirm the mechanical efficacy of chewing chitosan-containing gum to suppress the growth of oral bacteria compared to a mouth rinse, and to demonstrate the increased salivary secretion due to chewing chitosan-containing gum. METHOD: Twelve healthy subjects were recruited from among the staff and students of Nagasaki University School of Dentistry. For the slab of gum study, the subjects chewed chitosan-containing gum for 5 min and then rested for 5 min. For the testing of the chitosan mouth rinse solution, the subjects gargled 10 mL of solution for 30s followed by resting for 9 min 30s. These protocols were continuously repeated five times for 50 min on the same day. For the salivary secretion experiment, the gum chewing was repeated three times per day for 2 days. RESULTS: The amount of oral bacteria in the subjects who chewed chitosan-containing gum significantly decreased during all three sampling times except at 60 min for total bacteria in comparison to those in the rinse group. Chitosan-containing gum chewing also significantly increased the secretion of saliva. CONCLUSIONS: Chitosan-containing gum chewing has a greater antibacterial effect and it also increases salivary secretion. The present findings strongly indicate that the application of natural materials such as chitosan is useful for both oral health and the quality of life.     

咀嚼无糖口香糖对含漱蔗糖溶液后牙菌斑原位pH值的影响

目的 通过对牙菌斑原位pH值变化的动态监测，观察咀嚼无糖口香糖对牙菌斑原位pH值的影响。方法 采用受试者自身对照的临床试验方法，选择16名健康成人志愿者为受试者，年龄23～32岁，其中男性6名，女性10名。首先测定受试者48h菌斑的静止pH值，以及受试者用10％蔗糖溶液含漱1min后在5、10、20和30min时菌斑的pH值，取得受试者的Stephan曲线作为基线对照；而后观察咀嚼两种益达无糖口香糖对含漱10％蔗糖溶液后菌斑pH值变化的影响。菌斑原位pH值的测定采用pH微电极接触法在口内直接测量。结果 含漱10％蔗糖溶液后立即开始咀嚼无糖口香糖可使菌斑pH值在各检测时间点(含漱10％蔗糖溶液后5、10、20和30min)均维持在静止pH水平，无明显下降；含漱10％蔗糖溶液后在5min时开始咀嚼无糖口香糖则使菌斑pH值从含漱蔗糖溶液后5min时的5．59迅速回升至10min时的6．98。结论 受到蔗糖攻击后，咀嚼无糖口香糖可迅速缓冲菌斑的酸性产物，升高菌斑pH值。     

Salivary flow rate and pH during prolonged gum chewing in humans

Gum chewing for 20 min causes an increase in salivary flow rate and salivary pH. Most people chew gum for longer than 20 min, and our aim was to determine how whole mouth salivary flow rate and pH might adapt during prolonged gum chewing. Resting saliva was collected over 5 min; gum-stimulated saliva was collected at intervals during 90 min, chewing a single pellet (1.5 g) of mint-flavoured, sugar-free gum (n = 19). Subjects chewed at their own preferred rate and style. Both salivary flow rate and pH were increased above resting levels for the entire 90 min. The salivary flow was significantly greater (anovaP < 0.05) than resting flows up to 55-min chewing. The saliva pH remained significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than the resting pH even after 90-min chewing. When the experiment was repeated with the gum pellets replaced at 30 and 60 min (n = 9), similar increases in salivary flow rate and pH were found. In the latter experiment, there was no evidence of any cumulative effects on flow or pH. The persistent increase in salivary pH in particular could be beneficial to oral and dental health.     

The unstimulated salivary flow rate after prolonged gum chewing

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, after a prolonged period of gum chewing, the unstimulated salivary flow rate falls below the unstimulated flow rate before gum chewing. DESIGN: Six males and six females each collected whole saliva at intervals for up to 105 min on two separate days. On one control day they collected unstimulated saliva over the -10 to 0 and 90 to 105 min periods. On the other day, they made the same collections of unstimulated saliva but, in addition, chewed two tablets of Wrigley's peppermint-flavoured gum over the 0-90 min period. The data on flow rates were subjected to repeated-measures ANOVA and Duncan tests. RESULTS: The unstimulated flow rates in the -10 to 0 and 90 to 105 min periods were not significantly different on the same day or between days and the values were all significantly less (P<0.05) than the stimulated flow rates, while gum was being chewed. CONCLUSION: This study provided no evidence that the unstimulated salivary flow rate is reduced after prolonged gum chewing. Patients who complain of mouth dryness after prolonged gum chewing may have become accustomed to the larger volume of saliva present in the mouth during the gum chewing.     

The effect of chewing sorbitol-sweetened gum on salivary flow and cemental plaque pH in subjects with low salivary flow

The purpose of this work was to study the effect of chewing a sorbitol-sweetened gum on whole and parotid salivary flow rates, and on the cemental plaque pH response to a sucrose rinse challenge, in subjects with low salivary flow. The results show that chewing a flavored sugarless gum significantly increases salivary flow rates in individuals with dry mouth. Additionally, chewing the sorbitol-sweetened gum effectively prevents the fall in cemental plaque pH generally seen in response to a sucrose challenge. This indicates that chewing a sorbitol-sweetened gum provides a palliative and possibly a protective benefit for people who suffer from dry mouth.     

Changes in lactate and other ions in plaque and saliva after a fluoride rinse and subsequent sucrose administration

The purpose of this study was to examine plaque and saliva composition after a fluoride rinse and subsequent sucrose application. Fifteen subjects accumulated plaque for 48 h, and then rinsed with a fluoride rinse based on 228 microg/g (ppm) Na2SiF6 and some received no rinse. After 60 min, upper and lower buccal molar plaque samples and 1-min saliva samples were collected. The subjects then rinsed with 10% g/g sucrose solution, and 7 and 15 min later, a second and a third set of samples were collected. Plaque fluid and clarified saliva were then recovered from these samples by centrifugation, and the remaining plaque acid extracted. The plaque fluid, centrifuged saliva, and plaque extract samples were then analyzed using micro techniques for pH, free calcium, phosphate, organic acids (plaque fluid and saliva only) and fluoride. Considering both the fluoride rinse and no-rinse groups, the most notable compositional changes in saliva 7 min after the sucrose rinse were pH -0.40 unit, free calcium 0.42 mM, lactate 5.2 mM, phosphate -1.3 mM, and fluoride 2.8 microM; while in plaque fluid, the corresponding changes were pH -1.59 unit, free calcium 1.5 mM, lactate 35 mM, phosphate -1.6 mM and fluoride -26 microM. After sucrose rinsing, undersaturation was found with respect to dicalcium phosphate dihydrate in saliva and plaque fluid and with respect to tooth enamel in some plaque fluid samples. Plaque fluid composition appeared to be strongly influenced by salivary clearance, diffusive loss of ions into the water phase of the rinse, and lower jaw pooling of the sucrose and fluoride components of the rinses. After the experimental rinse, the fluoride concentration in plaque fluid [86 +/- 22 mM (upper molar site), 162 +/- 150 mM (lower molar site)], saliva (26 +/- 18 mM), and whole plaque [99 +/- 97 microg/g (upper molar site), 197 +/- 412 microg/g (lower molar site)] was comparable to the values in previous studies using this rinse. These very high plaque fluid fluoride concentrations, compared with the 'no-rinse' samples, induced an approximately 0.3-unit increase in the plaque fluid pH 7 min after the sucrose rinse, a small decrease (approximately 20%) in lactate production and a modest increase in enamel saturation. Although these changes were all statistically significant, no correlation was found between the decrease in lactate concentration and plaque fluid fluoride, pH or whole plaque fluoride.     

Prevention of sucrose-induced demineralization of tooth enamel by chewing sorbitol gum

Measurements were made of the effect of chewing sorbitol gum on the intra-oral demineralization induced by rinsing with 10% sucrose solutions. Blocks of bovine enamel were covered with a layer of Streptococcus mutans IB1600, and mounted on palatal appliances that were worn by five subjects for defined periods of time. Enamel demineralization was determined by following changes in iodide penetrability (delta Ip) of the enamel surfaces. Delta Ip increased to a maximum of about 15 units between 30 and 45 min, while the pH of the S. mutans plaque dropped to below 4 by 15 min. Plaque pH returned to 4.9 by 60 min. Chewing sorbitol gum after the sucrose rinse minimized further increases in delta Ip and brought about a more rapid return of the S. mutans plaque pH toward neutrality. The effect of chewing gum was greater when chewing was initiated earlier so that, when gum was given at five min after the sucrose rinse, demineralization was only 37% of that obtained without gum. The findings confirm earlier reports on the effect of gum on plaque pH, and directly demonstrate the profound protective effects that chewing sorbitol gum can have on tooth enamel.     

The effect of chewing urea-containing gum on plaque acidogenic and alkaligenic parameters

The aim of this double-blind crossover study was to determine the effect of chewing urea-containing gum on selected microbiological plaque properties. Eleven subjects chewed either urea-containing or urea-free placebo gum 3 times daily, each for 4 weeks, with at least a 4-week separation between regimes. After each chewing regime, plaque was sampled from all available surfaces, and inoculated into media indicative of acid or base production. In addition, interdental pH measurements were taken using touch Beetrode electrodes following sucrose and sorbitol mouthrinses, and sucrose mouthrinses followed by urea rinse, urea gum, or placebo gum. No significant differences in plaque acidogenic and alkaligenic properties were found between the urea and placebo gum regimes. Urea rinsing, urea gum and placebo gum all reduced the depth and duration of the pH fall following a sucrose mouthrinse. They also enhanced a rise in pH above the resting pH, but although urea gum produced a larger increase than placebo gum, the difference was not significant.     

The effects of prolonged gum chewing on salivary flow rate and composition

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of gum chewing for 2 h on salivary flow rate and composition. DESIGN: Five male and five females each collected whole saliva at intervals over a 2 h period on three separate days, prior to which they collected unstimulated saliva for 5 min. For one 2 h session they continued to collect only unstimulated saliva while for the others one tablet of Wrigley's Extra peppermint- or fruit-flavoured (peach) gum was chewed continuously. Flow rates were calculated and the saliva was assayed for pH and for Na, K, Ca, Cl, inorganic P and protein concentrations. The data were subjected to repeated-measures ANOVA and Duncan tests. RESULTS: When only unstimulated saliva was collected, there was no significant change in salivary flow rate over the 2 h. With the chewing gums the flow rate increased initially and then, after 35-40 min, fell to similar plateau values which remained significantly higher than the initial unstimulated flow rate and significantly higher than the flow rate at the corresponding time intervals when only unstimulated saliva was collected. With both gums the salivary pH from 2 min to 2 h was significantly higher than that of unstimulated saliva. The changes in the salivary electrolyte and protein concentrations due to the flow rate increase elicited by the chewing gum were largely as expected from previous studies on parotid and submandibular saliva. CONCLUSION: During prolonged chewing gum use, both salivary flow rates and pH remained significantly above the values for unstimulated saliva.     

Release of fluoride from fluoride-containing chewing gum

The release of fluoride from fluoride-containing chewing gum and the fluoride concentration in whole saliva was measured at different intervals after the start of the chewing procedures. The residual fluoride contents were 78, 32, and 6% of the initial 0.25 mg in the gum after chewing for 2, 5, and 10 min, respectively. When chewing for 10 min, the salivary fluoride increased from 0.05 to 11.7 and 15.3 parts/10(6) after 2 and 5 min, respectively, followed by a fall to 3.9 parts/10(6) after 10 min. Concentrations exceeding the preintake level were still recorded 60 min after the start of the chewing.     

Effect of gum chewing on plaque accumulation

The purpose of this investigation was to test the effect of chewing gum sweetened with either sorbitol (LG) or sucrose (SG) on the growth of plaque on tooth enamel surfaces. Nineteen dental students, in a balanced crossover design, chewed the two gums for 5 days without normal oral hygiene practices. The control treatment was a 5-day non-chewing (NG) phase. A period of 9 days was allowed for normal hygiene between test phases. The chewing regimen required 20 minutes of use of one stick of chewing gum immediately after meals or snacks. The average number of sticks chewed was 3.8/day. Pre- and post-treatment plaque scores were recorded by two examiners using a Modified Navy Plaque Index (PLI) from 0 to 9 along each of four surfaces to assess six Ramfjord teeth. Pre-treatment mean PLI scores for the 3 test treatments were, NG = 2.0, LG = 1.9 and SG = 1.9. Post-treatment mean PLI scores were, NG = 3.6, LG = 3.3 and SG = 3.3. ANOVA of pre- and post-treatment scores revealed no significant differences between treatments. Post-treatment scores of the 2 chewing gums were then pooled, independent of sweetener. ANOVA of these data revealed chewing gum (LG + SG = 3.3) to cause significantly less plaque accumulation than no gum (NG = 3.6). In a no oral hygiene environment, plaque accumulation during use of sorbitol chewing gum or sucrose chewing gum was statistically the same. However, chewing gum, irrespective of sweetener, caused significantly less plaque accumulation than no chewing.     

Fluoride concentrations in saliva in relation to chewing of various supplementary fluoride preparations.

Fluoride concentrations were measured in whole saliva samples collected from 16 subjects at different intervals up to 60 min after chewing of various supplementary F preparations: chewable F tablets (0.21 mg F), plain F tablets (0.25 mg F) or F-containing chewing gum (0.25 mg F). Each of the F preparations was administered in a low dose (0.21--0.25 mg F) or in a high dose (0.42--0.50 mg F). Mean resting levels of fluoride in saliva ranged from 0.03 to 0.05 parts/10(6). Peak values averaging 15--25 parts F/10(6) in the low-dose group and 25--40 parts F/10(6) in the high-dose group were recorded within 5 min after intake. After 30 min, the salivary fluoride concentrations in both groups had decreased to levels below 1 part/10(6) and approached resting levels 60 min after intake. The availability of fluoride in saliva, as estimated from AUC values (areas under curves, relating fluoride concentrations to the time from 0 to 60 min), was similar with each of the preparations applied in the low dose. When used in the high dose, the chewing gum and also the plain tablets provided significantly more fluoride in saliva than the chewable tablets. The data may suggest that unflavored plain F tablets are equally suitable as a vehicle for fluoride aiming at a topical cariostatic effect as specially designed chewable tablets or chewing gum.     

Fluoride concentrations in saliva in relation to chewing of various supplementary fluoride preparations

Abstract – Fluoride concentrations were measured in whole saliva samples collected from 16 subjects at different intervals up to 60 min after chewing of various supplementary F preparations: chewable E tablets (0.21 mg F), plain F tablets (0.25 mg F) or F-containing chewing gum (0.25 mg F). Each of the F preparations was administered in a low dose (0.21–0.23 mg F) or in a high dose (0.42–0.50 mg F). Mean resting levels of fluoride in saliva ranged from 0.03 to 0.05 parts/10⁶. Peak values averaging 15–25 parts F/10⁶ in the low-dose group and 25–40 parts F/10⁶ in the high-dose group were recorded within 5 min after intake. After 30 min, the salivary fluoride concentrations in both groups had decreased to levels below 1 part/10⁶ and approached resting levels 60 min after intake. The availability of fluoride in saliva, as estimated from AUC values (areas under curves, relating fluoride concentrations to the time from 0 to 60 min), was similar with each of the preparations applied in the low dose. When used in the high dose, the chewing gum and also the plain tablets provided significantly more fluoride in saliva than the chewable tablets. The data may suggest that unflavored plain F tablets are equally suitable as a vehicle for fluoride aiming at a topical cariostatic effect as specially designed chawable tablets or chewing gum.     

Absorption of urea through the oral mucosa and estimation of the percentage of secreted whole saliva inadvertently swallowed during saliva collection

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether some of the urea added to certain chewing gums may be absorbed through the oral mucosa and whether some saliva is inadvertently swallowed during the collection of saliva elicited by the chewing of gum. DESIGN: On two occasions, 10 experienced saliva collectors made a 5 min collection of unstimulated whole saliva and then chewed gum for 10 min and during this time collected their saliva. On one occasion, they chewed one tablet of gum containing 0.5 mg of Phenol Red, a non-absorbable substance, and one tablet of a gum containing 27.3 mg of urea. On another occasion, they chewed two tablets of the Phenol Red gum. Their saliva and the chewed gum were assayed for their Phenol Red and urea contents and the totals calculated. Since saliva normally contains urea, the recovery of urea was calculated as the difference between the amounts recovered in the two collection sessions. RESULTS: The mean recovery of Phenol Red was 96.7%, but in three participants the amount recovered was less than the 95% confidence limits for assay error. The mean recovery of urea was 85.7% and in nine of the 10 participants, the amount recovered was less than the confidence limits for assay error. In all participants, the percentage urea recovery was less than that of Phenol Red. CONCLUSION: The results showed: (1) that Phenol Red appears to be a useful, non-absorbed marker for studies of drug absorption through the oral mucosa, (2) that when the salivary urea concentration is higher than that in plasma, urea may be absorbed through the oral mucosa, (3) that even experienced saliva collectors may inadvertently swallow some of the saliva they produce. This latter finding has implications for all clinical studies of saliva.     

Salivary fluoride clearance after a single intake of fluoride tablets and chewing gums in children, adults, and dry mouth patients

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the clearance pattern in saliva and the salivary stimulating effect of a new fluoride (F) chewing gum (Fluorette) with three other F products used in Scandinavia for many years for caries prevention. Concentration of F was determined in whole saliva in three groups of subjects: 1) children, 10–12 yr of age ( n = 20), 2) adults ( n = 20), and 3) dry mouth patients ( n = 15), after a single intake of the two tablets, Dentan and Fludent, and the two chewing gums, Fluomin and Fluorette, all containing 0.25 mg F as NaF. Sucking was allowed until the tablets had been completely dissolved in the mouth. The chewing gums were used for 15 min. Saliva samples were collected from subjects expectorating 0.3–0.5 ml at nine different time intervals up to 45 min after the intake. There were some significant differences in the maximum F concentration, the area under the salivary fluoride concentration curve (AUC) when plotted against time, and the salivary stimulating effect among the four products, but as a whole they were small and probably of minor clinical importance. Among the various groups, the dry mouth patients showed the highest salivary F concentration. Thus, the main conclusion from this study is that the F tablets and chewing gums studied, including the new product Fluorette, had approximately the same clearance pattern in saliva and the same salivary stimulating effect. However, there were great variations among the different subjects.