Effects of food and sucralfate on a single oral dose of 500 milligrams of levofloxacin in healthy subjects.

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), the time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (Ae) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and Cmax was slightly reduced (Tmax, 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P = 0.002]; Cmax, 5.9 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.9 microg/ml [90% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 +/- 3.2 microg/ml and 47.9 +/- 8.4 microg x h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 +/- 1.3 microg/ml and 50.5 +/- 8.1 microg x h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t1/2, CL/F, CLR, and Ae values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.     

Effects of a high-fat meal on the relative oral bioavailability of piperaquine

Piperaquine (PQ) is an antimalarial drug whose high lipid solubility suggests that its absorption can be increased by a high-fat meal. We examined the pharmacokinetics of PQ phosphate (500 mg given orally) in the fasting state and after a high-fat meal in eight healthy Caucasian volunteers (randomized crossover). Plasma PQ concentration-time profiles were analyzed by using noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. In the fed state, the geometric mean Cmax increased by 213%, from 21.0 to 65.8 microg/liter (P<0.001). The time of Cmax was not significantly different between the fasting and fed states. The geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve from zero onward (AUC0-infinity) increased by 98%, from 3,724 to 7,362 microg h/liter (P=0.006). The oral bioavailability of PQ relative to the fasting state was 121% greater after the high-fat meal (95% confidence interval, 26 to 216% increase; P=0.020). The side effects, postural blood pressure changes, electrocardiographic corrected QT interval, serum glucose, and other biochemical and hematological indices were similar in the fasting and fed states over 28 days of follow-up.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of a unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in rabbits.

A unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (LAmB) known as AmBisome was safely administered intravenously to 20 rabbits at 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg of body weight, whereas of 12 rabbits given desoxycholate amphotericin B (DAmB) intravenously at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/kg, 2 died of acute cardiac toxicity when DAmB was administered at the highest dose. Single-dose LAmB (1 mg/kg) achieved a maximum concentration in serum (Cmax) of 26 +/- 2.4 micrograms/ml and an area under the curve to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of 60 +/- 16 micrograms.h/ml, while single-dose DAmB (1.0 mg/kg), by comparison, achieved a lower Cmax (4.7 +/- 0.2 micrograms/ml; P = 0.001) and a lower AUC0-infinity (30.6 +/- 2.2 micrograms.h/ml; P = 0.07). Following administration of a single dose of LAmB (10 mg/kg), a disproportionately higher Cmax (287 +/- 14 micrograms/ml) and AUC0-infinity (2,223 +/- 246 micrograms.h/ml) occurred, indicating saturable elimination. After chronic dosing (n = 4) with LAmB at 5.0 mg/kg/day for 28 days or DAmB at 1.0 mg/kg/day for 28 days, LAmB achieved daily peak levels of 122.8 +/- 5.8 micrograms/ml and trough levels of 34.9 +/- 1.8 micrograms/ml, while DAmB reached a peak of only 1.76 +/- 0.11 microgram/ml and a trough of 0.46 +/- 0.04 microgram/ml (P < or = 0.001). Significant accumulations of amphotericin B into reticuloendothelial organs were observed, with 239 +/- 39 micrograms/g found in the liver after chronic LAmB dosing (5 mg/kg/day), which was seven times higher than the 33 +/- 6 micrograms/g after DAmB dosing (1 mg/kg/day) (P = 0.002). Accumulation in kidneys, however, remained 14-fold lower (P =0.04) following LAmB dosing (0.87 +/- 0.61 microgram/g) than after DAmB dosing (12.7 +/- 4.6 microgram/g). Nephrotoxicity occurred in only one of four LAmB treated animals, while it occurred in all four chronically DAmB-treated animals: mild hepatozicity with transaminase elevations was seen in one LAmB-treated rabbit. We conclude that LAmB safely achieved higher Cmax(s) and AUC0-infinity(s) and demonstrated saturable, nonlinear elimination from plasma via reticuloendothelial organ uptake. Take reduced nephrotoxicity of LAmB correlated with diminished levels of amphotericin B in the kidneys.     

Pharmacokinetics of acyclovir suspension in infants and children.

Eighteen children from 3 weeks to 6.9 years of age were given an oral acyclovir suspension for herpes simplex or varicella-zoster virus infections. Thirteen patients who were 6 months to 6.9 years old received 600 mg/m2 per dose, and three infants and two children less than 2 years old were given 300 mg/m2 per dose. The drug was given four times a day, except to one infant who was treated with three doses a day. Among the 13 children who received the 600-mg/m2 dose, the maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax) was 0.99 +/- 0.38 microgram/ml (mean +/- standard deviation), the time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 3.0 +/- 0.86 h, the area under the curve (AUC) was 5.56 +/- 2.17 micrograms.h/ml, and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was 2.59 +/- 0.78 h. The three infants less than 2 months of age who received the 300-mg/m2 dose had a Cmax of 1.88 +/- 1.11 micrograms/ml, a Tmax of 4.10 +/- 0.48 h, an AUC of 6.54 +/- 4.32 micrograms.h/ml, and a t1/2 of 3.26 +/- 0.33 h. The acyclovir suspension was well tolerated by young children. No adverse effects requiring discontinuation of the drug occurred.     

Pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone in patients with end-stage renal disease

The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a single 8-mg oral dose of rosiglitazone, an anti-diabetic agent, were compared in 10 long-term haemodialysis patients and 10 healthy volunteers. Haemodialysis patients received rosiglitazone 4 h after haemodialysis (non-dialysis day) and 3 h before haemodialysis (dialysis day). Haemodialysis did not influence rosiglitazone pharmacokinetics, and dialytic clearance was low (0.10 1/h). The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)), the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and the half-life for rosiglitazone were similar in haemodialysis patients (non-dialysis day) and healthy individuals (2192 +/- 598 ng.h/ml versus 2388 +/- 494 ng.h/ml, 338 +/- 114 ng/ml versus 373 +/- 95 ng/ml, and 3.70 +/- 0.75 h versus 3.81 +/- 0.86 h, respectively). AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were not markedly influenced by haemodialysis. Rosiglitazone dose adjustments are not warranted in patients with type 2 diabetes with end-stage renal failure on haemodialysis.     

Reduced oral itraconazole bioavailability by antacid suspension

AIMS: To investigate the effects of antacid suspension on oral absorption of itraconazole. METHODS: A randomized, open-labelled, two-period, crossover study with a 1-week washout period was conducted in 12 healthy Thai male volunteers. The participants were allocated in either treatment A or B in the first period. In treatment A, the volunteers were orally administered with 200 mg of itraconazole alone. In treatment B, the volunteers were administered orally with 200 mg of itraconazole co-administered with antacid suspension. Serial serum samples were collected over the period of 24 h and subsequently analysed by using a validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Time to reach maximal concentration (Tmax), maximal concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC0-infinity) were markedly decreased in antacid-treated group. Tmax for treatment A was 3.0 +/- 0.4 and 5.1 +/- 2.7 h for treatment B. Cmax and AUC0-infinity of treatments A and B were 146.3 +/- 70.5 vs. 43.6 +/- 16.9 (ng/mL) and 1928.5 +/- 1114.6 vs. 654.8 +/- 452.2 (ng x h/mL) respectively. 90% Confidence interval (90% CI) of Cmax and AUC0--infinity were 24.1-42.1 and 16.2-65.9 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rate and extent of itraconazole oral absorption were markedly decreased by concurrent use of antacid suspension. Hence, co-administration of itraconazole and antacid suspension should be avoided.     

Effects of timing of food and fluid volume on cefetamet pivoxil absorption in healthy normal volunteers.

Cefetamet pivoxil (1,000 mg orally) absorption was evaluated in 16 male subjects (age, 23.4 +/- 1.7 years; weight, 73.9 +/- 7.0 kg) 1 h before (BE), with (WI), and 1 h after (AF) a standard breakfast. The time to peak concentration of cefetamet in plasma (Tmax) was increased from 3.25 +/- 1.44 h in the BE group to 4.31 +/- 1.54 and 4.13 +/- 1.54 h in the WI and AF groups, respectively (P less than 0.05). The maximum cefetamet concentration in plasma (Cmax) and the area under the plasma cefetamet concentration-time profiles (AUC) in the BE, WI, and AF groups were 5.50 +/- 1.06, 5.47 +/- 1.4, and 6.57 +/- 0.93 micrograms/ml and 38.2 +/- 10.1, 35.7 +/- 11.9, and 42.8 +/- 6.8 micrograms.h/ml, respectively. The Cmax and AUC values were not different between the BE and WI groups (P greater than 0.05). However, differences in these values were found between the WI and AF groups (P less than 0.05). The effect of fluid volume intake on cefetamet pivoxil (1,000 mg orally) absorption was evaluated in 12 male subjects (age, 23.8 +/- 2.3 years; weight, 74.9 +/- 9.0 kg) under fasted and WI conditions. Increasing fluid volume intake from 250 to 450 ml under the fasted condition had no effect on the absorption of the prodrug (Tmax, 2.50 +/- 0.52 versus 2.83 +/- 0.94 h; Cmax, 4.89 +/- 1.04 versus 4.84 +/- 0.89 micrograms/ml; AUC, 29.6 +/- 5.1 versus 30.7 +/- 7.1 micrograms.h/ml; P greater than 0.05. Thus, independent of fluid volume intake, cefetamet pivoxil absorption is enhanced when it is given within 1 h of a meal, and it is recommended that the prodrug should be taken during this period of increased bioavailability.     

A single ascending dose study of epigallocatechin gallate in healthy volunteers

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the safety, tolerability and plasma kinetic behaviour of single oral doses of 94% pure crystalline bulk epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) under fasting conditions in 60 healthy male volunteers. In each group of 10 subjects, eight received oral EGCG in single doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg or 1600 mg, and two received placebo. Blood samples were taken at intervals until 26 h later. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of EGCG, the time taken to reach the maximum concentration (Tmax), and the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2z) of EGCG were determined. Safety and tolerability were assessed. In each dosage group, the kinetic profile revealed rapid absorption with a one-peak plasma concentration versus time course, followed by a multiphasic decrease consisting of a distribution phase and an elimination phase. The mean AUC(0-infinity) of total EGCG varied between 442 and 10,368 ng.h/ml. The according mean Cmax values ranged from 130 to 3392 ng/ml and were observed after 1.3-2.2 h. The mean t1/2z values were seen between 1.9 and 4.6 h. Single oral doses of EGCG up to 1600 mg were safe and very well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin and interaction with an antacid containing aluminum and magnesium

The pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin (400 mg orally) and the influence of the antacid aluminum magnesium hydroxide (20 ml of Maalox 70) on the bioavailability of gatifloxacin in 24 healthy volunteers were assessed. In an open, randomized, six-period crossover study, the volunteers received either gatifloxacin alone (treatments A and D); aluminum magnesium hydroxide concomitant with gatifloxacin (treatment C); or aluminum magnesium hydroxide 2 h before (treatment B), 2 h after (treatment E), or 4 h after gatifloxacin administration (treatment F). Gatifloxacin concentrations were measured by a validated bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetics of a single 400-mg dose of gatifloxacin alone were characterized as follows (mean +/- standard deviation): peak concentration (Cmax), 3.8 +/- 0. 5 (treatment A) and 3.4 +/- 0.9 (treatment D) microgram/ml; time to Cmax, 1.4 +/- 0.8 (treatment A) and 1.7 +/- 0.7 (treatment D) h; area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), 33. 5 +/- 5.9 (treatment A) and 31.4 +/- 3.4 (treatment D) microgram. h/ml; urine recovery, (83 +/- 6)% (treatment A) and (84 +/- 8)% (treatment D). Comparison of the results obtained by bioassay showed a good correlation. Aluminum magnesium hydroxide administration 2 h before (treatment B) or concomitant with (treatment C) gatifloxacin decreased the Cmax by 45% (2.1 +/- 1.2 microgram/ml) or even 68% (1.2 +/- 0.4 microgram/ml) highly significantly (P < 0.01). AUC0-infinity was significantly reduced from 33.5 +/- 5.9 to 19.4 +/- 6.9 microgram. h/ml (by 42%) or even to 11.9 +/- 3.3 microgram. h/ml (by 64%) (P < 0. 01). If aluminum magnesium hydroxide was given 2 h after gatifloxacin (treatment E), there was no significant reduction of concentration in serum but AUC0-infinity was significantly reduced from 31.4 +/- 3.4 to 25.9 +/- 5.3 microgram. h/ml (18%) (P < 0.01). Aluminum magnesium hydroxide given 4 h after gatifloxacin (treatment F) showed no influence on the gatifloxacin pharmacokinetics. Therefore, the optimal time between gatifloxacin application and the intake of an aluminum-containing antacid should be 4 h.     

Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of lomefloxacin after sequentially increasing oral doses.

The pharmacokinetics of five dose levels of lomefloxacin (100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg) were examined in a single-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 40 subjects. There were eight subjects in each group: five received active drug and three received placebo; each subject was given only one dose. All subjects completed the study, and lomefloxacin was well tolerated at all doses. No drug crystals were noted in the urine at 3 and 6 h after the dose. The mean maximum concentration in serum (Cmax) ranged from 1.11 to 7.46 micrograms/ml for the 100- to 800-mg doses, respectively, and the AUC increased proportionally with the dose. The mean time to Cmax (Tmax) values averaged 64.8 +/- 28.8 min. The elimination half-life and plasma clearance averaged 7.7 +/- 0.52 h and 259 +/- 37 ml/min, respectively. Mean concentrations in urine were highest during the first 4 h after the dose and ranged from 104 to 713 micrograms/ml following the 100- and 800-mg doses, respectively. Concentrations above 20 micrograms/ml in urine were observed in most subjects over 24 h at the three lower doses and averaged over 120 micrograms/ml during the 12- to 24-h interval at the 400-mg dose, thus supporting once-per-day dosing. Excretion rates from urine and the cumulative amount excreted increased in a dose-related fashion. Renal clearance decreased moderately at the higher doses. Thus, lomefloxacin was well tolerated, and dose proportionality was demonstrated by most pharmacokinetic parameters. The 400-mg dose produced concentrations in plasma and urine above the MIC for susceptible pathogens.     

Ofloxacin: serum and skin blister fluid pharmacokinetics in the fasting and non-fasting state

Using an agar well diffusion assay, the concentrations of ofloxacin were measured in serum and skin blister fluid after an oral dose of 300 mg given with or without a standardized meal. The apparent lag time was longer when the drug was taken with food than in the fasting state and the serum peak concentrations occurred later; the rates of absorption being 1.72 +/- 1.12/h (S.D.) and 3.40 +/- 1.56/h respectively. The mean peak concentrations of each individual in serum and blister fluid were 3.8 +/- 1.6 mg/l and 1.7 +/- 0.5 mg/l, respectively, when the drug was taken with food, compared with 4.2 +/- 1.9 mg/l and 2.1 +/- 0.7 mg/l in the fasting state. The rate of penetration into blister fluid was not influenced by the intake of food. The elimination half-life was 9.0 +/- 6.2 h in serum and 13.5 +/- 7.8 h in blister fluid when the volunteers were fasting. The corresponding values in the non-fasting state were 6.3 +/- 5.5 h and 10.6 +/- 4.6 h. The ratio of the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC0-infinity) for blister fluid and serum was 1.20 +/- 0.70 when ofloxacin was given without food and 1.03 +/- 0.34 when given with the meal.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefodizime in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites.

The pharmacokinetics of cefodizime were studied in 6 healthy male volunteers (group A) and 6 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites (group B) receiving 1 g of the drug as an i.v. bolus. Cefodizime was assayed in serum and ascitic fluid (AF) samples by a microbiological assay. The serum concentration-time curve fitted a two-compartment open model in group A and a three-compartment open model in group B. Initially, the serum level of cefodizime in group A exceeded that in group B for about 10 h; thereafter the reverse occurred until 24 h post-dosing. Cefodizime penetrated rapidly into the AF, reaching a peak at 6 h, and its AF level was still above the MIC90 for Enterobacteriaceae in most patients at 24 h post-dosing. The half-life of distribution did not differ significantly between the two groups, while the elimination half-life was prolonged significantly (p < 0.001) from 2.7 +/- 0.2 h in group A to 5.4 +/- 0.8 h in group B. The central volume of distribution (Vc) did not differ significantly in the two groups, while the terminal volume of distribution (Vp) was significantly smaller (p < 0.01) in group A (0.172 +/- 0.30 l/kg) than in group B (0.55 +/- 0.20 l/kg). The area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity serum) was significantly larger (p < 0.001) in group A [322 +/- 34 (micrograms/ml).h than in group B (180 +/- 34 (micrograms/ml).h]. The area under the AF concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity ascites) in group B was 141 +/- 37 (micrograms/ml).h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of amprenavir coadministered with grapefruit juice

In this crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers, coadministration of amprenavir (1,200 mg; single dose) with grapefruit juice slightly reduced the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) compared to administration with water (7.11 versus 9.10 microg/ml), slightly increased the time to Cmax (1.13 versus 0.75 h), and did not affect the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), the AUC(0-infinity), or the concentration at 12 h. Therefore, grapefruit juice does not clinically significantly affect amprenavir pharmacokinetics.     

Comparative oral pharmacokinetics of fleroxacin and pefloxacin

The pharmacokinetics of a single 400 mg oral dose of fleroxacin and pefloxacin were evaluated in ten healthy male volunteers in a randomized cross-over study. There were no significant differences in Tmax (0.9 vs. 1.3 h) and in plasma elimination half-life (11.9 vs. 10.8 h) between fleroxacin and pefloxacin. Cmax and AUC of fleroxacin were statistically significantly greater (P less than 0.05) compared to pefloxacin (Cmax: 5.62 vs. 4.09 mg/l, AUC0-48: 65.9 vs. 48.7 mg/l.h, AUC0-infinity: 70.7 vs. 51.5 mg/l.h). Renal clearances of fleroxacin and pefloxacin were 51.8 and 11.7 ml/min respectively. The 48-h urine recovery was 48.6% for fleroxacin, 8.6% for pefloxacin, 7.1% and 17.4% for the N-demethyl metabolites, and 3.8% and 16.6% for the N-oxide metabolites of fleroxacin and pefloxacin respectively. Urinary concentrations of both the microbiologically active parent drug and the N-demethyl metabolite of fleroxacin were, at all intervals up to 48 h post dose, two to three times higher than those of pefloxacin.     

Effect of antacid on the bioavailability of cefprozil.

The effect of antacid on the bioavailability of cefprozil was investigated in a two-way crossover study. Eight healthy male subjects received a single 500-mg oral dose of cefprozil with and without coadministration of 30 ml of an antacid suspension containing magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide (Maalox). Cefprozil consists of cis and trans isomers in an approximate 90:10 ratio. When cefprozil was administered alone (treatment A), the mean maximum concentrations (Cmax) of the cis and trans isomers were 9.2 and 1.2 micrograms/ml, respectively. When cefprozil was coadministered with Maalox (treatment B), the Cmax values of the cis and trans isomers were 8.7 and 1.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The mean values of the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) were 27.7 and 3.5 micrograms.h/ml for treatment A and 27.5 and 3.5 micrograms.h/ml for treatment B for the cis and trans isomers, respectively. The other pharmacokinetic parameters, time to Cmax, elimination half-life, mean residence time, renal clearance, and percent urinary excretion, were essentially the same for the two isomers. The respective values of the elimination half-life for the cis and trans isomers were 1.36 and 1.32 h for treatment A and 1.36 and 1.42 h for treatment B. Mean urinary excretion was 63 and 60% for treatment A and 58 and 56% for treatment B for the cis and trans isomers, respectively. No significant differences between the two treatments were found for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for either isomer. For the cis isomer, bioavailability point estimates (90% confidence intervals) of the mean Cmax and AUG0-infinity values for the Maalox treatment relative to those for the reference treatment were 95% (87%, 103%) and 99% (95%, 104%), respectively. For the trans isomer, the value were 109% (92%, 126%) for Cmax and 97% (88%, 106%) for AUC0-infinity. On the basis of the results of this study, it is concluded that the bioavailability of cefprozil is not affected by the coadministration of Maalox.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of multiple-dose valaciclovir in geriatric volunteers with and without concomitant diuretic therapy.

A randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of acyclovir following multiple-dose oral administration of valaciclovir (three times a day for 8 days) in geriatric volunteers (65 to 83 years of age). Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed for three groups: normotensive subjects given 500-mg doses of valaciclovir (n = 11), normotensive subjects given, 1,000-mg doses of valaciclovir (n = 9), and thiazide diuretic-treated hypertensive subjects given 500-mg doses of valaciclovir (n = 9). Valaciclovir, the l-valyl ester of acylclovir, was rapidly absorbed and converted to acyclovir, with plasma valaciclovir concentrations generally undetectable or < or = 0.4 microgram/ml. The peak concentration of drug in plasma (Cmax) for acyclovir occurred at 1 to 2 h, and the half-life of acyclovir was 3 to 4 h in all three elderly groups. The Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-infinity) values of acyclovir obtained on days 1 and 8 indicated no unexpected accumulation at steady state. The steady-state acyclovir Cmax (4.30 and 5.98 micrograms/ml) and daily AUC0-infinity (44 and 74 h.micrograms/ml) following dosing of valaciclovir (500 and 1,000 mg) three times a day were two to three times greater than those expected after high-dose oral acyclovir treatment (800 mg, five times daily). There were no valaciclovir-related changes or abnormalities in safety parameters and no reports of serious adverse experiences in these elderly volunteers. The plasma acyclovir concentration-time curves for the hypertensive and normotensive (500-mg valaciclovir treatment) elderly groups were almost superimposable, and acyclovir pharmacokinetic parameters for the two groups were not significantly different, indicating that concomitant thiazide diuretics do not alter acyclovir pharmacokinetics following valaciclovir dosing in the elderly. Compared with historical data for younger volunteers (creatinine clearance [CLCR] > 75 ml/min/1.73 m2), the elderly subjects (CLCR = 40 to 65 ml/min/1.73 m2) showed higher (approximately 15 to 20%) mean Cmaxs and higher (approximately 30 to 50%) mean AUC(0-infinity)s of acyclovir (P < 0.01), which were consistent with age-related decreases in CLCR. The increased acyclovir exposure from valaciclovir dosing will permit reduced dosing frequency and may result in improved efficacy in the management of herpesvirus diseases.     

Oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in patients with AIDS.

Few reports on the effects of AIDS on the absorption of orally (p.o.) administered agents exist. To help fill this informational gap, we administered ciprofloxacin to 12 patients with AIDS by two dosing regimens (400 mg given intravenously [i.v.] and 500 mg given p.o. every 12 h) in a randomized, crossover fashion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. Mean values (+/- standard deviations [SD]) for p.o. ciprofloxacin were as follows: peak concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), 2.94 +/- 0.51 microg/ml; time to Cmax, 1.38 +/- 0.43 h; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), 12.13 +/- 3.21 microg x h/ml; and half-life (t(1/2)), 3.86 +/- 0.48 h. Mean values (+/- SD) for i.v. ciprofloxacin were as follows: Cmax, 3.61 +/- 0.82 microg/ml; time to Cmax, 1.0 h; AUC(0-12), 11.92 +/- 2.92 microg x h/ml; and t(1/2), 3.98 +/- 0.94 h. The mean percent absolute bioavailability for ciprofloxacin was calculated to be 82% +/- 13%, similar to the value for healthy volunteers. We conclude that ciprofloxacin when administered p.o. to patients with AIDS is well absorbed, as evidenced by excellent bioavailability and is not affected by gastrointestinal changes in the absence of infectious gastroenteritis and severe diarrhea.     

Phase I study of multiple-dose cefprozil and comparison with cefaclor.

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and tolerance of cefprozil, to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil after administration of multiple doses of the drug, and to compare these pharmacokinetic parameters with those obtained with cefaclor. The volunteers received 28 doses of 250, 500, or 1,000 mg of cefprozil or 500 mg of cefaclor every 8 h for 10 days. Serial blood samples and the total volume of urine voided by each individual were collected for pharmacokinetic evaluation on days 1, 5, and 10. Both cephalosporins were well tolerated after multiple oral dosing. The peak levels in plasma (Cmax) of cefprozil ranged from 5.7 to 18.3 micrograms/ml after oral administration of 250- to 1,000-mg doses. The regression analysis of Cmax on cefprozil dose showed a dose-linear response. The mean Cmax of cefaclor ranged from 15.2 to 16.7 micrograms/ml and did not change significantly on multiple dosing. The overall mean terminal half-life of cefprozil was 1.2 h and was invariant with respect to dose or duration of dosing. The area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of cefprozil increased in a dose-proportional manner with an increase in dose. The overall urinary recovery (61% of dose) and renal clearance values of cefprozil were generally invariant with respect to dose and duration of dosing. While cefprozil was apparently absorbed less rapidly and achieved lower Cmax values than cefaclor, the AUC0-infinity of cefprozil was nearly twofold greater than that of cefaclor. The half-life of cefprozil was also twofold longer than that observed for cefaclor. Although the urinary recovery of cefaclor (75% of dose) was significantly higher than that of cefprozil (61% of dose), the concentrations of cefprozil in urine remained significantly higher than those of cefaclor from 2 to 8 h postdosing. If the therapeutic concept is maintained that levels of beta-lactam antibiotics in plasma should exceed the MIC for the offending organisms over a period that approximates the dosing interval, then cefprozil would appear to be suitable for twice-daily administration, whereas cefaclor should probably be administered three or even four times a day.