Inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance. Is it safe?

Several studies have looked at accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopy, image guidance, and anatomical landmarks. To our knowledge the upper thoracic spine (T1–T6) has not been specifically studied in the context of screw insertion and placement accuracy without the use of either image guidance or fluoroscopy. Our objective was to study the accuracy of upper thoracic screw placement without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance, and report on implant related complications. A single surgeon inserted 60 screws in 13 consecutive non-scoliotic spine patients. These were the first 60 screws placed in the high thoracic spine in our institution. The most common diagnosis in our patient population was trauma. All screws were inserted using a modified Roy-Camille technique. Post-operative axial computed tomography (CT) images were obtained for each patient and analyzed by an independent senior radiologist for placement accuracy. Implant related complications were prospectively noted. No pedicle screw misplacement was found in 61.5% of the patients. In the remaining 38.5% of patients some misplacements were noted. Fifty-three screws out of the total 60 implanted were placed correctly within all the pedicle margins. The overall pedicle screw placement accuracy was 88.3% using our modified Roy-Camille technique. Five medial and two lateral violations were noted in the seven misplaced screws. One of the seven misplaced screws was considered to be questionable in terms of pedicle perforation. No implant related complications were noted. We found that inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine based solely on anatomical landmarks was safe with an accuracy comparable to that of published studies using image-guided navigation at the thoracic level.     

应用椎板开窗法置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉的精确性和安全性评估

目的 分析应用椎板开窗法行胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入治疗重度脊柱侧后凸患者的精确性和安全性. 方法 1996年6月至2007年12月,应用椎板开窗法行胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入治疗23例重度脊柱侧后凸患者(A组),其中男性9例,女性14例;年龄13～23岁,平均17.8岁;术前主胸弯冠状面Cobb角平均97.3°,平均后凸角67.4°.作为对照,同期应用非开放法置钉治疗重度脊柱侧后凸患者22例(B组),其中男性7例,女性15例;年龄14～21岁,平均17.2岁;术前主胸弯冠状面Cobb角平均为96.6°,平均后凸角62.1°.两组患者术后均行CT扫描,统计螺钉置入并发症,对螺钉穿透椎弓根皮质骨的CT扫描图像进行联机测量并统计分析.结果 A组和B组各置入胸椎椎弓根螺钉209和201枚,术中发生椎弓根骨折5例和16例,发生硬膜撕裂4例和7例,螺钉错置18枚和45枚.B组螺钉错置率高于A组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).A组上、中胸椎与下胸椎之间、凸侧与凹侧之间,螺钉错置率差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组均无脊髓及大血管损伤. A和B组经平均3.2年、3.4年随访,术后冠状面和矢状面平均矫正度未见明显丢失.结论 重度脊柱侧后凸胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入技术难度较高,应用椎板开窗法可有效增加螺钉置入精确性和安全性.     

CT三维导航系统辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定技术的临床应用

目的探讨计算机CT三维导航系统辅助下进行颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定的可行性和置钉精确性。方法总结CT三维导航系统辅助下置入的159枚颈椎(C2-7)椎弓根螺钉,术后进行经椎弓根螺钉水平的CT平扫,观察椎弓根螺钉置入的精确性。同时总结X线透视引导下145枚颈椎椎弓根螺钉的置钉准确性,并与CT三维导航引导组进行对比分析。并对其中20例患者进行术中导航操作时间和精确性的监测。结果CT三维导航系统引导组螺钉置入满意率为97.5%,X线透视引导组螺钉置入满意率为91.7%,两组满意率差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。导航组位置不满意的4枚螺钉均发生于早期病例,导航系统使用熟练后未再出现置钉不满意病例。两组病例均未出现明显的神经、血管损伤并发症。术中工具注册和参考点照合时间平均3.5min(2～8min),位置误差率平均0.31mm(0.12～0.56mm,导航仪自动计算)。每枚椎弓根螺钉定位针置入所需时间平均2min(1～3.5min)。术中只需进行2次C型臂X线机透视印证螺钉定位针和螺钉置入的准确性。结论采用CT三维导航系统辅助进行颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定是可行的,与X线透视引导相比,能显著提高椎弓根螺钉置入的精确性、安全性。     

特发性脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根的CT测量及其临床意义

目的：测量特发性脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根的有关数据，探讨其临床应用价值。方法：在30例特发性脊柱侧凸患者术前CT扫描片上测量胸椎椎弓根的宽度、深度、角度、椎体旋转角度等数据，根据所得数据选定置入螺钉的直径、长度．确定置入方向和深度。术后对置入螺钉的胸椎椎弓根节段行CT扫描，判断置钉位置。结果：CT测量的各项数据显示胸椎椎弓根适合椎弓根螺钉的置入。以此为依据术中置入胸椎弓根螺钉共245枚，228枚(93％)置入无误，6枚穿破椎弓根外壁，9枚穿破椎弓根下壁，2枚穿破椎弓根内壁，无神经系统并发症。结论：术前CT扫描测量特发性脊柱侧凸患者的胸椎椎弓根的有关数据可为选择适当长度和直径的螺钉并将其准确置入胸椎椎弓根内提供参考。从而保证螺钉安全置入。     

经皮植入椎弓根螺钉的CT扫描钉道分析和临床评价

目的：通过应用经皮穿刺植入椎弓根螺钉的后路固定系统治疗胸腰段骨折患者，以探究该微创技术的准确性和可行性。方法：应用菲力浦X线荧屏透视，经皮穿刺植入导针引导的空心椎弓根螺钉136枚，后路固定系统治疗胸腰段骨折34例。术后CT扫描观察钉道与椎弓根内侧壁、外侧壁的关系，钉尖与椎体前缘的距离、TSA角、SSA角，以及进行术后的初步临床疗效观察。结果：其中椎弓根内侧壁破裂4枚，椎弓根外侧壁破裂3枚，经皮椎弓根螺钉方向过于向头端偏斜2枚，过于向尾端偏斜1枚，经皮椎弓根螺钉钉尖稍穿透椎体前缘5枚，本组经皮椎弓根螺钉植钉失误率7．25％。结论：该技术具有一定的准确性和可行性，并发症发生率相对可以接受，但有较高操作要求，需要有经验的脊柱外科医生进行。本组病例在X线荧屏透视下完成，受辐射量大，后来植钉时透视次数明显减少，患者和医师受辐射量下降而且手术时间缩短，如结合导航技术将在微创脊柱外科领域中发挥相当作用。     

Clinical evaluation and computed tomography scan analysis of screw tracts after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: An examination of the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine. Using computed tomography scan analysis after implant removal, the screw tracts could be analyzed regarding the degree and direction of screw dislocation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the misplacement rate and related clinical complications of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The feasibility of the external fixation test has been investigated in several studies. Although pedicle screw misplacement has been reported as one of the main complications, there are no reliable data on the misplacement rate for this difficult surgical procedure. METHODS: In this study, 51 consecutive patients with suspected segmental instability were investigated after external transpedicular screw insertion for the external fixation test. Computed tomography scans of all instrumented pedicles from L2 to S1 were performed after screw removal. The screw tracts were analyzed, and the direction and degree of the pedicle violations were noted. In addition, the screw and pedicle angles were measured. RESULTS: Of 408 percutaneously inserted pedicle screws, only 27 screws (6.6%) were misplaced. There were 19 medial pedicle violations, 6 lateral cortical defects, and only 1 cranial and 1 caudal displacement. With respect to the spinal level, S1 showed the highest misplacement rate, with 11 screw dislocations (12%). After surgery, found two nerve root injuries were found. Only one of the injuries (L4) was related to the malposition of a screw. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine is a safe and reliable technique. Despite the low misplacement rate of only 6.6%, it should be kept in mind that the surgical procedure is technically demanding and should be performed only by experienced spine surgeons.     

Computer navigation of parapedicular screw fixation in the thoracic spine: a cadaver study.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro study to investigate the advantages of computer assistance for the purpose of parapedicular screw fixation in the upper and middle thoracic spine. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and application accuracy of parapedicuar screw insertion with the assistance of an optoelectronic navigation system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because of anatomic limitations, thoracic pedicle screw insertion in the upper and middle thoracic spine remains a matter of controversy. The technique of parapedicular screw insertion has been described as an alternative, although the exact screw position is difficult to control. With the assistance of computer navigation for the screw placement, it might become possible to overcome these challenges. METHODS: Four human specimens were harvested for this study; 6-mm screws were inserted from T2 to T8 with the assistance of a CT-based optoelectronic navigation system. During surgery virtual images of the screw position were documented and compared with postoperative contact radiographs to determine the application accuracy. The following measurements were obtained: axial and sagittal screw angles as well as the screw distances to the anterior vertebral cortex and the medial pedicle wall. RESULTS: All 54 screws were inserted in a parapedicular technique without violation of the medial pedicle wall or the anterior or lateral vertebral cortex. The mean +/- standard deviation difference between the virtual images and the radiographs was 1.0 +/- 0.94 mm for the distance to the medial pedicle wall and 1.9 +/- 1.44 mm for the distance to the anterior cortex. The angular measurements showed a difference of 1.6 +/- 1.1 degrees for the transverse screw angle and 2.1 +/- 1.6 degrees for the sagittal screw orientation. CONCLUSION: With the assistance of computer navigation it is possible to achieve a safe and reliable parapedicular screw insertion in the upper and middle thoracic spine in vitro. The application accuracy varies for the linear and angular measurements and is higher in the axial than in the sagittal plane. It is important for the surgeon to understand these limitations when using computer navigation in spinal surgery.     

胸椎椎弓根螺钉植入位置的分区及临床意义

目的 探讨术后CT扫描对胸椎椎弓根螺钉位置分区及其临床意义。方法对64例共450枚胸椎椎弓根螺钉固定患者的临床资料进行统计分析。所有患者术后均采用手术节段椎弓根CT扫描,根据椎弓根螺钉在CT片显示的位置及可能引起的危险将其分为A、B、C三个区：A区,螺钉位置正常（椎弓根螺钉位于椎弓根中央,未穿透椎弓根和椎体,深度合适）。B区,螺钉引起椎弓根部分皮质破裂或穿透椎体前方或侧方,但没有引起严重的神经或血管损害。同时,将椎弓根螺钉偏向椎弓根外侧或上方、内侧或下方、穿透椎体前方或侧方分别划分为B1、B2、B3三个部分。C区,椎弓根螺钉位置严重偏差,直接威胁脊髓、神经根或大血管。平均随访时间25．8个月。比较胸椎不同位置使用椎弓根螺钉固定时椎弓根螺钉的准确位置及术后可能因为椎弓根螺钉位置偏差引起的并发症。结果A区共367枚（81．6％）,B区78枚（17．3％）,其中B,区40枚（8．8％）、B2区23枚（5．1％）、B3区15枚（3．4％）,C区5枚（1．1％）。从结果看T3-6节段最容易发生椎弓根螺钉的位置错误。结论根据CT扫描影像结果对椎弓根螺钉位置进行分区,有助于准确判断椎弓根螺钉的位置,预防并发症的发生。     

CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws

Purpose

Single center evaluation of the placement accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screws implanted either with fluoroscopy or under CT-navigation using 3D-reconstruction and intraoperative computed tomography control of the screw position. There is in fact a huge variation in the reported placement accuracy of pedicle screws, especially concerning the screw placement under conventional fluoroscopy most notably due to the lack of the definition of screw misplacement, combined with a potpourri of postinstrumentation evaluation methods.

Methods

The operation data of 1,006 patients operated on in our clinic between 1995 and 2005 is analyzed retrospectively. There were 2,422 screws placed with the help of CT-navigation compared to 2,002 screws placed under fluoroscopy. The postoperative computed tomography images were reviewed by a radiologist and an independent spine surgeon.

Results

In the lumbar spine, the placement accuracy was 96.4 % for CT-navigated screws and 93.9 % for pedicle screws placed under fluoroscopy, respectively. This difference in accuracy was statistically significant (Fishers Exact Test, p = 0.001). The difference in accuracy became more impressing in the thoracic spine, with a placement accuracy of 95.5 % in the CT-navigation group, compared to 79.0 % accuracy in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study underlines the relevance of CT-navigation-guided pedicle screw placement, especially when instrumentation of the middle and upper thoracic spine is carried out.     

Freehand C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique: our experience

Background

Although C1 lateral mass fixation technique is frequently performed in upper cervical instabilities, it requires the guidance of fluoroscopic imaging. The fluoroscopy guidance is time-consuming and has the risks of accumulative radiation. Biplane fluoroscopy is also difficult in upper cervical pathologic conditions because of the use of cranial fixations. This study aimed to demonstrate that unicortical C1 lateral mass screws could be placed safely and rapidly without fluoroscopy guidance.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2008, 32 C1 lateral mass screws were inserted in 17 consecutive patients with various pathologic conditions involving either atlantoaxial or occipitocervical instability.

Results

C1 screw lengths ranged from 18 to 32 mm. The atlantoaxial fixation was performed in 13 patients, and C1 lateral mass screws were added to the occipitocervical construct in 3 patients, to the posterior cervical construct in 2 patients, and to the cervicothoracic construct in 1 patient. In 2 patients, because C1 lateral mass screws could not be inserted unilaterally, C1 pedicle screw analogs were inserted. There were no screw malpositions or neurovascular complications related to screw insertion. Operation time and intraoperative bleeding of the isolated atlantoaxial fixations were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up was 32.3 months (range, 7-59 months). No screw loosening or construct failure was observed within this period. Postoperatively, 4 patients complained of hypoesthesia, whereas one patient had superficial wound infection.

Conclusion

C1 lateral mass screws may be used safely and rapidly in upper cervical instabilities without intraoperative fluoroscopy guidance and the use of the spinal navigation systems. Preoperative planning and determining the ideal screw insertion point, the ideal trajections, and the lengths of the screws are the most important points.     

Accuracy of fluoroscopically-assisted pedicle screw placement: analysis of 1,218 screws in 198 patients

Background contextWe retrospectively analyzed a total of 1,218 pedicle screws for accuracy, with postoperative computed tomography (CT), in 198 patients who were operated on between March 2004 and September 2012.PurposeTo determine the incidence of screw misplacement in patients who received a transpedicular screw fixation, with intraoperative fluoroscopy in the lateral and lateral with anteroposterior (AP) positions. The results are compared between the two groups.Study designRetrospective comparative study of accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic and lumbar spine.Patient sampleThe sample consists of 198 consecutive patients who underwent transpedicular screw fixation.Outcome measuresAccuracy of screw placement was evaluated by postoperative CT scan. Misplacement was defined in cases where more than 25% of the screw size was residing outside the pedicle.MethodsThe indications for hardware placement, radiologic studies, patient demographics, and reoperation rates were recorded. Five hundred twenty-eight screws (Group A, n=81) were inserted into the vertebral body with the assistance of lateral fluoroscopy only, whereas 690 screws (Group B, n=117) were inserted with the assistance of lateral fluoroscopy, and the final positions of the screws were checked with AP fluoroscopy.ResultsA total of 1,218 screws were analyzed, with 962 screws placed at the lumbosacral region and 256 screws at the thoracic region. According to the postoperative CT scan, 27 screws (2.2%) were identified as breaching the pedicle. Nineteen of them (3.6%) were in Group A, whereas 8 (1.16%) were in Group B. The rate of pedicle breaches was significantly different between Group A and B (p=.0052). In Group A, the lateral violation of the pedicle was seen in 10 screws (1.9%), whereas medial violation was seen in 9 screws (1.7%). In Group B, the lateral violation of the pedicle was seen in six screws (0.87%), whereas medial violation was seen in two screws (0.29%). The medial and lateral penetration of screws were significantly different between Groups A and B (p<.05). A pedicle breach occurred in 21 patients, and 15 of them underwent a revision surgery to correct the misplaced screw. Of these patients, 11 (13.6%) were in Group A, and 4 (3.4%) were in Group B (p=.0335).ConclusionsIn this study, we evaluated and clarified the diagnostic value of intraoperative fluoroscopy in both the lateral and AP imaging that have not yet been evaluated in any comparative study. We concluded that the intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, especially in the AP position, significantly decreases the risk of screw misplacement and the results are comparable with other advanced techniques.     

导航辅助脊柱胸腰段椎弓根钉植入的临床应用

目的探讨临床运用计算机影像导航技术引导脊柱胸腰段椎弓根钉植入的准确性。方法2003年5月-2007年5月，29例患者接受116枚计算机影像导航技术引导脊柱胸腰段椎弓根钉植入手术治疗，T10-T1250枚胸椎弓根钉，L1-L3 66枚腰椎弓根钉。术中记录椎弓根钉植入所需时间及C-臂透视工作次数，椎弓根钉植入完成后，即行C-臂正侧位摄片并与导航路径进行比较测量。术后CT进行椎弓根层面扫描，根据椎弓根钉与椎弓根皮质问关系分为四级：A=在椎弓根内；B=突破皮质，〈2mm；C=突破皮质，2-4mm；C=突破皮质，〉4mm。结果术后CT椎弓根位置扫描显示：A级101枚（87．07％）；B级10枚（8．62％）；C级2枚（1．72％）；D级3枚（2．59％）。1枚椎弓根钉植入平均所需时间：2．73±0．64min（1．15～4．02min）。下胸椎9枚（7．75％）胸椎弓根钉突破皮质，上腰椎6枚（5．17％）腰椎弓根钉突破皮质，且临床观察未发现与椎弓根钉突破皮质相关的神经血管等并发症。植入的椎弓根钉C-臂正侧位摄片与导航路径吻合比较，进钉点均差2．6mm（最大3．1mm），角度均差3．3°（最大5．4°）。结论计算机影像导航辅助脊柱胸腰段椎弓根钉植入，提供二维、多平面实时显示，保证了脊柱胸腰段椎弓根钉植入的准确性及安全性，明显减少放射线的暴露强度。     

Safety of thoracic pedicle screw application using the funnel technique in Asians: a cadaveric evaluation

The objective of this cadaveric study is to determine the safety and outcome of thoracic pedicle screw placement in Asians using the funnel technique. Pedicle screws have superior biomechanical as well as clinical data when compared to other methods of instrumentation. However, misplacement in the thoracic spine can result in major neurological implications. There is great variability of the thoracic pedicle morphometry between the Western and the Asian population. The feasibility of thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asians has not been fully elucidated yet. A pre-insertion radiograph was performed and surgeons were blinded to the morphometry of the thoracic pedicles. 240 pedicle screws were inserted in ten Asian cadavers from T1 to T12 using the funnel technique. 5.0 mm screws were used from T1 to T6 while 6.0 mm screws were used from T7 to T12. Perforations were detected by direct visualization via a wide laminectomy. The narrowest pedicles are found between T3 and T6. T5 pedicle width is smallest measuring 4.1 ± 1.3 mm. There were 24 (10.0%) Grade 1 perforations and only 1 (0.4%) Grade 2 perforation. Grade 2 or worse perforation is considered significant perforation which would threaten the neural structures. There were twice as many lateral and inferior perforations compared to medial perforations. 48.0% of the perforations occurred at T1, T2 and T3 pedicles. Pedicle fracture occurred in 10.4% of pedicles. Intra-operatively, the absence of funnel was found in 24.5% of pedicles. In conclusion, thoracic pedicle screws using 5.0 mm at T1–T6 and 6.0 mm at T7–T12 can be inserted safely in Asian cadavers using the funnel technique despite having smaller thoracic pedicle morphometry.     

Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis using posteroanterior C-arm rotation method

OBJECTIVE: Previous researches have emphasized the importance and difficulties in accurate thoracic pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis patients. However, there has been no report on accuracy of the insertion using posteroanterior C-arm fluoroscopy rotated to allow en face visualization of the pedicle in humans. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the thoracic pedicle screw insertion technique using a C-arm fluoroscopy rotation method for the treatment of scoliosis. METHODS: Between October 1997 and September 2005, 33 scoliosis patients who underwent surgical treatment with a total of 410 screws were analyzed. Eleven were male, 22 female and the mean age was 13.4 years. The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 59.7 degrees. Screws were inserted using the C-arm rotation method; screw positions were evaluated with postoperative computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Cobb angle of 59.7 degrees was corrected to 18.9 degrees (range, 3 to 45 degrees) in the coronal plane (mean correction rate 68%). Postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated 48 screws penetrated the medial (9 screws) or lateral (39 screws) pedicle cortex with a mean distance of 3.1 and 3.6 mm, respectively. No screws penetrated the inferior or superior cortex in the sagittal plane. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis patients using the posteroanterior C-arm rotation method allows en face visualization of both pedicles by rotating the C-arm to compensate for the rotational deformity, making it a practical, simple and safe method.     

The safety of fluoroscopically-assisted thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation for spine trauma

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw fixation is considered biomechanically superior to other stabilization constructs. However, the potential for severe complications have discouraged its use in the thoracic spine. Our goal is to determine the incidence of major perioperative complications following the placement of thoracic pedicle screws using anatomic landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients with spine fractures. METHODS: Retrospective review of 245 consecutive patients with spine fractures requiring pedicle screw fixation between T1 and T10 at a regional Level I trauma center between 1995 and 2001. Database and medical record review were used to identify the incidence of major perioperative complications. A major complication was defined as a potentially life-threatening vascular injury, neurologic deterioration, pneumothorax or hemothorax, and tracheoesophageal injury. Patients were monitored for these complications from the time of surgery until discharge. RESULTS: In all, 1,533 pedicle screws were placed between T1 and T10 in 245 patients. No patient sustained a major complication related to screw placement. Three patients (1.2%) required a secondary procedure for prophylactic revision of four (0.26%) malpositioned screws. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the safety of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine using preoperative imaging evaluation, standard posterior element landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy.     

三维重建技术在上胸椎和颈椎椎弓根螺钉植入的临床应用

目的通过应用三维重建技术辅助椎弓根螺钉的植入,评价其在上胸椎和颈椎置钉中的准确性和安全性。方法 2013年1月至2013年11月,对12例需要行上胸椎、颈椎椎弓根螺钉植入手术的患者术前通过Mimics三维重建图像设计进钉通道并获取相关参数,术中辅助植入上胸椎、颈椎椎弓根螺钉共50枚,术后CT扫描评价螺钉位置,记录有无与螺钉植入的相关并发症。结果通过Mimics三维重建植入的50枚椎弓根螺钉,47枚完全在椎弓根内,3枚穿破椎弓根壁,椎弓根穿破率为6%,植钉准确率为94%,所有穿破椎弓根壁的螺钉的穿出距离均小于2 mm,螺钉位置可接受率为100%。无一例出现螺钉植入有关的神经、血管损伤等并发症。结论 Mimics三维重建技术辅助上胸椎、颈椎椎弓根螺钉植入的置钉准确性高、安全,且明显缩短手术时间。     

Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a randomized comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques

Objective： To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw installation and its clinical benefit as compared with conventional pedicle screw installation techniques.
Methods： Total 176 thoracic pedicle screws placed in 42 thoracic fracture patients were involved in the study randomly, 20 patients under conventional fluoroscopic control （84 screws） and 22 patients had screw insertion under three dimensional （3D） computer-assisted navigation （92 screws）. The 2 groups were compared for accuracy of screw placement, time for screw insertion by postoperative thincut CT scans and statistical analysis by χ^2 test. The cortical perforations were then graded by 2-mm increments： Grade Ⅰ （good, no cortical perforation）, Grade Ⅱ （screw outside the pedicle 〈2 mm）, Grade Ⅲ （screw outside the pedicle 〉2 mm）.
Results： In computer assisted group, 88 （95.65%） were Grade Ⅰ （good）, 4 （4.35%） were Grade Ⅱ （〈2mm）, no Grade Ⅲ （〉2 mm） violations. In conventional group, there were 14 cortical violations （16.67%）, 70 （83.33%） were Grade Ⅰ （good）, Ⅱ （13.1%） were Grade Ⅱ （〈2 mm）, and 3 （3,57%） were Grade Ⅲ （〉2 mm） violations （P〈0.001）. The number （19.57%） of upper thoracic pedicle screws （ T1-T4 ） inserted under 3D computer-assisted navigation was significantly higher than that （3.57%） by conventional fluoroscopic control （P〈0.001）. Average screw insertion time in conventional group was （4.56 ±1.03） min and （2.54 ± 0.63） min in computer assisted group （P〈0.001）. In the conventional group, one patient had pleura injury and one had a minor dura violation.
Conclusions： This study provides further evidence that 3D computer-assisted navigation placement ofpedicle screws can increase accuracy, reduce surgical time, and be performed safely and effectively at all levels of the thoracic spine, particularly upper thoracic spine.     

Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance

Background contextPedicle screw malposition rates using conventional techniques have been reported to occur with a frequency of 6% to 41%. The upper thoracic spine (T1–T3) is a challenging area for pedicle screw placement secondary to the small size of the pedicles, the inability to visualize this area with lateral fluoroscopy, and significant consequences for malpositioned screws. We describe our experience placing 150 pedicle screws in the T1–T3 levels using three-dimensional (3D) image guidance.PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of 3D image guidance for placing pedicle screws in the first three thoracic vertebrae.Study designThe accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the first three thoracic vertebrae was evaluated using postoperative thin-section computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervicothoracic region.Patient sampleThirty-four patients who underwent cervicothoracic fusion were included.Outcome measuresRadiological investigation with CT scans was performed during the postoperative period.MethodsThirty-four consecutive patients underwent cervicothoracic instrumentation and fusion for a total of 150 pedicle screws placed in the first three thoracic vertebrae. All screws were placed using 3D image guidance. Medical records and postoperative imaging of the cervicothoracic junction for each patient were retrospectively reviewed. An independent radiologist reviewed the placement of the pedicle screws and assessed for pedicle breach. All cortical violations were reported as Grade 1, 0 to 2 mm; Grade 2, 2 to 4 mm; and Grade 3, greater than 4 mm.ResultsOverall, 140 (93.3%) out of 150 screws were contained solely in the desired pedicle. All 10 pedicle violations were Grade 1. The direction of pedicle violation included three medial, four inferior, two superior, and one minor anterolateral vertebral body. No complication occurred as a result of screw placement or the use of image guidance.ConclusionsUpper thoracic pedicle screw placement is technically demanding as a result of variable pedicle anatomy and difficulty with two-dimensional visualization. This study demonstrates the accuracy and reliability of 3D image guidance when placing pedicle screws in this region. Advantages of this technology in our practice include safe and accurate placement of spinal instrumentation with little to no radiation exposure to the surgeon and operating room staff.     

青少年脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性和安全性评价

目的：探讨青少年脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性和安全性，以减少相关手术并发症。方法：32例青少年脊柱侧凸患者术前均对畸形脊柱进行标准俯卧位CT加密扫描，测量进钉点至椎体前缘的深度、进针角度、椎弓根直径和椎体的旋转角度，根据测得数据确定椎弓根螺钉置入的深度和方向，置入螺钉后再行脊柱全长X线片及CT扫描评价置钉的准确性和安全性。结果：32例共置入226枚胸椎椎弓根螺钉，术后CT加密和X线片观察到205枚螺钉（90．7％）完全在椎弓根皮质骨内。10例21枚螺钉（9.3％）发生错置，7枚螺钉（3．1％）偏外，5枚螺钉（2．2％）偏前外侧（其中2枚螺钉靠近节段血管），4枚螺钉（1．8％）偏下，4枚螺钉（1．8％）直径过大导致椎弓根内壁膨胀内移，1枚螺钉（0．4％）误入椎管导致完全性脊髓损伤。T1～T4错置12枚（18．2％），T5～T12错置9枚（6．1％）；凸侧椎根螺钉置入的准确率为93．8％，凹侧为83．1％。结论：脊柱畸形患者术前应常规采用标准俯卧位CT加密扫描，根据扫描图像测得的相关数据可为术中准确置入椎弓根螺钉提供重要参考依据。在青少年脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入有一定的误置率，螺钉发生错置多见于上胸椎和凹侧．术中应高度重视。     

新型单椎单侧椎弓根导向模板辅助下颈椎椎弓根个体化置钉

目的探讨新型单椎单侧椎弓根导向模板辅助下颈椎椎弓根个体化置钉的准确性。方法对需要行颈椎后路椎弓根内固定治疗的22例下颈椎患者术前行CT扫描,根据CT扫描资料,利用逆向工程原理及快速成型技术,采用Mimics 16.0和Imageware 12.0软件,制作颈椎三维模型,并设计出个体化的新型单椎单侧椎弓根导向模板,辅助颈椎椎弓根置钉。术后复查颈椎CT评价椎弓根螺钉的位置,按照Lee et al的评定方法将螺钉在椎弓根内的位置分为4级:0级,螺钉完全位于椎弓根内;1级,穿破椎弓根的部分螺钉直径的25%;2级,螺钉直径的25%~50%穿破椎弓根;3级,穿破椎弓根的部分螺钉直径的50%。0级和1级认为置钉满意,2级和3级认为螺钉误置。结果 22例均获得随访,时间6~36个月。22例患者共置入椎弓根螺钉113枚,改为侧块螺钉固定3枚。术后复查CT提示椎弓根螺钉位置107枚为0级,4枚为1级,2枚为2级。仅2例发生误置,置钉准确率达98.2%。其中1级和2级共6枚椎弓根螺钉均穿破椎弓根外侧壁,无椎弓根内侧壁及上、下壁穿破情况。对螺钉穿破外侧壁的患者行椎动脉MRA检查,未见椎动脉损伤。患者均未出现螺钉误置导致的脊髓、神经损伤并发症。结论新型单椎单侧椎弓根导向模板辅助下颈椎椎弓根个体化置钉准确性高,相关并发症少,为下颈椎椎弓根的置入提供了一种新的方法。