Ilizarov外固定技术在复杂性踝关节融合术中的应用

目的 介绍Ilizarov外固定技术在合并有严重的病理改变的踝关节融合手术和翻修融合手术中的应用经验及临床结果。方法 总结分析1999年5月至2002年1月在澳大利亚皇家布里斯本医院进行的9例复杂性踝关节融合手术患者的病案记录和影象资料,并对患者进行随访评定,平均随访时间18．1个月。结果 9例患者均未出现血管神经损伤,伤口感染,伤口裂开不愈合等并发症,5例患者获得好结果,即关节融合稳定,残留轻度疼痛和功能限制,4例患者获得良结果,即关节融合稳定,残留中度疼痛,中度跛行或功能限制。结论 Ilizarov外固定技术即细针环形外固定架是进行复杂的踝关节融合手术时有效的固定方法之一,包括合并感染的踝关节和翻修的踝关节融合。     

Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis.

Six consecutive patients, four with failed infected ankle fusions and two with posttraumatic degenerative ankle arthritis, were treated by monofocal compression arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator. The average age was 48 years (range, 33-74 years). The average preoperative duration after failed infected ankle fusion was 18 months and for posttraumatic arthritis after fracture, 23 months. Infected failed pseudarthroses had significant fixed valgus deformity of the foot, bilateral draining sinuses, and near complete destruction and loss of the talus. Compression was dynamically applied during treatment. Custom foot plates were secured to the frame, and weight bearing as tolerated was allowed throughout the treatment period. Tibiocalcaneal fusion was obtained in three of four infected failed ankle fusions at an average of seven months (range, five to nine months). There was no evidence of infection at follow-up evaluation in these patients. One patient did not tolerate the frame and developed a fibroarthrosis. One patient sustained a refracture of the fusion at six months. Successful tibiocalcaneal fusion was obtained with reapplication of the frame and a Pappineau graft. Two primary ankle fusions healed with tibial talar fusion at an average of 3.5 months. Overall follow-up time averaged 26 months (range, 19-30 months). Six wires broke, requiring simple replacement. Four of these six were 1.5-mm wires. The Ilizarov frame may have several advantages in primary ankle arthrodesis and in the salvage of infected failed ankle fusions.     

The Ilizarov method for ankle arthrodesis

Arthrodesis of the ankle joint is indicated when conventional treatment for ankle arthrosis fails. Ilizarov proposed a technique for performing ankle arthrodesis in 1976. We review the results of several authors who have performed ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method, and compare them to results of the conventional open arthrodesis and the newer arthroscopic arthrodesis. We conclude that the Ilizarov method can be used to obtain a successful ankle fusion in the most difficult and complicated cases.     

Versatility of Ilizarov external fixator in management of foot and ankle deformity

Abstract Traditional methods of correcting foot deformities may be difficult to apply in some conditions, especially in presence of other lower limb problems. This study discusses the versatility of Ilizarov external fixator (IEF) in such cases. It was performed in 34 foot deformities in 33 patients, treated with IEF between 1997 and 1999. The average age of the patients was 15 years. The aetiology of foot deformity was recurrent congenital talipes equinovarus (n=10), neglected congenital talipes equinovarus (n=3), poliomyelitis (n=9), post-traumatic deformity (n=6), post-burn deformity (n=1), arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (n=2), and cerebral palsy, fibular hemimelia and tibial hemimelia (1 case each). Unconstrained IEF was applied for the foot in all cases. The leg construct was applied according to the target: foot deformity alone or associated with other leg problems. IEF construct was extended to the femur in cases with flexion knee deformity and hinges were added. Follow-up continued until overcorrection was maintained for the same period of correction followed by an appropriate cast for 8 weeks. The mean time for deformity correction and Ilizarov stabilisation was 16 weeks, and follow-up period was 23.1 months. The results were good in 31, fair in 2 and bad in 1. Additional procedures were performed, most often in the same operating time. Primary arthrodesis was done for 5 feet and for one revision of failed previous arthrodesis. Open corrective osteotomy for arthrodesis was performed in 2 cases. Two females were treated for flexion knee with bloodless technique. Wire-site infections, wire cut-through a calcaneum and metatarsals and fracture post-IEF removal were observed. Although it is technically difficult, IEF can be considered an effective and versatile way of treating foot and other associated lower limb problems through one-reconstruction attack.     

Knee arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique

Objectives  

Arthrodesis of the knee without or with simultaneous lengthening.     

Ankle arthrodesis using Ilizarov ring fixators: a review of 22 cases

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons are being increasingly confronted with complex ankle problems that cannot be reliably treated by conventional arthrodesis procedures. The Ilizarov technique can be an alternative salvage method in such cases. METHODS: Twenty-two Ilizarov tibiotalar arthrodeses were retrospectively reviewed. There were 16 men and six women (mean age 49 years). The underlying pathology was infection after internal fixation of ankle or plafond fractures in 16 patients, posttraumatic ankle arthritis in five, and septic arthritis after an infected Achilles tendon repair in one. Five patients had at least one failed previous arthrodesis. Primary iliac crest bone grafting was done in two patients. Proximal tibial lengthening was done in six patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were followed for an average of 29 months. A solid fusion was achieved in all patients by the end of treatment. The external fixation time averaged 27.7 (range 12 to 84) weeks. The mean time spent in a foot frame was 22.3 weeks. Complications occurred in 11 patients, including two nonunions that healed after revision and renewed frame application and four pin track infections. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Ilizarov frame provides a successful salvage method that offers solid bony fusion, optimal leg length, and eradication of infection in complex ankle pathology or failed previous arthrodesis.     

微骨折技术应用于关节镜下踝关节融合术

[目的]探讨微骨折技术应用于关节镜下踝关节融合术的临床疗效,尤其是伴有踝关节内外翻畸形时,能否通过微骨折技术提升踝关节融合率,避免关节内植骨。[方法]回顾分析2011年1月～2017年12月本科关节镜下踝关节融合术治疗的终末期关节炎患者48例。依据术前站立位踝关节正位X线片测量胫距关节面夹角,将内外翻角度在10°～20°的19例患者分为A组,将10°以内的29例患者分为B组。常规进行关节镜下踝关节融合术,术中应用微骨折技术,比较两组术后踝关节骨性融合时间和美国足踝外科学会踝-后足评分(AOFAS)等评估指标。[结果]术后2例患者出现足背前外侧感觉麻木,术后6周缓解,术后3个月感觉恢复。48例患者平均随访(25.60±7.87)个月,术后12周复查X线片提示A组患者骨性融合率与B组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后两组病例均达到骨性融合,但两组融合时间差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后末次随访时两组AOFAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。[结论]对于胫距关节面夹角内外翻在10°～20°的终末期踝关节炎患者,在关节镜辅助下踝关节融合术中应用微骨折技术可避免关节内植骨,近期临床疗效满意,但对于踝关节内外翻畸形明显时,骨性融合时间会延长。     

Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of total ankle replacement compared with that of ankle fusion continues to be one of the most debated topics in foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are sufficient objective cumulative data in the literature to compare the two procedures. A systematic review of the literature addressing the intermediate and long-term outcomes of interest in total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis was performed. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE for all relevant articles published in English from January 1, 1990, to March 2005 was conducted. Additionally, relevant abstracts from the 2003 and 2004 annual proceedings of major orthopaedic meetings were eligible. Two reviewers evaluated each study to determine whether it was eligible for inclusion and collected the data of interest. Meta-analytic pooling of group results across studies was performed for the two procedures. The analysis of the outcomes focused on second-generation ankle implants. RESULTS: The systematic review identified forty-nine primary studies, ten of which evaluated total ankle arthroplasty in a total of 852 patients and thirty-nine of which evaluated ankle arthrodesis in a total of 1262 patients. The mean AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score was 78.2 points (95% confidence interval, 71.9 to 84.5) for the patients treated with total ankle arthroplasty and 75.6 points (95% confidence interval, 71.6 to 79.6) for those treated with arthrodesis. Meta-analytic mean results showed 38% of the patients treated with total ankle arthroplasty had an excellent result, 30.5% had a good result, 5.5% had a fair result, and 24% had a poor result. In the arthrodesis group, the corresponding values were 31%, 37%, 13%, and 13%. The five-year implant survival rate was 78% (95% confidence interval, 69.0% to 87.6%) and the ten-year survival rate was 77% (95% confidence interval, 63.3% to 90.8%). The revision rate following total ankle arthroplasty was 7% (95% confidence interval, 3.5% to 10.9%) with the primary reason for the revisions being loosening and/or subsidence (28%). The revision rate following ankle arthrodesis was 9% (95% confidence interval, 5.5% to 11.6%), with the main reason for the revisions being nonunion (65%). One percent of the patients who had undergone total ankle arthroplasty required a below-the-knee amputation compared with 5% in the ankle arthrodesis group. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these findings, the intermediate outcome of total ankle arthroplasty appears to be similar to that of ankle arthrodesis; however, data were sparse. Comparative studies are needed to strengthen this conclusion.     

Radiological evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation compared to internal fixation

IntroductionWe asked whether the type of ankle joint arthrodesis stabilization will affect: (1) rate of union, (2) rate of adjacted-joint arthritis, (3) malalignment of the ankle joint.Material and methodsWe retrospectively radiological studied 62 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixator stabilization (group 1,n = 29) or internal stabilization (group 2,n = 33) from 2006 to 2015. Radiologic outcomes were mesure by: (1) rate of union, (2) rate of adjacent-joint arthritis, (3) malalignment of the ankle joint. The Levene’s test,Mann–Whitney U test and Students t-test were used to the statistical analyses.ResultsAnkle fusion was achieved in 100% of patients treated with external fixation and in 88% with internal stabilization. Desired frontal plane alignment was achieved in 100% of patients with external fixation and 76% with internal stabilization. Desired sagittal plane alignment was achieved in 100% of external fixation and 85% of internal stabilization. A total of 14 (48.3%) patients from group 1 showed a radiographic evidence of pre-existing adjacent-joint OA. The radiographic evidence of pre-existing adjacent-joint OA was also found in 27(81.8%) subjects from group 2. Alterations of adjacent joints were also found on postoperative radiograms of 19 (65.5%) patients subjected to Ilizarov fixation and in all 33 patients from group 2.DiscusionIlizarov fixation of ankle arthrodesis is associated with lower prevalence of adjacent-joint OA and ankle joint misalignment,and with higher fusion rates than after internal fixation.Although achieving a complex ankle fusion is generally challenging,radiological outcomes after fixation with the Ilizarov apparatus are better than after internal stabilization.     

Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion

Background  

Ankle arthrodesis may be achieved using the Ilizarov method. Comorbidities, such as diabetes, Charcot neuroarthropathy, osteomyelitis, leg length discrepancy, and smoking, can make an ankle fusion complex and may be associated with lower rates of healing.     

Management of diabetic neuropathic ankle arthropathy by arthrodesis using an Ilizarov frame

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a peripheral and autonomic neuropathy that typically presents as a hyperaemic event (e.g., a red, swollen foot). The diabetic Charcot ankle and foot is a potentially limb-threatening disorder that is being recognized with increasing frequency in persons with longstanding diabetes and concomitant peripheral sensory neuropathy. While considered a rare complication of diabetes, it can be a devastating complication requiring months of treatment to arrest its progression. The main problems encountered in this process are osteopenia, fragmentation of the bones of the foot and ankle, joint subluxation or even dislocation, ulceration of the skin and the development of deep sepsis. Arthrodesis using an Ilizarov external fixator is regarded as an optimal choice for the treatment of Charcot arthropathy.     

A new technique of ankle arthrodesis.

A new technique of ankle arthrodesis is described and the results of 12 consecutive procedures are assessed. The method described employs three cannulated transfixion screws and an anterior approach to the ankle. Eleven of the 12 ankles proceeded to solid fusion. One patient developed a painless fibrous non-union. There were no other significant complications. This simple technique provides good compression and adequate resistance to rotatory and angulatory stresses about the ankle fusion site.     

Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature

Complex ankle arthrodesis is defined as an ankle fusion that is at high risk of delayed and nonunion secondary to patient comorbidities and/or local ankle/hindfoot factors. Risk factors that contribute to defining this group of patients can be divided into systemic factors and local factors pertaining to co-existing ankle or hindfoot pathology. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of these risk factors and their association with patients’ outcomes after complex ankle fusions. Both external and internal fixations have demonstrated positive outcomes with regards to achieving stable fixation and minimizing infection. Recent innovations in the application of biophysical agents and devices have shown promising results as adjuncts for healing. Both osteoconductive and osteoinductive agents have been effectively utilized as biological adjuncts for bone healing with low complication rates. Devices such as pulsed electromagnetic field bone stimulators, internal direct current stimulators and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound bone stimulators have been associated with faster bone healing and improved outcomes scores when compared with controls. The aim of this review article is to present a comprehensive approach to the management of complex ankle fusions, including the use of biophysical adjuncts for healing and a proposed algorithm for their treatment.     

A technique for difficult arthrodesis of the knee

Twenty knees, in which a total of 32 previous operations had been performed, were arthrodesed by the Charnley compression technique combined with intramedullary nailing. Patients with previous infection were excluded from the series, but three neuropathic knees were included. Bony union was evident after an average of six months in all but one patient who died three months after operation. One patient developed deep infection that resolved after removing the nail. The combined technique is simple and only limited bone resection is needed; it gives immediate stability and relief of pain with minimal morbidity.     

Ilizarov ring fixator for a difficult case of ankle syndesmosis disruption.

Syndesmotic stabilization is recommended for tibiofibular diastasis, a Maisonneuve fracture, or syndesmotic instability after fixation of distal tibia-fibula fractures. In the case presented, a syndesmotic stabilization was performed with a screw inserted 2 cm above the tibiotalar joint Subsequent failure occurred due to the weight of the patient and a lack of compliance with the necessary nonweight bearing protocol. The Ilizarov frame was used to reduce and maintain a stable syndesmosis with a simple two-ring construct which allowed the patient to bear weight on the injured limb while his syndesmosis healed. This is not recommend as a routine method of treatment, but is presented as an extended indication of the Ilizarov frame for difficult cases.     

A simple technique for arthrodesis of the ankle

We report the results of a simple technique of ankle arthrodesis which is, however, indicated only when the foot can be reduced manually to a functional position. A special milling-cutter with an expulsion piston is used to obtain a cylindrical bone graft which is reintroduced having been reversed from left to right and rotated through 90 degrees. The operation is simple and very rapid. It has been performed on 72 patients, 62 of whom have been followed up for an average of six years. Fifty-seven were painless with bony fusion in a functional position; one was solid and painless but in valgus. In only four patients were the results unsatisfactory.     

The anatomic compression arthrodesis technique with anterior plate augmentation for ankle arthrodesis

The anatomic compression arthrodesis technique with anterior plate augmentation is an effective technique that results in a high union rate, improved functional outcome, and an acceptable complication rate. This technique can be used for both primary ankle arthrodesis and salvage cases with significant bone loss. The authors believe the anterior plate is a useful complement to standard multiplanar screw fixation, and the increased rigidity provided by the anterior plate effectively counters forces, particularly in the sagittal plane, that may otherwise lead to failure of multiplanar screw constructs.