Reduction of severity of pruritus after elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with subarachnoid morphine: a randomised comparison of prophylactic granisetron and ondansetron

BackgroundThe incidence of pruritus after elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with subarachnoid morphine may be 60-100%, and is a common cause of maternal dissatisfaction. Ondansetron has been shown to reduce pruritus but the effect is short-lived. The objective of this randomized double-blind trial was to evaluate the anti-pruritic efficacy of granisetron compared with ondansetron.MethodsEighty ASA I or II women undergoing elective caesarean section received spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine10 mg, fentanyl 25 μg and preservative-free morphine 150 μg. After delivery of the baby and clamping of the umbilical cord, they were randomised to receive granisetron 3 mg i.v. (group G) or ondansetron 8 mg i.v. (group O).ResultsThe two groups were similar for age, gestational age, height and weight. According to visual analogue pruritus scores, patients in group G experienced less pruritus at 8 h (P = 0.003) and 24 h (P = 0.01). Fewer patients in group G (n = 8) than group O (n = 18) required rescue anti-pruritic medication (P = 0.03). Satisfaction scores were also higher in group G than in group O (P = 0.03). There was no difference in overall incidence of pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and visual analogue pain scores between the two groups.ConclusionsAdministration of granisetron 3 mg i.v. reduces the severity of pruritus and the use of rescue anti-pruritic medication, and improves satisfaction but does not reduce the overall incidence of pruritus in women who have received subarachnoid morphine 150 μg compared to ondansetron 8 mg i.v.     

Hetastarch co-loading is as effective as pre-loading for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery

BackgroundPre-loading with hetastarch decreases the incidence and severity of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. However, pharmacokinetic studies with crystalloid predict that fluid loading should be more efficacious if rapidly administered immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare pre- and co-loading of hetastarch for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.MethodsForty-six healthy term parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery were randomized to receive 500 mL of 6% hetastarch intravenously, either slowly before spinal anesthesia (pre-loading) or as quickly as possible immediately after spinal anesthesia (co-loading). Systolic blood pressure was maintained at or above 90% of baseline with intravenous vasopressor boluses (ephedrine 5 mg/mL + phenylephrine 25 μg/mL). The primary outcome was the volume of vasopressor mix required. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and heart rate changes, time to first vasopressor use, nausea or vomiting, and neonatal outcomes (umbilical artery and vein pH, Apgar scores).ResultsThe pre-loading group used 3.5 ± 2 mL (mean ± SD) of vasopressor mixture compared with 3.2 ± 3 mL in the co-loading group (P = 0.6). There were no differences in any important maternal hemodynamic or neonatal outcome values between the two study groups.ConclusionHetastarch co-loading is as effective as pre-loading for the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Surgery need not be delayed to allow a predetermined pre-load to be administered before induction of spinal anesthesia.     

Reduction in spinal-induced hypotension with ondansetron in parturients undergoing caesarean section: a double-blind randomised, placebo-controlled study

BackgroundSubarachnoid block is the preferred method of anaesthesia for caesarean section, but is associated with hypotension and bradycardia, which may be deleterious to both parturient and baby. Animal studies suggest that in the presence of decreased blood volume, 5-HT may be an important factor inducing the Bezold Jarisch reflex via 5-HT3 receptors located in intracardiac vagal nerve endings. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ondansetron, as a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on the haemodynamic response following subarachnoid block in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section.MethodsFifty-two parturients scheduled for elective caesarean section were randomly allocated into two groups. Before induction of spinal anaesthesia Group O (n = 26) received intravenous ondansetron 4 mg; Group S (n = 26) received normal saline. Blood pressure, heart rate and vasopressor requirements were assessed.ResultsDecreases in mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group O than Group S from 14 min until 35 min. Patients in Group O required significantly less vasopressor (P = 0.009) and had significantly lower incidences of nausea and vomiting (P = 0.049).ConclusionOndansetron 4 mg, given intravenously 5 min before subarachnoid block reduced hypotension and vasopressor use in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section.     

Ephedrine versus ondansetron in the prevention of hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundMaternal hypotension is common after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. We compared the effects of prophylactic ephedrine with ondansetron on post-spinal blood pressure.MethodsOne hundred and sixty-eight term, singleton parturients were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either prophylactic intravenous ephedrine 10 mg (Group E), ondansetron 8 mg (Group O) or normal saline (Group P) immediately after spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was maternal blood pressure between spinal block and delivery; secondary outcomes were nausea and vomiting scores, Apgar scores, numbers requiring intraoperative vasoconstrictors and the dose of vasoconstrictors required.ResultsFifty-six patients were recruited to each group, but two in Group P were excluded from the analysis owing to protocol violations. There were no significant differences between the groups in maternal systolic, diastolic or mean arterial pressures, or the proportion of patients experiencing hypotension. The proportion of patients in Group E requiring intraoperative ephedrine or any vasoconstrictor (ephedrine and/or norepinephrine) was significantly lower than that in Group P (P=0.023 and 0.034, respectively). The proportion of patients in Group O requiring intraoperative norepinephrine was significantly lower than that in Group P (P=0.02). There was no difference in the proportions of patients in Groups E and O requiring any vasoconstrictors (P=0.34).ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in maternal blood pressure in women administered prophylactic ephedrine or ondansetron after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery compared with placebo. Ephedrine reduced the proportion of patients requiring a rescue vasoconstrictor before delivery.     

Role of pleth variability index for predicting hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

BackgroundHypotension is frequently observed after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section and can be detrimental to both mother and baby. We investigated the role of the pleth variability index for predicting hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.MethodsEighty-five parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. We recorded pleth variability index and perfusion index before anesthesia, and blood pressure, heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation before and after anesthesia. The association between baseline pleth variability index and perfusion index with hypotension after spinal anesthesia was explored using multivariate analysis.ResultsHypotension occurred in 42 parturients. Baseline pleth variability index was higher in parturients who experienced hypotension than in those who did not (P < 0.05), although there was no difference in baseline perfusion index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.66 for baseline pleth variability index for the prediction of hypotension (P < 0.05). Baseline pleth variability index was significantly related to the incidence of hypotension (P = 0.017), but was not significantly related to the magnitude of the decrease in systolic blood pressure. Baseline perfusion index was not significantly related to the magnitude of the decrease in systolic blood pressure.ConclusionGreater baseline pleth variability index was associated with hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, but may not be a clinically useful predictor.     

The effect of co-administration of intravenous calcium chloride and oxytocin on maternal hemodynamics and uterine tone following cesarean delivery: a double-blinded,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundOxytocin administration to prevent uterine atony following cesarean delivery is associated with adverse effects including hypotension, tachycardia, and nausea. Calcium chloride increases mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and uterine smooth muscle contractility. This study evaluated whether the co-administration of calcium chloride with oxytocin following cesarean delivery could alter maternal hemodynamics. Secondary outcomes included uterine tone and blood loss.MethodsSixty healthy parturients with singleton, term, vertex pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to one of three study solutions given intravenously immediately after umbilical cord clamping: (1) placebo, oxytocin 5 U alone; (2) CA-200, oxytocin 5 U + calcium chloride 200 mg; or (3) CA-400, oxytocin 5 U + calcium chloride 400 mg. Blood pressure, heart rate, uterine tone, vasopressor or alternate uterotonic use and the incidence of nausea or vomiting were recorded. Baseline and intraoperative plasma concentration of ionized calcium and hematocrit were measured.ResultsPlasma concentration of ionized calcium was elevated in both study groups compared with placebo (P=0.001). Blood pressure decreased and heart rate increased in all groups (P <0.0001), with no differences between groups. No differences were observed between groups in uterine tone, vasopressor use, hematocrit change, estimated blood loss, incision-to-delivery interval, delivery-to-skin closure interval, total intravenous fluid administered or incidence of nausea.ConclusionsThe decrease in blood pressure associated with oxytocin administration following cesarean delivery was not attenuated with co-administration of calcium chloride at the doses evaluated. Vasopressor use, uterine tone, and blood loss were also unaffected.     

Serum uric acid as a novel marker for uterine atony and post-spinal vasopressor use during cesarean delivery

IntroductionSerum uric acid is a marker for oxidative stress in preeclampsia. Because oxidative stress can result in diminished uterine contractility and impaired vascular relaxation, we hypothesized that an elevated serum uric acid level in women undergoing neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery would be associated with greater uterine atony, as measured by supplemental uterotonic agent use and blood loss, and less hypotension, as measured by total vasopressor use.MethodsAll records of patients (n = 2527) undergoing cesarean delivery in 2009 were reviewed. Serum uric acid was measured within 24 h of delivery in 509 patients; data from 345 patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing neuraxial anesthesia were analyzed. Demographic data, medical and obstetric history, anesthetic management and peripartum course were evaluated. ANOVA, Chi-square, and multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were performed.ResultsIncreased serum uric acid correlated positively with preeclampsia and the need for supplemental uterotonic agents (odds ratio 1.53, 95%CI 1.2–2.0, P = 0.002), but not blood loss. The presence of preeclampsia also correlated with greater supplemental uterotonic agent use (P = 0.01). The correlation between serum uric acid and post-spinal vasopressor use (i.e., none, moderate, and high) was of borderline significance (P = 0.05). In patients without diabetes, serum uric acid levels correlated inversely with post-spinal vasopressor use (P = 0.04).ConclusionsElevated serum uric acid in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia correlated with increased use of supplemental uterotonic agents and decreased use of post-spinal vasopressors. Further validation of this study is required to determine if serum uric acid in parturients can serve as a reliable predictor for higher and lower occurrences of uterine atony and spinal-induced hypotension, respectively.     

Postural change from lateral to supine is an important mechanism enhancing cephalic spread after injection of intrathecal 0.5% plain bupivacaine for cesarean section

BackgroundSpinal anesthesia is widely used for cesarean section, but the factors that affect the spread of the block in pregnant patients are still not fully explained. This study was designed to investigate the effect of postural changes on sensory block level.MethodsThirty patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. After intrathecal injection of 0.5% plain bupivacaine 7.5 mg, patients in group S were immediately placed in the supine position with left tilt, patients in group L5 were kept lateral for 5 min and then turned to the supine position with left tilt, and patients in group L10 were kept lateral for 10 min and then turned to the supine position with left tilt.ResultsAt 5 min, median cephalad level of sensory block was lower in groups L5 and L10 compared with group S (corrected P<0.001); at 10 min, median cephalad sensory block level was lower in group L10 compared with group S (corrected P<0.001) and group L5 (corrected P<0.001), and lower in group L5 compared with group S (corrected P=0.033); at 15 min, median cephalad level of sensory block was lower in group L10 compared with group S (corrected P=0.003) and group L5 (corrected P=0.015).ConclusionsIn our population, using 0.5% plain bupivacaine 7.5 mg, postural change from the lateral position to the supine position is an important mechanism enhancing cephalic spread of spinal anesthesia during late pregnancy.     

O efeito de epinefrina,norepinefrina e fenilefrina no tratamento da hipotensão pós‐raquianestesia: estudo clínico comparativo

Background and objectivesLimited data are present on safety and efficiency of epinephrine for the prophylaxis and treatment of spinal‐hypotension. This study was conducted to compare the effect of epinephrine with norepinephrine and phenylephrine on the treatment of spinal‐hypotension and ephedrine requirement during cesarean delivery.MethodsOne hundred and sixty parturients with uncomplicated pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. They were allocated randomly to receive norepinephrine 5 μg.mL^‐1 (n = 40), epinephrine 5 μg.mL^‐1 (n = 40), phenylephrine 100 μg.mL^‐1 (n = 40) or 0.9% saline infusions (n = 40) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Whenever systolic blood pressure drops to less than 80% of baseline, 5 mg of iv ephedrine was administered as rescue vasopressor. The incidence of hypotension, total number of hypotension episodes, the number of patients requiring ephedrine, the mean amount of ephedrine consumption and side effects were recorded.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in incidence of maternal hypotension between groups. The number of patients requiring ephedrine was significantly greater in group saline than in group phenylephrine (p < 0.001). However, it was similar between phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine groups. The mean ephedrine consumption was significantly higher in group saline than in norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine groups (p = 0.001).ConclusionThere is no statistically significant difference in incidence of hypotension and ephedrine consumption during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with the use of epinephrine when compared to norepinephrine or phenylephrine. Epinephrine can be considered as an alternative agent for management of spinal hypotension.     

Factors influencing cesarean delivery operative times: a prospective observational cohort study

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the distribution of operative delivery times for uncomplicated parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia. A secondary aim was to explore patient and surgical factors associated with longer cesarean delivery times.MethodsA prospective observational study of 331 parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia was conducted. Factors examined included age, body mass index, ethnicity, number of previous cesarean deliveries, stretch mark and scar severity and surgical experience.ResultsOperative times ranged from 13 to 108 min with a mean (SD) of 43.4 (±15.7) min. Only 6 (1.8%) parturients had operative times >90 min and none were converted to general anesthesia. As the number of previous cesarean deliveries increased, the mean operative time increased linearly from 39.5 (±13.0) min in subjects with no previous cesarean deliveries to 52.8 (±18.1) min in subjects with 3 or 4 previous cesarean deliveries (P < 0.0005). For parturients with previous cesarean deliveries, operative times were longer for those with scar scores ?5 than for those with scores <5 (P < 0.01). Stretch mark scores were not associated with operative times. Tubal ligation prolonged the total operative time by a mean of 7 min (P < 0.0005), and attending staff required a mean of 6 more min than residents or fellows (P < 0.01). There was no correlation between operative times, age and body mass index and little variation with ethnicity.ConclusionsThese findings identify previous cesarean deliveries, increased scar intensity, tubal ligation and surgical experience as factors that increase operative times for cesarean delivery. The data also suggest that neuraxial anesthesia lasting 90 min should provide adequate analgesia for most uncomplicated parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.     

Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study

BackgroundIn 1993, Hood and Dewan published the results of a trial comparing obstetric and anesthetic outcomes of 117 morbidly obese parturients with matched controls. The authors demonstrated a higher initial epidural anesthesia failure rate, a higher cesarean delivery rate and an increased risk of obstetric complications. We replicated the previous study to provide updated information on outcomes in the morbidly obese pregnant population. We hypothesized that morbidly obese women would still have higher complication and failure rates compared to matched controls and that general anesthesia would be less commonly used than in the previous study.MethodsThe medical records of 230 patients weighing >136 kg (300 pounds) were compared to matched controls: the next patient delivered by the same obstetrician with a weight <113 kg (250 pounds).ResultsThe mean weight of the morbidly obese group was 53.4 ± 6.6 kg/m² compared to 31.1 ± 5.4 kg/m² in the control group. Fifty percent of morbidly obese women required cesarean delivery compared to 32% of controls (P <0.01). Morbidly obese patients had a longer first stage of labor (P <0.01), larger neonates (P <0.01), and were more likely to have a failed initial neuraxial technique for labor analgesia (P <0.01). The need for a replacement procedure for labor was 17%, significantly less than 20 years ago when 42% of catheters in morbidly obese women failed (P <0.01). Failure rates of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery were similar between groups. Neuraxial procedure times were greater in morbidly obese parturients (P <0.01). Morbidly obese women were less likely to receive general anesthesia compared to 20 years ago (3% vs. 24%, P <0.01).ConclusionsMorbidly obese parturients are still at increased risk for antenatal comorbidities, failed labor analgesia, longer first stage of labor and operative delivery. Replacement labor epidural catheters and general anesthesia for cesarean delivery are less commonly required anesthetic techniques compared to the original study.     

The effect of intravenous ondansetron on maternal haemodynamics during elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: a double-blind,randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundSpinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery is frequently associated with adverse effects such as maternal hypotension and bradycardia. Prophylactic administration of ondansetron has been reported to provide a protective effect. We studied the effect of different doses of ondansetron in obstetric patients.MethodsThis prospective double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study included 128 healthy pregnant women scheduled for elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. Women were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 32) to receive either placebo or ondansetron 2, 4 or 8 mg intravenously before induction of spinal anaesthesia. Demographic, obstetric, intraoperative timing and anaesthetic variables were assessed at 16 time points. Anaesthetic variables assessed included blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, nausea, vomiting, electrocardiographic changes, skin flushing, discomfort or pruritus and vasopressor requirements.ResultsThere were no differences in the number of patients with hypotension in the placebo (43.8%) and ondansetron 2 mg (53.1%), 4 mg (56.3%) and 8 mg (53.1%) groups (P = 0.77), nor the percentage of time points with systolic hypotension (7.3% in the placebo group and 11.1%, 15.7% and 12.6% in the ondansetron 2, 4 and 8 mg groups, respectively, P = 0.32). There were no differences between groups in ephedrine (P = 0.11) or phenylephrine (P = 0.89) requirements and the number of patients with adverse effects.ConclusionsIn our study, prophylactic ondansetron had little effect on the incidence of hypotension in healthy parturients undergoing spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl for elective caesarean delivery.     

A randomized study of maternal serum cytokine levels following cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia

BackgroundCytokines are significant mediators of the immune response to surgery and also play a role in parturition. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the anesthetic technique for cesarean section on plasma levels of cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α.MethodsThirty-five parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly assigned to general (n = 18) or neuraxial (n = 17) anesthesia. The general anesthesia group received thiopental 4 mg/kg, succinylcholine 1–1.5 mg/kg and 1% end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen. The neuraxial anesthesia group received intrathecal 0.5% levobupivacaine 1.8–2.2 mL and epidural fentanyl 1 μg/kg. Blood samples were taken for IL-6 and TNF-α immediately after positioning the parturient on the operating table, after uterine incision and before the umbilical cord clamping and 24 h after surgery (T₁, T₂ and T₃ respectively).ResultsThe two groups did not differ in IL-6 (P = 0.15) or TNF-α (P = 0.73) serum concentrations at any time point. In the general and neuraxial anesthesia groups, IL-6 serum concentrations were significantly higher in the third blood sample, T₃ (12.2 ± 5.0 and 15.2 ± 4.3 pg/mL), than in T₁ (0.41 ± 0.38 and 0.29 ± 0.10 pg/mL) and T₂ (0.37 ± 0.47 and 0.24 ± 0.05) respectively (P < 0.001). Within each group, serum TNF-α concentrations did not differ significantly over time (P = 0.44).ConclusionsUnder the present study design anesthetic technique did not affect IL-6 or TNF-α concentrations in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section. Serum IL-6 levels increased 24 h postoperatively independently of anesthetic technique.     

An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial for comparison of continuous phenylephrine versus norepinephrine infusion in prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery

BackgroundDuring spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery phenylephrine is the vasopressor of choice but can cause bradycardia. Norepinephrine has both β- and α-adrenergic activity suitable for maintaining blood pressure with less bradycardia. We hypothesized that norepinephrine would be superior to phenylephrine, requiring fewer rescue bolus interventions to maintain blood pressure.MethodsEighty-five parturients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery were randomized to Group P (phenylephrine 0.1 μg/kg/min) or Group N (norepinephrine 0.05 μg/kg/min) fixed-rate infusions. Rescue bolus interventions of phenylephrine 100 μg for hypotension, or ephedrine 5 mg for bradycardia with hypotension, were given as required to maintain systolic blood pressure. Maternal hemodynamic variables were measured non-invasively.ResultsThere was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who required rescue vasopressor boluses (Group P: 65.8% [n=25] vs. Group N: 48.8% [n=21], P=0.12). The proportion of patients who received ⩾1 bolus of phenylephrine was similar between groups (Group P: 52.6% [n=20] vs. Group N: 46.5% [n=20], P=0.58). However, more patients received ⩾1 bolus of ephedrine in the phenylephrine group (Group P: 23.7% [n=9] vs. Group N: 2.3% [n=1], P <0.01). The incidence of emesis was greater in the phenylephrine group (Group P: 26.3% vs. Group P: 16.3%, P <0.001). Hemodynamic parameters including heart rate, the incidence of bradycardia, blood pressure, cardiac output, cardiac index, stroke volume, and systemic vascular resistance and neonatal outcome were similar between groups (all P <0.05).ConclusionNorepinephrine fixed-rate infusion has efficacy for preventing hypotension and can be considered as an alternative to phenylephrine.     

Comparison between colloid preload and crystalloid co-load in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundHypotension is a common problem during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Intravenous fluid loading is used to correct preoperative dehydration and reduce the incidence and severity of hypotension. Different fluid regimens have been studied but colloid preload and crystalloid co-load have not been compared.MethodsIn this randomized double-blind study, 210 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 500 mL before spinal anesthesia (colloid preload) or Ringer’s acetate solution 1000 mL administered rapidly starting with intrathecal injection (crystalloid co-load). Maternal hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80% of baseline or <90 mmHg) and severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg) were treated with 5 and 10 mg ephedrine boluses, respectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypotension, total ephedrine dose, nausea and vomiting and neonatal outcome assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood gas analysis.ResultsData analysis was performed on 205 patients; 103 in the colloid preload group and 102 in the crystalloid co-load group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypotension (52.4% vs. 42.2%; P=0.18) or severe hypotension (15.5% vs. 9.8%; P=0.31) between colloid preload and crystalloid co-load groups, respectively. The median [range] ephedrine dose was 5 [0–45] mg in the colloid preload group and 0 [0–35] mg in the crystalloid co-load group (P=0.065). There were no significant differences in maternal nausea or vomiting or neonatal outcomes between groups.ConclusionThe use of 1000 mL crystalloid co-load has similar effect to 500 mL colloid preload in reducing the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Neither technique can totally prevent hypotension and should be combined with vasopressor use.     

A comparison between post-operative analgesia after intrathecal nalbuphine with bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine after cesarean section

BackgroundAdding intrathecal opioids to intrathecal local anesthetics to decrease their doses and provide hemodynamic stability are major goals during spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Different opioids were used to select the one with the longest duration of analgesia and the least side effects. In this study, intrathecal nalbuphine was compared with intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in cesarean section.Patients and methodsSixty female patients of ASA grades I and II presented for elective cesarean deliveries with spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to 2 equal groups; Group F: 30 patients received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group N: 30 patients received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg). The onset of sensory and complete motor blockade, time of sensory blockade, duration of analgesia and motor blockade, fetal Apgar score, visual analog scale score, oxygen saturation, adverse effects and hemodynamic parameters were recorded intra-operatively and up to 4 h post-operatively. The effective analgesic time was recorded.ResultsThe onset of complete motor block was significantly more rapid in fentanyl group than in nalbuphine group. The duration of post-operative analgesia was more prolonged in nalbuphine group but the difference was insignificant. No significant difference was found between both groups as regards the duration of sensory block, motor block, duration of analgesia, fetal Apgar score, visual analog scale score, hemodynamic parameters and oxygen saturation. Adverse effects were less common in nalbuphine group but the difference was insignificant.ConclusionEither intrathecal nalbuphine 0.8 mg or intrathecal fentanyl 25 μg combined with 10 mg bupivacaine provides good intra-operative and early post-operative analgesia in cesarean section.     

Neonatal effects after vasopressor during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a multicenter,randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPlacental transfer of ephedrine causes fetal effects when compared with phenylephrine. This study compared their drug effects on neonatal parameters after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.MethodsThree-hundred-and-fifty-four women undergoing elective cesarean delivery who needed intravenous vasopressor following spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group E received boluses of ephedrine 6 mg, and Group P phenylephrine 100 µg, titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure near baseline values. Neonatal heart rates at 10 and 30–45 min of age, oxygen saturation and capillary blood glucose at 30 min, and capillary blood lactate and urine metamphetamine were recorded.ResultsNeonatal heart rate at 10 min was significantly higher (mean difference 4.0, 95%CI 0.6 to 7.3, P=0.02) in Group E versus Group P, but this was not clinically relevant. There was a linear correlation between neonatal heart rate at 10 min and ephedrine dose in Group E (r²=0.29, 95%CI 0.22, 0.74, p <0.01). The decremental changes in neonatal heart rate at 10 and 30 min were significantly greater in Group E. Urine metamphetamine tests were positive in 19% of 44 neonatal urine samples. Neonatal heart rates at 30 min, oxygen saturation, capillary blood glucose and the incidence of tachycardia, respiratory problems or abnormal glucose, were not significantly different.ConclusionsEphedrine, compared to phenylephrine as a vasopressor during cesarean delivery, was associated with higher neonatal heart rate in the early post-birth period, but without a significant difference in clinical outcomes in uncomplicated pregnancies.     

Granisetron or ondansentron to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Study objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effects of high doses of ondansetron and granisetron before spinal anesthesia on hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing elective cesarean section.DesignA double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial.SettingOperating room.PatientsA total of 120 parturients with term pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean section with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were included.InterventionsThree groups (n = 40 for each group) were formed by randomization. Five minutes before the anesthesia procedure, Group I received 8 mg intravenous (IV) ondansetron diluted in 10 ml normal saline, Group II received IV 3 mg granisetron diluted in 10 ml normal saline, and Group III received IV 10 ml normal saline.MeasurementsFollowing intrathecal drug administration, intraoperative hemodynamic changes were recorded every 2 min for 20 min and then every 5 min until the end of the operation.Main resultsTwenty patients (50%) in Group I, 12 patients (30%) in Group II, and 29 patients (72.5%) in Group III had hypotension requiring treatment with IV ephedrine (P = 0.001). The ephedrine requirement in Group III was significantly higher than in Groups I (P = 0.033) and II (P < 0.001). Also, the ephedrine requirement in Group II was lower than in Group I, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.055). The mean arterial pressure for the three groups differed in the 10th, 18th, and 60th minutes. The number of patients with nausea or vomiting was lower in Groups I and II than in Group III (P < 0.001). At 5 min, the Apgar scores were higher than 8 for all neonates. Postoperative scores for the visual analogue scale were similar for all groups.ConclusionsIt was concluded that prophylactic IV administration of 3 mg of granisetron or 8 mg of ondansetron before spinal anesthesia results in a significantly lower ephedrine requirement compared to placebo.     

Effect of preoperative Mg sulfate infusion on serum cardiac troponin (cTn) in moderate preeclamptic undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

This study was designed to investigate and compare the effect of preoperative Mg sulfate infusion on serum cardiac troponin (cTn) in moderate preeclampsia undergoing elective cesarean section. A total of fifty parturients having moderate preeclampsia scheduled for elective cesarean section were included. They were randomly allocated into two equal groups 25 each, magnesium group (GMg) received preoperative magnesium sulfate infusion and control group (GC) then both received spinal anesthesia, serum troponin measured preoperative then at 6, 12 and 24 h postoperative. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were also recorded. Baseline serum cardiac troponin was higher above normal and was comparable at the rest of times in both groups. Mean arterial pressure readings were significantly lower in GMg compared to GC at induction of spinal, skin incision and skin closure (P < 0.05) and were comparable at the rest of times. Serum cardiac troponin (cTn) levels were comparable in parturients received magnesium sulfate infusion preoperatively with those did not receive magnesium sulfate.