Risperidone in the treatment of first-episode psychotic patients: a double-blind multicenter study. Risperidone Working Group

An international, multicenter, double-blind study was conducted in 183 patients with a first psychotic episode (provisional schizophreniform disorder or schizophrenia; DSM-III-R) treated with flexible doses of risperidone or haloperidol for 6 weeks. At endpoint, 63 percent of risperidone-treated patients and 56 percent of haloperidol-treated patients were clinically improved (> or = 50% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores). Risperidone was better tolerated than haloperidol: the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms was significantly lower in the risperidone-treated patients; significantly fewer risperidone-treated patients required antiparkinsonian medication; and significantly fewer discontinued treatment because of adverse events. A post hoc analysis revealed that low doses of these antipsychotics were efficacious in some patients. Furthermore, the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms and the use of antiparkinsonian medications were significantly lower in patients receiving low doses (maximum, < or = 6 mg/day) than high doses (maximum, > 6 mg/day) of risperidone or haloperidol. These findings are consistent with the suggestion that patients with a first psychotic episode may require low doses of antipsychotic medications. Studies designed specifically to compare low and high doses of antipsychotics are warranted to help optimize treatment for these patients.     

Aripiprazole,an antipsychotic with a novel mechanism of action,and risperidone vs placebo in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole is a dopamine D2 receptor partial agonist with partial agonist activity at serotonin 5HT1A receptors and antagonist activity at 5HT2A receptors. This multicenter trial examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: In this 4-week double-blind study, 404 patients were randomized to 20 mg/d (n = 101) or 30 mg/d (n = 101) of aripiprazole, placebo (n = 103), or 6 mg/d of risperidone (n = 99). Efficacy assessments included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and Clinical Global Impression scores. Safety and tolerability evaluations included extrapyramidal symptoms and effects on weight, prolactin, and corrected QT (QTc) interval. RESULTS: Aripiprazole (20 and 30 mg/d) and risperidone (6 mg/d) were significantly better than placebo on all efficacy measures. Separation from placebo occurred at week 1 for PANSS total and positive scores with aripiprazole and risperidone and for PANSS negative scores with aripiprazole. There were no significant differences between aripiprazole and placebo in mean change from baseline in the extrapyramidal symptom rating scales. Mean prolactin levels decreased with aripiprazole but significantly increased 5-fold with risperidone. Mean change in QTc interval did not differ significantly from placebo with any active treatment group. Aripiprazole and risperidone groups showed a similar low incidence of clinically significant weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole is effective, safe, and well tolerated for the positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. It is the first non-D2 receptor antagonist with clear antipsychotic effects and represents a novel treatment development for psychotic disorders.     

International multisite double-blind trial of the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine in 175 elderly patients with chronic schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the effects of the two most commonly used atypical antipsychotics, risperidone and olanzapine, in elderly patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: In an 8-week, international, double-blind study, patients (outpatients, hospital inpatients, and residents of nursing or boarding homes) were randomly assigned to receive risperidone (1 mg to 3 mg/day) or olanzapine (5 mg to 20 mg/day). The main outcome measures were changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores and rates of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). RESULTS: Subjects were 175 patients age 60 years or over with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The mean duration of illness was 36.5 years. Median doses were 2 mg/day of risperidone and 10 mg/day of olanzapine. PANSS total scores and four of the five PANSS factor scores (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and anxiety/depression) improved significantly at all time-points and at endpoint in both groups; between-treatment differences were not significant. EPS-related adverse events were reported by 9.2% of patients in the risperidone group and 15.9% in the olanzapine group; the between-treatment difference was not significant. Total scores on the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale were reduced in both groups at endpoint; between-treatment differences were not significant. Clinically relevant weight gain was seen in both groups, but was significantly less frequent in risperidone patients than in olanzapine patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stable elderly patients with chronic schizophrenia receiving appropriate doses of risperidone or olanzapine over an 8-week period experienced significant reductions in the severity of psychotic and extrapyramidal symptoms, with a relatively low risk of side effects.     

Safety and efficacy of long-acting risperidone in schizophrenia: a 12-week, multicenter, open-label study in stable patients switched from typical and atypical oral antipsychotics

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the first long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotic, risperidone, were assessed in stable patients with schizophrenia switched from oral antipsychotic medications. METHOD: Data were collected between July 1, 2001, and October 25, 2002. The study population included patients from clinics, hospitals, and physicians' offices. After a 4-week run-in period, symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) who had been taking haloperidol (N = 46), quetiapine (N = 45), or olanzapine (N = 50) received 25 mg of long-acting risperidone. The oral antipsychotics were continued for 3 weeks after the first injection of long-acting risperidone. Injections were administered every 2 weeks at 25 mg up to a maximum dose of 50 mg for 12 weeks in this multicenter, open-label study. RESULTS: Long-acting risperidone was well tolerated. Of the 141 patients who participated in the study, the most frequently reported adverse events were insomnia (16%), headache (15%), psychosis (11%), and agitation (11%). The mean increase in body weight was 0.4 kg. No other clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities or significant electrocardiogram changes were observed during the 12-week treatment. Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale total scores were reduced during treatment with long-acting risperidone. Improvements in symptoms of schizophrenia were observed with long-acting risperidone at week 4 and continued through the 12-week treatment with significant reductions in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores at week 8 (-2.5, p <.01) and week 12 (-3.9, p <.001). At endpoint, 37% (50/135) of these stable patients were rated as clinically improved (> or = 20% decrease in PANSS total scores). CONCLUSIONS: Switching treatment from oral antipsychotics to long-acting risperidone without an intervening period of oral risperidone was safe and well tolerated. Long-acting risperidone also significantly reduced the severity of symptoms in these stable patients with schizophrenia.     

Quetiapine has equivalent efficacy and superior tolerability to risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms

Atypical antipsychotics are generally thought to be more effective than conventional agents in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia; however, there have been few direct comparisons among atypicals. We therefore investigated risperidone and quetiapine with respect to their efficacy against negative symptoms in a 12–week,double–blind, comparative pilot study involving 44 patients with schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms, as defined by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. Other efficacy measures included the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scale. Antipsychotic tolerability was assessed using the Simpson–Angus Scale (SAS) and various laboratory measures. Mean doses were 589.7 mg/ day quetiapine and 4.9 mg/day risperidone (observed cases). Both antipsychotics produced significant decreases in PANSS total, positive and negative scores, and SANS scores. Patients receiving risperidone were significantly more likely to experience extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) [p <0.05], or to require anticholinergic medication (p <0.05), and had significantly higher prolactin levels (p <0.001) than quetiapine–treated patients. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in efficacy between quetiapine and risperidone in alleviating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Quetiapine is also well tolerated, with a lower incidence of EPS and prolactin increase than risperidone.     

Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole and haloperidol versus placebo in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole is an investigational agent for treating schizophrenia that has a novel pharmacologic profile. The present study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole and haloperidol compared with placebo. METHOD: A 4-week, double-blind, randomized study, conducted at 36 U.S. centers between July 1997 and June 1998, compared aripiprazole (15 mg/day, 30 mg/day) to placebo, with haloperidol (10 mg/day) as an active control. Fixed doses of each agent were administered from day 1 throughout the study. A total of 414 patients with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized. Efficacy measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, PANSS positive, PANSS negative, PANSS-derived Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) core, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-Severity of Illness, and mean CGI-Improvement scores. Safety and tolerability evaluations included extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), weight gain, serum prolactin level, and QTc interval. RESULTS: Both doses of aripiprazole and haloperidol, 10 mg, produced statistically significant (p < or = .05) improvements from baseline in PANSS total, PANSS positive, PANSS-derived BPRS core, and CGI-Severity scores and significantly lower CGI-Improvement scores at endpoint, compared with placebo. Aripiprazole, 15 mg, and haloperidol, 10 mg, significantly improved PANSS negative score compared with placebo. Both aripiprazole doses and haloperidol separated from placebo for PANSS total scores at week 2. Unlike haloperidol, aripiprazole was not associated with significant EPS or prolactin elevation at endpoint compared with placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in mean changes in body weight across the treatment groups versus placebo, and no patients receiving aripiprazole experienced clinically significant increases in QTc interval. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole, effective against positive and negative symptoms, is a safe and well-tolerated potential treatment for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.     

Effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on hostility among patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the specific antiaggressive effects of clozapine with those of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. METHODS: A total of 157 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and a history of suboptimal treatment response were randomly assigned to receive clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol in a double-blind 14-week trial. The trial was divided into two periods: eight weeks during which the dosage was escalated and then fixed, and six weeks during which variable dosages were used. The hostility item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was the principal outcome measure. Covariates included the items that reflect positive symptoms of schizophrenia (delusions, suspiciousness or feelings of persecution, grandiosity, unusual thought content, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinations) and the sedation item of the Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE). RESULTS: Patients differed in their treatment response as measured by the hostility item of the PANSS. The scores of patients taking clozapine indicated significantly greater improvement than those of patients taking haloperidol or risperidone. The effect on hostility appeared to be independent of the antipsychotic effect of clozapine on other PANSS items that reflect delusional thinking, a formal thought disorder, or hallucinations and independent of sedation as measured by the NOSIE. Neither risperidone nor olanzapine showed superiority to haloperidol. CONCLUSION: Clozapine has a relative advantage over other antipsychotics as a specific antihostility agent.     

Depression in schizophrenia: comparison of first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different antipsychotics on depressive symptoms in schizophrenic patients. The data were drawn from a retrospective, naturalistic, observational study in which 222 subjects diagnosed as being affected by schizophrenia during a re-exacerbation phase received 6 weeks of monotherapy with fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, haloperidol, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or l-sulpiride. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Extrapyramidal Side Effects Rating Scale (EPSE) and Anticholinergic Rating Scale (ACS) were administered at baseline and six weeks after the beginning of the study; depressive symptoms were evaluated using the BPRS items "depressive mood" and "guilt feelings". All of the antipsychotic drugs led to improvements in the depressive dimension, but this was statistically significant only in the case of fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone and l-sulpiride. A clinical improvement in the depressive dimension significantly correlated with the severity of the psychotic picture and its amelioration. Female patients were significantly more likely to show an improvement in depressive symptoms. In conclusion, our findings suggest that atypical antipsychotics as a class do not seem to be more effective on the depressive dimension during the course of schizophrenia than typical ones, at least as far as the collected BPRS data are concerned. The only factor that seemed to influence the improvement in depressive symptoms during our study was gender, as females were significantly more likely to improve although there were no between-gender differences in the baseline severity of the clinical picture.     

Risperidone versus haloperidol in psychotic patients with disturbing neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms: a double-blind, multi-center trial

BACKGROUND: A randomized, double-blind, multi-center trial was started to compare the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) during risperidone and haloperidol treatment in schizophrenic patients who had disturbing EPS during their previous neuroleptic treatment. Additional objectives of this trial were comparing the antipsychotic effectiveness of the two treatments and the use of antiparkinsonian medication. METHODS: Effects of flexible doses of risperidone and haloperidol were compared in 77 psychotic patients (83% with chronic schizophrenia) with disturbing neuroleptic-induced EPS (risperidone 40 patients, haloperidol 37). The trial was completed by 47 patients: 25 in the risperidone group (12 women, 13 men), and 22 in the haloperidol group (10 women, 12 men). RESULTS: An adequate antipsychotic effect was obtained in most patients by both treatments. The primary aim of this trial was comparing parkinsonism measured with the extrapyramidal syndrome rating scale (ESRS) during treatment with risperidone and haloperidol. Two primary parameters were selected: the change from baseline to the worst score during treatment of ESRS II (parkinsonism) and ESRS VI (clinical global impression of severity of parkinsonism). The CGI of severity of parkinsonism was better with risperidone (P=0.025), while the parkinsonism total score tended to be better with risperidone (P<0. 10). Before the double-blind treatment, 34 (of the 77) had used antiparkinson medication (risperidone 18, haloperidol 16). During the double-blind treatment phase, 21 patients had used antiparkinson medication (risperidone 11, haloperidol 10). The larger reduction of parkinsonism in the risperidone group was not due to a difference in the use of anti-parkinsonian medication. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of schizophrenic patients with disturbing EPS during previous neuroleptic treatment, a stronger reduction of parkinsonism was observed with risperidone than with haloperidol.     

Rapid onset of therapeutic effect of risperidone versus haloperidol in a double-blind randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Speed of onset of therapeutic effect is an important dimension of drugs employed to treat psychosis and schizophrenia. Faster onset is desirable to reduce the anguish caused by delusions and hallucinations and to protect patients and others from the consequences of poor judgment associated with psychotic exacerbation. Although sufficient studies have demonstrated that novel antipsychotics have advantages over clinically employed doses of classic drugs in terms of tolerability and aspects of efficacy, less is known about differences in speed of onset of therapeutic effect. This report consists of a post hoc subanalysis of data from a large double-blind, randomized pivotal trial in which we compared onset of therapeutic effect between risperidone and haloperidol. METHOD: During an 8-week period, 227 patients with DSM-III chronic schizophrenia received 4 mg/day of risperidone and 226 patients received 10 mg/day of haloperidol. Symptoms were assessed 6 times (days 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56) using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance for multiple dependent variables and repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: The analyses revealed that patients receiving risperidone improved more rapidly than those receiving haloperidol as measured by PANSS total and CGI-S scores. Differences were most pronounced during the first week of treatment. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that risperidone offers a more rapid response than haloperidol, particularly during the active phase of illness when time to response can be crucial.     

Maintenance treatment of schizophrenia with risperidone or haloperidol: 2-year outcomes

OBJECTIVE: Most controlled studies comparing second-generation and conventional antipsychotics have focused on the acute treatment of schizophrenia. The authors compared symptom outcomes, side effects, and social adjustment in stable schizophrenia outpatients who received 2 years of maintenance treatment with risperidone or haloperidol. METHOD: This was a 2-year, randomized, double-blind comparison of 6 mg of risperidone versus haloperidol in 63 patients with stabilized DSM-IV schizophrenia. Study patients also received 15 months of standard behavioral skills training or enhanced training with a case manager who promoted patients' use of their skills in the community. RESULTS: The risk of psychotic exacerbations and the risk of leaving the study were similar for both drug treatment groups. However, patients who received both risperidone and the enhanced community-based skills training were more likely to remain in the study than those in the other treatment groups. Patients demonstrated significant improvement in score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale over time with both medications. There were no between-group differences in cluster scores for thought disturbance, hostile-suspiciousness, and withdrawal-retardation. A significant between-group difference favoring risperidone was found for the anxious-depression cluster. Risperidone resulted in significantly greater reductions in tremor and akathisia and greater improvements in most items on the SCL-90-R. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with patients given a low dose of haloperidol, risperidone-treated patients experienced similar improvements in positive and negative symptoms and similar risks of psychotic exacerbations. However, risperidone-treated patients appeared to feel subjectively better, as indicated by less anxiety and depression and fewer extrapyramidal side effects.     

利培酮与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症对照研究

目的 评价利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效和副作用。方法 将５９例精神分裂症住院病人随机分配到利培酮１组,利培酮２组和氯氮平组（２０例）,治疗８周。用阳性与阴性症状量表（ＰＡＮＳＳ）评定疗效,用副反应量表及锥体外系副反应量表评定副反应。结果 利培酮两个剂量组与氯氮平组之间疗效无显著性差异。在认知因子,阴性因子,ＰＡＮＳＳ总分减分率方面,利培酮组与氯氮平组有显著性差异,利培酮的副反应有锥体外系反应、失眠、     

A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of risperidone and haloperidol in Korean dementia patients with behavioral disturbances.

OBJECTIVE: Behavioral disturbances in dementia are extremely prominent and distressful, and often result in serious physical, social, and economic consequences. The authors compared the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in institutionalized elderly Korean patients with Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, or mixed dementia. METHODS: This was an 18-week double-blind, crossover study involving 120 patients who were randomly assigned to receive flexible doses (0.5-1.5 mg/day) of risperidone or haloperidol. BPSD were assessed using the Korean version of the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD-K), the Korean version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-K), and the Clinical Global Impression of Change scale (CGI-C). Safety and tolerability assessments included the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Both risperidone and haloperidol were efficacious in alleviating BPSD. However, when receiving risperidone, patients showed significantly greater improvement than when receiving haloperidol in the total and subscale scores of the BEHAVE-AD-K, the total and subscale scores of the CMAI-K, and the scores on the CGI-C scale. Also, risperidone had an additional benefit on aggressiveness and anxieties/phobias. The risk of antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism throughout this study was significantly lower with risperidone than with haloperidol. CONCLUSION: Risperidone had a favorable efficacy and tolerability profile compared with haloperidol in the treatment of BPSD in this patient population.     

Risperidone in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of risperidone compared to haloperidol in patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. METHOD: Sixty-seven medication-unresponsive subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with risperidone (N = 34) or haloperidol (N = 33). After a 3-7 day-placebo washout period, there was a 4-week, double-blind, fixed-dose comparison trial that was followed by a 4-week, flexible-dose phase. Measures of clinical change were quantified by standard psychopathologic and neuromotor instruments. RESULTS: Risperidone demonstrated clinical efficacy superior to that of haloperidol on the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) after the first 4 weeks of treatment. Risperidone did not show any advantage over haloperidol after an additional 4 weeks. Overall improvement on the BPRS at 4 weeks was significantly better for the risperidone group (24%) than for the haloperidol group (11%). Risperidone-treated subjects were significantly less likely than haloperidol-treated subjects to require concomitant anticholinergic medication after 4 weeks (20% versus 63%); they also had significantly les observable akathisia (24% versus 53%) and significantly less severe tardive dyskinesia. Baseline characteristics that correlated significantly with risperidone response were positive symptoms, conceptual disorganization, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was better tolerated and more effective in a subset of patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Positive psychotic symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects at baseline appear to be powerful predictors of subsequent response to risperidone.     

The efficacy of quetiapine vs haloperidol and placebo: a meta-analytic study of efficacy

INTRODUCTION: Atypical antipsychotics form a new class of treatment for psychotic disorders that offers advantages over conventional antipsychotics, such as haloperidol. Among these advantages is a lower risk of side effects-in particular movement disorders. The atypical antipsychotics that are currently commercially available are clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. The focus of this report is on the efficacy of quetiapine. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SELECTION: A meta-analysis was performed on three placebo- and five haloperidol-controlled clinical trials of quetiapine. Efficacy was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). In addition, a responder analysis was performed assessing patients who demonstrated a 40% improvement on the BPRS total score. RESULTS: The results showed that quetiapine was significantly (p<0.05) superior to placebo in improving psychotic symptoms. In addition, quetiapine was not significantly different from haloperidol on measures of efficacy measured by BPRS change score, but was superior to haloperidol in terms of response rate using observed case analysis (but not using last observation carried forward analysis). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports the use of quetiapine as a front-line treatment for schizophrenia.     

Adjunctive divalproex and hostility among patients with schizophrenia receiving olanzapine or risperidone

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the specific antihostility effects of atypical antipsychotic monotherapy (olanzapine or risperidone) with that of combination treatment with divalproex sodium among patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode. METHODS: A total of 249 inpatients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine plus placebo, olanzapine plus divalproex, risperidone plus placebo, or risperidone plus divalproex in a double-blind, 28-day multicenter trial. The target daily dose was 15 milligrams for olanzapine, 6 milligrams for risperidone, and up to 30 milligrams per kilogram (minimum, 15 milligrams per kilogram) for divalproex. The hostility item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was the principal outcome measure. Covariates included the PANSS items reflecting positive symptoms of schizophrenia (delusions, suspiciousness/persecution, grandiosity, unusual thought content, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinatory behavior). RESULTS: Combination treatment with risperidone or olanzapine plus divalproex was associated with different scores on the hostility item of the PANSS compared with antipsychotic monotherapy. Combination therapy had a significantly greater antihostility effect at days 3 and 7 than monotherapy. This result was not seen beyond the first week of treatment, but there was a trend toward a difference in effect for the entire treatment period. The effect on hostility appears to be statistically independent of antipsychotic effect on other PANSS items reflecting delusional thinking, a formal thought disorder, or hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: Divalproex sodium may be useful as an adjunctive agent in specifically reducing hostility in the first week of treatment with risperidone or olanzapine among patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode.     

Efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone versus risperidone in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: an 8-week, double-blind, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: More head-to-head comparisons of antipsychotics are needed to discern the relative efficacy and safety profiles of these compounds. Thus, we compared ziprasidone and risperidone in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: Patients with DSM-III-R acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to double-blind ziprasidone 40 to 80 mg b.i.d. (N = 149) or risperidone 3 to 5 mg b.i.d (N = 147) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score; secondary measures included scores on the PANSS negative sub-scale, CGI-Improvement scale (CGI-I), and PANSS-derived Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSd) total and core items. Safety assessments included movement disorder evaluations, laboratory tests, electrocardiography, vital signs, and body weight. Efficacy analyses employed a prospectively defined Evaluable Patients cohort. Treatment equivalence was conferred if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the ziprasidone/risperidone ratio of least-squares mean change from baseline was > 0.60. Data were gathered from August 1995 to January 1997. RESULTS: Equivalence was demonstrated in PANSS total scores, CGI-S scores, PANSS negative subscale scores, BPRSd total and core item scores, and PANSS total and CGI-I responder rates. Both agents were well tolerated. Risperidone exhibited a significantly higher Movement Disorder Burden (MDB) score (p < .05) and higher incidences of prolactin elevation and clinically relevant weight gain. However, compared with current recommendations, study dosing may have been high for some risperidone-treated patients (mean dose = 7.4 mg/day) and low for some ziprasidone-treated patients (mean dose = 114.2 mg/day). CONCLUSION: Both agents equally improved psychotic symptoms, and both were generally well tolerated, with ziprasidone demonstrating a lower MDB score and less effect on prolactin and weight than risperidone.     

Effectiveness and tolerability of long-acting risperidone: A 9-month open-label extension of a 12-week switching study from oral antipsychotics

Objectives. The aim of this non-randomized, single-arm, multi-center, 9-month extension study was to evaluate the maintained efficacy and tolerability of long-acting risperidone injection when we switched to it from previous oral antipsychotics in symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. Methods. A total of 98 patients who had completed a previous 12-week acute phase study were included. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). Results. The remission rate of 77.6% (76/98) at baseline and 57.1% (56/98) at the end of the study. Of patients who were in remission at baseline, 65.8% (50/76) maintained their remission state until the end. The symptom worsening rate was relatively low (11.1%), and there was no aggravation in mean PANSS total and subscale scores. Spontaneous treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported by 21 (21.4%) patients, and most commonly reported adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms (N=6, 6.1%) and insomnia (N=4, 4.1%). Extrapyramidal symptoms were significantly improved. Conclusions. Switching to long-acting risperidone injection from oral antipsychotics was a safe and well-tolerated strategy for maintaining clinical stability in symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia.     

A pilot study of the safety and efficacy of amisulpride and risperidone in elderly psychotic patients

ObjectiveThe primary objective of this randomised, active–controlled, parallel group, double-blind study was to evaluate the tolerability of treatment with either amisulpride or risperidone in elderly patients with schizophrenia aged over 65 years; evaluation of efficacy was a secondary objective.MethodsThe study included patients of either sex aged 65 years or older fulfilling DSM IV-diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorders and who presented psychotic symptoms severe enough to require antipsychotic medication. Subjects were randomly allocated to a flexible dose of either amisulpride (100–400 mg/day) or risperidone (1–4 mg/day) for six weeks following a three- to six-day placebo wash-out period. Safety assessment involved adverse event reporting, physical examination, blood pressure, heart rate and ECG monitoring, and laboratory tests. Extrapyramidal symptoms were evaluated with the Simpson–Angus Scale, Barnes Akathisia Scale and the AIMS. Efficacy parameters were changes in score on the PANSS, BPRS, CDS and MMSE scores.ResultsThirty-eight patients were randomised, 25 to amisulpride and 13 to risperidone. A total of 26 adverse events were experienced by 10 patients in the amisulpride group and five patients in the risperidone group. One patient in each group discontinued the study due to the emergence of a movement disorder. Changes in scores on the three measures of extrapyramidal symptoms were similar in the two groups. The PANSS total score decreased by 27.8% in the amisulpride group and by 29% in the risperidone group between inclusion and study end.ConclusionAmisulpride and risperidone are generally well tolerated in elderly patients with schizophrenia. Both drugs appeared to be efficacious in this study population, with no differences in efficacy being observed. However, the sample size was too low to reveal potential inter-group differences. Both these atypical antipsychotics thus appear to be suitable for the treatment of schizophrenia in the elderly.     

Extrapyramidal symptoms in unmedicated schizophrenia

Studies of spontaneous extrapyramidal symptoms, dyskinesia and parkinsonism, in unmedicated schizophrenia are of importance in understanding their underlying pathology and relation to the psychosis. This is a study of extrapyramidal symptoms using Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale for dyskinesia and Simpson-Angus Scale for parkinsonism in 143 schizophrenia patients who never received antipsychotic medication. Psychopathology was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Dyskinesia was present in 35% of patients and parkinsonism in 15%. The two disorders coexisted in 11 subjects. Orofacial dyskinesia, rigidity and tremor were common symptoms noted. There was no significant change in the rates and total scores of dyskinesia and parkinsonism with gender, age, duration of illness or age at onset of psychosis. Dyskinesia was unrelated to psychopathology. Parkinsonism score correlated positively with the motor symptom cluster of psychopathology. Dyskinesia and parkinsonism scores correlated positively with each other and parkinsonism score discriminated presence of dyskinesia. The associations between the spontaneous abnormal movements and other aspects of schizophrenia differed from those described in treated patients. Dyskinesia and parkinsonism are an integral part of the schizophrenia disease process whose relationship with other factors could be influenced by antipsychotic drug treatment.