腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行食管裂孔疝无张力修补术的临床效果. 方法 2006年8月至2009年10月我们对46例食管裂孔疝患者在腹腔镜下进行食管裂孔疝应用补片无张力修补,并同期给予部分胃底折叠术.结果 45例患者成功地在腹腔镜下进行了无张力修补,1例患者因术中出现食道损伤,中转开胸治疗.手术时间70～210min,平均90min. 术中出血10～110ml,平均25ml,均无输血.所有患者术后症状完全缓解.术后住院3～30d,平均住院日为5d.对45例患者术后进行3～25个月随访,平均12个月,未发现食管裂孔疝复发病例及有关补片并发症的发生.结论 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝无张力修补术是一种安全有效的微创方法,具有创伤少、恢复快、术后复发率低等特点.     

腹腔镜下巨大食管裂孔疝修补术13例分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜下巨大食管裂孔疝应用补片修补和部分胃底折叠术的安全性及有效性。 方法 2006年8月至2009年4月中国人民解放军总医院普通外科对13例巨大食管裂孔疝病人行腹腔镜下裂孔疝补片修补,并同期行部分胃底折叠术。 结果 12例手术成功,1例伴有短食管,手术过程中因分离食管时出现食管损伤中转开胸治疗。手术时间90~180min,平均110min。 术中出血30~120mL,平均50mL,均未输血。12例术后症状完全缓解。术后住院时间3~30d,平均6d。术后随访3~25个月,平均12个月,未发现复发病例。 结论 对于巨大食管裂孔疝,腹腔镜下补片修补是一种安全有效的方法,具有创伤少,恢复快、副反应小的特点。     

腹腔镜Ⅲ、Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝修补术54例临床分析

目的 分析腹腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝的方法和疗效.方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2021年1月东南大学附属中大医院普外科收治的54例行腹腔镜手术治疗的Ⅲ、Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝病人的临床资料,手术方式为食管裂孔疝修补术+胃底折叠术.随访观察术后疗效及并发症发生情况.结果 Ⅲ、Ⅳ型食管裂孔疝54例,包括Ⅲ型食管裂孔疝33...     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术143例临床分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的可行性和临床应用价值。 方法 对2001年6月至2010年2月天津市南开医院143例食管裂孔疝行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的资料进行分析。 结果 143例均完成腹腔镜手术,无中转开腹病例,手术时间55～210min,平均86 min;术中出血量40～150mL,平均76mL;术后住院时间3～21d,平均4.6d。术后临床症状均得到缓解,无严重并发症及死亡病例。134例得到随访,随访时间3个月至9年,平均3.8年,手术结果满意率91.67%。8例进固体食物时有轻度哽噎感,5例反酸症状复发,其中4例应用抑酸药物后可控制,1例行开腹手术治疗。结论 腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝,充分体现了手术创伤小、恢复快、安全可行、疗效可靠的特点。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术12例报告

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的可行性及临床价值。方法:为12例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中9例行胃底360度折叠术(Nissen术),3例行胃底270度部分折叠术(Toupet术)。8例使用7号丝线缝合修补疝缺口,4例应用补片修补。结果:12例手术均获成功,无一例中转开腹。手术时间62～215 min,平均(116±23)min;术中出血量10～20 ml,平均(12±2.4)ml;术后住院3～19 d,平均(5.1±1.3)d;无严重并发症发生及死亡病例。术后症状完全消失9例(75%),好转3例(25%)。结论:腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术安全,疗效确定,患者创伤小,值得临床应用。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的临床分析

目的：总结腹腔镜下应用补片行食管裂孔疝修补和部分胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝的初步经验。方法：2007年5月至2009年12月为13例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术或（和）胃底折叠术。观察术后相关并发症。结果：13例手术均获成功,无中转开放手术。手术时间130-205min,平均152min,术中基本无出血。术后第2天开始饮水,第3天开始进流质饮食。术后住院4-6d。1例直接缝合者术日晚发生气胸,经胸腔穿刺抽气消失。1例胃底折叠术患者在开始进普通饮食时有轻微吞咽困难,术后1个月临床症状消失。术后随访6-12个月,平均8.5个月,行钡餐造影或CT检查均未见复发。结论：腹腔镜下应用补片和（或）胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝安全有效,值得临床推广。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝

目的：探讨腹腔镜下行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝的临床疗效和安全性。 方法：回顾性分析2012年1月—2014年2月在我院进行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术的58例胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝患者临床资料,其中36例在腹腔镜下行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术（观察组）,22例患者行开腹手术（对照组）。观察并比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间及术后并发症发生情况,手术前及手术后4个月进行反流性疾病问卷（RDQ）调查结果。 结果：观察组手术时间、术后住院时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间均明显短于对照组（均P<0.05）;观察组术中出血量及术后并发症发生情况均明显优于对照组（P<0.05）;两组患者RDQ评分显示术后4个月症状均有不同程度的改善,观察组患者症状改善程度优于对照组患者（均P<0.05）。 结论：腹腔镜下行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝,疗效显著,安全性好,可积极应用于临床上胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝的治疗。     

腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝55例报告

目的：探讨腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝的可行性和有效性。方法2008年3月～2013年3月腹腔镜手术治疗55例食管裂孔疝,腹腔镜下完成食管裂孔疝的还纳及修补之后,进一步行胃底折叠术。结果55例均在腹腔镜下完成手术,在食管裂孔修补基础上辅以不同的胃底折叠术,其中Nissen胃底折叠术17例,Toupet 胃底折叠术19例,Dor胃底折叠术19例。3种术式的手术时间：Nissen术式（69．6±13．0）min,Toupet术式（68．0±8．2）min,Dor术式（63．8±10．1）min;3种术式的术中出血量：Nissen术式（20．0±5．8）ml,Toupet术式（20．6±9．5）ml,Dor术式（21．7±5．0）ml,无一例输血;3种术式的术后拔管时间：Nissen术式（3．1±1．1） d,Toupet术式（2．7±0．7） d,Dor术式（2．3±1．1） d;3种术式的术后住院时间：Nissen术式（9．1±4．9）d,Toupet术式（8．4±2．6）d,Dor术式（7．6±1．5）d。术后患者的临床症状均得到有效缓解,无围术期死亡,3例（5．4％）出现术后并发症,其中2例胃排空障碍,1例吞咽困难,治疗后均缓解。55例中位随访时间45个月（6～60个月）,口服钡餐造影或胃镜等检查无食管裂孔疝复发,无食管狭窄和食管憩室发生。结论腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝安全有效,可根据病人的情况选择不同的胃底折叠术。     

腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的现状与进展

食管裂孔疝是指腹腔内脏器通过膈食管裂孔进入胸腔所致的疾病。内科治疗无效时需手术治疗。随着微创外科的发展,腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术,以其术野清晰、操作灵活、创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短等优势而迅速成为治疗食管裂孔疝的金标准术式。本文综述应用腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝的现状与进展。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的初步探讨

目的探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术（Toupet手术）治疗食管裂孔疝的临床效果。方法 2009年1月～2010年5月,21例患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝（Ⅰ型9例,Ⅱ型4例,Ⅲ型6例,Ⅳ型2例）修补,采用单纯缝合膈肌脚,补片完全缝合,补片缝合加钉合等方法修补食管裂孔疝,并同期行部分胃底折叠术。结果本组患者手术均获成功,手术时间85～170min。无中转开腹及死亡病例。术后平均住院7d。术后随访1～16个月,20例临床症状完全消失,1例改善不明显,无明确复发病例。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术安全有效,应根据患者情况采用个体化的修补方式。     

腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝45例

目的探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术治疗食管裂孔疝的疗效。方法 2004年5月~2008年11月45例食管裂孔疝行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术。采用视觉模拟积分(visual analogue scales,VAS)评价术前及术后1、6、12个月胃食管反流症状,包括烧心、吞咽梗阻、反酸、胸痛、嗳气等。结果在缝合缩小食管裂孔的同时,行改良Nissen术9例,Toupet术10例,Dor术26例。无中转开腹。手术时间92~203min,平均118min。术后住院2~8d,平均2.7d。术后发生胃潴留3例,吞咽梗阻2例。术后随访1~48个月,平均21.5月,2例分别在术后1、12个月复发。胃食管反流综合症状VAS评分术前中位数5分(4~8分),术后1、6、12个月中位数均为1分,术前后比较均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术是治疗食管裂孔疝的有效方法 ,具有创伤小、恢复快的特点。     

腹腔镜在先天性食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗小儿食管裂孔疝的安全性和疗效。方法2001年9月～2008年12月对7例小儿食管裂孔疝施行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术（Nissen法）。1例因术前上消化道造影发现合并胃排空延迟,联合实施了腹腔镜幽门成形术。1例合并右腹股沟斜疝同时行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术。1例术中发现合并副脾,未给予处理。结果7例患儿均在腹腔镜下完成食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术（Nissen法）,无中转开腹者。手术时间平均94.2min（75～150min）;术中出血量平均5ml（2～10ml）,无术中术后输血者。术后24～48h进奶或进食。术后住院3～7d,平均4.5d。7例患儿术后随访6～20个月,平均12.6月。1例术后第10天出现呕吐,给予食管扩张和胃动力药物治疗后好转;1例术后1年复发,再次行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合Nissen胃底折叠术治愈;其余5例术后恢复顺利,无并发症发生。结论腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝创伤小,安全性好,疗效确切,可以联合治疗其他疾病,应注意适应证的选择。     

Open versus Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

Background:

The literature reports the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. However, its adoption as the preferred surgical approach and the risks associated with paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair have not been reviewed in a large database.

Method:

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset was queried from 1998 to 2005 for patients who underwent repair of a complicated (the entire stomach moves into the chest cavity) versus uncomplicated (only the upper part of the stomach protrudes into the chest) paraesophageal hiatal hernia via the laparoscopic, open abdominal, or open thoracic approach. A multivariate analysis was performed controlling for demographics and comorbidities while looking for independent risk factors for mortality.

Results:

In total, 23,514 patients met the inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 55% of patients underwent open abdominal, 35% laparoscopic, and 10% open thoracic repairs. Length of stay was significantly reduced for all patients after laparoscopic repair (P < .001). Age ≥60 years and nonwhite ethnicity were associated with significantly higher odds of death. Laparoscopic repair and obesity were associated with lower odds of death in the uncomplicated group.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia is associated with a lower mortality in the uncomplicated group. However, older age and Hispanic ethnicity increased the odds of death.     

Safe Esophageal Bougie Placement for Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

The increased use of laparoscopy for treatment of reflux esophagitis has been associated with a 1-8% complication rate. Perforation of the esophagus from bougie placement, wrap breakdown or too tight a wrap are some of the complications seen from this surgery. An esophageal dilator system was developed to overcome these problems. Thirty patients had an esophageal dilator system used whereby a 48F or 58F dilator was placed over a 18F orogastric tube. Intraoperative gastroscopy documented a properly created wrap. There were no esophageal perforations or morbidity associated with the dilator.     

Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience

Background and Objectives:

Hiatal hernia is a common condition often associated with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) with biologic mesh to reduce and/or alleviate GERD symptoms and associated hiatal hernia recurrence.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive LHHR procedures with biologic mesh performed by a single surgeon from July 2009 to October 2014. The primary efficacy outcome measures were relief from GERD symptoms, as measured according to the GERD–health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scale and hiatal hernia recurrence. A secondary outcome measure was overall safety of the procedure.

Results:

A total of 221 patients underwent LHHR with biologic mesh during the study period, and pre- and postoperative GERD-HRQL studies were available for 172 of them. At baseline (preoperative), the mean GERD-HRQL score for all procedures was 18.5 ± 14.4. At follow-up (mean, 14.5 ± 11.0 months [range, 2.0–56.0]), the score showed a statistically significant decline to a mean of 4.4 ± 7.5 (P < .0001). To date, 8 patients (3.6%, 8/221) have had a documented anatomic hiatal hernia recurrence. However, a secondary hiatal hernia repair reoperation was necessary in only 1 patient. Most complications were minor (dysphagia, nausea and vomiting). However, there was 1 death caused by a hemorrhage that occurred 1 week after surgery.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using biologic mesh, both with and without a simultaneous bariatric or antireflux procedure, is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option for management of hiatal hernia, prevention of recurrence, and relief of symptomatic GERD.     

腹腔镜治疗陈旧性创伤性膈疝的初步探讨

目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗陈旧性创伤性膈疝的安全性和有效性。方法回顾分析2011年3月~2014年2月我院收治陈旧性创伤性膈疝5例资料,男3例,女2例,年龄20~47岁,中位年龄36岁。车祸伤4例,高空坠落伤1例。术前均经CT确诊。采用腹腔镜手术,还纳疝入的腹腔器官,采用不可吸收线间断缝合修补膈肌缺损,4例缺损无法缝合修补,采用补片修补。结果 5例手术均成功实施,手术时间74~210 min,平均135 min;手术出血量10~70 ml,平均24 ml;术后住院时间4~8 d,平均6 d。随访3~36个月,平均19.5月,未发现膈疝复发。结论腹腔镜治疗陈旧性创伤性膈疝具有创伤小、术后恢复快、术后并发症少等优点,是治疗创伤性膈疝的有效手术方式。     

Vagotomy During Hiatal Hernia Repair: A Benign Esophageal Lengthening Procedure

Introduction  This study describes the use of vagotomy in patients during complex laparoscopic esophageal surgery (e.g., reoperative antireflux surgery (rLARS) or paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair) when, after extensive esophageal mobilization, the gastroesophageal junction cannot be made to reach the abdomen without tension. In doing so, we hope to understand the risk incurred by vagus nerve division in this setting in order to evaluate its role in managing the short esophagus. Methods  One hundred and sixty-six patients underwent rLARS or PEH repair between 1/1998 and 6/2003 at our institution. Clinical data was obtained from a prospectively maintained database and systematic patient questionnaires administered for this study. Follow-up was available for 102 (61%) of these patients, at a median of 19 months (range 6–69 months). Results  Fifty-two patients underwent rLARS while 50 patients underwent PEH repair. Thirty patients had a vagotomy during the course of their operation (Vag Group; 20 anterior, six posterior, four bilateral), 13 in the rLARS group (25%), and 17 in the PEH group (34%). The primary presenting symptoms for rLARS and PEH repair patients were improved in 89% in the Vag Group and 91% in the No Vag Group. Similarly, there was no difference in the severity of abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, or early satiety between the Vag and No Vag groups at follow-up. No patient required a subsequent operation for gastric outlet obstruction. Conclusions  Vagotomy during rLARS and PEH repair does not lead to a higher rate delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome, or other side effects. Thus, we propose vagotomy to be a legitimate alternative to Collis gastroplasty when extensive mobilization of the esophagus fails to provide adequate esophageal length. Presented at the annual meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Ailmentary Tract New Orleans, 2004 This work was supported in part by the Mary and Dennis Wise Fund.     

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. How I do it

Introduction  The approach to paraesophageal hernias has changed radically over the last 15 years, both in terms of indications for the repair and of surgical technique. Discussion  Today we operate mostly on patients who are symptomatic and the laparoscopic repair has replaced in most cases the open approach through either a laparotomy or a thoracotomy. The following describes a step by step approach to the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Diego, California, May 17–21, 2008     

腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术的临床疗效评价

目的:评价腹腔镜Nissen手术在治疗食管裂孔疝中的优越性。方法:应用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术治疗31例食管裂孔疝患者。结果:本组患者手术均获成功,仅1例发生纵隔气肿。术后随访6个月~7年,临床症状完全消失,无一例复发。结论:腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术具有患者创伤小、痛苦少、住院时间短等优点,是当今治疗食管裂孔疝手术的金标准。