Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study

OBJECTIVE: This phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Chemonaive patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed FIGO stage III or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on Days 1 (after cisplatin) and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Of the 42 female patients (median age 60 years) enrolled, 81% had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. Among the 37 response-evaluable patients, there were 5 (13.5%) pathological complete responses (CRs), 16 (43.2%) pathological partial responses (PRs), and 3 (8.1%) clinical PRs, for an overall response rate of 64.9% (95% CI: 47.4-79.8%) and a pathological response rate of 56.8%. Per an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 57.1% (95% CI: 41.0-72.3%). After a median follow-up time of 15.8 months, the median survival was 24.0 months and median progression-free survival was 13.4 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 69.0 and 33.3% of patients, respectively, with no febrile neutropenia or hemorrhage. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 35.7% and grade 3 alopecia in 21.4% of the patients. One patient died due to a toxicity-related death (dyspnea). CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Further clinical trials adding gemcitabine to first-line treatment seem warranted.     

拓扑替康联合顺铂治疗卵巢上皮性癌的临床研究

目的 探讨拓扑替康联合顺铂（TP）治疗卵巢上皮性癌（卵巢癌）的疗效、毒副反应及预后。方法 将手术后经病理检查确诊为Ⅱ～Ⅳ期卵巢癌的94例患者分为3组：（1）TP组：30例,给予顺铂75mg／m^2,第1天;拓扑替康0．75mg·m^-2·d^-1,第1～5天。（2）紫杉醇＋卡铂（TC）组：31例,卡铂剂量按（血浆浓度-时间）曲线下面积（AUC）=5给予,第1天;紫杉醇135mg／m^2,第1天。（3）环磷酰胺＋顺铂（PC）组：33例,给予顺铂75mg／m^2,第1天;环磷酰胺500mg／m^2,第1天。3组患者均以21～28d为1个化疗周期,6～8个疗程后评价疗效,完全缓解（CR）加部分缓解（PR）为有效。比较3组患者的疗效、毒副反应及预后。结果 （1）化疗反应率：TP组CR为8例,PR为13例,有效率为70％（21／30）;TC组CR为10例,PR为14例,有效率为77％（24／31）;PC组CR为5例,PR为9例,有效率为42％（14／33）。TP组有效率与TC组相比,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;与PC组相比,差异则有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。（2）无瘤生存率：中位随访时间25个月,TP、TC、PC组患者1年无瘤生存率分别为67％、71％、42％;2年无瘤生存率分别为57％、64％、39％。各组间1年及2年无瘤生存率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。（3）总生存率：TP、TC、PC组1年总生存率分别为93％、97％、91％;2年总生存率分别为77％、84％、67％。各组间1年及2年总生存率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。（4）毒副反应：发生Ⅲ～Ⅳ度骨髓抑制的患者,TP组为18例（60％）,TC组为8例（26％）,PC组为10例（30％）,TP组分别与TC、PC组比较,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;其他毒副反应,3组间比较,差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论 作为卵巢癌的一线化疗方案,TP方案虽不能取代TC方案,但可作为临床治疗的一种选择。     

Response and toxicity to topotecan in sensitive ovarian cancer cases with small residual disease after first-line treatment with carboplatinum and paclitaxel

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this open uncontrolled study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of topotecan in ovarian cancer cases with microscopic small residual disease to a first-line treatment, given as sequential treatment, including carboplatinum and paclitaxel. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were laparotomically or laparoscopically documented microscopic or macroscopic (<2 cm) residual disease after first-line chemotherapy including carboplatinum plus paclitaxel in patients with histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage III or IV at first diagnosis. All patients had a response >50% after first-line treatment. Eligible patients received 1.25 mg/m(2)/day of topotecan intravenously as a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days every 21 days for four cycles. A total of 38 women entered the study. Surgical "third-look" laparotomy or laparoscopy was performed in patients without clinical/instrumental evidence of progressive disease within 1 month from the last topotecan administration. RESULTS: A complete response was observed in 10 cases (28.6%, 95% confidence interval, based on the Poisson's approximation, 15.6-59. 5), a partial response in 1 (2.5%), progressive disease in 11 (31. 4%) and no change/stable disease in 13. The median duration of response was 8 months (range 5-20). The overall 1-year survival after treatment was 82.8% (SE 6.4). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that sequential therapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel followed by topotecan, all given at standard doses, is feasible and provides favorable response rates.     

Neurotoxicity of cisplatin +/− reduced glutathione in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

Several drugs have been proposed for chemoprevention from cisplatin (CDDP)-induced neurotoxicity. For the purpose of this study the effectiveness of reduced glutathione (GSH) during CDDP-based first-line treatment was evaluated in a series of 54 patients affected by epithelial ovarian cancer. Neurotoxicity was assessed by clinical examination, vibrametry and neurophysiology before, during and after chemotherapy. First of all, it is noteworthy that GSH cotreatment did not impair CDDP antineoplastic effectiveness. Non-neurological side effects were similar in the two groups, with the exclusion of oliguria which occured more frequently in CDDP alone-treated patients. From a neurological point of view, the comparison between CDDP alone and CDDP+GSH treated groups at the end of treatment (CDDP total dose 500–675 mg m⁻²) constantly evidenced a trend toward less severe neurotoxicity after cotreatment with all methods. Although neuroprotection was not complete, these findings are in agreement with previous preclinical and clinical data and further support the view that chemoprevention with GSH should be considered in CDDP-treated patients.     

Prolonged stabilization of platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer with topotecan: a case report and review of the literature

A combination of a paclitaxel and platinum analog is currently the standard first-line chemotherapy for women with ovarian cancer, with response rates of 20-37%. As patients who relapse have a poor prognosis and treatment options are limited, there is an urgent need to develop new agents with novel mechanisms of action for use as a second-line, non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. In this report, we describe a patient with platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer who received topotecan and reached long-term stabilization of her disease. The patient was administered 1.5 mg/m2 topotecan for five days in 17 cycles. She was also given granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support to prevent severe granulocytopenia; no hematologic toxic effect was experienced. Her quality of life was good throughout the treatment, and also her daily activities were unaffected.     

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM: Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days. METHODS: Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.     

Crossover study with cisplatin or carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer

Fifty-seven patients who had progressed during or relapsed after randomized first-line combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin or carboplatin were entered into a crossover study in which the analog not previously assigned was administered alone as salvage treatment. Carboplatin and cisplatin were administered at doses of 400 and 100 mg/m2, respectively, every 28 days. Among the 24 patients enrolled in the cisplatin arm, 6 (25%) objective responses (ORs) (3 complete, 3 partial) were observed, whereas 3 partial responses were obtained in the 33 carboplatin-treated patient (9%). Analysis of results, according to response to first-line chemotherapy, demonstrated that the patients who progressed were sensitive only to cisplatin second-line treatment (OR: 3/12), with no responders among carboplatin-treated patients (OR: 0/11). All patients were treated on an outpatient basis and therapy-related toxic effects were mild, consisting chiefly of myelosuppression, and more frequent in the carboplatin group. In our opinion, carboplatin 400 mg/m2 per cycle is scarcely effective in patients with refractory or relapsed ovarian cancer pretreated with cisplatin regimens, whereas cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per cycle appears to be an effective salvage therapy even in patients not responding to carboplatin. The dose of carboplatin should be further escalated especially in refractory patients.     

Novel, dose intensive, single-agent cisplatin in the first-line management of advanced stage ovarian cancer

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the current standard chemotherapy for the management of advanced stage, epithelial ovarian cancer. However, correlation has been demonstrated previously between dose intensity and response for cisplatin, but not for the other cytotoxic drugs commonly used. We treated 46 consecutive, newly diagnosed patients following standard debulking laparotomy with cisplatin 60 mg m⁻² every 2 weeks for a total of 8 cycles. Survival and toxicity were compared with those of a similar cohort of 24 consecutive, newly diagnosed patients treated with cisplatin 75 mg m⁻² plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg m⁻² every 4 weeks for 6 cycles, at the same institution immediately prior to the current cohort. The single-agent cisplatin cohort received a mean relative cisplatin-equivalent dose intensity of 1.43 compared with a received mean relative cisplatin-equivalent dose intensity of 0.88 in the combination chemotherapy cohort, a 62.5% increase in the cisplatin dose intensity. At 2 years, 69% of the patients receiving single-agent cisplatin were alive, compared with 38% of the group receiving the combination chemotherapy ( P = 0.014). Alopecia ( P < 0.00001) and myelosuppression ( P < 0.0000001) were markedly less in the patient group receiving single-agent cisplatin. There was no significant difference in the incidence of neurotoxicity ( P = 0.28) or nephrotoxicity ( P = 0.38) between the two patient groups. In summary, relatively dose intensive, single-agent cisplatin given in a biweekly schedule for the first-line management of advanced stage, ovarian cancer produced a survival advantage compared with the previous combination cyclophosphamide/platinum combination chemotherapy. This novel therapy takes one-third less time to complete and causes fewer side effects than the current standard of combination cyclophosphamide and cisplatin.     

Phase II evaluation of 3-day topotecan with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a 3-day topotecan administration schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent measurable ovarian cancer who had up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the management of their disease participating in this phase II trial were to receive topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days in combination with cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 21 days. Dose escalation and reductions were permitted. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (median age = 65; range 37-84) were treated with this combination regimen. Seventeen were platinum-sensitive and 19 were platinum-resistant. A total of 169 cycles of chemotherapy was administered (median = 4; range 1-10). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (68.6%), neutropenic fever (7.1%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (18.3%), and requirement for blood transfusion (19.5%). Dose escalation was possible in 3 (8.3%), and dose reduction was required in 14 (38.9%) patients. Overall response rate was 25 and 44.5% stable disease. Median progression-free interval and overall survival was 5.4 and 23.5 months, respectively, independent of platinum sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The 3-day topotecan schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide appears to have good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of platinum sensitivity. Neutropenia was the only severe toxicity and was less prevalent than other reported trials of topotecan. This tolerable regimen offers patients more convenience and appears to have moderate activity.     

Phase II evaluation of 24-h continuous infusion topotecan in recurrent, potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop an alternative effective and more convenient administration schedule for intravenous topotecan when used as palliative treatment in ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of 24-h infusional topotecan (8.5 mg/m(2)) with treatment repeated every 3 weeks in 29 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy with a minimum treatment-free interval >/=6 months). RESULTS: The major toxicities of therapy were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia which developed in 86 and 14% of patients, respectively. Other severe side effects were uncommon. Only 2 partial responses (7%) were observed in the 28 patients evaluable for response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively favorable ovarian cancer patient population treated in this trial (platinum-sensitive recurrent disease), the response rate was disappointingly low. Considering the three- to fivefold higher objective response rates observed in other trials employing topotecan in individuals with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer utilizing a 5-day treatment program (delivered every 3 weeks), the results of the current study provide strong support for the conclusion that clinically relevant antineoplastic activity of this agent is highly schedule dependent.     

A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion in patients with platinum-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND: As suggested by preclinical trials, prolonged administration of topotecan, a reversible inhibitor of topoisomerase-I, may have a therapeutic advantage. Following a phase I trial of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion, we performed a phase II trial utilizing this schedule in ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Eligibility included platinum-/paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, measurable disease, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. A dose of 2.0 mg/m(2) of topotecan was administered as a 72-h infusion weekly via an ambulatory pump. Plasma topotecan concentrations were determined prior to and at the completion of each weekly course. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were entered and 23 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Two hundred eighteen weekly courses of therapy were administered (median 7 weeks, range 4-46 weeks). Toxicity was mild with grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurring in 13, 13, and 17% of patients, respectively. Two of 23 patients (9.1%) (CI 1-28%) had partial responses of 2 and 3 months' duration and 6 had stable disease. Steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations were a median of 1.2 ng/ml (range 0.4-8.00 ng/ml) following the first week of infusion. Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were highest in 2 patients with partial responses. Mean steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were 4.6, 2.0, and 1.3 ng/ml for partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. An analysis of variance of steady state plasma topotecan concentrations after the first week of infusion over all administered cycles demonstrated a significant difference in steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations between patients with partial response and stable disease and between partial response and no response (significant at the 0.05 level after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Controlling for cycle number, steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are significantly greater for patients with responding or stable disease than those with progressive disease (P = 0.0003) and have a lower bound of > or = 1.9 ng/ml (95% confidence level). CONCLUSION: Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are associated with responding or stable disease in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Steady state topotecan concentrations could potentially be utilized to modify tumor exposure and response.     

Phase II evaluation of a 3-day infusion of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile in patients treated with topotecan at 2.0 mg/m2/day x 3 days every 3 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included patients with recurrent primary peritoneal or epithelial ovarian cancer with > or =6 months elapsed from time of prior platinum treatment. Patients were required to have a performance status of < or =2 and normal hepatic and renal function. Response to therapy and toxicity was assessed using standard criteria. Chi-square and Student's t tests were used as appropriate. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All 40 patients enrolled were assessable for response. The mean age of the patients was 63.2 years (range 43-85). Median time to progression from initial treatment was 11.8 months. A total of 286 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with an average of 7.1 cycles per patient. Overall median time to progression (TTP) with 3-day topotecan treatment was 21 weeks (range 6-43 weeks). Of the 33 patients with measurable disease, 24% (11-42%, 95% CI) demonstrated a response. Seven patients had CA-125 evaluable disease with a response of 43% (10-89%, 95% CI). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 weeks (range 12-21 weeks, 95% CI). Median overall survival was 106 weeks (range 76-117 weeks, 95% CI). Assessment of toxicity by patient showed 90% demonstrating grade 3/4 neutropenia with the vast majority being uncomplicated. No severe non-hematological toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of topotecan as a 3-day regimen is feasible with demonstrable activity and tolerable toxicity. Critical comparison to the 5-day regimen in a randomized fashion is warranted.     

Effectiveness of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Twenty patients were treated with topotecan at a dose of 4 mg/m(2) weekly. Efficacy was determined according to the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Gynecologic Cancer Inter Group criteria. Median age was 62 years (45-78). Patients had received 1-7 (median 3) prior chemotherapy lines. A total of 203 weekly treatments were administered. In 13 patients (65%) treatment delay was necessary due to bone marrow toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 11 patients (55%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in four patients (20%). Six patients (30%) needed a dose reduction, and 42 cycles (21%) were given with dose reduction. No neutropenia, fever, or sepsis was observed. There was one complete response and one partial response (response rate 10%). All patients with response had platin-sensitive disease (three out of eight). Six patients needed blood transfusion. None of the patients required granulocyte/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The median duration of response was 13 months. In addition, there were four patients (20%) with a stable disease lasting at least for 4 months. Based on the results of this Phase II study, the toxicity of weekly topotecan seems to be lower than with the 3-weekly topotecan. The response rate of 10% is low but was not expected to be higher as these patients were heavily pretreated.