Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE: In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.     

Amifostine pretreatment for protection against topotecan-induced hematologic toxicity: results of a multicenter phase III trial in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVE: To determine if amifostine could reduce the hematologic toxicity associated with topotecan. METHODS: Thirty patients with recurrent/refractory gynecologic malignancies were randomized to receive topotecan (TOPO) (1.5 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5) with or without amifostine (AMI/TOPO) (500 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5) every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were randomized to each arm for a total of 49 TOPO and 53 AMI/TOPO cycles. Patient characteristics and pretreatment ANC were similar between groups. Topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5 was initially administered to seven patients. Five developed neutropenic fevers, one an uncomplicated grade 4 neutropenia, and the other an uncomplicated grade 3 neutropenia. There were two treatment-related deaths due to sepsis (one in each treatment arm). The starting dose was thereafter reduced to 1.25 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5 every 21 days. No treatment related deaths occurred after this dose reduction. The incidence of combined grade 3/4 neutropenia was reduced from 67% (33/49 cycles) to 38% (20/53 cycles) with the addition of amifostine (P = 0.003; OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan at 1.5 mg/m(2)/day days 1-5 in heavily pretreated patients resulted in excessive toxicity not manageable with amifostine. At the reduced topotecan dose (1.25 mg/m(2) x 5 days), pretreatment with amifostine reduced the hematologic toxicity associated with topotecan chemotherapy in women with recurrent/refractory gynecologic malignancies.     

Phase I/II dose finding study of combination cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with recurrent cervix cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin and gemcitabine in women with recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: A multi-institutional phase I/II dose finding study of cisplatin and gemcitabine delivered to women with recurrent previously radiated cervical carcinoma. RESULTS: Twenty eight patients were enrolled. The mean and median age of patients was 51 years (age range 35 to 70 years). Chemotherapy was given on a 28-day cycle; cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2), day 1 and gemcitabine, days 1, 8, and 15. Gemcitabine doses started at 600 mg/m(2) (dose level 1) and were escalated by 100 mg/m(2)/dose level until 1000 mg/m(2) (dose level 5). Twenty seven patients were evaluable for toxicity and disease response, and 75 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Toxicities were predominantly hematological; 18% of patients experienced grade 3 anemia, 37% grade 3 and 11% grade 4 leukopenia, 41% grade 3 neutropenia, and 26% grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity on dose level 2 (febrile neutropenia). One patient had a CR and 3 patients had a PR to therapy (15% response rate), 41% of patients had SD, and 44% had progression of cancer. Median survival was 11.9 months. CONCLUSION: Although this 28-day gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen in recurrent cervix cancer has tolerable toxicity, 21-day regimens are recommended because of improved practicality, higher dose intensity, and higher response rates.     

A pilot study of cisplatin, ifosfamide and mesna in the treatment of malignant mixed mesodermal tumors of the ovary

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and ifosfamide in the treatment of patients with malignant mixed mesodermal tumor (MMMT) of the ovary. METHODS: Ten patients with histologically confirmed primary MMMT of the ovary diagnosed between 1993 and 2001 were enrolled in the study. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 over 24 h on days 1, 2 and 3. Mesna, 400 mg/m2, was given IV immediately prior to and 4 and 8 h after the start of each ifosfamide infusion. Chemotherapy was repeated on a 28-day cycle if blood counts permitted. Standard response criteria were used. Nine patients were evaluable for response. RESULTS: Eight of the nine patients responded to therapy, with 7 complete responses (78%) and 1 partial response. Seven of the eight responders (87.5%) eventually recurred. The median progression-free survival was 10 months (range 0-94.4 months). The median overall survival was 17.1 months (range 8-125.5 months). One patient remained free of disease 94.4 months after diagnosis, and one patient remained alive with recurrence 125.5 months following diagnosis. There were 13 grade 3 toxicities and 4 grade 4 toxicities. Four patients had grade 4 and three had grade 3 neutropenia, all of which required dose reductions. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and ifosfamide/mesna demonstrated activity against MMMT of the ovary. Response durations were short, however, and the regimen was associated with significant toxicity. Novel agents with activity against MMMT of the ovary and acceptable toxicity are needed.     

Phase II study of sequential doublets: topotecan and carboplatin, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin, in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Incorporating topotecan into standard platinum/taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer has been complicated by myelosuppression. This study evaluated sequential doublets of topotecan and carboplatin, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin, in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Forty-five patients (median age, 56 years; range, 38-77 years) with stage III/IV disease and GOG performance status <2 were enrolled and received four cycles of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 to 3) and carboplatin (AUC 4 on day 1), followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) via 3-h IV infusion on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1). All cycles were 21 days. Antitumor response was assessed after four and eight cycles; patients with clinical complete response (CR) underwent second-look laparotomy for determination of pathologic CR (PCR). Dose reductions were instituted for grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and for grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Among 41 CA-125 evaluable patients, complete and partial responses were observed in 29 (70.7%) and 11 (26.8%) patients, respectively. Of the 12 clinical CRs (43%) in 28 evaluable patients, 10 patients underwent second-look laparotomy, with 3 PCRs (30%). Median time to progression was 14 months and actuarial survival was 23 months. Neutropenia was the primary toxicity and cause of dose adjustments and delays, including two deaths. CONCLUSION: The antitumor activity observed is comparable with other series, although neutropenic complications were increased. Progression-free and actuarial survivals were slightly inferior. A Phase III trial (GOG 182) of sequential doublets in the reverse sequence is ongoing.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

Phase II evaluation of 3-day topotecan with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a 3-day topotecan administration schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent measurable ovarian cancer who had up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the management of their disease participating in this phase II trial were to receive topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days in combination with cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 21 days. Dose escalation and reductions were permitted. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (median age = 65; range 37-84) were treated with this combination regimen. Seventeen were platinum-sensitive and 19 were platinum-resistant. A total of 169 cycles of chemotherapy was administered (median = 4; range 1-10). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (68.6%), neutropenic fever (7.1%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (18.3%), and requirement for blood transfusion (19.5%). Dose escalation was possible in 3 (8.3%), and dose reduction was required in 14 (38.9%) patients. Overall response rate was 25 and 44.5% stable disease. Median progression-free interval and overall survival was 5.4 and 23.5 months, respectively, independent of platinum sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The 3-day topotecan schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide appears to have good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of platinum sensitivity. Neutropenia was the only severe toxicity and was less prevalent than other reported trials of topotecan. This tolerable regimen offers patients more convenience and appears to have moderate activity.     

Phase II study of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Twenty-seven patients received liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2)) infused at day 1, followed by topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) infusion daily for 5 days. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. This combination regimen showed an overall response rate of 28%. Median time to progression was 30 weeks, with a median overall survival of 40 weeks. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was shown in 70% of patients and grade 3/4 thrombopenia in 41% of patients. Neutropenic fever was reported in 11% of patients. After reviewing the first 12 patients, the internal review board decided to administer topotecan at a dose of 0.75 mg/m(2) and liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg/m(2) for the remainder of the study. However, this adjustment did not lead to reduction in bone marrow toxicity nor to an improvement in dose intensity. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and mucositis were more reported in the second cohort but usually mild. The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan demonstrates favorable response data in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. However, substantial bone marrow toxicity limits further clinical use.     

Topotecan in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: The activity and toxicity of topotecan were evaluated in a multicenter Phase II study for patients with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histologic confirmation of the primary diagnosis was required, as well as adequate performance status and vital organ function and the presence of measurable disease. Patients were allowed one prior regimen of systemic therapy, usually platinum-based. A two-stage accrual design was utilized with early stopping criteria and monitoring of toxicity. Topotecan was administered at 1.5 mg/m(2) per day for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle with modifications based on hematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered. Two patients were ineligible (incorrect tumor type) and 2 were inevaluable (never received therapy). One additional patient was not evaluable for response (nonmeasurable disease). A median of 2 cycles was administered to each patient (range: 1-17 cycles) with grade 4 neutropenia in 68% and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 39% of patients, but without treatment-related deaths. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild and not dose-limiting. The overall (complete and partial) response rate among evaluable patients with measurable disease was 12.5% with stable disease in an additional 37. 5%. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: As a single agent topotecan shows modest antitumor activity, with manageable hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, in patients with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Further evaluation in chemotherapy-naive patients or in combination with cisplatin and/or radiation may be indicated.     

High-dose topotecan, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide (TMC) with stem cell support: a new regimen for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the optimal dose of topotecan when used in combination with high-dose melphalan and cyclophosphamide (TMC), and to assess the toxicity and efficacy of the regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer were treated. Disease status at study entry included: platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (15 patients), platinum-resistant or refractory recurrent disease (15 patients), positive second-look surgery (16 patients), failure to achieve a primary clinical complete response (CR) (7 patients). Following stem cell mobilization and collection, patients were given cyclophosphamide 1 g/m(2)/day on Days -6, -5, -4; melphalan 70 mg/m(2)/day on Days -3, -2; and topotecan at escalating doses from 1.25 to 4.0 mg/m(2)/day on Days -6 to -2. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on Day 0. RESULTS: The optimal topotecan dose selected for future trials was 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days. The regimen had acceptable toxicity with no regimen-related death. Toxicity (Bearman toxicity criteria) was limited mostly to grade 1-2 mucositis and diarrhea. The overall response rate of patients with measurable or evaluable disease was 93%. Median survival has not yet been reached, but with a median follow up of 18 months (range: 11-37) 77% of patients are alive. CONCLUSION: With a topotecan dose of 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days, the TMC regimen has acceptable toxicity and produces high response rates. In the setting of ovarian cancer, high-dose chemotherapy should be administered only as part of well-designed clinical trials. TMC should be considered a potential regimen for future randomized trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel, topotecan, cisplatin and Filgrastim in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian epithelial malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: To determine a recommended dose level (RDL) of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan in women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer as a possible experimental arm in a future Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III study. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IV disease were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, followed 2 h later by cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1. Topotecan was administered on consecutive days as a 30-minute infusion, beginning after cisplatin on day 1, receiving either 5 days beginning at 0.3 mg/m2 (cohort 1), or 3 days beginning at 0.5 mg/m2 (cohort 2). Treatment was given every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five evaluable patients were enrolled in the two cohorts. Thrombocytopenia and prolonged neutropenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Dose-limiting neutropenia was seen at the first dose level, thus all subsequent dose escalations included Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 1 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 daily x 5 with Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 2 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily x 3 with Filgrastim. CONCLUSION: In women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan is feasible. However, this treatment requires the use of Filgrastim and attenuated dosing of topotecan in both a 5-day and 3-day topotecan infusion schedule.     

Phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan in combination with a fixed dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with müllerian malignancies

BACKGROUND: Topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) interact with topoisomerase I and II (topo I and II), respectively, with schedule dependent, and potentially synergistic cytotoxicity. OBJECTIVES: Define dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan delivered by 72-h infusion administered immediately after Doxil delivered at a fixed dose (30 mg/m(2)) in a cohort of women with recurrent müllerian malignancies. METHODS: Topotecan dose was escalated from 0.5 mg/m(2)/day for 3 days in 0.2 mg/m(2)/day increments with treatment repeated every 21 days. Eligibility criteria required ECOG < or = 2 and no more than four prior lines of chemotherapy. No dose reductions were allowed in the first two cycles to allow evaluation of cutaneous toxicity. RESULTS: Between November 2000 and August 2002, 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 59 (40-71) years. Patients received a median 1 (1-6) cycles of chemotherapy, with 39 cycles of treatment delivered at DL 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response. At dose level 2, dose-limiting toxicity consisted of nausea and vomiting, mucositis, cutaneous toxicity, and neutropenia. There was no clinically significant cardiac toxicity. There were no radiologically confirmed partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: Doxil 30 mg/m(2) and topotecan 0.5 mg/m(2)/day by 72-h infusion (total dose 1.5 mg/m(2)), although a rational combination of cytotoxic therapies, have limited clinical activity.     

Ethnicity is a factor to be considered before dose planning in ovarian cancer patients to be treated with topotecan

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer. A retrospective analysis on recurrent ovarian cancer patients receiving topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) daily for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle from 1997 to 2002 was conducted. The patients included were all treated with at least two cycles of topotecan. The patient characteristics were compared in relation to their toxicity profile and their response to treatment. Response was evaluated by physical findings, imaging techniques, and serum CA125 level. A total of 60 patients were included in the study. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicities. A total of 361 cycles were given (median, 5 per patient; range 2-15). The major toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 4 in 45.0% of the patients and 10.2% of the cycles. Age was the only covariate predicting the occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia (logistic regression P= 0.046, CI 1.01-1.12). Neutropenic fever occurred in 8.3% of the patients. Eighteen (30%) patients were required to delay their chemotherapy and 11 (18.3%) required dose reduction. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. The overall response rate was 21.6%, with eight (13.3%) complete responses and five (8.3%) partial responses. The median duration of response and median time to progression were 11 and 5 months, respectively. The median survival was 14 months. Topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) in a five-times-daily schedule was well tolerated in a cohort of Chinese patients. Myelotoxicity was the most important side effect in our study, but the incidence is much lower than that reported in other studies. Age was an independent factor predicting the occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia.     

A Phase 2 Trial of Flavopiridol (Alvocidib) and Cisplatin in Platin-Resistant Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: MC0261

PURPOSE: Based upon promising preclinical and phase 1 trial results, combined flavopiridol and cisplatin therapy was evaluated in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. METHODS: A two cohort phase 2 trial of cisplatin (60mg/m(2) IV) immediately followed by flavopiridol (100mg/m(2) IV, 24h infusion; 21day cycles) was undertaken in patients with recurrent platin-sensitive or platin-resistant disease (progression>vs. ≤6months following prior platin-based therapy). Measurable disease (RECIST) - or evaluable disease plus CA125 >2X post-treatment nadir - and ECOG performance ≤2 were required. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled between December 23, 2004 and February 25, 2010: 40 platin-resistant (Group 1), and 5 platin-sensitive (Group 2). In Group 1, the median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range 2-12). Only 10% of patients incurred grade 4 toxicities, but grade 3 toxicities were common (65%): neutropenia (17.5%); nausea (12.5%); vomiting, fatigue, thrombosis, anemia (10% each). Seven patients (17.5%) achieved a confirmed response (1 CR, 6 PR; median duration 118days); ten additional patients (25%) attained maintained stable disease. Median time to progression was 4.3months; overall survival was 16.1months. Pilot translational studies assessed ascites flavopiridol level; surrogate marker studies were uninformative. In Group 2, although 4 of 5 patients responded (2 confirmed PRs with median time to progression, 10.8months and median overall survival 20.6months) the cohort was closed due to poor accrual. CONCLUSIONS: The assessed flavopiridol and cisplatin regimen displayed clinical activity in platin resistant and sensitive ovarian/primary peritoneal cancers, meriting further study.     

A multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin in chemonaïve advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this multicenter phase II study were to evaluate the effects of gemcitabine-paclitaxel-cisplatin combination chemotherapy on response rate, survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC). METHODS: Chemonaive AEOC patients with bidimensionally measurable disease or an elevated serum cancer antigen 125 level received cisplatin (70 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Between October 2000 and September 2001, 46 patients were enrolled. Sixteen patients underwent debulking surgery prior to chemotherapy. In 45 evaluable patients, overall response rate was 64.4% (7 CR and 22 PR). Median time-to-progression was 13.4 months (95% CI, 9.6-17.4 months); median progression-free survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 8.8-15.6 months); median overall survival was 26.0 months (95% CI, 18 months-not reached); and 1-year survival was 74% (95% CI, 60-88%). The relative dose intensities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin were 81.4%, 80.2%, and 89.8%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the predominant hematologic toxicity observed (73.9% of patients) followed by grade 3/4 leukopenia (56.5%), anemia (45.7%), thrombocytopenia (23.9%), and febrile neutropenia/neutropenic sepsis (26.1%). The predominant grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were alopecia (43.5%) and diarrhea (19.6%). Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities were nausea/vomiting, constipation, and uremia (2.2% each). Two treatment-related deaths occurred (neutropenic sepsis and uremia). CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine-paclitaxel-cisplatin combination chemotherapy is active with manageable toxicity in chemonaive patients with advanced ovarian cancer and should be explored in larger phase III trials.     

Feasibility study of concurrent weekly cisplatin and whole abdominopelvic irradiation followed by doxorubicin/cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

PURPOSE: A prospective Phase I study to determine toxicity of concurrent weekly intravenous cisplatin/whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy followed by four cycles of intravenous doxorubicin/cisplatin chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with advanced endometrial cancer confined to the abdominal cavity and/or paraaortic lymph nodes with small residual disease were treated postoperatively with 3000 cGy whole abdominopelvic irradiation combined with 1500 cGy boost to the pelvis or pelvic and aortic fields. Cisplatin 15 mg/m(2) was given every week during irradiation. After completing radiotherapy, patients were to receive doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for four cycles. Graduated dose reduction and acceleration of the doxorubicin dose were specified depending upon hematologic toxicity. Toxicities were monitored with weekly laboratory studies during treatment and frequent examinations. RESULTS: Five patients with Stage IIIC (paraaortic node involvement) and five with Stage IVB disease were treated on this study. Acute toxicity during chemoirradiation included one patient with grade 4 neutropenia and one patient with persistent grade 1 thrombocytopenia. Seven patients received chemotherapy after completing radiation therapy, two progressed before chemotherapy, and one had thrombocytopenia. Toxicity during chemotherapy included grade 4 neutropenia in all patients with four having five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Despite doxorubicin dose reductions for hematologic toxicity, three patients exhibited grade 4 neutropenia after both the second and third cycles. One patient developed a small bowel obstruction from radiation therapy that required surgery. There were no treatment-related deaths. Overall median survival was 14 months, with only one long-term survivor free of disease at 58 months. CONCLUSIONS: Without cytokine support, whole abdominopelvic irradiation and concurrent weekly cisplatin followed by doxorubicin/cisplatin chemotherapy without cytokine support has prohibitive hematologic toxicity.     

Phase II clinical study of irinotecan and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or recurrent disease and at least one measurable tumor site received irinotecan (60 mg/m(2) IV infusion over 90 min) on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min) on Day 1, every 28 days for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the response and toxicity analysis. The median age was 45 years (34-65). Nineteen patients had metastatic disease, 6 presented with locally recurrent disease, and 5 presented with locally recurrent plus metastatic disease. Seven patients were stage IVB at diagnosis. There were 2 complete and 18 partial responses and overall response rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval: 47-85%). Stable disease was observed in 2 patients (6.7%) and progression in 8 (26.7%). Median time to relapse was 13.4 months, with a median survival time of 16.9 months. One-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 26.7 and 65.1%, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 4 patients (13.3%) with grade 3 renal toxicity. Nine patients (30%) developed grade 3 neutropenia, and only grade 1-2 acute and late diarrhea were observed in 20 and 40%, respectively. A patient developed pancolitis after the sixth cycle. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is a clinically active regimen for metastatic and/or recurrent cervical cancer with acceptable tolerability.     

Phase II trial of topotecan and cisplatin in persistent or recurrent squamous and nonsquamous carcinomas of the cervix

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin is a standard treatment in advanced, recurrent cervical cancer. Because topotecan is an established treatment in gynecologic malignancies such as ovarian cancer and exhibits nonoverlapping toxicity with cisplatin, a phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and antitumor activity of a cisplatin/topotecan doublet in persistent or recurrent cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with bidimensionally measurable persistent or recurrent squamous cell and non squamous cell cervical cancer and adequate bone marrow were enrolled. Patients received 50 mg/m(2) of cisplatin intravenously over 1 h on Day 1 and 0.75 mg/m(2) of topotecan intravenously over 30 min on Days 1, 2, and 3 of 21-day cycles for six cycles or until disease progression. Tumor response and regimen toxicity were assessed using established Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 enrolled patients were evaluable for toxicity and tumor response. All but 2 evaluable patients had received previous radiotherapy. No patient received prior chemotherapy. The cisplatin/topotecan doublet was well tolerated, with 77 and 78% of courses given without interruption or delay and at full doses, respectively. As anticipated, the most common toxicity was hematologic, with grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 30 and 10% of cycles, respectively. The overall response rate was 28% (9/32), with 3 complete and 6 partial responses. The antitumor response in nonirradiated fields (30%) was similar to the response observed in previously irradiated fields (33%), suggesting good drug penetration. Median duration of response was 5 months (range, 2 to 15+ months). An additional 9 (28%) patients achieved stable disease. Median survival was 10 months, with 3 patients in lasting remission. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the cisplatin/topotecan combination is safe, well tolerated, and active in persistent or recurrent cervical cancer patients. A phase III, multicenter trial is under way (cisplatin/topotecan versus cisplatin) based on these favorable results to confirm the safety and efficacy profile in this patient population.