A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen compared with conventional chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy against conventional bolus chemotherapy in the preoperative treatment of patients with large operable early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-six women with histologically proven 3 cm invasive early breast cancer were randomised to receive pre-operative infusional 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) by daily 24 h continuous infusion via a Hickman line for 18 weeks with epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on day 1 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on day 1, both repeating 3-weekly (infusional ECisF), or conventional bolus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, both repeating 3-weekly (AC), both schedules for six courses. Patients subsequently had local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy or both) and tamoxifen 20 mg orally daily as appropriate. RESULTS: The 5 year results for AC and infusional ECisF, respectively, were as follows: overall response, 75% and 77%; complete clinical remission, 31% and 34%; pathological complete remission (pathCR), 16% for both; and pathCR with residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 25% and 24%. Mastectomy rates were 37% and 34%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 74% for AC and 82% for infusional ECisF (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.13; P = 0.18). Both treatments were well tolerated. Grade III/IV lethargy, vomiting, alopecia and plantar-palmar erythema were significantly greater for infusional ECisF; grade III/IV leucopenia was significantly greater for AC. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative continuous infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy is no more active than conventional AC for early breast cancer; with a median 5 year follow-up, the infusion-based schedule shows a non-significant trend towards improved survival.     

Phase II study of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil with epirubicin and carboplatin (instead of cisplatin) in patients with metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer (infusional ECarboF): a very active and well-tolerated outpatient regimen.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil (F) with cisplatin (C) and epirubicin (E), so-called infusional ECF, is a highly active new schedule against locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cisplatin, however, is a major contributor to toxicity and usually requires inpatient treatment. In an attempt to overcome this, we have investigated the effect of substituting carboplatin for cisplatin in our original infusional ECF regimen. Fifty-two patients with metastatic (n = 36) or locally advanced/inflammatory (n = 16) breast cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil 200 mg m-2 day-1 via a Hickman line using an ambulatory pump for for 6 months, with epirubicin 50 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) and carboplatin AUC5 i.v. every 4 weeks, for six courses (infusional ECarboF). The overall response rate (complete plus partial) was 81% (95% CI 67%-90%), with a complete response rate of 17% (95% CI 6-33%) in patients with metastatic disease and 56% (95% CI 30-80%) in patients with locally advanced disease. Median response duration and survival for metastatic disease was 8 and 14 months respectively, and two patients with locally advanced disease have relapsed. These results are very similar to those previously achieved with infusional ECF. Severe grade 3/4 toxicity was low. Infusional ECarboF is a highly active, well-tolerated, outpatient regimen effective against advanced/metastatic breast cancer and now warrants evaluation against conventional chemotherapy in high-risk early breast cancer.     

Symptom relief with MVP (mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The role of chemotherapy in the palliation of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have carried out a chemotherapy study emphasising symptom relief, a topic not normally discussed in previous similar studies. A total of 120 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a moderate-dose palliative chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitomycin C 8 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (alternate courses), vinblastine 6 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. Thirty-eight of 118 assessable patients (32%) achieved an objective response. Patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIIB) had a significantly better response rate (52%) than those with metastatic disease (25%) (P < 0.01). In 76 out of 110 (69%) patients, with tumour-related symptoms including 24 out of 31 patients (78%) with locally advanced disease, symptoms completely disappeared or substantially improved. In only 15 patients (14%) did symptoms progress during treatment. Symptomatic improvement was achieved after one course of chemotherapy in 61% and after two courses in 96% of responding patients. The schedule was well tolerated. Only 19% developed WHO grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, and only 3% developed significant alopecia. Other toxicities were minimal. MVP is a pragmatic inexpensive chemotherapy regimen that offers useful symptom palliation in patients with advanced NSCLC and merits a 1-2 course therapeutic trial in such patients. The schedule should also be assessed as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy before radical radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC in a randomised trial.     

A phase II study of cisplatin, vindesine and continuously infused 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Osaka Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group.

Fifty-two previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated on a 14 day cycle with cisplatin (60 mg m-2 i.v.) and vindesine (3 mg m-2 i.v.) on day 1, followed by a 3 day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (800 mg m-2 day-1) starting on day 8. An overall response rate of 40.4% was observed in 47 evaluable patients, which included one complete response and 18 partial responses. Responses were achieved in 61.1% of stage 3 patients and 27.6% of stage 4 patients. The median progression-free interval was 19.3 weeks, and median survival time was 41.6 weeks (47.1 weeks for patients with stage 3 disease and 38.7 weeks for those with stage 4 disease). Toxicity was well tolerated. Gastrointestinal and renal toxicities did not exceed WHO grade 2. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia and anaemia occurred in nine (19%) and four (9%) patients respectively, but only grade 2 thrombocytopenia was observed. Phlebitis at the infusion site was observed in 24 patients (53%). This treatment programme achieved a response rate similar to other active combination regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC, and was less toxic.     

Oral ifosfamide/mesna versus intravenous ifosfamide/mesna in non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized phase II trial of the EORTC lung cancer cooperative group

BACKGROUND:: Chronic oral administration of anticancer drugs may offer therapeuticadvantages. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: A total of 68 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,not previously treated by chemotherapy, were randomized to receiveeither ifosfamide given orally (OSI) at a dose of 1 g/day for14 days every 4 weeks, or as a 1-hour intravenous infusion (IVI)at a dose of 1.6 g/m²/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. Accordingto the route of ifosfamide administration, patients receivedeither mesna i.v. or mesna film-coated tablets for uroprotection. RESULTS:: Eight patients were found to be ineligible for the study andtherefore excluded for all analyses. Thirty-three patients receivedIVI, and 27 patients OSI. One patient randomized to OSI diedbefore treatment was initiated, leaving 59 patients fully evaluablefor toxicity. Hematological toxicity was less severe for patientson OSI, but CNS toxicity was reported more frequently on OSI(39%; 12% grade III/IV), than on 1VI (15%; 9% grade III/IV),which caused the premature close of the study. Other non-hematologicaladverse events were of modest clinical significance and comparablein both arms. Forty-nine patients were considered evaluablefor response: in the IVI arm, 5 (17%) of the 29 evaluable patientsobtained a partial remission, and 7 patients a no change (24%).In the OSI arm, 2 (10%) of the 20 evaluable patients obtaineda partial remission, and 11(52%) a stable disease. CONCLUSION:: Both arms have some activity in non-small-cell lung cancer;while OSI was less myelosuppressive than IVI, it was associatedwith a higher incidence of CNS toxicity. Oral administrationof ifosfamide, in the schedule and daily dose tested here cannotbe recommended. chemotherapy, ifosfamide, non-small-cell lung cancer, phase II trial     

Carboplatin in combination with etoposide in inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Carboplatin, a second generation platinum complex, is less nephrotoxic and emetogenic than its parent compound. We have tested the objective response to and the toxicity of the combination carboplatin 330 mg m-2 on day 1 with etoposide 120 mg m-2 on days 1, 3 and 5, administered every 3 weeks in histologically proven inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a good performance status. Thirty-one patients entered the study; 29 were evaluable for response, 24 after 3 courses and 5 after 2 courses of chemotherapy. An overall response rate of 21% was found including zero complete response and 6 partial responses. In addition, 3 minor responses (10%), 12 stable diseases (38%), and 9 progressive diseases (39%) were observed. The median survival was 48 weeks, including 68 weeks for non-metastatic (M0) patients and 27 weeks for metastatic (M+) patients. This regimen was well tolerated. Gastrointestinal toxicity never exceeded WHO grade II and renal function remained in the normal range for all cases. Haematological toxicity was low in the majority of the cases; nevertheless it proved to be the dose limiting toxicity as illustrated by two grade III anemia, one grade III leucopenia, one grade III and one grade IV thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin-etoposide combination is not more active, but clearly much less toxic than cisplatin-etoposide in NSCLC.     

Phase I study of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIB-IV.

The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-one patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC were treated in a single-centre study with escalating doses of epirubicin and vinorelbine given on an outpatient basis. The first dose level comprised epirubicin 100 mg m-2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 20 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) given intravenously every 3 weeks. Escalating doses for epirubicin and vinorelbine were respectively 120 (day 1) and 20 (days 1 and 8), 120 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) and 135 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) mg m-2. Inclusion criteria were age < or = 75 years, ECOG performance score < or = 2 and normal renal, hepatic and bone marrow functions. Dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia grade II and neutropenia grade III on day 8, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia lasting > 7 days. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at the first dose level; at the 135/25 mg m-2 dose level three out of six patients had a DLT which was considered as unacceptable. The only non-haematological toxicity reaching grade III was nausea/vomiting. One patient showed cardiac toxicity. No neurotoxicity and no treatment-related deaths were seen. The maximum tolerated dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine is 135 mg m-2 (day 1) and 25 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) respectively, causing mainly haematological toxicity. The recommended dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine for phase II studies is found to be 120 mg m-2 and 20 mg m-2 respectively.     

VP16, epirubicin and procarbazine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We report the results obtained in the treatment of 52 advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with the combination chemotherapy VP16 (120 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-2-3), epirubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v., day 1) and procarbazine (100 mg/m2 p.o., days 1 through 8). The courses were repeated every 21 days. No patient had been pretreated. A median of 5 courses was administered. Partial response was obtained in 33% and no change in 21% of patients. Median remission time was 6.5 months, and median survival of responders was 10 months. The best response rate and median survival were obtained in the lowest grade performance status patients and in locally advanced disease patients. Major chemotherapy related toxicities were grade 1-2 leukopenia and grade 2-3 alopecia.     

Combination chemotherapy and interferon alpha 2b in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP).

Thirty-four patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with a combination of polychemotherapy and recombinant interferon. Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin, 50 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 40 mg/m2 (CAP) i.v. on day 4; recombinant alpha 2b interferon (r alpha 2b IFN) was given i.m. daily at the dose of 3-5 MU from days 1 to 7. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. In the 32 eligible patients the overall response rate was 19.3% (95% C.L. 7.4-37.4%). Non-hematologic toxicity consisted formerly in flulike symptoms and fatigue complained of by 37.5% and 31.2% of patients, respectively, and vomiting reported in 68.7% of patients; grade III-IV myelotoxicity was observed in 12.5% of cases. In no case was the toxicity life threatening. The median overall actuarial survival and progression-free survival were 37 and 20 weeks, respectively. This study indicates that the combination of CAP chemotherapy and r alpha IFN is feasible and active in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.     

Non-infusional 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil combined with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECF) and to investigate the need for infusional regimens, we conducted a retrospective study in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Thirty-six patients, with histologically proven irresectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma were given: 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin on day 1, 35 mg/m 2 doxorubicin on day 1 and 500 mg/m 2 5-fluorouracil on days 1 and 8 (NIACF) every 3-weeks. A median of 3 cycles was administered. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression with grade III/IV neutropenia in 47% of cycles. Neutropenic fever occurred in 5% of the cycles; non-haematological toxicity was mild and there were no treatment-related deaths. Administered dose intensity was 96.1% for doxorubicin, 93.6% for cisplatin and 90.5% for 5-fluorouracil. There were 16 partial responses and 1 complete response (overall response rate 47%, 95% confidence interval CI 31-63%); 8 patients had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 5 months (95% CI 4-6) and 8 months (95% CI 6-10), respectively. NIACF is a well-tolerated regimen in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma that precludes the need for central venous access, with activity similar to that observed with ECF.     

Phase II study of the combination of the novel bioreductive agent, tirapazamine, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: Tirapazamine is a bioreductive compound synergistic withcisplatin in preclinical testing. This phase II study was conducted toevaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tirapazamine with cisplatin inpatients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Patients and methods: Twenty patients with unresectable stage III-B andIV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy weregiven tirapazamine (390 mg/m²) intravenously (i.v.) over twohours followed one hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m²) i.v.over one hour every 21 days.Results: Five of 20 patients (25%) had major objective responses(95% confidence interval, 11%–50%). Medianduration of response was eight months with a one year survival of40%. Toxicities included temporary hearing loss (25%), musclecramping, diarrhea, skin rash and nausea/vomiting. No grade 3 or 4hematologic or renal toxicity was observed.Conclusions: The combination of tirapazamine plus cisplatin appears to besafe and active in the treatment of advanced non-small lung cancer without asubstantial increase in toxicity compared to cisplatin alone. A phase IIIrandomized study comparing the combination to cisplatin alone has completedaccrual. Further evaluation of tirapazamine with other active agents and inmulti-modality therapy is warranted.     

Triplet chemotherapy combination with gemcitabine,cisplatin and ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: phase II study

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination GIP (gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with stage III B/IV NSCLC were treated with a combination of GIP. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 3,500 mg/m2 on day 2, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 2, repeated every 21 days. Two of the 30 patients (7%) showed a complete response and 14 patients (46%) showed a partial response. The overall response rate was 53%. The estimated median survival for all patients was 60 weeks. All patients enrolled onto the study were eligible for toxicity assessment. Toxicities were treatable and included World Health Organization grade III or IV leukopenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (18%), anemia (7%) and nausea, and vomiting (6%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 of 30 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination therapy of GIP is active, well tolerated, and easy to administer on an outpatient basis in advanced NSCLC.     

Dose-escalation study of weekly irinotecan and daily carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and toxicity profile of weekly irinotecan with daily carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-one previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients received weekly irinotecan plus carboplatin (20 mg x m(-2) daily for 5 days a week) for 4 weeks and thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The irinotecan dose was escalated from 30 mg x m(-2) in increments of 10 mg x m(-2). Four irinotecan dose levels were given and 30 patients were assessable. Their median age was 62 years (range: 52-72 years), 28 had a performance status of 0-1 and two had a performance status of 2, 12 had stage IIIA disease and 18 had IIIB disease. There were 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 10 adenocarcinomas, and one large cell carcinoma. The dose-limiting toxicities were pneumonitis, esophagitis, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 60 mg x m(-2), with two patients developing grade 4 pulmonary toxicity and one patient died of pneumonitis (grade 5). The recommended dose of irinotecan was 50 mg x m(-2). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were nausea and vomiting. Three patients achieved complete remission and 15 had partial remission, for an objective response rate of 60.0%. The median survival time was 14.9 months, and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 51.6% and 34.2%, respectively. The study concluded that the major toxicity of this regimen was pneumonitis. This therapy may be active against unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and a phase II study is warranted.     

Treatment of advanced seminoma with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and carboplatin on an outpatient basis.

This study describes the efficacy and toxicity of a combination regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine (oncovin) and carboplatin (COC) for advanced seminoma on an outpatient basis. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 43 years, range 28-63 years) were classified as stage IIC (n = 5), stage IID (n = 12), stage III (n = 9) or stage IV (n = 1). Six had been treated with prior radiotherapy; elevated beta-HCG and elevated LDH serum levels were observed in 15 and 25 patients respectively. Patients were treated with four cycles of 750 mg m-2 cyclophosphamide intravenously (i.v.), 1.4 mg m-2 vincristine i.v. (maximum 2 mg) and carboplatin adjusted to creatinine clearance. Cycles were given at 3 week intervals. The median dose of carboplatin administered was 400 mg m-2 (range 300-450 mg m-2). Six patients [22%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6-38%] achieved a complete response (CR), 19 (70%; 95% CI, 51-88%) a partial response and two (8%; 95% CI, 0 18%) showed only a response in tumour markers but not a reduction of retroperitoneal mass (NR). Post-chemotherapeutic masses were not removed surgically or irradiated. After a median follow-up of 26 months (range 5-69 months), two patients have died, one from cardiac arrest 2 years after achieving CR, the other with relapsed seminoma 5 months after therapy. None of the other patients relapsed. Main toxicity was haematological, with 22 patients (81%) experiencing thrombocytopenia WHO grade III/IV and 27 (100%) leucocytopenia WHO grade III/IV, requiring dose reduction in five patients. Seven patients experienced granulocytopenic fever. Non-haematological toxicity was rare. Peripheral neuropathy grade I was observed in four patients and grade III in one. Haemorrhagic cystitis occurred once. In conclusion, despite considerable haematological toxicity, COC is feasible on an outpatient basis, even after prior radiotherapy, and is an effective regimen for advanced seminoma with only 1/27 treatment failures after a median follow-up of 26 months.     

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent standard radiotherapy and daily low-dose cisplatin in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Both induction chemotherapy and concurrent low-dose cisplatin have been shown to improve results of thoracic irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II study was designed to investigate activity and feasibility of a novel chemoradiation regimen consisting of induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiotherapy and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin. Previously untreated patients with histologically/cytologically proven unresectable stage IIIA/B NSCLC were eligible. Induction chemotherapy consisted of vinblastine 5 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29, and cisplatin 100 mg m(-2) i.v. on days 1 and 22 followed by continuous radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) given concurrently with daily cisplatin at a dose of 5 mg m(-2) i.v. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Major toxicity during induction chemotherapy was haematological: grade III-IV leukopenia was observed in 31% and grade II anaemia in 16% of the patients. The most common severe toxicity during concurrent chemoradiation consisted of grade III leukopenia (21% of the patients); grade III oesophagitis occurred in only two patients and pulmonary toxicity in one patient who died of this complication. Eighteen of 32 patients (56%, 95% CI 38-73%) had a major response (11 partial response, seven complete response). With a median follow-up of 38.4 months, the median survival was 12.5 months and the actuarial survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 52%, 26% and 19% respectively. The median event-free survival was 8.3 months with a probability of 40%, 23% and 20% at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin and thoracic irradiation, in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, is active and feasible with minimal non-haematological toxicity. Long-term survival results are promising and appear to be similar to those of more toxic chemoradiation regimens, warranting further testing of this novel chemoradiation strategy.     

Cisplatin and vinorelbine followed by ifosfamide plus epirubicin vs the opposite sequence in advanced unresectable stage III and metastatic stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM).

A multicentric, prospective phase III study was carried out with the aim of testing the so-called ''worst drug rule'' hypothesis, which suggests the use of an effective but ''less active'' regimen that first eradicates tumoral cells resistant to a second effective and ''more active'' regimen. With respect to this hypothesis, we considered the cisplatin plus vinorelbine regimen (CCDP/VNR) as the more active regimen compared with the non-cisplatin-containing regimen of ifosfamide plus high-dose epirubicin (IFO/EPI). Thus, a randomized study was carried out to compare the sequencial strategy of three cycles of CDDP/VNR followed by three cycles of IFO/EPI with the opposite sequence in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A total of 100 consecutive previously untreated patients with stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer were centrally randomized in two arms according to stage of disease and the performance status. Patients allocated to arm A received CDDP (100 mg m-2 on day 1) plus VNR (25 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1 and 8) every 21 days for three cycles (step 1) followed, after restaging, by three cycles of IFO (2.5 g m-2 with mesna on day 1) plus high-dose EPI (100 mg m-2 on day 1) every 21 days (step 2). Patients in arm B received the opposite sequence. Type and rates of objective response were evaluated after step 1 and step 2 in agreement with WHO criteria and an intent-to-treat analysis. Patients were also analysed for toxicity patterns, time to progression and survival. After the first three cycles (step 1), overall response rate (ORR), calculated according to an intent-to-treat analysis, was 47% and 21% for arm A and arm B respectively (P = 0.0112). ORR for stage III patients was 55% and 14% for arm A and B respectively (P = 0.0097). In stage IV patients ORR was higher in arm A than in arm B (42% vs 28%) but not statistically significant (P = 0.4). Clinical responses to the shift of chemotherapy (step 2) showed that no patient pretreated with CDDP/VNR and subsequently treated with IFO/EPI showed further response, whereas in the inverse sequence arm CDDP/VNR was able to induce 26% partial response (PR) rate in patients pretreated with IFO/EPI. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.037). The overall median time to progression (TTP) of arm A and arm B did not significantly differ (6 vs 4 months; P = 0.665). However, median TTP of stage III patients was, respectively, 7 months for arm A and only 3 months for arm B. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.049). Median overall survival (OS) was 9 and 7 months respectively for arm A and arm B. Despite this trend the difference was not significant (P = 0.328). Median OS of stage III patients showed a statistically significant advantage for arm A over arm B (13 vs 7 months, P = 0.03). In addition, no statistically significant difference in OS was recorded for stage IV patients (both arms 7 months, P = 0.526). Our data do not confirm Day''s ''worst drug rule'' hypothesis, at least in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with the above-mentioned regimens. The combination of CDDP and VNR seems more active, at least in terms of response rate, than the IFO/EPI, which performed poorly.     

Laevofolinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and escalating doses of epirubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in locally advanced and/or metastatic breast carcinoma: a phase I-II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM).

Sixty-four consecutive patients with locally advanced (n = 7) or metastatic breast cancer (n = 57), were treated with a combination of laevofolinic acid 100 mg m-2 plus 5-fluorouracil 340 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1-3, cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and epirubicin 90 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1. Epirubicin dose was progressively escalated by 10 mg m-2 per cycle up to 120 mg m-2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicities. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given subcutaneously in order to prevent neutropenia. Epirubicin dosage could be increased to 100 mg m-2 in 53 patients (87%), to 110 mg m-2 in 31 patients (51%) and to 120 mg m-2 in 18 cases (30%). In most patients the dose-limiting toxicity was represented by myelosuppression. A statistically significant correlation was found between median white blood count (WBC) or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir and epirubicin dose level (P = 0.009; P = 0.008). Moreover, a statistically significant correlation was observed between the number of chemotherapeutic cycles, nadir ANC and WBC and the occurrence of anaemia and thrombocytopenia of increasing severity. These data suggest the occurrence of progressive cumulative bone marrow toxicity. Although patients who reached different epirubicin levels showed differences in mean dose intensity, such differences were not statistically significant. No correlation was found between the increase in dose intensity and type, rate or duration of objective responses. In patients with metastatic breast cancer the overall response rate was 72% (95% CL 66-78%) with a 25% complete response rate. Median duration of response was 10 and 13 months respectively for complete and partial responses. All patients with locally advanced breast cancer had an objective response and underwent radical mastectomy. Projected median survival of the whole series of patients with metastatic breast cancer was 20 + months. These data demonstrate that the combination of 5-fluorouracil with laevofolinic acid, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin is very active against metastatic breast cancer. Use of G-CSF allows epirubicin dosage to be increased up to 120 mg m-2 cycle-1, but its use may be linked to the occurrence of sometimes severe cumulative haematological toxicity.     

Continuous infusional topotecan in advanced breast and non-small-cell lung cancer: no evidence of increased efficacy.

Two open, phase II studies were performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of infusional topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and advanced breast cancer who had not received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Twenty-five patients with an ECOG performance score < 2 were treated with infusional topotecan administered as a daily, continuous intravenous infusion starting at 0.6 mg m(-2) day(-1) (NSCLC) and 0.5 mg m(-2) day(-1) (breast cancer) for 21 days every 4 weeks. Three patients achieved a partial response as defined by WHO criteria: one with NSCLC (8%; 95% CI 0-39%) and two with advanced breast cancer (15%; 95% CI 2-45%). The major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic sepsis. These data suggest that topotecan delivered as a continuous intravenous infusion over 21 days as single-agent therapy does not appear to offer a clinical advantage over conventional 5-day schedules against advanced NSCLC and advanced breast cancer.     

Bolus/infusional 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: are suboptimal dosages being used in the UK?

Bolus/infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) is reported to be highly active [partial response (PR) = 54%, median survival 18 months] in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCCa). To confirm this level of activity, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 95 previously untreated patients with MCCa treated with FA by 2 h i.v. infusion (200 mg m-2) followed by 5-FU bolus/22 h i.v. infusion (300-500 mg m-2) on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks. Thirty patients also received N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA), 250 mg m-2, 24 h prior to 5-FU/FA. In 81 evaluable patients, the response rate was low: PR = 11%, stable disease (SD) = 36% and median survival = 8 months. There was an improvement in survival with increased 5-FU dosage (500 mg m-2) [relative hazard (RH) = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.70], controlled for age, primary site, PALA, liver function and performance status. Good performance status (PS 0 or 1) was also associated with improved survival (RH = 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.46). Response, survival and toxicity were not altered by the co-administration of PALA. Bolus/infusional 5-FU (500 mg m-2) and FA was well tolerated. WHO toxicities (grade 3) were: mucositis, 2%; diarrhoea, 14%; nausea and vomiting, 5%. In light of the apparent dose effect, poor response and low toxicity, we recommend that regimes incorporating higher 5-FU dosages are explored and prospectively validated before bolus/infusional 5-FU becomes accepted standard practice.     

A phase II study of high dose epirubicin in unresectable non small cell lung cancer.

Epirubicin (EPI), a doxorubicin analogue, is reported to have equal antitumour activity with lower cardiac and systemic toxicity. Recently, the maximum tolerated dose of this drug has been revised upwards with reported increased response rates in several malignancies. We initiated a phase II study of high-dose EPI as initial treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (stage III and IV). Between May 1988 and November 1989, 25 patients were entered. The starting dose of EPI was 135 mg m-2, with dose attenuations and escalations of 15 mg m-2 based on mid-cycle evaluation of toxicity. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Nine partial responses (36%, 95% CI: 18-57.5%) and 11 patients with disease stabilisation (44%) were observed. Median (range) time to progression was 19 (3-70) weeks. Median (range) survival is 32 (9-116+) weeks. There were no treatment related deaths. Major side effects were leukocytopenia WHO grade III/IV (23% of courses) and mucositis WHO grade II/III (15% of courses). In two patients left ventricular ejection fraction decreased greater than 15% compared to baseline values after a cumulative Epirubicin dose of 435 mg m-2, and therefore went off study. In none of the patients clinical signs of congestive heart failure were observed. We conclude from our data that high-dose EPI, contrary to previous negative studies using lower doses of EPI, ranks amongst the most active regimens against advanced NSCLC. Toxicity of high-dose EPI is moderate. Further evaluation of this compound in combination regimens is recommended.