Retesting young adults with childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency with GH-releasing-hormone-plus-arginine test

Within an appropriate clinical context, severe GH deficiency (GHD) in adults has to be defined biochemically by provocative testing of GH secretion. Patients with childhood-onset GHD need retesting in late adolescence or young adulthood to verify whether they have to continue recombinant human GH treatment. GHRH + arginine (GHRH+ARG) is the most reliable alternative to the insulin-induced hypoglycemia test (ITT) as a provocative test for the diagnosis of GHD in adulthood, provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed (normal limits, 16.5 microg/L as 3rd and 9.0 microg/L as 1st centile). We studied the GH response to a single GHRH (1 microg/kg iv) + ARG (0.5 g/kg iv) test in 62 young patients who had undergone GH replacement in childhood, based on the following diagnosis: 1) organic hypopituitarism with GHD (oGHD) In = 18: 15 male (M), 3 female (F); age, 26.8+/-2.2 yr; GH peak < 10 microg/L after two classical tests]; 2) idiopathic isolated GHD (iGHD) [n = 23 (15 M, 8 F); age, 23.0+/-1.5 yr; GH peak < 10 microg/L after two classical tests]; and 3) GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHNSD) [n = 21 (10 M, 11 F); age, 25.1+/-1.6 yr; GH peak > 10 microg/L after classical test but mGHc < 3 microg/L]. The GH responses to GHRH+ARG in these groups were also compared with that recorded in a group of age-matched normal subjects (NS) [n = 48 (20 M, 28 F); age, 27.7+/-0.8 yr]. Insulin-like growth factor I levels in oGHD subjects (61.5+/-13.7 microg/L) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in iGHD subjects (117.2+/-13.1 microg/L); the latter were lower than those in GHNSD subjects (210.2+/-12.9 microg/L), which, in turn, were similar to those in NS (220.9+/-7.1 microg/L). The mean GH peak after GHRH+ARG in oGHD (2.8+/-0.8 microg/L) was lower (P < 0.001) than that in iGHD (18.6+/-4.7 microg/L), which, in turn, was clearly lower (P < 0.001) than that in GHNSD (31.3+/-1.6 microg/L). The GH response in GHNSD was lower than that in NS (65.9+/-5.5 microg/L), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. With respect to the 3rd centile limit of GH response in young adults (i.e. 16.5 microg/L), retesting confirmed GHD in all oGHD, in 65.2% of iGHD, and in none of the GHNSD subjects. With respect to the 1st centile limit of GH response (i.e. 9.0 microg/L), retesting demonstrated severe GHD in 94% oGHD and in 52.1% of iGHD. All oGHD and iGHD with GH peak after GHRH+ARG lower than 9 microg/L had also GH peak lower than 3 microg/L after ITT. In the patients in whom GHD was confirmed by retesting, the mean GH peak after GHRH+ARG was higher than that after ITT (3.4+/-0.5 vs. 1.9+/-0.4). In conclusion, given appropriate cut-off limits, GHRH+ARG is as reliable as ITT for retesting patients who had undergone GH treatment in childhood. Among these patients, severe GHD in adulthood is generally confirmed in oGHD, is frequent in iGHD, but never occurs in GHNSD.     

Comparisons among old and new provocative tests of GH secretion in 178 normal adults

Classical provocative stimuli of GH secretion such as insulin-induced hypoglycaemia, arginine, clonidine, glucagon and levodopa have been widely used in clinical practice for approximately 30 years. On the other hand, in the last 10 years new potent stimuli of GH secretion have been proposed, but an extensive comparison with the classical ones has rarely been performed, at least in adults. In order to compare the GH-releasing activity of old and new provocative stimuli of GH secretion, and to define the normative values of the GH response, in 178 normal adults (95 males, 83 females; age range: 20-50 years, all within +/-15% of their ideal body weight), we studied the GH response to: insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1IU/kg i.v.), arginine (ARG, 0.5g/kg i.v.), clonidine (CLO, 300 microg/kg p.o.), glucagon (GLU, 1mg i.m.), pyridostigmine (PD, 120mg p.o.), galanin (GAL, 80pmol/kg per min), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 1 microg/kg i.v.), GHRH+ARG, GHRH+PD, hexarelin, a GH-releasing protein (HEX, 2 microg/kg i.v.) and GHRH+HEX (0.25 microg/kg i.v.). The mean (+/-s.e.m.) peak GH response to ITT (21.8+/-2.8, range: 3.0-84.0 microg/l) was similar to those to ARG (18.0+/-1.6, range: 2.9-39.5 microg/l) or GLU (20. 5+/-2.2, range: 10.6-36.9 microg/l) which, in turn, were higher (P<0. 001) than those to CLO (8.2+/-1.6, range: 0.3-21.5 microg/l), PD (9. 6+/-1.1, range: 2.2-33.0 microg/l) and GAL (9.3+/-1.1, range: 3.9-18. 3 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH (19.1+/-1.5, range: 2.7-55.0 microg/l) was similar to those after ITT, ARG or GLU but clearly lower than those after GHRH+ARG (65.9+/-5.5, range: 13.8-171.0 microg/l) and GHRH+PD (50.2+/-4.6, range: 17.7-134.5 microg/l) which, in turn, were similar. The GH response to HEX (55.3+/-5.5, range: 13.9-163.5 microg/l) was similar to those after GHRH+ARG and GHRH+PD but lower (P<0.001) than that after GHRH+HEX (86.0+/-4.3, range: 49. 0-125.0 microg/l) which was the most potent stimulus of GH secretion. In this adult population the third centile limits of peak GH response to various stimuli were the following: ITT: 5.3; ARG: 2.9; CLO: 1.5; GLU: 7.6; PD: 2.2; GAL: 4.0; GHRH: 5.0; GHRH+ARG: 17.8; GHRH+PD: 17.9; HEX: 21.6; GHRH+HEX: 57.1. These results confirm that, among classical provocative tests of GH secretion, ITT followed by ARG and GLU are the most potent ones and possess clear limits of normality. GHRH+ARG or PD and HEX are strong stimuli of GH secretion which, however, is maximally stimulated by a combination of GHRH and a low dose of HEX. It is recommended that each test is used with appropriate cut-off limits.     

Growth hormone releasing hormone plus arginine stimulation testing in young adults treated in childhood with cranio-spinal radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) secondary to cranio-spinal radiation therapy (CSRT) is a complication seen in medulloblastoma survivors. The standard for diagnosis of adult GHD is a peak GH < 3 microg/l by the insulin tolerance test (ITT). However, insulin tolerance testing exposes patients to the risks of hypoglycaemia. Recent studies suggest that the GH releasing hormone + arginine (GHRH + ARG) test can identify GHD in cranially irradiated patients at longer time intervals after radiation. We evaluated the GHRH + ARG stimulation test compared to the ITT in young adults diagnosed with medulloblastoma during childhood. PATIENTS: We evaluated 10 young adult patients (age range 17-26 years) who were treated with CSRT during childhood for medulloblastoma, and who had resultant childhood-onset GHD. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects underwent GH provocative testing with the ITT and the GHRH + ARG test. IGF-I and IGFBP3 levels were also measured at baseline. RESULTS: Insulin tolerance testing and GHRH + arginine stimulation were performed at a mean +/- SD 14 +/- 4.4 years after cranial radiation. All patients failed the ITT with median peak GH 0.40 microg/l (range < 0.05-2.2). GHRH + arginine gave higher peak GH levels with a mean of 7.9 +/- 5.7 microg/l (P = 0.003). Four patients had peak GH > 9 microg/l and were between 7.8 and 19.6 years from cranial radiation. There was no correlation of peak GH levels with time interval since CSRT. Thirty-three per cent of subjects had normal IGF-I; neither IGF-I nor IGFBP3 standard deviation scores (SDS) correlated with ITT results. CONCLUSIONS: Using a GHRH + arginine cut-off for GHD of 9 microg/l, four patients would have been misclassified as GH sufficient, despite being > 7 years (with two patients being nearly 20 years) out from CSRT. These findings suggest that the pituitary GH-producing cells of young adults continue to maintain responsiveness to GHRH + arginine more than 5-10 years after cranial irradiation.     

The usefulness of the combined growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone and arginine stimulation test in the diagnosis of radiation-induced GH deficiency is dependent on the post-irradiation time interval

The diagnostic usefulness of the insulin tolerance test (ITT) in patients with radiation-induced GH deficiency (GHD) is well established, whereas that of the combined GHRH plus arginine stimulation test (AST) is unproven. Both tests were undertaken in 49 adult survivors (aged 16-53.7 yr), who were previously irradiated for non-pituitary brain tumors or leukemia, and 33 age-, gender-, and BMI-matched controls. The aims of the study were to examine the impact of the time interval after irradiation on the pattern of GH responsiveness to the two provocative tests and to establish the role of the GHRH + AST in the diagnosis of radiation-induced GHD. The median (range) peak GH responses to either test were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the patients [GHRH + AST, 19.9 (range, 2.7-103.5) microg/liter; ITT, 5 (0.2-34.8) microg/liter] than in normals [GHRH + AST, 55 (5.7-173.5) microg/liter; ITT, 23.8 (4.2-80) microg/liter]. In patients and normal controls, the median peak GH response to the GHRH + AST was significantly greater (P < 0.0001) than the response to the ITT. However, the ratio of the peak GH response to the GHRH + AST over that achieved with the ITT (discordancy ratio) was significantly higher (P = 0.007) in the patients (median, 3.45; range, 0.8-53.5) compared with normals (median, 2; range, 0.34-18.6), consistent with dominant hypothalamic damage and relatively preserved somatotroph responsiveness. The peak GH response to the ITT fell significantly within 5 yr of irradiation with little further change over the subsequent 10 yr. In contrast, the peak GH response to the GHRH + AST barely changed within 5 yr of irradiation but subsequently declined significantly over the next 10 yr. Thus, the evolution of change in GH responsiveness to the two different stimuli over time was markedly different, resulting in a significantly raised discordancy ratio of 6 within the first 5 postirradiation years, which then normalized over the next 10 yr. The peak GH responses to the GHRH + AST and the discordancy ratio were negatively correlated with the time interval after irradiation (r = -0.40, P = 0.0037; and r = -0.4, P = 0.0046, respectively). On a practical clinical level, the discordancy between the GH test results was important; 50% of those classified as severely GHD patients by the ITT were judged normal or only GH insufficient by the GHRH + AST. In conclusion, these findings suggest that hypothalamic dysfunction occurs early and somatotroph dysfunction occurs late, following radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. This time dependency of somatotroph dysfunction may reflect either secondary somatotroph atrophy due to hypothalamic GHRH deficiency or delayed direct radiation-induced damage to the pituitary gland. The high false negative diagnosis rate for severe GHD makes the GHRH + AST an unreliable test in clinical practice when GH status is explored in the early years after cranial irradiation with the intention to treat.     

The growth hormone (GH) response to the arginine plus GH-releasing hormone test is correlated to the severity of lipid profile abnormalities in adult patients with GH deficiency

The aim of the present study was to correlate the degree of the GH response to the combined arginine and GHRH (ARG+GHRH) test with clinical status in 157 adult hypopituitary patients and 35 healthy controls. On the basis of the GH response to ARG+GHRH, the 192 subjects were subdivided into 5 groups: group 1, very severe GH deficiency (GHD; 65 patients with GH peak <3 microg/L); group 2, severe GHD (37 patients with GH peak between 3.1-9 microg/L); group 3, partial GHD (25 patients with GH peak between 9.1-16.5 microg/L); group 4, non-GHD (30 patients with GH peak >16.5 microg/L); and group 5 (35 controls with GH peak >16.5 microg/L). Plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations were lower (P < 0.001) in patients of group 1 (74.4 +/- 6.7 microg/L) and group 2 (81.4 +/- 6.8 microg/L) than in those of group 3, 4, and 5 (163.6 +/- 40.6, 185.9 +/- 21, and 188.8 +/- 11.1 microg/L, respectively). Plasma IGF-binding protein-3 concentrations were lower (P < 0.01) in group 1 (2.1 +/- 0.2 mg/L) and group 2 (2.0 +/- 0.2 mg/L) than in group 3 (3.4 +/- 0.7 mg/L) and group 5 (3.8 +/- 0.2 mg/L). In patients of group 1, total cholesterol (228.3 +/- 5.7 mg/dL) and triglycerides levels (187.4 +/- 15.3 mg/dL) were higher than those in group 3 (196.6 +/- 9.6 and 115.8 +/- 10.1 mg/dL, respectively), group 4 (176.8 +/- 11.3 and 101.4 +/- 12.5 mg/dL, respectively), and group 5 (160 +/- 6.9 and 99.3 +/- 5.4 mg/dL, respectively). High density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in patients of group 1 (45.2 +/- 2.4 mg/dL) than in those of group 4 (54.7 +/- 3.5 mg/dL; P < 0.05) and group 5 (53.6 +/- 2 mg/dL; P < 0.001), whereas low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in patients of group 1 (127.3 +/- 7.9 mg/dL), group 2 (129.2 +/- 9.5 mg/dL), and 3 (133 +/- 9 mg/dL) than in those of group 5 (102.4 +/- 7.4 mg/dL; P < 0.05). Patients of group 2 had total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides levels at an intermediate level with respect to those in groups 1, 3, and 4. Among the five groups, no difference was found in fasting glucose concentrations, heart rate, or systolic and diastolic blood pressures. A significant increase in fat body mass and a decrease in lean body mass and total body water were found in all patients compared to controls. Disease duration was significantly shorter in patients of group 4 than in those of the remaining three groups (P < 0.001). A significant correlation was found between the GH peak after ARG+GHRH and disease duration (r = -0.401; P < 0.001), plasma IGF-I (r = 0.434; P < 0.001), total cholesterol (r = -0.324; P < 0.001), and triglycerides levels (r = -0.219; P < 0.05). A significant multiple linear regression coefficient was found between the GH peak after ARG+GHRH and plasma IGF-I levels (t = 2.947; P < 0.005), total cholesterol levels (t = -2.746; P < 0.01), and disease duration (t = -2.397; P < 0.05). In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that the degree of the GH response to ARG+GHRH is correlated with the severity of lipid profile abnormalities and substantiate the reliability of the ARG+GHRH test for the diagnosis of GHD in adults. Because at present GH treatment is recommended only in adult patients with severe GHD, patients with a GH response below 9 microg/L to the ARG+GHRH test should be treated with GH, as should patients with a peak GH response to an insulin tolerance test below 3 microg/L.     

The impact of cranial irradiation on GH responsiveness to GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6

Patients treated with cranial radiation are at risk of GH deficiency (GHD). We evaluated somatotroph responsiveness to maximal provocative tests exploring the GH releasable pool in relation to the impact of radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary unit. The GH-releasing effect of GHRH plus GH secretagogue [GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6] (GHRH+GHRP-6) was studied in 22 adult patients (age, 23.2 +/- 1.4 yr; 8 female and 14 male; mean body mass index, 22.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) who received cranial radiation for primary brain tumor distant from hypothalamic-pituitary region 7.6 +/- 0.7 yr before GH testing. Two stimulatory tests for GH secretion were employed: insulin tolerance test (ITT, 0.15 IU/kg regular insulin i.v. bolus); and GHRH+GHRP-6 test: GHRH (Geref Serono, Madrid, Spain; l microg/kg) plus GHRP-6 (CLINALFA, Laufelingen, Switzerland; 1 microg/kg) as i.v. bolus. Serum GH was measured (Delphia; Perkin Elmer, Wallac, Turku, Finland) at -30, -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Anterior pituitary function was normal in all except in 1 female with hyperprolactinemia. Twelve out of 22 irradiated patients were GH-deficient (GHD) with both tests. Eleven out of 22 (50%) irradiated patients were severely GHD, according to the ITT (GH < 3 microg/liter; mean GH peak, 1.5 +/- 0.5 microg/liter). In 9 irradiated patients, in whom ITT was performed as well, mean peak GH after the GHRH+GHRP-6 test was 6.2 +/- 0.8 microg/liter, which is considered as severe GHD, according to our own cut-off for the test (peak GH < 10 microg/liter). GH responses to both tests were highly concordant, but the differential in the GH peak concentrations between GHD and non-GHD irradiated patients was significantly larger for the GHRH+GHRP-6 test than that for the ITT. The 2 discordant responses, i.e. poor response to the ITT and good response to the GHRH+GHRP-6 test, were found in 1 hyperprolactinemic female patient and in 1 other female. One irradiated patient was diagnosed as GHD only with the combined test, because ITT was contraindicated because of epilepsy. PRL and cortisol responses to ITT were normal in all irradiated patients and did not depend on the GH status. IGF-I levels were not informative or discriminative between the GHD and non-GHD irradiated adult patients. In conclusion, the use of GH secretagogues plus GHRH is an easy, reliable and accurate way of assessing GH secretion in cranially irradiated patients. Impairment of the GH releasable pool in the irradiated patients, with a maximal provocative test, reflects alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary unit caused by radiotherapy.     

Hexarelin-induced growth hormone response in short stature. Comparison with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus pyridostigmine and arginine plus estrogen.

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide with strong GH-stimulating activity. We evaluated GH response (expressed as maximum value after stimulus [Cmax] and as area under the curve [AUC]) to HEX at the doses of 1 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 1) and 2 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 2), in comparison with the responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg po) and to arginine (ARG, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) + ethinylestradiol (EE, 1 mg/day po for 3 days before the stimulation), in 5 subjects with familial short stature (FSS), 11 with constitutional growth delay (CGD), 6 with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD), and 5 with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 1 were 26.8+/-10.5 ng/ml and 1448+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 23.6+/-14.4 ng/ml and 1146+/-750 ng/min x ml in CGD, 36.9+/-21.5 ng/ml and 2048+/-1288 ng/min x ml in NSD, 9.4+/-5.8 ng/ml and 498+/-200 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS and CGD, p<0.05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 2 were 37.7+/-16 ng/ml and 1979+/-888 ng/min x ml in FSS, 32.5+/-16.2 ng/ml and 1613+/-237 ng/min x ml in CGD, 39.7+/-20.7 ng/ml and 2366+/-1569 ng/min xml in NSD, 13.4+/-4.2 ng/ml and 645+/-293 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax in FSS, CGD and NSD p<0.01 vs GHD; AUC in NSD, p<05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after GHRH+/-PD were 46.6+/-8.8 ng/ml and 3294+/-1031 ng/min x ml in FSS, 25.9+/-11.2 ng/ml and 1464+/-735 ng/min x ml in CGD, 38.8+/-21.7 ng/ml and 2428+/-1399 ng/min x ml in NSD, 8.4+/-6.2 ng/ml and 685+/-572 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, p<0.001 vs CGD and GHD; Cmax in CGD and NSD, p<0.001 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after ARG+EE were 21.3+/-4.2 ng/ml and 1432+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 14.8+/-10 ng/ml and 805+/-489 ng/min x ml in CGD, 22.2+/-12.8 ng/ml and 1199+/-309 ng/min x ml in NSD, 4.6+/-2.5 ng/ml and 247+/-191 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, CGD and NSD, p<0.01 vs GHD). Specificity was 62% for HEX 1 and 75% for HEX 2, GHRH+PD and ARG+EE. From a diagnostic point of view, HEX 1 + HEX 2 was the association with the largest percentage of false positives (20% in FSS, 27% in CGD and 33% in NSD), HEX 1 +GHRH+PD resulted in 9% in CGD, while the combined use of HEX 1 or HEX 2 with GHRH+PD or ARG+EE and of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE did not show false positive responses. In conclusion: I) the most effective dose of HEX was 2 microg/kg i.v.; 2) HEX did not show more specificity than GHRH+PD and ARG+EE; 3) the association of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE could yield the best results at lower costs, confirming these tests as first-line tools in evaluating GH secretion.     

Impairment of GH secretion in adults with primary empty sella

Primary empty sella (PES) is generally not associated with overt endocrine abnormalities, although mild hyperprolactinemia and, in children, deficient GH secretion have been reported. The aim of this multi-center collaborative study was to evaluate basal and stimulated GH secretion in a large series of adult PES patients. The study group consisted of 51 patients [41 women and 10 men, age range: 20-78 yr; (mean+/-SD) 47+/-11 yr]; results were compared with those in normal subjects (Ns) (Ns: no.=110, 55 women, age: 20-50 yr, 37+/-14 yr), and in hypopituitaric patients (HYP) with GH deficiency (HYP: no.=44,17 women, age: 20-72, 49+/-16 yr). Baseline IGF-I levels and GH responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (insulin tolerance test, ITT) and/or GHRH+arginine (ARG) stimulation tests were evaluated. PES patients were also subdivided according to BMI in lean (BMI <28 kg/M2 no.=22) or obese (BMI >28 kg/m2 no.=29). PES patients had serum total IGF-I concentrations (mean+/-SE: 142.2+/-9.6 ng/ml) higher than HYP patients (77.4+/-6.4 ng/ml, p<0.001), but lower than Ns (213.3+/-17.2 ng/ml, p<0.005), with no differences between lean and obese PES subjects. The increase in serum GH concentrations following ITT and/or GHRH+ARG stimulation tests, although higher than that observed in HYP patients, was markedly reduced with respect to Ns. No difference was observed in the GH response to provocative tests between lean and obese PES patients. When individual GH responses to ITT or GHRH+ARG were taken into account, a large proportion of PES patients (52% after ITT, 61% after GHRH+ARG) showed a GH peak increase below the 1st centile of normal limits. Serum IGF-I levels in PES patients with blunted GH responses to provocative tests were significantly (p<0.001) lower in PES patients with normal GH responses, and a positive correlation was observed between IGF-I levels and serum GH peak concentrations after GHRH+ARG. In conclusion, the results of the present study provide evidence that adult PES patients often have an impairment of GH secretion, as indicated by the blunted GH response to ITT and GHRH+ARG provocative tests, and by the reduction in serum IGF-I levels. These changes are independent of body mass.     

Comparison between insulin tolerance test,growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH plus acipimox and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in normal subjects,obese and hypopituitary patients

OBJECTIVE: It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult humans. The biochemical diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin-tolerance test (ITT) is the best validated. The ITT has been challenged because of its low degree of reproducibility and lack of normal range, and is contra-indicated in common clinical situations. Furthermore, in severely obese subjects the response to the ITT frequently overlaps with those found in non-obese adult patients with GHD. DESIGN: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of four different stimuli of GH secretion: ITT, GHRH, GHRH plus acipimox (GHRH+Ac), and GHRH plus GHRP-6 (GHRH+GHRP-6), in two pathophysiological situations: hypopituitarism and obesity, and normal subjects. METHODS: Eight adults with hypopituitarism (four female, four male) aged 41-62 Years (48.8+/-1.4 Years), ten obese normal patients (five female, five male) aged 38-62 Years (48.1+/-2.5 Years), with a body mass index of 34.2+/-1.2 kg/m(2), and ten normal subjects (five female, five male) aged 33-62 Years (48.1+/-2.8 Years) were studied. Four tests were performed on each patient or normal subject: An ITT (0.1 U/kg, 0.15 U/kg for obese, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min) (GHRH+Ac); and GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) plus GHRP-6 (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) (GHRH+GHRP-6). Serum GH was measured by radioimmunoassay. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After the ITT the mean peak GH secretion was 1.5+/-0.3 microg/l for hypopituitary, 10.1+/-1.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 17.8+/-2.0 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH-induced GH secretion was 2+/-0.7 microg/l for hypopituitary, 3.9+/-1.2 microg/l (P=NS vs hypopituitary) for obese and 22.2+/-3.8 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. After GHRH+Ac, mean peak GH secretion was 3.3+/-1.4 microg/l for hypopituitary, 14.2+/-2.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 35.1+/-5.2 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH+GHRP-6 induced mean peak GH secretion of 4.1+/-0.9 microg/l for hypopituitary, 38.5+/-6.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 68.1+/-5.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal subjects. Individually considered, after ITT, GHRH or GHRH+Ac, the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal but higher than the minimal response in obese subjects. In contrast, after GHRH+GHRP-6 the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in this group of patients, although both acipimox and GHRP-6 partially reverse the functional hyposomamotropism of obesity after GHRH, but are unable to reverse the organic hyposomatotropism of hypopituitarism, the combined test GHRH+GHRP-6 most accurately distinguishes both situations, without the side effects of ITT.     

Relationship between the morphological evaluation of the pituitary and the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone Plus arginine in children and adults with congenital hypopituitarism

The relationship between the hypothalamus-pituitary morphology and the somatotroph responsiveness to maximal provocative tests exploring the GH releasable pool is still unclear. We evaluated the GH-releasing effect of GHRH plus arginine (GHRH plus Arg) in 36 patients with congenital GH deficiency (GHD) according to their pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings, consisting of anterior pituitary hypoplasia, stalk agenesis (neural and or vascular component), and posterior pituitary ectopia. Seventeen children (12 boys and 5 girls, aged 1--5.2 yr) were evaluated at the time of diagnosis of GHD (mean age, 3.6 +/- 1.4 yr), and 19 adults (13 males and 6 females, aged 15.9-28.6 yr) with childhood-onset GHD were reevaluated after completion of GH treatment (at least 6 months of withdrawal) at a mean age of 20.5 +/- 3.5 yr. Eleven children had isolated GHD, and 6 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) whereas 7 adults had isolated GHD, and 12 had MPHD. A residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk was visualized in 7 children and 7 adults with isolated GHD, whereas magnetic resonance imaging showed complete pituitary stalk agenesis (both vascular and neural components) in 10 children and 10 adults, including 16 with MPHD (6 children) and 4 children with isolated GHD. In the children, the median peak GH response to GHRH plus Arg (7.6 microg/L; range, 2.4--40.2 microg/L) was significantly higher than that in the adults (1.8 microg/L; range, 0.8--37.4 microg/L; P = 0.0039); it was also significantly higher in the isolated GHD patients (18 microg/L; range, 3.3--40.2 microg/L) than in those with MPHD (1.9 microg/L; range, 0.8--7.6 microg/L; P = 0.00004). In the patients with residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk the median peak GH responses to GHRH plus Arg (19.1 microg/L; range, 1.6--40.2 microg/L) was significantly higher than that in patients with complete pituitary stalk agenesis (2.2 microg/L; range, 0.8--8.8 microg/L; P = 0.00005). There was a trend toward a decrease with age in peak GH response to GHRH plus ARG: Mean serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels were 36 +/- 7.1 microg/L in the children and 63.5 +/- 22.6 microg/L in the adults (P = 0.0001). The mean IGF-I level did not differ between the children with (35.7 +/- 4.8 microg/L) and those without (36.3 +/- 8.7 microg/L) the pituitary stalk; it was much higher in the adults with residual vascular pituitary stalk (81.1 +/- 17.7 microg/L) than in those with complete pituitary stalk agenesis (47.7 +/- 12.5 microg/L; P = 0.0002). The IGF-I level was 36.1 +/- 6.7 microg/L in the isolated GHD children and 36 +/- 8.6 microg/L in those with MPHD; levels were 82.1 +/- 19.4 and 52.7 +/- 16.8 microg/L respectively, in the adults (P = 0.003). In this study we have confirmed that the partial integrity of the hypothalamic pituitary connections is essential for GHRH plus Arg to express its GH-releasing activity and have shown that this provocative test is able to stimulate GH secretion to a greater extent in those patients with GHD, but with a residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk. This test is reliable in the diagnosis of congenital hypopituitarism in both children and adults when associated with complete pituitary stalk agenesis and MPHD. In younger children with congenital GHD but less severe impairment of the pituitary stalk the GH response to GHRH plus Arg may be within the normal range; deterioration of pituitary GH reserve with a GH response of less than 10 microg/L after 20 yr of age makes this test very sensitive in the diagnosis of adult GHD.     

Deterioration of growth hormone (GH) response and anterior pituitary function in young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency and ectopic posterior pituitary: a two-year prospective follow-up study

CONTEXT: The current criteria for definition of partial GHD in young adults are still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to reinvestigate anterior pituitary function in young adults with congenital childhood-onset GHD associated with structural hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities and normal GH response at the time of first reassessment of GH secretion. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective explorative study conducted in a university research hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen subjects with a mean age of 17.2 +/- 0.7 yr and a peak GH after insulin tolerance test (ITT) higher than 5 microg/liter were recruited from a cohort of 42 patients with childhood-onset GHD and ectopic posterior pituitary at magnetic resonance imaging. GH secretion after ITT and GHRH plus arginine, IGF-I concentration, and body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, total cholesterol, and fibrinogen were evaluated at baseline and at 2-yr follow-up. RESULTS: At mean age of 19.2 +/- 0.7 yr, the mean peak GH response decreased significantly after ITT (P = 0.00001) and GHRH plus arginine (P = 0.0001). GH peak values after ITT and GHRH plus arginine were less than 5 and 9 microg/liter in 10 and eight patients, respectively. Additional pituitary defects were documented in eight patients. Significant changes were found in the values of IGF-I sd score (P = 0.0026), waist circumference (P = 0.00001), serum total cholesterol (P = 0.00001), and serum fibrinogen (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underline the importance of further reassessment of pituitary function in young adults with GHD of childhood-onset and poststimulation GH responses suggestive of partial GHD.     

Endocrine responses to ghrelin in adult patients with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogues (GHS) receptor (GHS-R), which is specific for synthetic GHS. Similar to synthetic GHS, ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion but also displays significant stimulatory effects on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. It has been hypothesized that isolated GH deficiency (GHD) could reflect hypothalamic impairment that would theoretically involve defect in ghrelin activity. PATIENTS: In the present study, we verified the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg i.v.) on GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in adult patients with isolated severe GHD [five males and one female, age (mean +/- SEM) 24.7 +/- 2.6 years, BMI 25.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m2]. In all patients, the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1 IU regular insulin i.v.) and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microg/kg i.v.) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) was also studied. The hormonal responses in GHD were compared with those in age-matched normal subjects (NS, seven males, age 28.6 +/- 2.9 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2). RESULTS: IGF-I levels in GHD were markedly lower than in NS (69.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 167.9 +/- 19.2 microg/l, P < 0.003). Ghrelin administration induced significant increase in GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in all GHD. In GHD, the GH response to ghrelin was higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH + ARG, which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than that to ITT (9.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 microg/l). These GH (1 microg/l = 2 mU/l) responses in GHD were markedly lower (P < 0.0001) than those in NS (ghrelin vs. GHRH + ARG vs. ITT 92.1 +/- 16.7 vs. 65.3 +/- 8.9 vs. 17.7 +/- 3.5 microg/l). In GHD, the highest individual peak GH response to ghrelin was markedly lower than the lowest peak GH response in NS (28.5 vs. 42.9 microg/l). GHD and NS showed overlapping PRL (1 microg/l = 32 mU/l) (10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l), ACTH (22.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 18.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/l) and cortisol responses (598.1 +/- 52.4 vs. 486.9 +/- 38.9 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ghrelin is one of the most powerful provocative stimuli of GH secretion, even in those patients with isolated severe GHD. In this condition, however, the somatotroph response is markedly reduced while the lactotroph and corticotroph responsiveness to ghrelin is fully preserved, indicating that this endocrine activity is fully independent of mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect. These results do not support the hypothesis that ghrelin deficiency is a major cause of isolated GH deficiency but suggest that ghrelin might represent a reliable provocative test to evaluate the maximal GH secretory capacity provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed.     

Influence of body mass index and gender on growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing hormone plus arginine and insulin tolerance tests

The aim of this study is to assess whether gender and body mass index (BMI) should be considered in developing thresholds to define GH deficiency, using GH responses to GHRH + arginine (ARG) stimulation and insulin tolerance test (ITT). Thirty-nine healthy subjects (19 males, 20 females; ages 21-50 yr) underwent GHRH + ARG, and another 27 subjects (19 males, 8 females; ages 20-49 yr) underwent ITT. Peak GH response was significantly higher (P = 0.005) after GHRH + ARG than with ITT, and this difference could not be explained by age, gender, or BMI. Peak GH response was negatively correlated with BMI in both tests (GHRH + ARG, r = -0.76; and ITT, r = -0.65). Peak GH response to GHRH + ARG was higher in females than males (P = 0.004; ratio = 2.4), but it was attenuated after eliminating the influence of BMI (P = 0.13; ratio = 1.6). No significant gender differences were found in peak GH responses to ITT, which could be due to the smaller number of female subjects studied. GH response to GHRH + ARG and ITT stimulation is sensitive to BMI differences and less so to gender differences. A higher BMI is associated with a depressed GH response to both stimulation tests. BMI should therefore be considered as a factor when defining the diagnostic cut-off points in the assessment of GH deficiency, whereas whether gender should be likewise used is inconclusive from this study.     

The natural history of partial growth hormone deficiency in adults: a prospective study on the cardiovascular risk and atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND: Partial GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the natural history and clinical implications of partial GHD. STUDY DESIGN: This was an analytical, observational, prospective, case-control study. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven hypopituitary patients (15 women, ages 20-60 yr) and 27 controls participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included GH peak after GHRH plus arginine [(GHRH+ARG), measured by immunoradiometric assay]; IGF-I (measured after ethanol extraction) z-sd score (SDS); glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels; and common carotid arteries intima-media thickness (IMT) measured periodically. RESULTS: At study entry, partial GHD patients had significantly lower IGF-I and HDL-cholesterol levels and homeostasis model assessment index than controls. During the 60 months of median follow-up, 11 patients had severe GHD (40.7%), seven normalized their GH response (25.9%), and nine showed persistently partial GHD (33.3%). Patients with developed severe GHD at baseline had similar age and body mass index and lower GH peak (11.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 14.3 +/- 1.5 and 12.8 +/- 1.1 microg/liter, P = 0.008) and IGF-I SDS (-0.88 +/- 0.48 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.58 and -0.42 +/- 0.78; P = 0.01) than the patients with normal GH secretion or partial GHD. Severe GHD was accompanied by decreased IGF-I SDS and increased total to HDL cholesterol ratio, triglycerides, homeostasis model assessment index, and carotid intima-media thickness; normalization of GH secretion was accompanied by increased IGF-I SDS. By receiving-operator characteristic analysis, predictors of severe GHD were a baseline GH peak after GHRH+ARG of 11.5 microg/liter (sensitivity 64%, specificity 94%) and a baseline IGF-I SDS of -0.28 (sensitivity 91%, specificity 63%). CONCLUSIONS: Of 27 patients with partial GHD after pituitary surgery, 40.7% developed severe GHD and 25.9% normalized their GH response. With the assay used, changes in the GH peak response to GHRH+ARG were accompanied by changes in the IGF-I SDS, metabolic profile, and carotid IMT. A peak GH of 11.5 microg/liter or less and IGF-I SDS -0.28 or less were highly predictive of delayed deterioration of GH secretion.     

Reduction of the pituitary GH releasable pool in short children with GH neurosecretory dysfunction

OBJECTIVES: The classical 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' (GHNSD) refers to slowly growing children with normal GH responses to classical provocative tests but impaired spontaneous GH secretion over 24 h frequently leading to low IGF-I levels. Thus it has been assumed that these subjects have insufficiency of spontaneous GH secretion due to neuroendocrine abnormalities in spite of a normal releasable pool of GH. However, classical provocative tests do not reliably assess the maximal somatotroph capacity; thus it is still unclear if the GH pool is really preserved or not. GHRH + arginine test is more potent than the classical tests and evaluates the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. The GH response to this stimulus is reproducible and also independent of age and puberty. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv) in 19 short children with GHNSD (14 boys and 5 girls, age: 12.1 +/- 0.7 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.6 and -4.9; GH peak > 10 micrograms/l after classical stimuli but mean GH concentration (mGHc) < 3 micrograms/l). The results in GHNSD were compared with those in 38 short children with idiopathic or organic severe GHD (GHD, 29 boys and 9 girls, age: 11.2 +/- 0.6 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.8 and -4.4; GH peak < 10 micrograms/l after 2 classical provocative tests) and in 83 children with normal or familial short stature (NC, 59 boys and 24 girls, age: 11.5 +/- 0.3 years., pubertal stages I-III; HV-SDS > 25th centile, normal IGF-I levels). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I levels in GHNSD (121.9 +/- 20.3 micrograms/l) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in NC (270.3 +/- 13.8 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.001) than those in GHD (72.0 +/- 4.0 micrograms/l). The mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHNSD (2.1 +/- 0.1 micrograms/l) was lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (4.9 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.01) than that in GHD (1.5 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l). On the other hand, the mean peak GH response to GHRH + ARG in GHNSD (43.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l) was markedly higher (P < 0.001) than that in GHD (8.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l) but significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (60. 4 +/- 2.7 micrograms/l). All GHD patients had peak GH responses to GHRH + ARG below the 3rd centile limit of normality (20 micrograms/l), while all GHNSD patients had peak GH responses within the normal range. No significant correlation was found between GH peak after GHRH + ARG, mGHc and IGF-I levels in each group. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that short children with 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' show reduction in the GH releasable pool evaluated by the provocative and potent GHRH + arginine test. However, the peak GH response to a single GHRH + arginine test in GH neurosecretory dysfunction is always within the normal range indicating that this test as well as classical stimuli does not distinguish normal subjects from GH neurosecretory dysfunction.     

Assessment of GH/IGF-I axis in obesity by evaluation of IGF-I levels and the GH response to GHRH+arginine test.

The GH response to provocative stimuli in obese is often as low as in panhypopituitaric patients with severe GHD; however, IGF-I levels are normal or slightly reduced. In 53 patients with simple obesity (11 M and 42 F, age: 40.3+/-1.6 yr, BMI: 39.1+/-1.0 Kg/m2), we evaluated the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg iv)+arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv), and total IGF-I levels. The mean (+/-SE) GH peak after GHRH+ARG was markedly lower (74% reduction, p<0.0001) in obese (16.8+/-2.0 microg/l) than in normal subjects (62.7+/-4.3 microg/l). IGF-I levels in obese patients (134.0+/-7.6 microg/l) were lower (33% reduction, p<0.001) than in normal subjects (200.8+/-5.7 microg/l). Taking into account the 3rd centile limit of normal response, the GH response to GHRH+ARG was reduced in 62.3% (33/53) of the obese patients, and 21.2% (7/33) of them had low IGF-I levels. Assuming the 1st centile limit, it was reduced in 33.9% (18/53) obese subjects, and 22% (4/18) of them had low IGF-I levels. Considering 3.0 microg/L as arbitrary cut-off, the GH response was reduced in 5.7% (3/53) of the obese patients, and still one of them had low IGF-I levels. Our findings: a) confirm that the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells is often deeply impaired in obesity; b) demonstrate that IGF-I assay generally rules out severe impairment of GH/IGF-I axis in obese patients with marked reduction of the GH secretion; c) indicate that the percentage of obese patients with concomitant reduction of GH secretion and IGF-I levels is not negligible. Thus, IGF-I assay should be routinely performed in obese patients; those presenting with low IGF-I levels should undergo further evaluation of their hypothalamo-pituitary function and morphology, particularly in the presence of empty sella.     

Short children with familial short stature show enhancement of somatotroph secretion but normal IGF-I levels

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH status in children with familial, idiopathic short stature (FSS). To this goal we evaluated the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg iv) + arginine (ARG) (0.5 g/kg iv) test which is one of the most potent and reproducible provocative tests of somatotroph secretion, in 67 children with FSS [50 boys and 17 girls, age 10.8+/-0.4 yr, pubertal stages I-III, height between -3.6 and -1.6 standard deviation score (SDS), target height <10 degrees centile, normality of both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion as well as of IGF-I levels]. The results in FSS were compared with those in groups of children of normal height (NHC) (42 NHC, 35 boys and 7 girls, age 12.0+/-0.5 yr, pubertal stages I-III, height between -1.3 and 1.4 SDS, height velocity standard deviation score (HVSDS)>25 degrees centile, GH peak >20 microg/l after GHRH+ARG test, mean GH concentration [mGHc]>3 microg/l) and children with organic GH deficiency (GHD) (38 GHD, 29 boys and 9 girls, age 11.2+/-3.7 yr, pubertal stages I-III, height between -5.7 and -1.3 SDS, GH peak <20 microg/l after GHRH +ARG test, mGHc <3 mg/l). Basal IGF-I levels and mGHc were also evaluated in each group over 8 nocturnal hours. IGF-I levels in FSS (209.2+/-15.6 microg/l) were similar to those in NHC (237.2+/-17.2 microg/l) and both were higher (p<0.0001) than those in GHD (72.0+/-4.0 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH +ARG test in FSS (peak: 66.4+/-5.6 microg/l) was very marked and higher (p<0.01) than that in NHC (53.3+/-4.5 microg/l) which, in turn, was higher (p<0.01) than in GHD (8.2+/-0.8 microg/l). Similarly, the mGHc in FSS was higher than in NHC (6.7+/-0.5 microg/l vs 5.1+/-0.7 microg/l, p<0.05) which, in turn, was higher than in GHD (1.5+/-0.2 microg/l, p<0.0001). In conclusion, our present study demonstrates that short children with FSS show enhancement of both basal and stimulated GH secretion but normal IGF-I levels. These findings suggest that increased somatotroph function would be devoted to maintain normal IGF-I levels thus reflecting a slight impairment of peripheral GH sensitivity in FSS.     

Different degrees of GH deficiency evidenced by GHRH+arginine test and IGF-I levels in adults with pituritary disease

To verify if the entity of the peak GH responses to the GHRH+arginine (ARG) test is able to show different degree forms of GH deficiency (GHD), we linked these responses with the number of other anterior pituitary deficits. These anterior pituitary deficits were also related with IGF-I levels. To this purpose, we studied a large cohort of lean patients with pituitary disease of different etiologies [86 males and 68 females; age: mean +/- SEM 41.5 +/- 1.2 yr, body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2]. The patients were subdivided into 4 groups according to the increasing number of hormone deficiencies: isolated GHD (HYPO1, no.=28) or GHD plus one, two or three additional hormones (gonadotrophin, ACTH, and TSH) deficiencies (HYPO2, no.=20; HYPO3, no.=15; HYPO4, no.=91). Peak GH responses to the GHRH+ARG test and IGF-I levels showed a clear difference among the groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significant difference was found between HYPO1 and HYPO4 for IGF-I levels (p < 0.05), and between HYPO1 and HYPO4 and between HYPO2 and HYPO4 for the GHRH+ARG test (p < 0.005). Considering only the patients who underwent both GHRH+ARG test and insulin tolerance test (ITT) (no.=70), the pattern of the peak GH responses to the GHRH+ARG test was the same of the whole group of patients, while no statistical difference was found with ITT. Our data show that the peak GH responses to the GHRH+ARG test and the IGF-I levels are linked to the severity of hypopituitarism, expressed by the number of increasing anterior pituitary deficits. This association is lost if the evaluation of the GH status is performed by the ITT. In all, the GHRH+ARG test and measurement of IGF-I are able to evidence different degrees of GHD in adult patients with pituitary disease.     

Retesting the childhood-onset GH-deficient patient

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults has to be shown by a single provocative test, provided that it is validated. Insulin tolerance test (ITT) has been indicated as the test of choice; now also glucagon test is validated and represents an alternative. The GHRH plus arginine (ARG) test and testing with GHRH plus a GH secretagogue are equally reliable diagnostic tools, and are now considered as 'golden' standards as ITT. Childhood-onset (CO) GHD needs retesting in late adolescence or young adulthood; this is a major clinical challenge and raises questions about the most appropriate method and cut-off value. Appropriate re-evaluation of GH status is represented by simple measurement of IGF1 concentration off rhGH treatment. Clearly, low IGF1 levels are evidence of persistent severe GHD in subjects with genetic GHD or panhypopituitarism. However, normal IGF1 levels never rule out severe GHD and CO-GHD with normal IGF1 levels must undergo a provocative test. The appropriate GH cut-off limit is specific for each provocative test. As shown by the ROC curve analysis, in late adolescents and young adults, the lowest normal GH peak response to ITT is 6.1 microg/l while that to GHRH+ARG test is 19.0 microg/l. These cut-off limits, however, are just indicative as being variable as a function of the assay used. No other test is validated for retesting. As GHRH+ARG test mostly explores the GH-releasable pool, normal GH response would be verified by a second ITT in order to rule out subtle hypothalamic defect.     

The negative GH auto-feedback in childhood: effects of rhGH and/or GHRH on the somatotroph response to GHRH or hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in children

Aim of the present study was to further clarify the negative GH auto-feedback mechanisms in childhood. To this goal we studied the effects of rhGH and/or GHRH administration on the GH response to GHRH or hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in normal short children. In 34 prepubertal children (12 girls and 22 boys, age 8.2- 14.2 yr) with normal short stature (normal height velocity and IGF-I levels) the following tests were performed: group A (no.=11): GHRH (GHRH 1 - 29, Geref, Serono; 1 microg/kg iv at 150 min) preceded by saline or GHRH at 0 min; group B (no.=6): GHRH preceded by saline or rhGH (0.005 IU/kg iv at 0 min); group C (no.=6): GHRH preceded by rhGH alone or combined with GHRH; group D (no.=6): HEX (2 microg/kg iv at 150 min) alone or preceded by rhGH. In group A, the GH response to GHRH was not modified by pre-treatment with GHRH (GH peak, mean+/-SEM: 16.7+/-2.9 vs 15.1+/-2.3 microg/l, respectively). In group B, the GH response to GHRH was clearly inhibited by rhGH (8.7+/-2.3 vs 38.8+/-4.5 microg/l, p<0.001); the GH rise after rhGH in group B overlapped with that after GHRH in group A. In group C, the GH response to GHRH after pre-treatment with rhGH (13.2+/-4.0 microg/l) was similar to that in group B and was not significantly modified by pre-treatment with rhGH+ GHRH (6.9+/-2.7 microg/l); the GH rise after rhGH+GHRH was higher (p<0.05) than that after rhGH alone. In group D, the GH response to HEX was significantly blunted by pre-treatment with rhGH (34.1+/-11.7 vs 51.2+/-17.9 microg/l, p<0.05). Our results demonstrate that in childhood the somatotroph response to GHRH is preserved after GHRH while it is inhibited after rhGH administration, which is also able to blunt the GH response to HEX. Thus, the somatostatin-mediated negative GH auto-feedback is already operative in childhood; the reason why the GHRH- induced GH rise is not inhibited by GHRH pre-treatment is unexplained.