A Scoring System for the Strength of a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND Family history of colorectal cancer is associated with an increased risk for the disease, although there are many combinations of family history that are hard to correlate with risk status. A scoring system for family history of colorectal cancer was designed to make risk more readily quantifiable.METHODS A colonoscopy database was used to test the following points system: each first-degree relative with colorectal cancer = 3 points; each second-degree relative with colorectal cancer = 1 point. Families with one or more first-degree relative affected under 50 years of age = an extra 3 points. Families with one or more second-degree relative affected under 50 years of age = an extra 1 point. Families with multiple relatives on the same side of the family = an extra 3 points (first-degree relatives), 1 point (second-degree relatives), or 2 points (first-degree and second-degree relatives). Points were added and categories defined as follows: low risk, 1 to 4 points; medium risk, 5 to 7 points; high risk, 8 to 10 points; very high risk, >10 points. A control group of average-risk patients having screening colonoscopy was used. Categories were compared in number of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and cancers.RESULTS The records of 992 patients were used to test the system. Mean adenomas per patient per group were 0.4 for controls, 1.0 for low risk, 1.0 for medium risk, 1.7 for high risk, and 1.7 for very high risk. Cancers per group were 2 of 196 for controls, 8 of 513 for low risk, 3 of 171 for medium risk, 3 of 84 for high risk, and 1 of 28 for very high risk. The score categories were combined to produce revised risk levels of low (score 1 to 7) and high (>7). Average adenomas per patient in the revised categories were 0.4 (control), 1.0 (low risk), and 1.7 (high risk). The odds ratio of having one to two adenomas was 1.73 (1.19–2.50, 95% confidence limits) in the low-risk group and 2.39 (1.41–4.01) in the high-risk group. Odds ratios for having three or more adenomas were 5.70 (2.44–13.32) in the low-risk group and 10.35 (3.97–26.97) in the high-risk group.CONCLUSION In the two-category system proposed here of quantifying familial risk of colorectal cancer, patients having less than 8 points were at low risk and those with 8 or more were at high risk. Surveillance and chemoprevention protocols can be designed through use of these risk categories. A scoring system for family history of colorectal cancer can make risk assessment easier and facilitate both collaborative studies and patient triage into appropriate screening programs.Reprints are not available.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004.     

Colorectal Surgery in Cirrhotic Patients: Assessment of Operative Morbidity and Mortality

Purpose  The morbidity from colorectal surgery can be high and increases for patients with cirrhosis of the liver. This study was designed to assess morbidity, mortality, and prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods  From 1993 to 2006, 41 cirrhotic patients underwent 43 colorectal procedures and were included. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables influencing morbidity and mortality. Results  Postoperative morbidity was 77 percent (33/43). Postoperative mortality was 26 percent (11/43) among whom six patients (54 percent) underwent emergency surgery. Four factors influenced mortality on univariate analysis: presence of peritonitis (P < 0.05), postoperative complications (P < 0.04), postoperative infections (P < 0.01), and total colectomy procedures (P < 0.02). On multivariate analysis, the only factor influencing mortality was postoperative infection (P < 0.04). The only factor influencing morbidity was the existence of preoperative ascites (P < 0.04). Conclusions  Colorectal surgery for cirrhotic patients has a high risk of morbidity and mortality. This risk is associated with the presence of infection, ascitic decompensation, and the urgent or extensive nature of the procedure. The optimization of patients through selection and preparation reduces operative risk.     

Assessment of Operative Risk in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Colorectal Cancer Model

INTRODUCTION Predictive models play a pivotal role in the provision of risk-adjusted, operative mortality rates. The purpose of the study was to describe the development of a dedicated prognostic index for quantifying operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery.METHODS Data were collected from 5,034 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery in a single center from October 1976 to July 2002. Primary end point was 30-day operative mortality. A multilevel Bayesian logistic regression model was developed to adjust for case-mix and accommodate the variability of outcomes between surgeons. The model was internally validated (split-sample) and tested using measures of discrimination, calibration, and subgroup analysis.RESULTS The patients median age was 66 (range, 18–98) years. Operative mortality was 2.3 percent with no significant variability between surgeons or through time. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: age (odds ratio = 1.5 per 10-year increase), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (odds ratio for ASA II, III, IV–V vs. I = 2.6, 4.3, 6.8), TNM staging (odds ratio for Stage IV vs. I–III = 2.6), mode of surgery (odds ratio for urgent vs. nonurgent = 2.1) no-cancer resection vs. cancer resection (odds ratio = 4.5), and hematocrit level. The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.801) and excellent agreement between observed and model-predicted outcomes over ten major colorectal procedures (P = 0.191).CONCLUSIONS The colorectal cancer model provided an accurate means of estimating risk for individual patients in the preoperative setting. It has important implications in everyday practice, because it may be used as an adjunct in the process of informed consent and for monitoring surgical performance through time.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 21 to 26, 2003.     

The Impact of Obesity on Outcome after Major Colorectal Surgery

Purpose There is an epidemic of obesity in the Western world and its associated substantial morbidity and mortality. This review examines the data on the impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality specifically in the context of colorectal surgery. Methods MEDLINE, PUBMED, and the Cochrane library were searched for relevant articles. A manual search for other pertinent papers also was performed. Results There is good evidence that obesity is a risk factor for wound infection after colorectal surgery. Obesity may increase the risk of wound dehiscence, incisional site herniation, and stoma complications. Obesity is linked to anastomotic leak, and obese patient undergoing rectal resections may be at particular risk. There is little data on the impact of obesity on pulmonary and cardiovascular complications after colorectal surgery. Operation times are longer for rectal procedures in obese patients, but hospital stay is not prolonged. Obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery are at increased risk of conversion to an open procedure. Conclusions Obesity has a negative impact on outcome after colorectal surgery. To further clarify the impact of obesity on surgical outcome, it is recommended that future studies examine grades of obesity and include measures of abdominal obesity. Reprints are not available.     

结直肠癌术后肠梗阻相关因素分析

背景：结直肠癌术后肠梗阻（POI）并不罕见,其影响患者术后营养状况,减缓预后。目前关于POI危险因素的研究甚少。目的：分析结直肠癌术后发生POI的危险因素。方法：纳入2009年1月～2013年3月于扬州市第一人民医院行结直肠癌手术的患者,采集18项POI可疑危险因素,筛选POI发生相关因素,行多元逐步logistic回归模型分析。结果：共187例患者纳入研究,31例（16．6％）发生POI,性别、吸烟史、慢性阻塞性肺病（COPD）史、白蛋白水平、直肠肿瘤、回肠造瘘与POI的发生相关（P〈0．05）。多元逐步logistic回归模型分析结果显示性别、COPD史、回肠造瘘是POI发生的独立危险因素（P〈0．05）。结论：性别、COPD史、回肠造瘘是结直肠癌POI的重要因素。     

A National Study on Lymph Node Retrieval in Resectional Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Purpose This study was designed to develop a mathematical model for predicting the number of lymph nodes harvested in bowel cancer resection specimens based on the current clinical practice in the United Kingdom. Methods Prospective clinical data were collected from 8,409 newly diagnosed bowel cancer patients presenting to 79 hospitals in Great Britain and Ireland during a variable 12-month period from 2000 to 2002. A two-level hierarchical regression model was used to identify predictors for lymph node harvest. The model was internally validated by comparing observed and model predicted lymph node harvest for patient subgroups. Results Inclusion criteria were satisfied by 5,164 patients. The average lymph node harvest was 11.7 nodes with significant between-center variability in lymph node harvest (range, 5.5–21.3 nodes). Increasing age, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, and preoperative radiotherapy were associated with a reduction of lymph node harvest (P < 0.001). Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and transverse colectomy were the lowest yield procedures for lymph node harvest. Independent predictors of lymph node harvest were age, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Dukes stage, operative urgency, type of resection, and preoperative radiotherapy. When tested, the model was found to accurately predict lymph node harvest for group statistics (comparison of observed and model predicted lymph node harvest F_1,5154 = 0.63; P = 0.427). Conclusions The results of the study suggest that the minimum number of lymph nodes harvested in colorectal cancer surgery cannot be set at a fixed value. The lymph node harvest model provides a simple tool to the frontline clinician for comparing standards between multidisciplinary bowel cancer teams. Supported by the National Clinical Audit Support Programme, (NCASP), United Kingdom.     

Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery for Cancer

PURPOSE: Since 1991, a laparoscopic-assisted resection has been used at the Royal Brisbane Hospital selectively for patients with colorectal cancer. This article audits the intermediate to long-term postoperative complications and cancer follow-up data. METHODS: All patients undergoing a laparoscopic resection for cancer were prospectively followed up with regard to long-term outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients have been studied. One hundred fifty-four patients had potentially curative procedures performed in the study period. Median follow up was 71 (range, 7–108) months. The overall recurrence rate in this group was 6 percent (21 recurrences). There was one port site recurrence after a potentially curative procedure (0.6 percent) and one port site recurrence after a palliative resection. Perioperative mortality was 1 percent (2 patients). Only six patients suffered an adhesive small-bowel obstruction postoperatively. There was one incisional hernia. Unadjusted five-year median survival data for Australian Clinico-pathological Staging A was 91 percent (3.5 percent recurrence); for Australian Clinico-pathological Staging B, 83 percent (15 percent recurrence); and for Australian Clinico-pathological Staging C, 74 percent (26 percent recurrence). CONCLUSION: In selected patients a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer produces acceptable intermediate to long-term oncologic outcomes and a low long-term complication rate.     

Multivariate Analysis of Predictive Factors for Early Postoperative Death After Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Unresectable Liver Metastases

Purpose Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. This study was designed to evaluate predictive preoperative factors of early postoperative death (<3 months) in such patients. Methods This study included 80 patients who underwent colorectal resection (n = 56) or diversion stoma (n = 24) for colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases. Twenty-two patients (28 percent) died during the first three months after surgery with two (2.5 percent) in-hospital postoperative deaths. Analysis of predictive preoperative factors for three-month postoperative death risk was performed. Results In univariate analysis, age older than 75 years (P = 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > II (P = 0.009), symptomatic patient (P = 0.01), bowel obstruction (P = 0.03), aspartate aminotransferase serum level >50 (1.5 N) IU/L (P = 0.008), and alkaline phosphatase >200 (2 N) IU/L (P = 0.02) were prognostic risk factors for three-month death after surgery. In multivariate analysis, age older than 75 years (relative risk = 7.9; P = 0.04) and aspartate aminotransferase serum level >50 IU/L (relative risk = 8.3; P = 0.03) were independent risk factors. Conclusions In patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable liver metastases, the three-month mortality rate was high (28 percent). Thus, better knowledge of risk factors could help select patients who could possibly benefit from surgery. The study suggested that age older than 75 years and liver cytolysis (>1.5 N) are associated with an increased three-month postoperative death risk. In these patients, surgery should be avoided. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 30 to May 5, 2005.     

Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Modifies Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery can modify the risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative morbidity.METHODS A total of 384 consecutive patients with colorectal disease were randomized to laparoscopic resection (n = 190) or open resection (n = 194). On admission, demographics, comorbidity, and nutritional status were recorded. Operative variables, patient outcome, and length of stay were also recorded. Postoperative complications were registered by four members of staff not involved in the study.RESULTS The overall morbidity rate was 27.1 percent, with the rate in the laparoscopic group (18.7 percent) being less than that in the open group (31.5 percent; P = 0.003). Patients who underwent laparoscopic resection had a faster recovery of bowel function (P = 0.0001) and a shorter length of stay (P = 0.0001). In the whole cohort of patients, multivariate analysis identified open surgery (P = 0.003), duration of surgery (P = 0.01), and homologous blood transfusion (P = 0.01) as risk factors for postoperative morbidity. In the open group, blood loss (P = 0.01), homologous blood transfusion (P = 0.01), duration of surgery (P = 0.009), weight loss (P = 0.06), and age (P = 0.08) were related to postoperative morbidity. In the laparoscopic group the only risk factor identified was duration of surgery (P = 0.005).CONCLUSION In the laparoscopic group, both postoperative morbidity and length of stay were significantly reduced and most risk factors for postoperative morbidity disappeared.Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, June 21 to 26, 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana.     

Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer in Octogenarians: Results in a Decade

Objectives This study was designed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians. Methods Patients aged 80 years or older who underwent elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 2006 were recruited for analysis, with the following exceptions: 1) patients who did not give informed consent; 2) unfit for operative treatment; 3) presented as surgical emergencies; 4) multiple previous abdominal operations; or 5) locally advanced tumors. Operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, mortality and morbidities, including anastomotic dehiscence, pulmonary and wound sepsis, disease recurrence, and patient survival were used to measure outcome. Results During a ten-year period, laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection was attempted in 101 octogenarians. The median age was 83 (range, 80–95) years and 45 patients were males. The median operating time was 110 (range, 60–245) minutes, with a median blood loss of 50 (range, 0–1,000) ml. Conversion was required in only one case with a leakage rate of 3.3 percent. The overall morbidity and operative mortality rate were 17 and 3 percent, respectively. With a median follow-up of 24 (range, 0–102) months, 22 patients developed recurrence, with 8 of those still surviving. The overall five-year survival is 51 percent. Conclusions Our experience confirms that laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in selected octogenarians is safe and feasible. Aside from the obvious short-term benefits, the long-term oncologic outcomes are favorable.     

Consequences of Conversion in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Introduction Laparoscopic procedures converted to open approaches have been associated with higher complication rates than laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Laparoscopic colorectal resections have relatively high conversion rates compared with other laparoscopic procedures. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of conversions compared with laparoscopic and open colorectal resections. Methods We reviewed 498 consecutive colorectal resections performed between 1995 and 2002. Procedures were divided into laparoscopic colorectal resections, open colorectal resections, or conversions. Demographics, underlying disease, type of procedure performed, and operative outcomes were compared between groups. Results Of the 238 laparoscopic procedures performed, 182 were completed laparoscopically and 56 (23 percent) required conversion; 260 were performed open. Conversions were associated with greater blood loss (200 (range, 50–750) vs. 100 (range, 30–900) ml), longer time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40–504) vs. 72 (range, 12–420) hr), and longer length of stay (6 (range, 2–67) vs.. 5 (range, 2–62) days) than the laparoscopic colorectal resections group. There was no difference in operative time, transfusion requirements, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or mortality between conversions and laparoscopic colorectal resections. Conversions resulted in fewer patients requiring transfusions (4 vs. 14 percent), shorter time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40–504) vs. 93 (range, 24–240) hr), and shorter length of stay (6 (range, 2–67) vs. 7 (range, 2–180) days) than in the open colorectal resections group. There were no differences in complications or mortality between the conversion group and the open colorectal resections group. Conclusions Laparoscopic colorectal resections has a relatively high conversion rate; however, the converted cases have outcomes similar to open colorectal resections. In fact, the converted group required fewer blood transfusions than the open group. Experience and good judgment are fundamental for timely conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to open to decrease complication rates. Despite a high conversion rate, surgeons should consider laparoscopic colorectal resections, because even when necessary, conversion does not result in poorer outcomes than laparoscopic colorectal resections or open colorectal resections. Presented at the meeting of the International Congress and Endo Expo-SLS, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 22 to 25, 2003     

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Personnel of an Academic Medical Center

The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in Israel offers the average-risk population fecal occult blood tests from the age of 50 years. Compliance, however, is very low, reaching only 6% of eligible persons in 2005. Our aim in this study was to describe the results of an improved CRC screening program directed at the in-house staff of Beilinson Hospital. All employees of Beilinson Hospital over age 50 years were sent a letter explaining the new CRC screening program and an accompanying questionnaire. Responders who reported a family history of CRC or related cancers or symptoms were offered colonoscopy; the remainder were offered sigmoidoscopy or, if they preferred, colonoscopy. Two hundred twenty of the 888 candidates (24.7%) completed the questionnaire, of whom 144 (16.2%) agreed to further investigation. These included 90 of 105 patients with a positive questionnaire and 20 of 115 with a negative questionnaire who underwent colonoscopy and 34 of 115 with a negative questionnaire who underwent sigmoidoscopy. The colonoscopy group included 26 of the 30 patients (86.6%) with a positive family history. Early-stage CRC was diagnosed in three patients (1.36%), all with a positive questionnaire. There were no pathologic findings on sigmoidoscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the questionnaire for identifying subjects with CRC or advanced adenoma were 100.00%, 18.86%, 2.27%, and 100.00%, respectively. In conclusion, using hospital facilities, we initiated a unique CRC screening program for employees. Our method may be applicable in other medical centers for the detection of adenomas and CRCs in the early, curative stages.     

Prognosis After Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery

INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leakage is a major complication of colorectal surgery causing a significant increase in 30-day mortality. The long-term prognosis of anastomotic leakage is poorly documented. This study was designed to assess whether anastomotic leakage affects five-year survival and local recurrence.METHODS A total of 5,173 patients were recruited to the Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit during the period September 1991 to August 1995 (prospective data, 5-year follow-up). The effect of anastomotic leakage on five-year survival and local recurrence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.RESULTS A total of 1,834 patients underwent a curative resection with an anastomosis (anastomotic leak = 71; 3.9 percent): 30-day mortality: 18.3 percent in the leak group, and 3.5 percent in the nonleak group (P < 0.001); local recurrence: 19 percent in the leak group, and 9.8 percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.018). A total of 1,201 patients underwent colonic anastomosis (anastomotic leak = 31; 2.6 percent). There was no significant difference in local recurrence or five-year survival between the leak and nonleak groups. A total of 633 patients underwent rectal anastomosis (anastomotic leakage = 40; 6.3 percent): 30-day mortality: 10 percent in the leak group, and 2 percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.014); cumulative five-year estimate of local recurrence: 25.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 9.6–40.5) percent in the leak group, and 10.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 7.7–13) percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.007). Cumulative five-year estimate of overall survival: 52.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 36.1–69.4) percent in the leak group, and 63.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 59.9–67.9) percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.19).CONCLUSIONS After rectal anastomosis, an anastomotic leak is associated with a significant increase in local recurrence.Reprints are not available.Supported by Ethicon Endo-Surgery, which enabled this data to be presented to the European Association of Coloproctology, Sitges, Barcelona, Spain, September 18 to 20, 2003.     

Systematic Review of the Costs of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Purpose Recent studies have confirmed the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal surgery; however, its use has not become widespread. One reason for this is perceived economic implications. A systematic review was undertaken examining the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods Electronic databases were searched for articles comparing laparoscopic colorectal surgery and open surgery. Primary outcome measures were operating room, direct hospital, and indirect costs. Secondary outcomes were conversion rates and length of hospital stay. The percentage difference in costs was used for comparisons between studies. Results Twenty-nine articles were identified in which cost data were presented (total number of patients 3,681); the economic data in most studies was limited. Operating room costs were greater for laparoscopic colorectal surgery than open surgery in all studies (median difference, 50 percent; interquartile range, 27–78 percent; P < 0.001). There was no overall difference in total hospital costs (median difference, 0 percent; interquartile range, −17.5 to 21 percent). Only two articles collected data on indirect costs, with both in favor of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in all studies (median difference, 2.8 days; interquartile range, 1.3–3.7; P < 0.001). Median conversion rate was 7.8 percent (mean, 14 percent; interquartile range, 6–21 percent). Conclusions Operating room costs are greater for laparoscopic colorectal surgery than open surgery. Total hospital costs are similar. There may be societal benefits associated with lower indirect costs for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Cost should not be a deterrent to performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Presented at the International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Berlin, Germany, September 14 to 16, 2006. Reprints are not available.     

Patterns of Surveillance Practices After Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in a French Population

PURPOSE Despite controversies, postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer is generally recommended. This registry-based study was designed to assess the adherence of surveillance practices to French guidelines and identify three-year surveillance patterns and their demographic and clinical determinants. METHODS All patients (N = 409) diagnosed with first colorectal cancer in 1998 and alive without recurrence at least six months after curative surgery were identified from a population-based registry. Medical charts from multiple sources were reviewed to collect exhaustive information on follow-up procedures used during a three-year period. Multiple correspondence and cluster analyses were used to identify surveillance patterns. RESULTS The proportion of patients with a lower surveillance than that recommended was 35 percent for clinical examination, 65 percent for abdominal ultrasound, 52 percent for chest x-ray, and 20 percent for colonoscopy. Cluster analysis identified three patterns called minimal, moderate, and intensive surveillance patterns, which included 47, 24, and 29 percent of the patients respectively. The main independent predictors of both moderate and intensive surveillance patterns vs. minimal pattern were advanced tumor stage, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Younger age also was strongly associated with the intensive surveillance pattern, and the presence of symptoms with the moderate surveillance pattern. CONCLUSIONS Adherence of surveillance practices to French guidelines seems relatively poor. Surveillance patterns are mainly explained by patient age, tumor stage, and treatment modalities. Supported by a 2001 PHRC grant (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) from the French Health Ministry. M. Boulin was supported by a grant from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. Presented at the Association des Epidémiologistes de Langue Fran?aise Conference, Bordeaux, France, September 16 to 18, 2004.     

Palliative Laparoscopic Resections for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

Purpose Issues surrounding the safety and efficacy of palliative laparoscopic resections for patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer have not been explicitly examined in the literature. This article describes our experience with laparoscopic procedures for patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer and compares their perioperative outcomes to a contemporaneous group of patients with clinically curable (Stages I–III) disease. Methods A prospective database of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer performed between 1991 and 2002 was reviewed. Data regarding patient demographics, perioperative morbidity and mortality, operative times, conversion rates, and length of stay were extracted. Statistical analysis included chi-squared and Student's t-tests as required and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 375 cases were identified, of these 49 (13 percent) underwent laparoscopic palliative resections while 326 (87 percent) patients had resections for cure. When comparing palliative to curative procedures, there were no differences in intraoperative (4 percent vs. 9 percent) or postoperative complications (14 percent vs. 12 percent), perioperative mortality (8 percent vs. 4 percent), or length of hospital stay. Patients with Stage IV disease had largertumors (5.4 ± 2.3 cm vs. 4.6 ± 2.6 cm, P = 0.04) which contributed to an increased rate of conversion (22 percent vs. 11 percent, P = 0.05) with most conversions secondary to tumor fixation or bulk (64 percent) preventing determination of resectability. Conclusions A palliative laparoscopic resection is a safe and feasible option and presents acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer. Importantly, in this difficult group ofpatients, our results compare favorably with those from previously published series of open procedures. Presented at the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Congress, Glasgow, Scotland, June 15 to 18, 2003.     

Proximal Location of Colon Cancer Is a Risk Factor for Development of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study

PURPOSE This study was undertaken to assess the incidence of 1) metachronous colorectal cancer and 2) subsequent extracolonic cancers, in relation to the location (proximal or distal to the splenic flexure) of the first primary colorectal tumor.METHODS In this population-based study, a cancer registry database was used to identify patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma between 1970 and 1999. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and those with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome were excluded from the study, as were patients with nonepithelial tumors. Location of the first tumor was established according to International Classification of Diseases-Oncology-02 classification. The registry covers a population of 500,000 residents.RESULTS A total of 5,006 patients had sporadic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum during this period of time, with 1,703 first primary tumors (34 percent) being located proximal to the splenic flexure. One hundred twenty occurrences of second primary colorectal cancer were observed in this population (2.39 percent). The risk for developing a second incidence of primary colorectal cancer was higher in patients whose initial tumor was located in the proximal colon (3.4 percent vs. 1.8 percent; odds ratio, 1.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.33–2.77; P < 0.001). The risk for each segment of the large bowel was as follows: cecum, 3.4 percent; right colon, 3 percent; transverse colon, 3.8 percent; left colon, 2.8 percent; sigmoid colon, 1.7 percent; and rectum, 1.8 percent. By contrast, the risk for developing a second, extracolonic tumor did not differ between patients with proximal and distal tumors (13.7 percent vs. 13.4 percent, P = 0.73).CONCLUSION Patients with a first tumor located within the proximal colon are at twice the risk for developing metachronous colorectal cancer. From an epidemiologic standpoint, these data are in accordance with 1) the increasing incidence and 2) the better prognosis of proximal colon cancer in various populations. Our results confirm that proximal colon cancer is a distinct entity, which justifies the reporting of cases of colon cancer according to their location proximal or distal to the splenic flexure.© The American Society of Colon and Rectal SurgeonsPublished online: 28 January 2005.Presented at the meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, Orlando, Florida, May 17 to 22, 2003..     

吸烟与结直肠癌发病关系的研究进展

结直肠癌的发病是一个多因素参与、多阶段演进的过程,不良生活方式可能是散发性结直肠癌的重要病因之一。尽管多数流行病学研究表明吸烟可增加结直肠癌的风险,但仍存在争议。本文对关于吸烟与结直肠癌发病关系的主要队列研究和病例对照研究,以及吸烟致结直肠癌的可能机制,包括免疫抑制、炎症相关结直肠癌、结肠传输时间延迟、微卫星不稳定和高甲基化、癌基因和抑癌基因以及代谢酶基因多态性作一综述。     

Abdominal Wall Recurrences After Colorectal Resection for Cancer

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate prospectively the abdominal wall recurrence rate after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, to analyze the impact of the learning curve on abdominal wall recurrence, and to assess the outcome of those patients. METHODS: The Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery database was analyzed to obtain data on cancer patients with abdominal wall recurrence, concomitant local or distant metastases, and interval between initial surgery and diagnosis of trocar site or minilaparotomy recurrences. The records of the initial procedures and the technique of specimen removal were reviewed. RESULTS: From January 1992 to July 2000, 2,583 patients (1,753 cases of carcinomas and 830 cases of benign diseases) were recorded. The malignant lesions were located on the right colon in 19 percent, the left colon in 48.8 percent, and rectum in 32.2 percent. Sixteen patients with histologic evidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma recurrences at the abdominal wall were observed (0.9 percent). Ten patients presented an advanced stage (III for 7 patients and IV for 3 patients). Eleven cases occurred during the learning curve period (the first 50 consecutive cases). The median survival time after abdominal wall recurrence diagnosis was 16 (range, 12–60) months. By July 2000 only two patients were alive. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the Italian prospective Registry of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery confirm that the incidence of abdominal wall recurrences is similar to that reported in open studies (<1 percent). Most abdominal wall recurrences occurred in the learning curve period, suggesting that surgical experience may play a role in the development of this outcome. The prognosis of these patients is very poor.