Neuropeptide Y2 receptors are involved in enhanced neurogenic vasoconstriction in spontaneously hypertensive rats

1. The present study addressed the role of neuropeptide (NPY) Y2 receptors in neurogenic contraction of mesenteric resistance arteries from female spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Arteries were suspended in microvascular myographs, electrical field stimulation (EFS) was performed, and protein evaluated by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. 2. In vasopressin-activated endothelium-intact arteries, NPY and fragments with selectivity for Y1 receptors, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, Y2 receptors, NPY(13-36), and rat pancreatic polypeptide evoked more pronounced contractions in segments from SHR than in Wistar Kyoto (WKY) arteries, even in the presence of the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226 (0.3 microM, (R)-N(2)-(diphenacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]D-arginineamide). 3. In the presence of prazosin and during vasopressin activation, EFS-evoked contractions were larger in arteries from SHR compared to WKY. EFS contractions were enhanced by the Y2 receptor selective antagonist BIIE0246TF (0.5 microM, (S)-N2-[[1-[2-[4-[(R,S)-5,11-dihydro-6(6h)-oxodibenz[b,e]azepin-11-y1]-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethyl]cyclo-pentyl-N-[2-[1,2-dihydro-3,5 (4H)-dioxo-1,2-diphenyl-3H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl]ethyl]-argininamide), reduced by BIBP3226, and abolished by the combination of BIBP3226 and BIIE0246TF. 4. Immunoblotting showed NPY Y1 and Y2 receptor expression to be similar in arteries from WKY and SHR, although a specific Y2 receptor band at 80 kDa was detected only in arteries from WKY. 5. Immunoreaction for NPY was enhanced in arteries from SHR. In contrast to arteries from WKY, BIIE0246TF increased NPY immunoreactivity in EFS-stimulated arteries from SHR. 6. The present results suggest that postjunctional neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors contribute to neurogenic contraction of mesenteric small arteries. Moreover, both enhanced NPY content and altered neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptor activation apparently contribute to the enhanced neurogenic contraction of arteries from SHR.     

Molecular characterization of the ligand-receptor interaction of neuropeptide Y.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) consists of 36 amino acids and is one of the most abundant peptides in the peripheral and central nervous system. Several subtypes of NPY receptors have been described (Y1- y6) using segments and analogues of NPY. The Y1-, Y2- and the Y5-receptor, which have been cloned, belong to the G-protein coupled hormone receptor family and will be specially addressed, because they are the endogenous binding sites of neuropeptide Y in human. In contrast, Y4-receptors recognize endogenous PP, Y3 receptors are discussed controversially and the y6-receptor is truncated in human. In this review, we summarize the data of neuropeptide Y with respect to ligand binding, selectivity, receptor structures and ligand-receptor complexes by using ligand analogues, site directed mutagenesis and photoaffinity labeling.     

Vascular pharmacology of BIIE0246, the first selective non-peptide neuropeptide Y Y(2) receptor antagonist, in vivo

BIIE0246, a recently introduced non-peptide neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(2) receptor antagonist, was pharmacologically characterized in vivo, on vascular responses evoked in the anaesthetized pig. The NPY Y(2) receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu(28)Leu(31)]NPY(24-36) evoked dose-dependent vasoconstriction in spleen. These vascular responses were potently and dose-dependently antagonized by BIIE0246. Significant inhibition was seen already at 1 nmol kg(-1), whereas at 100 nmol kg(-1) of BIIE0246 these responses were completely abolished. The ID(50) value for this antagonism was 2.1 nmol kg(-1). Peptide YY (PYY) evoked dose-dependent vasoconstriction in both kidney and spleen, vascular responses mediated by the NPY Y(1) receptor and both NPY Y(1) and Y(2) receptors, respectively. Only the splenic response was inhibited by BIIE0246, the effect of which reached significance at 1 nmol kg(-1). Already 30 min after the last dose of BIIE0246 there was a significant recovery of the PYY-evoked splenic vasoconstriction, and a further 60 min later, this response was no longer significantly inhibited compared to control. BIIE0246 (100 nmol kg(-1)) did not affect renal and splenic vasoconstrictor responses either to the NPY Y(1) receptor agonist [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY, the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine, the P2X(1)-purinoceptor agonist alpha,beta-methylene ATP or angiotensin II, demonstrating both selectivity and specificity for the NPY Y(2) receptor in vivo. It is concluded that BIIE0246 is a highly potent and selective NPY Y(2) receptor antagonist, albeit with rather short duration of action, in vivo. BIIE0246 thus represents the first interesting tool for studies on NPY Y(2) receptor-mediated transmission in vivo.     

Neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes in the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala modulate anxiogenic responses in rats

The behavioral effects induced by intra-amygdala stimulation of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(2) and the NPY Y(5) receptor subtypes were assessed in the social interaction (SI) test. Microinjections of NPY(3-36), an NPY Y(2) preferring agonist, into the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) produced bi-directional dose-response curve. At low doses NPY(3-36) has an anxiogenic effect while at higher doses it produced an anxiolytic effect. Pretreatment with the NPY Y(5) receptor antagonist Novartis 1(1 nmol), an analog of CGP71683A synthesized by Eli Lilly and Company, IN, blocked the anxiolytic effects of NPY(3-36) (80 pmol), while pretreatment with BIBO 3304 (200 pmol), a Y(1) antagonist, had no effect, suggesting that the Y(5), but not the Y(1) receptor was involved in the anxiolytic behavior produced following intra-amygdalar NPY(3-36) administration. In addition, the Y(5) antagonist had no behavioral effect when given alone at 1.0 nmol. These findings support the hypothesis that amygdalar Y(2) receptors may play a role in mediating anxiogenic effects, while Y(5) receptors may be involved in the anxiolytic behaviors of NPY.     

Neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor-mediated attenuation of neurogenic plasma extravasation acting through pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanisms.

1. The effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor agonists (administered intravenously) were examined on plasma protein ([125I]-bovine serum albumin) leakage within dura mater evoked by unilateral trigeminal ganglion stimulation (0.6 mA, 5 ms, 5 Hz, 5 min), capsaicin (1 mumol kg-1, i.v.) or substance P (1 nmol kg-1, i.v.) in anaesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. 2. NPY (EC50: 5.6 nmol kg-1) and NPY fragment 13-36 [NPY (13-36)] (ED50: 4.3 nmol kg-1), an NPY Y2 receptor agonist, dose-dependently attenuated [125I]-bovine serum albumin extravasation from meningeal vessels when administered 10 min prior to electrical stimulation. [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY, an NPY Y1 and Y3 receptor agonist, inhibited the response at a higher dose only (23 nmol kg-1) (P < 0.05). 3. NPY also significantly decreased plasma protein extravasation induced by capsaicin (1 mumol kg-1) but not by substance P (1 nmol kg-1). 4. Pertussis toxin (20 micrograms kg-1, administered intracisternally 48 h prior to stimulation) blocked completely the inhibitory effect of NPY and NPY (13-36) but did not inhibit extravasation alone. 5. We conclude that NPY inhibits neurogenically-mediated plasma protein extravasation acting through presynaptic pertussis toxin-sensitive NPY Y2 receptors, possibly by inhibition of neuropeptide release from perivascular trigeminovascular afferents.     

Characterization of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors in human cerebral arteries with selective agonists and the new Y1 antagonist BIBP 3226.

1. We have characterized pharmacologically the receptor subtype(s) responsible for the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-induced vasoconstriction in human cerebral arteries. NPY, PYY and several of their derivatives with well defined affinities at the known Y1 and Y2 receptor subtypes were used. Moreover, we tested the ability of the new Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226, to antagonize the NPY-induced cerebral vasoconstriction. 2. NPY, PYY and their agonists with high affinities at the Y1 receptor subtype ([Leu31-Pro34]-NPY and [Leu31-Pro34]-PYY) elicited strong, long lasting and concentration-dependent contractions of human cerebral arteries. Compounds with Y2 affinity such as PYY3-36 or NPY13-36 either elicited a submaximal contraction at high concentrations or failed to induce any significant vasomotor response. Also, the application of NPY or the specific Y1 agonist, [Leu31-Pro34]-NPY, to human cerebral vessels pretreated with the Y1 agonist, NPY13-36, resulted in contractile responses identical to those obtained when these compounds were tested without prior application of NPY13-36. 3. The order of agonist potency at the human cerebrovascular receptor was: [Leu31-Pro34]-NPY = [Leu31-Pro34]-PYY > or = NPY > PYY > PYY3-36 > > > NPY13-36, which corresponded to that reported previously at the neuronal and vascular Y1 receptors. 4. Increasing concentrations (10(-9)-10(-6) M) of the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226, to human cerebral vessels caused a parallel and rightward shift in the NPY dose-response curves without any significant change in the maximal contractile response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y4 receptor selective agonists based on NPY(32-36): development of an anorectic Y4 receptor selective agonist with picomolar affinity

We have previously shown [Cys-Trp-Arg-Nva-Arg-Tyr-NH(2)](2), 1, to be a moderately selective neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(4) receptor agonist. Toward improving the selectivity and potency for Y(4) receptors, we studied the effects of dimerizing H-Trp-Arg-Nva-Arg-Tyr-NH(2) using various diamino-dicarboxylic acids containing either di-, tri-, or tetramethylene spacers. These parallel dimers, 2A, 2B, 3, 4A, and 4B, and the corresponding linear tandem dimer and trimer analogues, 5 and 6, had enhanced selectivity and affinity for Y(4) receptors compared to 1 (Table 1). Substitution of Trp and Nva with Tyr and Leu, respectively, as in 2,7-d/l-diaminosuberic acid derivatized dimer, 7, resulted in a superior Y(4) selective agonist with picomolar affinity. Intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 7 potently inhibited food intake in fasted mice. Moreover, 7 (ip) inhibited the food intake in wild-type mice and not in Y(4)(-/-) knock-out mice, confirming that the actions of 7 on food intake are not due to global effects, but specifically mediated Y(4) receptors.     

Structure-function studies on neuropeptide Y and pancreatic polypeptide--evidence for two PP-fold receptors in vas deferens

The biological effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY), rat pancreatic polypeptide (rPP), hybrid analogs of NPY and PP, and C-terminal fragments of NPY were studied in the field-stimulated rat vas deferens model. The results were correlated with peptide binding experiments in Y1 and PP receptor assays on rat PC-12 cells and Y2 receptors on porcine hippocampal membranes. NPY and rPP inhibited the electrically induced contractions in the vas deferens with an IC50 of 25 and 22 nM respectively. However, in contrast to NPY, rPP could not totally block muscle activity. The inhibitory action of the long C-terminal fragment of NPY, NPY-(19-36) and NPY-(11-36), indicated that NPY acts through a Y2 receptor in the vas deferens. The structural basis for the differential recognition of NPY and PP by Y2 receptors and partly also by PP receptors, could be defined with hybrid analogs of PP and NPY. The analogs, [Ile31,Gln34]PP and [Leu31,Pro33]NPY reacted in the vas deferens preparation in accordance with their relative potency in the Y2 and PP receptor assays. [Ile31,Gln34]PP, which bound to the Y2 receptor like NPY, was also able to block the part of the contractile response which was resistant to rPP. It is concluded that in the vas deferens, PP-fold peptides act through two types of receptors: Y2 and PP, and that residues in the C-terminal part of the molecules determine the differential recognition of the peptides by these receptor types.     

Heterogeneity of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) contractile and relaxing receptors in horse penile small arteries

The distribution of neuropeptide Y (NPY)-immunorective nerves and the receptors involved in the effects of NPY upon electrical field stimulation (EFS)- and noradrenaline (NA)-elicited contractions were investigated in horse penile small arteries. NPY-immunoreactive nerves were widely distributed in the erectile tissues with a particularly high density around penile intracavernous small arteries. In small arteries isolated from the proximal part of the corpora cavernosa, NPY (30 nM) produced a variable modest enhancement of the contractions elicited by both EFS and NA. At the same concentration, the NPY Y(1) receptor agonist, [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY, markedly potentiated responses to EFS and NA, whereas the NPY Y(2) receptor agonist, NPY(13-36), enhanced exogenous NA-induced contractions. In arteries precontracted with NA, NPY, peptide YY (PYY), [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY and the NPY Y(2) receptor agonists, N-acetyl[Leu(28,31)]NPY (24-36) and NPY(13-36), elicited concentration-dependent contractile responses. Human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP) evoked a biphasic response consisting of a relaxation followed by contraction. NPY(3-36), the compound 1229U91 (Ile-Glu-Pro-Dapa-Tyr-Arg-Leu-Arg-Tyr-NH2, cyclic(2,4')diamide) and eventually NPY(13-36) relaxed penile small arteries. The selective NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist BIBP3226 ((R)-N(2)-(diphenacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]D-arginineamide) (0.3 microM) shifted to the right the concentration-response curves to both NPY and [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY and inhibited the contractions induced by the highest concentrations of hPP but not the relaxations observed at lower doses. In the presence of the selective NPY Y(2) receptor antagonist BIIE0246 ((S)-N2-[[1-[2-[4-[(R,S)-5,11-dihydro-6(6h)-oxodibenz[b,e]azepin-11-y1]-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethyl]cyclo-pentyl-N-[2-[1,2-dihydro-3,5 (4H)-dioxo-1,2-diphenyl-3H-1,2, 4-triazol-4-yl]ethyl]-argininamide) (0.3 microM), the Y(2) receptor agonists NPY(13-36) and N-acetyl[Leu(28,31)]NPY (24-36) evoked potent slow relaxations in NA-precontracted arteries, under conditions of nitric oxide (NO) synthase blockade. Mechanical removal of the endothelium markedly enhanced contractions of NPY on NA-precontracted arteries, whereas blockade of the neuronal voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels did not alter NPY responses. These results demonstrate that NPY can elicit dual contractile/relaxing responses in penile small arteries through a heterogeneous population of postjunctional NPY receptors. Potentiation of the contractions evoked by NA involve both NPY Y(1) and NPY Y(2) receptors. An NO-independent relaxation probably mediated by an atypical endothelial NPY receptor is also shown and unmasked in the presence of selective antagonists of the NPY contractile receptors.     

Functional interaction between neuropeptide Y receptors and modulation of calcium channels in the rat hippocampus

We investigated the functional interaction between neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors using nerve terminals and cultured rat hippocampal neurons, and we evaluated the involvement of voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels (VGCCs) in NPY receptors-induced inhibition of Ca(2+) influx and glutamate release. The KCl-evoked release of glutamate from hippocampal synaptosomes was inhibited by 1 microM NPY and this effect was insensitive to either BIBP3226 (Y1 receptor antagonist) or L-152,804 (Y5 receptor antagonist), but was sensitive to BIIE0246 (Y2 receptor antagonist). We could also pharmacologically dissect the NPY receptors activity by using Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptor agonists ([Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY, NPY13-36, NPY (19-23)-(Gly(1),Ser(3),Gln(4),Thr(6),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34))-pancreatic polypeptide (PP), respectively), and in all the cases we observed that these agonists could inhibited the KCl-induced release of glutamate. However, the selective and specific co-activation of both Y1 and Y2 or Y2 and Y5 receptors resulted in non-additive inhibition, and this effect was prevented in the presence of the Y2 antagonist, but was insensitive to the Y1 or Y5 receptor antagonist. Moreover, as we previously showed for Y1 receptors, we also observed that the activation of Y5 receptors inhibited the glutamate release in the dentate gyrus and CA3 subregion, without significant effect in the CA1 subregion of the hippocampus. The same qualitative results were obtained when we investigated the role of NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors in modulating the changes in [Ca(2+)](i) due to KCl depolarisation in cultured hippocampal neurons. The inhibitory effect of nitrendipine (L-type VGCC blocker) or omega-conotoxin GVIA (omega-CgTx; N-type VGCC blocker) was not potentiated by the simultaneous activation of Y1 or Y2 receptors. Moreover, the exocytotic release of glutamate was inhibited by omega-agatoxin IVA (omega-Aga; P-/Q-type VGCC blocker), and this VGCC blocker did not potentiate Y1, Y2 or Y5 receptor-mediated inhibition of glutamate release. Also, the effect of ionomycin in inducing the exocytotic release of glutamate from hippocampal synaptosomes was insensitive to the activation of NPY receptors. In the present paper, we identified a role for NPY Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptors in modulating the exocytotic release of glutamate and the [Ca(2+)](i) changes in the rat hippocampus. In conditions of co-activation, there appears to exist a physiological cross-talk between Y1 and Y2 and also between Y2 and Y5 receptors, in which Y2 receptors play a predominant role. Moreover, we also show that Y1 and Y2 receptors exert their inhibitory action by directly modulating L-, N-, and P-/Q-type VGCCs, whereas the inhibition of glutamate release mediated by the Y5 receptors seems to involve P-/Q-type VGCCs.     

Involvement of G-protein alpha il subunits in activation of G-protein gated inward rectifying K+ channels (GIRK1) by human NPY1 receptors.

This study investigated the type of G-protein alpha subunit(s) that human neuropeptide Y (NPY)1 receptors preferentially utilize when activating G-protein gated K+ currents. Two electrode voltage-clamp recordings were made from Xenopus oocytes that had been injected with cDNAs encoding either human NPY1 or D2(short) dopamine receptors, and GIRK1 a cloned rat brain K+ channel. These receptors were also co-injected with G-protein alpha i1, alpha i2, alpha i3 and alpha o1 subunits to determine which subunit(s) modulate the efficiency of signal transduction. In NPY1 receptor injected cells neuropeptide Y (100 nM) caused a 53 +/- 10 nA inward current (n = 14; EC50 = 3 nM) and this effect was blocked by pertussis toxin (500 ng ml-1 24 h). Activation of GIRK1 currents by neuropeptide Y was selectively potentiated by alpha i1 subunit cDNA whereas coupling dopamine of D2 receptors to this channel was not.     

Development and characterization of a highly selective neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor agonist radioligand: [125I][hPP1-17, Ala31, Aib32]NPY

(1) The existence of multiple classes of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors (Y(1), Y(2), Y(4), Y(5) and y(6)) is now well established. However, one of the major difficulties in the study of these various receptor subtypes is the current lack of highly selective probes to investigate a single receptor class. Up to most recently, this was particularly true for the Y(4) and Y(5) subtypes. (2) [hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY, the first highly selective Y(5) agonist, was iodinated using the chloramine T method and purified by high-pressure liquid chromatography. (3) Binding performed in rat brain homogenates revealed that equilibrium was reached after 120 min (t(1/2)=21 min) and 60 min (t(1/2)=12 min) at 25 and 100 pM [(125)I][hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY, respectively. (4) Isotherm saturation binding experiments demonstrated that [(125)I][hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY binds to an apparent single population with high-affinity (K(D) of 1.2 and 1.7 nM) and low-capacity (B(max) of 14+/-3 fmol/100,000 cells and 20+/-5 fmol/mg protein) sites in Y(5) receptor HEK293-transfected cells and rat brain membrane homogenates, respectively. No specific [(125)I][hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY binding sites could be detected in Y(1), Y(2) or Y(4) receptors transfected HEK293 cells, demonstrating the high selectivity of this ligand for the Y(5) subtype. (5) Competition binding experiments performed in rat brain membrane homogenates and Y(5)-receptor transfected HEK293 cells demonstrated that specific [(125)I][hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY binding was competed with high affinity by Y(5) agonists and antagonists such as [Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY, [hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY, hPP, CGP71683A and JCF109, but not by Y(1) (BIBP3226), Y(2) (BIIE0246) and Y(1)/Y(4) (GR231118) preferential ligands. (6) Taken together, these data demonstrate that [(125)I][hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY is the first highly selective Y(5) radioligand to be developed. This new probe should prove most useful for further detailed studies of the molecular and pharmacological properties of this receptor subtype in brain and peripheral tissues.     

Neuropeptide Y modulates effects of bradykinin and prostaglandin E2 on trigeminal nociceptors via activation of the Y1 and Y2 receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although previous studies have demonstrated that neuropeptide Y (NPY) modulates nociceptors, the relative contributions of the Y1 and Y2 receptors are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of Y1 and Y2 receptor activation on nociceptors stimulated by bradykinin (BK) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Combined immunohistochemistry (IHC) with in situ hybridization (ISH) demonstrated that Y1- and Y2-receptors are collocated with bradykinin (2) (B2)-receptors in rat trigeminal ganglia (TG). The relative functions of the Y1 and Y2 receptors in modulating BK/PGE2-evoked CGRP release and increased intracellular calcium levels in cultured TG neurons were evaluated. KEY RESULTS: The Y1 and Y2 receptors are co-expressed with B2 in TG neurons, suggesting the potential for direct NPY modulation of BK responses. Pretreatment with the Y1 agonist [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY, inhibited BK/PGE2-evoked CGRP release. Conversely, pretreatment with PYY(3-36), a Y2 agonist, increased BK/PGE2 evoked CGRP release. Treatment with NPY evoked an overall inhibitory effect, although of lesser magnitude. Similarly, [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY inhibited BK/PGE2-evoked increases in intracellular calcium levels whereas PYY(3-36) increased responses. NPY inhibition of BK/PGE2-evoked release of CGRP was reversed by the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBO3304, and higher concentrations of BIBO3304 significantly facilitated CGRP release. The Y2 receptor antagonist, BIIE0246, enhanced the inhibitory NPY effects. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that NPY modulation of peptidergic neurons is due to net activation of inhibitory Y1 and excitatory Y2 receptor systems. The relative expression or activity of these opposing receptor systems may mediate dynamic responses to injury and pain.     

Neuropeptide Y2 receptors as drug targets for the central regulation of body weight

During the past decade, a detailed understanding has emerged of the aminergic and peptidergic neural pathways present within the brain that regulate appetite. Central among the peptide regulators is neuropeptide Y (NPY), a potent orexigenic agent that acts through five different receptor subtypes. Efforts to find novel appetite suppressant drugs that inhibit the interaction of NPY with either the NPY Y1 or NPY Y5 receptor subtypes have proven disappointing. Attempts have now been made to identify an NPY Y2 stimulator that will suppress appetite. Within the hypothalamus, NPY Y2 receptors have a predominantly presynaptic location where they act to inhibit NPY release. Stimulation of NPY Y2 receptors with synthetic peptide ligands or the gut derived peptide PY3-36 has been shown to reduce food intake. The NPY Y2 receptor has a wide distribution both within the brain and in the periphery. Stimulation of the NPY Y2 subtype at these sites produces a wide array of effects unrelated to changes in food intake. In consequence, the administration of both endogenous and exogenous agonists of the NPY Y2 receptor is likely to cause side effects, particularly regarding pituitary hormone release, as well as on the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal systems. The possibility that long-term NPY Y2 agonism could cause bone thinning and retinal angiogenesis are of particular concern and will need to be investigated as drug discovery moves forward.     

Different neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes in rat and rabbit vas deferens.

Prejunctional neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors that inhibit the contractions evoked in rat and rabbit vas deferens by field stimulation were investigated by using NPY, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and the fragments, NPY-(13-36) and NPY-(18-36). NPY, and especially [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, were more potent agonists on the twitch response of the rabbit vas deferens. In contrast the NPY C-terminal fragments, NPY-(13-36) and NPY-(18-36), inhibited the twitch response at lower concentrations in the rat vas deferens. These results indicate that distinct NPY receptor subtypes mediate the biological effect in these two tissues. We suggest that prejunctional receptors in the rat vas deferens are of the Y2-subtype and those in rabbit vas deferens of the Y1-subtype.     

The ability of neuropeptide Y to mediate responses in the murine cutaneous microvasculature: an analysis of the contribution of Y1 and Y2 receptors

1. The ability of neuropeptide Y (NPY) to modulate skin blood flow, oedema formation and neutrophil accumulation was investigated. Experiments were designed to examine the possible contribution of the Y2 receptor, in addition to the Y1 receptor, through use of Y2 receptor knockout mice (Y2-/-) and selective receptor antagonists. 2. The development of a 99mTc clearance technique for the measurement of microvascular blood flow changes in mouse dorsal skin revealed a dose-dependent ability of picomole amounts of NPY, and also of the Y1-preferred agonist Pro34NPY and the Y2-preferred agonist PYY(3-36) to decrease blood flow. 3. The Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO3304 blocked responses to the Y1 agonist at the lower doses, but only partially inhibited at the higher doses tested in Y2+/+. In Y2-/- receptor mice, the responses to the Y2 agonist were abolished at the lower doses and partially reduced at the highest dose tested, while those to the Y1 agonist were similar in both Y2+/+ and Y2-/-receptor mice. 4. In Y2+/+ receptor mice, the simultaneous injection of the Y2 antagonist BIIE0246 with BIBO3304 abolished Y2 agonist-induced decreases in blood flow over the dose range used (10-100 pmol). When the Y2 receptor antagonist BIIE0246 was given alone, it was not able to significantly affect the PYY(3-36)-induced response, whereas the Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO3304 partially (P<0.001) inhibited the decrease in blood flow evoked by PYY(3-36) at the highest dose. 5. NPY did not mediate either oedema formation, even when investigated in the presence of the vasodilator calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or neutrophil accumulation in murine skin. 6. We conclude that the major vasoactive activity of NPY in the cutaneous microvasculature is to act in a potent manner to decrease blood flow via Y1 receptors, with evidence for the additional involvement of postjunctional Y2 receptors. Our results do not provide evidence for a potent proinflammatory activity of NPY in the cutaneous microvasculature.     

Characterization of vascular neuropeptide Y receptors.

1. In the present study we compared neuropeptide Y (NPY) and NPY-related analogues for their ability to activate or bind to vascular NPY receptors in four experimental set-ups. Previous results have suggested the existence of different receptor subtypes, Y1 receptors requiring full-length NPY (1-36) or [Pro34]-NPY, and Y2 receptors recognizing also N-terminally truncated forms of NPY but not [Pro34]-NPY. 2. NPY 1-36 and [Pro34]-NPY dose-dependently increased arterial pressure in the anaesthetized rat with a similar magnitude and potency. NPY 2-36 was much less potent than NPY 1-36. NPY 4-36 and NPY 11-36 were inactive even at a dose as high as 10 nmol kg-1. 3. NPY 1-36, [Pro34]-NPY, NPY 2-36 and NPY 5-36 concentration-dependently increased the coronary resistance in the Langendorff preparation of the rat. NPY 1-36 and [Pro34]-NPY were equipotent, while NPY 2-36 and NPY 5-36 were about 7 and 20 times less potent. At 0.3 microM, NPY 11-36, NPY 20-36 and NPY 22-36 induced a slight contraction while NPY 23-36 was inactive. 4. NPY 1-36, [Pro34]-NPY, NPY 2-36, NPY 4-36, NPY 5-36 and NPY 11-36 evoked concentration-dependent contractions in the isolated inferior caval vein of the rat and guinea-pig. [Pro34]-NPY was more potent than NPY 1-36. NPY 2-36 was equipotent with NPY 1-36, while NPY 4-36, NPY 5-36 and NPY 11-36 were approximately 30 times less potent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neuropeptide Y induced attenuation of catecholamine synthesis in the rat mesenteric arterial bed

The effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on the basal and nerve stimulation-induced increase in norepinephrine synthesis was studied in the isolated and perfused mesenteric arterial bed of the rat. Tyrosine hydroxylation, the rate-limiting step in catecholamine (CA) biosynthesis, was assessed by measuring the accumulation of DOPA in the perfusate/superfusate overflow after perfusion of the mesenteric arterial bed with the decarboxylase inhibitor m-hydroxybenzyl hydralazine (NSD-1015). Treatment with NDS-1015 resulted in a time-dependent increase in DOPA production and nerve stimulation (8 Hz, supramaximal voltage, 2 ms duration) increased DOPA production even further. NPY 1 to 100 nM was observed to produce a concentration-dependent attenuation in both the basal and nerve stimulation-induced increase in DOPA formation.To come to an understanding of the NPY receptor subtype mediating the inhibition of CA synthesis, the rank order of potency of a series of NPY analogs with varying selectivity for NPY receptor subtypes including intestinal polypeptide (PYY), PYY 13-36, Leu36 Pro34 NPY, human pancreatic polypeptide (h-PP), and rat pancreatic polypeptide (r-PP) were determined. In addition, the effect of various selective NPY antagonists on the inhibitory effect of NPY was also examined. These included the Y1 antagonist BIB03304, the Y2 antagonist BIIE0246, and the Y5 antagonist CGP71683. The IC50's for NPY, PYY, PYY13-36, Leu31 Pro34 NPY, and hPP in inhibiting CA synthesis were 5, 7, 15, 30, and 33 nM respectively. rPP failed to inhibit CA synthesis. All 3 of the NPY antagonists produced attenuation of the NPY-induced inhibition of CA synthesis, but it took a combination of all 3 to completely block the effect of a maximal inhibitory concentration of NPY.These results demonstrate that NPY inhibits CA synthesis in the perfused mesenteric arterial bed and can do so by activation of a variety of receptors including the Y1, Y2, and Y5.     

Neuropeptide Y inhibits potassium-stimulated glutamate release through Y2 receptors in rat hippocampal slices in vitro.

1. We investigated the effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY), NPY13-36, NPY18-36, [Leu31][Pro34]NPY and of pancreatic polypeptide Y (PPY) on calcium-dependent, potassium-stimulated glutamate release in superfused rat hippocampal slices. 2. NPY, PYY and the Y2 receptor agonist NPY13-36 equipotently inhibited the release of glutamate. The half-maximal response was observed at about 10 nM in a dose-dependent manner (3 to 100 nM). Maximal inhibition of 50 to 60% was obtained at 100 nM. At higher concentrations of the peptides (300 nM and 1 microM) this inhibition was partially or entirely reversed. Porcine NPY13-36 and NPY18-36 inhibited glutamate release by about 44% at 100 nM. 3. The specific Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu31][Pro34]NPY, caused an insignificant increase in glutamate release at 100 to 300 nM concentrations. PPY had no effect on potassium-evoked glutamate release in hippocampal slices at concentrations of 30 nM to 1 microM. 4. The experiments support previous electrophysiological data. They suggest a potent inhibitory action of NPY through NPY-Y2 receptors on the release of the excitatory amino acid glutamate in rat hippocampus. Especially under conditions of increased NPY synthesis, such as in epilepsy, this mechanism may be of pathophysiological relevance.     

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors in HEL cells: comparison of binding and functional parameters for full and partial agonists and a non-peptide antagonist.

1. We have compared the binding and Ca2+ mobilizing properties of various full agonists, partial agonists and a non-peptide antagonist at the neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor of human erythroleukemia (HEL) cells. 2. [125I]-NPY binding to intact HEL cells was rapid, saturable, of high affinity and with a specificity typical for the Y1-like subtype: NPY, peptide YY (PYY) and [Pro34]-NPY competed for [125I]-NPY binding with high affinity whereas NPY13-36 and NPY18-36 had only low affinity. 3. NPY, PYY and [Pro34]-NPY potently increased intracellular Ca2+ in HEL cells and had equal efficacy. NPY13-36, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) increased intracellular Ca2+ only poorly. 4. Whereas VIP and PP did not significantly affect NPY-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization, NPY13-36 inhibited NPY-stimulated Ca2+ increases and shifted the NPY concentration-response curve to the right without altering its maximal effect. 5. The agonist (pEC50) potencies of the various peptides corresponded well with the affinities of these compounds in the binding assay (pKi), whereas the antagonist potencies (pKb) of the peptide partial agonists and the pA2 value of the non-peptide NPY antagonist (He 90481), calculated from functional data, were lower than the respective affinities determined in the binding studies. 6. A plot of the fractional Ca2+ response vs the fractional receptor occupancy did not reveal any non-linear receptor-effector coupling for NPY or [Pro34]-NPY; a small receptor reserve might exist for PYY. 7. We conclude that the binding and functional properties of HEL cell NPY receptors are very similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)