The optimal initial management of children with suspected appendicitis: a decision analysis

Background/purpose

As abdominal imaging has improved, the use of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) for evaluating children with suspected appendicitis has increased. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal management strategy for evaluating children with suspected appendicitis given the current accuracy of abdominal imaging.

Methods

Decision analysis was used to evaluate 5 management strategies: discharge, observation, CT, US, and appendectomy. Probabilities and time variables were obtained from publications and a chart review. Each approach was evaluated for its impact on length of stay, hospital charges, cost effectiveness and its capacity to minimize perforation and avoid negative appendectomy (risk-benefit).

Results

Discharge was preferred when the probability of appendicitis was low (<0.09 to <0.47), imaging when in an intermediate range and surgery when high (>0.61 to >0.91). A role for observation was found only when the anticipated time of inpatient observation was brief (<9 hours). Although CT was more expensive than US, CT was more cost effective for preventing negative appendectomy and perforation and achieved a better risk-benefit.

Conclusions

CT has an important role in the management of suspected appendicitis. Among children with a low or high likelihood of appendicitis, the cost of imaging tests required to prevent the complications of appendicitis is high.     

Changing management of suspected appendicitis in the laparoscopic era

INTRODUCTION

The aims of this study were to examine the trends in performance of open and laparoscopic appendicectomy at a district general hospital, and to compare the diagnostic outcomes in the two patient groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected prospectively from patients undergoing an open or laparoscopic procedure for cted appendicitis in an 8-year period between January 2000 and December 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 1700 patients (873 women, 827 men) with a median age of 24 years underwent surgery for suspected appendicitis in the study period. There were 1357 patients (group A) who underwent an open procedure for presumed appendicitis (610 women and 747 men [F:M ratio, 1:1.2]). There were 343 patients (group B) who underwent laparoscopy with or without laparoscopic appendicectomy (82 men and 261 women [F:M ratio, 1:0.31]). Over the study period, there was an increasing trend towards the performance of laparoscopic procedures for suspected appendicitis, increasing from 4% to 39% of the total per year. In group A, 1172 (86%) patients had appendicular pathology, while the appendix was normal histologi-cally in 178 (13%). Other pathologies were diagnosed intra-operatively in 1%. In group B, 193 patients (56%) had appendicular pathology while in 150 (44%) the appendix was normal. In the subgroup with a normal appendix, 56 patients (37%) had another cause for their symptoms identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is increasingly being performed. Laparoscopy is often used as a diagnostic tool in general surgical patients, particularly women, with lower abdominal pain. In effect, these patients are undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, with or without appendicectomy. This has resulted in a lower positive appendicectomy rate, but a higher yield of diagnoses other than appendicitis, in the laparoscopic group. Overall appendicectomy rates, however, have remained unchanged.     

The evaluation of technetium 99m-citrate scintigraphy in children with suspected appendicitis.

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the use of technetium (Tc) 99m-citrate scan in 30 children whose diagnoses of appendicitis were unclear. METHODS: There were 17 boys and 13 girls (mean age 10.6 years). Nineteen of 30 patients had appendicitis confirmed at laparotomy and through histological examination, and 11 patients had other causes of acute abdominal pain. RESULTS: Children included in this study were similar with respect to age, duration of symptoms, temperature, white blood cell count, and the incidence of right lower quadrant tenderness. Sixteen children had positive scan for acute appendicitis, but 1 of them had false-positive. Fourteen children had negative scan, but 4 of them had false-negative. The calculated values were 78.9% (15 of 19), 90.9% (10 of 11), 83.3% (25 of 30), 93.7% (15 of 16), and 71.4% (10 of 14) for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prediction, and negative prediction, respectively, in this study. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest the use of 99mTc-citrate scan in children when the diagnosis of appendicitis using other methods is unclear.     

The incidence and value of rectal examination in children with suspected appendicitis.

Rectal examination is considered an important part of the examination of patients presenting with abdominal pain. However, children find anal digitation unpleasant and it was our impression that doctors were becoming less insistent on performing a rectal examination. We performed an audit of rectal examination and assessed whether this made any difference to the management of children with acute abdominal pain. We looked at the records of 48 children from 1989 and 49 children from 1985 presenting with abdominal pain. We found that the rate of rectal examination was halved in this time. Diagnostic accuracy was similar in the two groups, and the morbidity rate was the same. These findings call into question the need for routine rectal examination in children with suspected appendicitis.     

An economic evaluation of sonographic examination of children with suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency presenting in the pediatric population. Approximately one third of these patients present with equivocal signs and symptoms frequently resulting in inpatient observation or additional diagnostic investigation. Although sonographic examination of patients with suspected appendicitis has been shown to be a highly accurate diagnostic modality, the cost effectiveness of this technology in the pediatric population has not been addressed. The economic value of this examination can be evaluated using a structured decision analysis. METHODS: The authors constructed a decision analysis model of treatment strategies for 2 groups of patients with a suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Patients were categorized as either presenting with a "definitive acute abdomen" or "equivocal examination." Data drawn from published literature reports of the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, institution-specific cost data, and expert judgment were used to construct 2 decision trees. These data were used to determine the least costly diagnostic strategy for each group of patients, and sensitivity analysis performed to assess the robustness of the conclusions. RESULTS: The use of ultrasonography in patients with "an acute abdomen" is not cost efficient and results in average additional cost of $234 per patient. In patients with equivocal diagnoses who are discharged from the emergency room after a negative ultrasound examination finding results in an average cost savings of $260 when compared with admission and observation. Patients who are discharged without examination incur an average additional cost of $373 as a result of the high cost of a missed diagnosis resulting in a perforated appendix. CONCLUSION: The use of ultrasonography can be recommended for children with suspected appendicitis and equivocal examinations who are discharged from the emergency room after a negative examination result.     

The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis

The negative appendectomy rate in patients with clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis is 20 to 40 per cent. Recently CT has emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis and its routine use has been advocated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of selective use of abdominal CT on the negative appendectomy rate. Three hundred eight patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Abdominal CT was performed in patients with uncertain clinical signs of appendicitis. CT was not performed in patients with either a very high or a very low index of suspicion. The results were compared with a retrospective analysis of 85 consecutive patients operated by clinical diagnosis alone. One hundred twenty-seven patients had a final diagnosis of acute appendicitis. CT was performed in 198 patients (64%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT scans were 91, 92, and 91 per cent, respectively. Surgical management plans were altered in 54 patients after obtaining the CT results; unnecessary delay in surgical treatment or unnecessary operations were prevented in 28 and 26 patients, respectively. In addition CT detected unrelated pathologies in 23 patients. CT was not performed in patients with low index of suspicion and none were found to suffer from acute appendicitis. The negative appendectomy rate was 17 per cent (7% men and 24% women) in patients selected for surgery on the basis of very high clinical suspicion alone. Overall the negative appendectomy rate with the selective use of CT was 16 per cent, which is significantly lower than the rate achieved by diagnosing patients on clinical grounds alone (24%). CT is highly accurate in diagnosing or ruling out acute appendicitis and may substantially decrease the negative appendectomy rate as well as unnecessary delayed observation. We believe that CT should be performed routinely in women with suspected appendicitis and selectively in men.     

Diagnostic accuracy in 267 patients with suspected appendicitis: a retrospective study

Despite what is commonly believed, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is not always easy. Proof of this is the high rate of negative appendicectomies performed yearly in any surgery unit. "Unnecessary" operations involve a huge waste of resources and are sometimes associated with severe complications. In an attempt to obtain a more accurate diagnosis many authors recommend the routine use of sophisticated investigations, which are not always non-invasive and sometimes fail to yield encouraging results. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse a group of patients with suspected appendicitis and establish whether certain clinical and instrumental parameters may improve the surgeon's management of such cases and reduce the misdiagnosis rate. Our false-positive rate is in line with those of other studies conducted with the routine use of advanced diagnostic tests without any waste of financial resources or increase in time to diagnosis. These data suggest the superiority of traditional guidelines, based on a careful clinical diagnosis and on common laboratory examinations and ultrasonography, while advanced investigations should be reserved for diagnosing the few ambiguous cases, which are generally confined to more elderly patients.     

The impact of intraoperative culture on treatment and outcome in children with perforated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Most protocols for the operative treatment of perforated appendicitis use a routine culture. Although isolated studies suggest that routine culture may not be necessary, these recommendations generally are not based on objective outcome data. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 308 children who underwent operative treatment for perforated appendicitis between 1988 and 1998 to determine if information gained from routine culture changes the management or improves outcome. Inclusion criteria included either gross or microscopic evidence of appendiceal perforation. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 7.5 years, 51% were boys, and there was no mortality. The majority of children (96%) underwent culture that was positive for either aerobes (21%), anaerobes (19%), or both (57%). Antibiotics were changed in only 16% of the patients in response to culture results. The use of empiric antibiotics, as compared with modified antibiotics, was associated with a lower incidence of infectious complication, shorter fever duration, and decreased length of hospitalization. We also investigated the relationship between culture isolates and antibiotic regimens with regard to outcome. The utilization of antibiotics suitable for the respective culture isolate or organism sensitivity was associated with an increased incidence of infectious complication and longer duration of both fever and length of hospitalization. Finally, the initial culture correlated poorly with subsequent intraabdominal culture (positive predictive value, 11%). CONCLUSION: These outcome data strongly suggest that the practice of obtaining routine cultures can be abandoned, and empiric broad spectrum antibiotic coverage directed at likely organisms is completely adequate for treatment of perforated appendicitis in children.     

B超检查对儿童急性阑尾炎的诊断价值

目的　探讨B超检查对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。方法　对 15 2例临床疑为急性阑尾炎的患儿予以急诊腹部B超检查。结果　 63例超声诊断为急性阑尾炎 ,其中 5 9例急诊行切除阑尾术 ;另 4例因阑尾肿块行非手术治疗 6个月后延期手术 ,术后病理均证实诊断无误。其余 89例中 ,B超检查发现 4例为卵巢黄体破裂 ,2例胆总管囊肿 ,1例大网膜囊肿 ,1例肾积水 ,1例肾结石 ;80例考虑为肠系膜淋巴结炎 ,予非手术治疗 ,其中 76例痊愈 ,4例因症状不消失仍施以阑尾切除术 ,病理报告 2例为化脓性阑尾炎 ,2例为单纯性阑尾炎。结论　结合临床症状和体征 ,B超对阑尾炎的诊断有其实用价值     

The avoidable excesses in the management of perforated appendicitis in children

During a five-year period from 1979 to 1985, 100 consecutive children with perforated appendicitis were managed at our institution. These patients were divided into two groups, which were determined by length of illness and physical findings. Group A consisted of 88 children with signs and symptoms of peritonitis from appendiceal perforation. They were treated with fluid resuscitation, antipyretics, and triple antibiotics (ampicillin, gentamicin, clindamycin), and appendectomy within a few hours of hospitalization. Saline lavage was used. Group B was composed of 12 patients with a periappendiceal mass without generalized peritonitis who had symptoms of 6 to 12 days duration. They were treated nonoperatively with triple antibiotics and underwent interval appendectomy 4 to 6 weeks later. The complication rate for Group A was 6.8%. This included three wound infections (3.4%), one intra-abdominal abscess (1.1%), one patient with pneumonia and ileus (1.1%), and a small bowel obstruction (1.1%). These results are equivalent to the lowest complication rate reported in the literature, in which the treatment included transperitoneal drainage, antibiotic lavage, and parenteral antibiotics. Group B patients had a 16.7% complication rate, which included one small bowel obstruction and one recurrent intra-abdominal abscess. Our method of management resulted in the lowest complication rate reported to date in children with perforated appendicitis. Transperitoneal drainage, delayed wound closure, and antibiotic lavage were not used. Subcuticular incisional closure resulted in minimal wound care and excellent cosmetic results. The experience demonstrates that with proper timing of surgery and appropriate use of contemporary antibiotics, the morbidity of perforated appendicitis can be limited and excesses of treatment can be avoided.     

Imaging for evaluation of suspected cervical spine trauma: a 2-year analysis

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of radiography in screening trauma patients with suspected injury to the cervical spine. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 2 years, 5172 people were admitted to our trauma service and 297 (5.4%) were found to have cervical fractures. The radiographic and CT films and reports of 245 of these 297 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The 245 subjects had sustained 309 distinct individual injuries. Radiography detected injuries in 108 cases (44.1%) and CT detected injuries in 243 cases (99.2%). The two fractures missed by CT occurred at C2; one fracture was obscured by dental artefacts and the other was in the horizontal plane of the scan. Both fractures were detected on lateral radiographs of the region. CONCLUSION: CT is superior to radiography for identification of cervical spine fractures. The fractures most likely to be missed by CT occur at C2. We recommend that CT be used as the primary screening method for people with suspected cervical injury, together with a single lateral view of the cervical spine to include the C2 region.     

Our experience with selective laparoscopy through an open appendectomy incision in the management of suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND: An accurate preoperative diagnosis of suspected appendicitis at times can be extremely difficult. We report our experience with a simple strategy of selective laparoscopy through an open appendectomy incision after finding a noninflamed appendix in the management of suspected appendicitis. METHODS: Patients presenting with suspected appendicitis after regular office hours (6 pm to 8 am weekdays and weekends) were recruited prospectively from January 2002 to December 2003. Laparoscopy through an open appendectomy incision was performed only when the appendix was found to be normal. RESULTS: Twenty-five (18.5%) of 135 patients underwent laparoscopy through an open appendectomy incision because of a normal-looking appendix. Laparoscopy through an open appendectomy incision helped to identify additional intra-abdominal pathology in 13 (52%) of the 25 patients; thus improving the overall detection rate of underlying pathology from 81.5% (110 of 135) to 91.2% (123 of 135). CONCLUSIONS: Selective laparoscopy through an open appendectomy incision in patients with a noninflamed appendix is a simple technique that can identify potentially fatal pathology and also maintains a valuable training opportunity for young surgeons to perform open abdominal surgery. We recommend using this technique in the management of suspected appendicitis.     

Early versus late surgical management of complicated appendicitis in children: A statewide database analysis with one-year follow-up

Background

Complicated appendicitis is common in children, yet the timing of surgical management remains controversial. Some support initial antibiotics with delayed operation whereas others support immediate operation. While a few randomized trials have evaluated this question, they have been small, single-center trials with limited follow-up. We present a database analysis of outcomes in early versus late surgical management of complicated appendicitis with one-year follow-up.