Clinical application of NMP22 and urinary cytology in patients with hematuria or a history of urothelial carcinoma

For evaluation of the clinical application of immunoassay for nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22 immunoassay) and urinary cytology for early diagnosis and detection of bladder cancer in patients with hematuria and/or a previous history of bladder cancer, 209 urine samples obtained from 137 patients presenting episodes of hematuria or a history of bladder cancer were assayed for NMP22 levels and/or prepared for cytology examination. Biopsy was performed when any visible tumor was identified during cystoscopy examination. The median NMP22 concentrations measured in samples taken from patients with active bladder cancer, from patients with a history of bladder cancer but no active disease, from patients with hematuria, and from healthy volunteers were 18.95, 5.45, 6.39, and 3.75 U/ml, respectively. The urinary NMP22 level recorded for patients with urothelial carcinoma was significantly higher than that noted for individuals without active disease. The sensitivity of the NMP22 assay and of urinary cytology in diagnosing bladder cancer was 69% and 67%, respectively. In contrast, the specificity of these two diagnostic modalities reached 72% and 93%, respectively. The NMP22 assay is slightly more sensitive but less specific than urinary cytology in detecting bladder cancer. This study indicates that determination of urinary NMP22 levels is a useful and noninvasive tool for the detection of bladder cancer because of its high sensitivity. The urinary NMP22 assay may be used as a first-line routine screening method; however, it cannot replace the use of urinary cytology because of its lower specificity.     

Urinary markers in screening patients with hematuria

Hematuria is a common presenting symptom of urothelial malignancy. Although conventional urine analysis is very sensitive in detecting the presence of hematuria, it is not specific in detecting bladder cancer or other urinary-tract cancers. The noninvasive urinary tests NMP22 and UroVysion have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for bladder cancer screening. These tests have better sensitivity than cytology for detecting bladder cancer in patients who present with hematuria. The positive predictive values of both tests increase in individuals with hematuria who have risk factors for bladder cancer. Evaluating hematuria with sensitive markers, such as NMP22 and UroVysion, in high-risk populations offers an opportunity to develop effective strategies for bladder cancer screening.     

几种新瘤标对膀胱癌早期诊断价值的比较

目的：比较几种新瘤标对膀胱移行细胞癌早期诊断的价值。方法：对322例肉眼或镜检血尿、膀胱刺激症状或发现膀胱占位者，在作膀胱镜检查前行尿液中细胞角蛋白20(CK20)、核基质蛋白(NMP22)、ImmunoCyt、膀胱肿瘤抗原(BTA stat)检测和常规尿细胞学检查，比较它们的敏感性和特异性。结果：经膀胱镜和病理检查诊断膀胱移行细胞癌149例，其中浅表性肿瘤110例，浸润性39例；G181例，G246例．G322例。CK20、NMP22、ImmunoCyt、BTA stat、尿细胞学和膀胱镜检的敏感性分别为90．6％、85．2％、82．6％、65．8％、30．2％和94．6％，特异性分别为83．6％、84．0％、78．1％、64％、100％和100％。结论：新瘤标CK20、NMP22、ImmunoCyt具有较高的敏感性，与BTA stat和尿细胞学比较，差异有统计学意义，可用于膀胱肿瘤的早期诊断。     

NMP22与BTA stat检测在膀胱肿瘤诊断中的应用

目的评价NMP22和BTAstat诊断膀胱肿瘤的价值.方法对82例临床怀疑膀胱肿瘤的患者,在膀胱镜检查前将尿样分为3份,分别进行NMP22、BTAstat和脱落细胞学检测,分析比较3种方法的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测价值.结果82例中病理证实膀胱肿瘤32例,其他疾病50例.NMP22诊断膀胱肿瘤敏感性为87.5%,与BTAstat(65.6%)、细胞学(21.9%)比较,差别有显著性意义(P<0.05).3种方法诊断特异性分别为84.0%、64.0%和100.0%.阳性预测值分别为77.8%、53.9%和100.0%.结论NMP22是一种简单、敏感、非侵袭性的早期诊断膀胱肿瘤的肿瘤标记物.     

NMP22 is a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer

PURPOSE: The early diagnosis of bladder cancer is central to its effective treatment. This study was designed to determine the clinical use of NMP22 as a urinary marker for the early detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in patients with hematuria or other indications at risk for malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 test were compared with urinary cytology, and the results of both tests were then compared to cystoscopic findings. We also determined if NMP22 provided a cost advantage over our current modalities in our patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each patient submitted a single voided urine which was divided in 2 parts, of which 1 was stabilized with the NMP22 urine collection kit and 1 was preserved in the appropriate cytology medium for cytopathological testing. All patients provided the urine samples before cystoscopic examination. Of the 330 patients 114 (34.5%) presented with microscopic hematuria and 66 (20.4%) with gross hematuria. Other indications for cystoscopy included atypical cytology or unexplained voiding symptoms refractory to medical therapy. RESULTS: There were 18 patients with biopsy confirmed bladder cancer and 312 with benign conditions of the bladder. Median NMP22 value for the malignant bladder tumors was 31.6 units per ml. (95% confidence interval 13.4 to 90.9) and 4.3 units per ml. (3.8 to 4.8) for benign conditions of the bladder. The urinary NMP22 values in the bladder cancer group were significantly higher than those in the benign condition group (p <0.001). The sensitivity of NMP22 was 100% with a specificity of 85% at a reference value of 10.0 units per ml., while cytology had a sensitivity of only 33% and specificity of 100%. Given a negative predictive value of 100% for NMP22, a cost savings of $28,302 to $111,072 (depending on the type of insurance carrier) would have been achieved if it was used alone as the indication for cystoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that urinary NMP22 is a simple, noninvasive, cost-effective marker for the detection of bladder cancer.     

Tumor marker tests in bladder cancer

The gold standard for detecting bladder cancer is cystoscopy which identifies nearly all papillary and sessile lesions. However, it is an invasive procedure causing some discomfort for patients. Urine cytology is the standard non-invasive marker with very high specificity, but unfavourable poor sensitivity for Ta, G1, and T1 bladder tumors. To improve early detection of bladder cancer as well as to monitor treatment response and tumor recurrence, bladder tumor markers are eligible. An ideal bladder cancer test would have the potential to replace or delay cystoscopy in the follow-up of bladder cancer patients. In recent years, the FDA approved non-invasive tumor marker tests ImmunoCyt / uCyt+, BTA TRAK, BTA stat, NMP22, NMP22 BladderChek, and UroVysion have been investigated. The tests demonstrated higher sensitivity for diagnosis of bladder cancer compared to urine cytology. Overall, the mean sensitivity and mean specificity was 64-80% and 71-95% and the mean positive and negative predictive values to detect malignancy were 49-84% and 79-95%, respectively. BTA TRAK, BTA stat, NMP22, and NMP22 BladderChek assays are limited by false-positive results in patients with benign urological diseases such as hematuria, urocystitis, renal calculi or urinary tract infections. Due to low specificity BTA TRAK, BTA stat, NMP22, and NMP22 BladderChek should not be used without first ruling out benign or malignant genitourinary disease other than bladder cancer. With the exception of UroVysion achieving 80% sensitivity and 94% specificity, none of these non-invasive tests revealed a high sensitivity and specificity at the same time, which is a main demand to be made on an ideal tumor marker. Insufficient sensitivity along with limited specificity does not allow replacing cystoscopy in diagnosis of bladder cancer or treatment decisions based on a positive test result.     

核基质蛋白22在膀胱移行上皮癌诊断中的价值(附48例报告)

目的:评价患者尿中核基质蛋白22(NMP 22)在泌尿系上皮肿瘤诊断中的意义。方法:采用ELISA法测定48例膀胱移行上皮肿瘤患者尿中NMP 22的值,并与尿脱落细胞学检查进行比较。结果:48例膀胱移行上皮肿瘤患者尿NMP 22的中位值为19.53 IU/L。以10 IU/L为临界值,NMP 22诊断膀胱移行上皮肿瘤的敏感性为86.96％,特异性为50％;尿脱落细胞学检查的敏感性为17.39％,特异性为100％。尿NMP 22在肿瘤的分期、分级间的差别无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论:尿NMP 22检测比尿脱落细胞学检查更敏感,可以作为血尿患者和既往膀胱肿瘤患者的首选筛选方法。     

Comparison of the nuclear matrix protein 22 with voided urine cytology in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

Several urinary markers for transitional cell carcinoma have been investigated, including urine cytology, bladder tumor antigen, autocrine motility factor receptor and fibrin degradation products. Unfortunately, they have poor overall sensitivity. The United States Food and Drug Administration have recently approved nuclear matrix protein (NMP 22) for the detection of occult or rapidly recurring disease after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. The objective of the current study was to assess the sensitivity of NMP 22 for the detection of bladder carcinoma, as well as to correlate the NMP 22 values with multiplicity of tumor, tumor size, configuration, stage and grade respectively. A total of 78 patients (38 with bladder cancer) provided a urine sample which was divided into appropriate aliquots for each of urine cytology and NMP 22. Comparative results demonstrate a clear superiority of NMP 22 in bladder cancer detection (52.6% vs 31.6% sensitivity), while specificity was in favor of urine cytology (100% vs 82.5%). For superficial tumors, sensitivity was 78.5% for NMP 22 and 41.6% for cytology and for invasive cancers, sensitivity was 90% for NMP 22 and 60% for cytology. Urinary NMP 22 levels were significantly correlated with tumor grade and were significantly higher in large tumors than small tumors. NMP 22 test results showed sufficient sensitivity in comparison with urine cytology for the detection of transitional cell carcinoma. However, we do not think that it is a useful tool as a substitute for endoscopic examination for the detection and surveillance in bladder cancer.     

Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein,fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors

PURPOSE: We evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22, Matritech, Newton, Massachusetts), fibronectin and urinary bladder cancer antigen (UBC, IDL Biotech, Borlange, Sweden) compared with voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 168 patients provided a single voided urine sample for NMP22, fibronectin an ideal monoclonal for urinary bladder cancer and cytology before cystoscopy. Cystoscopy was done for all patients as the reference standard for identification of bladder cancer. Biopsy of any suspicious lesion was performed for histopathological examination. Of the 168 cases 100 were histologically diagnosed as bladder cancer, whereas the remaining 68 had benign urological disorders. A group of 47 healthy volunteers were also enrolled in this study. Voided urine was evaluated by NMP22, fibronectin and UBC, and their values were expressed relative to mg. creatinine. RESULTS: The optimal threshold values for NMP22, fibronectin and UBC were calculated by receiver operator characteristics curves as 27 units per mg. creatinine, 198 mg./mg. creatinine and 13 ng./mg. creatinine, respectively. The levels and positive rates of the 3 parameters were significantly higher in the malignant group compared to either the benign group or normal controls. Of the entire group NMP22, fibronectin and UBC were positive in 93.2%, 91% and 68.2%, respectively in bladder cancer cases with positive cytology. Moreover, these positive rates were significantly higher in bilharzial bladder cancer cases (58.8%, 67.5%, 58.8%, respectively) compared to nonbilharzial cases (35.6%, 36.3%, 31.1%). Overall sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 91.3% for NMP22, 83% and 82.6% for fibronectin, 67% and 80.8% for UBC and 44% and 100% for voided urine cytology. Combined sensitivity of voided urine cytology with the 3 biomarkers together was higher than either combined sensitivity of voided urine cytology with 1 of the biomarkers or than that of the biomarker alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that NMP22 and fibronectin had superior sensitivities compared to UBC and voided urine cytology, while NMP22 and voided urine cytology had the highest specificities. The combined use of markers increased the sensitivity of cytology from 44% to 95.3%. The higher sensitivities of markers in bilharzial than nonbilharzial bladder cancer highlight their clinical use in screening patients with urinary bilharziasis.     

Clinical evaluation of urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 as a marker for bladder cancer]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) as a marker for bladder cancer. We examined the positive rates of NMP22 test, urinary cytology and bladder tumor antigen (BTA) test, and compared the positive rate of NMP22 test with that in urinary cytology and BTA test. Urine samples were obtained from 50 patients with histologically confirmed bladder cancer before the treatment. The samples were examined by NMP22 test, urinary cytology and BTA test. In 50 patients with bladder cancer, the overall positive rate was 40% for NMP22 test, 40% for urinary cytology, and 16% for BTA test. A combination of NMP22 test and urinary cytology showed a significantly higher positive rate (54%) as compared to NMP22 test or urinary cytology alone. When NMP22 test and urinary cytology were compared for tumor size, number, shape, stage and grade, NMP22 test showed a significant higher positive rate than urinary cytology in grade 1 bladder cancer. In conclusion, although NMP22 test and urinary cytology gave a similar positive rate, a combination of NMP22 test and urinary cytology is more useful than the NMP22 test or urinary cytology alone for monitoring of bladder cancer.     

Comparison of the ImmunoCyt test and urinary cytology with other urine tests in the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer

Despite several new urine markers urinary cytology remains the gold standard for the non-invasive detection of bladder carcinoma. The use of monoclonal antibodies against tumor associated antigens offers a promising approach to improve urinary cytology. The aim of this study was to compare fluorescence immunocytology (ImmunoCyt/Ucyt+ test), alone and in combination with the conventional cytology, with other urine markers. Urine samples from 126 patients undergoing cystoscopy were included in the study. Among them, 42 patients had urothelial carcinoma, two dysplasia, two other malignancies, and 78 had no evidence of bladder cancer. Urine samples were taken before any manipulation. We used the ImmunoCyt test and Papanicolaou staining for conventional cytology. The ImmunoCyt slides were examined under a fluorescence microscope. Evaluations of the tests were blinded to clinical and pathological data and were carried out by three independent observers. The results of cytology and ImmunoCyt were compared with the BTAstat, NMP22, Lewis X, 486p3/12, and Urovision tests. The sensitivity for the ImmunoCyt test was 78.3% and for conventional cytology 84.6%. The combination of ImmunoCyt and cytology showed a sensitivity of 89.1%. The specificity was 73.8% for the ImmunoCyt alone, 80.0% for the cytology, and 72.5% for the combination of ImmunoCyt and cytology. Sensitivities for the other tests were 68.8% for (FISH), 66.6% (BTA-Stat), 68.8% (486p3/12), 95.5% (Lewis X), and 71.1% for (NMP22). Specificity was 89.1% for (FISH), 78.2% (BTA-Stat), 76.4% (486p3/12), 32.8% (Lewis X), and 65.5% for (NMP22). Urinary cytology can be improved by immunostaining with monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antibodies. The combination of ImmunoCyt with conventional cytology offers a superior sensitivity to other commercial tests. The ImmunoCyt test provides a useful supplement to urinary cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.M.I. Toma, M.G. Friedrich contributed equally to this study     

Clinical evaluation of urinary NMP22 (nuclear matrix protein 22) bladder chek in the detection of patients with bladder cancer

The clinical usefulness of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) Bladder Chek test as a novel urine marker in the detection of patients with bladder cancer was evaluated in comparison with the urinary NMP22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and urinary cytology. A total of 40 patients with pathologically proven bladder cancer voided urine specimen before treatment. The urine samples were divided for NMP22 Bladder Chek test, NMP22 ELISA, and urinary cytology. In the 40 patients with bladder cancer, the overall positive rate was 62.5% for the NMP22 Bladder Chek test, 55% for the NMP22 ELISA test, and 27.5% for urine cytology. There was a significant difference between NMP22 Bladder Chek, NMP22 ELISA and cytology. The positive rate with the NMP22 Bladder Chek and NMP22 ELISA was higher in the patients with high grade and large-size (1 cm < or =) tumor. In 40 patients presenting with microhematuria without urothelial cancer, the false positive rate 12.5, 10, and 0% for NMP22 Bladder Chek, NMP22 ELISA, and urinary cytology. No significant difference was found with the test. In conclusion, the urine NMP22 Bladder Chek test provided a higher positive rate than the NMP22 ELISA test and urinary cytology. Therefore, the NMP22 Bladder Chek test may be clinically more useful as a tumor marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer.     

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for bladder cancer: a review of the literature

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is the second most common malignancy of the genitourinary tract. Cystoscopy and urine cytology are the traditional most used techniques for diagnosis and surveillance of superficial bladder cancer. Urine cytology is specific for diagnosis of bladder cancer but sensitivity results not high, particularly in low-grade disease. Voided urine can be easily obtained and therefore additional diagnostic urine tests would be ideal for screening or follow-up of transitional cell carcinoma. A number of studies have focused on the evaluation of urinary markers that hold promise as non-invasive adjuncts to conventional diagnostic or surveillance techniques. In this review we discuss several new urinary markers (test for bladder tumor antigen, NMP22, fibrin degradation products, telomerase, fluorescence in situ hybridization test, flow cytometry) and their role in detection and follow-up of bladder cancer. Most of these markers have higher sensitivity than urine cytology, but voided urine cytology has the highest specificity.     

Significance of atypical urinary cytology in the evaluation of patients with end‐stage renal disease for kidney transplantation – a retrospective study

To determine what percentage of renal transplant candidates have atypical urinary cytology, what proportion have urothelial carcinoma and whether cystoscopy is necessary with atypical cytology. All end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients (703) presenting for renal transplantation at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Individuals producing sufficient urine were screened with urine cytology and those with atypical cytology or risk factors for bladder cancer underwent cystoscopy. Four hundred and thirty patients had available urinary cytology and, of these, 151 (35%) had atypical cytology. Of patients with atypical cytology, three were identified to have urothelial carcinoma. However, three additional patients with urothelial carcinoma did not present with atypical cytology. In total, 6 of 703 (0.85%) patients had bladder cancer. All were treated with transurethral resection and eventually underwent renal transplant. One patient has had disease progression post‐transplant to distant metastases. This is the largest study to date evaluating the incidence of urothelial carcinoma in ESRD patients presenting for transplant workup. We found the incidence of bladder cancer to be higher than in the general Canadian population, however, most lesions were low grade. We found atypical cytology in transplant candidates to be a poor predictor for these low‐grade lesions and do not recommend routine cystoscopy for atypical cytology.     

Urine markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer

ObjectivesBladder cancer detection and surveillance includes cystoscopy and cytology. Urinary cytology is limited by its low sensitivity for low-grade tumors. Urine markers have been extensively studied to help improve the diagnosis of bladder cancer with the goal of complementing or even replacing cystoscopy. However, to date, no marker has reached widespread use owing to insufficient evidence for clinical benefit.Material and methodsPubmed/Medline search was conducted to identify original articles, review articles, and editorials regarding urine-based biomarkers for screening, early detection, and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Searches were limited to the English language, with a time frame of 2000 to 2013. Keywords included urothelial carcinoma, bladder cancer, transitional cell carcinoma, biomarker, marker, urine, diagnosis, recurrence, and progression.ResultsAlthough several urinary markers have shown higher sensitivity compared with cytology, it remains insufficient to replace cystoscopy. Moreover, most markers suffer from lower specificity than cytology. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current knowledge on commercially available and promising investigational urine markers for the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.ConclusionsWell-designed protocols and prospective, controlled trials are needed to provide the basis to determine whether integration of biomarkers into clinical decision making will be of value for bladder cancer detection and screening in the future.     

Immunocyt: a new tool for detecting transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract

PURPOSE: The limitations of cytology and the invasiveness of cystoscopy for detecting bladder cancer generate increasing interest in noninvasive, urine bound diagnostic tools. We assessed the diagnostic value of the newly developed immunocytochemical test, Immunocyt, which detects cellular markers specific for transitional cell cancer in the voided urine of patients with bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participating in our prospective study were 264 consecutive patients with a mean age of 65.9 years, including 114 in whom symptoms were suggestive of bladder cancer and 150 who were being followed after complete transurethral resection of superficial transitional cell carcinoma. Voided urine specimens were evaluated by standard cytology and the Immunocyt test, which traces the monoclonal antibodies M344, LDQ10 and 19A211 against transitional cell carcinoma in exfoliated urothelial cells. In all cases cystoscopy was subsequently performed and any suspicious lesion was evaluated by biopsy. RESULTS: Histologically proved transitional cell carcinoma was found in 79 patients. Immunocyt with cytology had 89.9% sensitivity overall (84, 88 and 96.5% in grades 1 to 3 disease, respectively). A total of 34 (43%), 3 (3.8%) and 34 (43%) cases were positive on Immunocyt only, cytology only and both evaluations, respectively. In 8 cases (10.1%) both tests were negative. Overall Immunocyt only was 86.1% sensitive (84, 84 and 89.6% in grades 1 to 3 disease, respectively) and 79.4% specific. Overall cytology only was 46.8% sensitive (4, 52 and 79.3% in grades 1 to 3 disease, respectively) and 98.2% specific. CONCLUSIONS: Immunocyt is a noninvasive, highly sensitive test for detecting transitional cell carcinoma of all grades and stages. When combined with conventional urinary cytology, it may replace cystoscopy in select patients, especially in followup protocols of low grade transitional cell carcinoma.     

膀胱癌患者尿NMP22与尿脱落细胞学检测的临床价值

目的研究核基质蛋白22（NMP22）与尿脱落细胞学在膀胱癌早期诊断、监测复发及判断预后中的临床价值。方法收集96份尿液标本,其中包括45例膀胱癌术前患者（经术后病理证实）,20例膀胱癌术后复测患者及3l例良性泌尿系疾病患者。均通过酶联免疫吸附法（ELISA）检测NMP22值,将其结果与尿脱落细胞学通过,检验的形式进行对比。结果45例膀胱癌术前患者NMP22的含量为9．3—112．5U／mL,中位数为48．7U／mL;31例良性泌尿系患者NMP22的含量为2．1～14．7U／mL,中位数为7．9U／mL;20例膀胱癌术后患者NMP22的含量为4．3～18．7U／mL,中位数为8．9U／mL,膀胱癌术前患者NMP22中位数明显高于良性泌尿系患者NMP22中位数,差异有显著统计学意义（P〈0．05）。以NMP22≥10U／mL为临界值,NMP22诊断膀胱癌的敏感性为82．2％,特异性为70．9％;尿细胞学的敏感性为31．1％。特异性为100％。20例膀胱癌术后患者经膀胱镜证实复发有9例。结论NMP22可以作为膀胱癌的早期筛查和术后随访的有效标志物。     

Comparisons of voided urine cytology, nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumor associated antigen tests for bladder cancer of geriatric male patients in Taiwan, China

Aim： To compare the results of bladder tumor associated antigen （BTA TRAK）, nuclear matrix protein 22 （NMP 22） and voided urine cytology （VUC） in detecting bladder cancer. Methods： A total of 135 elderly male and 50 healthy volunteers enrolled in this study were classified into three groups： （i） 93 patients with bladder cancer; （ii） 42 patients with urinary benign conditions; and （iii） 50 healthy volunteers. BTA TRAK and NMP 22 kits were used to detect bladder cancer. Voided urine cytology was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tests. Results： The sensitivity and specificity of cytology, BTA TRAK and NMP 22 were 24% and 97%, 51% and 73%, 78% and 73%, respectively. The level of NMP 22 increased with tumor grading. The BTA TRAK kit has the lowest sensitivity among the screening tests. The NMP 22 with the best sensitivity can be an adjunct to cytology for evaluating bladder cancer. Conclusion： The NMP 22 test has a better correlation with the grading of the bladder cancer than BTA TRAK. As cytology units are typically not available in hospitals or in outpatient clinics, NMP 22 might be a promising tool for screening bladder cancer.     

核基质蛋白22检测与尿脱落细胞学检查在膀胱癌诊断中的价值

目的　探讨尿核基质蛋白 2 2 (NMP 2 2 )检测和尿脱落细胞学检查在膀胱移行细胞癌诊断中的价值。　方法　对 15 5例怀疑膀胱癌者进行尿NMP 2 2与尿细胞学检查 ,其中 95例经组织学证实为膀胱移行细胞癌。比较两者诊断膀胱癌的敏感性和特异性。　结果　尿NMP 2 2的敏感性为6 5 .3%、特异性为 70 .0 % ;尿细胞学的敏感性为 4 3.2 %、特异性为 83.3%。NMP 2 2在膀胱癌不同分级和分期中的敏感性优于尿细胞学 (P <0 .0 5 )。　结论　尿NMP 2 2检测在早期诊断膀胱癌方面优于尿细胞学检查 ,可以作为膀胱癌的早期检测指标。     

Urinary level of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: experience with 130 patients with biopsy confirmed tumor

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the value of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22dagger) and cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed NMP22 in voided urine from 235 patients before cystoscopy. Of the patients 130 had transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and subsequently underwent surgery. In a subset of 200 patients bladder washout samples for cytology were collected during cystoscopy. The cutoff for NMP22 was 10.0 units per ml. For cytology only high grade atypia was considered positive. RESULTS: Histology showed 77 superficial (pTa, pTis) and 53 invasive (pT1 or greater) tumors. Sensitivity of NMP22 was 51% and specificity was 83%. NMP22 sensitivity was 36% for superficial tumors and 73% for invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Overall sensitivity of cytology was 52% and specificity was 89%. Cytology sensitivity was 38% for superficial tumors and 83% for invasive transitional cell carcinoma. NMP22 sensitivity for grades 1, 2 and 3 tumors was 30%, 56% and 68%, respectively. Cytology sensitivity for grades 1, 2 and 3 tumors was 30%, 50% and 91%, respectively. Combined NMP22 and cytology had a sensitivity of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 has sensitivity and specificity similar to those of cytology from bladder washout samples. Particularly in low stage and low grade tumors both tests show the same disappointing sensitivity. Because of a false-negative rate of 49%, NMP22 cannot replace cystoscopy in clinical practice, as the danger of missing NMP22 negative tumors is too high to rely on its results in an individual patient.