首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.

Background

Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in patients with metastatic kidney cancer and are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Although historically associated with a poor prognosis, survival outcomes for patients in the modern era are incompletely characterized. In particular, outcomes after adjusting for systemic therapy administration and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk factors are not well-known.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective database of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center between 2006 and 2015 was created. Data relevant to their diagnosis, treatment course, and outcomes were systematically collected. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with BM were compared with patients without BM after adjusting for the timing of BM diagnosis, either prior to or during first-line systemic therapy. The impact of stratification according to IMDC risk group was assessed.

Results

A total of 56 (28.4%) of 268 patients with metastatic RCC were diagnosed with BM prior to or during first-line systemic therapy. Median overall survival (OS) for systemic therapy-naive patients with BM compared with matched patients without BM was 19.5 versus 28.7 months (P = .0117). When analyzed according to IMDC risk group, the median OS for patients with BM was similar for favorable- and intermediate-risk patients (not reached vs. not reached; and 29.0 vs. 36.7 months; P = .5254), and inferior for poor-risk patients (3.5 vs. 9.4 months; P = .0462). For patients developing BM while on first-line systemic therapy, survival from the time of progression did not significantly differ by presence or absence of BM (11.8 vs. 17.8 months; P = .6658).

Conclusions

Survival rates for patients with BM are significantly better than historical reports. After adjusting for systemic therapy, the survival rates of patients with BM in favorable- and intermediate-risk groups were remarkably better than expected and not statistically different from patients without BM, though this represents a single institution experience, and numbers are modest.  相似文献   

3.
背景与目的:立体定向放疗(stereotacticradiotherapv,SRT)与全脑放疗(wholebrainradiationtherapy’WBRT)是治疗脑转移瘤的主要手段。本文旨在探讨伽玛射线大分割SRT加或不加WBRT对肺癌有限脑转移瘤治疗的疗效。方法:回顾性分析非小细胞肺癌多发脑转移瘤(1~4枚)患者66例,其中单纯SRT30例,SRT+WBRT36例。分析两组患者的临床特征并应用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率.用Logrank法对各因素进行预后分析。结果:两组患者的临床特点无明显区别:SRT组与WBRT+SRT组的中位生存期(MST)分别为12.1与1313个月,二者无显著性差异(P=0.216)。Logrank分析显示卡氏评分(P=0.017)和颅外病变的控制情况(P=0.032)是影响预后的主要因素。结论:SRT是非小细胞肺癌有限脑转移瘤患者有效治疗手段.单纯SRT可取得与WBRT+SRT相似的生存期.  相似文献   

4.
Background: Recently, graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastases has been developed. This includes age, performance status, number of brain metastases and presence of extracranial metastases. The aim of the present study was to validate this four-tiered prognostic score in a European cohort of patients. Methods: The retrospective validation study included 180 patients from two centers in Germany and Norway. Results: Median survival from radiological diagnosis of brain metastases was 7 months. The GPA point sum as continuous variable (0–4 points) was significantly associated with survival (p < 0.001). However, no significant survival difference was observed between patients in the two strata with better survival (3.5–4 and 2.5–3 points, respectively). Long-term survival in the poor prognosis group (0–1 points) was better than expected. Conclusion: This study supports the prognostic impact of all four parameters contributing to the GPA. The original way of grouping the parameters and breaking the final strata did not give optimal results in this cohort. Therefore, additional validation databases from different countries should be created and evaluated.  相似文献   

5.
Brain Metastases in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
Between January 1985 and December 2000, 916 patients with brain metastases were treated with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) at the Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Freiburg. In 47 patients, a primary tumor could not be identified (cancer of unknown primary (CUP)). Sixteen patients had a solitary brain metastasis, 31 patients presented with multiple brain metastases. Surgical resection was performed in 15 patients, biopsy alone in 12 patients. WBRT was applied with daily fractions of 2 or 3Gy to a total dose of 50 or 30Gy, respectively. According to the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group for patients with brain metastases none of the patients met the criteria for Class I, 23 for Class II, and 24 for Class III.The median overall survival (OS) for all patients with brain metastases (n = 916) was 3.4 and 4.8 months for patients with CUP (p = 0.45). In patients with CUP (n = 47) the median OS for patients with a single brain metastasis was 7.3 versus 3.9 months for patients with multiple brain metastases (p = 0.05). Median OS for patients with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 70 was 6.3 months versus 3.2 months for KPS <70 (p = 0.01).At multivariate analysis performance status and resection status could be identified as independent prognostic factors for the OS.  相似文献   

6.
7.
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignancy. Many approaches, including radiation therapy, surgery, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, have been used to treat patients with brain metastases depending on the patient’s disease burden and symptoms. However, stereotactic surgery (SRS) has revolutionized local treatment of brain metastases. Likewise, targeted therapies, including small-molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies that target cancer cell metabolism or angiogenesis, have transformed managing systemic disease. Prospective data on combining these treatments for synergistic effect are limited, but early data show favorable safety and efficacy profiles. The combination of SRS and targeted therapy will further individualize treatment, potentially obviating the need for cytotoxic chemotherapy or whole-brain radiation. There is a great need to pursue research into these exciting modalities and novel combinations to further improve the treatment of patients with brain metastases. This article discusses reported and ongoing clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of targeted therapy during SRS.

Implications for Practice:

Treatment of patients with brain metastases requires a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery is increasingly used in the upfront setting to treat new brain metastasis. Targeted therapies have revolutionized systemic treatment of many malignancies and may sometimes be used as initial treatment in metastatic patients. There is sparse literature regarding safety and efficacy of combining these two treatment modalities. This article summarizes the supporting literature and highlights ongoing clinical trials in combining radiosurgery with targeted therapy.  相似文献   

8.
IntroductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) results in excellent local control of stage I NSCLC. Radiobiology models predict greater tumor response when higher biologically effective doses (BED10) are given. Prior studies support a BED10 greater than or equal to 100 Gy with SBRT; however, data are limited comparing outcomes after various SBRT regimens. We therefore sought to evaluate national trends and the effect of using “low” versus “high” BED10 SBRT courses on overall survival (OS).MethodsThis retrospective study used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage I (cT1-2aN0M0) NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 treated with SBRT. Patients were categorized into LowBED (100-129 Gy) or HighBED (≥130 Gy) groups. A 1:1 matched analysis based on patient and tumor characteristics was used to compare OS by BED10 group. Tumor centrality was not assessed.ResultsO 25,039 patients treated with LowBED (n = 14,756; 59%) or HighBED (n = 10,283; 41%) SBRT, 20,542 were matched. Shifts in HighBED to LowBED SBRT regimen use correlated with key publications in the literature. In the matched cohort, 5-year OS rates were 26% for LowBED and 34% for HighBED groups (p = 0.039). On multivariate analysis, receipt of LowBED was associated with significantly worse survival (hazard ratio = 1.046, 95% confidence interval: 1.004–1.090, p = 0.032).ConclusionsLowBED SBRT for treating stage I NSCLC is becoming more common. However, our findings suggest SBRT regimens with BED10 greater than or equal to 130 Gy may confer an additional survival benefit. Additional studies are required to evaluate the dose-response relationship and toxicities associated with modern HighBED SBRT.  相似文献   

9.
10.
邹菁帆  江滔 《实用癌症杂志》2016,(12):2008-2010
目的 采用吉非替尼联合全脑放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者,分析其治疗效果.方法 选取非小细胞肺癌发生脑转移的患者,实验组患者行吉非替尼联合全脑放疗,对照组仅进行全脑放疗,于治疗前、放疗结束、放疗结束后3个月行头MRI、胸部CT明确肿瘤情况,进行疗效评价,比较其生活质量评分(KPS)、中位生存时间、1年生存率、不良反应.结果 实验组完全缓解(CR)5例,部分缓解(PR) 18例,稳定(SD)6例,进展(PD)1例,有效率(RR)为76.7%,疾病控制率(DCR)为96.7%,高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后实验组KPS评分达(74.5±7.1)分,KPS≥10分占63.3%,中位生存时间为12.2个月,1年生存率为43.3%,均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).2组患者均出现皮疹、恶心、呕吐、腹泻、白细胞下降、转氨酶升高、骨髓抑制等不良反应,实验组的皮疹、恶心、呕吐、骨髓抑制发生率与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).实验组1个月生存率93.3%,3个月生存率76.7%,6个月生存率66.7%,1年生存率50.0%,均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 吉非替尼联合全脑放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者能够明显提高治疗效果,提高患者的生活质量及生存质量,延长生存期,提高生存率,且不良反应较少.  相似文献   

11.
肺癌是中国发病率和死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤,而且在疾病发展过程中易发生脑转移,严重影响患者的生存质量以及生存期。肺癌脑转移的治疗方法包括外科手术、化疗、全脑放射治疗、立体定向放射外科治疗、分子靶向治疗、免疫治疗以及抗血管生成治疗等。对于不同患者如何选择合理且有效的治疗方案是目前研究的热点之一。本文将对肺癌脑转移治疗相关研究进展进行综述,以期为肺癌脑转移患者选择更合理的临床治疗方案提供参考。  相似文献   

12.
AimsStereotactic radiosurgery is increasingly used to treat multiple (four or more) brain metastases. Preserving cognitive functions is a highly relevant treatment goal because cognitive deteriorations may negatively affect a patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess cognitive change, at the group and individual level, in patients with 1 to 10 brain metastases up to 9 months after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS).Materials and methodsNinety-two patients with 1 to 10 newly diagnosed brain metastases, expected survival >3 months and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 and 104 non-cancer controls were included. A neuropsychological test battery was administered before GKRS (n = 92) and at 3 (n = 66), 6 (n = 52) and 9 (n = 41) months after GKRS. The course of test performances, while taking into account practice effects, was analysed using linear mixed models. Pre-GKRS predictors of cognitive trajectories were analysed. To determine proportions of individuals with cognitive changes, reliable change indices, with correction for practice effects, were calculated.ResultsAt the group level, immediate memory, working memory and information processing speed significantly improved over 9 months after GKRS. There were no cognitive declines. Neither number nor volume of brain metastases influenced cognitive change over time. At the individual level, proportions of patients with stable, improved or declined performances were comparable with controls, except for information processing speed (more individuals with improvements in patients) and motor dexterity (more improvements and declines in patients).ConclusionsCognitive functioning in patients with 1 to 10 brain metastases was preserved, or improved, up to 9 months after GKRS. Neither number nor volume of brain metastases influenced cognitive performance.  相似文献   

13.
目的 评价调强放射治疗在脑转移瘤治疗中的疗效.方法 将130例脑转移瘤患者随机分成常规放疗组和调强放射治疗组.常规放疗组64例,先行全脑放射治疗(WBRT)36~40 Gy后,局部缩野加量,总剂量到50~60 Gy,每次2 Gy,5次/周.调强放射治疗组66例,全脑放射治疗剂量39.2~39.6Gy,脑转移灶剂量54~60 Gy,5次周,共23次.结果 治疗结束后3月、6月复查,对1~3个脑转移灶患者,常规放疗组和调强放疗组的中位生存期、有效率(CR+ PR)和1年生存率分别为13月、82%、59%和14月、88%、61%.对于脑转移灶数目大于3个的患者,常规放疗组和调强放疗组的中位生存期、有效率(CR+ PR)和1年生存率分别为9月、73%、47%和13月、87.5%、59%.结论 调强放射治疗可能是多发脑转移瘤患者的一种较常规全脑放疗更有效的治疗手段.  相似文献   

14.
Simple SummaryIn this short communication, we present three cases of patients with symptomatic, synchronous brain metastases of otherwise locally limited non-small cell lung cancer. The patients received local ablative treatment of the brain metastases followed by neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with pemetrexed, cisplatin, and pembrolizumab, and resection of the pulmonary lesion with curative intent. With two of the patients still alive and maintaining a good quality of life with a progression-free survival and overall survival of 28 and 35 months, respectively, this case series illustrates the potential of novel combinatorial treatment approaches.AbstractBrain metastases are a common finding upon initial diagnosis of otherwise locally limited non-small cell lung cancer. We present a retrospective case series describing three cases of patients with symptomatic, synchronous brain metastases and resectable lung tumors. The patients received local ablative treatment of the brain metastases followed by neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with pemetrexed, cisplatin, and pembrolizumab. Afterwards, resection of the pulmonary lesion with curative intent was performed. One patient showed progressive disease 12 months after initial diagnosis, and passed away 31 months after initial diagnosis. Two of the patients are still alive and maintain a good quality of life with a progression-free survival and overall survival of 28 and 35 months, respectively, illustrating the potential of novel combinatorial treatment approaches.  相似文献   

15.
16.
BackgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis, even in the rituximab era. Several studies have reported the clinical importance of the peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in various malignancies, including lymphoma. However, the prognostic value of the LMR in relapsed/refractory DLBCL has not been well evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the LMR at relapse can predict clinical outcomes for relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed data on 74 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, who were initially treated with R-CHOP (rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or an R–CHOP-like regimen.ResultsThere was a significant association between a low LMR (≤ 2.6) and shorter overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001) compared with the high LMR group (> 2.6). Multivariate analysis showed that LMR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P < .001) and PFS (P < .001), as was the international prognostic index (IPI) at relapse for OS. In addition, the LMR had an incremental value for OS and PFS compared with the IPI at relapse.ConclusionThe LMR predicts OS and PFS outcomes in relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, and might facilitate better stratification among patients in low- and intermediate-risk IPI groups.  相似文献   

17.
第15届世界肺癌大会(WCLC)共收到约210篇放疗相关研究的摘要。内容涉及早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)应用体部立体定向放疗(SBRT)的疗效和安全性、评价手段和剂量分割探讨;局部晚期NSCLC同步放化疗中高剂量与标准放疗剂量、不同化疗方案以及是否联合西妥昔单抗的对照研究;经全切的ⅢA~N2期NSCLC患者术后采用三维适行放疗(3D-CRT)的临床意义;NSCLC多发脑转移行全脑放疗(WBRT)同步联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的疗效和安全性以及表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态对疗效的影响。另外关于放疗的防护、毒性、疗效、预后及生活质量评估也多有报告。  相似文献   

18.

Introduction

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) demonstrate an exception in the treatment of brain metastases (BM), because in patients with SCLC whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) only is the preferred treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic score for patients with brain metastases from SCLC treated with WBRT.

Patients and Methods

The present study was conducted utilizing a single-institution, previously described, retrospective database of patients with SCLC who were treated with WBRT (n = 221). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to generate the “brain metastases from SCLC score” (BMS score) based on favorable prognostic factors: Karnofsky performance status (KPS > 70), extracerebral disease status (stable disease/controlled), and time of appearance of BM (synchronous). Furthermore, the disease-specific graded prognostic assessment score as well as the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) were performed and compared with the new BMS score by using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

Results

BMS score and RPA showed the most significant differences between classes (P < .001). BMS score revealed a mean overall survival (OS) of 2.62 months in group I (0-1 points), 6.61 months in group II (2-3 points), and 12.31 months in group III (4 points). The BMS score also identified the group with the shortest survival (2.62 months in group I), and the numbers of patients in each group were most equally distributed with the BMS score.

Conclusion

The new BMS score was more prognostic than the RPA and disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scores. The BMS score is easy to use and reflects known prognostic factors in contemporary patients with SCLC treated with WBRT. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings.  相似文献   

19.
目的分析三维适形放疗(3DCRT)与立体定向放射外科(SRS)对于不能手术切除或拒绝手术治疗的脑胶质瘤的疗效。方法对46例不能手术或拒绝接受手术治疗的脑胶质瘤患者随机分为两组,3DCRT组24例,SRS组22例。3DCRT组施行三维适形放疗,SRS组施行立体定向放射外科治疗。结果3DCRT组患者1、2、3年生存率分别是91.7%、54.2%和8.3%,SRS组分别是80.9%、47.6%、4.8%,两组间比较无显著性差异(P=0.6487)。3DCRT组放射性脑水肿发生率为66.7%,SRS组为95.5%,两组间差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论3DCRT与SRS放射治疗脑胶质瘤生存率相似。SRS放射性脑水肿反应明显高于3DCRT,3DCRT较SRS易为患者耐受。采用非手术疗法治疗脑胶质瘤,3DCRT可能是一种适宜的放射治疗方法。  相似文献   

20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号