处方点评制度对临床合理用药影响的调查分析

目的探讨处方点评制度对临床合理用药的影响。方法随机抽取深圳市宝安区福永人民医院2012-2013年825张处方为调查对象,按是否介入改进的处方点评制度,将调查对象分为非干预组395张(未介入改进的处方点评制度)和干预组430张(介入改进的处方点评制度),比较2组处方基本指标情况及不合理处方比例。结果干预组处方基本指标均较非干预组显著改善,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组的不规范处方、用药不适宜处方及超常处方比例均显著低于非干预组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论处方点评制度能显著提高合理处方比例,降低不合理用药导致的不良反应和医疗费用负担,具有重要的临床应用价值。     

Effect of System-Wide Interventions on the Assessment and Treatment of Pain by Emergency Medical Services Providers

Background: An estimated 20% of patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency department are in moderate to severe pain. However, the management of pain in the prehospital setting has been shown to be inadequate. Untreated pain may have negative physiologic and psychological consequences. The prehospital community has acknowledged this inadequacy and made treatment of pain a priority. Objectives: To determine if system-wide pain management improvement efforts (i.e. education and protocol implementation) improve the assessment of pain and treatment with opioid medications in the prehospital setting and to determine if improvements are maintained over time. Methods: This was a retrospective before and after study of a countywide prehospital patient care database. The study population included all adult patients transported by EMS between February 2004 and February 2012 with a working assessment of trauma or burn. EMS patient care records were searched for documentation of pain scores and opioid administration. Four time periods were examined: 1) before interventions, 2) after pediatric specific pain management education, 3) after pain management protocol implementation, and 4) maintenance phase. Frequencies and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all patients meeting the inclusion criteria in each time period and Chi-square was used to compare frequencies between time periods. Results: 15,228 adult patients transported by EMS during the study period met the inclusion criteria. Subject demographics were similar between the four time periods. Pain score documentation improved between the time periods but was not maintained over time (13% [95%CI 12–15%] to 32% [95%CI 31–34%] to 29% [95 CI 27–30%] to 19% [95%CI 18–21%]). Opioid administration also improved between the time periods and was maintained over time (7% [95%CI 6–8%] to 18% [95%CI 16–19%] to 24% [95%CI 22–25%] to 23% [95% CI 22–24%]). Conclusions: In adult patients both pediatric-focused education and pain protocol implementation improved the administration of opioid pain medications. Documentation and assessment of pain scores was less affected by specific pain management improvement efforts.     

Geriatric Emergency Medicine and the 2006 Institute of Medicine Reports from the Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the U.S. Health System

Three recently published Institute of Medicine reports, Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point, Emergency Medical Services: At the Crossroads, and Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains, examined the current state of emergency care in the United States. They concluded that the emergency medicine system as a whole is overburdened, underfunded, and highly fragmented. These reports did not specifically discuss the effect the aging population has on emergency care now and in the future and did not discuss special needs of older patients. This report focuses on the emergency care of older patients, with the intent to provide information that will help shape discussions on this issue.     

The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Analgesia in Patients with Back Pain in Two Hospitals

Objectives: The authors assessed the association between measures of emergency department (ED) crowding and treatment with analgesia and delays to analgesia in ED patients with back pain. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of nonpregnant patients who presented to two EDs (an academic ED and a community ED in the same health system) from July 1, 2003, to February 28, 2007, with a chief complaint of “back pain.” Each patient had four validated crowding measures assigned at triage. Main outcomes were the use of analgesia and delays in time to receiving analgesia. Delays were defined as greater than 1 hour to receive any analgesia from the triage time and from the room placement time. The Cochrane‐Armitage test for trend, the Cuzick test for trend, and relative risk (RR) regression were used to test the effects of crowding on outcomes. Results: A total of 5,616 patients with back pain presented to the two EDs over the study period (mean ± SD age = 44 ± 17 years, 57% female, 62% black or African American). Of those, 4,425 (79%) received any analgesia while in the ED. A total of 3,589 (81%) experienced a delay greater than 1 hour from triage to analgesia, and 2,985 (67%) experienced a delay more than 1 hour from room placement to analgesia. When hospitals were analyzed separately, a higher proportion of patients experienced delays at the academic site compared with the community site for triage to analgesia (87% vs. 74%) and room to analgesia (71% vs. 63%; both p < 0.001). All ED crowding measures were associated with a higher likelihood for delays in both outcomes. At the academic site, patients were more likely to receive analgesia at the highest waiting room numbers. There were no other differences in ED crowding and likelihood of receiving medications in the ED at the two sites. These associations persisted in the adjusted analysis after controlling for potential confounders of analgesia administration. Conclusions: As ED crowding increases, there is a higher likelihood of delays in administration of pain medication in patients with back pain. Analgesia administration was not related to three measures of ED crowding; however, patients were actually more likely to receive analgesics when the waiting room was at peak levels in the academic ED. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:276–283 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     

The Use of Health Care Policy to Facilitate Evidence-based Knowledge Translation in Emergency Medicine

Health care policy can facilitate emergency medicine knowledge translation (KT). Because of this, the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on KT identified a specific theme regarding issues of health care policy and KT. Six months before the Consensus Conference, international experts in the area were invited to communicate on health care policies regarding all areas of KT via e-mail and "Google groups." From this communication, and using available evidence, specific recommendations and research questions were developed. At the Consensus Conference, additional comments were incorporated. This report summarizes the results of this collaborative effort and provides a set of recommendations and accompanying research questions to guide development, implementation, and evaluation of health care policies intended to promote KT in emergency medicine. The recommendations are to 1a) involve appropriate stakeholders in the health care policy process; 1b) collaborate with policy makers when health care policy focus areas are being developed; 2) use previously validated clinical practice guideline development tools; 3) address implementation issues during the development of health care policies; 4) monitor outcomes with performance measures appropriate to different practice environments; and 5) plan periodic reviews to uncover new clinical evidence, new methods to improve KT, and new technologies. To advance the further development of these recommendations, a research agenda is proposed.     

Faculty Development: How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Faculty Development Program in Emergency Medicine

Evaluation of the effectiveness of any faculty development program (FDP) is crucial to provide assessment of existing programs and to yield valid recommendations for designing future programs that better address the needs of individual faculty members and the sponsoring institutions. The author chose the validated Kirkpatrick's model with four levels of program outcomes (satisfaction data, learning data, performing data, and career change) to evaluate the effectiveness of an FDP in emergency medicine. Assessment of the effectiveness of this FDP can be performed by sponsoring organizations or by independent evaluators experienced in the field for better objectivity.     

Safety Net Research in Emergency Medicine Proceedings of the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on "The Unraveling Safety Net"

A primary goal of the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "The Unraveling Safety Net: Research Opportunities and Priorities," was to explore a formal research agenda for safety net research in emergency medicine. This paper represents the thoughts of active health services researchers regarding the structure and direction of such work, including some examples from their own research. The current system for safety net care is described, and the emergency department is conceptualized as a window on safety net patients and systems, uniquely positioned to help study and coordinate integrated processes of care.     

Effect of Changes in Graduate Medical Education Funding on Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in graduate medical education (GME) funding have had an impact on emergency medicine (EM) residency training programs. METHODS: A 34-question survey was mailed to the program directors (PDs) of all 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited EM residency programs in the United States in the fall of 1998, requesting information concerning the impact of changes in GME funding on various aspects of the EM training. The results were then compared with a similar unpublished survey conducted in the fall of 1996. RESULTS: One hundred one completed surveys were returned (88% response rate). Seventy-one (70%) of the responding EM residency programs were PGY-I through PGY-III, compared with 55 (61%) of the responding programs in 1996. The number of PGY-II through PGY-IV programs decreased from 25 (28%) of responding programs in 1996 to 17 (16%). The number of PGY-I through PGY-IV programs increased slightly (13 vs 10); the number of EM residency positions remained relatively stable. Fifteen programs projected an increase in their number of training positions in the next two years, while only three predicted a decrease. Of the respondents, 56 programs reported reductions in non-EM residency positions and 35 programs reported elimination of fellowship positions at their institutions. Only four of these were EM fellowships. Forty-six respondents reported a reduction in the number of non-EM residents rotating through their EDs, and of these, 11 programs reported this had a moderate to significant effect on their ability to adequately staff the ED with resident physicians. Sixteen programs limited resident recruitment to only those eligible for the full three years of GME funding. Eighty-seven EM programs reported no change in faculty size due to funding issues. Sixty-two programs reported no change in the total number of hours of faculty coverage in the ED, while 34 programs reported an increase. Three EM programs reported recommendations being made to close their residency programs in the near future. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in GME funding have not caused a decrease in the number of existing EM residency and fellowship training positions, but may have had an impact in other areas, including: an increase in the number of EM programs structured in a PGY-I through PGY-III format (with a corresponding decrease in the number of PGY-II through PGY-IV programs); a decrease in the number of non-EM residents rotating through the ED; restriction of resident applicants who are ineligible for full GME funding from consideration by some EM training programs; and an increase in the total number of faculty clinical hours without an increase in faculty size.     

The Perceived Effectiveness of Total Quality Management as a Tool for Quality Improvement in Emergency Medicine

OBJECTIVES: To describe the perceived effectiveness of using the Total Quality Management (TQM) approach to quality improvement in both academic and nonacademic EDs, and to discuss some important barriers to effectiveness of TQM programs. METHOD: A mail survey of 100 EDs was conducted with telephone follow-up. Hospitals were randomly selected from three subgroups: university teaching hospitals, nonuniversity teaching hospitals, and private nonteaching hospitals. ED physician directors or nonphysician administrators with knowledge of departmental quality improvement initiatives were surveyed. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 60%. Of the respondents, 54 (90.0%) used TQM techniques as part of their quality improvement initiatives. TQM techniques were used more frequently and for a longer duration in academic programs. ED staff participation in TQM projects was relatively low; less than 25% in the majority (79.6%) of all EDs. TQM initiatives were ranked least effective in university settings, of which 11 of 13 (84.6%) rated their TQM programs as ineffective or having no effect. More mature programs (>5 years old) had a significantly higher ranking for effectiveness than those programs less than 2 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Total Quality Management is being utilized in a large number of EDs. TQM initiative is perceived as having little or no positive effect. This is particularly the case in academic EDs.