Reaction time differences in spatially constrained bilateral and unilateral movements

Previous investigations of bilateral-unilateral reaction time (RT) differences have reported equivocal findings. Studies where bilateral RT has been found longer than unilateral RT have often emphasized movement precision, while studies reporting non-significant differences have placed little emphasis on precision. To test the hypothesis that movement precision is an important factor in the bilateral unilateral difference, we investigated the influence of changes in spatial accuracy constraints on RT for unilateral and bilateral movements. Ten self-declared right-handed subjects performed fast and accurate 45 degrees unilateral and bilateral elbow flexion movements to small (1.5 degrees) and large (12.0 degrees) targets. For bilateral movements, spatial accuracy was emphasized for only one arm (the "aiming" arm), while the contralateral ("mirroring") arm performed a simultaneous flexion movement with no emphasis on movement accuracy. We found that while changes in target size had no significant effect on movement latency, changing the hand (right vs left) for which accuracy was emphasized did. When subjects performed right-arm aiming, bilateral movements, unilateral and bilateral RT did not differ significantly. In contrast, when subjects performed left-arm aiming, bilateral movements, RT was significantly longer than for unilateral movements. We conclude that while spatial accuracy per se (i.e., target size) does not differentiate bilateral and unilateral movements, the role of the left hand (i.e., aiming vs mirroring) does. Differences in the hemispheric control of right- and left-hand aiming movements are discussed.     

The organization of patterns of multilimb coordination as revealed through reaction time measures

Simple visual reaction time (RT) during the performance of sagittal movements of the upper and/or lower limbs was investigated. Experiment 1 demonstrated that RTs increased when more limbs were to be moved simultaneously. This effect was more apparent for the upper than for the lower limbs. Experiment 2 allowed a separation of RT into premotor time (PMT) and motor time (MOT) components through analysis of electromyographic activity, and showed that these longer response delays were associated with increased PMTs. This suggests that the time required for the central organization of movements increased as more limbs were to be controlled simultaneously. Compared to single-limb performance conditions, the increases in RT were much larger in the upper limbs (up to 16%) than in the lower limbs (up to 5%) when limb segments were added. During single-limb conditions, RTs in the upper limbs tended to be smaller than in the lower limbs, in accordance with efferent nerve conduction time estimates. Conversely, the lower limb(s) was (were) initiated before the upper limb(s) when both effector types were moved simultaneously. This pattern of activation is reminiscent of the organization of postural control during upright standing, where goal-directed arm activity is preceded by (bilateral) leg activity to anticipate for the upcoming postural destabilization. Finally, hemifield manipulations in experiment 2 revealed faster RTs and PMTs for stimuli presented in the right visual field in comparison with the left field. This advantage was evident for ipsilateral as well as contralateral responses and supports the pre-eminence of the left hemisphere in the complex organization of gross motor responses.     

Both striate cortex and superior colliculus contribute to visual properties of neurons in superior temporal polysensory area of macaque monkey

Although the tectofugal system projects to the primate cerebral cortex by way of the pulvinar, previous studies have failed to find any physiological evidence that the superior colliculus influences visual activity in the cortex. We studied the relative contributions of the tectofugal and geniculostriate systems to the visual properties of neurons in the superior temporal polysensory area (STP) by comparing the effects of unilateral removal of striate cortex, the superior colliculus, or of both structures. In the intact monkey, STP neurons have large, bilateral receptive fields. Complete unilateral removal of striate cortex did not eliminate visual responses of STP neurons in the contralateral visual hemifield; rather, nearly half the cells still responded to visual stimuli in the hemifield contralateral to the lesion. Thus the visual properties of STP neurons are not completely dependent on the geniculostriate system. Unilateral striate lesions did affect the response properties of STP neurons in three ways. Whereas most STP neurons in the intact monkey respond similarly to stimuli in the two visual hemifields, responses to stimuli in the hemifield contralateral to the striate lesion were usually weaker than responses in the ipsilateral hemifield. Whereas the responses of many STP neurons in the intact monkey were selective for the direction of stimulus motion or for stimulus form, responses in the hemifield contralateral to the striate lesion were not selective for either motion or form. Whereas the median receptive field in the intact monkey extended 80 degrees into the contralateral visual field, the receptive fields of cells with responses in the contralateral field that survived the striate lesions had a median border that extended only 50 degrees into the contralateral visual field. Removal of both striate cortex and the superior colliculus in the same hemisphere abolished the responses of STP neurons to visual stimuli in the hemifield contralateral to the combined lesion. Nearly 80% of the cells still responded to visual stimuli in the hemifield ipsilateral to the lesion. Unilateral removal of the superior colliculus alone had only small effects on visual responses in STP. Receptive-field size and visual response strength were slightly reduced in the hemifield contralateral to the collicular lesion. As in the intact monkey, selectivity for stimulus motion or form were similar in the two visual hemifields. We conclude that both striate cortex and the superior colliculus contribute to the visual responses of STP neurons. Striate cortex is crucial for the movement and stimulus specificity of neurons in STP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Globus Pallidus and motor initiation: the bilateral effects of unilateral quisqualic acid-induced lesion on reaction times in monkeys

The results of many experimental studies have shown that the globus pallidus (GP) is involved in the control of motor activities, particularly during motor execution. Whether or not the GP is involved in the initiation phase is still a matter of controversy, however. This question was investigated in the present study in Papio papio monkeys after GP lesion using a simple reaction time (RT) task, focusing particularly on the initiation phase. The monkeys were trained to perform this task, which consisted of raising their hand as quickly as possible in response to a visual signal. The RT and its premotor and motor components were measured. In addition, the distribution of the RTs was analyzed in order to assess the number of long latency responses. After making unilateral GP cell lesions by locally injecting small amounts of the excitatory amino acid quisqualic acid, a bilateral increase was observed in RT. This lengthening involved both the premotor and the motor phases of the RT when the task was performed with the contralateral limb and only the premotor phase when it was performed with the ipsilateral one. A significant increase was observed in the percentage of long latency responses recorded in the contralateral limb after the GP lesion but not in the ipsilateral one. Increases in the RT and in the percentage of long latency responses are thought to constitute two indices of the akinesia observed in our task involving speed constraints, which suggests that the GP may participate in motor initiation. A complete recovery of the RT was observed within one month, whereas the increase in the percentage of long latency responses persisted. These two indices of akinesia seemed therefore to result from an impairment involving both motor and nonmotor processes. These data suggest that the GP may be involved in the control of postural adjustment, motivation, and/or the control of the initial isometric part of movements. The time course of the recovery from the deficits observed after GP lesion shows the existence of mechanisms which seem to have been operative particularly in the case of impairments affecting motor processes.     

Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog--I. Effects of various unilateral lesions

We have studied the effects on frog orienting behavior of three lesions: unilateral optic nerve section, unilateral tectal lobe ablation, and unilateral transverse hemisection of the neuraxis at a level just caudal to the optic tectum. Unilateral optic nerve section and unilateral tectal lobe ablation produce very similar deficits in visually elicited responses to prey items, an absence of responses for stimuli at locations within the monocular field of one eye. Unilateral hemisection, in contrast, results in abnormalities in visually elicited responses over a wider area, encompassing the entire ipsilateral visual hemifield. The hemisection deficit also differs in character from that following optic nerve section or tectal lesion. Within the affected hemifield, frogs do not fail to respond to stimuli but rather respond with abnormally directed movements. The movements, regardless of stimulus eccentricity on the horizontal, are always forwardly directed. While not varying with horizontal eccentricity, the movements do vary with stimulus elevation and distance. The variation with stimulus distance in the affected hemifield is somewhat different from that in the opposite hemifield. We conclude from the behavior that remains after hemisection lesions that there must exist bilateral descending tectofugal paths capable of triggering movements which vary with stimulus elevation and distance, and a crossed descending tectofugal path capable of triggering turns into one visual hemifield. That the deficit area is larger following a hemisection than following tectal lobe ablation indicates that the hemisection has affected the ability of both tectal lobes to trigger turns in one direction. A possible interpretation of this finding is that the lesion has interrupted not only the crossed descending tectofugal path from one tectal lobe but an uncrossed descending tectofugal path from the other. This hypothetical pathway as well as the others mentioned is incorporated in a model of the organization of the post-tectal circuitry involved in orienting.     

Impairments in prehension produced by early postnatal sensory motor cortex activity blockade

This study examined the effects of blocking neural activity in sensory motor cortex during early postnatal development on prehension. We infused muscimol, either unilaterally or bilaterally, into the sensory motor cortex of cats to block activity continuously between postnatal weeks 3-7. After stopping infusion, we trained animals to reach and grasp a cube of meat and tested behavior thereafter. Animals that had not received muscimol infusion (unilateral saline infusion; age-matched) reached for the meat accurately with small end-point errors. They grasped the meat using coordinated digit flexion followed by forearm supination on 82.7% of trials. Performance using either limb did not differ significantly. In animals receiving unilateral muscimol infusion, reaching and grasping using the limb ipsilateral to the infusion were similar to controls. The limb contralateral to infusion showed significant increases in systematic and variable reaching end-point errors, often requiring subsequent corrective movements to contact the meat. Grasping occurred on only 14.8% of trials, replaced on most trials by raking without distal movements. Compensatory adjustments in reach length and angle, to maintain end-point accuracy as movements were started from a more lateral position, were less effective using the contralateral limb than ipsilateral limb. With bilateral inactivations, the form of reaching and grasping impairments was identical to that produced by unilateral inactivation, but the magnitude of the reaching impairments was less. We discuss these results in terms of the differential effects of unilateral and bilateral inactivation on corticospinal tract development. We also investigated the degree to which these prehension impairments after unilateral blockade reflect control by each hemisphere. In animals that had received unilateral blockade between postnatal weeks (PWs) 3 and 7, we silenced on-going activity (after PW 11) during task performance using continuous muscimol infusion. We inactivated the right (previously active) and then the left (previously silenced) sensory motor cortex. Inactivation of the ipsilateral (right) sensory motor cortex produced a further increase in systematic error and less frequent normal grasping. Reinactivation of the contralateral (left) cortex produced larger increases in reaching and grasping impairments than those produced by ipsilateral inactivation. This suggests that the impaired limb receives bilateral sensory motor cortex control but that control by the contralateral (initially silenced) cortex predominates. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that the normal development of skilled motor behavior requires activity in sensory motor cortex during early postnatal life.     

Visuomotor learning generalizes between bilateral and unilateral conditions despite varying degrees of bilateral interference

Bilateral interference, referring to the tendency of movements of one arm to disrupt the intended movements made simultaneously with the other arm, is often observed in a task that involves differential planning of each arm movement during sensorimotor adaptation. In the present study, we examined two questions: 1) how does the compatibility between visuomotor adaptation tasks performed with both arms affect bilateral interference during bimanual performance? and 2) how do variations in bilateral interference affect transfer of visuomotor adaptation between bilateral and unilateral conditions? To examine these questions, we manipulated visuomotor compatibility using two kinematic variables (direction of required hand motion, direction of an imposed visual rotation). Experiment 1 consisted of two conditions in which the direction of visual rotations for both arms was either in the same or opposing directions, whereas the target direction for both arms was always the same. In experiment 2, we examined the pattern of generalization between the bilateral and unilateral conditions when both the target and rotation directions were opposing between the arms. In both experiments, subjects first adapted to a 30° visual rotation with one arm (preunilateral), then with both arms (bilateral), and finally with the arm that was not used in the first session (postunilateral). Our results show that bilateral interference was smallest when both variables were the same between the arms. Our data also show extensive transfer of visuomotor adaptation between bilateral and unilateral conditions, regardless of degree of bilateral interference.     

Reflex response to imposed bilateral hip oscillations in human spinal cord injury

In human spinal cord injury (SCI), imposed unilateral hip movements trigger multijoint, coordinated reflexes that might incorporate interneuronal circuitry involved in normal motor control, such as neural pathways associated with the reflex control of locomotion. To further investigate the complexity of these hip-triggered reflexes, we measured the effects of kinematics of the contralateral hip on this type of spastic reflex activity in 11 chronic SCI subjects. A novel servomotor drive system was constructed to impose bilateral hip oscillations while the knees and ankles were held stationary in instrumented leg braces. Surface electromyograms (EMGs) and joint torques were recorded during the imposed hip oscillations. Tests were conducted at two different frequencies to test for velocity dependence of the reflexes and the following four paradigms were used to examine the effects of contralateral hip afferents on hip-triggered spastic reflexes: 1) bilateral alternating, 2) bilateral synchronous, 3) unilateral leg oscillation with the contralateral leg held stationary in hip extension, and 4) unilateral leg oscillation with the contralateral leg held stationary in hip flexion. The response to bilateral alternating movements resulted in a significantly larger reflex magnitude compared with the bilateral synchronous movements (P < 0.001). Unilateral leg perturbations yielded reflex patterns that were consistent with the reflex patterns observed during alternating and synchronous hip oscillations. These observations suggest that spastic reflex excitability is modulated through afferent input from the contralateral hip in a manner that is generally consistent with locomotion.     

Distribution of eye- and arm-movement-related neuronal activity in the SEF and in the SMA and Pre-SMA of monkeys

We analyzed neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field (SEF), supplementary motor area (SMA), and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) during the performance of three motor tasks: capturing a visual target with a saccade, reaching one arm to a target while gazing at a visual fixation point, or capturing a target with a saccade and arm-reach together. Our data demonstrated that each area was involved in controlling the arm and eye movements in a different manner. Saccade-related neurons were found mainly in the SEF. In contrast, arm-movement-related neurons were found primarily in the SMA and pre-SMA. In addition, we found that the activity of both arm-movement- and saccade-related neurons differed depending on the presence or absence of an accompanying saccade or arm movement. Such context dependency was found in all three areas. We also discovered that activity preceding eye or arm movement alone, and eye and arm movement combined, appeared more often in the pre-SMA and SEF, suggesting their involvement in effector-independent aspects of motor behavior. Subsequent analysis revealed that the laterality of arm representation differed in the three areas: it was predominantly contralateral in the SMA but largely bilateral in the pre-SMA and SEF.     

Rhythmic arm cycling produces a non-specific signal that suppresses Soleus H-reflex amplitude in stationary legs

Rhythmic arm cycling significantly suppresses Hoffmann (H-) reflex amplitude in Soleus muscles of stationary legs. The specific parameters of arm cycling contributing to this suppression, however, are unknown. Between the arms or legs, movement results in suppression of the H-reflex that is specifically related to the phase of movement and the locus of limb movement. We speculated that the effects of arm movement features on H-reflexes in the leg would be similar and hypothesized that the Soleus H-reflex suppression evoked by arm movement would therefore be specifically related to: (1) phase of the movement; (2) the locus of the movement (i.e., ipsilateral or contralateral arm); (3) range of arm motion; and (4) frequency of arm cycling. Participants performed bilateral arm cycling at 1 and 2 Hz with short and long-crank lengths. Ipsilateral and contralateral arm cycling was also performed at 1 Hz with a long-crank length. Soleus H-reflexes were evoked at four equidistant phases and comparisons were made while maintaining similar evoked motor waves and Soleus activation. Our results show that comparable suppressive effects were seen at all phases of the arm movement: there was no phase-dependence. Further, bilateral or unilateral (whether ipsi- or contralateral arm) cycling yielded equivalent suppression of the H-reflex amplitude. Cycling at 2 Hz resulted in a significantly larger suppression than with 1 Hz cycling. We conclude that a general, rather than a specific, signal related to the command to produce rhythmic arm muscle activity mediates the suppression of Soleus H-reflex during arm cycling.     

Bilateral motor tasks involve more brain regions and higher neural activation than unilateral tasks: an fMRI study

Movements that involve simultaneous coordination of muscles of the right and left lower limbs form a large part of our daily activities (e.g., standing, rising from a chair). This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine which brain areas are used to control coordinated lower-limb movements, specifically comparing regions that are activated during bilateral exertions to those performed unilaterally. Plantarflexor exertions were produced at a target force level of 15 % of the participants’ maximum voluntary contraction, in three conditions, with their right (dominant) foot, with their left foot, and with both feet simultaneously. A voxel-wise analysis determined which regions were active in the bilateral, but not in the unilateral conditions. In addition, a region of interest (ROI) approach was used to determine differences in the percent signal change (PSC) between the conditions within motor areas. The voxel-wise analysis showed a large number of regions (cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar) that were active during the bilateral condition, but not during either unilateral condition. The ROI analysis showed several motor regions with higher activation in the bilateral condition than unilateral conditions; further, the magnitude of bilateral PSC was more than the sum of the two unilateral conditions in several of these regions. We postulate that the greater levels of activation during bilateral exertions may arise from interhemispheric inhibition, as well as from the greater need for motor coordination (e.g., synchronizing the two limbs to activate together) and visual processing (e.g., monitoring of two visual stimuli).     

Role of [corrected] nigrostriatal dopamine system in learning to perform sequential motor tasks in a predictive manner.

Neurons in the primate striatum and the substantia nigra pars compacta change their firing patterns during sensory-motor learning. To study the consequences of nigrostriatal dopamine depletion for learning and memory of motor sequences, we used a neurotoxin, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), to deplete dopamine unilaterally in the striatum of macaque monkeys either before or after training them on sequential push-button motor tasks. We compared the monkeys' performance with the arms ipsilateral and contralateral to dopamine depletion. During training and retraining on the tasks, we measured initial and serial movement times and reaction times for the push button movements, electromyographic patterns of arm and orofacial muscle activity during button pushing and reward licking, and saccadic eye movements during the button push sequences. With the arm ipsilateral to the side of dopamine depletion, each monkey showed progressive shortening of movement times and initial and serial reaction times, and each developed consistent strategies of hand-orofacial and hand-eye coordination in which single button push movements were linked efficiently to succeeding movements so that performance of the whole sequence became predictive. These patterns did not develop for contralateral arm performance in this monkey treated with MPTP before training. With the arm contralateral to dopamine depletion, the monkey showed significant quantitative deficits in all parameters measured except initial reaction times. Movement times and serial reaction times were longer than those for the ipsilateral arm; anticipatory saccadic eye movements were not well time-locked to individual button pushes made with the contralateral hand; and push and licking movements were not smoothly coordinated. This monkey further showed striking differences in performance when using the ipsilateral and contralateral arms in switch trial tests in which reward was delivered unexpectedly one button early. He continued to make movements to the previously rewarded button with the ipsilateral arm but showed no such automatic movements when he used his contralateral arm. For the monkey treated with MPTP after training, performance on the push-button task was skilled for both arms before dopamine depletion, but the unilateral dopamine depletion produced deficits in contralateral arm performance for all parameters measured, again excepting initial reaction times. With retraining, however, his performance with the contralateral arm improved. We conclude that the striatum and its nigrostriatal afferents function in the initial learning underlying performance of sequences of movements as single motor programs. The nigrostriatal system also operates during the retrieval of these programs once learning is accomplished, but lesions of the nigrostriatal system spare the ability to relearn the previously acquired programs.     

Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children

When humans perform goal-directed arm movements under the influence of an external damping force, they learn to adapt to these external dynamics. After removal of the external force field, they reveal kinematic aftereffects that are indicative of a neural controller that still compensates the no longer existing force. Such behavior suggests that the adult human nervous system uses a neural representation of inverse arm dynamics to control upper-extremity motion. Central to the notion of an inverse dynamic model (IDM) is that learning generalizes. Consequently, aftereffects should be observable even in untrained workspace regions. Adults have shown such behavior, but the ontogenetic development of this process remains unclear. This study examines the adaptive behavior of children and investigates whether learning a force field in one hemifield of the right arm workspace has an effect on force adaptation in the other hemifield. Thirty children (aged 6-10 years) and ten adults performed 30 degrees elbow flexion movements under two conditions of external damping (negative and null). We found that learning to compensate an external damping force transferred to the opposite hemifield, which indicates that a model of the limb dynamics rather than an association of visited space and experienced force was acquired. Aftereffects were more pronounced in the younger children and readaptation to a null-force condition was prolonged. This finding is consistent with the view that IDMs in children are imprecise neural representations of the actual arm dynamics. It indicates that the acquisition of IDMs is a developmental achievement and that the human motor system is inherently flexible enough to adapt to any novel force within the limits of the organism's biomechanics.     

Bilateral impact of unilateral visual cortex lesions on the superior colliculus

We examined the functional impact of a long-standing, unilateral primary visual cortex lesion on the superior colliculus (SC) using radiolabeled 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) as a marker of neural activity. In accord with known corticotectal connectivity and functional influence, 2DG uptake in the superficial layers of the ipsilesional SC was decreased. We also found a decrease in the superficial layers of the contralesional SC. These data suggest that modifications in activity in one SC can have a substantial influence on activity in its contralateral partner, and that processing in one visual hemifield does not occur independently of processing of signals in the opposite hemifield. The effects are not mediated by the contralateral hemisphere but are probably mediated by intercollicular circuitry.     

Reaction Time in a Visual 4-Choice Reaction Time Task: ERP Effects of Motor Preparation and Hemispheric Involvement

Reaction time (RT), the most common measure of CNS efficiency, shows intra- and inter-individual variability. This may be accounted for by hemispheric specialization, individual neuroanatomy, and transient functional fluctuations between trials. To explore RT on these three levels, ERPs were measured in a visual 4-choice RT task with lateralized stimuli (left lateral, left middle, right middle, and right lateral) in 28 healthy right-handed subjects. We analyzed behavioral data, ERP microstates (MS), N1 and P3 components, and trial-by-trial variance. Across subjects, the N1 component was contralateral to the stimulation side. N1-MSs were stronger over the left hemisphere, and middle stimulation evoked stronger activation than lateral stimulation in both hemispheres. The P3 was larger for the right visual field stimulation. RTs were shorter for the right visual hemifield stimulation/right hand responses. Within subjects, covariance analysis of single trial ERPs with RTs showed consistent lateralized predictors of RT over the motor cortex (MC) in the 112–248 ms interval. Decreased RTs were related to negativity over the MC contralateral to the stimulation side, an effect that could be interpreted as the lateralized readiness potential (LRP), and which was strongest for right side stimulation. The covariance analysis linking individual mean RTs and individual mean ERPs showed a frontal negativity and an occipital positivity correlating with decreased RTs in the 212–232 ms interval. We concluded that a particular RT is a composite measure that depends on the appropriateness of the motor preparation to a particular response and on stimulus lateralization that selectively involves a particular hemisphere.     

Bimanual coordination and perceptual grouping in a patient with motor neglect

Motor neglect refers to the underutilisation of a limb contralateral to a brain lesion in the absence of primary motor and sensory deficits. The related problem of motor extinction refers to a contralesional motor deficit that worsens or only becomes apparent when bilateral actions are required. We present a single case (MM) of a patient with motor neglect who also demonstrates a form of motor extinction that is influenced by visual grouping between stimuli. The comparisons of unimanual and bimanual reach to grasp movements towards one or two objects in Experiment 1 showed that MM made relatively normal unimanual contralesional movements but impaired contralesional movements under bimanual action conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that motor extinction was improved by asking MM to make bimanual movements towards a single object. In Experiment 3, the effects of object coding on bimanual movement were replicated across conditions that varied the distance between end points for the movements. MM did not show overt visual extinction. We suggest that MM demonstrates a late-acting attentional bias that is expressed in terms of competitive motor activity. Normally, the contralesional limb “loses” the competition for action, but this can be modulated by visual grouping between targets.     

Bimanual coordination and perceptual grouping in a patient with motor neglect

Motor neglect refers to the underutilisation of a limb contralateral to a brain lesion in the absence of primary motor and sensory deficits. The related problem of motor extinction refers to a contralesional motor deficit that worsens or only becomes apparent when bilateral actions are required. We present a single case (MM) of a patient with motor neglect who also demonstrates a form of motor extinction that is influenced by visual grouping between stimuli. The comparisons of unimanual and bimanual reach to grasp movements towards one or two objects in Experiment 1 showed that MM made relatively normal unimanual contralesional movements but impaired contralesional movements under bimanual action conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that motor extinction was improved by asking MM to make bimanual movements towards a single object. In Experiment 3, the effects of object coding on bimanual movement were replicated across conditions that varied the distance between end points for the movements. MM did not show overt visual extinction. We suggest that MM demonstrates a late-acting attentional bias that is expressed in terms of competitive motor activity. Normally, the contralesional limb "loses" the competition for action, but this can be modulated by visual grouping between targets.     

Unilateral reaction time task is delayed during contralateral movements

Performing unlearned unimanual tasks when simultaneously carrying out another task with the contralateral hand is known to be difficult. The dual task interference theory predicts that reaction time will be delayed if the investigated task is performed in the course of ongoing contralateral movements. Ballistic movements can be performed at maximal speed in simple reaction time (SRT) experiments when subjects have adequately prepared the motor system needed for movement execution. When fully prepared, activation of subcortical motor pathways by a startling auditory stimulus (SAS) triggers the whole reaction. In this study, we have examined dual task interference with reaction time in eight healthy volunteers. They were presented with a visual imperative signal to perform unilateral SRT either in a baseline condition (control trials) or while carrying out contralateral rhythmic oscillatory movements (test trials). A SAS was introduced in 25% of the trials in both conditions. SRT was significantly delayed in the interference test trial when compared to control trials either with or without SAS (P < 0.001). Control and test trials with SAS were significantly faster than those without SAS in both conditions (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the percentage SRT shortening induced by SAS or in the percentage SRT delay observed in the test trials. Our results suggest that performing rhythmic oscillatory movements with one limb slows SRT in the contralateral limb and that this effect is likely related to motor preparation changes. The effect described here can be of interest for physiological studies of interlimb coordination and the mechanisms underlying the dual task interference phenomenon.     

Hemispheric control of unilateral and bilateral responses to lateralized light stimuli after callosotomy and in callosal agenesis

Normally, simple digital or manual responses to a light stimulus in the right or left visual hemifields are performed faster with uncrossed hand-field combinations than with crossed hand-field combinations. Because of the organization of visual and motor pathways, the integration of uncrossed responses is assumed to occur within a single hemisphere, whereas a time-consuming inter-hemispheric transfer via the corpus callosum is considered to be necessary for the integration of crossed responses. However, callosal transfer may be dispensable for those crossed responses which can be controlled through ipsilaterally descending motor pathways by the hemisphere receiving the visual stimulus. We investigated crossed-uncrossed differences (CUDs) in speed of simple visuomotor responses to lateralized flashes in one subject with total section of the corpus callosum and two subjects with complete callosal agenesis. We recorded the reaction times as well as the premotor times, as indicated by the electromyographic latencies of the prime movers, of three types of responses: a distal response involving a thumb flexion, a proximal response chiefly involving a forearm flexion and an axial response involving a shoulder elevation. Further, the three types of responses to a single lateralised flash were performed both unilaterally and bilaterally. The three acallosal subjects showed CUDs greatly exceeding normal values on distal responses, either unilateral or bilateral, and on unilateral proximal responses. These abnormally long CUDs stood in sharp contrast to the insignificant CUDs exhibited by the same subjects on bilateral proximal responses and on unilateral and bilateral axial responses in agreement with correspondingly insignificant CUDs reported for normal subjects. These results confirm that a callosal contribution is important for the execution of fast distal and unilateral proximal responses to a visual stimulus directed to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the responding hand. By contrast, the other types of crossed responses appear to be efficiently coordinated across the midline without the aid of the corpus callosum. This is in keeping with the hypothesis that they are governed by a bilaterally distributed motor system which is preferentially activated for the execution of symmetrical bilateral movements, employing axial and proximal limb muscles.     

Effects of unilateral frontal eye-field lesions on eye-head coordination in monkey

We studied the effects of unilateral frontal eye-field (FEF) lesions on eye-head coordination in monkeys that were trained to perform a visual search task. Eye and head movements were recorded with the scleral search coil technique using phase angle detection in a homogeneous electromagnetic field. In the visual search task all three animals showed a neglect for stimuli presented in the field contralateral to the lesion. In two animals the neglect disappeared within 2-3 wk. One animal had a lasting deficit. We found that FEF lesions that are restricted to area 8 cause only temporary deficits in eye and head movements. Up to a week after the lesion the animals had a strong preference to direct gaze and head to the side ipsilateral to the lesion. Animals tracked objects in contralateral space with combined eye and head movements, but failed to do this with the eyes alone. It was found that within a few days after the lesion, eye and head movements in the direction of the target were initiated, but they were inadequate and had long latencies. Within 1 wk latencies had regained preoperative values. Parallel with the recovery on the behavioral task, head movements became more prominent than before the lesion. Four weeks after the lesion, peak velocity of the head movement had increased by a factor of two, whereas the duration showed a twofold decrease compared with head movements before the lesion. No effects were seen on the duration and peak velocity of gaze. After the recovery on the behavioral task had stabilized, a relative neglect in the hemifield contralateral to the lesion could still be demonstrated by simultaneously presenting two stimuli in the left and right visual hemifields. The neglect is not due to a sensory deficit, but to a disorder of programming. The recovery from unilateral neglect after a FEF lesion is the result of a different orienting behavior, in which head movements become more important. It is concluded that the FEF plays an important role in the organization and coordination of eye and head movements and that lesions of this area result in subtle but permanent changes in eye-head coordination.