Combined resection of the liver and inferior vena cava for hepatic malignancy

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to review the results of combined resection of the liver and inferior vena cava for hepatic malignancy. The morbidity and mortality along with preliminary survival data are assessed in order to determine the utility of this aggressive approach to otherwise unresectable tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Involvement of the inferior vena cava has traditionally been considered a contraindication to resection for advanced tumors of the liver because the surgical risks are high and the long-term prognosis is poor. Progress in liver surgery allows resection in some cases. METHODS: Twenty-two patients undergoing hepatic resection from 1997 to 2003, that also required resection and reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC), were reviewed. The median age was 49 years (range 2 to 68 years). Resections were carried out for: hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), colorectal metastases (n = 6), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 2), hepatoblastoma (n = 2), and squamous cell carcinoma in 1 patient. Liver resections performed included 13 right trisegmentectomies, 6 right lobectomies extended to include the caudate lobe, and 3 left trisegmentectomies. Complex ex vivo procedures were performed in 2 cases using venovenous bypass while the other 20 cases were performed using varying degrees of vascular isolation. In situ cold perfusion of the liver was used in 1 case. The IVC was reconstructed with ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (n = 14), primarily (n = 6), or with Gore-Tex patches (n = 2). RESULTS: There were 2 perioperative deaths (9%). One cirrhotic patient died of liver failure 3 weeks post operatively and 1 patient with cholangiocarcinoma died of pulmonary hemorrhage secondary to a cavitating pulmonary infection after aspiration pneumonia 6 weeks after resection. Six patients had evidence of postoperative liver failure that resolved with supportive management and 2 patients required temporary dialysis. All vascular reconstructions were patent at last follow-up. With median follow-up of 26 months, 5 patients have died of recurrent malignancy at 44, 40, 32, 26, and 24 months, while an additional patient is alive with disease at 31 months. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 85%, 60%, and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IVC involvement by hepatic malignancy does not necessarily preclude resection. Liver resection with reconstruction of the inferior vena cava can be performed in selected cases. The increased risk associated with the procedure appears to be balanced by the possible benefits, particularly when the lack of alternative curative approaches is considered.     

Resection of the inferior vena cava for hepatic malignancy.

Involvement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) by hepatic tumors, although uncommon, is considered to be unresectable by standard surgical techniques. Recent advances in hepatic surgery have made combined hepatic and vena caval resection possible. The purpose of this study is to describe the surgical techniques and early results of combined resection of the liver and IVC. From 1997 to 2000, 11 patients underwent resection of the IVC along with four to seven liver segments. Resections were carried out for hepatocellular carcinoma (four); colorectal metastases (four); and hepatoblastoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastases, and squamous cell carcinoma in one patient each. Ex vivo procedures were performed twice, and total vascular isolation was used in the nine other cases. The IVC was reconstructed with ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (five), primarily (five), or with Gore-Tex patches (one). There were two early deaths: one from liver failure at 3 weeks and one from sepsis secondary to a perforated segment of small bowel 4 months postresection. One patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor died at 32 months of recurrent tumor and one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma is alive with recurrent tumor at 16 months. The remaining patients are alive and disease free with follow-up ranging from 3 to 40 months without evidence of IVC occlusion. Combined resection of the liver and IVC is a formidable undertaking with substantial surgical risk. However, this aggressive surgical approach offers a chance for cure in patients with tumors involving the IVC that would otherwise have a dismal prognosis.     

Ex vivo and in situ resection of inferior vena cava with hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical techniques and early results of inferior vena cava (IVC) resection in patients with advanced liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Involvement of the IVC by hepatic tumors, although rare, is considered inoperable by standard resection techniques. Concomitant hepatic and IVC resection is required to achieve adequate tumor clearance. METHODS: Between February 1995 and February 1999, 158 patients underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases in the authors' unit. Eight patients, aged 42 to 80 years (mean 62 years), with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer underwent concomitant resection of the IVC and four to six hepatic segments. Resections were carried out under total hepatic vascular exclusion in four patients and ex vivo in four patients. Between 30 degrees and 360 degrees of the retrohepatic IVC was resected and replaced with an autogenous vein patch (n = 1), a ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (n = 2), a Dacron tube graft (n = 1), or a patch (n = 3) or was repaired by primary suturing (n = 1). RESULTS: There were two early deaths from multiple organ failure. One patient survived 30 months after ex vivo resection but died of renal cell carcinoma, and another died with recurrent disease at 9 months. The remaining four patients remained alive 5 to 12 months after surgery, with no hepatic failure or venous obstruction; tumor recurrence was present in two. Nonthrombotic occlusion of the neocava occurred in one patient and was stented successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Although concomitant hepatic and IVC resection is associated with a considerable surgical risk, this aggressive surgical approach offers hope for patients with hepatic tumors involving the IVC, who would otherwise have a dismal prognosis. This procedure can be performed under total hepatic vascular exclusion, with or without venovenous bypass, and by ex vivo bench resection.     

Role for extending hepatic resection using an aggressive approach to liver surgery

BACKGROUND: The definition of what is unresectable in liver surgery is controversial. Problems that many believe render patients unresectable can currently be resected using advanced techniques of liver surgery. This study assesses liver resection in patients who were unresectable with standard liver resection but were potentially resectable using an aggressive approach to liver surgery. STUDY DESIGN: From 1997 to 2007, 830 adult patients undergoing hepatectomy were reviewed. Patients were categorized as having unresectable disease by standard resection if the disease could not be resected without resection of the IVC, hepatic vasculature, or because of tumor extent. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients were initially believed to have unresectable disease but went on to laparotomy. Eighteen patients were unresectable at operation, although 98 patients were resected. Seventy-eight trisectionectomies; 18 lobectomies; 1 mesohepatectomy; and 1 segment 5, 6 resection, combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy, nephrectomy, and colectomy, were performed. Fourteen patients also had pancreatic resections. Vascular reconstructions were performed on the IVC (n = 35), hepatic veins (n = 21), portal vein (n = 34), and hepatic artery (n = 5). Hypothermic perfusion of the liver was used in 12 patients (4 ex vivo, 8 in situ cold perfusion). Patients undergoing resection had 6% mortality with a morbidity of 35%. Median survival was 37 months (95% CI, 34-42 months). Five-year actuarial survival was 32%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with liver tumors considered "unresectable" by standard liver resection should be considered for resection with an aggressive approach to liver surgery. Five-year survival of approximately one-third of patients can be expected.     

Adrenocortical carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava: presentation of a 15-patient series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Involvement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a controversial risk factor for surgical treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). This study aims to assess the outcome of an aggressive surgical policy for ACC extending into the IVC and discuss treatment strategies based on a review of the literature. METHODS: Over a 25-year period, 15 patients were treated for ACC extending into the IVC. The upper limit of the extension was the infrahepatic IVC in 2 patients, retrohepatic IVC in 6, and suprahepatic IVC in 7, including 4 with extension into the right atrium. Seven patients presented with concurrent metastases. The operative technique was thrombectomy (n = 13), partial resection with direct closure (n = 1), and total resection with replacement of the IVC (n = 1). Venous control was achieved by caval clamping alone (n = 4), hepatic vascular exclusion (n = 5), and the use of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass or hypothermic circulatory arrest (n = 6). RESULTS: Two patients died postoperatively. Ten patients died of metastatic complications at 4 to 31 months. Median survival time was 8 months. Three patients were still alive after 24, 25, and 45 months of follow-up, one of whom was reoperated at 17 months for a local recurrence. No evidence of recurrent intravenous involvement was found during follow-up in any patient in whom complete resection was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that surgical treatment can be effective for management of ACC with extension into the IVC. Long-term prognosis is poor owing to delay in diagnosis, frequent associated metastatic disease and lack of effective adjuvant treatment.     

Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The original method of liver transplantation (LT) included recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and the use of extracorporeal venovenous bypass (VVB). Refinements in technique permit transplantation to be done with IVC preservation and without VVB use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and November 2000, 202 consecutive grafts were performed in 188 adults (>/=16 years of age). Twelve patients (6.4%) received two and three retransplants (re-LT). Split grafting was performed 19 times (19 of 202 grafts, 9.4%). Risk factors included United Network of Organ Sharing status I (n=30, 16%), previous right upper abdominal surgery (n=32, 17.1%), caudate lobe encirclement of IVC (n=65, 32.2%), IVC (n=24, 11.9%), and splanchnic venous modification (n=58, 30.9%), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (n=34, 16.8%), giant (>5 kg) liver tumor (n=6, 3%), septic necrosis of the caudate lobe (n=1, 0.5%), and previous cavocaval (n=13, 6.4%) or classical LT (n=5, 2.5%). RESULTS: IVC preservation, avoidance of IVC cross clamping and of VVB use were possible in 98.9%, 93%, and 99.5% of 183 primary LT and in 89.5%, 84.2%, and 89.5% of 19 re-LT. Temporary portocaval shunting was never applied. Perioperative mortality was 1.2%. There was no allotransfusion in 73 (36%) grafts and 45 (22%) patients were immediately extubated. Permanent hepatic vein and caval problems were encountered in three (1.5%) grafts. One patient needed stent placement to treat IVC stenosis. Actual 3- and 12-month patient survival for whole, re-LT, and right-lobe split LT groups were 94.7%, 94.1%, 94.7%, 88.2%, 94.1%, and 89%. Three-month graft survival rates for these groups were 92.6%, 94.7%, and 84.2%. CONCLUSIONS: LT with IVC preservation and without VVB use and portocaval shunting is possible in nearly all primary transplants and in the majority of re-LT.     

下腔静脉重建联合肝叶切除治疗肝癌的初步研究

目的 探讨在全肝血流控制下不采用静脉转流技术行下腔静脉重建的肝叶切除治疗侵犯下腔静脉的肝癌的临床经验和疗效。方法 自2004年8月至2005年7月，对3例胆管细胞性肝癌和2例肝细胞性肝癌合并下腔静脉直接侵犯而无癌栓患者，在全肝血流控制而无静脉转流技术下行解剖性肝叶切除联合下腔静脉重建术（局部切除修复2例、局部切除补片2例、人工血管移植1例）。结果 5例患者手术均成功。平均手术时间345（300～450）min，平均手术失血量1375（1200～1800）ml。累计平均肝门阻断时间、全肝血流阻断时间和下腔静脉阻断时间分别为19min、21．2min、56min。术后发生胸腔积液1例，胆漏1例，腹水1例，均治愈。患者平均住院时间15．5（11～19）d。随访4～15个月，1例术后9个月死于肿瘤复发，4例已存活4、8、10、15个月。结论 在全肝血流控制而无静脉转流技术下行下腔静脉重建联合解剖性肝叶切除治疗直接侵犯下腔静脉的肝癌不仅可安全施行，而且可延长患者生存时间。     

Liver harvesting surgical technique for the treatment of retro-hepatic caval thrombosis concomitant to renal cell carcinoma: perioperative and long-term results in 15 patients without mortality

OBJECTIVE: Radical surgical treatment improves the prognosis of patients affected by Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) thrombosis concomitant to renal carcinoma. However, thrombus extension above the infrahepatic IVC represents a major technical topic for surgeons because of the possible occurrence of uncontrollable haemorrhages and tumor fragmentation. We report the results of an innovative surgical approach to caval thrombosis including the isolation of the IVC from the liver as routinely performed during liver harvesting. In the presence of retro-hepatic IVC thrombosis, this technique improves vascular control and allows to perform a large cavotomy with an en-bloc removal of the thrombus and the tumor. METHODS: From January 1995 through June 2003, 15 patients with renal cancer and caval thrombosis were treated at our Institution. Four, ten and one patients were respectively affected by an infrahepatic (Level I), retro-hepatic (Level II) and atrial (Level III) IVC thrombosis. RESULTS: All patients underwent radical surgical treatment. In presence of Level II caval thrombosis, the patients underwent the above reported surgical technique. Perioperative mortality was absent; major morbidity occurred in one patient (6.7%). The thrombus was radically removed in all cases. After a mean follow-up of 53.9 months (5-100 months) all patients but one are still alive. One patient died 9 months after surgery with multiple bilateral pulmonary metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation of the retro-hepatic IVC is a safe and effective manoeuvre to significantly reduce perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients affected by Level II caval thrombosis concomitant to renal carcinoma.     

Hepatic resection for primary or secondary malignancies with involvement of the inferior vena cava: is this operation safe or hazardous?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated surgical techniques and results of patients with tumors who had undergone liver resection with partial resection and reconstruction of the IVC. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent combined liver and IVC resection and reconstruction at a single institution. We identified 19 patients and two categories of tumors, primary (n = 8) and metastatic (n = 11). In 12 patients, a direct suture of the IVC was performed; in 3 patients a pericardium bovine patch was applied; in another 4 patients the IVC was replaced by PTFEt prosthesis. In nine patients, total hepatic vascular occlusion was required. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 5.9%, related to technical complications and hepatic insufficiency. Postoperative morbidity was 57.9%. Median survival time was 32 months (range 3 to 125 months). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 78.9%, 68%, and 49.1%, respectively. Tumor recurrence appeared in 13 patients and was the main cause of death (55.5%). Among the seven patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, three are still alive at 31, 60, and 125 months after resection. In this group, 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 71.4%, 57.1%, and 38.1%. Among the 11 patients resected for colorectal liver metastases, the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 81.8%, 62.3%, and 51.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection combined with IVC resection and reconstruction is a feasible procedure that can be performed with an acceptable operative risk leading to longterm outcome in selected patients.     

Resection of the inferior vena cava for neoplasms with or without prosthetic replacement: a 14-patient series

OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome of resection of the suprarenal or infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) and possible indications for prosthetic replacement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Involvement of the IVC has long been considered a limiting factor for curative surgery for advanced tumors because the surgical risks are high and the long-term prognosis is poor. Prosthetic replacement of the IVC is controversial. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed a 7-year series of 14 patients who underwent en bloc resection including a circumferential segment of the IVC. The tumor was malignant in 12 patients and benign in 2. The resected segment of the IVC was located above the kidneys in eight patients and below in six. Resection was performed without extracorporeal circulation in all patients. RESULTS: In all but one patient, IVC resection was associated with multivisceral resection, including extended nephrectomy (n = 8), major hepatic resection (n = 3), digestive resection (n = 3), and infrarenal aortic replacement (n = 2). Prosthetic replacement of the IVC was performed in eight patients cases and was more common after resection of a suprarenal (6/8) than an infrarenal segment of the IVC (2/6). One patient died of multiorgan failure. Major complications occurred in 29% of patients. Symptomatic complications of prosthetic replacement occurred in one patient (acute postoperative thrombosis, successfully treated by surgical disobstruction). Graft-related infection was not observed. Marked symptoms of venous obstruction developed in three of the six patients who did not undergo venous replacement. In patients undergoing surgery for malignant disease, the estimated median survival was 37 months and the actuarial survival rate was 67% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Multivisceral resection including a segment of IVC is justified to achieve complete extirpation in selected patients with extensive abdominal tumors. Prosthetic replacement of the IVC may be required, particularly in cases of suprarenal resection. It is a safe procedure with a low complication rate and good functional results.     

Inferior vena caval resection with autogenous peritoneo-fascial patch graft caval repair: a new technique.

BACKGROUND: In the course of oncological surgery, resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) may be required to obtain an adequate resection margin and to offer the best opportunity of cure. The remaining defect in the IVC may be managed by: (i) primary repair which may lead to subsequent narrowing of the lumen, possibly leading to turbulent flow and thrombus formation; (ii) patch grafting of the defect, which may prevent narrowing. Several synthetic and biosynthetic materials are available as patch grafts and autologous pericardium has also been used. METHODS: The harvesting and use of the autogenous peritoneo-fascial (APF) graft as an alternative caval patch graft material in the management of defects in the caval wall is proposed. Autogenous peritoneo-fascial caval patch graft repair in six patients was undertaken. RESULTS: One patient with leiomyosarcoma secondaries in the liver eventually succumbed to the disease. The other five patients are clinically well with no evidence of IVC obstruction or venous aneurysms. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results show that this new technique of utilizing an APF patch graft for caval repair is clinically a suitable alternative to current biosynthetic and synthetic materials and may in fact be superior in many aspects.     

Resection and reconstruction of the inferior vena cava for major hepatic resection]

The inferior vena cava (IVC) is partially or segmentally resected in major hepatic resection for malignant hepatic tumors in case of possible direct invasion to the IVC wall or IVC tumor thrombosis. The reconstruction methods of the IVC are divided into three categories depending on the degree of IVC resection: simple suture; patch repair; and segmental replacement. In segmental replacement, a synthetic material such as a cylindrical expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts is widely utilized as a substitute. The total hepatic vascular exclusion technique is usually necessary in concomitant resection of the suprahepatic IVC. When a longer duration of hepatic vascular exclusion is required to resect and reconstruct the suprahepatic IVC and hepatic vein confluence, in situ hypothermic perfusion, the ante situm technique, or ex vivo bench surgery must be applied. When an ePTFE graft is replaced in the resected IVC, a Carrel patch of the IVC is used for the hepatic vein orifice to maintain anastomotic patency. Alternatively, the hepatic vein can be reanastomosed to an inferior vena caval segment transpositioned from the intact infrahepatic IVC portion by replacing the resected infrahepatic IVC with an ePTFE graft.     

Resection and reconstruction of the inferior vena cava for neoplasms

AIM: To evaluate the results of an aggressive surgical approach of resection and reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC). METHODS: The approach to caval resection depends on the extent and location of tumor involvement. The supraand infra-hepatic portion of the IVC was dissected and taped. Left and right renal veins were also taped to control the bleeding. In 12 of the cases with partial tangential resection of the IVC, the flow was reduced to less than 40% so that the vein was primarily closed with a running suture. In 3 of the cases, the lumen of the vein was significantly reduced, requiring the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch. In 2 of the cases with segmental resection of the IVC, a PTFE prosthesis was used and in 1 case, the IVC was resected without reconstruction due to shunting the blood through the azygos and hemiazygos veins. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 266 min (230-310 min) with an average intraoperative blood loss of 300 mL (200-2000 mL). The patients stayed in intensive care unit for 1.8 d (1-3 d). Mean hospital stay was 9 d (7-15 d). Twelve patients (66.7%) had no complications and 6 patients (33.3%) had the following complications: acute bleeding in 2 patients; bile leak in 2 patients; intra abdominal abscess in 1 patient; pulmonary embolism in 2 patients; and partial thrombosis of the patch in 1 patient. General complications such as pneumonia, pleural effusion and cardiac arrest were observed in the same group of patients. In all but 1 case, the complications were transient and successfully controlled. The mortality rate was 11.1% (n = 2). One patient died due to cardiac arrest and pulmonary embolism in the operation room and the second one died 2 d after surgery due to coagulopathy. With a median follow-up of 24 mo, 5 (27.8%) patients died of tumor recurrence and 11 (61.1%) are still alive, but three of them have a recurrence on computed tomography. CONCLUSION: There are a variety of options for reconstruction after resection of the IVC that offers a higher resectable rate and better prognosis in selected cases.     

Hemodynamic effect of the prone position during anesthesia

We studied 21 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery under halothane anesthesia on a convex saddle frame, in order to determine the hemodynamic effect of the prone position. A thermodilution pulmonary arterial catheter was placed in 14 patients (Group PA-1: n = 8; and Group PA-2: n = 6), and an inferior vena caval catheter in the remaining seven patients (Group IVC). Group PA-1 and Group IVC patients were placed in the prone position on a convex saddle frame. In the prone position, the cardiac index (CI) decreased significantly from 3.1 +/- 0.5 to 2.5 +/- 0.3 (l.min-1.m-2, mean +/- s.d., P less than 0.01) without accompanying significant changes in the other hemodynamic variables in Group PA-1. The postural change in Group IVC did not exert a significant effect on the inferior vena caval pressure. Group PA-2 were initially placed in the flat prone position on a flat saddle frame, which produced no significant changes in the hemodynamic variables. Then the convex curvature of the frame was adjusted to the grade appropriate for surgery, which produced a significant reduction in CI (from 2.9 +/- 0.3 to 2.4 +/- 0.4, P less than 0.05). We conclude that the prone position itself may not interfere with the circulatory function. The prone position using a convex saddle frame causes significant reductions in CI, but little change in the other hemodynamic variables.     

Surgical strategy for treating renal cell carcinoma with thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava

OBJECTIVE: A surgical strategy for treating malignant renal tumors with thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) was assessed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records for all patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC; n=30) or Wilms tumor (n=1) with tumor thrombus extending into the IVC who underwent surgical intervention at our institution between January 1980 and December 2001. Tumors were classified preoperatively according to the cephalad extension of thrombus, and intraoperative procedures were selected on the basis of degree of extension. Patients with RCC underwent radical nephrectomy and removal of thrombus with (n=11) or without (n=19) IVC resection. Partial normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass without cardiac arrest was used in 4 patients. The Pringle maneuver was performed in 8 patients. Infrarenal abdominal aortic cross-clamping was used in 8 patients to maintain systemic blood pressure. IVC cross-clamping and the Pringle maneuver were performed in 5 patients with suprahepatic thrombus extension. Temporary placement of a filter in the IVC or plication of the IVC above the hepatic vein was performed before hepatic mobilization, to decrease the risk for pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: One patient died intraoperatively of pulmonary embolism. Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients; all resolved with conservative therapy. The postoperative duration of survival in patients with RCC was 37 +/- 44 months (range, 4-180 months); the 5-year survival rate was 42%. CONCLUSION: Aortic cross-clamping during IVC occlusion prevented hypotension and maintained hemodynamic stability that has required bypass in other series. This surgical treatment with the less extensive approach could result in long-term survival of patients with RCC in whom tumor thrombus extends into the IVC. We recommend that radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy, with or without caval resection, be performed in these patients, with less invasive additional maneuvers.     

Diagnosis and Treatment of Inferior Vena Caval Invasion by Hepatic Cancer

Hepatectomy with concomitant resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has become common for hepatic malignancies involving the IVC. However, diagnosing IVC invasion and the procedure of choice have yet to be standardized. Medical records of nine patients with liver cancer (five metastatic tumors from colorectal cancer and four intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas) believed to have directly invaded the IVC wall were retrospectively abstracted for data on preoperative radiologic studies, surgical procedures, histology of the resected specimen, and treatment outcome. All nine patients underwent hepatectomy: Five did not undergo IVC resection because the IVC could be isolated from the tumor; the remaining four underwent combined IVC resection (wedge and segmental resections in two each). The segmentally resected IVC was reconstructed using an external iliac vein graft. Total hepatic vascular exclusion, venovenous bypass, and the ex vivo technique were not used. Interestingly, the tumor was smaller and the percentage of the IVC circumference in contact with tumor as seen on computed tomography (CT) was less in patients with IVC invasion than in those without it (40 ± 11 vs. 134 ± 61 mm, p < 0.05; 30% ± 8% vs. 60% ± 20%, p < 0.05). The length of the IVC compressed by tumor on cavography was similar in the two patient groups (47 ± 9 vs. 55 ± 8 mm). All patients were discharged from the hospital in good condition: Seven died of cancer recurrence, and the remaining two are currently alive and disease-free 15 and 73 months after surgery, respectively. In conclusion, imaging modalities demonstrating caval deformation, such as CT and cavography, are unreliable for diagnosing direct invasion of the IVC wall. Even when IVC invasion is strongly suggested by conventional radiologic studies, the surgeon should endeavor to peel the tumor from the IVC. This strategy is important to avoid unnecessary resection of the IVC, use of a prosthetic graft, or ex vivo hepatectomy.     

INFERIOR VENA CAVAL RESECTION WITH AUTOGENOUS PERITONEO-FASCIAL PATCH GRAFT CAVAL REPAIR: A NEW TECHNIQUE

Background : In the course of oncological surgery, resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) may be required to obtain an adequate resection margin and to offer the best opportunity of cure. The remaining defect in the IVC may be managed by: (i) primary repair which may lead to subsequent narrowing of the lumen, possibly leading to turbulent flow and thrombus formation; (ii) patch grafting of the defect, which may prevent narrowing. Several synthetic and biosynthetic materials are available as patch grafts and autologous pericardium has also been used. Methods : The harvesting and use of the autogenous peritoneo-fascial (APF) graft as an alternative caval patch graft material in the management of defects in the caval wall is proposed. Autogenous peritoneo-fascial caval patch graft repair in six patients was undertaken. Results : One patient with leiomyosarcoma secondaries in the liver eventually succumbed to the disease. The other five patients are clinically well with no evidence of IVC obstruction or venous aneurysms. Conclusion : Preliminary results show that this new technique of utilizing an APF patch graft for caval repair is clinically a suitable alternative to current biosynthetic and synthetic materials and may in fact be superior in many aspects.     

Liver resection without total vascular exclusion: hazardous or beneficial? An analysis of our experience

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the safety and radicality of liver resection performed without total vascular exclusion (TVE). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: TVE is recommended for safe liver surgery, at least in the case of resection of the paracaval portion of the liver. However, it has some drawbacks because of its invasiveness. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated 329 of 471 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection from October 1994 to October 1999. All of these patients had tumors involving segments 1, 7, or 8 or the cranial portion of segment 4, or underwent major hepatectomies that required exposure of the inferior vena cava (IVC), the main trunks of the hepatic veins, or both. Sixty-four patients underwent resection that included segment 1, with or without the reconstruction of the IVC, the hepatic vein, or both. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-four of 329 procedures were done under intermittent warm ischemia; no clamping methods were used in 6. TVE was never needed. There were no postoperative 30-day deaths. The complication rate was 25.5%, and only 2.1% had major complications. Only 13 (3.9%) patients required whole blood transfusion. Part of the wall of the IVC was resected in six patients, and the hepatic veins were reconstructed in four. Surgical clearance was achieved in all patients undergoing surgery for a tumor. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that liver surgery performed without TVE is safe and effective even in aggressive procedures for liver tumors involving the cavohepatic junction. Therefore, TVE should be further restricted to exceptional patients.     

Is combined partial hepatectomy with segmental resection of inferior vena cava justified for malignancy?

HYPOTHESIS: En bloc partial hepatectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) resection may be the only curative strategy for patients with hepatic malignancies involving the IVC. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients undergoing combined partial hepatectomy with segmental IVC resection and reconstruction between 1990 and 2002. Patients with tangential excision of the IVC were excluded. Follow-up was completed by outpatient clinic visits and mail correspondence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative outcomes; overall and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (7 men and 12 women) underwent partial hepatectomy and segmental IVC resection and reconstruction. Median age was 59 years (range, 24-74 years). Diagnoses consisted of cholangiocarcinoma (9 patients), metastatic tumor (5 patients), sarcoma (3 patients), and hepatocellular carcinoma (2 patients). Major hepatectomies (>/=3 segments) were performed in 15 patients; the caudate lobe was resected in 13. Hepatic vascular isolation was used in 13 patients. Ringed polytef grafts were used for IVC reconstruction in all but 1 patient. Transfusion was necessary in 18 patients (median requirement, 5 U). Median operative time was 6.3 hours (range, 3.7-9.0 hours), and hospitalization was 10.5 days (range, 6-41 days). Negative margins of resection were achieved in 16 patients. Complications occurred in 8 patients (42%), including 1 perioperative death (5%). There was evidence of mural thrombosis of the graft in 2 patients (both nonocclusive); warfarin sodium was used postoperatively in 14. Late graft thrombosis was evident in 2 patients. Median overall survival was 38 months (5-year survival, 21%), and recurrence-free survival was 11.5 months (5-year survival, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large tumors involving both the liver and the IVC are candidates for partial hepatectomy and segmental IVC resection. Resection affords the possibility of negative margins, acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality, long-term graft patency, and prolonged survival.     

Laparoscopic liver resection assisted with radiofrequency

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency-assisted laparoscopic liver resection is reported. METHODS: Patients suitable for liver resection were carefully assessed for laparoscopic resection. Patient and intraoperative and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection. All operations were performed without vascular clamping and consisting of tumorectomy (n = 9), multiple tumoretcomies (n = 2), segmentectomy (n = 2), and bisegmentectomies (n = 2). Mean blood loss was 121 +/- 68 mL, and mean resection was time 167 +/- 45 minutes. There was no need for perioperative or postoperative transfusion of blood or blood products. One patient developed pneumothorax during surgery as a result of direct puncture of pleura with the radiofrequency probe, and 1 patient had transient liver failure and required supportive care after surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.0 +/-1.5 days. At follow-up, those with liver cancer had no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency-assist laparoscopic liver resection can decrease the risk of intraoperative bleeding and blood transfusion.