Comparing interferon‐free with interferon‐based regimens in HCV patients: Rogers phenomenon and Simpson’s paradox

Comparisons of time‐to‐event clinical outcomes between patients with or without a sustained virological response (SVR) after treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection have been repeatedly reported in emphasizing the potential clinical impact of treatment. Combining recently published data from different therapeutic eras with simple examples, we show that comparisons of incidence rates by SVR status between patients treated with interferon‐based and interferon‐free regimens are flawed through confounding by prognosis. The relevant analysis for evaluating and comparing the clinical impact of these regimens should be a comparison between randomized treatment groups, irrespective of the SVR status.     

Real‐world effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in 573 direct‐acting antiviral experienced hepatitis C patients

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) provides a needed hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral option for direct‐acting antiviral (DAA)‐experienced patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks in DAA‐experienced patients with genotype 1‐4 treated in clinical practice. In this observational cohort analysis from the Veterans Affairs’ Clinical Case Registry, 573 DAA‐experienced patients initiating SOF/VEL/VOX were included: 490 genotype 1, 20 genotype 2, 51 genotype 3 and 12 genotype 4. Rates of cirrhosis were 32.7%, 30.0%, 49.0% and 58.3%; rates of prior NS5A‐experience were 100.0%, 95.0%, 90.2% and 100.0% for genotypes 1‐4, respectively. Overall SVR rates were 90.7% (429/473), 90.0% (18/20), 91.3% (42/46) and 100.0% (12/12) for genotypes 1‐4, respectively, and were 91.3% (274/300), 88.9% (16/18), 90.2% (37/41) and 100.0% (11/11) for those with prior NS5A + NS5B experience. For genotype 1, SVR rates were similar in patients with prior regimens of ledipasvir/SOF (90.6%, 298/329), elbasvir/grazoprevir (91.2%, 73/80) and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir (90.9%, 70/77). SVR rates in genotype 1, 2 and 3 patients with prior SOF/VEL experience were 78.9% (15/19), 86.7% (13/15) and 84.6% (11/13). In genotype 1‐4 patients completing 12 weeks of SOF/VEL/VOX, overall SVR rates were 95.1% (409/430), 89.5% (17/19), 93.3% (42/45) and 100% (12/12). In this diverse real‐world cohort of heavily NS5A pretreated patients, SOF/VEL/VOX SVR rates in DAA‐experienced patients were high across all genotypes. Genotype 1 patients who had prior experience with the most commonly prescribed NS5A regimens achieved similarly high SVR rates when retreated with SOF/VEL/VOX. For genotypes 1, 2 and 3, patients with prior SOF/VEL experience had lower SVR rates.     

Real‐world effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for mixed genotype hepatitis C infection: A multicenter pooled analysis in Taiwan

Data on direct‐acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment for mixed genotype hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are scant. This study examined the effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for mixed HCV genotype infection in a real‐world setting in Taiwan. We analysed the data from all patients with mixed HCV genotype infections treated with GLE/PIB or LDV/SOF from 2017 to 2019 in three Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Taiwan. The primary treatment outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment cessation (SVR12). Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. A total of 5190 HCV patients received DAA treatment during this time period. Among them, 116 patients (2.2%) had mixed infections of any 2 or 3 genotypes of 1a, 1b, 2, 3 and 6. Fifty‐four patients received GLE/PIB and 62 received LDV/SOF. SVR12 rates for LDV/SOF vs GLE/PIB therapy were 96.6% (56/58) vs 100% (51/51) by the per‐protocol analysis and 90.3% (56/62) vs 94.4% (51/54) by the evaluable population analysis. Two patients with 1b + 6 and 1b + 2 genotype infections in the LDV/SOF group had relapse. Evaluating the GLE/PIB vs LDV/SOF groups for the most common AEs revealed pruritus (16.7% vs 4.8%), abdominal discomfort (5.6% vs 8%) and fatigue (5.6% vs 4.8%). One patient with AE‐related treatment discontinuation presented with liver decompensation after 4‐week GLE/PIB therapy. DAA‐related significant laboratory abnormalities occurred in two patients with >3× elevated bilirubin level in the GLE/PIB group. GLE/PIB and LDV/SOF are well tolerated and achieve high SVR12 rates for patients with mixed HCV genotype infection.     

Long‐term safety and efficacy results in hepatitis C virus genotype 1‒infected patients receiving ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin in the TOPAZ‐I and TOPAZ‐II trials

The 3‐DAA regimen consisting of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) has shown high sustained virologic response rates (~95%) in phase 3 clinical trials including >2300 HCV genotype 1–infected patients. Real‐world evidence studies have confirmed the effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and are consistent with clinical trial results. TOPAZ‐I and TOPAZ‐II are ongoing phase 3b trials, assessing safety, efficacy and long‐term progression of liver disease and clinical outcomes for up to 5 years post‐treatment in patients treated with OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV. High rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were achieved regardless of presence or absence of cirrhosis.In this report, we assessed the long‐term progression of liver disease and incidence of clinical outcomes up to 3 years of post‐treatment follow‐up in patients with chronic HCV GT1 infection who were treated with (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) ± RBV in the TOPAZ‐I and TOPAZ‐II studies. Improvements were observed in liver disease markers including FIB‐4, METAVIR and Child‐Pugh scores as well as platelet counts. Clinical outcomes related to long‐term progression of liver disease such as liver decompensation were infrequent (<1%). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurred in 1.4% of cirrhotic patients.     

Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for eight or 12 weeks in treatment‐naïve and treatment‐experienced hepatitis C virus genotype 4 patients with or without cirrhosis

The OSIRIS study investigated efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for eight or 12 weeks in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4‐infected patients with METAVIR F0‐F4 fibrosis. Sixty‐three patients (33 treatment‐naïve and 30 peg‐interferon/ribavirin (Peg‐IFN/RBV)‐experienced) enrolled in a partly randomized, open‐label, multicentre, phase IIa study. Patients with F0‐F3 fibrosis were randomized (1:1) into two groups (A1 and A2), stratified according to treatment experience and METAVIR score, to receive either eight weeks (Group A1, n=20) or 12 weeks (Group A2, n=20) of treatment. Patients with compensated cirrhosis (METAVIR F4) received 12 weeks of treatment (Group B, n=23). Treatment comprised simeprevir 150 mg and sofosbuvir 400 mg daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after planned end of treatment (SVR12). Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout. Overall, 92% (95% CI: 82‐97) of patients achieved SVR12; 75% (15/20) in Group A1 and 100% in groups A2 and B. Patients who did not achieve SVR12 (n=5) experienced viral relapse during the first 32 days following treatment and were all prior Peg‐IFN/RBV null responders. The most commonly reported treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asymptomatic lipase increase (14%), pruritus (14%), headache (13%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (11%). No patients discontinued due to TEAEs. In conclusion, simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for 12 weeks achieved a 100% SVR rate in HCV genotype 4‐infected patients with or without compensated cirrhosis (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02278419). The AE and laboratory profile were favourable and consistent with previous data for simeprevir plus sofosbuvir in eight‐ and 12‐week regimens.     

Long‐term follow‐up of clinical trial patients treated for chronic HCV infection with daclatasvir‐based regimens

Background & Aims

Daclatasvir has achieved high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in diverse hepatitis C virus (HCV) populations. This study evaluated the long‐term efficacy and safety of daclatasvir‐based regimens administered during clinical studies.

Methods

Patients enrolled within 6 months of parent study completion or protocol availability at the study sites. The primary objective was durability of SVR at follow‐up Week 12 (SVR12). Secondary objectives included analysing HCV sequences in non‐responders or responders who relapsed, and characterization of liver disease progression.

Results

Between 24 February 2012 and 17 July 2015, this study enrolled and began following 1503 recipients of daclatasvir‐based regimens (follow‐up cut‐off, 13 October 2015); 60% were male, 18% aged ≥65 years, 87% had genotype‐1a (42%) or ‐1b (45%) infection, and 18% had cirrhosis. Median follow‐up from parent study follow‐up Week 12 was 111 (range, 11‐246) weeks. 1329/1489 evaluable patients were SVR12 responders; 1316/1329 maintained SVR until their latest visit. Twelve responders relapsed by (n = 9) or after (n = 3) parent study follow‐up Week 24; one was reinfected. Relapse occurred in 3/842 (0.4%) and 9/487 (2%) responders treated with interferon‐free or interferon‐containing regimens, respectively. Hepatic disease progression and new hepatocellular carcinoma were diagnosed in 15 and 23 patients, respectively. Among non‐responders, emergent non‐structural protein‐5A (NS5A) and ‐3 (NS3) substitutions were replaced by wild‐type sequences in 27/157 (17%) and 35/47 (74%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions

SVR12 was durable in 99% of recipients of daclatasvir‐based regimens. Hepatic disease progression and new hepatocellular carcinoma were infrequent. Emergent NS5A substitutions persisted longer than NS3 substitutions among non‐responders.     

不同直接抗病毒药物方案对基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎及代偿期丙型肝炎肝硬化临床结局的影响

目的探讨不同直接抗病毒药物(DAAs)对基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)及丙型肝炎代偿期肝硬化(CLC)临床结局的影响。方法以2018年1月-2018年12月就诊于山西医科大学第一医院感染科门诊的115例基因型1b型CHC(n=91)及CLC(n=24)患者为研究对象。所有患者根据病情均采用DAAs抗病毒治疗,CHC患者中28例采用索磷布韦联合维帕他韦方案,21例采用艾尔巴韦格拉瑞韦片方案,16例采用奥比帕利联合达塞布韦方案,13例采用索磷布韦联合达拉他韦方案,13例采用索磷布韦联合利巴韦林方案;CLC患者中15例采用索磷布韦联合维帕他韦方案,4例采用艾尔巴韦格拉瑞韦片方案,5例采用索磷布韦联合达拉他韦方案。分析2组患者的肝功能复常率及病毒学应答率,并观察药物的不良反应。计量资料组间比较采用t检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ^2检验。结果90.4%的患者在治疗1周时获得超快速病毒学应答,98.2%的患者在治疗4周时获得快速病毒学应答,100%的患者在治疗12周时获得完全早期病毒学应答,100%的患者在治疗结束后12周获得持续病毒学应答;不同抗病毒治疗方案在治疗1周、4周时HCV RNA阴转率差异均无统计学意义(χ^2值分别为2.83、0.07,P值均>0.05)。不同抗病毒方案均可明显改善患者肝功能(ALT和AST复常率),不同组间疗效差异均无统计学意义(χ^2值分别为0.83、1.23,P值均>0.05)。DAAs治疗12周后,2组患者肾功能指标与治疗前相比未见有明显升高或降低,差异均无统计学意义(t值分别为1.32、0.56,P值均>0.05)。不良事件的发生率较低,恶心2例(1.74%),头晕、心悸、皮疹、溶血各1例(0.87%)。结论根据病情采用相应DAAs抗病毒方案治疗1b型患者,均可取得较好的病毒学应答率,肝功能改善显著、不良事件的发生率低。     

Grazoprevir plus peginterferon and ribavirin in treatment‐naive patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: a randomized trial

Grazoprevir (MK‐5172, Merck & Co., Inc.) is a selective inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4a protease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of grazoprevir at doses of 25–100 mg/day in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin (PEG‐IFN/RBV). In this randomized, dose‐ranging, multicentre trial, treatment‐naive adults with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection received once‐daily grazoprevir 25 mg, 50 mg or 100 mg plus PEG‐IFN/RBV for 12 weeks. Patients with quantifiable HCV RNA (≥25 IU/mL) at week 4 received an additional 12 weeks of PEG‐IFN/RBV. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL 12 weeks after completing therapy [SVR12]). Eighty‐seven patients were randomly assigned and received ≥1 dose of therapy. Median time to undetectable HCV RNA was 16 days in the 100‐mg arm and 22 days in the 25‐ and 50‐mg arms. All patients except one had HCV RNA undetectable or unquantifiable at week 4 and received 12 weeks of therapy. SVR12 was achieved by 13 of 24 (54.2%), 21 of 25 (84.0%) and 23 of 26 (88.5%) patients in the 25‐, 50‐ and 100‐mg arms, respectively (per‐protocol analysis). Three patients discontinued as a result of nonserious adverse events (AEs) and three patients experienced serious AEs. Transaminase elevations occurred in two patients (one each in the 25‐ and 100‐mg arms). Conclusion: These data support further study of the grazoprevir 100‐mg dose. Phase 3 studies of grazoprevir 100 mg in combination with elbasvir are currently ongoing (NCT01710501; protocol P038).     

Eradication of hepatitis C virus profoundly prolongs survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization

Adjuvant pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment (PegIFN/RBV) reduces recurrence and prolongs survival in early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection receiving resection or ablation. However, the impact of antiviral therapy in intermediate and advanced stage of CHC‐HCC patients is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact PegIFN/RBV treatment on recurrence‐free interval and survival in patients with HCC receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). From 2010 to 2013, 274 CHC patients from a 1073 patient‐based cohort composed of freshly diagnosed HCC and receiving TACE treatment the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center were recruited. Propensity score matching (PSM) (age, gender, AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), tumour size, tumour number and Child‐Turcotte‐Pugh score) with the ratio 1:2 for patients with and without PegIFN/RBV treatment was performed. Statistics were performed with SPSS V.20 (IBM, USA). After matching, 153 patients were analysed and 27 patients (17.6%) achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). The 2‐year cumulative overall survival rate and recurrence‐free survival rate among patients with SVR, non‐SVR, and untreated were 85.2% vs 58.3% vs 69.6% (P=.001) and 73.3% vs 53.8% vs 58.5% (P=.013). By Cox regression analysis, non‐SVR, untreated, increase CTP score and nonresponder to TACE were independent factors related to mortality. The SVR achieved by PegIFN/RBV treatment markedly improves survival and reduces tumour recurrence in CHC‐HCC patients receiving TACE treatment after complete response.     

Effect of baseline resistance‐associated substitutions on the efficiency of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in chronic hepatitis C subjects: A meta‐analysis

The effect of baseline resistance‐associated substitutions on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects has drawn considerable attention. However, it has been reported that the relationship between such substitutions and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects is variable in different treatments. This meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship in subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was done, and 17 studies were identified with 6501 chronic hepatitis C subjects. They were reporting relationships between baseline resistance‐associated substitutions and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to evaluate the prognostic role of baseline resistance‐associated substitutions on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed‐effect model. Lower sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post‐treatment in chronic hepatitis C subjects was significantly related to baseline resistance‐associated substitutions in overall genotypes (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.15‐0.61, P < .001), baseline NS5a resistance‐associated substitutions in genotype‐1 (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04‐0.57, P = .005), baseline resistance‐associated substitutions in genotype‐3 (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05‐0.38, P < .001), and baseline NS5a resistance‐associated substitutions in genotype‐3 (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09‐0.49, P < .001). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects was not significantly related to the baseline NS5a resistance‐associated substitutions (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.17‐2.22, P = .45), and baseline resistance‐associated substitutions in genotype‐1 (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12‐1.088, P = .07). In conclusion, the impact of baseline resistance‐associated substitutions on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir may have a great prognostic effect, especially in genotype‐3 as a tool to improve treatment prediction. Chronic hepatitis C subjects with baseline resistance‐associated substitutions may have an independent risk relationship with poor treatment outcomes. This relationship forces us to recommend testing prior to treatment selection to avoid any possible treatment failure.