Prognostic Value of Breast Cancer Subtypes,Ki‐67 Proliferation Index,Age, and Pathologic Tumor Characteristics on Breast Cancer Survival in Caucasian Women

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status are well‐established prognostic markers in breast cancer management. The triple negative breast carcinoma subtype (ER‐/PR‐/HER2‐) has been associated with worse overall prognosis in comparison with other subtypes in study populations consisting of ethnic minorities and young women. We evaluated the prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes, Ki‐67 proliferation index (Ki‐67PI), and pathologic tumor characteristics on breast cancer survival in Caucasian women in our institution, where greater than 90% of the total patient population is white. From 628 new invasive breast cancer cases in our data base (2000‐late 2004), 593 (94%) were identified in Caucasian women. ER/PR/HER2 breast cancer subtypes were classified based on St. Gallen International Expert Consensus recommendations from 2011. ER/PR/HER2 status and its effect on survival were analyzed using a Kaplan–Meier curve. ER/PR/HER2 status, grade, tumor‐node‐metastasis status (TNM)/anatomic stage, and age were analyzed in terms of survival in a multivariate fashion using a Cox regression. Ki‐67PI was analyzed between ER/PR/HER2 groups using the Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U‐tests, and 2 × 5 ANOVA. Our results showed that patients with stage IIB through stage IV breast carcinomas were 2.1–16 times more likely to die than patients with stages IA‐B and IIA disease, respectively (95% CI 1.17–3.81 through 9.68–28.03, respectively), irrespective of ER/PR/HER2 subtype. Similar effect was seen with T2, N2/N3, or M1 tumors in comparison with T1, N0/N1, and M0 tumors. Chances of dying increase approximately 5% for every year increase in age. There was a significant main effect of Ki‐67PI between ER/PR/HER2 subtypes, p < .001, but Ki‐67PI could not predict survival. In summary, TNM status/anatomic stage of breast carcinomas and age are predictive of survival in our patient population of Caucasian women, but breast carcinoma subtypes and Ki‐67 proliferation index are not.     

Molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women: age-specific prevalence and survival

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is currently regarded as a heterogeneous disease classified into various molecular subtypes using gene expression analysis. These molecular subtypes include: basal cell-like, Her-2/neu, luminal A, and luminal B. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence and clinicopathologic associations for molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of all African-American women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1998 to 2005, who had assessable data for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu status. Molecular subtype classification was done based on immunohistochemical surrogates for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu status obtained from Howard University tumor registry for each patient. The molecular subtypes were defined as: luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-), and Her-2/neu (ER-, PR-, and HER2+). OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed the prevalence of molecular breast cancer subtypes in a population of African-American women and determined their associations with patient demographics and clinicopathologic variables: node status, tumor size, histological grade, p53 mutation status, and breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: The luminal A subtype was the most prevalent in our study sample (55.4%) compared with (11.8%) luminal B, (21.2%) basal cell-like, and (11.6%) Her-2/neu subtypes. The molecular subtypes did not differ by menopausal status. However, when stratified into age-specific groups, the basal cell-like subtype (57.1%) was the most prevalent in the age group <35 y compared with luminal A, luminal B, and Her-2/neu subtypes at 25.0%, 14.3%, and 3.6%, respectively. The basal cell-like subtype also showed an age-specific bimodal distribution with a peak in the <35 y and 51 to 65 y age groups. The basal cell-like and the Her-2/neu subtypes showed an increased association with clinicopathologic variables portending a more aggressive clinical course when compared with luminal A subtype. A paradoxical inverse relationship between the expression of p53 and Bcl-2 protooncoprotein was noted in the molecular subtypes. Breast cancer-specific survival differed significantly among the molecular subtypes (P < 0.04), with the basal cell-like and Her-2/neu subtypes having the poorest outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of the basal cell-like subtype in the young premenopausal African-American women aged <35 y could be a contributory factor to the poorer prognosis of breast cancer observed in this cohort of patients.     

Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry

To investigate the significance of immunohistochemical molecular subtyping, we evaluated outcomes of subtypes based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. Using tissue microarrays, 1006 breast cancer patients between November 1999 and August 2005 were categorized into four subtypes: luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-, Ki-67 < 14%), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-, Ki-67 ≥ 14% or ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-enriched (ER-, PR-, HER2+), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-, PR-, HER2-). Demographics, recurrence patterns, and survival were retrospectively analyzed using uni-/multivariate analyses. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and TNBC accounted for 53.1%, 21.7%, 9.0%, and 16.2% of cases, respectively. Luminal A presented well-differentiation and more co-expression of hormone receptors comparing to luminal B. HER2-enriched showed larger size and higher nodal metastasis. TNBC demonstrated younger age at diagnosis, larger size, undifferentiation, higher proliferation, and frequent visceral metastases. The peak of recurrence for luminal A was at 36 months postoperatively, while that for HER2-enriched and TNBC peaked at 12 months. The relapse risk of luminal B was mixed. Luminal A showed the best survival, but no difference was observed between the other three subtypes. When matched by nodal status, however, TNBC showed the worst outcomes in node-positive patients. In multivariate analyses, luminal A remained a positive prognostic significance. Immunohistochemically-defined subtypes showed different features, recurrence patterns, and survival. Therefore, molecular subtypes using four biomarkers could provide clinically useful information of tumor biology and clinical behaviors, and could be used for determining treatment and surveillance strategies.     

Outcome Following Local‐Regional Recurrence in Women with Early‐Stage Breast Cancer: Impact of Biologic Subtype

Local‐regional recurrence (LRR) after breast‐conserving therapy (BCT) can result in distant metastasis and decreased disease‐free survival (DFS). This study examines factors associated with DFS following LRR. The initial population included 2,233 consecutive women who underwent BCT from 1998 to 2007. Biologic subtype was approximated using a combination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and tumor grade. Cumulative incidence of DFS after LRR was calculated. The association of clinical, pathologic, and treatment parameters with DFS was evaluated using a Cox regression model. At a median follow‐up of 105 months, 82 patients (3.7%) had a LRR. Of these, 66 (80%) were in‐breast and 16 (20%) involved the ipsilateral lymph nodes. Twenty patients subsequently developed distant metastases. Five‐year DFS after initial recurrence was 69.6% for the overall cohort. On univariate analysis, triple‐negative disease (ER/PR/HER2 negative, TNBC) was associated with reduced DFS (HR = 3.8; 95% CI: 1.8–8.1; p < 0.001). Other factors associated with reduced DFS were larger tumor size (HR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.03–1.6; p = 0.02), shorter interval from initial diagnosis to LRR (HR = 0.98 per month; 95% CI: 0.97–0.99; p = 0.02), and no salvage surgery (HR = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.09–0.5; p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TNBC remained the most significant factor associated with reduced DFS (HR = 4.8; 95% CI: 2.25–10.4; p < 0.001). Compared to women with luminal A disease, those with TNBC had significantly worse DFS (37.5% versus 88.3% at 5 years; p < 0.001). Women with TNBC who developed LRR were at high risk of subsequent recurrence. Efforts should be targeted toward both preventing initial recurrence and decreasing subsequent metastasis.     

Prognosis of Japanese Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor and HER2 Expression Determined by Immunohistochemical Staining

BACKGROUND: We classified Japanese breast cancer patients based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 protein expression and compared their prognoses. METHODS: We compared the background and prognostic factors of 600 patients with breast cancer who were assigned to the following groups: luminal A (ER + and/or PR + and HER2-; n = 431; 71.8%), luminal B (ER + and/or PR + and HER2 + ; n = 27; 4.5%), HER2 (ER-, PR-, and HER2 + ; n = 39; 6.5%) and basal-like (BBC; ER-, PR-, and HER2-; n = 103; 17.2%). RESULTS: Background factors did not significantly differ among the groups. Disease-free survival rates were significantly lower for the luminal B, HER2, and BBC subtypes than for the luminal A subtype. Cancer tended to recur earlier and overall survival was significantly lower for the BBC than for the luminal A and HER2 subtypes. Overall survival rates for the luminal B, HER2, and luminal A subtypes were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The subtype distribution for Japanese and Caucasian patients was comparable. The prognosis for the BBC subtype was poorest among all subtypes. Breast cancer tended to recur earlier for the luminal B and HER2 subtypes than for the luminal A subtype; however, overall survival did not significantly differ among them.     

Breast Cancer Subtypes as Defined by the Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), and the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) among Women with Invasive Breast Cancer in California, 1999–2004

Abstract: Breast cancer research examining either molecular profiles or biomarker subtypes has focused on the estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) and ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes. Less is known about the epidemiology or clinical outcome of the other subtypes. This study examines the eight combinations of ER/PR/HER2 in patients with invasive breast cancer. The 5‐year relative survival and the distribution among demographic, socioeconomic, and tumor characteristics of each of the subtypes are examined. Using the California Cancer Registry, 61,309 women with primary invasive breast cancer were classified according to ER/PR/HER2 status. Five‐year relative survival was computed for the eight subtypes. Bivariate analyses were used to assess the distribution of cases across all subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the adjusted odds of having one of the five subtypes with the best and worst survival. Survival varied from 96% (ER+/PR+/HER2−) to 76% (ER−/PR−/HER2+ and ER−/PR−/HER2−). The four subtypes with the poorest survival were all ER negative. Women who were younger than age 50, non‐Hispanic black or Hispanic, of the lowest SES groups, and had stage IV tumors that were undifferentiated were overrepresented in ER−/PR−/HER2+ and triple negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) subtypes. Asian Pacific Islanders had increased odds (OR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26–1.57) of having the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype. Stage III tumors (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.08–1.44) and stage IV tumors (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.27–1.98) had higher odds than stage I tumors of being ER−/PR−/HER2+. Stage IV tumors (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.44–0.67) strongly decreased the odds of the ER−/PR−/HER2− subtype. Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors were over 20 times as likely as well‐differentiated tumors of being ER−/PR−/HER2− or ER−/PR−/HER2+. There are considerable differences in survival, demographics, and tumor characteristics among the eight subtypes. We recommend reporting breast cancer as an ER/PR/HER2 subtype and precisely documenting demographic and tumor characteristics.     

微小RNA在三阴性乳腺癌中的研究进展

三阴性乳腺癌(triple-negative breast cancer,TNBC)是指免疫组织指标ER、PR、HER2三者均为阴性的一种乳腺癌分子亚型,也是一种高度异质性的疾病。TNBC与其他乳腺癌分子亚型相比,生物学行为上表现侵袭性强、易复发和内脏转移,易产生耐药性,预后不良。miRNA是一种很有前景的生物标志物和预测工具,可用于乳腺癌诊断与治疗的各个阶段。本文从高侵袭性机制分析、潜在的治疗靶点探索、预后生物标记物筛选、药物耐药性研究、新辅助治疗pCR预测、与BRCA1/2突变的关联性等方面综述miRNA在TNBC中的研究进展,为TNBC的早期筛查、早期诊断、临床治疗和预后判断提供参考与借鉴。     

Incidence,risk factors and survival of patients with brain metastases at initial metastatic breast cancer diagnosis in China

PurposeTo characterize the incidence, risk factors and survival of patients with brain metastases at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China.MethodsThe China National Cancer Center database was used to identify 2087 MBC patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, treatment and survival information were extracted. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to determine factors predictive of brain metastases at MBC diagnosis and survival, respectively.ResultsBrain metastases occurred in ninety patients (4.3%) at MBC diagnosis, and in 27 patients (2.5%), 42 patients (7.2%) and 21 patients (5.2%) with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR + HER2-), HER2-positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), respectively. HER2-positive subtype (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.40–4.04; p < 0.0001), TNBC subtype (OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.02–3.51; p = 0.005), and metastases to all three sites of bone, liver and lungs (OR = 3.23; 95% CI 1.52–6.87; p = 0.002) were shown to increase the risk of BM at MBC diagnosis. Median survival after BM was 23.7 months. First-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) improved survival compared to trastuzumab-based regimen (44.9 vs 35.4 months, p = 0.09). Factors that independently decreased BM death risk were ECOG<2, brain metastases only and multidisciplinary treatment.ConclusionHER2-positive and TNBC subtypes have a higher incidence of BM at initial MBC diagnosis. Brain screening might be considered in patients with HER2-positive disease at MBC diagnosis, and further prospective randomized study is warranted.     

ER−/PR+/HER2− breast cancer type shows the highest proliferative activity among all other combined phenotypes and is more common in young patients: Experience with 6643 breast cancer cases

The characterization of breast cancer according to its proliferative activity and the expression of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 is a laboratory routine that has been adopted worldwide for prognostic and therapeutic purposes. By combining data on the expression of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2, it is possible to obtain 8 tumor patterns categorized as triple‐negative, nonluminal (i.e. positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 with four subtypes) and luminal (negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 and positive for estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor with three subtypes) tumors. In general, luminal tumors are associated with a higher degree of tumor differentiation and have more favorable clinical outcomes. One of the subtypes of luminal tumors has an ER?/PR+ profile. This is a rather rare tumor subtype that behaves aggressively. The aim of this work was to analyse the proliferative activity of the eight tumor subgroups to verify if the ER?/PR+ type has a higher proliferative activity than the other subtypes, which might be correlated with its more aggressive behavior. To accomplish this, we examined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 and Ki67 data from 6643 cases of breast cancer. We found that the tumor type that was positive for only the progesterone receptor and negative for both the estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (1.3% of all cases) had a proliferative activity that was consistently much higher than those of the other luminal subtypes.     

Lymph node involvement in immunohistochemistry-based molecular classifications of breast cancer

Background

Prognosis and treatment options differ for each molecular subtype of breast cancer, but risk of regional lymph node (LN) metastasis for each subtype has not been well studied. Since LN status is the most important predictor for prognosis, the aim of this study is to investigate the propensity for LN metastasis in each of the five breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Methods

Under an institutional review board–approved protocol, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of all pathologically confirmed breast cancer cases from January 2004 to June 2012. Five subtypes were defined as luminal A (hormone receptor positive, Ki-67 low), luminal B (hormone receptor positive, Ki-67 high), luminal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), HER2-enriched (hormone receptor negative), and triple negative (TN).

Results

A total of 375 patients with complete data were classified by subtype: 95 (25.3%) luminal A, 120 (32%) luminal B, 69 (18.4%) luminal HER2, 26 (6.9%) HER2-enriched, and 65 (17.3%) TN. On univariate analysis, age (<50), higher tumor grade, HER2+ status, tumor size, and molecular subtype were significant for LN positivity. Molecular subtype correlated strongly with tumor size (χ²; P = 0.0004); therefore, multivariable logistic regression did not identify molecular subtype as an independent variable to predict LN positivity.

Conclusions

Luminal A tumors have the lowest risk of LN metastasis, whereas luminal HER2 subtype has the highest risk of LN metastasis. Immunohistochemical-based molecular classification can be readily performed and knowledge of the factors that affect LN status may help with treatment decisions.     

Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in South Asian Population by Immunohistochemical Profile and Her2neu Gene Amplification by FISH Technique: Association with other Clinicopathologic Parameters

Molecular breast cancer subtypes were defined by gene expression prolife; however, immunohistochemical (IHC) expression can categorize breast cancers analogous to gene expression profiling. We aimed to evaluate distribution of these molecular breast cancer subtypes in our population and their association with clinocopathologic parameters. We retrospectively analyzed 1,104 cases of primary breast cancers over 3 years duration. ER, PR, Her2neu IHC staining, and subsequent fluorescent in situ hybridization studies (Her2neu gene amplification in cases with 2+ IHC staining) were performed to categorize breast cancer subtypes. Luminal A breast cancers were most frequent (45.8%) followed by triple negative (18.6%), luminal B (17.8%) and Her2neu (17.8%) subtypes. We found a strong association of breast cancer subtypes with tumor grade and Ki67 proliferation index with triple negative cancers being associated with higher grade and proliferation index. Significant association was seen with age groups, luminal A subtype occurring at a slightly older age, whereas triple negative and Her2neu cancers were more frequent in younger age group. We found a higher proportion of triple negative cancers in our set up, and they were found to have high‐tumor grade and proliferation index along with presentation at younger age. As these cancers are associated with BRCA 1 mutations and abnormal BRCA 1 pathways, we suggest that large scale studies should be done to evaluate BRCA 1 mutations and abnormal BRCA 1 pathways in our population to establish risk factors for this highly aggressive tumor subtype.     

ER and PR Immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus Oncotype DX: Implications for Breast Cancer Treatment

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor (HER2) concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and Oncotype DX, a commercially available RT‐PCR‐based assay which recently began reporting biomarker results was assessed. ER concordance was 98.9% (262/265), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.42, and Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) = 0.25. Positive percent agreement for ER was 98.9% (262/265). One patient with discordant ER results was not offered hormone therapy based on the preferential use of Oncotype DX. PR was concordant in 91.3% (242/265), r = 0.80, ρ = 0.75, and Cohen's kappa (κ) = 0.63. Positive percent agreement for PR was 90.5% (218/241) and negative percent agreement was 100% (24/24). HER2 concordance was 99.2% (245/247), r = 0.35, ρ = 0.28, and κ = 0.12. Positive percent agreement for HER2 was 0% (0/2) and negative percent agreement was 100% (245/245). Of the three FISH HER2‐amplified cases, two were negative and one was equivocal, and all FISH HER2‐equivocal cases (n = 3) were negative by Oncotype DX. Patients that were FISH HER2‐amplified, Oncotype DX HER2‐negative did not receive trastuzumab. Although our results demonstrated high concordance between IHC and Oncotype DX for ER and PR, our data showed poor positive percent agreement for HER2. Compared to FISH, Oncotype DX does not identify HER2‐positive breast carcinomas. The preferential use of Oncotype DX biomarker results over IHC and FISH is discouraged.     

Survival and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patient according to different tumour subtypes as determined by hormone receptor and Her2 immunohistochemistry. a single institution survey spanning 1998 to 2010

As far as recent breast cancer molecular subtype classification is concerned, much work has dealt with clinical outcomes for triple negative and Her2 patients. Less is known about the course of patients in the remaining subtypes. Molecular classification based on immunohistochemistry is widely available and correlates well with genetic microarray assessment, but at a lower cost. The aim of our investigation was to correlate immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer with clinical characteristics and patient outcomes. Since 1998, 1167 patients operated for 1191 invasive breast tumours were included in our database. Patients were regularly followed up until March 2010. Disease-free survival, overall mortality, and breast cancer-specific mortality at 5 years were calculated for the cohort. 72% of tumours were ER+PR±HER2- group, 13% triple negative (ER-PR-HER2-), 10% ER+PR±HER2+ group, and 5% Her2 (ER-PR-HER2+). Cancer-specific survival was 94.2% for the ER+PR+HER2- subtype, 84.8% for the Her2 subtype, 83.3% for the ER+PR-HER2- subtype, and 78.6% for triple negatives. Distant metastases prevalence ranged from 7% to 22% across subtypes, increasing stepwise from ER+PR+HER2-, ER+PR+HER2+, ER+PR-HER2-, ER+PR-HER2+, ER-PR-HER2+ through triple negative. Small, low-grade tumours with low axillary burden were more likely to belong to the ER+PR±HER2- group. Conversely, larger high-grade tumours with significant axillary burden were more likely to belong to Her2 or triple negative groups. ER+PR±HER2- group patients with negative PR receptors performed more like Her2 or triple negative than like the rest of ER+PR±HER2± groups patients. Molecular classification of breast tumours based only on immunohistochemistry is quite useful on practical clinical grounds, as expected. ER+PR±HER2- group patients with negative PR receptors seem to be at high risk and deserve further consideration.     

Triple‐Negative Breast Cancer in Ghanaian Women: The Korle Bu Teaching Hospital Experience

Breast cancers that have negative or extremely low expression of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and non‐amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER2)/neu are termed triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). The majority of TNBC tumors belong to the biologically aggressive basal subtype, and they cannot be managed with targeted endocrine or anti‐HER2/neu agents. In western, high resource environments, risk factors for TNBC include younger age at diagnosis and hereditary susceptibility. Women of African ancestry in the United States and in continental Africa have higher frequencies of TNBC, prompting speculation that this risk may have an inherited basis and may at least partially explain breast cancer survival disparities related to racial/ethnic identity. Efforts to document and confirm the breast cancer burden of continental Africa have been hampered by the limited availability of registry and immunohistochemistry resources. Our goal was to evaluate the breast cancers diagnosed in one of the largest health care facilities in western Africa, and to compare the frequencies as well as risk factors for TNBC versus non‐TNBC in this large referral tertiary hospital. The Korle Bu Teaching Hospital is affiliated with the University of Ghana and is located in Accra, the capital of Ghana. We conducted an institutional, Department of Pathology‐based review of the breast cancer cases seen at this facility for the 2010 calendar year, and for which histopathologic specimens were available. The overall study population of 223 breast cancer cases had a median age of 52.4 years, and most had palpable tumors larger than 5 cm in diameter. More than half were TNBC (130; 58.3%). We observed similar age‐specific frequencies, distribution of stage at diagnosis and tumor grade among cases of TNBC compared to cases of non‐TNBC. Ghanaian breast cancer patients tend to have an advanced stage distribution and relatively younger age at diagnosis compared to Caucasian Americans and African Americans. The triple‐negative molecular marker pattern was the most common subtype of breast cancer seen among this sample of Ghanaian women, regardless of age, tumor grade, or stage of diagnosis. Research into the molecular pathogenesis of TNBC may help elucidate the reasons for its increased prevalence among women with African ancestry.     

���ٰ�����������������������긴�����շ���

目的探讨改良根治术后的乳腺癌免疫组化各分子亚型的预后特性和年复发变化。方法回顾性分析2003年1月至2008年8月常州市第一人民医院应用改良根治术治疗310例乳腺癌的临床资料。根据免疫组化雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)的检测结果分为luminal型、HER2阳性型、三阴性乳腺癌,对比分析不同亚型乳腺癌的临床复发风险。结果 310例乳腺癌总体年复发风险高峰在2年左右,5年有一个平稳的小高峰。免疫组化各分子亚型HER2阳性年复发风险最高,三阴性乳腺癌次之,Luminal型复发风险最低(P<0.05)。HER2阳性型年复发风险最高,但是复发高峰在2～3年,之后直线下降;三阴性乳腺癌复发高峰虽然较HER2阳性型低,但是维持在2～5年复发,延时较长。结论免疫组化的各分子亚型对乳腺癌临床复发起不同的预后指导作用。     

Male breast cancer: Looking for better prognostic subgroups

PurposeMale Breast Cancer (MBC) remains a poor understood disease. Prognostic factors are not well established and specific prognostic subgroups are warranted.Patients/methodsRetrospectively revision of 111 cases treated in the same Cancer Center. Blinded-central pathological revision with immunohistochemical (IHQ) analysis for estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) receptors, HER2, ki67 and p53 was done. Cox regression model was used for uni/multivariate survival analysis. Two classifications of Female Breast Cancer (FBC) subgroups (based in ER, PR, HER2, 2000 classification, and in ER, PR, HER2, ki67, 2013 classification) were used to achieve their prognostic value in MBC patients. Hierarchical clustering was performed to define subgroups based on the six-IHQ panel.ResultsAccording to FBC classifications, the majority of tumors were luminal: A (89.2%; 60.0%) and B (7.2%; 35.8%). Triple negative phenotype was infrequent (2.7%; 3.2%) and HER2 enriched, non-luminal, was rare (≤1% in both). In multivariate analysis the poor prognostic factors were: size >2 cm (HR:1.8; 95%CI:1.0–3.4years, p = 0.049), absence of ER (HR:4.9; 95%CI:1.7–14.3years, p = 0.004) and presence of distant metastasis (HR:5.3; 95%CI:2.2–3.1years, p < 0.001). FBC subtypes were independent prognostic factors (p = 0.009, p = 0.046), but when analyzed only luminal groups, prognosis did not differ regardless the classification used (p > 0.20). Clustering defined different subgroups, that have prognostic value in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005), with better survival in ER/PR+, AR-, HER2-and ki67/p53 low group (median: 11.5 years; 95%CI: 6.2–16.8 years) and worst in PR-group (median:4.5 years; 95%CI: 1.6–7.8 years).ConclusionFBC subtypes do not give the same prognostic information in MBC even in luminal groups. Two subgroups with distinct prognosis were identified in a common six-IHQ panel. Future studies must achieve their real prognostic value in these patients.     

Evaluating the preoperative breast cancer characteristics affecting the accuracy of axillary ultrasound staging

We evaluate the preoperative breast cancer (BC) characteristics that affect the diagnostic accuracy of axillary ultrasound (US) and determine the reliability of US in the different subgroups of BC patients. Axillary US assessments in women with invasive BC diagnosed between 2009 and 2016 in a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnostic accuracy of axillary US was obtained using surgical nodal histology as the gold standard. Preoperative breast tumor sonographic and histological factors affecting axillary US diagnostic accuracy were examined. Of the 605 newly diagnosed invasive BC cases reviewed, 251 (41.5%) had nodal metastases. Axillary US sensitivity was 75.7%, specificity 92.9%, positive predictive value 88.4%, negative predictive value 84.4%, and false‐negative rate 24.3%. Lower US sensitivity was seen with invasive lobular cancer (ILC) (P = .043), grade I/II, (P = .021), unifocal (P = .039), and smaller tumors (P < .001). US specificity was lower in grade III (P < .001), estrogen receptor (ER)‐negative (P < .001), progesterone receptor (PR)‐negative (P = .004), HER2‐positive (P = .015), triple‐negative (P = .001), and larger breast tumors (P < .001). US has moderate sensitivity and good specificity in detecting metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Based on preoperative cancer characteristics, US was less sensitive for nodal metastases from ILC, unifocal, lower grade, and smaller breast tumors. It was also less specific in grade III, ER‐negative, PR‐negative, HER2‐positive, triple‐negative, and larger breast tumors. Caution is suggested in interpreting the US axillary findings of patients with these preoperative tumor features.     

State of art of advanced triple negative breast cancer

Advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease (high probability of visceral metastasis) with poor outcome. Triple negative breast cancer is characterized by lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER2), high histologic grade, and high mitotic rate. Chemotherapy remains the primary systemic treatment, with international guidelines supporting the use of single‐agent taxanes (with or without bevacizumab) or anthracyclines as first‐line therapy, with a median overall survival of approximately 18 months or less. Given the suboptimal outcomes with chemotherapy, new targeted therapies for advanced TNBC are urgently needed. This review summarizes the current status of treatment, and future challenges of using new treatment options for advanced TNBC, such as poly‐adenosine‐diphosphate‐ribose‐polymerase inhibitors (olaparib and talazoparib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg atezolizumab) as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy.     

Locoregional recurrence in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer

Literature shows that HER2/neu positive breast cancer cells are more sensitive to radiation-induced apoptosis by targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor family tyrosine kinase. We selected 466 patients with pT1-2 HER2/neu positive tumors who received adjuvant trastuzumab for primary invasive breast cancer. Patients were divided into three groups [Quadrantectomy followed by conventional radiotherapy vs Quadrantectomy followed by Intra-operative radiotherapy with electrons vs Mastectomy without radiotherapy]. After a median follow-up of 52 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) was 1.9%, 11.5% and 5.0% respectively (p < 0.01). At the multivariate analysis, extensive perivascular invasion, Luminal B HER2/Progesterone Receptor (PgR) negative status and Quadrantectomy followed by Intra-operative radiotherapy with electrons have significantly increased the risk of LRR. Our results suggest that HER2/neu positive breast cancer might have better outcomes when treated simultaneously with external radiotherapy and trastuzumab. Moreover, we underline the importance of PgR and further new stratification of risk among luminal subtypes.