Tecnis Z9000人工晶状体植入术后的视功能改变

目的:评价非球面人工晶状体(intraocular lens,IOL)TecnisZ9000对提高年龄相关性白内障患者术后视功能的作用。方法:选取年龄相关性白内障患者34例36眼,其中18眼为Tecnis Z9000组,18眼为传统球面人工晶状体组。检查术后3mo最佳矫正远视力,不同亮度环境及有、无散瞳条件下的对比敏感度(contrast sensitivity,CS)。结果:手术后3mo最佳矫正远视力Tecnis Z9000组为0.89±0.17,球面人工晶状体组为0.76±0.16,两组差异有显著性(P<0.05)。正常瞳孔下,两组晶状体在不同空间频率(1.5,3,6,12,18c/d)、不同照明条件下CS无显著差别。散瞳后Tecnis组亮环境(亮度为85cd/m2)下的12,18c/dCS及暗环境(亮度为3cd/m2)下1.5,3c/dCS均分别与同条件下的球面人工晶状体组比较差异有显著性。结论:白内障术后早期,Tecnis Z9000可提高最佳矫正远视力和对比敏感度,改善术眼视功能。     

白内障手术植入球面和非球面人工晶状体后视觉质量的比较

目的 评估白内障手术植入负球差设计的非球面折叠式人工晶状体(Intraocularlen,IOL)后的视觉质量.方法 取112例(152只眼)白内障超声乳化手术患者按数字表法被分为三组,第一组植入TecnisZ9003IOL(美国 AMO 公司),第二组植入AcrysofIQIOL(美国Alcon公司),第三组植入HQIOL(法国Hexavision公司).于术后一周、一月、三月分别检测裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力,无眩光及有眩光环境下的白天夜晚对比敏感度,同时检测全眼的球差、第三、第四、第五阶像差均方根(root mean square,RMS)、总高阶像差(higher-order aberration,HOA)RMS以及总像差(total ocular aberration,TOA)RMS.结果 术后三次随访三组患者的裸眼视力和最佳矫正视力差异均没有统计学意义.术后一周、一月时三组白天对比敏感度未见显著差异,术后一月、三月时TecnisZ9003组和AcrysofIQ组的夜间对比敏感度在中、低空间频率上明显好于HQ组,同时术后三月时该两组的白天对比敏感度亦好于HQ组,差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).另外,术后三次随访TecnisZ9003组和AcrysofIQ组全眼的球差、RMS4均低于HQ组,在术后一月、三月时HOA较HQ组低,同时术后三次随访在瞳孔直径6mm大小时TOA亦较低,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 植入负球差设计的非球面人工晶状体可提高白内障患者术后对比敏感度,降低球差和高阶像差,获得更好的视觉质量.     

白内障手术植入球面和非球面人工晶状体后视觉质量的比较

目的 评估白内障手术植入负球差设计的非球面折叠式人工晶状体(Intraocularlen,IOL)后的视觉质量.方法 取112例(152只眼)白内障超声乳化手术患者按数字表法被分为三组,第一组植入TecnisZ9003IOL(美国 AMO 公司),第二组植入AcrysofIQIOL(美国Alcon公司),第三组植入HQIOL(法国Hexavision公司).于术后一周、一月、三月分别检测裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力,无眩光及有眩光环境下的白天夜晚对比敏感度,同时检测全眼的球差、第三、第四、第五阶像差均方根(root mean square,RMS)、总高阶像差(higher-order aberration,HOA)RMS以及总像差(total ocular aberration,TOA)RMS.结果 术后三次随访三组患者的裸眼视力和最佳矫正视力差异均没有统计学意义.术后一周、一月时三组白天对比敏感度未见显著差异,术后一月、三月时TecnisZ9003组和AcrysofIQ组的夜间对比敏感度在中、低空间频率上明显好于HQ组,同时术后三月时该两组的白天对比敏感度亦好于HQ组,差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).另外,术后三次随访TecnisZ9003组和AcrysofIQ组全眼的球差、RMS4均低于HQ组,在术后一月、三月时HOA较HQ组低,同时术后三次随访在瞳孔直径6mm大小时TOA亦较低,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 植入负球差设计的非球面人工晶状体可提高白内障患者术后对比敏感度,降低球差和高阶像差,获得更好的视觉质量.     

Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To determine whether pupil size is correlated with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity at all distances in eyes with an apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Private Clinic, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: Six months after surgery, the best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, and distance contrast sensitivity under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (5 cd/m2) conditions were measured in 670 eyes of 335 consecutive patients who had implantation of the AcrySof ReSTOR Natural IOL (SN60D3, Alcon). Pupil diameters in distance vision were measured using a pupillometer. RESULTS: The logMAR best corrected distance acuity was significantly better with larger pupils (r = 0.297; P = 1.36 x 10(-8)), whereas logMAR best distance-corrected near acuity was significantly worse with larger pupils (r = 0.276, P = 1.02 x 10(-7)). For all pupil diameters, intermediate visual acuity worsened significantly as the distance of the test increased (P<.01). Statistically significant differences in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies were found between the small-pupil and large-pupil groups (P<.01). Distance photopic contrast sensitivity and mesopic contrast sensitivity were better in patients with large pupils than in patients with small pupils. CONCLUSIONS: A larger pupil was correlated significantly with better distance visual acuity and with worse near visual acuity. For all pupil diameters, intermediate visual acuity worsened significantly as the distance of the test increased. Distance contrast sensitivity was better with larger pupils at all spatial frequencies in bright-light and dim-light conditions.     

非球面人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量对比分析

目的:评价3种非球面人工晶状体(AcrySof SN60WF、TecnisZ9001和KS-3Ai)植入术后的视觉质量。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,收集我院老年性白内障手术患者88例126眼,平均年龄67.3±8.7岁,将入选患者按植入不同的人工晶状体(Intraocular lens,IOL)随机分为4组:AcrySofSN60WF(IQ)组(23例33眼)、TecnisZ9001组(23例33眼)、KS-3Ai组(20例29眼),SN60AT球面人工晶状体组为对照组(22例31眼)。术后随访3mo,观察指标:裸眼视力(uncorrected visual acuity,UCVA)及最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA),眼压,等效球镜度数,角膜Q值,瞳孔直径,6mm全眼球总高阶像差及四阶球差均方根值(root mean square,RMS),夜光、昼光及夜眩光3种视觉条件下的对比敏感度(contrast sensitivity,CS)。结果:术后各组的UCVA、BCVA、等效球镜度数和瞳孔直径均无统计学差异。总高阶像差和四阶球差RMS:非球面组低于球面组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);非球面组间比较无统计学差异。术后角膜Q值与球差成正相关(r=0.183,P<0.05)。术后对比敏感度:与球面IOL相比,IQ,Tecnis可提高术后3种视觉条件下的CS,KS-3Ai可提高术后夜光、夜眩光两种视觉条件下的CS;非球面IOL组间比较,IQ组在昼光、夜眩光视觉条件下的CS好于Tecnis组和KS-3Ai组,TECNIS组和KS-3Ai组之间在3种视觉条件下均无统计学差异。结论:3种非球面IOL均可有效地减少术眼的总高阶像差和四阶球差。3种非球面IOL均可以提高术眼术后的CS,IQ组在昼光、夜眩光视觉条件下的CS与Tecnis组和KS-3Ai组相比较差异具有统计学意义,Tecnis组和KS-3Ai组之间在3种视觉条件下的CS均无统计学差异。     

Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: prospective randomized masked clinical trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of an AcrySof IQ Natural SN60WF aspherical intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories). SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: One hundred twenty consecutive patients who had phacoemulsification in a prospective triple-masked trial were randomized to receive an AcrySof SA60AT IOL (40 eyes), AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL (40 eyes), or AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL (40 eyes). At 3 months, contrast sensitivity was measured using the CSV-1000E contrast sensitivity chart test face (Vector Vision) at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degrees (cpd) under photopic conditions (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic conditions (2.7 cd/m(2)) with 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm fixed central apertures, with and without glare. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used and a pair-wise comparison performed. The main outcome measure was the difference in contrast sensitivity between IOLs at each spatial frequency. RESULTS: The best corrected visual acuity was similar between the 3 IOL groups (P = .6). The AcrySof IQ group had significantly higher contrast sensitivity at 18 cpd under photopic conditions (P = .008); at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd during mesopic testing with a 4.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .011, P = .007, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .003, P = .006, P = .005, and P = .004, respectively); and at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing with a 6.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .006, P = .009, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .019, P = .002, P = .01, and P = .017, respectively). CONCLUSION: Eyes with the AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL had significantly higher contrast sensitivity than eyes with an AcrySof SA60AT or AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing (with and without glare) with 4.0 and 6.0 mm artificial pupil.     

Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR+/-0.004 (SD) and 0.019+/-0.020 logMAR, respectively (approximately 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011+/-0.012 logMAR and 0.035+/-0.013 logMAR, respectively (approximately 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P<.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P>.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.     

Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens (IOL) (Pfizer) with a modified prolate anterior surface provides better quality of vision than a conventional spherical IOL. SETTING: Oregon Eye Institute, Eugene, Oregon, USA. METHODS: Patients presenting for cataract surgery who were randomly assigned to receive a Tecnis Z9000 IOL (Pfizer) or a Sensar OptiEdge AR40e IOL (AMO) in 1 eye were followed for 3 months postoperatively. The patient could elect to have the same type of IOL implanted in the fellow eye. The results of sine-wave grating contrast sensitivity testing under mesopic and photopic conditions were compared interindividually. RESULTS: Monocular comparison was made between the 2 IOL groups, which comprised 15 patients each. The Tecnis IOL provided significantly better contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree (cpd) under photopic conditions and at 1.5 and 3 cpd under mesopic conditions. Seven patients with a Tecnis IOL and 9 patients with an AR40e IOL had subsequent implantation in the fellow eye. In all eyes, including fellow eyes, having IOL implantation, the Tecnis provided significantly better contrast sensitivity at 3 and 6 cpd under photopic conditions and at 1.5, 3, and 6 cpd under mesopic conditions. The mean contrast sensitivity in fellow eyes showed that the Tecnis IOL produced significantly better results at some spatial frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: Results show the Tecnis IOL with a modified prolate anterior surface may produce better contrast sensitivity than a standard spherical IOL under mesopic and photopic conditions. Because contrast sensitivity testing correlates well with functional vision, a goal of future research should be to evaluate patient performance using functional tests such as driving simulation.     

人工晶状体前表面非球面化改良能够改善视觉质量

目的:根据对比敏感度结果比较前表面改良的非球面Tecnis Z9000 IOL和标准的911A IOL的光学性能.方法:Tecnis Z9000硅凝胶IOL和911A IOL具有共同的基本特征包括12mm总长度、三片直边双凸6mm的光学直径和成角的聚丙乙烯C襻.对连续10例双侧白内障患者(20眼)进行了随机前瞻研究,所有患者都接受了白内障超声乳化手术并随机于1眼植入Tecnis Z9000IOL,另1眼在术后6wk内植入911A IOL作为对照,术后6wk进行对比敏感度检查,所得数据采用秩和检验进行比较.结果:随机植入Tecnis IOL组的术前平均最佳Snellen矫正视力为6/8.5(0.70),植入911A I0L组为6/9.4(0.64),所有20眼术后最佳矫正视力都达到了6/6(1.0).术后对比敏感度分析发现两组在12和18 cpd(明视)、1.5和3 cpd(暮视)以及1.5和3 cpd(暮视伴眩光)均有统计学差异(P＜0.05)结论:Tecnis Z9000 I0L被证明其对比敏感度在明视高空间频率和暮视低空间频率方面均显著优于911A IOL.     

Improving quality of vision with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens: A prospective clinical trial

AIM: To compare the optical performance of the anterior surface modified prolate Tecnis Z9000 IOL with the standard 911A IOL in terms of contrast sensitivity outcomes. · METHODS: The Tecnis Z9000 silicone IOL shares the same basic characteristics with the 911A IOL including a 12.0mm overall diameter, 3-piece equiconvex 6.0mm optic and angulated cap C polyvinylidene fluoride haptics. This is a randomized prospective study that involved ten consecutive patients (20 eyes) with bilateral cataracts. Each patient underwent phacoemulsification and received randomly the Tecnis Z9000 IOL in one eye and the control (911A IOL) in the fellow eye within 6 weeks period of one another. Contrast sensitivity was measured after six postoperative weeks. The collected data were analyzed through using Mann Whitney U test. · RESULTS: The mean pre-operative best spectacle corrected Snellen visual acuity in the eyes that were randomly selected to receive the Tecnis IOL was 6/8.5 (0.70) and in the eye selected to receive the 911A IOL was 6/9.4(0.64). Postoperatively all 20 eyes achieved best corrected Snellen visual acuity of 6/6 (1.0). Postoperative contrast sensitivity testing showed statistically significant differences (P <0.05) between the two IOLs at 12 and 18 cpd under photopic, at 1.5 and 3 cpd under mesopic, and at 1.5 and 3 cpd under mesopic with glare conditions. · CONCLUSION: The Tecnis Z9000 IOL proved to have statistically significant superior contrast sensitivity to the 911A IOL at high spatial frequencies under photopic conditions and at low spatial frequencies under mesopic and mesopic with glare conditions.     

Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a comparative study

PURPOSE: To determine whether implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) with a modified anterior aspheric surface results in reduced spherical aberration and improved contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, interventional case series. METHODS: In an intraindividual randomized prospective study of 25 patients with bilateral cataract, an IOL with a modified anterior surface (Tecnis Z9001; Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, California, USA; group 1) was compared with biconvex lens with spherical surfaces (ClariFlex; Advanced Medical Optics; group 2). Ocular aberrations for a 5.0-mm pupil and 6.0-mm pupil were measured with Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Quality of vision was measured by visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions. All patients were followed up for three months. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in postoperative uncorrected and best-corrected distance vision acuity after a follow-up of three months existed between the groups. Postoperative contrast sensitivity testing revealed significant differences between the groups under photopic and mesopic conditions. These differences reached statistical significance under photopic conditions at three spatial frequencies and under mesopic conditions at all spatial frequencies. When analyzing higher-order aberrations, the difference between the groups was statistically significant at the 5.00-mm and 6.00-mm pupil diameters, with the group 1 inducing less higher-order aberration and also less spherical aberration compared with group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Results show the Tecnis Z9001 IOL with a modified anterior aspheric surface induced significantly less higher-order aberration and spherical aberration compared with the ClariFlex IOL. Contrast sensitivity revealed better values under photopic and mesopic conditions with the Tecnis Z9001 IOL.     

Retinal image contrast and functional visual performance with aspheric, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses. Prospective evaluation

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of an aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) (Tecnis Z-9000, Pharmacia Corp.) with those of conventional silicone (AA4207VF, Staar Surgical) and acrylic (AcrySof SA60AT, Alcon Surgical) lenses on retinal imaging and functional visual performance. SETTING: Eye Laser Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA. METHODS: In this prospective study, 221 eyes of 156 patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 IOLs. Visual acuity was measured preoperatively and 1 day, 1 and 3 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Fundus photography and photopic and mesopic functional acuity contrast testing were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The differences in the preoperative and postoperative spherical and astigmatic refractive errors and best corrected visual acuity among groups were not statistically significant. The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was best in the aspheric group in the first month. Functional acuity contrast testing showed the aspheric IOL group had a 38% to 47% increase in photopic vision, 38% in photopic with glare, 43% to 100% in mesopic, and 9% to 100% in mesopic with glare. There was no increase in photopic vision in the acrylic group but increases of 38% in photopic with glare, 25% to 50% in mesopic, and 36% to 50% in mesopic with glare. The spherical silicone IOL group had no increase in contrast testing from preoperatively. Digital analysis of retinal imaging showed increased threshold luminance levels in the aspheric group (range 116 to 208 cd/m2) and a 4-fold increase in image contrast. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 IOLs led to improved visual acuity after cataract surgery. The aspheric IOL provided a significant improvement in retinal image contrast and visual performance measured by visual acuity and functional acuity contrast testing. This improvement was greatest in night vision and night vision with glare compared to the performance of conventional spherical silicone and acrylic IOLs.     

Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation Clinical comparative study

PURPOSE: To determine whether implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) with a modified posterior aspherical surface (AcrySof IQ, Alcon Surgical Laboratories) results in reduced ocular aberrations (spherical aberration) and improved contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery. SETTING: Brasilia Ophthalmologic Hospital, Brasilia, and Sao Geraldo Eye Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODS: In an intraindividual randomized prospective study of 25 patients with bilateral cataract, an IOL with a modified posterior surface (AcrySof IQ) was compared with a biconvex IOL with spherical surfaces (AcrySof Natural, Alcon). Ocular aberrations with a 5.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Quality of vision was measured by visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions. All patients were followed for 3 months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between eyes in postoperative uncorrected and best corrected distance visual acuities after a follow-up of 1 month and 3 months. Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions without glare at 18 cycles per degree (cpd) (P = .04) and under mesopic conditions without glare at all spatial frequencies (3 cpd, 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd; P = .03, P = .009, P = .003, and P = .003, respectively) and with glare at 3 cpd and 6 cpd (P = .001 and P = .02, respectively). The difference in higher-order aberration (HOA) values between groups was statistically significant with a 5.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil, with the AcrySof IQ IOL inducing less HOA than the AcrySof Natural IOL. Eyes with an AcrySof IQ IOL also had statistically significant less spherical aberration than eyes with an AcrySof Natural IOL with both pupil diameters (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof IQ IOL with a modified posterior surface induced significantly less HOA and spherical aberration than the AcrySof Natural IOL. Contrast sensitivity was better under mesopic conditions with the AcrySof IQ IOL.     

多焦点人工晶状体与非球面人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的临床研究

目的客观与主观检测结合评价非球面设计的多焦点与单焦点人工晶状体植入术后的视觉质量。方法132例（207只眼）白内障患者分别植入非球面的多焦点人工晶状体AcrySof IQ ReSTOR IOL和单焦点人工晶状体AcrySof IQ IOL。记录患者手术后的裸眼远、近视力,矫正远、近视力。术后3个月检测患者明视、暗视和暗视眩光状态的对比敏感度。采用VF-14（Visual function-14）视功能和生存质量调查问卷评价患者主观的视觉质量。结果术后两组裸眼远视力（t=0．61,P〉0．05）最佳矫正近视力（t=1．877,P〉0．05）差异无统计学意义。非矫正近视力多焦点组优于单焦点组（t=11．38,P〈0．001）,单焦点组在明光、暗光、暗光眩光条件下各空间频率对比敏感度均高于多焦点组,明光条件下3cpd和6cpd空间频率差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,暗光眩光条件下中高频率差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,两组无患者存在严重的视觉干扰现象。两组术后视远时脱镜率均大于98％,视近时脱镜率多焦点组为78．9％,单焦点组为10．9％。结论与单焦点人工晶状体相比,除了对比敏感度下降,多焦点人工晶状体能提供令人满意的术后视功能和生活质量,患者能获得较高的视觉质量。     

Symmetric bilateral implantation of a distance-dominant diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To assess visual results after symmetrical bilateral implantation of a distance-dominant bifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: Fifty patients had bilateral implantation of a distance-dominant diffractive bifocal 447D IOL (Acri.Tec GmbH) in a prospective study. Monocular and binocular best corrected distance visual acuities and best distance-corrected near visual acuity, binocular best distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity, and distance contrast sensitivity under photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (5 cd/m(2)) conditions were determined. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, the mean binocular best corrected distance acuity and best corrected distance near acuity were 0.02 +/- 0.04 logMAR and 0.04 +/- 0.03 logMAR, respectively. Binocular best corrected distance intermediate visual acuity worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test: from 0.04 +/- 0.03 logMAR at 33 cm to 0.21 +/- 0.08 logMAR at 70 cm (P<.01). Contrast sensitivity was within normal limits under photopic and mesopic conditions. Binocular contrast sensitivity was statistically significantly better than monocular contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies under both illumination levels (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Bilateral implantation of the distance-dominant bifocal 447D IOL provided good simultaneous distance, near, and intermediate vision with improved contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions.     

衍射型多焦点人工晶状体眼对比敏感度和高阶像差研究

目的 对比研究衍射型多焦点和单焦点人工晶状体眼的对比敏感度和高阶像差.方法 所有患者按照植入的人工晶状体类型分成多焦组和单焦组.多焦组植入衍射型多焦点人工晶状体AcrySofReSTOR(Alton),72例(109只眼);单焦组植入单焦点人工晶状体AcrySofSA60AT(Alcon),88例(130只眼).术后随访6～24月,观察远近视力,脱镜率,对比敏感度,高阶像差.结果 单焦组在明光、暗光、暗光眩光条件下各空间频率对比敏感度均高于多焦组,明光条件下3epd和6cpd(中频)空间频率差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),暗光眩光条件下中高频率(除1.5cpd外)差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).术后3阶慧差,4阶球差,总高阶像差均方根(RMS)多焦组略高于单焦组,但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).两组间远视力无显著性差异,近视力多焦组101只眼(91.8%)≥J3,单焦组12只眼(9.2%).两组完全脱镜率分别为98只眼(89.1%)和9只眼(6.9%).结论 衍射型多焦点人工晶状体在某些空间频率对比敏感度低于单焦组,没有明显增加高阶像差和视觉干扰;患者具有良好的远近视力和较高的脱镜率.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different aspheric intraocular lenses

Acta Ophthalmol. 2011: 89: 40–46

Abstract.

Purpose: To compare the quality of vision achieved with different aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) implants. Methods: This prospective, comparative and randomized study included 90 eyes that underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with one of three different aspheric IOLs. Patients were assigned randomly to receive one type of aspheric IOL: Tecnis Z9003^® (Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, California, USA) (Group A), Acrysof IQ SN60WF^® (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (Group B) or Akreos ADAPT‐AO^® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) (Group C). Ophthalmic examinations, including uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, wavefront analysis, contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions, and a subjective questionnaire, were performed postoperatively. Results: The mean BCVA, mean refractive error and high‐order aberrations were not significantly different among the three groups. The spherical aberrations were 0.0021 ± 0.096 for group A, 0.048 ± 0.071 for group B and 0.11 ± 0.089 for group C, indicating a significantly lower magnitude in group A (p = 0.012). In addition, group A showed significantly better results in contrast sensitivity under mesopic (p = 0.042) and photopic (p = 0.047, 0.049) conditions at low spatial frequencies. Nevertheless, postoperative patient satisfaction was not different among the three groups. Conclusion: The Tecnis Z9003^® IOL reduced spherical aberrations and improved contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions at low spatial frequencies. Nevertheless, the final visual quality was not different among the three groups.     

非球面人工晶状体植入术后对比敏感度观察

目的:评价白内障超声乳化吸除联合非球面人工晶状体(intraocularlens,IOL)植入术后对比敏感度(contrast sensitivity,CS)的变化。方法:对45例(48眼)老年性白内障患者实施超声乳化吸除联合IOL植入术,24例(25眼)植入Z9001非球面IOL(AIOL);21例(23眼)植入AR40e单焦球面IOL(SI-OL)。术后3mo应用美国Stereo Optical公司产的OPTEC 6500P视功能测试系统的对比敏感度测试包分别在空间频率为1.5,3,6,12,18cpd的昼及夜照明条件下对手术眼进行有眩光和无眩光的对比敏感度检查。所得数据进行t检验。结果:术后3mo,AIOL组在大部分空间频率下CS普遍优于SIOL组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在1.5cpd有眩光昼及夜照明条件,AIOL组的CS与SIOL组无统计学差异。结论:植入Z9001非球面IOL后,提高了患者的对比敏感度,明显改善患者的视觉质量.     

Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To assess the visual results after bilateral implantation of the bifocal Acri.LISA 366D intraocular lens (IOL) (Acri.Tec AG). SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: Eighty-one patients had bilateral implantation of the distance-dominant bifocal Acri.LISA 366D IOL in a prospective study. Monocular and binocular best corrected distance visual acuity and best distance-corrected near visual acuity, binocular best distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity, and distance contrast sensitivity under photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (5 cd/m(2)) conditions were determined. RESULTS: At the 3-month postoperative visit, the mean binocular best corrected distance acuity was 0.048 +/- 0.111 logMAR and the mean binocular best distance-corrected near acuity, 0.012 +/- 0.0084 logMAR (both approximately 20/20). The mean binocular best distance-corrected intermediate acuity changed significantly as a function of the distance of the test, from 0.012 +/- 0.084 logMAR (approximately 20/20) at 33 cm to 0.265 +/- 0.099 logMAR (approximately 20/40) at 70 cm (P<.01). Contrast sensitivity was within normal limits under photopic and mesopic conditions. Binocular contrast sensitivity was statistically significantly better than monocular contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies under both illumination levels (P<.01). CONCLUSION: The Acri.LISA 366D IOL provided a satisfactory full range of vision; a high level of uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate, and near acuity; and improved contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions.     

Prospective randomized study of clinical performance of 3 aspheric and 2 spherical intraocular lenses in 250 eyes

PURPOSE: To compare the quality of vision with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses (IOLs) in pseudophakic patients. METHODS: This prospective, comparative, randomized study included 250 eyes of 125 patients with bilateral cataracts. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either IOLs with a spherical biconvex optic (Acrysof SN6OAT [Alcon] or Sensar AR40e [Advanced Medical Optics, AMO]) or IOLs with an aspheric optic (Acrysof IQ SN6OWF [Alcon], Tecnis Z9000 [AMO], or Sofport L161AO [Bausch & Lomb]). Ophthalmologic examination including best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, pupil size, ocular dominance investigation, contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions, and wavefront analysis was performed 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Aspheric IOLs showed better contrast sensitivity compared to spherical IOLs at spatial frequencies of 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) under photopic conditions and at all spatial frequencies under mesopic conditions. There was no significant difference among the three aspheric IOLs at all spatial frequencies under either photopic or mesopic conditions. Mean total spherical aberration was statistically lower in dominant eyes with aspheric IOLs (0.05 +/- 0.06, 0.11 +/- 0.1, and 0.19 +/- 0.08 pm for the Tecnis Z9000, Acrysof IQ SN6OWF, and Sofport L161AO, respectively) compared with eyes with spherical IOLs (0.62 +/- 0.24 and 0.46 +/- 0.19 microm for the Acrysof SN6OAT and Sensar AR40e, respectively) for a 5-mm pupil diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The aspheric IOLs had less wavefront aberrations and performed better under both photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity compared to the spherical IOLs. These findings confirm it is possible to improve the optical performance of IOLs by modifying the surfaces.