Key role of the CEA test in the diagnosis and surgical therapy of recurrent colorectal cancer

Between 1978 and 1984, 87 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer have been operated upon. In 10 of 35 patients with locoregional recurrence and 24 of 52 with distant metastases therapy was potentially curative. Of 87 patients 73 had elevated CEA levels (greater than or equal to 5 ng/ml) at the time of diagnosis. In 65 of 73 patients the CEA increase preceded the recognition of recurrence and in 14 patients the diagnosis could be confirmed only by a second-look operation. Patients with metastases (91.3%) showed CEA elevation more often than those with locoregional recurrence (71.4%). Patients with operable disease had significantly (p less than 0.05) lower CEA values (median 19.7 ng/ml) than those with inoperable recurrent carcinomas (median 36.9 ng/ml).     

Results of CEA-initiated second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal cancer

Seventy-five consecutive patients were followed up prospectively for a median of 24 months after resection of Dukes/Kirklin class B-2 or C colorectal cancers with serial plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values (a mean of 14 per patient) to assess the usefulness of CEA-initiated second-look surgery. Fifteen of 18 tumor recurrences in this group were first diagnosed at reexploration initiated after two successively increasing CEA values despite no other evidence of recurrence. Four of the 15 patients found to have tumor at second-look surgery were resected for cure, and 2 of these patients remain without evidence of disease 13 and 24 months later. Five patients whose recurrences could not be resected for cure were treated with partial tumor resection, regional infusion of chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy or external beam radiotherapy. Four of these were alive at least 10 months later. Six patients found to have widespread regional or distant tumor recurrence were not treated at all and were dead 6 months after reexploration. Seven of the nine patients whose recurrences were considered resectable or treatable had rates of CEA increase of less than 2.1 ng/30 days. All six of the patients not treatable at second-look surgery had rates of postoperative CEA increase greater than 2.1 ng/30 days. The value of serial CEA as the earliest indicator of tumor recurrence in this group of patients was clear. The rate of postoperative plasma CEA increase after primary resection may help identify those patients most likely to benefit from second-look surgery.     

Prognostic value of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen concentration and extent of invasion of resection margins after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of postoperative concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and extent of surgical margins after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Switzerland. SUBJECTS: 49 patients with hepatic metastases after primary colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Resection of hepatic metastases MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of prognostic value of variables by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median survival was 24 months (range 5-86 months). Resection margins were clear (> 1-cm) in 10, close (< 1-cm) in 25 and invaded in 9 patients. On univariate analysis, a postoperative concentration of CEA of <4ng/ml was correlated with prolonged survival (p < 0.001), but the width of the resection margin was not of prognostic importance. There was no correlation between width of resection margins and postoperative concentration of CEA (p = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, postoperative concentrations of CEA of 4 ng/ml or more were associated with increased risk of death (relative risk 7.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-18.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative CEA offers better prognostic discrimination than the width of resection margins after resection of liver metastases from colorectal tumours. Some patients with invaded resection margins did survive for 3 years, but no patient did whose CEA concentration was 4 ng/ml or more. The definition of a potentially curative hepatic resection should include a postoperative CEA concentration of <4 ng/ml (within the reference range).     

The usefulness and limitations of CEA assay in the management of colorectal cancer

We investigated the usefulness and limitations of the measurement of CEA in the evaluation of tumor resection and the detection of recurrence in colorectal cancer patients. Preoperatively, 46 of 90 patients (51.1%) had CEA values of 5.0 ng/ml or higher. The percentage of patients with elevated CEA in whom the CEA values returned to normal one month postoperatively was significantly higher in those who had undergone a curative resection than in those who had undergone a non-curative resection (p<0.02). Among patients with normal CEA values, the changes were nil or only slight in CEA values, one month postoperatively Among 28 with recurrences, 24 (85.7%) had CEA values of 5.0 ng/ml or higher. All 11 with liver recurrences had values of 10.0 ng/ml or higher. In 4 with liver recurrences and in cases where CEA measurements were made, CEA values were found to be abnormal 3 to 10 months before the recurrences and a rapid elvation occurred for a short period. However, 4 out of 10 with local or lymphnode recurrences showed normal CEA values. CEA measurement was useful in detection of liver recurrences, but not so useful in detecting local or lymphnode recurrences.     

Correlation between the results of carcinoembryonal antigen (CEA) test and the clinical stage of colorectal carcinoma

Correlation between results of CEA test and clinical stage of colorectal carcinoma is described. No correlation was found between the different stages and the actual CEA titre. Normalization of an increased preoperative serum CEA level indicated, however, nearly always the radical character of the intervention. Critically high (above 30 ng/per ml) CEA value observed in Dukes' stages C and D can be considered bad prognostic signs. Patients like these died within one year. Results of CEA tests are also useful complementary data contributing to the diagnosis of recurrence or distant metastases.     

Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The authors describe their experience with pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer with emphasis on patient selection for curative intent based on known tumor risk factors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic recurrence is a formidable problem in 30% of patients who have undergone a curative resection of primary rectal cancer. Although radiation can reduce the development of local recurrence and can provide palliation to many patients with localized disease, it is not curative. The authors and others have used the technique of abdominal sacral resection (ABSR) with or without pelvic exenteration to resect pelvic recurrence and its musculoskeletal extensions in selected patients with satisfactory long-term survival. METHODS: The technique of ABSR with or without pelvic exenteration or resection of pelvic viscera, which the authors have described previously, was used in 53 patients with recurrent rectal cancer--47 patients for curative intent and 6 for palliation. Previous surgeries were abdominal perineal resections (APRs) in 26 patients, anterior resections in 19 patients, and other procedures in 2 patients; original primary Dukes' stage was B in 52% and C in 48%. Almost all patients had been irradiated previously, generally in the 4000 to 5900 cGy range. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (before ABSR) were elevated (> 5 ng/mL) in 54%. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity was encountered in most patients. Mortality was 8.5% in the curative group. Long-term survival for 4 years was achieved in 14 of 43 patients (33%), and 10 patients were alive with an acceptable quality of life after 5 years. Patients who had previous anterior resections or whose preoperative CEA levels were less than 10 ng/mL had a survival rate of approximately 45%, whereas patients with previous APRs and preoperative CEA levels greater than 10 ng/mL had a survival rate of only 15% to 18%. Patients with bone marrow invasion, positive margins, or pelvic node metastases had a median survival of only 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer can be resected safely with expectation of long-term survival of 33%. Patient selection based on known risk factors can identify patients most likely to benefit from resection and eliminate those who should be treated for palliation only.     

Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes A colorectal cancer

Patients with Dukes A (UICC I) colorectal cancer have a good prognosis after curative resection. It is not known, however, if the outcome is significantly different for UICC Ia and Ib patients or if patients with reduced risks of recurrences can be identified early after surgery. This is of interest, as it would permit a more cost-effective, patient-oriented, and tumor stage-oriented follow-up program. To study these questions, a prospective follow-up database, including 1375 patients after curative resection of colorectal cancer, was analyzed. A total of 296 patients with Dukes A colorectal cancer with a median follow-up of 44 months were studied. Perioperative and follow-up mortality rates were 3% and 14%, respectively. Recurrent disease developed in 10% of Dukes A patients after a disease-free interval of 16 months. Significantly more patients suffering from pT2 (UICC Ib) cancer had recurrent disease than patients with pT1 (UICC Ia) cancer (13% vs. 4%; p <0.05). Preoperative CEA levels in patients with recurrent disease were significantly higher than in long-term disease-free patients (5.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; p <0.05). Curative resection of recurrent disease was achieved in 38% of the patients with recurrences (4% of all patients). Survival analysis showed significantly better survival in patients with Dukes A cancer than in those at higher tumor stages (log rank, <0.0001), and only 39% of all Dukes A patients who died during follow-up had recurrent disease. Dukes A (UICC Ia and Ib) colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 22% of our patients treated for cure, and long-term survival was 86%. There were significantly fewer cases of recurrent disease after curative resection of UICC Ia (pT1N0M0) cancer, so we propose a novel, less intensive follow-up regimen for these patients, leading to a more cost-effective, patient-oriented, and tumor stage-oriented follow-up program.     

Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level as a Predictive Factor of Recurrence After Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Background  We evaluated the prognostic value of the preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods  The study group comprised 638 patients. The optimal cutoff value for the preoperative serum CEA level was determined. Predictive factors of recurrence were evaluated using multivariate analyses. The relapse-free time was investigated according to the CEA level. Results  All patients underwent potentially curative resection for CRC without distant metastasis, classified as stage I, II, or III. The optimal cutoff value for preoperative serum CEA level was 10 ng/ml. Elevated preoperative serum CEA level was observed in 92 patients. Multivariate analysis identified tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) stage and preoperative serum CEA level as independent predictive factors of recurrence. The relapse-free survival between CEA levels >10 ng/ml and <10 ng/ml significantly differed in patients with stage II and III. However, there was no significant difference in relapse-free survival between CEA levels >10 ng/ml and <10 ng/ml in patients with stage I. Conclusion  Preoperative serum CEA is a reliable predictive factor of recurrence after curative surgery in CRC patients and a useful indicator of the optimal treatment after resection, particularly for cases classified as stage II or stage III.     

Can postoperative surveillance with serial CEA immunoscintigraphy detect resectable rectal cancer recurrence and potentially improve tumor-free survival?

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine if postoperative serial monitoring of rectal cancer patients can be performed with an immunoscintigraphic imaging test for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). It was also of interest to assess whether this test, in combination with standard monitoring procedures used in an intensive surveillance plan, can result in the identification of surgically salvageable patients. STUDY DESIGN: Forty consecutive resected Dukes' B and C rectal cancer patients underwent a prospective, single-institution, surveillance trial of physical examination (including digital rectal examination), endoscopy, CT of the abdomen and pelvis, liver ultrasound, chest x-ray, blood CEA, and CEA immunoscintigraphy with arcitumomab (CEA-Scan, Immunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ) every 6 months for the first 2 years and every 12 months for the next 3 years after initial operation. Outcomes were compared with those from a similar group of 69 patients treated previously at the same institution but without CEA imaging. RESULTS: A total of 219 CEA imaging studies were performed without any significant adverse effects or immune responses, and resulted in lesion sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 94.1%, 97.5%, 97.3%, 76.2%, and 99.5%, respectively. Of the 40 patients, 16 developed 22 surgically confirmed local or distant recurrences, and CEA imaging correctly disclosed 82% of these lesions pre-operatively. All of the patients found to have recurrences had at least one tumor site by CEA imaging; only 6 of 16 had elevated blood CEA titers. On a patient-basis, there was a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 79.2%, an accuracy of 87.5%, and positive and negative predictive values of 76.2% and 100%, respectively. The potential therapeutic benefit of serial arcitumomab imaging is suggested by the fact that 6 of 16 patients (37.5%) with recurrence underwent potentially curative second-look operations, compared with 6 of 69 (8.7%) of a comparable population studied at this institution during an earlier 6-year period, using all of the same tests except CEA imaging. None of the patients in this historic control group survived more than 21 months, although the mean survival of the six patients resected for cure in the study population was 35 months (range 11 to 69 months). During 6 years of followup, three of the six re-resected patients eventually died of cancer recurrence, two died from other causes (and were confirmed by necropsy to be tumor-free), and one patient is still free of disease in the sixth year. CEA scanning appeared to be more predictive of recurrence than blood CEA testing or other diagnostic modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Arcitumomab inclusion in intensive surveillance of patients with resected rectal cancer can disclose tumor recurrence at a stage that allowed surgical salvage therapy in 37.5% of the 16 patients with recurrence who had second-look surgery, and in 19% the patients were free of disease during longterm followup. This pilot study suggests that a randomized prospective trial comparing standard surveillance procedures to the use of CEA imaging added thereto should be undertaken.     

Local recurrence after radical surgery for colorectal cancer

Local recurrence of colorectal cancer after curative surgery is a major clinical problem. The aim of our study was to present our experience in this field. Between January 1990 and December 2000, 572 patients underwent resection for colorectal cancer in our department; 66 of them had local recurrence within the first 2 years. Most of those patients had Dukes' stage B (n = 24) or stage C (n = 37) tumors, which were located mainly in the rectum (n = 40) and sigmoid colon (n = 18). The incidence of local recurrence was 11% and 15.9% for tumors that were Dukes' stages B and C, respectively. Thirty-five of 66 patients received palliative treatment, and 28 of them died within 9 months. The remaining 31 patients underwent radical excision of the recurrent tumor: 11 of these patients died within 2 years, and 20 were still alive after 30 months. The only hope for long-term survival for patients presenting with local recurrence from colorectal cancer after primary radical treatment is to identify local recurrence at an early stage and treat it in a radical manner.     

A small rise in CEA is sensitive for recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: Rise in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) above normal limits can indicate recurrent colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a small rise in CEA, even within normal limits was a sensitive indicator of recurrence. METHOD: 150 patients aged 22-87 years were followed up for a mean of 27 months after colorectal surgery with CEA 3 and 6 monthly computerized tomography. We analysed whether a rise in CEA > 1 ng/ml correlated with recurrence of metastases. RESULTS: Forty-six of 139 patients in final analysis had recurrent disease. A rise in CEA > 1 had a predictive value of 74% for recurrence or metastases (sensitivity 80%, specificity 86%). These findings were similar whether or not the CEA was normal preoperatively. CONCLUSION: If CEA is measured after surgery for colorectal cancer, a rise of >1 in the patient's postoperative value is predictive for recurrence or metastases with an overall sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 86%. Previous studies have recognized the role of large rises in CEA in predicting recurrence but this study shows that small changes in CEA may be significant even if these levels would be traditionally within 'normal' limits.     

Langzeitergebnisse nach laparoskopischer Resektion colorectaler Carcinome

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques are currently used for curative resection of colorectal cancer although long-term results from controlled clinical trials are not available yet that prove laparoscopic procedures are adequate. METHODS: All patients who under-went a curative resection of a colorectal tumor from 1995 to 1997 were included in a prospective cohort study to evaluate the short- and long-term results. RESULTS: Laparoscopic colorectal resections were accomplished in 68 patients. In only 3 patients was an adenoma (stage 0) found, and 10 patients had multiple liver metastases at the time of palliative resection. An oncological resection was performed in 55 patients. The average age was 62.8 +/- 14.6 years (29 female and 26 male patients). Eleven right colectomies, 1 left colectomy, 21 sigmoid resections, 16 proctosigmoidectomies and 6 abdominoperineal resections were carried out. Two patients (3.6%) were lost during follow-up. The median follow-up was 27.1 months (range 9.1-45.1 months). No port-site metastases were found. Two patients who are still alive after sigmoid resection suffered from a recurrence. The first patient underwent only limited lymphadenectomy because of synchronous malignant lymphoma. The second patient developed bilateral lung metastases. Only one patient died during the follow-up period because of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Although the follow-up is short, it seems that the recurrence rate is low. Controlled multicenter clinical trials are currently performed to evaluate whether laparoscopic surgery is really adequate to treat colorectal cancer.     

Pre- and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen determinations in hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Predictive value and implications for adjuvant treatment based on multivariate analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of pre- and postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the resectional treatment of colorectal hepatic metastases. The main question was whether postoperative CEA levels correlated with survival and the time to recurrence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite numerous investigations on prognostic factors in colorectal cancer, only sparse data are available to estimate the patient's individual risk for tumor recurrence postoperatively. It is controversial whether preoperative CEA values are of prognostic significance, and after observing the kinetics of CEA decline, elevated CEA levels postoperatively were found to be an ominous sign. CEA therefore could indicate the presence of a tumor burden after resection. METHODS: One hundred sixty-six patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal metastases with curative intent were prospectively documented and underwent multivariate analysis for indicators of prognosis. RESULTS: Abnormal preoperative CEA levels were not of prognostic significance compared with values within the normal range (survival, 36 vs. 30 months; p = 0.12; disease-free survival, 12 vs. 10 months; p = 0.82). The postoperative serum CEA level, however, was the most predictive factor with regard to survival and the disease-free interval. Patients in whom CEA levels were abnormal before surgery and returned into the normal range after resection had significantly better survival times (37 vs. 23 months, p = 0.0001) and disease-free survival times (12 vs. 6.2 months, p = 0.0001) compared with patients with persistently abnormal values. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and postoperative determination of the serum CEA level is mandatory to judge whether a curative resection has been performed and whether tumor has been left behind after the operation. Postoperative CEA levels also should be used as a stratification criterion in adjuvant treatment studies after hepatic resection to indicate patients with a high risk of tumor recurrence.     

Recurrence and Survival Outcomes after Hepatic Resection with or without Cryotherapy for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma

Background Some reports support resection combined with cryotherapy for patients with multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) that would otherwise be ineligible for curative treatments. This series demonstrates long-term results of 415 patients with CRLM who underwent resection with or without cryotherapy. Methods Between April 1990 and January 2006, 291 patients were treated with resection only and 124 patients with combined resection and cryotherapy. Recurrence and survival outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were used to identify significant prognostic indicators for survival. Results Median length of follow-up was 25 months (range 1–124 months). The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 3.1%. Overall median survival was 32 months (range 1–124 months), with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival values of 85%, 45% and 29%, respectively. The overall recurrence rates were 66% and 78% for resection and resection/cryotherapy groups, respectively. For the resection group, the median survival was 34 months, with 1-, 3- and 5- year survival values of 88%, 47% and 32%, respectively. The median survival for the resection/cryotherapy group was 29 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival values of 84%, 43% and 24%, respectively (P = 0.206). Five factors were independently associated with an improved survival: absence of extrahepatic disease at diagnosis, well- or moderately-differentiated colorectal cancer, largest lesion size being 4 cm or less, a postoperative CEA of 5 ng/ml or less and absence of liver recurrence. Conclusions Long-term survival results of resection combined with cryotherapy for multiple bilobar CRLM are comparable to that of resection alone in selected patients.     

Acute-phase protein response, survival and tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION: An acute-phase protein response (APPR) has been associated with reduced crude survival rates and increased recurrence following apparently curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. This study investigated the prognostic significance of a preoperative and postoperative APPR in relation to disease-specific mortality rate. METHODS: Some 202 patients with colorectal cancer were followed for at least 5 years. C-reactive protein concentration, measured before and at 3 months after operation, was used as an index of the APPR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on a number of potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: Thirty-six per cent of patients had an APPR and this was associated with a higher rate of local tumour invasion, fewer curative resections and a higher carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration. There was no difference in Dukes' stage between patients with or without an APPR. The most important prognostic factor related to both disease-specific and crude survival was Duke's stage (P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that APPR had prognostic significance only in patients with advanced disease (P = 0.013). An APPR was present in a minority of patients (11 per cent) after operation and was not associated with increased likelihood of tumour recurrence. CONCLUSION: The APPR is increased in more than a third of patients presenting with colorectal cancer and is associated with more frequent local tumour invasion, fewer curative resections and a higher CEA level. An APPR at 3 months after operation does not have the prognostic significance reported by earlier studies.     

Clinical value of carcinoembryonic antigen: diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of patients with cancer.

Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in nanograms per milliliter was assayed in 149 patients with benign and 567 patients with malignant disease. Elevated CEA level (greater than 5.0) was a good indicator of malignant disease but a poor screening test for cancer because of the high false-negative rate. Degree of elevation of plasma CEA level correlated with incidence of metastatic disease in patients with colorectal, gastric, and breast carcinomas, but no correlation was seen between CEA levels and status of lymph nodes in patients with localized disease. Patients with localized colorectal cancer, but elevated CEA levels before resection, had a 2.1-fold increase in the incidence of recurrence; however, this added to the prognostic value of Dukes' staging only when the CEA level remained elevated postoperatively. In 87% of patients with colorectal cancer, the CEA level was elevated at the time of recurrence, but a therapeutic value of reexploration for unexplained CEA level elevation was not confirmed.     

Slope analysis of the postoperative CEA time course and its possible application as an aid in diagnosis of disease progression in gastrointestinal cancer

The postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) time courses of patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract were analyzed to establish a possible correlation with distinct types of disease progression. The diagnosis of tumor progression was obtained by second-look surgery, and in some cases by other clinical diagnostic procedures. In thirty-one of thirty-four patients studied, tumor progression correlated with increasing CEA levels. The calculation of the slopes of the CEA increase in the computerized CEA surveillance diagrams represented a parameter that discriminated between local tumor recurrence and widespread tumor dissemination. All localized tumor recurrences exhibited a flat slope in the range of 0.08 to 0.30 ng CEA increase/ml serum within ten days, with a mean value of 0.17 ng/ml in ten days. The CEA slopes in cases of liver metastases were relatively steep and ranged from 0.9 to 3.8 ng/ml in ten days, yielding a mean slope of 2.2 ng CEA increase/ml serum in ten days.     

Patterns of failure after surgical cure of large liver tumors: A change in the proximate cause of death and a need for effective systemic adjuvant therapy

During a period of 7 years, we have aggressively treated liver tumors whether primary or metastatic. Our experience after 43 curative major liver resections has shown an excellent overall survival: 34 of 43 patients still alive a median of 12 months after liver resection (patient ages ranged from 21 to 85 years, median 57 years). Nineteen patients underwent right hepatic lobectomy, 9 trisegmentectomy, 5 left hepatic lobectomy, 5 extended left hepatic lobectomy, 4 right lobectomy plus left lobe wedge resection, and 1 patient underwent a major hilar wedge resection. Two patients died from sepsis and hepatic failure on or before the 60th postoperative day. One patient with no evidence of recurrent colorectal cancer was lost to follow-up after 2.5 years. One patient died without cancer 12 months after left hepatic lobectomy for colon cancer metastases. Cumulative survival for the entire series and for patients after resection of colorectal cancer metastases was the same: 1 year survival 90 percent; 2 year survival 75 percent, and 3 year survival 65 percent. Seventeen of 30 patients remain disease-free after resection of liver metastases. Of the 13 who had recurrence, 8 are still alive. Ten recurrences were outside of the residual liver (predominantly multiple pulmonary metastases). One recurrence was in the right hemidiaphragm, and only three were in the residual or regenerated liver. Serial carcinoembryonic antigen analysis was the best indicator of recurrence in these 13 patients, 12 of whom were asymptomatic. These data confirm that major liver resection can be performed with minimum postoperative mortality (4.7 percent in this series). More importantly, the majority of patients were cured of their liver metastases. The next goal should be the initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy trials after liver resection in such patients.     

CRYOTHERAPY OF THE RESECTION EDGE AFTER LIVER RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL CANCER METASTASES

Background : An involved or inadequate (< 1 cm) resection margin is associated with a high rate of local tumour recurrence and reduced survival rates after liver resection for colorectal metastases. This paper assesses whether or not hepatic cryotherapy of the resection edge is suitable to improve local disease control. Methods : From April 1990 to May 1997, we performed cryotherapy of the resection edge in 44 patients after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with an involved or inadequate resection margin. The reasons for performing edge cryotherapy instead of extension of resection were: proximity of hepatic veins or portal sheath (n= 12); avoidance of extended left or right hemihepatectomy (n= 15); inadequate liver tissue reserve after resection (n= 16); and patient unfit to undergo further major resection (n= 1). Histological examination showed the resection margin to be involved in 24 patients and close (< 1 cm) in 20 patients. Results : Two patients died after surgery. Morbidity consisted of intra-abdominal collections (n= 6), postoperative bleeding (n= 1), wound infection (n= 1) and transient liver failure (n= 1). At a median follow-up of 19 months, 16 patients are alive and disease-free, 26 patients developed recurrence and 15 of them died. Nineteen patients developed recurrence which involved the liver but only five of these were at the resection edge. Median overall and liver disease-free survival was 33 and 23 months, respectively. Conclusions : Cryotherapy of the resection edge after resection of colorectal liver metastases with involved or inadequate resection margins considerably improves local disease control and may allow a greater proportion of patients with liver metastases to undergo potentially curative treatment.     

Multivariate analysis of recurrence after anterior resection for colorectal carcinoma

We performed a multivariate analysis of survival data from 278 patients who underwent potentially curative anterior resection with hand-sewn anastomosis for nonobstructing colorectal carcinoma to evaluate the interaction of the resection margin with distance from the anal verge and their contributions to local and distant recurrence. Cumulative 5-year disease-free survival was 66 percent for the 258 patients with complete follow-up. Forty-nine patients (19 percent) had local recurrence and 42 (16 percent) developed initial distant metastases. Local recurrence rates increased with increasing age and with more advanced Dukes' stage. It developed in twice as many patients with colostomies as without colostomies. Distant metastases developed significantly more often in patients with nodal involvement and in patients with resection margins exceeding 3.5 cm. Forty-four percent of patients with lesions within 14 cm of the anal verge resected with margins of at least 3.5 cm developed distant recurrence. This study suggests that aggressive pelvic dissection to achieve resection margins greater than 3.5 cm may contribute to tumor dissemination and subsequent distant metastases.