Midterm results of two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic shoulder infection

BackgroundTo our knowledge, no studies have reported clinical results at a midterm follow-up after two-stage revision for periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI). Our purpose was to determine the recurrent infection rate and clinical outcomes of two-stage revision for PSI at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The secondary aim was to evaluate the application of the new guidelines from the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) in 2018 for diagnosis of PSI in this cohort.MethodsWe identified 17 patients with infection after shoulder arthroplasty between 2005 and 2014 who were treated with a two-stage revision and had a minimum follow-up of 5 years (range, 5-9 years). The mean time from the involved arthroplasty to first-stage revision was 40 months. All patients were revised to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty at second-stage revision. Complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), visual analogue scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score, and range of motion (ROM) were noted. Patients were retrospectively scored and categorized using the ICM 2018 diagnostic criteria. Mean patient age was 64 ± 7 years, and 65% of patients were male.ResultsA recurrent infection developed in 3 (18%) of the 17 patients. The cumulative incidence of recurrence of infection was 0% at 1 year, 6% at 2 years, and 18% at 5 years. There were 6 (36%) other complications, including 4 periprosthetic fractures, 1 spacer fracture, and 1 dislocation. Two (12%) patients had scapular notching. At latest follow-up, patients who did not have recurrent infection had a statistically and clinically meaningful improvement from preoperative to postoperative PROs, including VAS for pain, ASES score, SST score, and WOOS score, and active ROM, including abduction and forward flexion. Using the ICM 2018 criteria at first-stage revision surgery, the category of PSI for 10 (59%) patients was “definite PSI,” 4 (23%) patients was “probable PSI”, and 3 (18%) patients was “possible PSI.”ConclusionThe rate of reinfection after a two-stage revision surgery for PSI at midterm follow-up was 18%. Clinical outcomes were favorable in the patients who remained free of infection. Further prospective study of the ICM criteria as they apply to making the diagnosis of infection in these patients would be beneficial.Level of evidenceLevel IV; Case Series; Treatment Study     

Revision surgery in clubfeet.

The reoperated clubfeet of 29 children aged one to 12 years were reviewed. The surgical procedure most often used in revision surgery was recomplete soft-tissue release alone or combined with plantar release, calcaneocuboid fusion, and capsulotomies of the navicular-first cuneiform-first metatarsal joint. In 27 of 29 feet, acceptable results were achieved. Nineteen were excellent and good results. An algorithm that suggests surgical solutions to a variety of clubfoot deformities in different age groups has been developed, as well as an objective rating system, to evaluate the long-term results of revision surgery of clubfeet.     

Midterm outcomes of revision shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundSince the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty, the indications have been expanding. Because of the increasing number of arthroplasty procedures, revision surgeries are also inevitable. The purpose of our study is to delineate a large number of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases treated in different ways, including antibiotic spacer placement (ABX), hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), and to analyze the relationship between preoperative factors and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe reviewed our institution's records of revision shoulder arthroplasty between January 1, 2000, and October 1, 2017. Preoperative information included age at the time of surgery, gender, body mass index, and infection status. Pre- and postoperatively, we gathered 6 patient-reported clinical outcomes and 3 range-of-motion parameters (elevation, abduction, and external rotation). Postoperative complications were also assessed. Then, we examined the differences between the pre- and postoperative outcomes. As a secondary analysis, we performed multivariable regression analysis on the same outcomes, accounting for age at the time of surgery, infection status, and previous surgery type.ResultsAmong the 341 revisions performed, 138 cases met inclusion criteria of at least a 2-year follow-up with pre- and postoperative functional outcome scores. The majority of our revision procedures were to a rTSA (92 cases, 67%), followed by aTSA (28 cases, 20%), and ABX/HA (18 cases, 13%). The mean age at the time of our index surgery was 66 years old. In aTSA and rTSA, all the postoperative outcomes (ie, ASES, Constant, UCLA, SST, SPADI, SF-12 scores, and 3 AROMs) were significantly improved beyond the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) except SF-12 scores in aTSA (P = .25) and active external rotation in rTSA (P = .73). None of the ABX/HA's postoperative outcomes achieve significant improvement or MCID. Multivariable regression analysis showed that older age at the time of surgery was significantly associated with better outcomes in 3 of the 6 patient-reported outcomes (ASES, SST, and SPADI; P = .023, .023, and .028, respectively).ConclusionRevision aTSA and rTSA showed statistically and clinically significant improvement postoperatively. ABX and HA did not achieve meaningful postoperative improvement. Overall, patients getting revision shoulder arthroplasty at an older age had better patient-reported outcomes.Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Cohort Study     

Patient-based outcomes after Ilizarov surgery in resistant clubfeet

We present the results of clinical evaluation and patient-based outcomes after Ilizarov surgery in resistant clubfeet (grade D clubfeet, Dimeglio-Bensahel system). This is a retrospective study of 26 resistant clubfeet in 23 children who were managed by the Ilizarov technique. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was 9 years and the average follow-up period was 47 months. A calcaneal or mid-foot osteotomy followed by bony distraction was undertaken in nine feet and a soft-tissue distraction, with or without soft-tissue release, was undertaken in 17 feet. Clinical evaluation of the degree of correction of the deformity and functional evaluation, using patient-based questionnaires, were used in assessing the outcome in these patients. Patient-based outcomes give useful information about the functional status following surgery, complementing the objective assessment by the surgeon. Clinical evaluation revealed stiff, plantigrade feet in nine patients and a recurrent deformity after initial correction in the remaining 14 patients. The patient-based outcomes were good to excellent in 52% for satisfaction, 57% for cosmesis, 48% for walking and 73% for teasing (made fun of because of the shape of foot), showing that the functional results were better in these patients in spite of a poor surgical outcome.     

Objective measures of gait following revision hip arthroplasty. First medium-term results 2.6 years after surgery

AIM: The purpose of the study was to identify the functional impairments after revision arthroplasty by gait analysis. METHODS: This retrospective study compared 33 patients (mean age 58.5 years) who have undergone revision of an acetabular component (mean follow-up 2.6 years) with a group of normal control subjects. Gait analysis including recording of the three dimensional kinetics and kinematics was performed in all patients. Surface electromyography of seven leg and trunk muscles were registered bilaterally. The vertical ground reaction forces were determined by two force plates. These data were correlated with the Harris Hip Score, the d'Aubigné Score and the radiographic analysis (centre of rotation). RESULTS: The analysis revealed a decreased hip range of motion during gait (p < 0.0001). In the sagittal plane there was a significant decrease in the hip extension at the end of the stance phase (p < 0.0001). The control group reached a mean extension of - 7.6 degrees, the operated patients were limited by the extension deficit (+ 9.1) in step length (p < 0.0016) and velocity (p < 0.0001). Kinetic parameters indicated a reduced hip abductor moment (p < 0.0001). Compensation of gait instability was observed in an extended stance phase (p = 0.0389). The hip muscle activity was increased to stabilize the impaired hip. The changed kinematic parameters are observed with secondary impairments in knee extension and reduced dorsiflexion in ankle motion (p < 0.0001). Neither the Harris Hip score (77.8 points) nor the d'Aubigné score (14.9 points) were associated with the motion analysis (p > 0.05). Deterioration in kinematics are indicated by cranialisation of the centre of rotation (p = 0.18). However, medial movement of the centre of rotation does not influence the kinematic data (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:Despite sufficient satisfactory clinical data the gait analysis confirmed objective impairments of the operated hip and neighboring joints. Gait instability is revealed in a decreased hip extension and deficient hip abduction.     

Midterm results of revisional bariatric surgery postsleeve gastrectomy: resleeve versus bypass

BackgroundBariatric surgery has been shown to produce the most predictable weight loss results, with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) being the most performed procedure as of 2014. However, inadequate weight loss may present the need for a revisional procedure.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic resleeve gastrectomy (LRSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in attaining successful weight loss.SettingPublic hospital following SG.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent SG from 2008–2019. A list was obtained of those who underwent revisional bariatric surgery after initial SG, and their demographic characteristics were analyzed.ResultsA total of 2858 patients underwent SG, of whom 84 patients (3%) underwent either a revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rLRYGB) or LRSG. A total of 82% of the patients were female. The mean weight and body mass index (BMI) before SG for the LRSG and rLRYGB patients were 136.7 kg and 49.9 kg/m² and 133.9 kg and 50.5 kg/m², respectively. The mean BMI showed a drop from 42.0 to 31.7 (P < .001) 1 year post revisional surgery for the LRSG group and 42.7 to 34.5 (P < .001) for the rLRYGB group, correlating to an excess weight loss (EWL) of 61.7% and 48.1%, respectively. At 5 years post revisional surgery, LRSG patients showed an increase in BMI to 33.8 (EWL = 45.3%), while those who underwent rLRYGB showed a decrease to 34.3 (EWL = 49.2%). Completeness of follow-up at 1, 3, and 5 years for rLRYGB and LRSG were 67%, 35%, and 24% and 45%, 21%, and 18%, respectively.ConclusionsRevisional bariatric surgery is a safe and effective method for the management of failed primary SG. LRSG patients tended to do better earlier on; however, it leveled off with those who underwent rLRYGB by 5 years.     

Midterm results of femoral impaction bone grafting with an allograft combined with hydroxyapatite in revision total hip arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of femoral impaction bone grafting with an allograft combined with hydroxyapatite (HA). Fifty-four consecutive femoral reconstructions that were performed with the use of frozen morselized allografts and HA were followed up retrospectively. The average follow-up period was 92 months. A femoral head and HA were mixed and used as allograft. The average Merle d'Aubigné clinical score improved from 8.9 preoperatively to 13.1 points postoperatively. Stem subsidence was seen in 26 hips; however, it was not progressive after 1 year postoperatively. Cortical repair was detected at an average of 7 months postoperatively. Impaction bone grafting with an allograft combined with HA provided favorable results, with bone remodeling and less subsidence.     

全髋关节翻修术中骨缺损的重建

目的观察异体骨移植在全髋关节翻修术中骨缺损重建的临床价值。方法对1996年6月～2000年12月收治的19例全髋关节翻修术的患者进行回顾性分析,其中男11例,平均年龄66.5岁,女8例,平均年龄63.2岁。髋臼骨缺损类型为Ⅰ型2髋,Ⅱ型10髋,Ⅲ型4髋;股骨骨缺损类型为Ⅰ型3髋,Ⅱ型11髋,Ⅲ型2髋;髋臼及股骨无明显缺损患者4例。骨缺损重建方法包括髋臼结构性植骨3例,髋臼内压紧颗粒骨植骨3例,髋臼内金属网垫植骨3例,髋臼、股骨压紧颗粒骨植骨6例7髋,股骨结构性植骨3例,金属网加强颗粒骨植骨2例,股骨压紧颗粒骨植骨4例,4例患者未行植骨。应用Harris评分标准及X线分别评价翻修术后临床转归及移植骨愈合情况。结果19例患者平均随访46个月(6～68个月),随访患者的Harris评分由翻修术前的平均42.7分(24～59分)增至术后的平均82.7分(55～99分),15例16髋异体骨植骨患者X线片显示1例髋臼结构性植骨部分吸收,髋臼松动,须行翻修术;1例髋臼松动,无症状;3例有X线透亮带。无感染发生。结论全髋关节翻修术中,根据骨缺损类型,选用相应的异体骨移植是一种可靠而有效的方法。     

Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup

Revision of an acetabular component in a patient who has severe periacetabular bone loss is a complex problem, particularly when there is not enough bone stock to allow placement of an acetabular component near the normal anatomical hip center. To fill the defect, a valuable option for revision arthroplasty is the cementless oblong revision cup (LOR). METHODS: 50 consecutive revisions of the acetabular component were performed in 48 patients. The mean age at the time of revision was sixty-one years (range, thirty-three to seventy-eight years). Forty-eight hips were available for follow-up, at a mean of thirty-two months (range, eighteen to sixty-one months). The acetabular defect classified according to Paprosky, the migration and the radiolucencies were followed radiologically. RESULTS: 8 hips (16 %) were revised again: two because of infection (4 %) and six because of instability (12 %). The revised hips are not associated to the preoperative degree of acetabular defect (34 % defect type III) (P > 0.05). The mean Harris Hip score was corrected from 36.5 (range, 7.5 to 92.5) to 78.2 points (range, 47.6 to 97.6) (P < 0.01). The mean d'Aubigné Score was corrected from 8.3 (range, 4 to 6) to 15 points (range, 10 to 18) (P < 0.01). Neither pre- nor postoperative results were associated to the degree of acetabular defect (P > 0.05). However, patients with multiple revisions had a significantly reduced clinical outcome than patients with the first revision (P < 0.05). The hip center of rotation, cranially placed to the contralateral side (0.92 cm) was corrected by the revision to a more normal anatomic rotation center (0.27 cm). Partial zonal radiolucencies, always smaller than 1.5 mm were seen in 30 % of the patients. The mean migration of the acetabular component was not significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The authors support the use of the cementless oblong revision cup if contact can be made with host bone to more than 50 %. If this is not possible, acetabular bone reconstruction combined with a roof ring and a cemented cup is the component of choice.     

Classification of results of treatment of congenital clubfeet]

The paper presents the comparison of late results of surgical treatment of congenital clubfeet using a number of assessment classifications. 61 feet in 46 patients treated between 1979-1990 with a mean follow-up time of 15.7 years. Strong correlations were noted between the various classifications, but none was found "ideal" or particularly useful in everyday clinical practice.     

Remission rate of implant-related infections following revision surgery after fractures

Purpose

In contrast to a large amount of epidemiological data regarding the incidence of implant infections after fracture management, surprisingly few have been published concerning the success of their treatment.

Methods

This was a single-centre cohort study at Geneva University Hospitals from 2000 to 2012 investigating the remission rates of orthopaedic implant infections after fracture repair and associated variables.

Results

A total of 139 episodes were included: There were 51 women (37 %) and 28 immunosuppressed (20 %) patients with a median age and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score of 51 years and 2 points, respectively. The infected implants were plates (n?=?75, 54 %), nails (24, 17 %), wires (20), screws (10), cerclage cables or wires (3), hip screws (4) or material for spondylodesis (3). A pathogen was identified in 135 (97 %) cases, including Staphylococcus aureus (73, 52 %), coagulase-negative staphylococci (20), streptococci (7) and 19 Gram-negative rods. All patients underwent antibiotic treatment, and 128 (92 %) remained in remission at a median follow-up time of 2.6 years (range one to 13 years). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the plate infections were significantly associated with lower remission rates [65/75, 87 %, odds ratio (OR) 0.1, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.90]. No associations were found for gender, age, immune status, ASA score, additional surgical interventions (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.1–4.1) or duration of antibiotic treatment (OR 1.0, 95 % CI 0.98–1.01).

Conclusions

Among all infected and removed orthopaedic implants, plates were associated with slightly lower remission rates, while the overall treatment success exceeded 90 %. The duration of antibiotic therapy did not alter the outcome.     

Midterm results of Oxford shoulder hemiarthroplasty

Background:

Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder is known to provide satisfactory long term results provided concentric reduction can be obtained in a high percentage of patients. Careful soft tissue balancing with appropriate adaptation of version of the component appears to allow good results permitting centering of the arthroplasty without replacement of a glenoid component.

Materials and Methods:

29 consecutive patients (30 shoulders) who underwent Oxford cementless shoulder hemiarthroplasty between 2004 and 2006 were analyzed. Mean age was 71 years (range 34-91 years, 95% of the confidence interval [CI] of standard deviation [SD] was 10.32-17.58). Mean duration of preoperative symptoms was 42.8 months (range 9-84 months, 95% CI of SD was 17.83-30.11). Patients’ self reported Oxford shoulder score (OSS) was collected prospectively and was used as an assessment tool to measure final outcome.

Results:

The mean initial OSS was 17.9 (range 7-43, 95% CI of the SD was 7.19-12.13). The score improved by an average of 16.9 points at a mean followup of 5.9 years (range 4.3-7.6 years) to reach mean final OSS of 34.8 (range 13-48, 95% CI of the SD was 9.31-15.73). The improvement of OSS was highly significant with a two tailed P < 0.0001 and 95% CI of this difference was 11.47-22.20.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates shoulder hemiarthroplasty as reliable procedure for improvement of shoulder function as shown by the patients’ self reported outcome score (OSS) in end stage glenohumeral arthritis with intact or reparable rotator cuff at midterm followup. Our results suggest successful outcome of the Oxford shoulder hemiarthroplasty (Corin, UK) away from its originating center and in hospitals where fewer shoulder replacements are performed.     

Midterm results of mobile-bearing knee replacements

We examined the clinical and radiographic results of 93 patients affected by knee arthritis or osteonecrosis subjected to unilateral cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with the LCS prothesis (Depuy/Johnson & Johnson). The mean follow-up was 9.5 years (range, 7–12 years). Clinical evaluation was performed using the Knee Society rating system, while radiographic evaluation was done according to the Knee Society roentgenographic system. At the latest follow-up, the mean knee score was 87 points: the functional score improved from 40 to 90. Radiolucent lines were small and not progressive. The implant survival at 12 years was 88%. Six knees (7%) required revision for implant-related problems. We conclude that the mobile-bearing prosthesis is a successful device even at long-term follow-up.