Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM 2)

AIM: FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia. CONCLUSION: FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.     

A phase II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gemcitabine has been the standard regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer, but the effect on the response rate and survival is still disappointing, leading to many trials of combination chemotherapy. 5-FU and cisplatin were combined with gemcitabine in this trial, as they are synergistic with gemcitabine and each other as well. This study was aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-FU, and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were entered into this study. Gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 3 for 72 hours, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 2, 24 hours after the start of gemcitabine were administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From December 2001 to January 2004, twenty patients were enrolled in this study. Among 17 of these patients assessable, 3 patients had a partial remission with the response rate of 23.6% (95% confidence interval, 6.2-41.0%). The median time to disease progression was 230 days and median duration of survival was 322 days. Among total of 91 cycles, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 12 cycles (13.2%), 12 cycles (13.2%), and 23 cycles (24.4%), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis developed at 2 cycles (2.2%), and nausea and vomiting were encountered in 3 cycles (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-FU, and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer is active and well-tolerated, warranting a phase III study.     

Gemcitabine alone versus combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of multicenter study

The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer is of advanced disease. Several randomized Phase II and III trials suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) response rates were higher than Gemcitabine (Gem) alone, however the trials were not enough powered to indicate a statistically significant prolongation of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluated the efficiency of Gem alone versus GemCis in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma .A total of 406 patients, from fourteen centers were evaluated retrospectively. All patients received Gem or GemCis as first-line treatment between September 2005 to March 2011. Primary end of this study were to evaluate the toxicity, clinical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the arms. There were 156 patients (M: 98, F: 58) in Gem arm and 250 patients (M: 175, F: 75) in the combination arm. Gemcitabin arm patients older than the combination arm ( median 63 vs 57.5, p=0.001). In patients with the combination arm had a higher dose reduction (25.2% vs 11.3%, p=0.001) and dose delay (34% vs 16.8%, p=0.001). Among patients with the combination and Gemcitabin arm gender, diabetes mellitus, performance status, cholestasis, grade, stage did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Clinical response rate to the combination arm was higher than the Gem arm (69.0% vs 49.7%, p=0.001). PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance (8.9 vs 6.0, p=0.08). OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm (12.0 vs 10.2, p>0.05). Grade III-IV hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were higher in the combination arm. PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance. OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is widely used in clinical practice, despite a lack of prospective data to validate its efficacy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We conducted a phase II study of GnP for LAPC to assess its efficacy and safety.We performed a single-arm, single-institution study with GnP in 24 patients with LAPC. The treatment protocol included successive administration of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m²). The primary endpoint was the tumor overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs).The median PFS was 11.0 months, median OS was 21.2 months, ORR was 62.5%, and 37.5% of the patients had stable disease. Four (16.7%) of the patients were converted to surgical resection; 3 of these achieved R0 resection. Grade 3 to 4 AEs included hematological (neutropenia, 64%; thrombocytopenia, 12%), nonhematological (cholangitis, 16%), and sensory neuropathy (4%). These AEs were manageable and tolerable.The GnP treatment in patients with LAPC showed favorable tumor shrinkage, good toxicity profile, and enabled conversion to surgical resection in a subset of patients; therefore, GnP is an option for first-line chemotherapy in patients with LAPC.     

Gemcitabine and protracted 5-FU for advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase II study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer procures dismal results, both 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine have shown a modest activity. We report a phase II study of gemcitabine combined with protracted 5-fluorouracil. METHODOLOGY: Gemcitabine was given at 1000 mg/m2/week intravenously, in combination with concomitant 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day as a protracted venous infusion, both 3 out of 4 weeks in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled, among whom 27 were metastatic. Response rate, overall and progression-free survival were endpoints, as well as tolerance and clinical benefit. RESULTS: We observed 3 (10%) partial responses, and 12 (42%) stabilizations within which the median disease control was 5.6 months. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 2.8 and 4 months, respectively. A clinical benefit was observed in 39% of patients. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, but no grade 4 was observed. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: This combination chemotherapy was well tolerated in advanced pancreatic cancer patients.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the response rates of a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Indian patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the toxicity, time to progressive disease and overall survival for this combination. Chemonaive patients with histopathologically proven, bidimensionally measurable, stage Ill or IV unresectable HCC were enrolled into this study. All the patients were required to have a Zubrod's performance status not greater than 2, should not have undergone prior radiotherapy and were required to have adequate major organ function. Patients received gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 to 60 min) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 intravenously over 2 hours) on day land every 21 days. Response assessment was done by a Computed Tomography scan after every two cycles of chemotherapy. From May to December 1999, 30 patients were enrolled in the study; they were all eligible for efficacy and toxicity analysis. Six (20%) patients achieved a partial response and 13 (43%) patients demonstrated stable disease with 11 (37%) patients showing disease progression. The median time to progression was 18 weeks (range 1 to 74 weeks) and the median duration of response was 13 weeks (range 4 to 68 weeks). The 1-year survival rate was 27% and the median overall survival was 21 weeks (95% CI: 17 to 43 weeks). WHO grade 3 and 4 anemia was seen in 11 (37%) and 2 (7%) patients, respectively. Four (13%) patients each experienced grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 2 (7%) patients each. Major, non-hematologic toxicities were grade 4 elevated bilirubin levels and grade 3 oral toxicity, in 1 patient (3%) each. This regimen was well tolerated and did show activity in Indian patients with advanced unresectable HCC. There is a need to further evaluate this combination in order to define its role in the treatment of HCC.     

Fludarabine combined with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC lung carcinoma: a phase I study

Background and purpose

Fludarabine is an adenine nucleoside analogue that has significant activity in hematological malignancies and has shown promising activity in combination with radiation in preclinical solid tumor models. We designed a phase I trial exploring concurrent fludarabine and radiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of fludarabine given with concurrent irradiation.

Materials and methods

Thirteen patients with stage IIIB NSCLC received thoracic irradiation of 60?Gy. Fludarabine was administered during the 5th and 6th week of radiotherapy. Doses started at 10?mg/m² per day and increased by steps of 3?mg/m² per day.

Results

At a daily dose of 16?mg/m², one out of six patients developed a grade 4 leukopenia, and one a grad 3 pneumonitis. Further grade III toxicity was not observed. The dose of 13?mg/m² was identified as the MTD. All patients developed a fludarabine dose-dependent lymphocytopenia.

Conclusion

Fludarabine can be safely administered concurrently with radiation at a daily dose of 13?mg/m² during the final 2?weeks of radiotherapy. Further prospective clinical studies are required to establish the potential role of concurrent fludarabine and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced inoperable NSCLC.     

Palliative second-line treatment with oxaliplatin,gemcitabine and weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil as 24-h infusion in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The most commonly used treatment in the palliative first-line therapy of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the Gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy, while several combination therapies are currently being tested in clinical trials. With regard to pancreatic cancer, a palliative second-line therapy has not been established, yet. The four patients presented in this paper received a palliative second-line therapy with Oxaliplatin (L-OHP), Gem and high-dose 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as a 24-h infusion after a first-line therapy with Gem and weekly high-dose 5-FU as a 24-h infusion. During second-line therapy, four patients received 67 chemotherapy applications, which were well tolerated. As severe symptom of toxicity, thrombocytopenia (CTC toxicity grade 4) was observed in one patient. As a result of second-line therapy, stable disease (SD) with a significant decrease of CA 19 - 9 was achieved in three patients and partial remission (PR) in one patient. After palliative first- and second-line treatment the survival time of the patients was 9, 9, 15 and 20 months. Currently, a multicentre phase I study has been started aiming at an optimisation of the three-drug combination dosage.     

Nal-IRI/LV5-FU versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESIRI)-PRODIGE 62: A multicentre,randomised, non-comparative phase II study

Half of patients newly diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) have metastatic disease (mESCC) and therefore a poor prognosis. Furthermore, half of patients with initial loco-regional disease present disease recurrence after surgery and/or chemoradiation. In mESCC, the recommended first-line treatment combines 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, although this has not been validated by a phase III trial. Patients with disease progression or recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy and good performance status probably benefit from second-line chemotherapy. Several molecules have been evaluated in phase I/II trials or retrospective studies (docetaxel, paclitaxel and irinotecan) but no randomised studies are available.OESIRI is a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase II trial designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-FU versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with mESCC. The main inclusion criteria are histologically proven mESCC in progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with initial resectable disease can be included if recurrence occurred within 6 months.The primary objective is to evaluate the percentage of patients alive 9 months after randomisation. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, safety and quality of life. In addition, circulating tumour DNA will be monitored to assess its prognostic value.     

A phase I/II trial of TAC-101, an oral synthetic retinoid, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose  Preclinical models showed TAC-101 (4-[3,5-bis(trimethylsilyl) benzamide] benzoic acid), an oral synthetic retinoid, has anti-tumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase I/II study was performed in advanced HCC patients (pts). Patients and methods  Thirty-three patients were enrolled. During Phase I, pts received 40 mg daily for 14 days q3 weeks; 2 of 5 patients developed DLT so dose was reduced to 20 mg/day. Twenty-eight patients received 20 mg/day. Results  No pt had a CR or PR, but 12 of 21 (57%) had SD. Two pts (9.5%) had late PR after discontinuing TAC-101. Median survival (MS) for all 28 pts treated with 20 mg/day was 12.7 months (95% CI 8.8–22.7); MS for 21 evaluable pts was 19.2 months (95% CI 10.4–27.6). Conclusions  20 mg of TAC- was well tolerated. Significant disease stabilization (12/21 pts, 57%), 2 late PRs, and prolonged MS (19.2 months) suggest that TAC-101 provides meaningful patient benefit.     

奥沙利铂联合甲酰四氢叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶和联合希罗达两周方案治疗晚期胃癌的研究

目的 观察奥沙利铂联合甲酰四氢叶酸钙和氟尿嘧啶(FOLFOX4)与联合希罗达(XELOX)两周方案在晚期胃癌中的疗效和不良反应.方法晚期胃癌患者52例,FOLFOX4化疗22例,XELOX两周方案化疗30例,均于化疗2个疗程后评价疗效,并于1个月后确认,对比其疗效和毒副反应.结果 FOLFOX4方案组总有效率为40.9%,XELOX方案组总有效率为46.7%,两组间比较无明显差异.不良反应主要为外周神经毒性、骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐和腹泻,多为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度,XELOX组手足综合征发生率明显高于FOLFOX4组,但都为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度.结论FOLFOX4和XELOX两周方案治疗晚期胃癌均有较好的疗效,毒副反应均可以耐受.     

A phase I dose escalation study of oral bexarotene in combination with intravenous decitabine in patients with AML

The response rate of non‐M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to all trans retinoic acid has been limited. Using Affymetrix expression arrays, we found that in diverse AML blasts RXRA was expressed at higher levels than RARA and that mouse Ctsg‐PML‐RARA leukemia responded to bexarotene, a ligand for RXRA. We therefore performed a phase I study of combination bexarotene and decitabine in elderly and relapsed AML patients. We found that this combination was well tolerated, although outcomes were modest (1 CRi, and 3 PR among 19 patients). Correlative studies found that patients with clinical response had increased differentiation to bexarotene both in vivo and ex vivo, suggesting that pre‐treatment analysis might identify a more susceptible subgroup of patients. Am. J. Hematol. 89:E103–E108, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Chronomodulated chemotherapy in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer combining 5-FU and sodium folinate with oxaliplatin,irinotecan or gemcitabine: the Jena experience in 79 patients

PURPOSE: To study efficacy and tolerability of chronomodulated (CM)-chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced tumors of the GI tract. Furthermore, calcium folinate was replaced by sodium folinate due to better feasibility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 79 patients with metastatic or locally advanced colorectal cancer ( n=52), cancer of the pancreas/biliary tract ( n=14), and other malignancies ( n=14) with a total of 592 courses of CM-therapy. Out of the total study population 53/79, i.e., 67.1% had received prior chemotherapy. Most of the patients (77.2%) received sodium-folinate-5-FU-oxaliplatin-CM (SOFOX-CM) as first-line chronomodulated therapy, 20.3% received sodium-folinate-5-FU-irinotecan-CM (SOFIRI-CM), and 2.5% ( n=1) received sodium-folinate-5-FU-gemcitabine-CM (SOFGEM-CM). RESULTS: We found a moderate overall toxicity with grade 3-4 neuropathy in 7.46% of patients during a total of 433 courses of SOFOX-CM and grade 3-4 diarrhea in 10.26% of patients after 154 courses of SOFIRI-CM. SOFOX-CM had to be stopped only in one patient due to grade 3-4 sensory neuropathy. CM-therapy led to complete response (CR) in 1.3%, partial response (PR) in 15.2%, stable disease (SD) in 32.9%, and progressive disease (PD) in 44.3% of all patients. For the 26 chemonaive patients remission data were as follows: CR one patient (3.8%), PR four patients (15.4%), SD seven patients (26.9%), PD 12 patients (46.3%), lost to follow-up one patient (3.8%), and too-early-for-analysis one patient (3.8%). The median progression-free-survival (PFS) was 4 months (range, 0-24 months). The median PFS was also 4 months (range, 0-21 months) for those patients receiving SOFOX-CM as first CM-therapy ( n=61), while it was found to be 0 months (range, 0-10 months) for patients ( n=16) receiving SOFIRI-CM as first chronomodulated therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We found CM-therapy to be effective and safe in the treatment of advanced malignancies of the GI tract. Sodium folinate offers superior feasibility and compatibility with cytostatic drugs without drawbacks.     

Gemcitabine treatment in patients with inoperable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with pancreatic cancer show an inoperable locally advanced/ metastatic tumour at the time of diagnosis. The present study was aimed at determining the prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-seven unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine were included in the study and a total of 258 cycles of treatment were applied. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 5%. Thirty-one percent of the patients had stable disease, whereas progressive disease was seen in 49%. Clinical benefit response rate was 15%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months. Median progression-free survival was 3 months, while median overall survival was 9 months. Univariate analysis revealed that worse results were found in patients with performance status (PS) = 2, and in patients with primary tumour location in the body or tail of the pancreas (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis of data revealed that the most important factor was PS of the patient, as the patients with PS = 2 had worse results than the patients with PS = 0-1 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low PS is a negative predictive factor for the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine.