The role of metabolites in a bioequivalence study II: amoxapine, 7-hydroxyamoxapine, and 8-hydroxyamoxapine.

BACKGROUND: Amoxapine is a dibenzoxazepine type tricyclic antidepressant. The mechanism of clinical action in patients is not well understood. In animals, amoxapine blocks the reuptake of norepinephrine and, to a lesser extent serotonin, into their respective neurons and blocks the response of dopaminergic receptors to dopamine. The major metabolite, 8-hydroxyamoxapine, has similar norepinephrine uptake inhibitory action to the parent drug, but has a more pronounced inhibitory action on serotonin uptake. Another major metabolite, 7-hydroxyamoxapine blocks post-synaptic dopamine receptors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The present study was a traditional two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover design with the primary objective to investigate the average bioequivalence of two formulations of amoxapine. Secondary objectives were to explore the potential roles of metabolites and truncated (partial) areas in bioequivalence studies. Serial plasma samples were harvested from immediately pre dose to 96 hours post dose. The parent drug and the two hydroxy metabolites were monitored by validated HPLC procedures. Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) were calculated for Cmax, AUCinfinity, the truncated areas of AUC, AUCinfinity/Cmax, and the truncated areas of AUC/Cmax. RESULTS: The results indicated that the two formulations were bioequivalent in terms of the conventional parameters Cmax and AUC for all three analytes in the sense that the 90% CIs fitted entirely within preset bioequivalence limits of 80-125%. Moreover, the 90% CIs for the truncated areas AUC2.0hr through AUClast and Cmax/AUC1.0hr through Cmax/AUClast of all three analytes also fell entirely within bioequivalence limits of 80-125%. It was concluded that it was unnecessary to have harvested plasma samples beyond 12 hours, in which case additional plasma samples could have been devoted to the more precise estimation of tmax and Cmax. CONCLUSION: Of the three analytes, test and reference individual plasma concentration versus time curves of 8-hydroxyamoxapine were more closely superimposable than those of the other two analytes. Any decision to use metabolite data in bioequivalence studies, however, must be made a priori to avoid introduction of bias arising from selective post hoc manipulation of the raw data; and to facilitate the design of blood sampling schedules based on prior information about the tmax of the selected analyte.     

Comparative bioavailability of a new commercial tablet formulation and two lots of a reference formulation of haloperidol

The bioavailability of a new tablet formulation (5 mg) of haloperidol was estimated relative to two lots of a reference product. Twenty-eight healthy male volunteers completed all three phases in that they received the test (T) and the two reference formulations (R1 and R2) in a balanced three-way crossover design. Using a sensitive HPLC method, plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were monitored over a period of 96 h following administration of each formulation. Haloperidol was measurable in the plasma of all the volunteers, whereas reduced haloperidol was measurable in only 6 out of 28 volunteers following each administration. Therefore, the assessment of bioequivalence in this study is based on haloperidol data only. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUCot) or infinity (AUCo infinity) were compared by analyses of variance and found not to be significantly different across the formulations. The relative bioavailability based on T:R1 or T:R2 ratios of AUCo infinity, AUCot, and Cmax was, in each case, within the acceptable range of 100 +/- 20%. Also, the relative bioavailability of R1 compared with R2 was within 100 +/- 20% in terms of the above bioavailability parameters. Except for tmax, all other pharmacokinetic parameters showed wide intersubject variation.     

The bioequivalence of liquid and freeze-dried formulations of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin

Objective: To compare the bioavailability and tolerability of liquid and freeze-dried formulations of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (r-hCG).

Subjects and methodsZ In an open-label, randomised, single-centre, Phase I study, healthy adult volunteers (18-50years of age) received single injections of r-hCG 250 ug from reconstituted freeze-dried (1.0mL of 250ug/ml) and liquid (0.5mL of 250ug/0.5ml) formulations in random order, separated by a 10-day wash-out period. Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, AUC, AUClast, tmax and local and systemic tolerability were assessed.

Results Pharmacokinetic properties of the two formulations were very similar, with mean Cmax 125mIU/mL (liquid formulation) vs 129mIU/mL (freeze-dried formulation), mean AUC 10350mIU.h/mLvs 10480mIU.h/mL, mean AUClast 10050mIU.h/mLvs10210mIU.h/mL, and median tmax 20 vs 24h. The 90% confidence intervals of the ratios of the treatment means for Cmax, AUC and AUClast all fell within the pre-defined FDA acceptance range of 0.8–1.25, demonstrating the bioequivalence of the two formulations. Both formulations were equally well tolerated; the most frequent adverse events were headache and nausea.

Conclusion: The liquid formulation of r-hCG was shown to be bioequivalent to the freeze-dried formulation, with no clinically significant differences in tolerability. The liquid formulation of r-hCG can be expected to provide the same efficacy and tolerability as the freeze-dried formulation when used to trigger final follicular maturation in women undergoing therapies for assisted reproduction, together with a greater convenience of use.     

Bioequivalence of two lamivudine tablet formulations

The present study describes the determination of the bioavailability of a new commercial tablet formulation of lamivudine (CAS 134678-17-4) compared with a reference formulation. The comparative bioequivalence of the test and a reference formulation (each 3 x 150 mg) was assessed in 24 healthy volunteers by means of a randomized two-way crossover design. Prior to the study both the test and reference formulations were examined for conformation to chromatographic purity and drug content. Each volunteer received the test (T) and the reference formulation (R) with a one-week drug-free interval between administrations. The plasma concentrations of T were monitored over a period of 12 h after drug administration using a sensitive HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters for T were determined from plasma concentration-time data. Statistical tests were carried out at 90% confidence intervals using a parametric method (three-way ANOVA) for AUC and Cmax, and non-parametric method for Tmax. The present study showed that both formulations were bioequivalent for the geometric mean of AUC(0-12), AUC0-infinity), Cmax, and Tmax at the 90% confidence interval. The bioavailability of the test (%) was 96.7, 93.3, 99.7, 100.3, respectively. The T:R ratio was, in each case, well within the acceptable range of 100 +/- 20%.     

Bioequivalence study of two fluoxetine capsule formulations in healthy Middle Eastern volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of two fluoxetine hydrochloride capsule (20 mg) formulations (Fluoxicare capsule from Pharmacare Ltd., Chemicals and Cosmetics, Ramallah, Palestine, as test formulation, and Prozac from Eli Lilly Ltd., Basingstoke, UK, as reference formulation). DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted open with a randomized 2-period crossover design and a 6-week washout period. Participants were 24 healthy male volunteers aged 18-28 years, divided into 2 groups of 12 subjects. One group was given the originator drug (reference formulation), and the other was given the test formulation. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 14 time points during the interval 0-96 hours after drug administration. The concentrations of the samples were assayed spectrophotometrically at 220 nm using a Shimadzu 160 A UV-visible spectrometer. We calculated the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time of maximum plasma concentration (tmax) for each subject. Logarithmic transformation of the AUC and Cmax was used for the statistical analyses and to assess the bioavailability of the two formulations, using analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Satherwait t-tests for unequal variances. The ANOVA performed of tmax in Cmax, and in AUC provided the appropriate intra-subject variance estimates to evaluate the 90% confidence intervals for the differences between study variables after administration of the test and reference formulations. Statistical analyses were conducted on AUC 0-4 as the extrapolated part of the AUC, a truncated area approach was adapted. RESULTS: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for both of the drugs under study were as follows: Cmax = 61.24 (+/- 12.96) ng/ml for the test formulation, and for the reference formulation Cmax = 61.39 (+/- 14.1) ng/ml, the effects were statistically equivalent. The tmax for the test formulation was 8.25 (+/- 1.7) and 7.33 (+/- 0.96) for the reference formulation. The area under the curve to infinity (AUC 0-infinity (ng, day/ml)) for the test formulation and for the reference formulation were 293.02 (+/- 52.69) and 296.15 (+/- 61.69), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The two formulations had equivalent pharmacokinetic parameters, were well-tolerated, and their relative bioavailability was 98.94%.     

Absorption of phenytoin from rectal suppositories formulated with a polyethylene glycol base

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare phenytoin pharmacokinetics following administration of an oral suspension and a rectal suppository formulated with a polyethylene glycol base. DESIGN: Unblinded, single-dose, randomized, crossover trial. SETTING: University-affiliated pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics laboratory. SUBJECTS: Six healthy subjects. INTERVENTION: Subjects were given a single 200-mg dose of phenytoin as an oral suspension and a rectal suppository separated by a 1-week washout. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood for plasma phenytoin concentrations was obtained at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after administration. Plasma was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (coefficient of variation < 6%) for total phenytoin concentration. Phenytoin maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), time to first measurable concentration (Tlag), and area under the curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUClast) were estimated for oral and rectal administration by WinNonlin (v 1.1) and compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test (p<0.05 for statistical significance). Two subjects did not have detectable plasma phenytoin concentrations after rectal administration. For the other four subjects, median rectal Cmax was significantly lower than oral Cmax (0.4 vs 1.9 microg/ml, p=0.028), median rectal Tmax did not differ from oral Tmax (11.9 vs 8.0 hrs, p=0.465), and median rectal AUClast, although highly variable, was significantly lower than oral AUClast (5.4 vs 36.2 microg x hr/ml, p=0.046). No Tlag was seen after oral administration, but with rectal administration the median Tlag was 2 hours. The estimated relative bioavailability of rectal phenytoin suppositories based on AUC0-24 was 4.7%, with individual values ranging from 0-58.3%. CONCLUSION: It appears that absorption of phenytoin from polyethylene glycol rectal suppositories in healthy subjects is highly variable and unpredictable. Thus this formulation is not recommended.     

Comparative bioavailability of two losartan formulations in healthy human volunteers after a single dose administration

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of two potassic losartan immediate release tablet (50 mg) formulations (Losartan from Laboratórios Cristália Ltd., Brazil, as a test formulation and Cozaar from Merck Sharp & Dohme Farmacêutica Ltd., Brazil, as a reference formulation) in 25 volunteers of both sexes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in an open, randomized, 2-period crossover design and a 1-week washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 24-hour interval. The concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite losartan acid were analyzed by combined reversed phase liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with negative ion electrospray ionization using a selected ion monitoring method. From the losartan and losartan acid plasma concentrations vs. time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUClast, AUC0-inf and Cmax. RESULTS: The geometric mean and respective 90% confidence interval (CI) of Losartan/Cozaar losartan percent ratios were 92.9% (82.2-105.0%) for Cmax, 99.0% (92.5-105.9%) for AUClast, and 99.1% (92.7-105.8%) for AUC0-inf. Furthermore, the geometric mean and respective 90% CI of Losartan/Cozaar losartan acid percent ratios were 98.5% (91.5-106.0%) for Cmax, 97.9% (93.3 102.7%) for AUClast, and 98.1% (93.6-102.9%) for AUC0-inf. CONCLUSION: Since the 90% CI for Cmax, AUClast and AUC0-inf were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that the potassic losartan immediate release 50 mg tablet was bioequivalent to the Cozaar immediate release 50 mg tablet, according to both the rate and extent of absorption. While there were no significant differences in the bioequivalence assessed by either losartan or losartan acid, future bioequivalence studies on losartan may be performed by quantifying losartan alone as the parent compounds are more discriminative.     

Comparative bioavailability of two fluconazole capsule formulations in healthy volunteers

This work reports the bioavailability of two fluconazole (CAS 86386-73-4) capsule formulations in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single oral dose (150 mg). The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with two-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained up to 168 h after drug administration and fluconazole concentration were analyzed using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluconazole after the administration of each formulation included the area under the curve (AUC)(0-168 h), AUC(0-infinity), maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), elimination constant (Ke) and half-life (T1/2). The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test formulation/reference formulation were 97.18-108.60% for AUC0-168 h), 90.87-111.11% for AUC(0-infinity), 104.88-114.88% for Cmax 90.38-136.79% for Ke, 91.87-108.93% for T1/2 and (-)1.5-(-)0.10 for Tmax (for individual differences). Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% CI are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the test formulation (Zoltrix) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects

This study presents the results of a two-way, two-period, two-treatment crossover investigation in 12 healthy Indian male subjects to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations containing 50 mg of diacerein (CAS 13739-02-1). Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a one-week washout period. The content of diacerein in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.63% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

盐酸特比萘芬片在健康人体中的相对生物利用度及生物等效性试验

目的:评价盐酸特比萘芬片在健康人体的相对生物利用度和生物等效性。方法:20名健康受试者随机交叉单剂量口服盐酸特比萘芬片受试制剂(T)和参比制剂(R),采用液质联用分析方法(LC-MS/MS)测定血浆中特比萘芬浓度。结果:20名健康受试者口服受试制剂和参比制剂后的主要药代动力学参数为:Tmax分别为(1.7±0.6)和(2.2±0.7)h;Cmax分别为(1 590±489)和(1 266.6±432.8)ng·mL-1;t1/2分别为:(21.6±3.6)和(21.0±10.1)h;AUC0～t分别为(8 272.2±2 280.6)和(8 138.9±2 424.0)ng·h·mL-1。受试制剂的AUC0～t或Cmax的90%置信区间对应于参比制剂相应参数的93.44%～111.87%或112.83%～141.91%范围内;受试制剂相对于参比制剂的相对生物利用度为(105.5±26.3)%。结论:受试制剂与参比制剂的生物利用度相当,但受试制剂峰浓度增加,达峰时间提前,没有增加不良反应,疗效也未见降低。     

Bioequivalence of liquid and freeze-dried recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone

OBJECTIVE: The bioequivalence and tolerability of freeze-dried and liquid formulations of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) filled-by-mass were assessed in a crossover, open-label, randomised, single-centre, phase I bioequivalence study. METHODS: Following pituitary down-regulation with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist goserelin, healthy adult volunteers (18years-45years of age) received single subcutaneous injections of r-hFSH , 300 IU, from freeze-dried and liquid formulations in random order, separated by a 7-day washout period. Blood was obtained over 144 h for pharmacokinetic analysis. Main outcome measures: These were peak serum FSH concentrations (Cmax,), time to peak concentration (Tmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUCJ), local and systemic tolerability. RESULTS: Of 44 volunteers who underwent down-regulation, 39 (18 men, 21 women) completed the study. Cmax and AUClast were similar with the freeze-dried (mean 9.51 IU/L and 844 IU.h/L, respectively) and liquid (mean 8.99 IU/L and 841 IUh/L, respectively) formulations, whereas T was significantly higher with the liquid formulation (median 12h vs 15h, p = 0.0183). The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the treatment means for Cnw and AUC,=, were within the pre-defined bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. CONCLUSION: Both formulations were well tolerated with regard to both systemic and local adverse events. The freeze-dried and liquid formulations of r-hFSH are bioequivalent and show no significant differences in tolerability. Thus, the liquid formulation is expected to provide comparable efficacy and tolerability to the freeze-dried formulation in clinical use.     

Comparative bioavailability study with two gemfibrozil tablet formulations in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of gemfibrozil (CAS 25812-30-0) 900 mg tablet formulation from EMS Farmaceutica as test formulation versus a 900 mg tablet formulation as reference in 36 healthy volunteers of both sexes. METHODS: The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 1-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained over a 24-h period. Plasma gemfibrozil concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with negative ion electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). From the gemfibrozil plasma concentration vs time curves, the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUClast, AUC(0-inf) and Cmax. RESULTS: The limit of quantification was 0.05 microg/mL for plasma gemfibrozil analysis. The geometric mean and respective 90% confidence interval (CI) of Test/Reference percent ratios were 90.29 (81.39-100.17) for Cmax, 96.26 (90.33-102.59) for AUClast, 96.04 (90.21-102.23) for AUC(0-24 h) and 96.62 (90.82-102.78) for AUC(0-infinity). CONCLUSION: Since the 90% CI for AUClast, AUC(0-inf) and Cmax, ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the U.S. FDA, it was concluded that gemfibrozil 900 mg tablet (test formulation) was bioequivalent to the 900 mg tablet reference formulation for both rate and extent of absorption.     

Bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations containing rimonabant 20 mg in healthy Indian subjects

A randomized, two-treatment and two-way crossover study on twelve healthy Indian male subjects was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations containing 20 mg of rimonabant (CAS 158681-13-1). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose with a 45-day washout period between two dosing sessions. The content of rimonabant in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this investigation indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.62% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Bioequivalence evaluation of two marketed brands of stavudine 40 mg capsules in healthy human South African volunteers.

Stavudine (d4T), a thymidine nucleoside analogue has been effectively used for treatment of patients infected with HIV. A randomized, two-way, crossover study was conducted in 24 fasting, healthy, Caucasian male volunteers to compare plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and single-dose tolerability of a new d4T formulation (Stavir, Cipla Ltd, India; 40 mg capsule, test, T) with that of reference (R) formulation (Zerit), Bristol-Myers Squib, NJ, USA; capsule, 40 mg). Each volunteer received T and R formulation separated by at least 10 days of drug free wash-out period. Plasma concentrations of d4T, determined upto 24h post-dose by a validated LC-MS/MS assay were utilized to assess PK parameters such as maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under plasma concentration curve (AUC(infinity)). The primary plasma PK parameters, Cmax, and AUC(infinity), of anti-retroviral were comparable for either of the formulations. tmax was achieved within an hour suggesting rapid absorption of d4T from both formulations. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) (percentage reference) of AUC(infinity) and Cmax, and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were 106.32 [102.52-110.26] and 102.32 [90.25-116.00], respectively. As the 90% CI of GMR were entirely within 80-125% for log-transformed parameters, two formulations were considered bioequivalent, in the extent and rate of absorption. Both formulations exhibited similar tolerability under fasting conditions.     

Comparative bioavailability study of doxycycline hyclate (equivalent to 100 mg doxycycline) capsules (doxycin vs vibramycin) for bioequivalence evaluation in healthy adult volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new capsule formulation of doxycycline (100 mg), doxycin, relative to the reference product, vibramycin (100 mg) capsules. The bioavailability was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose (100 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a 2-week washout period. A randomized, balanced 2-way cross-over design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of doxycycline were analyzed by a sensitive and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for doxycycline were determined using standard noncompartmental methods. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, K(el), t(1/2) and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80-125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis of the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 95.98-109.56%, 92.21 to 107.66%, 93.90-112.56%, and 96.0 to 106.91% respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) by the Schuirmann's two 1-sided t-tests. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Relative bioavailability of a commercial trifluoperazine tablet formulation using a radioimmunoassay technique

The relative bioavailability of a new conventional tablet formulation (5 mg) of trifluoperazine dihydrochloride was studied in 24 healthy volunteers. Using a sensitive radioimmunoassay technique, plasma trifluoperazine concentrations were measured up until 24 h following ingestion of single 5-mg doses of trifluoperazine. The mean +/- SD for the peak concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC240), and terminal elimination half-life following the administration of the test formulation were 2.15 +/- 1.07 ng/mL, 4.10 +/- 1.38 h, 21.04 +/- 11.92 ng X h/mL, and 9.5 +/- 7 h, respectively. Following the ingestion of the original trifluoperazine tablet formulation (5 mg) these same parameters were estimated to be 1.92 +/- 0.88 ng/mL, 4.02 +/- 1.10 h, 18.03 +/- 10.11 ng X h/mL, and 9.3 +/- 7 h, respectively. Large intersubject variations in Cmax and AUC240 were observed. The relative bioavailability of the test formulation was calculated to be 106.5 +/- 25.5%.     

Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) : relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 50 mg/mL oral suspension and 200mg and 800mg tablet formulations

PURPOSE: To investigate the bioavailability and bioequivalence of three different formulations of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093): 50 mg/mL oral suspension (test 1), 200mg tablets (test 2) and 800mg tablets (reference). DESIGN, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Single-centre, open-label, randomised, three-way crossover study in 18 healthy subjects. The study consisted of three consecutive periods separated by a washout period of 7 days or more. Each subject received a single dose of eslicarbazepine acetate 800mg on three different occasions: 16mL of oral 50 mg/mL suspension, four 200mg tablets or one 800mg tablet. RESULTS: Eslicarbazepine acetate was rapidly and extensively metabolised to BIA 2-005. Maximum BIA 2-005 plasma concentrations (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinfinity) were, respectively (arithmetic mean +/- SD), 18.0 +/- 4.6 microg/mL and 325.7 +/- 64.9 microg x h/mL for test 1, 16.0 +/- 4.0 microg/mL and 304.2 +/- 66.0 microg x h/mL for test 2, and 17.0 +/- 4.1 microg/mL and 301.1 +/- 60.0 microg x h/mL for the reference formulation. Point estimate (PE) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUCinfinity test 1/reference geometric mean ratio were 1.09 and 1.01, 1.15; for Cmax ratio, PE and 90% CI were 1.07 and 0.97, 1.15. When test 2 and the reference formulations were compared, the PE and 90% CI were 0.99 and 0.94, 1.07 for the AUCinfinity ratio, and 0.94 and 0.86, 1.02 for the Cmax ratio. Bioequivalence of test versus reference formulations is thus accepted for both AUCinfinity and Cmax because the 90% CIs lie within the acceptance range of 0.80-1.25. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profiles of eslicarbazepine acetate oral 50 mg/mL suspension, 200mg tablet and 800mg tablet formulations were essentially similar, and the formulations can be considered bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Comparative bioavailability study of cefixime (equivalent to 100 mg/5 ml) suspension (Winex vs Suprax) in healthy male volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new suspension formulation of cefixime (100 mg/5 ml), Winex, relative to the reference product, Suprax (100 mg/5 ml) suspension. The bio-availability study was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose (200 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products on 2 treatment days after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. A randomized, balanced two-way crossover design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 16 hours. Plasma concentrations of cefixime were analyzed using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime were determined using standard non-compartmental method. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Kel, t1/2 and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using raw and log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pnfinity harmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80 - 125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 88.93 - 107.10%, 89.09 - 107.11%, 89.63 - 108.58% and 96.85 - 105.29%, respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax using the Schuirmann's two one-sided t-tests. Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.