Discordances in ER,PR, and HER2 between primary breast cancer and brain metastasis

When distant metastases are discovered, it is important to determine receptor profiles of these lesions through histologic examination. However, brain metastasis sites are difficult to reach to be routinely biopsied. The purpose of this study was to determine expression profiles of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) and the existence of discordance between primary breast cancer and brain metastasis. A total of 37 patients who underwent craniotomies for metastatic brain tumors arising from breast cancer at National Cancer Center (NCC) of Korea between 2002 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic data were collected from electronic medical records. Receptor profiles of primary breast cancer and brain metastasis in each patient were identified. Data of ER, PR, and HER2 expression in brain metastasis were available in electronic medical records for 21 (56.8%) of 37 cases. Results of ER, PR, and HER2 expression were positive in 47.6, 42.9, and 38.1% of patients with brain metastasis, respectively. Receptor conversion occurred in 11 (52.4%) of 21 patients (for ER, 9.5%; for PR, 38.1%; for HER2, 23.8%). Overall survival was longer in patients with concordant receptor expression patterns between primary breast cancer and brain lesion compared to that in patients with discordant patterns. However, such difference was not statistically significant (discordant vs. concordant median survival: 19.2 versus 31.1 months, p?=?0.181). Receptor conversion in BCBMs was observed in over 50% of Korean patients used in this study. HER2 conversion was observed in 23.8% of patients in this study. Therefore, if resistance to anti-HER2 treatment is suspected in patients with BCBM, biopsy is needed to determine receptor profiles of brain lesion.     

Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases

Introduction

When breast cancer patients develop distant metastases, the choice of systemic treatment is usually based on tissue characteristics of the primary tumor as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or molecular analysis. Several previous studies have shown that the immunophenotype of distant breast cancer metastases may be different from that of the primary tumor (receptor conversion), leading to inappropriate choice of systemic treatment. The studies published so far are however small and/or methodologically suboptimal. Therefore, definite conclusions that may change clinical practice could not yet be drawn. We therefore aimed to study receptor conversion for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in a large group of distant (non-bone) breast cancer metastases by re-staining all primary tumors and metastases with current optimal immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization methods on full sections.

Methods

A total of 233 distant breast cancer metastases from different sites (76 skin, 63 liver, 43 lung, 44 brain and 7 gastro-intestinal) were IHC stained for ERα, PR and HER2, and expression was compared to that of the primary tumor. HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) was done in cases of IHC conversion or when primary tumors or metastases showed an IHC 2+ result.

Results

Using a 10% threshold, receptor conversion by IHC for ERα, PR occurred in 10.3%, 30.0% of patients, respectively. In 10.7% of patients, conversion from ER+ or PR+ to ER-/PR- and in 3.4% from ER-/PR- to ER+ or PR+ was found. Using a 1% threshold, ERα and PR conversion rates were 15.1% and 32.6%. In 12.4% of patients conversion from ER+ or PR+ to ER-/PR-, and 8.2% from ER-/PR- to ER+ or PR+ occurred. HER2 conversion occurred in 5.2%. Of the 12 cases that showed HER2 conversion by IHC, 5 showed also conversion by ISH. One further case showed conversion by ISH, but not by IHC. Conversion was mainly from positive in the primary tumor to negative in the metastases for ERα and PR, while HER2 conversion occurred equally both ways. PR conversion occurred significantly more often in liver, brain and gastro-intestinal metastases.

Conclusions

Receptor conversion by immunohistochemistry in (non-bone) distant breast cancer metastases does occur, is relatively uncommon for ERα and HER2, and is more frequent for PR, especially in brain, liver and gastro-intestinal metastases.     

乳腺癌原发灶和转移灶激素受体与HER2表达差异及其影响因素

目的 乳腺癌的治疗已经进入分子分型时代,雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)、孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)和人类表皮生长因子受体-2(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER2)的表达对指导制订乳腺癌治疗方案及评价患者预后等尤为重要.许多研究证实,部分乳腺癌患者原发灶及转移灶激素受体与HER2表达存在差异,影响术后辅助及解救治疗方案的制订,进而影响患者的治疗效果及预后.本研究探讨乳腺癌原发灶与腋窝及远处转移灶之间激素受体与HER2表达的差异及其临床意义,同时分析了造成差异的影响因素.方法 以乳腺癌、激素受体(ER和PR)、HER2、原发灶和转移灶为关键词,检索PubMed、CNKI数据库和万方数据库1995-01-2016-10的相关文献.共505篇文章被检索到.纳入标准:原发灶与腋窝转移灶激素受体及HER2表达差异情况,原发灶与远处转移灶激素受体及HER2表达差异情况,原发灶与转移灶激素受体及HER2表达差异情况的临床意义.根据纳入标准最终纳入分析38篇文献.结果 在部分乳腺癌患者中,原发灶与腋窝转移灶及远处转移灶激素受体及HER2表达情况存在差异,多数文献报道,乳腺癌原发灶与转移灶ER表达状况变化(阳性转阴性或阴性转阳性)比例约为20％,PR约为20％,HER2约为15％.“肿瘤异质性、抗肿瘤治疗和检测方法”等是影响其表达差异的影响因素.结论 推荐对于存在局部及远处转移的乳腺癌患者,同时检测并综合原发灶及转移灶的激素受体及HER2表达情况制订治疗方案.     

Different Breast Cancer Subtypes Show Different Metastatic Patterns: A Study from A Large Public Database

Background: Receptor status in breast cancer is known to be related to survival. However, the relationship between breast cancer subtype, preferential sites of metastasis, and overall survival is not clear. Methods: A total of 414,528 patients from the National Cancer Database (2010-2013) were examined. All patients received surgery and systemic treatments. Breast cancer was subtyped based on hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2 status. Results: HR-/HER2+ breast cancer patients had the highest overall rate of metastasis while HR+/HER2- had the lowest. HR+/HER2+ cancer had the most frequent metastasis to the bone, and HR-/HER2+ to brain, liver, lung and multiple sites. Generally, patients with brain or multiple metastasis had the worst overall survival (OS) across different subtypes.  Patients with bone oligometastasis tend to have better OS than patients with metastasis to other site but significantly worse OS than patients without any metastasis. Conclusions: This large study exhibits how breast cancer subtype plays a role in the rate and site of metastasis as well as in overall survival.  Surveillance and treatment strategies should be tailored on the risk and potential site of metastases based upon receptor subtype.     

Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases: Clinicopathologic Features,Survival, and Paired Biomarker Analysis

Background.

The aim of this study was to describe clinicopathologic features of patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM); to evaluate survival after diagnosis of BCBM; and to compare estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression in the paired primary and brain tumors.

Materials and Methods.

We identified 140 consecutive patients who underwent craniotomy for BCBM (either for diagnostic purpose or with therapeutic intent) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2009.

Results.

Most patients had invasive ductal histology (91%), grade 3 tumors (67%), and positive axillary lymph node (64%). Of the tumors, 56% were ER-negative, 62% were PR-negative, 44% were HER2-positive, and 28% were triple negative (TN). Brain metastasis (BM) was solitary in 51% of patients. Median interval from breast cancer diagnosis to BM was 46 months; median survival after BM was 14.1 months. In the univariate analysis, younger age, solitary brain metastasis, and ER or PR positivity in the breast tumors were associated with longer survival. There was a statistical trend toward increased survival in HER2-positive patients compared with HER2-negative patients (18 vs. 11 months). In the multivariate analysis, predictors for longer survival included younger age, solitary brain lesion, and HER2 positivity in the breast cancer. Biomarkers were evaluated in paired primary and brain tumors in 35 patients for ER status, 34 for PR status, and 36 for HER2 status. Discordant rates were 28% for ER, 20% for PR, and 3% for HER2.

Conclusion.

Compared with unselected breast cancer patients at the same institution, patients with breast cancer who had brain metastases had a higher proportion of hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive, and TN tumors. Younger age, solitary brain lesion, and HER2 expression were independent predictors of better survival in patients with BCBM. HER2 status was highly concordant between the paired primary and brain tumors, whereas changes of ER and PR status occurred in a substantial proportion of the patients. These findings are important for making effective treatment decisions for patients with BCBM.     

Discordance in ERα, PR and HER2 receptor status across different distant breast cancer metastases within the same patient

BackgroundWe studied discordance in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between multiple distant metastases from the same breast cancer patient.Material and methodsMultiple distant metastases from 55 female patients were stained for ERα, PR and HER2 by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for confirmation of the HER2 status.ResultsDifferent metastatic sites within the same patient showed discordance in ERα receptor status in 7.3% or 10.9% of patients (using a 10% or 1% threshold for positivity, respectively). For PR, 29.1% or 30.9% of patients showed discordance. Taking ERα and PR together, 36.4% of cases (both thresholds) showed discrepancy between metastases. In 10.9% (10% threshold) or 14.5% of patients (1% threshold), such discordance could have clinical consequences with regard to hormonal treatment. For HER2, there was 3.6% discordance on the immunohistochemical level but 0% on the gene level.ConclusionIn a significant proportion of metastatic breast cancer patients, discordance in ERα and PR receptor status between different metastatic sites was observed. This implies that multiple metastases may need to be biopsied to optimally reassess receptors.     

Alterations in Hormonal Receptor Expression and HER2 Status between Primary Breast Tumors and Paired Nodal Metastases: Discordance Rates and Prognosis

Background: We aimed to evaluate the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression discordance in matched pairs of primary breast cancerand lymph node metastasis specimens and determine the effect of discordance on prognosis. Materials andMethods: Among all patients diagnosed with lymph node metastases from 2004 to 2007, primary tumors andpaired lymph node metastases were resected from 209 patients. The status of ER, PR, and HER2 expressionwas analyzed immunohistochemically in 200, 194, and 193 patients, respectively. Discordance was correlatedwith prognosis. Results: Biomarker discordance between primary tumors and paired lymph node metastaseswas 25.0% (50/200) for ER status, 28.9% (56/194) for PR status, and 14.0% (27/193) for HER2 status. ERpositivity was a significant independent predictor of improved survival when analyzed in primary tumors andlymph node metastases. Patients with PR-positive primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases displayedsignificantly enhanced survival compared to patients with PR-positive primary tumors and PR-negative lymphnode metastases. Patients with ER- and PR-positive primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases whoreceived endocrine therapy after surgery displayed significantly better survival than those not receiving endocrinetherapy. Similalry treated patients with PR-negative primary tumors and PR-positive paired lymph nodemetastases also displayed better survival than those not receiving endocrine therapy. Conclusions: Biomarkerdiscordance was observed in matched pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastases. Such cases displayedpoor survival. Thus, it is important to reassess receptor biomarkers used for lymph node metastases.     

Prognostic value of estrogen receptor α and progesterone receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases

BACKGROUND:

Changes in the receptor profile of primary breast cancers to their metastases (receptor conversion) have been described for the estrogen receptor α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of receptor conversion for ERα and PR on survival in a large group of distant non‐bone breast cancer metastases.

METHODS:

Receptor conversion was studied by immunohistochemistry in a group of 233 metastatic breast cancer patients. Kaplan‐Meier overall survival curves were plotted, and differences between the curves were analyzed by log‐rank analysis. The additional prognostic value of conversion to established prognosticators was studied by Cox regression.

RESULTS:

Overall survival of patients showing conversion from positive to negative ERα or PR, or from negative to positive ERα or PR, or remaining receptor negative was comparable, and significantly worse than patients remaining receptor positive. ERα or PR receptor conversion from positive in the primary breast tumor to negative in distant metastases has independent negative prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS:

ERα or PR receptor conversion from positive in the primary breast cancer to negative in distant metastases has negative prognostic value. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Breast cancer surface receptors predict risk for developing brain metastasis and subsequent prognosis

Determining the status of breast cancer surface receptors (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2/neu) has become routine in the care of patients with this disease and has proven to be helpful in guiding treatment. For this reason, breast cancer has become a model for molecularly guided therapy in solid tumors. Emerging data support that these receptors are associated with risk for developing brain metastases. Additionally, once brain metastases have occurred these receptors may also correlate with prognosis.     

The predictive value of steroid hormone receptor analysis in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer

The predictive value of female sex steroid, estrogen and progesterone, receptor (ER and PR, respectively) assays in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer is reviewed with emphasis on comparative aspects of these malignant tumors in relation to their hormone dependency. The endocrine etiology of these three tumor types seems to be at least partly different, and so is the expression of these receptors in normal and malignant tissues of the breast, endometrium and ovary. There is a tendency for decreased receptor concentrations and disappearance of these receptors in association with advancement of these malignancies. There is also a decrease in the presence and concentrations of ER and PR in relation to loss of differentiation in breast and endometrial cancer. Receptor analyses have an established position in the selection of patients with advanced breast cancer for endocrine treatment, and they give promise of a similar application in endometrial cancer and in endometrioid cancer of the ovary. It is not clear whether the disease-free interval is related to the presence or concentrations of ER or PR as such in the tumor tissue. There is better survival in breast cancer patients with receptor-positive tumors, which might be due to a response to endocrine treatment. The same seems to be true for patients with endometrial cancer. Future progress in the application of female sex steroid receptor analyses in breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer needs additional controlled clinical trials and more highly developed receptor assays.     

Discrepancies between biomarkers of primary breast cancer and subsequent brain metastases: an international multicenter study

Purpose

Discordances between the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), expression between primary breast tumors and their subsequent brain metastases (BM) were investigated in breast cancer patients.

Methods

We collected retrospective data from 11 institutions in 8 countries in a predefined-standardized format. Receptor status (positive or negative) was determined according to institutional guidelines (immunohistochemically and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization). The study was subject to each institution’s ethical research committee.

Results

A total of 167 breast cancer patients with BM were included. 25 patients out of 129 with a complete receptor information from both primary tumor and BM (ER, PR, HER2) available, had a change in receptor status: 7 of 26 (27%) ER/PR-positive/HER2-negative primaries (3 gained HER2; 4 lost expression of ER/PR); 10 of 31 (32%) ER/PR-positive/HER2-positive primaries (4 lost ER/PR only; 3 lost HER2 only; 3 lost both ER/PR and HER2); one of 33 (3%) ER/PR-negative receptor/HER2-positive primaries (gained ER); and 7 of 39 (18%) triple-negative primaries (5 gained ER/PR and 2 gained HER2).

Conclusions

The majority of breast cancer patients with BM in this series had primary HER2-enriched tumors, followed by those with a triple-negative profile. One out of 5 patients had a receptor discrepancy between the primary tumor and subsequent BM. Therefore, we advise receptor status assessment of BM in all breast cancer patients with available histology as it may have significant implications for therapy.

     

Selected breast cancer highlights from the ASCO 2012

The abstracts are a selection of clinically relevant papers presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2012. The results of the EMILIA study were a milestone presented at the meeting. A total of 991 patients with metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer had been pretreated with a taxane and trastuzumab. They were randomized into two groups: Trastuzumab emtansine conjugate (T-DM1) or capecitabine-lapatinib. Significant differences were found with regard to progression-free survival and the two-year overall survival. Another study analyzed the relevance of the hormone-receptor (HR) status for the prognosis of patients with operable HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. A significant difference in the risk of the development of brain metastases was found depending on the HR status. In the MA.27 study, patients received adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors. A significant proportion of cases reported therapy of osteoporosis, mainly with bisphosphonates. Osteoporosis therapy influenced recurrence-free survival. In another study, the prognostic influence of Ki-67 was evaluated before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide). A metaanalysis analyzed the possible discordance between the HR status and the HER2 status in the primary tumor as compared to metastasis in 2,806 breast cancer patients. The estrogen-receptor (ER)-, and the progesterone-receptor (PR) status as well as the HER2 status changed in a significant proportion of cases. Parenteral nutrition in 129 terminal oncological patients with progressive cancer was investigated within a randomized placebo-controlled trial. They either received one liter of 0.9 % physiological saline subcutaneously or placebo. Survival, symptoms of dehydration, and quality of life were analyzed.     

Prognostic value of receptor conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study

The hormone receptor (HR) status and human epidermal growth hormone receptor 2 (HER2) status of patients with breast cancer may change following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of receptor conversion in breast cancer patients treated with NCT.Of the 423 consecutive patients who had residual disease in the breast after NCT, 55 (13.0%) changed from HR (+) to HR (−), 23 (5.4%) changed from HR (−) to HR (+), 27 (6.4%) changed from HER2 (+) to HER2 (−), and 13 (3.1%) changed from HER2 (−) to HER2 (+). A total of 54 (12.8%) changed to the triple-negative (TN) tumor phenotype. The loss of HR positivity was an independent prognostic factor for worse disease-free survival (DFS) and worse overall survival (OS) in multivariate survival analysis. Furthermore, the switch to the TN phenotype after NCT was another independent prognostic factor for worse survival for both DFS and OS. In conclusion, patients with breast cancer may experience changes in HR status, HER2 status and tumor phenotype after NCT. The loss of HR positivity and the switch to the TN phenotype after NCT were associated with a worse patient outcome.     

Incidence and prognostic significance of receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and paired bone metastases

ER, PgR and HER-2 status are the cornerstones of choosing systemic therapy for breast cancer, but can change during the disease course. Guidelines recommended the biopsy of the metastatic tumor to reassess receptor status. Bone is the most frequent metastatic site of breast cancer but remained technically difficult to biopsy. Our study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and paired bone metastases. One hundred and fifty-five breast cancer patients were diagnosed with pathology-confirmed bone metastasis at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Ninety-three patients with receptor status available on both primary tumor and bone metastases were included in our study. ER, PgR and HER-2 status converted from positive to negative in 10.8% (10/93), 28.0% (26/93) and 8.6% (8/93) of the patients, while ER, PgR and HER-2 status converted from negative to positive in 3.2% (3/93), 4.3% (4/93) and 1.1% (1/93) of the patients, respectively. 40.4% (17/42) of the HER2-0 tumors converted to HER2-low, which enabled them to receive the treatment of new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Prior endocrine and anti-HER2 therapy were the independent risk factors for receptor conversion. Loss of HR expression in bone metastases was significantly associated with worse first-line PFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.271, P-value = .039) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 6.09, P-value = .011). In conclusion, our study confirmed that patients may experience receptor conversion between primary breast cancer and bone metastases, possibly influenced by prior treatments, which significantly influenced prognosis. The rebiopsy of bone metastases in patients with primary HER2-0 tumors may benefit from the new ADC drugs.     

Progesterone receptor expression is an independent prognostic variable in early breast cancer: a population-based study

Background:

Progesterone receptor (PR) expression assessment in early invasive breast cancer remains controversial. This study sought to re-evaluate PR expression as a potential therapeutic guide in early breast cancer; particularly in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, lymph node (LN)-negative disease.

Methods:

A population cohort of 1074 patients presenting to a single Cancer Centre over 4 years (2000–2004) underwent surgery for primary invasive breast cancer with curative intent. Prospective data collection included patient demographics, pathology, ER and PR expression, HER2 status, adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Progesterone receptor expression was compared with (all causes) overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results:

Overall survival was 71.0% and BCSS was 83.0% at median follow-up of 8.34 years. Absent PR expression was significantly associated with poorer prognosis for OS, BCSS and DFS (P<0.0001, log-rank), even within the ER-positive, LN-negative group (hazard ratio for BCSS 3.17, 95% CI 1.43–7.01) and was not influenced by endocrine therapy. Cox''s regression analysis demonstrated that PR expression was an independent prognostic variable.

Conclusion:

Absence of PR expression is a powerful, independent prognostic variable in operable, primary breast cancer even in ER-positive, LN-negative patients receiving endocrine therapy. Absence of PR expression should be re-evaluated as a biomarker for poor prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer and such patients considered for additional systemic therapy.     

Loss of breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 protein expression predicts reduced disease-free survival in subsets of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the effect of loss of breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) protein expression on disease-free survival in breast cancer patients stratified by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or HER2 status, and to determine whether loss of BRMS1 protein expression correlated with genomic copy number changes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A tissue microarray immunohistochemical analysis was done on tumors of 238 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who underwent surgery at the Cleveland Clinic between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 1996, and a comparison was made with 5-year clinical follow-up data. Genomic copy number changes were determined by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in 47 breast cancer cases from this population and compared with BRMS1 staining. RESULTS: BRMS1 protein expression was lost in nearly 25% of cases. Patients with tumors that were PR negative (P=0.006) or HER2 positive (P=0.039) and <50 years old at diagnosis (P=0.02) were more likely to be BRMS1 negative. No overall correlation between BRMS1 staining and disease-free survival was observed. A significant correlation, however, was seen between loss of BRMS1 protein expression and reduced disease-free survival when stratified by either loss of ER (P=0.008) or PR (P=0.029) or HER2 overexpression (P=0.026). Overall, there was poor correlation between BRMS1 protein staining and copy number status. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a mechanistic relationship between BRMS1 expression, hormone receptor status, and HER2 growth factor. BRMS1 staining could potentially be used in patient stratification in conjunction with other prognostic markers. Further, mechanisms other than genomic deletion account for loss of BRMS1 gene expression in breast tumors.     

Breast cancer subtypes and survival in Chinese women with operable primary breast cancer

Objective: To investigate the associations between the different breast cancer subtypes and survival in Chinese women with operable primary breast cancer. Methods: A total of 1538 Chinese women with operable primary breast cancer were analyzed in this study, the median follow-up was 77 months. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status were available for these patients. Results: Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-) had a favorable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) c...     

Clonal alteration of breast cancer receptors between primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and corresponding local events

BackgroundEmerging data propose biomarker alteration due to clonal selection between the primary invasive breast cancer and corresponding metastases. In addition, impact on survival has been demonstrated. The present study investigates the relationship between the oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) between primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and intra-individually matched ipsilateral event.Materials and methodsThe cohort includes 1504 patients, diagnosed with a primary DCIS between 1986 and 2004. Of the 274 patients who developed a local relapse, 135 developed a new in situ carcinoma and 139 an invasive cancer up to 31st December 2011. ER and PR were identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 by silver-enhanced in situ hybridisation (SISH) as well as IHC.ResultsER (n = 112), PR (n = 113) and HER2 (n = 114) status from both the primary DCIS and the corresponding relapse were assessed and were demonstrated to be discordant in 15.1%, 29.2% and 10.5% respectively. The receptor conversion was both from negative to positive and from positive to negative with no general pattern being seen in spite of sub-dividing into in situ relapse and invasive relapse. However, primary DCIS was HER2 positive in 40.3% whereas in situ and invasive relapses were HER2 positive in 42.9% and 34.5% respectively.ConclusionsReceptor conversion for ER, PR and HER2 status occurred between primary DCIS and corresponding local relapse in 10–30%. This study could not confirm that HER2 overexpression in primary DCIS had any impact on tumour progression to invasive cancer which has been proposed.     

Steroid hormone receptor expression in male breast cancer.

AIMS: To investigate expression of the steroid hormone receptors estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha and -beta, progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) in male breast cancer. METHODS: Specimens from 16 male breast cancers were immunostained for ERalpha, ERbeta, PR and AR. FINDINGS: Eighty-seven percent of tumours expressed ERalpha, 93% PR, 87% ERbeta and 87% AR. Staining for ERalpha and PR was confined exclusively to the nuclei of epithelial cells with some heterogeneity. Nuclear immunoreactivity was also observed with AR. Again this was restricted to epithelial cells but tended to be more uniform. ERbeta was seen in the nuclei of epithelial cells and also in stromal fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Analysis of serial sections revealed a similar pattern of staining with ERbeta and AR in epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to expression of the better known steroid receptors, ERalpha, PR and AR, we have demonstrated a high rate of expression of ERbeta in male breast cancer. This is in keeping with the generally high steroid receptor expression seen in males. However, the abundance of ERbeta expressed in this small series of male breast cancer is in contrast to female breast cancer where ERbeta expression is often reduced.     

Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype,RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT)

Background: Patients with breast cancer brain metastasis are a heterogeneous group in relation to tumor biology and outcome.Materials and methods: The group of 222 breast cancer patients with brain metastasis was divided into three biological subgroups. The propensity of biological subtypes for metastases to the brain and survivals depending on biological subtype, recursive partitioning analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RPA RTOG) prognostic class and the use of systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy were assessed.Results: The rate of patients with triple-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and luminal breast cancer with brain metastases was 28%, 53% and 19%, respectively. Median survival from brain metastases in triple-negative, HER2-positive and luminal subtype was 3.7, 9 and 15 months, respectively. Median survival from brain metastases in RPA RTOG prognostic class I, II and III was 15, 11 and 3 months, respectively. In the luminal and in the triple-negative subtype, systemic therapy prolonged survival from 3 to 14 months and from 3 to 4 months, respectively. In HER2-positive subtype, median survival without further treatment, after chemotherapy and after chemotherapy with targeted therapy were 3, 8 and 11 months, respectively.Conclusions: HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancers have special predilection for metastases to the brain. Survival from brain metastases depended on performance status and the use of systemic treatment.