Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized Coronary Artery Surgery Study

The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) randomized 780 patients to an initial strategy of coronary surgery or medical therapy. Of medically randomized patients, 6% had surgery within 6 months and a total of 40% had surgery by 10 years. At 10 years, there was no difference in cumulative survival (medical, 79% vs. surgical, 82%; NS) and no difference in percentage free of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (medical, 69% vs. surgical, 66%; NS). Patients with an ejection fraction of less than 0.50 exhibited a better survival with initial surgery treatment (medical, 61% vs. surgical, 79%; p = 0.01). Conversely, patients with an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 0.50 exhibited a higher proportion free of death and myocardial infarction with initial medical therapy (medical, 75% vs. surgical, 68%; p = 0.04) although long-term survival remained unaffected (medical, 84% vs. surgical, 83%; p = 0.75). There were no significant differences either in survival and freedom from nonfatal myocardial infarction, whether stratified on presence of heart failure, age, hypertension, or number of vessels diseased. Thus, 10-year follow-up results confirm earlier reports from CASS that patients with left ventricular dysfunction exhibit long-term benefit from an initial strategy of surgical treatment. Patients with mild stable angina and normal left ventricular function randomized to initial medical treatment (with an option for later surgery if symptoms progress) have survival equivalent to those patients randomized to initial surgery.     

Late follow-up after repair of left ventricular aneurysm and (usually) associated coronary bypass grafting

This study assesses clinical and operative data (LV) aneurysm was repaired to determine factors that might predict in-hospital and long-term outcome. Long-term follow-up study was obtained in 296 of 298 patients undergoing LV aneurysm repair with or without coronary artery bypass grafting between 1974 and 1986. No patient had sustained a myocardial infarction within 2 weeks of surgery or was undergoing other concurrent cardiac surgery. The average age of the study patients was 57 +/- 9 years and the average ejection fraction was 35 +/- 13%. Ninety percent of the patients underwent concurrent bypass grafting, with an average of 2.2 +/- 1.3 grafts placed. Fourteen (5%) patients died in the hospital, with most deaths attributable to LV dysfunction. Advanced age and less extensive revascularization were correlates of in-hospital mortality. The 10-year survival was 57%, myocardial infarction-free survival 43%, and freedom from death, myocardial infarction and reoperative coronary surgery 41%. Advanced age, systemic hypertension, significant left main coronary artery narrowing and emergent operative status were multivariate correlates of long-term mortality. A low-risk population was defined by the absence of these risk factors, and high-risk by the presence of greater than or equal to 1 risk factors. The 10-year survival was 71% in the low-risk and 41% in the high-risk groups (p = .0006). The 10-year myocardial infarction free survival was 55% in the low-risk and 31% in the high-risk groups (p = 0.0017). LV aneurysm repair may be performed with acceptable in-hospital mortality, and the long-term risk may be stratified.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cardiogenic shock: a summary of the randomized SHOCK trial

Cardiogenic shock is the most common cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial randomly assigned 302 patients with predominant left ventricular failure following an acute myocardial infarction to a strategy of emergency revascularization or initial medical stabilization. Emergency revascularization by either coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty was required within 6 hours of randomization. Patients assigned to initial medical stabilization could undergo delayed revascularization at a minimum of 54 hours post-randomization. The primary end point of the study was 30-day all-cause mortality. Overall survival at 30 days did not differ significantly between the emergency revascularization and initial medical stabilization groups (53% vs. 44%; p=0.109). However, at the 6- and 12-month follow-up, there was a significant survival benefit with early revascularization (50% vs. 37%; p=0.027 and 47% vs. 34%; p=0.025, respectively). The benefit appeared to be greatest for those less than 75 years of age, with 20 lives saved at 6 months per 100 patients treated. According to the results of the SHOCK trial, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for myocardial infarction now recommend emergency revascularization for patients younger than 75 years with cardiogenic shock.     

Favorable early and long-term prognosis following coronary bypass surgery therapy for myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter trial. TAMI Study Group

Coronary bypass surgery was performed before hospital discharge on 82 (21%) of 386 consecutive patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) multicenter trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Time from infarct symptom onset to coronary bypass surgery was 7.3 +/- 1.9 hours for 24 patients operated upon on an emergency basis and 9.3 +/- 5.2 days for 58 patients having late in-hospital surgery. There were no operative deaths and five in-hospital deaths in the surgical group, all of which occurred in patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Although patients in the surgical group were older (59.7 +/- 10.4 years versus 54.9 +/- 10.2 years; p = 0.03), had more extensive coronary artery disease (42% three-vessel disease versus 11%; p = 0.001), and had a higher incidence of anterior wall myocardial infarction (48% versus 39%; p = 0.02), in-hospital mortality for the surgical group (6%) was similar to that in 301 patients not undergoing surgery (7%) in this trial. For patients discharged from the hospital, mortality at 1 year was 2.5% in the surgical group and 1.8% in patients not having coronary bypass surgery before hospital discharge. At a 1 year follow-up, there were no significant differences in the frequency of cardiac or noncardiac-related hospitalizations or in event-free survival between surgical and nonsurgical groups. The majority of patients in both groups considered themselves to be in excellent or good condition. Coronary bypass surgery can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates in close temporal association to acute myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ten-year incidence of myocardial infarction and prognosis after infarction. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

BACKGROUND. The 10-year incidence of myocardial infarction (fatal and nonfatal) and the prognosis after infarction were evaluated in 686 patients with stable angina who were randomly assigned to medical or surgical treatment in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS. Myocardial infarction was defined by either new Q wave findings or clinical symptoms compatible with myocardial infarction accompanied by serum enzyme elevations with or without electrocardiographic findings. Treatment comparisons were made according to original treatment assignment; 35% of the medical cohort had bypass surgery during the 10-year follow-up period. The overall cumulative infarction rate was somewhat higher in patients assigned to surgery (36%) than in medical patients (31%) (p = 0.13) due to perioperative infarctions (13%) and an accelerated infarction rate after the fifth year of follow-up (average, 2.4%/yr in the surgical group versus 1.4%/yr in the medical group). The 10-year cumulative incidence of death or myocardial infarction was also higher in surgical (54%) than in medical (49%) patients (p = 0.20). According to the Cox model, the estimated risk of death after infarction was 59% lower in surgical than in medical patients (p less than 0.0001). The reduction in postinfarction mortality with surgery was most striking in the first month after the event: 99% in the first month (p less than 0.0001) and 49% subsequently (p less than 0.0001). The estimated risk of death in the absence of infarction was nearly identical regardless of treatment (p = 0.75). Exclusion of perioperative infarctions did not alter the findings. CONCLUSIONS. Although surgery does not reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction overall, it does reduce the risk of mortality after infarction, particularly in the first 30 days after the event (fatal infarctions).     

Late results of surgical and medical therapy for patients with coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular function

Late survival and freedom from myocardial infarction were determined for 192 patients with coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction at rest (less than or equal to 35%) determined by biplane angiography who were evaluated between 1970 and 1977. Seventy-seven patients had coronary artery bypass grafting and 115 patients were treated medically and were considered surgical candidates. The medical and surgical groups were comparable in all baseline characteristics examined except frequency of three vessel disease and angina pectoris, which occurred in a significantly greater percent of the surgically treated patients (p less than 0.01). Only three medically treated patients (2.6%) underwent coronary bypass grafting in the follow-up period. Seven year actuarial survival was 63% in the surgical and 34% in the medical group (p less than 0.001). Ninety-three percent of patients in the surgical group and 81% of those in the medical group were free of nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.01), and 62 and 33%, respectively, were alive and free of myocardial infarction (p less than 0.001) at 7 years. Significant differences in survival favoring surgical treatment were observed for the subsets of patients with an ejection fraction of 25% or less (p = 0.0002) and 26 to 35% (p = 0.01), and for the subsets with three vessel coronary disease (p less than 0.001), normal left ventricular end-diastolic volume (less than or equal to 100 ml/m2) (p = 0.005) and elevated end-diastolic volume (greater than 100 ml/m2)(p = 0.001). After adjustment for other important prognostic variables, the type of treatment remained significant in predicting the relative risk (medical to surgical) of mortality at 5 and 7 years (2.58 and 2.12, respectively). These data corroborate the trends observed in several randomized trials of medical and surgical therapy in patients with abnormal left ventricular function. If hospital mortality for coronary artery bypass grafting is less than 5%, substantial benefit can be anticipated for the majority of patients with depressed ventricular function.     

Mortality after coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery (the national Medicare experience).

Mortality rates for Medicare patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery were compared with those who had angioplasty or angioplasty and bypass surgery. Two data sets were used for this study: The first contained information on demographic factors, co-morbidities and subsequent mortality on all 96,666 Medicare patients who had bypass surgery or angioplasty in 1985; the second contained additional detailed clinical data collected using the MedisGroups method on a random sample of 2,931 revascularization patients from 6 states. From the national data set 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 3.8 and 8.2% for 25,423 angioplasty patients and 6.4 and 11.8% for 71,243 bypass surgery patients (p less than 0.001 for both time periods). Mortality rates for the MedisGroups data were 4.4 and 8.5% for the angioplasty patients and 6.5 and 11.9% for the bypass surgery patients. After eliminating patients admitted with a myocardial infarction, mortality rates were 1.9 and 6.0% for 632 angioplasty patients and 5.1 and 10.8% for 1,730 bypass surgery patients. The risk-adjusted relative risk of mortality for bypass surgery versus angioplasty was 1.72 (p = 0.001) for all patients, 2.15 (p less than 0.001) for low-risk patients and 0.90 (p = not significant) for high-risk patients. Results suggest that low-risk patients have better survival with angioplasty because of lower short-term mortality.     

Medical and surgical management of early Q wave myocardial infarction. II. Effects on mortality and global and regional left ventricular function at 10 or more years of follow-up

To determine the long-term effect of surgical reperfusion on survival and left ventricular function of patients with anterior and inferior Q wave myocardial infarction, 387 patients were followed up for greater than or equal to 10 years after early Q wave infarction. In the anterior infarction group, 102 received conventional therapy and 101 underwent surgical reperfusion. The overall hospital mortality rate in the medically and surgically treated patients was different (16.7% [17 of 102] versus 6.9% [7 of 101], p less than 0.05). The cumulative 13 year actuarial mortality rate widened between the anterior medical and surgical groups (54% versus 31%, p = 0.0003) by the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. The hospital mortality rate with early reperfusion (that is, less than or equal to 6 h of symptom onset) was 2% (1 of 51), whereas the mortality rate with late reperfusion was 12% (6 of 50). The 13 year actuarial cumulative mortality rate was significantly lower in both the early and late reperfusion groups (30% and 33%, respectively) than in the conventional therapy group (54%, p = 0.0006). The mortality rate in patients receiving surgery after surviving initial medical therapy was 50% (15 of 30). In the survivors of anterior Q wave myocardial infarction, improved global ejection fraction was seen in the patients undergoing early (54 +/- 13%) and late (50 +/- 10%) surgery relative to those receiving conventional therapy (43 +/- 11%, p less than 0.05). Only the early reperfusion group had better regional function of the anterior wall than that of the conventional therapy group. Thus, ventricular function correlated with improved long-term survival. In the patients with inferior Q wave myocardial infarction, the overall hospital mortality rate in the medical and surgical groups was not different (6.1% [6 of 98] versus 4.6% [6 of 86], p = NS). Likewise, the 13 year actuarial cumulative mortality rate was not different between the medical and surgical groups overall (32% versus 30%, p = 0.29) by the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. The hospital mortality rate in the early reperfusion group was lower than that in the late reperfusion group (2.0% [1 of 49] versus 8.1% [3 of 37], p = NS). The 13 year actuarial cumulative mortality rate was lower in the early surgical group compared with that in the medical group (19% versus 32%, p = 0.04). The late surgical group had a similar 13 year actuarial cumulative mortality rate to that of the medical group (47% versus 32%, respectively, p = 0.47).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Late follow-up of 781 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting for an isolated obstruction in the left anterior descending coronary artery

Seven hundred eighty-one patients with isolated left anterior descending coronary atherosclerosis treated with either coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty between January 1980 and December 1984 were studied to determine late survival and event-free survival. Follow-up was complete in 775 patients (99.4%). Actuarial survival at 5 years was 98% for surgical patients and 95% for angioplasty patients (p = 0.02). Five-year event-free survival (freedom from myocardial infarction, bypass grafting, angioplasty, and death) was 93% for surgical patients and 62% for angioplasty patients. This study suggests that the higher initial cost and complexity of bypass surgery may be justified by superior long-term results.     

Results of coronary surgery after failed elective coronary angioplasty in patients with prior coronary surgery

The results of coronary artery bypass surgery after failed elective coronary angioplasty in patients who have undergone prior coronary surgery are unknown. Coronary angioplasty may be performed to relieve angina after surgery either to the native coronary vessels or to grafts. Failure of attempted coronary angioplasty may mandate repeat coronary surgery, often in the setting of acute ischemia. From 1980 to 1989, 1,263 patients with prior coronary bypass surgery underwent angioplasty; of these patients, 46 (3.6%) underwent reoperation for failed angioplasty during the same hospital stay. Of the 46 patients who underwent reoperation, 33 had and 13 did not have acute ischemia. In the group with ischemia, 3 patients (9.1%) died and 14 (42.4%) died or had a Q wave myocardial infarction in the hospital compared with no deaths (p = NS) and no deaths or Q wave myocardial infarction (p = 0.005) in the group without ischemia. At 3 years, the actuarial survival rate was 88 +/- 6% in the group with ischemia, whereas there were no deaths in the group without ischemia (p = NS), and freedom from death or myocardial infarction was 51 +/- 10% in the group with ischemia, versus no events in the group without ischemia (p = 0.006). In most patients with prior coronary bypass surgery, coronary angioplasty was performed without the need for repeat coronary bypass surgery. Should coronary angioplasty fail, reoperation in patients without acute ischemia can be performed with overall patient survival comparable to that of elective reoperative coronary bypass without coronary angioplasty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Medical and surgical management of early Q wave myocardial infarction. I. Effects of surgical reperfusion on survival, recurrent myocardial infarction, sudden death and functional class at 10 or more years of follow-up

To define the outcome of patients given medical or surgical therapy for Q wave myocardial infarction, 387 patients were followed up for 10 to 13 years (mean 11.4). On study entry the groups had similar distributions for variables such as mean age, gender, previous myocardial infarction, abnormal creatine kinase activity, area of infarction, number of vessels diseased and clinical classification. The hospital mortality rate of the medical versus surgical group was 11.5% (23 of 200) versus 5.8% (11 of 187) (p = 0.07). Early reperfusion (that is, less than or equal to 6 h) resulted in a lower mortality rate than did medical therapy--2% (2 of 100) versus 11.5% (23 of 200) (p less than 0.05)--whereas the hospital mortality rate with late reperfusion was 10.3% (9 of 87). The long-term mortality rate of the medical and surgical groups was 41% (82 of 200) versus 27% (51 of 187) (p = 0.0007) with use of an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. In the survivors, the differences between medical and surgical groups in recurrent myocardial infarction, mortality associated with reinfarction and sudden death were prospectively followed and evaluated by the life table method. Recurrent myocardial infarction was not prevented by surgical reperfusion or medical therapy (23% in both groups), however, the mortality rate in patients with recurrent infarction was higher in the medical therapy group--36.6% (15 of 41) versus 17.5% (7 of 40) (p = 0.04). The mortality difference did not depend on early or late surgical reperfusion. In the in-hospital survivors, the incidence of sudden death was 17.5% in the medical (31 of 177) versus 7.4% (13 of 176) in the surgical group (p = 0.01). This difference was much more pronounced in the early reperfusion group. Functional class was significantly lower than that for medical therapy in the early reperfusion but not the late reperfusion group. Thus, in comparable groups given medical and surgical therapy for acute myocardial infarction and followed up for greater than or equal to 10 years, surgical reperfusion appears to offer improved longevity in selected cases (when implemented early) but does not prevent recurrent myocardial infarction. The associated mortality with recurrent myocardial infarction is less as is the incidence of sudden death. Finally, lower functional class occurs most often in patients given early reperfusion.     

Medical versus surgical treatment of unstable angina

A prospective, nonrandomized data bank study of the effect of medical versus surgical management of patients with unstable angina included all patients with unstable angina seen at 1 hospital over an 8 year period. Patients were entered into the study after an initial 5 day period of medical treatment. Entry characteristics were similar in 104 surgical patients and 124 medical patients. The mean follow-up period was 52 months. The operative mortality rate was 2% (2 of 104). The incidence of operative infarction was 13% (13 of 104). Twentyseven medical patients (22%) had late surgery for progressive angina without operative mortality. Seven year survival (Mantel-Haenszel) was 65% for the medical group and 85% for the surgical group when analyzed by initial treatment (p = 0.012). Analysis by the crossover method where crossover medical patients are followed up only to the date of surgery yielded similar results (p = 0.008). Nonsurvivors were compared with survivors and had a higher incidence of the following entry characteristics: (1) age greater than 60 years; (2) diastolic blood pressure greater than 89 mm Hg; (3) ST-T changes in the resting electrocardiogram; (4) 3 vessel disease; (5) elevated left ventricular diastolic pressure (at rest); and (6) elevated left ventricular diastolic pressure (exercise). None had single vessel disease. The incidence of infarction (fatal and nonfatal) in 5 years was 17% in the medical group and 22% in the surgical group. In the latter group 13% had a perioperative infarct and 9% had a late infarct. Symptom relief was greater in the surgical group. At 5 years 62% had no angina and only 8% had severe angina compared with 37% and 24%, respectively, in the medical group. Thus surgical management of selected patients with unstable angina appears preferable to medical therapy in view of improved survival and greater symptom relief. Whereas the total incidence of infarction was not reduced this was, in part, related to a 13% incidence of perioperative infarction. Improved methods of myocardial protection have since reduced this incidence to 3.0% in our hospital.     

Coronary artery surgery in the first 24 hours after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis and angioplasty in the first hours after myocardial infarction minimize necrosis, leading to better early and late survival, but these therapies have limited effect in patients with three-vessel disease and cardiogenic shock. Emergency coronary surgery is an alternative treatment in some cases. AIM: To assess perioperative complications, mortality and long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary surgery within 24 h of myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 57 patients undergoing surgery within 24 h of the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction between 1982 and 1998. Multiple vessel disease was present in 31 patients (54%), shock or cardiac arrest in 19 (33%) and coronary angiography complications in 7 (12%). The mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery was 6.32 h. At the beginning of surgery 32 patients (56%) were hemodynamically stable, 15 (26%) were in shock and 10 (17%) were in cardiac arrest. RESULTS: The operative mortality was 0% for those who were hemodynamically stable at the start of surgery and 44% (11 of 25 patients) for those in shock or cardiac arrest.Shock or prior cardiac arrest were associated with higher rates of sternal infection and heart failure and longer hospital stays.Follow-up (mean 67 months) was possible for all remaining patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 89 and 82%, respectively, for patients who were hemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Five-year survival was 55%, however, for those who underwent surgery in shock or cardiac arrest. The overall rate of freedom from myocardial infarction, angioplasty or reoperation was over 95% at 5 years and over 85% at 10 years of follow-up. Age and shock or cardiac arrest were risk factors for a poor long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: The early and long-term outcome of coronary surgery within 24 h of myocardial infarction is good for patients who are hemodynamically stable when surgery begins. Shock and cardiac arrest are important risk factors for complication and death. Coronary artery bypass grafting is a good treatment option in the first hours after myocardial infarction.     

Short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for stable and unstable angina pectoris

The first 840 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed in the same institution were retrospectively assessed at an average follow-up period of 25 months after the initial procedure. The study population consisted of 506 patients with stable angina pectoris (group 1) and 334 patients with unstable angina pectoris (group 2). Clinical end points were death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina pectoris necessitating bypass surgery or repeat PTCA, and event-free survival. The two groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, previous myocardial infarction, ejection fraction, and number of diseased vessels. PTCA was successful in 83.0% of group 1 and 87.1% of group 2. Follow-up rates were expressed as events per attempted PTCA in a patient group. No difference in survival was observed between the two groups, the mortality rate being approximately 2.8% at 25 months. In the group with stable angina pectoris there was a lower incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction within the first 24 hours after angioplasty; 4.3% vs 9.0% (p less than 0.01). During long-term follow-up the increase in the incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction was similar, resulting in an overall long-term follow-up infarction rate of 8.3% and 14.2%, respectively (p less than 0.01). A higher event-free survival was observed in group 1 within 24 hours after PTCA: 93.7% vs 84.2% (p less than 0.01). During subsequent follow-up the difference in event-free survival between the two groups was no longer significant: 68.5% vs 61.2%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures

The results of 127 left main (LM) coronary angioplasties were reviewed to assess short- and long-term effectiveness. Three major subgroups were considered: (1) elective "protected" (defined as the presence of a patent bypass graft to the left coronary circulation) patients (n = 84); (2) elective "unprotected" patients (n = 33); and (3) acute patients, in whom LM coronary angioplasty was performed in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (n = 10). Successful LM dilation was achieved in 94% of elective patients and 90% of acute patients. Procedural mortality was 4.3% in elective patients (2.4 and 9.1% in protected and unprotected patients, respectively, p = 0.14) and 50% in the acute subgroup. Long-term follow-up data, available for 98% of patients, revealed actuarial 3-year survival rates of 90 and 36% in elective protected and unprotected subgroups, respectively (p less than 0.0005). In the acute subgroup, 3 patients (30%) were alive at the time of follow-up; all had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. Thus, although elective angioplasty of an unprotected LM coronary artery is technically feasible, the long-term prognosis of such patients is very poor. LM angioplasty in this subgroup should be reserved for patients in whom surgical revascularization is not an option. In contrast, elective angioplasty of a protected LM coronary artery can be accomplished safely with good long-term results. LM coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction can be effective as a salvage procedure; however, adjunctive coronary bypass surgery is important for long-term survival.     

Cardiac factors predictive of 10-year survival after coronary surgery]

Although the predictive factors of postoperative mortality after coronary artery surgery are well known, those predictive of long-term survival have received less attention. This study reviews the outcome of a group of 480 patients between 50 and 65 years of age, operated between 1984 and 1986. The patients were classified in two groups according to the presence or absence of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: Group I (304 patients with saphenous vein bypass grafts alone) and group II (176 patients with an internal mammary artery +/- saphenous vein bypass grafts). The long-term results were assessed according to 3 criteria: isolated cardiac mortality: cardiac mortality associated with a repeat revascularisation procedure and cardiac mortality associated with reoperation or recurrence of angina. Cardiac survival at 10 years was significantly better after internal mammary-LAD bypass: 91.4% (CI 87.1-95.1) than after saphenous vein bypass grafting alone: 79.6% (CI 74.8-84.4) (p = 0.012). Univariate analysis identified the following poor predictive factors: three vessel disease (p = 0.03), preoperative left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction inferior to 45% (p = 0.0001), incomplete revascularisation (p = 0.0003), use of venous bypass graft alone (p < 0.014) and perioperative infarction (p = 0.0254). For each criterion of survival (cardiac isolated or associated with a new revascularisation and/or recurrence of angina), multivariate analysis identified three independent predictive factors of long-term extramortality: not using internal mammary artery-LAD bypass graft, incomplete revascularisation and preoperative hypertension. This study confirms the beneficial effects of internal mammary-LAD artery grafting on long-term survival after coronary artery surgery, and also demonstrates the prejudicial effects of hypertension.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat bypass surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia: AWESOME randomized trial and registry experience with post-CABG patients

OBJECTIVES: This report compares long-term percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) survival among post-CABG patients included in the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME) randomized trial and prospective registry. BACKGROUND: Repeat CABG surgery is associated with a higher risk of mortality than first-time CABG. The AWESOME is the first randomized trial comparing CABG with PCI to include post-CABG patients. METHODS: Over a five-year period (1995 to 2000), patients at 16 hospitals were screened to identify a cohort of 2,431 individuals who had medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five high-risk factors. There were 454 patients in the randomized trial, of whom 142 had prior CABG. In the physician-directed registry of 1,650 patients, 719 had prior CABG. Of the 327 patient-choice registry patients, 119 had at least one prior CABG. The CABG and PCI survivals for the three groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The CABG and PCI three-year survival rates were 73% and 76% respectively for the 142 randomized patients (75 and 67 patients) (log-rank = NS). In the physician-directed registry, 155 patients were assigned to reoperation and 357 to PCI (207 received medical therapy); 36-month survivals were 71% and 77% respectively (log-rank = NS). In the patient-choice registry, 32 patients chose reoperation and 74 chose PCI (13 received medical therapy); 36-month survivals were 65% and 86% respectively (log-rank test p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention is preferable to CABG for many post-CABG patients.     

Initial and long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy in unprotected left main coronary artery

Angioplasty in the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) has been controversial. Recently, several studies have suggested that new procedures and devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) and stents may change this situation. Although there are many reports of unprotected LMCA stenting, there are few reports of DCA of this lesion. Therefore, initial and long-term results were evaluated in 101 patients who underwent DCA for unprotected LMCA in our hospital. Emergency procedures were performed in 15 patients and electively in 86 patients. Scheduled angiographic follow-up was routinely performed, and all patients were clinically followed for >4 months after DCA. Technical success was achieved in 99%, and in-hospital outcomes were cardiac death (2%), noncardiac death (4%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (1%), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (8.9%), coronary artery bypass grafting (0%), and repeat angioplasty (4%). In-hospital results varied considerably, depending on presentation. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the emergency, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and high-risk surgical subgroups. The angiographic restenosis rate was 20.4% at follow-up, and its predictor was postminimal lumen diameter by multivariate analysis. Mean clinical follow-up was 2.8 years; estimated 1- and 3-year survival rates were 87% and 80.7%, respectively. The cardiac survival rate of the low-risk surgical subgroup was significantly higher than that of the high-risk surgical subgroup (p <0.05). Thus, our data show that DCA can be performed safely and effectively in unprotected LMCA with an acceptable low restenosis rate and high survival rate.     

Late results of combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery

The incremental risk of coronary bypass surgery was analyzed in 718 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement between 1971 and 1983. Ninety-eight patients (14%) had significant coronary artery disease requiring coronary bypass surgery. In 70 of these patients, the origin of the mitral valve disease was nonischemic, whereas 28 patients had ischemic mitral regurgitation unsuitable for conservative valve surgery. There were six operative deaths (9%) and four perioperative myocardial infarctions (6%) after mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery for nonischemic mitral valve disease. Operative mortality was related to low output cardiac failure before operation or perioperative myocardial infarction. Actuarial curves predict survival (+/- standard error) of 55 +/- 7% at 5 years and 43 +/- 8% at 10 years. Preoperative functional class was the only significant predictor of long-term survival in this group (p less than 0.05). The actuarial survival of the 620 patients without coronary artery disease who underwent mitral valve replacement alone was 63 +/- 3% at 10 years. This was significantly better than that of the 70 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery for nonischemic mitral valve disease (p less than 0.001). Conversely, 5 year survival of the 28 patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation was 43 +/- 10%. This confirms the negative detrimental effect of an ischemic origin of mitral valve disease on survival after mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery (p less than 0.0001).     

Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up

Objectives. This study compared the long-term clinical results of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with internal thoracic artery grafts with those in patients with vein grafts only.Background. Aortocoronary artery bypass surgery has been performed for >25 years, primarily utilizing the saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery as conduits. Although the internal thoracic artery has been shown to confer a clinical advantage, it is not known for how many years this benefit will continue.Methods. All consecutive patients undergoing initial coronary artery bypass surgery between 1970 and 1973 were followed for up to 20 years. Clinical evaluation included survival, late myocardial infarction, need for reoperation and recurrence of angina. Patients were analyzed in three groups: vein grafts only (214 patients); a single internal thoracic artery graft with or without associated vein grafts (490 patients); and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts (39 patients). Use of the operating microscope was also analyzed with regard to effect on survival.Results. The internal thoracic artery graft and use of the operating microscope were independent predictors of mortality and reduced the risk of dying by a factor of 0.68 and 0.76, respectively. An internal thoracic artery graft resulted in a mean survival of 4.4 years longer than that with vein grafts alone. The internal thoracic artery graft compared with vein grafts was associated with fewer reoperations (p < 0.001), fewer late myocardial infarctions, lower associated mortality rates (p < 0.04) and less early recurrence of angina (p = 0.03).Conclusions. The internal thoracic artery graft and use of the operating microscope confer a superior clinical advantage over the saphenous vein graft throughout a 20-year follow-up period. The advantage of an internal thoracic artery graft does not decrease with time, suggesting that the choice of conduit at the initial operation is more important clinically than progression of coronary artery disease.