Nested restriction site-specific PCR to detect and type hepatitis C virus (HCV): a rapid method to distinguish HCV subtype 1b from other genotypes

Genotypic differentiation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become an integral part of clinical management and epidemiologic studies of hepatitis C infections. Thus, it is extremely important in areas such as the Czech Republic, where current instrumentation and kits for assessing HCV infection are too costly for widespread use. We describe a new and relatively inexpensive method called nested restriction site-specific PCR (RSS-PCR) that generates a "fingerprint" pattern to represent an HCV genotype without the use of restriction endonucleases and that specifically differentiates HCV genotype 1b from the other HCV genotypes. The RSS-PCR method was applied directly to serum samples from patients with hepatitis C from the Czech Republic and from patients with known HCV genotypes from the United States. The method was validated by comparison of the subtype determined by RSS-PCR to the subtype determined from analysis of the 5' noncoding region (NC) or the nonstructural protein gene (NS5b) nucleotide sequence of HCV in these clinical samples. From 75 Czech samples containing HCV RNA, three distinct RSS-PCR patterns were observed; 54 were predicted to contain subtype 1b, 19 were predicted to contain subtype 1a, and 2 were predicted to contain subtype 3a. Among 54 samples predicted to contain HCV genotype 1b, all were confirmed by their 5' NC or NS5b sequences to be subtype 1b. Thus, both the sensitivity and specificity of the RSS-PCR test for the differentiation of HCV subtype 1b from the others were 100%. While the assay described here was designed to specifically differentiate HCV subtype 1b from the other HCV genotypes, the RSS-PCR method can be modified to differentiate any HCV genotype or subtype of interest. Its simplicity and speed may provide new opportunities to study the epidemiology of HCV infections and the relationship between HCV genotypes and clinical outcome by more laboratories throughout the world.     

Hepatitis C virus genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymerase chain reaction products generated with a HCV detection kit

Highly conserved sequence in the 5' untranslated region(UTR) of hepatitis C virus(HCV) genome have been targeted by most nucleic acid amplification-based detection assays, such as Amplicor HCV test, a commercially available assay kit. In this study, we classified HCV genotypes by direct sequencing determination for 5' UTR of nested-PCR after Amplicor HCV test. Then, based on the results of sequence, RFLP analysis after digestion of the nested PCR fragments with Hae III or Sau 3AI to classify HCV genotype was evaluated. RFLP analysis distinguished the type 1, 2a and 2b. Only one of 29 samples was not classified by RFLP analysis due to the point mutation of Hae III recognition site. HCV genotypes commonly found in JAPAN were classified into three types, 1b, 2a, and 2b. Also, RFLP analysis requires fewer resources than serotype grouping test. Hence, the present method provides an adaptable and rapid HCV genotyping in clinical laboratory in JAPAN.     

Comparison of hepatitis C virus NS5b and 5' noncoding gene sequencing methods in a multicenter study

A national evaluation study was performed in 11 specialized laboratories with the objective of assessing their capacities to genotype hepatitis C virus (HCV) and define the applicability of a given genotyping method. The panel consisted of 14 samples positive for HCV RNA of different genotypes (including 3 samples with two different artificially mixed genotypes) and 1 HCV-negative sample. Seventeen sets of data were gathered from the 11 participating laboratories. The sensitivities ranged from 64.3 to 100% and from 42.7 to 85.7% for the methods that used sequencing of the NS5b region and the 5' noncoding (5' NC) region, respectively. When the data for the artificially mixed samples were excluded, NS5b genotyping gave correct results for 80% of the samples, 1.7% of the samples were misclassified, and 18.3% of the samples had false-negative results. By 5' NC-region genotyping methods, 58.3% of the results were correct, 29.7% were incomplete, 8.3% were misclassifications, 1.2% were false positive, and 2.4% were false negative. Only two procedures based on NS5b sequencing correctly identified one of the three samples with mixtures of genotypes; the other methods identified the genotype corresponding to the strain with the highest viral load in the sample. Our results suggest that HCV 5' NC-region genotyping methods give sufficient information for clinical purposes, in which the determination of the subtype is not essential, and that NS5b genotyping methods are more reliable for subtype determination, which is required in epidemiological studies.     

Genotyping and resistance profile of hepatitis C (HCV) genotypes 1-6 by sequencing the NS3 protease region using a single optimized sensitive method

The objective was to develop a method of NS3 gene sequencing that allowed simultaneous genotyping and protease inhibitor (PI) resistance profiling of HCV genotypes 1-6. To validate the use of a unique RT-PCR for genotypes 1-6 and evaluate its sensitivity, the NS3 protease region was amplified from 140 plasma samples from patients infected with HCV without previous PI therapy. In parallel, NS5b sequences were obtained. Amplification of NS3 was successful in 139/140 samples (99%). For the 135 samples with both NS5b and NS3 sequencing results, phylogenetic analysis showed concordance of genotypes with a bootstrap >90% for each cluster. PI resistance mutations were analyzed using the Geno2pheno [hcv] v1.0 tool. For the 63 genotype 1 (G1) Nantes clinical strains, 12 (19%) presented a natural resistance mutation. This proportion was higher (p<0.05) than that observed in a sample of 374 G1 reference sequences. This significant difference was observed only in subtype 1b (n=7; 25% against n=19; 8%). In conclusion, this tool allows determination of both HCV genotype and identification of PI-resistance mutations. It can be used to detect pre-existing resistance mutations in NS3 before treatment and follow the emergence of resistant viruses during therapy.     

Serological determination of hepatitis C virus genotype: comparison with a standardized genotyping assay.

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype could be routinely run in the future to tailor treatment schedules. The suitabilities of two versions of a serological, so-called serotyping assay (Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-3 [SA1-3] and Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-6 [SA1-6]; Murex Diagnostics Ltd.), based on the detection of genotype-specific antibodies directed to epitopes encoded by the NS4 region of the genome, for the routine determination of HCV genotypes were studied. The results were compared with those of a molecular biology-based genotyping method (HCV Line Probe Assay [INNO-LiPA HCV]; Innogenetics S.A.), based on hybridization of PCR products onto genotype-specific probes designed in the 5' noncoding region of the genome, obtained with pretreatment serum samples from 88 patients with chronic hepatitis C eligible for interferon therapy. Definitive genotyping was performed by sequence analysis of three regions of the viral genome in all samples with discrepant typing results found among at least two of the three assays studied. In all instances, sequence analysis confirmed the result of the INNO-LiPA HCV test. The sensitivity of SA1-3 was 75% relative to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping for 92% of the samples typeable by SA1-3. The sensitivity of SA1-6 was 89% relative to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping for 94% of the samples typeable by SA1-6. Overall, SA1-6 had increased sensitivity relative to SA1-3 but remained less sensitive than the genotyping assay on the basis of PCR amplification of HCV RNA. Cross-reactivities between different HCV genotypes could be responsible for the mistyping of 8 (SA1-3) and 6% (SA1-6) of the samples. Subtyping of 1a and 1b is still not possible with the existing peptides, but discriminating between subtypes may not be necessary for routine use.     

Development of an improved genotyping assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes in Pakistan

A new genotyping system was established for the specific detection of HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a–h, 5a and 6a during the course of this study. The system is based on entire core region and a part of 5′ noncoding region (5′NCR) with genotype-specific primers. Genotype-specific primers were designed on the basis of 114 HCV isolates. Serum samples with known genotypes were used as positive controls to validate the assay developed and to generate PCR band patterns. Band patterns generated from the clinical serum samples from HCV patients were compared to the patterns produced from these control samples. In addition, the type-specific bands were sequenced from the test patients and control clinical samples to validate further the test results. To determine sensitivity and specificity of the assay, a total 260 samples were analyzed simultaneously by this HCV genotyping method and that developed by Ohno and Murex HCV Serotyping 1–6 Assay. The system showed 79.2% concordance with Ohno's system and 65.38% with serotyping system. Samples with discordant results were sequenced and their genotypes were determined by molecular evolutionary analysis. The data indicate that the method described in this study may offer better sensitivity and specificity for the detection directly of HCV genotypes present at low levels in HCV patient samples.     

Genotyping of hepatitis C virus types 1, 2, 3, and 4 by a one-step LightCycler method using three different pairs of hybridization probes

Determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes has become increasingly important during the last years for prediction of the clinical course and the outcome of antiviral therapy. Therefore, numerous different methods have been developed to enable HCV genotyping. However, many of them are very laborious and expensive, leading to limited usage in daily routine diagnostics. We have established a method which combines the speed of the new LightCycler technology with the use of amplification products generated for diagnostic quantitative HCV RNA determination. Differentiation of HCV genotypes is performed with these amplicons in a single step by using fluorophore-labeled hybridization probes. Although currently only two different acceptor fluorophores are available for the LightCycler, types 1, 2, 3, and 4, which are by far the prevailing HCV genotypes in Europe and the United States, can be distinguished. Genotypes of specimens from 190 chronically HCV-infected patients were determined by the LightCycler method and compared with the results of nucleotide sequencing. Concordant results were obtained for all samples. This new method offers a fast and convenient possibility to determine the quantitative HCV RNA load and the genotype in large-scale settings within about 4 h.     

Molecular epidemiology of HCV genotypes among injection drug users in Taiwan: Full‐length sequences of two new subtype 6w strains and a recombinant form_2b6w

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1) circulating recombinant form (CRF) 07_BC strain has caused serious outbreaks among injection drug users in Taiwan since 2004. The objective of this study was to conduct a molecular epidemiological study of HCV genotypes in intravenous drug users in Taiwan. Blood samples and questionnaires from 591 intravenous drug users infected with HIV‐1 were collected nationwide. In total, 180 samples were selected for HCV genotyping using multiplex PCR and phylogenetic analysis of the core, E1 and NS5B regions. The Inno‐Lipa assay was used to confirm multiple infections with different genotypes. Eighty percent had a single infection with subtype 1b being the most common subtype (24%), 12% had double infections and two had triple infections. In addition, three recombinant forms (RFs)‐2a1a, 3a1b, and 2b6w were identified. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the 3a, 6a, and 6n strains were clustered with strains present in Thailand and mainland China. Full‐length sequence analysis showed that two 6w strains shared 89.4–90.2% sequence homology with the 6(r) strain from the Guangdong Province, China. Bootscan analysis revealed that the recombination breakpoint of RF_2b6w was located at the NS2‐NS3 junction. In summary, the distribution of HCV genotypes among Taiwanese intravenous drug users was complex and more than 12% of the drug users were infected with more than one genotype of HCV. J. Med. Virol. 82:57–68, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Serological Determination of Hepatitis C Virus Subtypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 4a by a Recombinant Immunoblot Assay

Serological determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtypes has been hampered by the lack of suitable assays. Therefore, a recombinant immunoblot assay has been established for serological differentiation of HCV subtypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 4a. It consists of recombinant HCV proteins from the NS-4 region propagated in Escherichia coli. To confirm the serotyping assay results, the results were compared with those obtained by nucleotide sequencing of the NS-5 region. Sera from 157 patients with chronic HCV infection were examined by this assay, and specific antibodies could be detected in 86% (n = 135) of them. The HCV genotype was determined correctly in all but one sample, and the subtypes determined by the serotyping assay corresponded to the HCV subtypes detected by nucleotide sequencing for 95% (n = 128) of the samples. These data indicate that HCV subtypes can be distinguished serologically. The assay that is described provides an easier means of identification of infection with different HCV subtypes for wider clinical and epidemiological applications.     

PREVALENCE OF HEPATITIS C VIRUS (HCV) COINFECTION IN HIV INFECTED INDIVIDUALS IN SOUTH INDIA AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HCV GENOTYPES

Purpose: To determine anti-HCV antibodies and genomic subtype of HCV in 1487 confirmed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive samples. Methods: A total of 1487 confirmed HIV-positive samples were tested for anti-HCV antibodies by using a third generation ELISA kit (Ortho 3.0) and by RT PCR for HCV. HIV and HCV coinfected samples were selected for HCV genotyping by RFLP and subtyping with NS5-type specific primers. Results: A total of 1487 HIV-infected serum samples were screened for HCV infection, of which, a 1443 (97.04%) were negative and 45 (3.02%) were coinfected. HIV–HCV coinfection was predominant in the age group 41–50 years (51.1%). HCV genotyping and subtyping was done for the 45 HCV RNA-positive specimens of which genotype 1 was observed in 31 (68.8%) and genotype 3 was observed in 14 (31.1%) subjects. Further subtyping analysis showed the genotype 1b in 23 (51.1%), 1a in eight (17.7%), 3a in 10 (22.2%) and 3b in four (8.8%) subjects. Conclusion: HIV and HCV seroprevalence is higher in South India, and the most prevalent genotype in coinfection was genotype 1b.     

Development of "Amplisens-HCV-genotype" reagent set for identification of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a and 3a

Multiple alignments of 119 nucleotide sequences of isolates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) were carried out to choose the type-specific primers for the 5'-ultra-core fragment of viral genome for the purpose of detecting the HCV 1a, 1b, 2a, and 3a subtypes. A PCR kit of reagents was designed for the amplification of cDNA HCV with selected type-specific primers and for making the electrophoresis in agarous gel. The kit comprises the positive control samples, i.e. HCV genome fragments, subtypes 1a, 1b, 2a and 3a, cloned in the plasmid vector. 440 cDNAHCV samples were simultaneously tested by using the worked out reagents' set and according to the method of Ohno et al. The results were found to be concordant in 336 cases, and were discordant in 4 samples. A sequencing of the PCR products and phylogenetic analysis showed that 1 sample belonged to subtype 4a, 2 samples belonged to subtypes 2k and 1 sample--to subtype 31.     

Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6

The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (line probe assay [LiPA] 2.0), based on reverse hybridization, and the Abbott Realtime HCV genotype II assay (Realtime II), based on genotype-specific real-time PCR, have been widely used to analyze hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, their performances for detecting HCV genotype 6 infections have not been well studied. Here, we analyzed genotype 6 in 63 samples from the China HCV Genotyping Study that were originally identified as genotype 6 using the LiPA 2.0. The genotyping results were confirmed by nonstructural 5B (NS5B) or core sequence phylogenetic analysis. A total of 57 samples were confirmed to be genotype 6 (51 genotype 6a, 5 genotype 6n, and 1 genotype 6e). Four samples identified as a mixture of genotypes 6 and 4 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 3b. The remaining two samples classified as genotype 6 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 1b, which were intergenotypic recombinants and excluded from further comparison. In 57 genotype 6 samples detected using the Realtime II version 2.00 assay, 47 genotype 6a samples were identified as genotype 6, one 6e sample was misclassified as genotype 1, and four 6a and five 6n samples yielded indeterminate results. Nine nucleotide profiles in the 5′ untranslated region affected the performances of both assays. Therefore, our analysis shows that both assays have limitations in identifying HCV genotype 6. The LiPA 2.0 cannot distinguish some 3b samples from genotype 6 samples. The Realtime II assay fails to identify some 6a and all non-6a subtypes, and it misclassifies genotype 6e as genotype 1.     

Serotyping and genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains in chronic HCV infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes can be established by methods based on PCR typing and serological typing. The accuracy of these methods depends on their sensitivity and specificity. These should be compared with the reference method, direct sequencing, and analysis of viral genomes. Among the serologic methods recently developed, the performance of a new serotyping assay (RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, Chiron corporation, Emeryville) was assessed using a panel of 147 well-characterized French isolates from chronic hepatitis C patients. Definitive genotypes of the isolates were established by direct sequencing in 5′ NC and in some cases in NS-5B. HCV serotypes 1, 2, and 3 were determined by measuring type specific antibodies to core and NS-4 derived peptide antigens. Of the 147 sera, serotypic-specific antibodies were detected in 136 (sensitivity, 92.5%). The specificity of the RIBA SIA HCV serotyping assay was 92.6% (including samples with mixed results); without these, the specificity was 80.1%. Analysis of the 28 discrepant samples showed that (1) a different serotype was found in 18 samples including five for genotype 1, three for genotype 2, two for genotype 3, five for genotype 4, and three for genotype 5, and that (2) ten patients showed a reactivity with mixed serotypes, one had circulating antibodies to type 1 or 2, and nine had circulating antibodies to type 1 or 3. In summary, except for genotypes 4 and 5, the results of the test were well correlated (85.7%) with those of direct sequence genotyping. The former test is rapid and does not require the strict HCV RNA storage and preservation conditions of the latter. This new method may thus be considered as an alternative for HCV typing. However, although it is convenient, its lower sensitivity compared to the molecular typing method and the discrepant results limit its routine use in a clinical context. J. Med. Virol. 52:391–395, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Hepatitis C virus genotyping: interrogation of the 5' untranslated region cannot accurately distinguish genotypes 1a and 1b

Although the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR) is the most conserved region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome, it has been suggested that interrogation of this region is sufficient for determination of the HCV genotype. We compared two methods of determination of the HCV genotype: (i) direct sequencing of the DNA of the NS-5b region and (ii) reverse line probe assay (LiPA; INNO-LiPA HCV II; Innogenetics N.V.) of the 5' UTR. There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotype but only 80% concordance for subtype. A significant percentage of genotype 1a isolates were misclassified by LiPA as genotype 1b. Sequence analysis revealed that the only consistent difference in the 5' UTR for these genotype 1a isolates misclassified as genotype 1b was a single nucleotide (A/G) at position -99 of the HCV genome. All isolates with discordant results analyzed had a G at this position, consistent with LiPA determination of these samples as subtype 1b. However, sequence analysis of 222 nucleotides in the NS-5b region clearly identified all of these isolates as subtype 1a. Population distribution data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center of over 200 samples analyzed by sequencing of the NS-5b region and over 1,000 samples analyzed by LiPA also indicated that INNO-LiPA HCV II cannot accurately differentiate HCV genotype 1a isolates from HCV genotype 1b isolates. We provide evidence that the A/G at position -99 represents a sequence polymorphism in the HCV genome that cannot differentiate subtype 1a from subtype 1b isolates. In conclusion, the 5' UTR is not heterogeneous enough for use in determination of the HCV subtype and cannot be used for differentiation of HCV genotypes 1a and 1b.     

Evaluation of a new hepatitis C virus sequencing assay as a routine method for genotyping

The determination of HCV genotypes, subtypes and isolates has been helpful in understanding the evolution and the epidemiology of the virus, and is an important factor in the pre-treatment evaluation. A new simpler and automated sequencing based system has been developed recently, the Visible Genetics TruGene Hepatitis C Assay. The aim of the study was to compare this new genotyping assay with reverse hybridization based Innogenetics INNO-LiPA HCV II assay that is used most commonly. Eighty-eight HCV-RNA positive patients were enrolled and divided in four groups: 26 hemodialysed patients, 30 untreated patients with chronic HCV hepatitis, 12 IFN non-responder patients with chronic HCV hepatitis, 20 asymptomatic HCV positive subjects. The 5'-UTR region was amplified by RT-PCR and the nucleotide sequences determined by the TruGene assay. In parallel, the amplicons were also tested by INNO-LiPA. Concordant results were obtained in 80 out of 88 cases (90.9%). The new assay allowed to genotype 2 samples not typed by LiPA as 1b and 2a/c. The new system also allowed the subtyping of 3 untypable samples, classified as genotype 1 by INNO-LiPA, as genotype 1b (1 sample) and, as genotype 4 (2 samples). The difference between these genotype 4 isolates and the closest genotype 1 isolate was 6 nucleotides. One LiPA genotype 1a sample was typed as 1b and 2 genotype 1b samples were all typed as 1a by the sequence analysis. In conclusion, the new assay is a sensitive and rapid method that is suitable for accurate large-scale genotyping.     

Differentially expressed microRNAs in Huh-7 cells expressing HCV core genotypes 3a or 1b: potential functions and downstream pathways

microRNA (miRNA) dysfunction is believed to play important roles in human diseases, including viral infectious diseases. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection promotes the development of steatosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which is genotype-specific. In order to characterize the miRNA expression profile of Huh-7 cells expressing the HCV core 3a vs. 1b, microarrays and real-time PCR were performed. Consequently, 16 miRNAs (5 miRNAs upregulated and 11 miRNAs downregulated) were found to be dysregulated. In addition, we generated the predicted and validated targets of the differentially expressed miRNAs and explored potential downstream function categories and pathways of target genes using databases of Gene Ontology (GO) and PANTHER and the database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery (David). The computational results indicated that the dysregulated miRNAs might perform the functions of cellular metabolism and cellular growth. Finally, these biological effects were preliminarily validated. This study identifies a specific miRNA expression profile in cells expressing HCV core proteins of different genotypes (genotype 3a and 1b), which may account for the variable pathophysiological manifestation associated with HCV infection.     

从四例丙肝患者系列血清标本分析HCV基因的变异

目的 研究丙型肝炎病人系列血清标本的丙型肝炎病毒（ＨＣＶ）基因型变化及ＨＣＶ膜区基因变异和“准种”现象。方法 对４例因献血感染ＨＣＶ病人的系列血标本，用特异性引物ＰＣＲ扩增检测，５’－ＮＣＲ和核心区测序确定ＨＣＶ基因莳工对标本膜区基因进行克隆重，每个标本随机选择５～９个克隆进行测序分析。结果 发现随着时间推移，存在ＨＣＶ基因型的转换现象。在２种ＨＣＶ基因型转换期存在混合感染。所有测定序列均为１ｂ或     

Improvement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination with the new version of the INNO-LiPA HCV assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates have been classified into six main genotypes. Genotyping methods, and especially the widely used line probe assay (LiPA), are frequently based on the 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR). However, this region is not appropriate for discriminating HCV strains at the subtype level and for distinguishing many genotype 6 samples from genotype 1. We investigated the capacity of a novel LiPA (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay) based on the simultaneous detection of 5'UTR and Core regions for genotypes 1 and 6 to provide correct HCV genotypes (characterized with a phylogenetic analysis) in a set of HCV strains mainly encountered in Western countries. The improvement was assessed by comparing the results to those obtained with the previous version of the assay. Of the 135 tested samples, 64.7% were concordant for genotype group and subtype with sequencing reference results using the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay versus 37.5% with the previous version. The yield was mainly related to a better characterization of genotype 1, since the accuracy, tested in 62 genotype 1 samples, increased from 45.2% with the first version to 96.8% with the new one. However, this new version necessitates a specific PCR and could no longer be used after 5'UTR PCR used for current HCV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the information provided by 5'UTR hybridization is not reliable for correctly identifying the diversity within genotypes 2 and 4. Thus, the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay remains a useful tool for clinical practice when only the discrimination between major HCV genotypes is necessary.