Effects of body position and bolus consistency on the manometric parameters and coordination of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx

The development of a solid-state intraluminal sphincter transducer has alleviated many of the problems associated with manometric studies of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and pharynx (P). We used this technology to study the effect of position (upright vs. supine) on resting UES pressures and the pressure dynamics of the UES/P complex during both wet and dry swallows in 11 normal volunteers and the effects of foods of different consistencies on the UES/P swallow dynamics in 10 normal volunteers. The UES/P coordination parameters were defined as the 15 time intervals that can be measured between any 2 of 6 pertinent points: the beginning, peak, and end of the pharyngeal contraction and the beginning, nadir, and end of the UES relaxation. Data from both the circumferential transducer used to measure sphincter pressures and a standard microtransducer used to measure pharyngeal pressures were collected on-line by an Apple IIe microcomputer and analyzed by programs written in our laboratory. Significant changes in swallow coordination were measured between upright and supine swallows of the same bolus size, between wet and dry swallows in the same position, and among foods of varying consistencies. Resting UES pressure was unchanged by position and pharyngeal contraction pressure was unchanged by bolus size or consistency.     

Biomechanics of cricopharyngeal bars

Patients with a prominent cricopharyngeal bar visible on radiography are generally considered to have spasm of the cricopharyngeus, which is the major muscle component of the upper esophageal sphincter. This condition has been termed "cricopharyngeal achalasia." The aim of this study was to determine the pathogenesis of cricopharyngeal bars. Concurrent videofluoroscopic and manometric examinations of the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter were performed in a cohort of six patients with prominent cricopharyngeal bars and in eight control volunteers. In each subject, swallows of 2-30-mL barium boluses were recorded. The patients with cricopharyngeal bars showed (a) normal peristaltic contraction in the pharynx, (b) normal axial upper esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation, (c) normal flow rate across the upper esophageal sphincter, and (d) normal duration of upper esophageal sphincter opening for different bolus volumes. The major abnormalities in the patients with cricopharyngeal bars were (a) reduced maximal dimensions of the upper esophageal sphincter during the transsphincteric flow of barium and (b) increased intrabolus pressure upstream to the upper esophageal sphincter. Thus, the increase in intrabolus pressure preserved normal transsphincteric flow rates even though the upper esophageal sphincter did not open normally. Overall, the constellation of findings in the patients studied suggests that the underlying pathogenesis of their cricopharyngeal bar was reduced muscle compliance wherein the relaxed cricopharyngeus did not distend normally during swallowing.     

Influence of the viscosity of the swallowed food bolus on the motility of the pharynx

In 9 young men, healthy volunteers, we studied the effect of dry swallows, liquid and paste swallows on the pharyngeal motility. The viscosities of liquids and past were 200 centipoise (cP), 300 cP and 60000 cP, respectively. The bolus volume was 10 ml. For pharyngeal manometry we used two strain-gauge manometric probes taped together, so that a total of six transducers were staggered at 1.5 cm intervals. After its passage through the nose, the assembly was positioned so that all its transducers faced posteriorly, and manometric activity was recorded from oropharynx, hypopharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES). We also recorded infra-hyoid electromiographic activity. The amplitude and duration of the oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal peristaltic pressure complex were not changed by the different boluses. The velocity of peristaltism propagation between oropharynx and UES was slower for paste than for liquids or dry swallows. The increased of viscosity was associated with longer duration of UES relaxation, and greater intrabolus pressure in hypopharynx and UES. The infra-hyoid electromiographic activity was longer for paste than for liquids or dry swallows. These findings suggest that pharyngeal motility is affected by the characteristics of the swallowed bolus.     

Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing

Studies were done on 8 normal subjects with synchronized videofluoroscopy and manometry to facilitate a biomechanical analysis of upper esophageal sphincter opening and volume-dependent modulation during swallowing. Movements of the hyoid and larynx, dimensions of sphincter opening, and intraluminal sphincter pressure were determined at 1/30th-s intervals during swallows of 1, 5, 10, and 20 ml of liquid barium. Our analysis subdivided upper esophageal sphincter activity during swallowing into five phases: (a) relaxation, (b) opening, (c) distention, (d) collapse, and (e) closure. Sphincter relaxation occurred during laryngeal elevation and preceded opening by a mean period of 0.1 s. Opening occurred as the sphincter was pulled apart via muscular attachments to the hyoid such that the hyoid coordinates at which sphincter opening and closing occurred were constant among bolus volumes. Sphincter distention after opening was modulated by intrabolus pressures rather than graded hyoid movement. The generation of intrabolus pressure coincided with the posterior thrust of the tongue that culminated in pharyngeal wall contact and the initiation of pharyngeal peristalsis. Larger volume swallows were associated with greater intrabolus pressure and increased bolus head velocity. The duration of sphincter opening increased in conjunction with a prolongation of the anterior-superior excursion of the hyoid and a delay in the onset of pharyngeal peristalsis (the event that determined the timing of sphincter closure). We conclude that transsphincteric transport of increasing swallow bolus volumes is accomplished by modulating sphincter diameter, opening interval, and flow rate (reflected by bolus head velocity). Furthermore, upper esophageal sphincter opening is an active mechanical event rather than simply a consequence of cricopharyngeal relaxation.     

Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position

Previous studies have demonstrated that nonviscous liquids traverse the esophagus more rapidly with the subject in the upright rather than the supine position. Conversely, similar studies have shown that viscous liquids traverse the esophagus at similar rates for both upright and supine positions. Our purpose was to define the motor correlates of these differing responses. Six normal volunteers were studied with an infused catheter system incorpoating a Dent sleeve for monitoring lower esophageal sphincter pressure. The subjects were given a series of swallows of a water and a viscous (52 centipoise) bolus in both the supine and upright positions. In the upright position, the water bolus caused an increased velocity of propagation in the proximal esophageal segment that was associated with a shortening of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation time and reductions in amplitude and duration of contraction. No significant changes in the peristaltic wave were noted with the viscous bolus during alterations of body position. We conclude that the more rapid transit of a nonviscous water bolus through the esophagus in the upright position is reflected in specific alterations of esophageal peristaltic parameters. The possible mechanisms for these differing responses are discussed.     

Normal esophageal high‐resolution manometry and impedance values in the supine and sitting positions in the population of Northern China

The aim of this study was to investigate the normal high‐resolution manometry and impedance (HRiM) values in the supine and sitting positions in the population of Northern China, and to investigate the influence of different body positions and bolus consistency on esophageal HRiM findings. In this study, healthy volunteers in the supine position underwent esophageal HRiM examination of 10 swallows of 5 mL normal saline solution and 10 swallows of 5 mL synthetic gel of known viscosity, and in the sitting position of an additional five swallows of a synthetic gel of known viscosity. Total bolus transit time (TBTT), complete bolus transit rate (CBTR), distal contractile integral (DCI), distal esophageal amplitude (DEA), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were measured. Sixty‐two healthy volunteers were examined in the supine position and 45 of these performed additional swallows of the viscous gel in the sitting position. In the supine position, normal values for swallowing the liquid and viscous boli were as follows: TBTT 6.9 ± 0.9 and 8.0 ± 1.2 s (P < 0.001), CBTR 90.3 ± 14.0 and 77.9 ± 20.3% (P < 0.001), DCI 1891.5 ± 1131.9 and 1967.8 ± 1140.1 mmHg.s.cm (P = 0.227), DEA 95.3 ± 35.4 and 98.7 ± 37.5 mmHg (P = 0.148), and IRP 10.4 ± 4.9 and 9.0 ± 4.2 mmHg (P < 0.001), respectively. For swallows of the viscous boli in the sitting position, TBTT, DCI, DEA, and IRP were significantly decreased, while CBTR was unchanged (P = 0.075). Normal HRiM values of the population of Northern China were established. Esophageal transit times of viscous boli were significantly slower, more often incomplete and produced less normal peristalsis in the supine position than swallows of liquid boli. Independent reference values for different manometric systems, body positions, and population need to be established before clinical application.     

Effect of Bolus Volume and Viscosity on Pharyngeal Automated Impedance Manometry Variables Derived for Broad Dysphagia Patients

Automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis measures swallow variables defining bolus timing, pressure, contractile vigour, and bolus presence, which are combined to derive a swallow risk index (SRI) correlating with aspiration. In a heterogeneous cohort of dysphagia patients, we assessed the impact of bolus volume and viscosity on AIM variables. We studied 40 patients (average age = 46 years). Swallowing of boluses was recorded with manometry, impedance, and videofluoroscopy. AIMplot software was used to derive functional variables: peak pressure (PeakP), pressure at nadir impedance (PNadImp), time from nadir impedance to peak pressure (TNadImp-PeakP), the interval of impedance drop in the distal pharynx (flow interval, FI), upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation interval (UES RI), nadir UES pressure (Nad UESP), UES intrabolus pressure (UES IBP), and UES resistance. The SRI was derived using the formula SRI = (FI * PNadImp)/(PeakP * (TNadImp-PeakP + 1)) * 100. A total of 173 liquid, 44 semisolid, and 33 solid boluses were analysed. The SRI was elevated in relation to aspiration. PeakP increased with volume. SRI was not significantly altered by bolus volume. PNadImp, UES IBP, and UES resistance increased with viscosity. SRI was lower with increased viscosity. In patients with dysphagia, the SRI is elevated in relation to aspiration, reduced by bolus viscosity, and not affected by bolus volume. These data provide evidence that pharyngeal AIM analysis may have clinical utility for assessing deglutitive aspiration risk to liquid boluses.     

Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry in healthy volunteers

The purpose of this study is to apply combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII‐EM) to test esophageal function during solid swallowing in a normal healthy population. We determined whether combined MII‐EM with solid bolus is more sensitive than that with viscous bolus in the detection of motility abnormality. Eighteen healthy volunteers (11 men and 7 women; mean age 22 years, range 20–26 years) underwent combined MII‐EM with a catheter containing four impedance‐measuring segments and five solid‐state pressure transducers. Each subject received 10 viscous and 10 solid materials. Tracings were analyzed manually for bolus presence time, total bolus transit time, contraction amplitude, duration, and onset velocity. Three hundred and sixty swallows including viscous and solid materials were analyzed. Contraction amplitude for the viscous swallows was higher at 20 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (P= 0.049) but lower at 15 cm above the LES (P < 0.001). Duration of contractions for the solid swallows was longer at 15 cm (P= 0.002) and 10 cm above the LES (P= 0.011) compared with viscous swallows. The total bolus transit time for solid was significantly shorter than that for viscous boluses (6.8 vs. 7.7 seconds, P < 0.001). Bolus presence time appeared to be similar between viscous and solid boluses (except in the proximal esophagus). The percentage of swallows with ineffective peristalsis by manometry, as well as those with incomplete bolus transit by impedance, did not differ between viscous and solid swallows. The proportion of manometrically ineffective solid swallows with incomplete bolus transit was greater than that of viscous swallows (62.1% vs. 34.8%, P= 0.05). Application of solid boluses may potentially enhance diagnostic capability of esophageal function testing. Solid boluses can be regarded as a valuable complement to viscous boluses in the detection of esophageal motility abnormalities when applied with combined MII‐EM.     

Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans

New studies monitoring ambulatory esophageal pressures during food ingestion often compare results to normal values obtained from supine liquid swallows. We compared distal esophageal peristaltic and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures in 15 normal subjects during six liquid swallows in the upright and supine positions, and six solid (small marshmallow) swallows in upright position. LES pressures were significantly ( P <0.05) higher supine than upright but no differences were noted in LES pressure, relaxation, and duration of relaxation between upright solid and liquid swallows. Distal peristaltic wave velocities were faster upright than supine. Peristaltic wave amplitudes, durations, and DP/DT were significantly (P <0.05) greater in supine than in upright position. Atypical wave forms, defined as nontransmitted, simultaneous, and simultaneous/repetitive, increased in the upright position compared to supine (P <0.01), and during solid vs liquid swallows (P <0.05). These results indicate that body position substantially affects normal distal esophageal peristalsis and LES pressure and that abnormal wave forms occur more frequently during swallowing solids than liquids in the upright position. Conclusions regarding abnormal motility over prolonged periods and during food ingestion in patients should be tempered by these findings.This was a junior medical student research project of Victor W. Sears, Jr. Presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 1989.     

Impedance characteristics of esophageal motor function in achalasia

Detailed data on patterns of esophageal bolus transport in patients with achalasia are still lacking. To study these we applied the novel technique of multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements. Ten patients with achalasia were studied using a 16 channel system. Liquid and semisolid boluses of 10 mL were applied with the patients in a supine position. Patterns of bolus transport were determined and analyzed as compared to results obtained from 20 healthy subjects. The healthy subjects featured a unique typical primary peristalsis pattern independent of bolus viscosity. In contrast, achalasia patients demonstrated different impedance characteristics, including: (i) significantly lower baseline esophageal impedance during the resting state as compared with healthy volunteers (999 omega +/- 108 versus 2749 omega +/- 113); (ii) failed bolus transport through the esophagus in all cases; (iii) impedance evidence of luminal content regurgitation in 35% of the swallows (iv) impedance evidence of pathological air movement within the proximal esophagus during deglutition in 38% of the swallows, so called air trapping. Thus, impedance characteristics of achalasia have been defined and can be attributed to known symptoms of achalasia. They can be used as basic findings for further classification of pathological bolus transports in other esophageal motility disorders.     

Esophageal function in humans

We determined the effect of increased bolus consistency on esophageal motor function in 11 healthy volunteer subjects. Further, we sought to define the esophageal response to boluses with a wide range of temperatures in nine healthy volunteers. Intraluminal pressure events were measured with an infused catheter system, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure was monitored continuously with a Dent sleeve. Boluses (10 swallows each) consisting of 5 ml of a solid suspension (yogurt), 5 cm³ of a soft solid (gelatin), and 5 ml of water were given in a randomized order. In a separate study, boluses with temperatures of 1° C, 5° C, 10° C, 15° C, room temperature, 30° C, 40° C, 50° C, and 60° C were given in a randomized fashion. Compared to the water bolus, the solid boluses elicited a significant (P<0.05) reduction in peristaltic wave velocity, which was accompanied by significant (P< 0.05) increments in the durations of wave contraction and lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The magnitude of the response elicited by the solid boluses was comparable to that noted with boluses of high viscosity suggesting that the esophagus responds to increments in bolus viscosity and consistency in a similar fashion. Alterations in bolus temperature did not elicit any significant changes in the parameters of esophageal peristalsis. It is concluded that bolus temperature does not have a significant role in the modulation of human esophageal peristalsis except under conditions that cause a change in esophageal wall temperature.     

Pharyngeal clearance during swallowing: a combined manometric and videofluoroscopic study.

The deglutitive pharyngeal contraction was analyzed using simultaneous videofluoroscopic and manometric studies of eight volunteers. Anterior, posterior, and longitudinal movements of the pharyngeal surfaces, relative to the cervical vertebrae, were measured during swallows of 5 and 10 mL of liquid barium. Profound pharyngeal shortening during bolus transit through the pharynx eliminated access to the larynx and elevated the upper esophageal sphincter to within 1.5 cm of the retrolingual pharynx. Bolus head movement through the pharynx preceded the propagated pharyngeal contraction and registered manometrically as a slight intrabolus pressure before the major pressure complex. Contraction in the horizontal plane began after bolus head transit and culminated with stripping of the bolus tail through the pharynx. Prolonged upper sphincter opening with the larger-volume swallows resulted from a delayed onset rather than altered propagation of the horizontal pharyngeal contraction. It is concluded that the propagated pharyngeal contraction facilitates pharyngeal clearance but has a minimal role in the process of bolus propulsion during swallowing. The propagated contraction works in concert with profound pharyngeal shortening to minimize hypopharyngeal residue after a swallow.     

Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the efficacy and mechanism of solid bolus transit through the esophagus. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were studied with concurrent manometry and videofluoroscopy while swallowing 5 ml liquid barium, a 5-6 mm diameter bread ball, and 4 g chewed bread in both a supine and upright posture. As many as four successive swallows were performed until clearance was achieved. RESULTS: The esophageal clearance of liquid barium was 100% with the first swallow. Clearance of the unchewed bread ball occurred with the first swallow in only 6.7% of trials in the upright posture and 5.9% in the supine posture. After four swallows, clearance was 100% and 52.9% in the upright and supine postures, respectively. Chewed bread was more readily cleared than unchewed bread, with 100% clearance after two swallows in the upright posture and 91% clearance after four swallows in the supine posture. The most common locus of bread stasis was at the aortic arch and carina. The bread boluses were noted to move more effectively when localized in the head as opposed to the tail of the bolus composite. Nonocclusive contractions often occurred at the bolus tail despite the increased peristaltic amplitude seen with the chewed bread. Failed peristalsis, a frequent cause for solid clearance failure, was observed during 30% of all bread swallows. This usually occurred distal to the stopping point of the bolus, suggesting it to be the result rather than the cause of impaired transit. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequently perceived by these normal subjects and in contradistinction to liquid clearance, bread is rarely cleared from the esophagus with a single swallow. Mastication and an upright posture facilitate the esophageal transport of solids. Bolus composition and impaired bolus transit alter the amplitude and conductance of peristalsis. Manometric data pertaining to liquid clearance through the esophagus do not readily apply to bread.     

伊托必利对食管运动障碍NERD患者症状及食管动力的影响

目的 研究伊托必利对伴有食管运动障碍的非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者症状及不同吞咽模式下食管运动功能的影响.方法 按标准选取具有典型胃食管反流症状及食管运动障碍的NERD患者34例,评估其胃食管反流症状,行不同物理性质食团(10次5 ml液体、10次胶体吞咽、10次2×2 ×2 cm固体吞咽)下高分辨率食管测压,给予伊...     

Effect of Bolus Osmolality on Human Esophageal Function

The effect of bolus osmolality on human esophageal function is undefined. We sought to define the response of the human esophagus to boluses with a wide range of osmolalities in 10 healthy male volunteers. Intraluminal pressure events were measured with an infused catheter system, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure was monitored continuously with a Dent sleeve. Each subject was given a series of 10 swallows of each of seven boluses, which consisted of water, mannitol solutions with osmolalities of 142, 296, 449, 704, and 1481 mOsm/kg, and orange juice (585 mOsm/kg), in a randomized fashion. Tracings were coded and analyzed blindly. Alterations in bolus osmolality did not elicit any significant changes in amplitude and duration of contraction, velocity of wave propagation, or the duration of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. We conclude that bolus osmolality does not play a significant role in the control of human esophageal motility, and that this lack of effect is explained by consideration of esophageal muscle mechanics.     

Age effects on the temporal evolution of isometric and swallowing pressure

BACKGROUND: The tongue plays a key role in bolus propulsion through the oropharyngeal chamber. In this study, possible age effects on the magnitude and timing of lingual pressure generation were analyzed. METHODS: Oral pressure was measured during isometric and swallowing tasks for 10 elderly (mean age = 81 years) and 10 young (mean age = 51 years) subjects. Three trials each of the isometric task and swallows of three different boluses (3 ml semisolid, 3 ml liquid, and 10 ml liquid) were performed by each subject. The timing and magnitude of isometric and swallowing pressure generation along with the pattern of the swallowing pressure waveform were analyzed. RESULTS: Whereas maximum lingual isometric pressures decreased with age (p < .001). no significant age difference was found for swallowing pressure. Time taken to reach peak pressure also was reduced with age in both the isometric task and swallows of liquid boluses (p < .05), while no significant age effect was found for semisolid swallows. Finally, only elderly subjects showed a pattern of liquid swallowing pressure generation in which multiple lingual gestures were required to reach peak pressure (termed "pressure building"), a pattern demonstrated by both young and elderly groups for semisolids. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased lingual strength with age combined with unchanging swallowing pressure leads to a decreased "pressure reserve," perhaps leaving older individuals more at risk for dysphagia resulting from insults directly or indirectly to the swallowing system. Additionally, swallowing is generally "slowed" with age, apparently due to both central and peripheral factors, and this change may have an impact on bolus flow outcomes.     

Esophageal contractions and oropharyngeal and esophageal transits in patients with iron deficiency anemia

OBJECTIVE: Patients with iron deficiency may have reduced power of the pharyngeal muscle for bolus propulsion into the esophagus. We hypothesized that esophageal muscle is similarly impaired. METHODS: We studied the oropharyngeal and esophageal transits and esophageal motility of 12 patients (11 women) aged 31-50 yr (median 36 yr) with iron deficiency anemia (serum iron less than 40 microg/dl) and 17 normal volunteers (16 women) aged 26-52 yr (median 37 yr) with serum iron greater than 60 microg/dl. The esophageal motility was studied by the manometric method, with continuous perfusion and 10 swallows of a 2-ml bolus of water alternated with 10 swallows of a 7-ml bolus; and the oropharyngeal and esophageal transits were studied by scintigraphy, with swallows of a 10-ml bolus for the study of oropharyngeal transit and of a 10-ml bolus for the study of esophageal transit. Motility and transit were studied in the supine position. RESULTS: The amplitude, duration and area under the curve of contractions were lower in patients than in volunteers. There were no differences in peristaltic contraction velocity, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and lower esophageal sphincter relaxation duration. There was no difference in oropharyngeal transit. In the esophagus the transit was slower in patients than in volunteers. The time needed by the scintigraphic activity to reach a peak in the proximal esophagus was longer in patients than in volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency may decrease esophageal contractions and impair esophageal transit.     

The Effect of Voluntary Pharyngeal Swallowing Maneuvers on Esophageal Swallowing Physiology

The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether swallowing maneuvers designed to impact pharyngeal physiology would also impact esophageal physiology. Healthy volunteers underwent high-resolution manometry while performing three randomized swallowing maneuvers with and without a 5-ml bolus: normal swallowing, Mendelsohn maneuver, and effortful swallowing. We examined esophageal parameters of peristaltic swallows, hypotensive or failed swallows (“nonperistaltic swallows”), distal contractile integral (DCI), contractile front velocity (CFV), intrabolus pressure, and transition zone (TZ) defect. Four females and six males (median age 39 years; range 25–53) were included in the study. The overall number of nonperistaltic swallows was 21/40 (53 %) during normal swallowing, 27/40 (66 %) during the Mendelsohn maneuver, and 13/40 (33 %) during effortful swallowing. There were significantly more overall nonperistaltic swallows with the Mendelsohn maneuver compared with effortful swallowing (p = 0.003). While swallowing a 5-ml bolus, there were more nonperistaltic swallows during the Mendelsohn maneuver (12/20, 60 %) compared to that during normal swallowing (6/20, 30 %) (p = 0.05) and more peristaltic swallows during effortful swallowing as compared to Mendelsohn maneuver (p = 0.003). Intrabolus esophageal pressure was greater during the Mendelsohn maneuver swallows in the bolus-swallowing condition as compared to normal swallowing (p = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in DCI, CFV, or TZ defect between swallowing conditions. The Mendelsohn maneuver may result in decreased esophageal peristalsis while effortful swallowing may improve esophageal peristalsis. Because it is important to understand the implications for the entire swallowing mechanism when considering retraining techniques for our patients, further investigation is warranted.     

Utility of esophageal impedance in identifying dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis

SUMMARY. This study was intended to assess the utility of combined multiple intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII‐EM) in evaluating reflux patients and in identifying those with esophageal dysmotility. Thirteen controls and 20 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) underwent combined MII‐EM with a catheter containing four impedance‐measuring segments and four solid‐state pressure transducers. Each subject received 10 liquid and 10 viscous boluses to be swallowed. Distal esophageal contraction amplitude was significantly lower in GERD patients than in controls for viscous swallows (58.3 ± 7.3 mmHg versus 82.4 ± 4.1 mmHg, P = 0.005). Total bolus transit time was significantly slower in GERD patients than in controls for liquid swallows (P = 0.035). The percentages of complete bolus transit were significantly lower in GERD patients compared with controls (all P = 0.005). Half of GERD patients with normal EM still had abnormal bolus transit while three‐quarters of those with abnormal EM had abnormal bolus transit. MII helps identify bolus transit abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Combined MII‐EM is clinically useful for detecting esophageal dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis.     

Predictors of Outcome following Cricopharyngeal Disruption for Pharyngeal Dysphagia

The indications for, and predictors of outcome following cricopharyngeal disruption in pharyngeal dysphagia are not clearly defined. Our purpose was to examine the symptomatic response to cricopharyngeal disruption, by either myotomy or dilatation, in patients with oral-pharyngeal dysphagia and to determine pretreatment manometric or radiographic predictors of outcome. Using simultaneous pharyngeal videoradiography and manometry, we studied 20 patients with pharyngeal dysphagia prior to cricopharyngeal diltation (n = 11) or myotomy (n = 8), and 23 healthy controls. We measured peak pharyngeal pressure, hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure, upper esophageal sphincter diameter, and coordination. Response rate to sphincter disruption was 65%. The extent of sphincter opening was significantly reduced in patients compared with controls (p= 0.004), but impaired sphincter opening was not a predictor of outcome. Increased hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressures (>19 mmHg for 10 ml bolus; >31 mmHg for 20 ml bolus) was a significant predictor of outcome (p= 0.01). Neither peak pharyngeal pressure nor incoordination were predictors of outcome. In pharyngeal dysphagia, hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure, and not peak pharyngeal pressure, is a predictor of response to cricopharyngeal disruption. The relationship between intrabolus pressure and impaired sphincter opening is an indirect measure of sphincter compliance which helps predict therapeutic response.