Increased morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with lower extremity trauma and associated injuries: A review of 420,066 patients from the national trauma database

IntroductionThere is a paucity of research addressing the morbidity and mortality associated with polytrauma in elderly patients. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of elderly trauma patients with an isolated lower extremity fracture, to patients lower extremity fractures and associated musculoskeletal injuries.MethodsThis study is a retrospective review from the National Trauma Database (NTDB) between 2008 and 2014. ICD 9 codes were used to identify patients 65 years and older with lower extremity fractures. Patients were categorize patients into three sub groups: patients with isolated lower extremity fractures (ILE), patients with two or more (multiple) lower extremity fractures (MLE) and, patients with at least one upper and at least one lower extremity fracture (ULE). Groups were stratified into patients age 65–80 and patients >80 years of age.ResultsA total 420,066 patients were included in analysis with 356,120 ILE fracture patients, 27,958 MLE fracture patients, and 35,988 ULE fracture patients. The MLE group reported the highest dispatch to ACS level 1 trauma centers at 31.8% followed by the ULE group at 28.5% and the ILE group at 24.7% of patients (p<0.001). The overall rate of complications was highest in the MLE group followed by the ULE and then the ILE group (41.4%, 40.3%, 36.1%, respectively p<0.001). Motility rates in patients >80 years old in the MLE group and ULE group were similar (1.483 vs 1.4432). However, in the 65–80 year group the odds of mortality was 1.260 in the MLE group and 1.450 in the ULE group (p<0.001), such that the odds of mortality after sustaining a MLE fracture increases with age, whereas this effect was not seen in the ULE group.ConclusionPatients who sustained MLE and ULE fractures, had increased mortality, complications and in hospital care requirements as compared to patients with isolated lower extremity injuries. These outcomes are comparable between ULE and MLE fracture patients over the age of 80 however patients 65–80 with ULE fractures had increased mortality as compared patients 65–80 with MLE fractures. Understanding the unique considerations and requirements of elderly trauma patients is vital to providing successful outcomes.     

Rural Hospital Designation Is Associated With Increased Complications and Resource Utilization After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study

BackgroundAs the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis increases, the demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has grown. It is known that patients in rural and urban geographic locations undergo THA at similar rates. This study explores the relationship between geographic location and postoperative outcomes.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, the Truven MarketScan database was used to identify patients who underwent primary THA between January 2010 and December 2018. Patients with prior hip fracture, infection, and/or avascular necrosis were excluded. Two cohorts were created based on geographic locations: urban vs rural (rural denotes any incorporated place with fewer than 2500 inhabitants). Age, gender, and obesity were used for one-to-one matching between cohorts. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, postoperative complications, and resource utilization were statistically compared between the cohorts using multivariate conditional logistic regression.ResultsIn total, 18,712 patients were included for analysis (9356 per cohort). After matching, there were no significant differences in comorbidities between cohorts. The following were more common in rural patients: dislocation within 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.41, P < .001), revision within 1 year (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.32, P = .027), and prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.34, P = .033). Similarly, rural patients had higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.56, P = .041), 90-day readmission (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.26-1.71, P = .023), and extended length of stay (≥3 days; OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.81, P < .001).ConclusionTHA in rural patients is associated with increased cost, healthcare utilization, and complications compared to urban patients. Standardization between geographic areas could reduce this discrepancy.     

Do-Not-Resuscitate status is an independent risk factor for medical complications and mortality among geriatric patients sustaining hip fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after hip fracture surgery between DNR/DNI and full code cohorts to determine whether DNR/DNI status is an independent predictor of complications and mortality within one year. A significant number of geriatric hip fracture patients carry a code status designation of DNR/DNI (Do-Not-Resuscitate/Do-Not-Intubate). There is limited data addressing how this designation may influence prognosis.MethodsA retrospective chart review of all geriatric hip fractures treated between 2002 and 2017 at a single level-I academic trauma center was performed. 434 patients were eligible for this study with 209 in the DNR/DNI cohort and 225 in the full code cohort. The independent variable was code-status and dependent variables included patient demographics, surgery performed, American Society of Anesthesiologists, score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, significant medical and surgical complications within one year of surgery, duration of follow-up by an orthopaedic surgeon, duration of follow-up by any physician, and mortality within 1 year of surgery. One-year complication rates were compared, and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the relationship between independent and dependent variables.ResultsThe DNR/DNI cohort experienced significantly more surgical complications compared to the full code cohort (14.8% vs 7.6%, p = 0.024). There was a significantly higher rate of medical complications and mortality in the DNR/DNI cohort (57.9% vs 36%, p < 0.001 and 19.1% vs 3.1%, p = 0.037, respectively). In the regression analysis, DNR/DNI status was an independent predictor of a medical complication (odds ratio 2.33, p = 0.004) and one-year mortality (odds ratio 9.69, p < 0.001), but was not for a surgical complication (OR 1.95, p = 0.892).ConclusionsIn our analysis, DNR/DNI code status was an independent risk factor for postoperative medical complications and mortality within one year following hip fracture surgery. The results of our study highlight the need to recognize the relationship between DNR/DNI designation and medical frailty when treating hip fractures in the elderly population.     

Quality of fracture reduction is associated with patient survival at one year,but not 30 days,following trochanteric hip fracture fixation. A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionFew studies have been performed to evaluate the association between technical surgical factors and patient outcomes following hip fracture surgery. We performed a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients who had undergone fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using a sliding hip screw (SHS), with the aim of establishing whether there was a correlation between quality of fracture reduction and mortality at 30 days and one year.Patients and methodsA retrospective cohort study was designed. Inclusion criteria were trochanteric (AO 31A1 or 31A2) fractures in patients aged ≥ 65 years, presenting <3 days after injury and fixed using an SHS. Fracture reduction was classified using the Baumgaertner Reduction Quality Criteria (BRQC). A validated predictor of mortality following hip fracture was used to stratify for confounding variables that might affect mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the association between fracture reduction and mortality.Results329 patients were identified (mean age 86, 27% male). 57% had a good reduction, 39% had a fair reduction and 4% had a poor reduction. As reduction grade deteriorated, predicted mortality increased (good reduction: 7.3%; fair reduction: 8.4%; poor reduction: 15.5%). Without adjustment for predicted mortality, there was a significant correlation between decreasing reduction grade and mortality at both time points (30-day: odds ratio 1.95, p = 0.049; one year: odds ratio 1.86, p = 0.003). When adjusted for predicted mortality, only one year mortality remained significant (30 day: odds ratio 1.61, p = 0.173; one year: odds ratio 1.62, p = 0.037).ConclusionSome, but not all, of the association between fracture reduction and mortality can be explained by predetermined predictors of a poor outcome. There remains, however, a correlation between poor fracture reduction and mortality at one year. Every effort must be made to achieve an anatomical reduction for these injuries, and trainees must be instructed in methods to achieve this.     

An analysis of cost and complications for patients sustaining a second,contralateral hip fracture within 1 year

IntroductionHip fractures are an increasingly common occurrence among the aging population. With increased life expectancy and advancements in medicine, patients sustaining a hip fracture are at an increasing risk of sustaining a contralateral hip fracture. Efforts are being made to better understand the environment of these hip fractures so that secondary prevention clinics and guidelines can be made to help prevent recurrent osteoporotic hip fractures. The estimated incidence of a contralateral hip fracture varies from 2 to 10% and is reportedly associated with a higher incidence of complications. Previous studies evaluating contralateral hip fractures compared a single cohort of patients sustaining a second hip fracture with patients who sustained only one hip fracture. We aimed to investigate the overall complications and associated costs as it relates to a patients first hip fracture and contrast this to the same patient's contralateral, second hip fractures.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients in our health systems electronic database who were found to have surgically treated hip fractures between January 2004 and July 2019. Patients with surgically treated hip fractures (CPT Codes: 27235, 27236, 27245, 27244), who sustained a second contralateral hip fracture were included. Medical complications within 30 days of either procedure (such as pneumonia, UTI, altered mental status and others), length of stay, orthopedic complications (such as wound complications, infection, hardware failure, nonunion), type of implants, costs, comorbidities, and ASA Class as well as Mortality were reviewed.ResultsA total of 4,870 hip fractures were identified during the study period where 137 (2.8%) patients sustained a second hip fracture, and 47 (0.9%) of which were sustained within the first year after their index hip fracture. There was no statistical difference in length of stay (p = 0.68), medical (p>0.99) or orthopedic complications (p>0.99) between patients first and second hip fractures. There was an increased incidence of cognitive impairment with the second hip fracture (P = 0.0002). For patients that underwent operative treatment of a second hip fracture, the total cost of care was higher for the second surgery (mean difference 757. 38 USD) however the difference wasn't statistically significant (p = 0.31). The overall 1-year mortality rate was 14.9 percent.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates there is no statistical difference between the first and second surgery regarding length of stay, medical or orthopedic complications and cost.     

Mortality and Complications Following Early Conversion Arthroplasty for Failed Hip Fracture Surgery

BackgroundHip fracture in older patients leads to high morbidity and mortality. Patients who are treated surgically but fail acutely face a more complex operation with conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated mortalities and complications in patients who experienced failure within one year following hip fracture surgery requiring conversion THA.MethodsPatients aged 60 years or more undergoing conversion THA within one year following intertrochanteric or femoral neck fracture were identified and propensity-matched to patients sustaining hip fractures treated surgically but not requiring conversion within the first year. Patients who had two-year follow-up (91 conversions; 247 comparisons) were analyzed for 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month mortalities, 90-day readmissions, surgical complications, and medical complications.ResultsNonunion and screw cutout were the most common indications for conversion THA. Mortalities were similar between groups at 6 months (7.7% conversion versus 6.1% nonconversion, P = .774), 12 months (11% conversion versus 12% nonconversion, P = .999), and 24 months (14% conversion versus 22% nonconversion, P = .163). Survivorships were similar between groups for the entire cohort and by fracture type. Conversion THA had a higher rate of 90-day readmissions (14% versus 3.2%, P = .001), and medical complications (17% versus 6.1%, P = .006). Inpatient and 90-day orthopaedic complications were similar.ConclusionConversion THA for failed hip fracture surgery had comparable mortality rates to hip fracture surgery, with higher rates of perioperative medical complications and readmissions. Conversion THA following hip fracture represents a potential “second hit” that both surgeons and patients should be aware of with initial decision-making.     

Postoperative sepsis and septic shock after hip fracture surgery

IntroductionThere is a paucity of research in the rates for sepsis and septic shock in the hip fracture population specifically, despite marked clinical and prognostic differences between these conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, risk factors, and mortality rates for sepsis and septic shock as well as evaluate potential infectious causes in the surgical hip fracture population.MethodsThe ACS-NSQIP (2015–2019) was queried for patients who underwent hip fracture surgery. A backward elimination multivariate regression model was used to identify risk factors for sepsis and septic shock. Multivariate regression that controlled for preoperative variables and comorbidities was used to calculate the odds of 30-day mortality.ResultsOf 86,438 patients included, 871 (1.0%) developed sepsis and 490 (0.6%) developed septic shock. Risk factors for both postoperative sepsis and septic shock were male gender, DM, COPD, dependent functional status, ASA class ≥3, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Unique risk factors for septic shock were CHF and ventilator dependence. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% in aseptic patients, 16.2% in patients with sepsis, and 40.8% in patients who developed septic shock (p < 0.001). Patients with sepsis (OR 2.87 [95% CI 2.37–3.48], p < 0.001) and septic shock (OR 11.27 [95% CI 9.26–13.72], p < 0.001) had increased odds of 30-day mortality compared to patients without postoperative septicemia. Infections that preceded a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock included urinary tract infections (24.7%, 16.5%), pneumonia (17.6%, 30.8%), and surgical site infections (8.5%, 4.1%).ConclusionsThe incidence of sepsis and septic shock after hip fracture surgery was 1.0% and 0.6%, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 16.2% in patients with sepsis and 40.8% in patients with septic shock. Potentially modifiable risk factors for both sepsis and septic shock were anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and surgical site infections preceded the majority of cases of sepsis and septic shock. Prevention, early identification, and successful treatment of sepsis and septic shock are paramount to lowering mortality after hip fracture surgery.     

Patient body mass index modifies the association between waiting time for hip fracture surgery and in-hospital mortality: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPatient body mass index (BMI) plays an important role in stress exposure, especially in elderly patients with hip fracture. However, how BMI modifies the relationship between the waiting time for surgery and mortality remains unclear.MethodsWe investigated the association between waiting time and mortality using a nationwide multicenter database of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were complications. We performed prespecified subgroup analysis with stratification by BMI.ResultsOverall, 305,846 patients (mean age, 83.5; standard deviation [SD], 8.2); women, 79.5% (n = 243,214) were included in our study. A cubic spline curve revealed two inflection points in the association between waiting time and mortality, and we statistically divided patients into three groups accordingly: the reference group (80,110 patients [26.2%] who waited 1 day for surgery), the delayed group (184,778 patients [60.4%] who waited 2–6 days for surgery), and the extremely delayed group (40,958 patients [13.4%] who waited more than 6 days for surgery). Multivariable logistic regression models showed that the odds of mortality in the delayed group was 14% higher than that in the reference group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.14; p = 0.002), whereas the odds of mortality in the extremely delayed group was 52% higher than that of the reference group (aOR, 1.52; p < 0.001). Patients with lower BMI were more negatively affected by delayed surgery compared to patients with normal BMI (p for interaction = 0.002). Respiratory disorders were most frequent and the spline curve was accordant with in-hospital mortality.ConclusionPatients underwent surgery within 1 day, particularly with lower BMI, had a lower mortality than normal BMI. To optimize limited health care resource, patient's BMI should be considered for hip fracture management, and further investigation in prospective study should be needed to address causal relationship.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level III.     

Perioperative mortality and morbidity of hip fractures among COVID-19 infected and non-infected patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeHip fractures among elderly patients are surgical emergencies. During COVID-19 pandemic time, many such patients could not be operated at early time because of the limitation of the medical resources, the risk of infection and redirection of medical attention to a severe infective health problem.MethodsA search of electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) with the keywords “COVID”, “COVID-19″, “SARS-COV-2”, “Corona”, “pandemic”, “hip fracture”, “trochanteric fracture” and “neck femur fracture” revealed 64 studies evaluating treatment of hip fracture in elderly patients during COVID-19 pandemic time. The 30-day mortality rate, inpatient mortality rate, critical care/special care need, readmission rate and complications rate in both groups were evaluated. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.3.ResultsAfter screening, 7 studies were identified that described the mortality and morbidity in hip fractures in both COVID-19 infected (COVID-19 +) and non-infected (COVID-19 −) patients. There were significantly increased risks of 30-day mortality (32.23% COVID-19 + death vs. 8.85% COVID-19 − death) and inpatient mortality (29.33% vs. 2.62%) among COVID-19 + patients with odds ratio (OR) of 4.84 (95% CI: 3.13 – 7.47, p < 0.001) and 15.12 (95% CI: 6.12 – 37.37, p < 0.001), respectively. The COVID-19 + patients needed more critical care admission (OR = 5.08, 95% CI: 1.49 – 17.30, p < 0.009) and they remain admitted for a longer time in hospital (mean difference = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.74 – 5.45, p < 0.001); but there was no difference in readmission rate between these 2 groups. The risks of overall complications (OR = 17.22), development of pneumonia (OR = 22.25), and acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute respiratory failure (OR = 32.96) were significantly high among COVID-19 + patients compared to COVID-19 − patients.ConclusionsThere are increased risks of the 30-day mortality, inpatient mortality and critical care admission among hip fracture patients who are COVID-19 +. The chances of developing pneumonia and acute respiratory failure are more in COVID-19 + patients than in COVID-19 ‒ patients.     

Medium-term mortality after hip fractures and COVID-19: A prospective multi-centre UK study

PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3–4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection. Typically, death from COVID-19 infection occurs between 15 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms, but this period can extend up to 8 weeks. This study aimed to assess the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on 120-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture.MethodsA multi-centre prospective study across 10 hospitals treating 8% of the annual burden of hip fractures in England between 1st March and 30th April, 2020 was performed. Patients whose surgical treatment was payable through the National Health Service Best Practice Tariff mechanism for “fragility hip fractures” were included in the study. Patients’ 120-day mortality was assessed relative to their peri-operative COVID-19 status. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.ResultsA total of 746 patients were included in this study, of which 87 (11.7%) were COVID-19 positive. Mortality rates at 30- and 120-day were significantly higher for COVID-19 positive patients relative to COVID-19 negative patients (p < 0.001). However, mortality rates between 31 and 120-day were not significantly different (p = 0.107), 16.1% and 9.4% respectively for COVID-19 positive and negative patients, odds ratio 1.855 (95% CI 0.865–3.978).ConclusionHip fracture patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection, provided that they are alive at day-31 after injury, have no significant difference in 120-day mortality. Despite the growing awareness and concern of “long-COVID” and its widespread prevalence, this does not appear to increase medium-term mortality rates after a hip fracture.     

Prognostic Role of Serum Albumin,Total Lymphocyte Count,and Mini Nutritional Assessment on Outcomes After Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BackgroundHip fracture is a significant health risk for older adults and malnutrition indicates hip fracture risk.MethodsWe evaluated whether nutrition status could predict clinical outcomes and mortality after hip fracture surgery in older adults. MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published until July 1, 2018, in patients with serum albumin or total lymphocyte count (TLC) at admission, nutritional status by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and in-hospital follow-up. Data extracted were analyzed using random-effects or fixed-effects models.ResultsNineteen studies with 34,363 adults aged 74-85 years receiving hip fracture surgery were eligible for inclusion. Among these studies, 13 were screened for low albumin, 4 were evaluated for TLC, and 4 for nutritional status by MNA. Hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with higher total mortality and higher risk of in-hospital death (both P < .001). Low TLC and MNA results “at risk of malnutrition” (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval = 1.28-2.18) and “malnourished” nutritional status (hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI = 1.81-3.88) also were significantly associated with higher total mortality (all P < .001).ConclusionLow serum albumin level is a sole indicator for increased risk of in-hospital death, postoperative complications, and total mortality after hip fracture surgery in older adults. Low TLC and malnutrition classified by MNA predict increased mortality. These indicators provide valuable prognostic information and routine use may be prudent.     

Pathologic Versus Native Hip Fractures: Comparing 30-day Mortality and Short-term Complication Profiles

BackgroundA large body of research on native hip fractures has resulted in several evidence-based guidelines aimed at improving postsurgical care for these patients. In contrast, there is a paucity of data on pathologic hip fractures, and whether native hip fracture protocols are generalizable to this population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare mortality rates and complication profiles between patients with pathologic and native hip fractures.MethodsUsing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we identified patients who underwent surgical treatment for pathologic and native hip fractures from 2007 to 2017 and 2601 matched pairs were identified using propensity scoring. Baseline covariates were controlled for, and rates of 30-day postoperative complications and mortality were compared using McNemar’s test.ResultsPathologic hip fracture patients experienced significantly higher rates of death (6.3% vs 4.3%, P < .001), serious adverse events (17.3% vs 13.5%, P < .001), minor complications (34.3% vs 29.1%, P < .001), extended postoperative lengths of stay (30.2% vs 25.9%, P < .001), readmissions (11.9% vs 8.4%, P < .001), thromboembolic complications (3.0% vs 1.6%, P < .001), and perioperative transfusions (31.5% vs 26.4%, P < .001) compared to native hip fracture patients.ConclusionPathologic hip fractures result in significantly higher complication rates than native hip fractures after surgical treatment, suggesting that guidelines for native hip fractures may not be generalizable for pathologic hip fractures. Orthopedic surgeons should closely monitor these patients for deep vein thrombosis, utilize blood sparing techniques, and employ a multidisciplinary approach to help manage and prevent a more heterogenous profile of postsurgical complications.     

Frailty defined by 19 items as a predictor of short-term functional recovery in patients with hip fracture

IntroductionMany hip fracture patients have decreased functional status inhibiting recovery to pre-fracture functional status. The prevalence of frailty in patients with hip fracture is high, but little is known how frailty is associated with functional recovery. The aim of this study was to determine whether frailty can predict functional recovery and clinical outcomes during the acute phase in hip fracture.Patients and MethodsThis study was retrospective observational study from two acute hospitals. Participants were recruited from hip fracture patients who underwent surgery. The main exposure was frailty defined using 19-item modified Frailty Index (mFI). The main outcome was functional recovery, evaluated by postoperative efficiency on the motor-Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complication and discharge disposition. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed using each outcome as a dependent variable and mFI as an independent variable.ResultsSample included 274 patients (mean age 83.7 ± 7.4 years, female 80.7%). Patients with higher mFI exhibited lower functional recovery, defined by efficiency on the motor-FIM score, and tended to run into complications and not return home (P < .001). In multiple logistic regression analyses, higher mFI was significantly associated with increased likelihood of lower functional recovery (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.32–1.93; P < .001), occurrence of postoperative complication (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13–1.54; P < .001) and not returning home (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.38–2.26; P < .001).ConclusionsFrailty defined by 19-item mFI can predict short-term functional recovery during acute phase following hip fracture. Frailty is also associated with postoperative complication and discharge disposition.     

Which patients are at risk for not receiving anti-osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture?: An ACS NSQIP analysis

BackgroundScreening and management of osteoporosis is often only considered by providers when patients present with multiple fragility fractures. The objective was to determine which patients are at risk for not receiving anti-osteoporotic medication and screening immediately following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for hip fracture.MethodsThe 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture Database was queried to identify patients ≥ 50 years old who underwent ORIF of femoral neck, intertrochanteric hip, and subtrochanteric hip fractures. Patients with concurrent polytrauma, malignancy, and other fragility fractures were excluded. Patients taking osteoporotic medications immediately prior to hospitalization were excluded to prevent an overlap in the screening and/or antiresorptive medication initiation rates. Multi-variate logistic regression was used to assess for factors associated with not receiving anti-osteoporotic medication immediately postoperatively.ResultsA total of 6179 patients were identified of whom 3304 (53.5%) were treated at a facility with a documented standardized hip fracture care program. Only 28.5% (N = 1766) patients received anti-osteoporosis medication immediately following ORIF. Independent factors associated with increased odds of not initiating bone protective medication were those without a standardized hip fracture care program (odds ratio [OR] 1.80 [1.58–2.06], P < 0.001), length of stay ≤ 5 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.47 [1.28–1.69], P < 0.001), patients waiting > 1 day until operation (odds ratio [OR] 1.35 [1.13–1.60], P = 0.001), patients requiring a mobility aid preoperatively (odds ratio [OR] 1.29 [1.13–1.47], P < 0.001), and patients who could not weight bear as tolerated (WBAT) on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) (odds ratio [OR] 1.25 [1.06–1.47], P = 0.008).ConclusionPatients starting anti-osteoporotic medication immediately following a hip fracture in the United States remains low (28.5%). Standardized hip fracture care programs have the greatest impact with regards to initiating anti-osteoporotic medication following hip fracture.     

The impact of obesity on polytraumatized patients with operatively treated fractures

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on outcomes following operative treatment of fractures in obese polytrauma patients.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study at a level I trauma centre from January 2014 until December 2017. The eligibility criteria were adult (age >= 18 years) polytrauma patients who presented with at least one orthopaedic fracture that required operative fixation. Polytrauma was defined as having an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >= 16. Out of 891 patients, a total of 337 were included with 85 being obese. The primary outcome variable was the total hospital length of stay in days. The secondary outcome variables were the number of patients who had an intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the ICU length of stay in days, the number of patients who had mechanical ventilation, the duration of mechanical ventilation in days, perioperative complications, and mortality.ResultsObesity was associated with increased total hospital stay (36 vs. 27 days; P<0.001), increased ICU stay (13 vs. 8 days; P = 0.04), increased ICU admissions (83.5% vs. 68.6%; P = 0.008) and increased incidence of mechanical ventilation (64.7% vs. 43.7%; P = 0.001). These findings remained statistically significant following adjusted regression models for age, gender, ISS, and injuries sustained. However, the mechanical ventilation duration was not significantly different between both groups on adjusted and unadjusted analyses. However, an increase per unit BMI significantly increases the duration of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.02). In terms of complications, obesity was only associated with an increase in acute renal failure (ARF) on unadjusted analyses (P = 0.004). Whereas, adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that an increase per BMI unit led to a significant increase in the odds ratio for wound infection (P = 0.03) and ARF (P = 0.024).ConclusionsThis study displayed that obesity was detrimental to polytrauma patients with operatively treated fractures leading to prolonged hospital and ICU length of stay. This highlights the importance of optimizing trauma care for obese polytraumatized patients to reduce morbidity. With 41.1% of our population being obese, obesity presents a unique challenge in the care of polytrauma patients which mandates further research in improving health care for this population group.     

Metabolic syndrome and hip fracture: Epidemiology and perioperative outcomes

IntroductionHip fractures and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are becoming major global healthcare burdens as populations age. This study sought to determine the impact of MetS in hip fracture patients on perioperative outcomes following operative fixation or arthroplasty.MethodsData from the 2004–2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to select 3,348,207 discharges with hip fracture. MetS patients were identified by having at least 3 of 4 component comorbidities: hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and diabetes. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for the association between MetS and perioperative outcomes adjusted for age, gender, race, payer status, and comorbidities.ResultsOverall, 32% of hip fracture patients were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), 28% hemiarthroplasty (HA), 18% closed reduction with internal fixation (CRPP), and 3% primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The remaining 19% of cases were either treated via unspecified procedure of hip repair (9%), managed non-operatively (2%), underwent multiple procedures during the hospital stay (6%), or the surgical procedure data was missing (2%) and were excluded from procedural analyses. The prevalence of MetS was 7.9% and increased among minorities, patients treated at urban hospitals, with comorbidities (heart failure, kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease), and with Medicare coverage. MetS was associated with increased odds of any adverse event (p < 0.0001), specifically: acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, acute posthemorrhagic anemia. MetS was also associated with increased LOS (p < 0.0001) and increased total charges (p < 0.0001). However, MetS was associated with reduced odds of postoperative pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, surgical site infection, septicemia, and in-hospital mortality (p < 0.0001). The above associations were maintained for MetS patients stratified according to their treatment groups: HA, CRPP, and ORIF.ConclusionsMetS is associated with increased odds of complications in hip fracture patients but decreased odds of in-hospital mortality. This may be related to patients’ nutritional status and catabolic states in the perioperative period.     

Base Deficit ≥ 6 within 24 h of Injury is a risk factor for fracture nonunion in the polytraumatized patient

BackgroundPolytrauma patients are at risk for fracture nonunion, but the reasons are poorly understood. Increased base deficit (BD) is associated with hypovolemic shock. Although shock delays bone healing in animal models, there have been no clinical studies evaluating the impact of BD on nonunion risk.Materials and MethodsPatients age ≥ 16 with injury severity score > 16 that presented to an academic Level One trauma center with an operative femur or tibia fracture were reviewed. Clinical notes and radiographs were assessed to determine fracture healing status. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, BD, and number of packed red blood cell transfusions were recorded. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of multiple risk factors associated with nonunion were conducted to investigate the association of BD with nonunion.ResultsThe union group was comprised of 243 fractures; there were 36 fractures in the nonunion group. The following predictors were associated with nonunion: smoking (p = 0.009), alcohol use (p < 0.001), open fracture (p < 0.001), and treatment for deep infection at fracture site (p = 0.016). Additionally, worst BD over 24 h ≥ 6 (p = 0.031) was significant for nonunion development. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed worst BD ≥6 over 24 h remained significantly associated with the development of nonunion (odds ratio 3.02, p = 0.011) when adjusting for other risk factors.ConclusionsA BD ≥ 6 within 24 h of admission was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing lower extremity fracture nonunion in polytrauma patients, even after adjusting for multiple other risk factors. Acute post-traumatic acidosis may have effects on long-term fracture healing.     

Incidence,mortality, and complications of acute myocardial infarction with and without percutaneous coronary intervention in hip fracture patients

IntroductionAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common cause of death following hip fracture surgery. This study aimed to determine the incidence and timing of perioperative AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in hip fracture patients, and to compare in-hospital mortality and complications between hip fracture patients who did not have an AMI, those who sustained a perioperative AMI and did not undergo PCI, and those who sustained an AMI and underwent PCI.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried from 2010 through the third quarter of 2015 to identify all patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: perioperative AMI but no PCI (no PCI cohort), perioperative AMI with PCI (PCI cohort), and no perioperative AMI or PCI (no AMI cohort). Patient demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital mortality, and complications were compared between cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, procedure, and Elixhauser score was used to assess the relative odds of in-hospital mortality for each cohort.ResultsA total of 1,535,917 hip fracture cases were identified, with 1.9% in the no PCI cohort, 0.01% in the PCI cohort, and 98.0% in the no AMI cohort. In-hospital mortality was lower in the PCI cohort than in the no PCI cohort (8.8% vs. 14%), and was greater for both than in the no AMI cohort (1.6%, p < 0.001 for all). Both the no PCI cohort (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 5.6–6.6) and PCI cohort (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.8–6.0) had increased adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality compared to the no AMI cohort. The PCI cohort had a higher rate of bleeding complications than both other cohorts, and the no PCI cohort had a higher rate of transfusion than both other cohorts.ConclusionsPerioperative AMI both with and without PCI independently increases the risk of mortality in hip fracture patients, with the highest risk of mortality in those with AMI without PCI. Providers should understand the increased morbidity and mortality associated with AMI in hip fracture patients, as well as the risks and benefits of perioperative PCI, in order to better counsel and manage these patients.Level of EvidenceIII     

Medicaid insurance as primary payer predicts increased mortality after total hip replacement in the state inpatient databases of California,Florida and New York

Study objectiveTo confirm the relationship between primary payer status as a predictor of increased perioperative risks and post-operative outcomes after total hip replacements.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAdministrative database study using 2007–2011 data from California, Florida, and New York from the State Inpatient Databases (SID), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Patients295,572 patients age ≥ 18 years old who underwent total hip replacement with non-missing insurance data were collected, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnoses and procedures code (ICD-9-CM code 81.51).InterventionsPatients underwent total hip replacement.MeasurementsPatients were cohorted by insurance type as either Medicare, Medicaid, Uninsured, Other, and Private Insurance. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were compared. Unadjusted rates of in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, LOS, 30-day, and 90-day readmission status were compared. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for our outcomes using multivariate linear and logistic regression models fitted to our data.Main resultsMedicaid patients incurred a 125% increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those with Private Insurance (OR 2.25, 99% CI 1.01–5.01). Medicaid payer status was associated with the highest statistically significant adjusted odds of mortality, any complication (OR, 1.26), cardiovascular complications (OR, 1.37), and infectious complications (OR, 1.66) when compared with Private Insurance. Medicaid patients had the highest statistically significant adjusted odds of 30-day (OR, 1.63) and 90-day readmission (OR, 1.58) and the longest adjusted LOS.ConclusionsWe found higher unadjusted rates and risk adjusted odds ratios of postoperative mortality, morbidity, LOS, and readmissions for patients with Medicaid insurance as compared to patients with Private Insurance. Our study shows that primary payer status serves as a predictor of perioperative risks and that primary payer status should be viewed as a peri-operative risk factor.     

Functional outcome and mortality in nonagenarians following hip fracture surgery

Introduction

The world’s population is ageing and the elderly population itself is growing older. This population shows a high incidence of hip fractures. We performed a retrospective study, reviewing the functional status, postoperative complications and mortality rate of nonagenarians who underwent surgery for hip fracture.

Methods and subjects

56 nonagenarian patients underwent hip fracture surgery in our institution between January 2000 and December 2010. Two of these patients had presented with hip fracture on separate occasions, giving a total of 58 hips for analysis. Patients with open fracture, subtrochanteric fracture, polytrauma and pathological fracture were excluded. The case notes, electronic records and X-rays for all those included in the study were reviewed. The main outcome measures were functional status, postoperative complications and mortality rate at 1 year.

Results

Patients with extracapsular hip fractures were associated with higher risks of postoperative complications (60.7 %; p = 0.037), mortality (25 %; p = 0.003) and more likely to be non-ambulant at 1 year (53.6 vs 16.7 %; p = 0.003). Females were more likely to suffer postoperative complications than males (p = 0.016). 46.6 % of the patients had immediate postoperative complications and most commonly due to urological complications (29.3 %). The 1-year mortality rate was 12.1 %. A notable proportion of patients (65.5 %) remained ambulant 1 year postoperatively, although almost half of the patients (48.3 %) who could ambulate independently pre-injury required a walking aid after hip fracture surgery.

Conclusion

Nonagenarians have good surgical outcomes after hip fracture surgery with low mortality rate. They should be treated similarly as their younger counterparts in terms of decision for surgery. Potential decline in functional status and rehabilitation options should be shared with the patient and family at an early stage.