The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study

PURPOSE: We examine various mechanisms of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 83 consecutive men (mean age 68 +/- 6.6 years) referred for evaluation of persistent post-radical prostatectomy incontinence were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Final diagnosis was based on clinical judgment considering patient history, pad test, voiding diary, free (unintubated) uroflow measurements, video urodynamics and linear passive urethral resistance relation curves. We compared free uroflow and pressure flow obtained with a 7Fr urethral catheter in place, and empirically defined low urethral compliance as at least 10 ml. per second difference between these measurements. RESULTS: Sphincteric incontinence was the most common urodynamic finding, occurring in 73 patients (88%). Detrusor instability was identified in 28 patients (33.7%) and in 6 (7.2%) was the main cause of incontinence. In 2 other patients bladder outlet obstruction (1.2%) or impaired detrusor contractility (1.2%) was the only urodynamic finding. Impaired detrusor contractility was diagnosed by linear passive urethral resistance relation in 82% of cases but considered to be clinically relevant in only a third. In 25 cases (30.1%) low urethral compliance was noted, which we consider nearly synonymous with urethral scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Sphincteric incontinence is the most common urodynamic finding in patients with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence, although other findings may coexist. The most accurate diagnosis is attained when all objective measures are put in perspective with the clinical setting.     

Anastomotic contracture and incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a graded approach to management

PURPOSE: We present a heterogeneous group of men presenting with varying degrees of anastomotic contracture (AC) and associated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following radical prostatectomy. It is particularly important that AC should be resolved before artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, because instrumentation through the AUS can risk erosion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 54 consecutive men who were referred for the management of AC and associated SUI were reviewed. Patient treatment and outcomes were stratified according to their unique characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients underwent radical prostatectomy alone (48), or in combination with radiation therapy (7) or cryotherapy (1). In group 1, 35 patients had previously undiscovered AC, or 1 or more prior contracture incisions (CIs) with SUI. CI and AUS were performed simultaneously in 33 patients and sequentially in 2. In group 2, 7 patients with intractable AC following multiple CIs/dilations and self-calibration, or an indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheter underwent simultaneous (3) or sequential (2) CI/AUS or CI only (2). Five patients required temporary self-calibration. In group 3, in 12 patients with total outlet obliteration recanalization was accomplished with combined antegrade/retrograde endoscopy and CI. Ten patients had re-obliteration, of whom 1 underwent suprapubic diversion and 9 underwent repeat recanalization with placement of a UroLume stent (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minnesota) across the anastomosis. Eight patients underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement 4 to 6 weeks later and 1 awaits an AUS. Of those implanted with an AUS 2 required repeat endoscopic procedures because of recurrent but manageable stent ingrowth. CONCLUSIONS: Most ACs are treated successfully with simultaneous, aggressive CI/AUS. A history of many CIs or long, dense contractures suggest the need for staged management. In those with obliterated outlets we prefer to reestablish patency and if rapid recurrence develops, we place a UroLume stent. Regardless of a history of radiation therapy, continence is restored with an AUS.     

Experience with early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that early catheter removal may be accomplished safely after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystography on postoperative day 4 or 5 in 42 of 67 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy revealed no extravasation in 30 and the urethral catheter was removed (group 1). The control group included 25 patients who did not undergo cystography, and the catheter was removed 14 days postoperatively (group 2). RESULTS: Immediate and late continence was achieved in 14 (46.7%) and 25 (83.3%) cases in group 1, and in 8 (32%) and 22 (88%) cases in group 2, respectively (p>0.05). Catheterization was performed easily without any endoscopic or surgical procedure in 2 patients (6.7%) in group 1 who presented in urinary retention after catheter removal. Wound infection and pelvic abscess developed in 1 case (3.3%). There were no late complications. In group 2 urinary retention developed in 1 patient (4%), wound infection in 1 (4%) and hematuria in 1 (4%). Two patients (8%) had late vesical neck contracture at 4 and 10 months, respectively, which required urethrotomy in 1. In 1 patient (4%) a stricture in the anterior urethra was dilated. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that early catheter removal may be accomplished safely in most patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy, and was not associated with a higher complication rate.     

Intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: To determine the actual effect of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) on postoperative urinary continence we used intraoperative electrophysiological testing to confirm functional preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 85 patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer were studied. During RP NVB preservation was assessed macroanatomically. Electrophysiological testing was then performed to confirm NVB preservation. The NVB was electrostimulated and responses were observed by monitoring intracavernous or intraurethral pressure changes. All patients were classified into 3 groups according to the degree of nerve sparing, that is a bilateral nerve sparing group, a unilateral nerve sparing group and a nonnerve sparing group, based on macroanatomical assessment as well as on electrophysiological assessment. Postoperative continence in each group was then determined. Urinary continence at baseline, and 3 and 6 months postoperatively was studied using a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: With electrophysiological assessment 20.6% of macroanatomically determined NVB preservations were reclassified. Analysis of the data on groups classified accurately by electrophysiological testing showed that the bilateral nerve sparing group maintained postoperative urinary function significantly more than the unilateral nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing groups. However, when only macroanatomical assessment was considered, no significant difference among the groups was found in urinary function. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological assessment revealed that bilateral NVB preservation contributes to early recovery of urinary continence after RP. Thus, intraoperative electrophysiological assessment is useful for predicting postoperative quality of life.     

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: After the pioneering period when only few teams were performing the procedure, the laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy has become widespread with several technical variations. A comprehensive review of the published literature on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed to determine the current state of the art of this surgical innovation in terms of perioperative parameters, functional results and cancer control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: English language, peer reviewed articles published before June 2004 concerning laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were found by MEDLINE query. All articles were analyzed and none were a priori excluded. Conclusions were drawn from series of 50 or more patients. RESULTS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is being performed at multiple centers worldwide using various surgical approaches and technologies. Analysis of perioperative parameters, including surgical blood loss, operative time, complications and convalescence, demonstrated low morbidity and showed a clear trend toward improvement with increased experience. The reported positive surgical margin rates were lower in more recent series. As measured by prostate specific antigen recurrence and disease-free intervals, oncological results and cancer control rates are difficult to ascertain in the immature series published to date. Functional results in terms of postoperative urinary and sexual function appear encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the current operative, oncological and functional results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy appear to approximate those of open radical retropubic prostatectomy. These results justify the considerable interest of the urological community in laparoscopy, as evidenced by its widespread application. Nevertheless, longer followup and more mature data are needed definitively to establish laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as an alternative to the retropubic approach.     

Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy

PURPOSE: In the age of minimally invasive surgery there has been renewed interest in the perineal approach for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. We reviewed recent publications regarding radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) in an effort to define its role in the current management of localized prostate malignancy. At the same time we reviewed the relevant perineal anatomy and surgical approach necessary to perform this operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a review of the literature with respect to RPP and included our own extensive experience with this operation, emphasizing patient selection, the current role of pelvic lymph node dissection, surgical anatomy, oncological outcomes and complications. RESULTS: RPP is an effective treatment for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate with oncological outcomes similar to those of the retropubic technique. In comparison to RRP, patients undergoing RPP have less postoperative discomfort, more rapid return of bowel function, more rapid return to work and a decreased transfusion rate. In addition, RRP is now often performed with cavernous nerve sparing. Prostate specific antigen screening has made the rate of lymph node metastasis low enough to omit lymphadenectomy in many cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is still a role for RPP in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Erectile dysfunction after nerve sparing and incontinence rates are similar to those of RRP. In addition, it is less morbid then RRP without being as technically challenging as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.     

Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters

PURPOSE: A strong association between surgeon, hospital volume and postoperative morbidity of radical prostatectomy has been demonstrated. While better outcomes are associated with high volume surgeons, the degree of variation in outcomes among surgeons has not been fully examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a linked database from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries and federal Medicare claims data, we analyzed outcomes of consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 1996. We focused on variations in several measures of morbidity (perioperative complications, late urinary complications and long-term incontinence) among patients of high volume surgeons, defined as those with 20 or more patients in the study period. After adjusting for hospital, surgeon volume and case mix, we examined the extent to which variations in the rates of adverse outcomes differed among surgeons for all 3 end points. RESULTS: Of the 999 surgeons 16% (159) performed 48.7% (5,238) of the 10,737 radical prostatectomies during the study. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.5%, the major postoperative complication rate was 28.6%, late urinary complications 25.2% (major events 16%) and long-term incontinence 6.7%. For all 3 morbidity outcomes the variation among surgeons in the rate of complications was significantly greater than that expected by chance (p =0.001 for each) after adjustment of covariates. Furthermore, surgeons with better (or worse) than average results with regard to 1 outcome were likely to have better (or worse, respectively) results with regard to the other 2 outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity end points that directly affect quality of life showed significant variability among high volume providers. Surgeons who performed well in 1 area (eg postoperative complications) performed well in others. These results further suggest that variations in surgical technique and postoperative care lead to variations in outcomes after radical prostatectomy, indicating that outcomes of this operation are sensitive to small differences in performance.     

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become standard at our institution based on experience with 260 consecutive cases operated on between January 1998 and December 1999. In view of the favorable short-term outcomes we describe our standardized laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two urologists trained in open retropubic radical prostatectomy and laparoscopy combined their experience to develop a specific technique of nonincisional radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Patients presented with clinical stages T1b to T2 prostate cancer and tumor size was approximately 18 to 130 gm. Operations were performed by 1 senior surgeon and 1 assistant, with the help of a voice controlled robot and with the patient under general anesthesia. The 2, 10 mm. ports and 3, 5 mm. ports were placed in the umbilicus and iliac fossa. The laparoscopic procedure was performed transperitoneally, combining anterograde and retrograde approaches in 7 standardized steps. Urethrovesical anastomosis was performed with 3-zero interrupted sutures tied intracorporeally. Technical details were compiled, summarized and illustrated with schematic views. RESULTS: Operating time was approximately 3 hours for the last 120 cases. Estimated average blood loss was 250 ml. with a transfusion rate of less than 1%. The conversion rate was 0%. Postoperative pain was minimal and analgesics were generally not required by postoperative day 2. The accuracy of dissection and sutures allowed patients to be discharged home without urethral catheterization starting on postoperative day 3. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is now not only feasible, but more importantly reproducible. Each step has been checked and validated, and the procedure is standardized and has definitively replaced the retropubic approach in our practice.     

Histological alterations in cavernous tissue after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy often results in erectile dysfunction because of lesions to the erectile nerves. In this study we evaluated histomorphological alterations in cavernous smooth muscle and collagen content after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 19 patients between 57 and 69 years old with prostate adenocarcinoma and normal erectile function, as reported and validated by RigiScan (UroHealth Systems, Laguna Niguel, California) testing, underwent corpora cavernosa biopsy in the operating room before radical prostatectomy, and 2 and 12 months after surgery. No patient underwent hormone therapy before or after surgery and none was diabetic. Elastic fibers (manual counting), muscle specific actin (immunostaining) and collagen content (computerized morphometric imaging) were measured in the 3 biopsies. RESULTS: In all cases the first postoperative histological assessment revealed some disorganization. Trabecular elastic fibers (p <0.0003) and smooth muscle fibers were decreased and collagen content was significantly increased (p <0.0003) compared with preoperative biopsies. One year after surgery elastic fibers (p <0.0003) and smooth muscle fibers were decreased and collagen content was significantly increased (p <0.0003) compared with the first postoperative biopsy. Moreover, organized collagen and trabecular protocollagen deposits were increased. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosis in the corpora cavernosa after radical prostatectomy probably results from denervation and/or an ischemic process, which is caused in turn by the ligation of anomalous pudendal artery branches or of venous plexuses that drain to or from the corpora cavernosa. Fibrosis and the subsequent loss in elasticity and function of erectile tissue probably together cause erectile dysfunction.     

Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We classified and assessed trends in the incidence, severity and management of perioperative morbidity following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 250 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent transperitoneal LRP, as performed by 2 surgeons (CPP and LMS), between April 2001 and March 2004. The Clavien classification system was used to grade complications for cases completed laparoscopically. RESULTS: In the 246 cases completed laparoscopically 20 grade II, 12 grade III and 2 grade IV complications were noted during a mean followup of 13.7 months (overall complication rate 13.8%). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 2 to 8) and median duration of bladder catheterization was 10 days (range 3 to 36). Postoperative ileus that prolonged hospital stay was the most frequent complication and it occurred in 8 patients (3.3%). Seven patients required blood transfusion (2.8%). Bladder neck contracture was observed in 3 patients (1.2%). A total of 11 complications occurred in the first 50 cases, while 12, 6, 8 and 1 occurred in cases 51 to 100, 101 to 150, 151 to 200 and 201 to 250, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications following LRP are mostly self-limited and grade II or III (94.1%). The incidence of complications and need for conversion to open radical prostatectomy decreased with experience. Uniform reporting and grading of surgical complications via a standardized classification system may permit more meaningful comparisons among different centers and surgical techniques.     

Long-term results of the bulbourethral sling procedure

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term efficacy of the male bulbourethral sling procedure in the treatment of post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1994 and June 2000, 95 patients with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence underwent bulbourethral sling placement with tetrafluoroethylene bolsters at our hospital. Ultimately 71 of these patients responded to our questionnaire and they were classified into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 62 patients who had not undergone prior radiation therapy and group 2 consisted of 9 who had undergone radiation therapy before the sling procedure. Patients were asked to respond to questions regarding continence status as well as the validated Incontinence Quality of Life and International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean followup from the most recent sling procedure was 4 years (range 0.27 to 6.55). Average patient age at questionnaire response was 74 years. A total of 86 procedures were performed on 71 patients. Of the 71 patients 7 underwent either sling removal or artificial urinary sphincter placement and were excluded from questionnaire analysis. Including retightening procedures 68% of the patients (72% of group 1, 43% of group 2) required 2 or less pads daily. Of the patients 36% (42% of group 1 and 14% of group 2) required 0 pads. CONCLUSIONS: The male bulbourethral sling procedure remains an effective treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence at 4-year followup.     

The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: The value of radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer depends on low morbidity and mortality. We assessed whether patient outcome is associated with how many of these procedures are performed at hospitals yearly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which is a stratified probability sample of American hospitals, we identified 66,693 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1989 and 1995. Cases were categorized into volume groups according to hospital annual rate of radical prostatectomies performed, including low-fewer than 25, medium-25 to 54 and high-greater than 54. We performed multivariate logistic regression to control for patient characteristics when assessing the associations of hospital volume, in-hospital mortality and resource use. RESULTS: Overall adjusted in-hospital mortality after radical prostatectomy was relatively low (0.25%). However, patients at low volume centers were 78% more likely to have in-hospital mortality than those at high volume centers (adjusted odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6). Overall length of stay decreased at all hospitals between 1989 and 1995. However, average length of stay was longer and total hospital charges were higher at low than at high volume centers (7.3 versus 6.1 days, p<0.0001, and $15,600 versus $13,500, p<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volumes inversely related to in-hospital mortality, length of stay and total hospital charges after radical prostatectomy. Further study is necessary to examine the association of hospital volume with other important outcomes, including incontinence, impotence and long-term patient survival after radical prostatectomy.     

Brain control of normal and overactive bladder

PURPOSE: Bladder control problems are common but their cause is often unclear. Many investigators have sought causes in the lower urinary tract, but fewer in the supraspinal control system. We have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine brain responses to bladder filling in subjects with normal and with poor bladder control (detrusor overactivity). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cerebral responses to bladder infusion were recorded in 1 male and 11 females without overt neurological abnormality, aged 26 to 83 years. Six had good bladder control and 6 had poor control on prior urodynamics. fMRI was performed while repeatedly infusing and withdrawing liquid into and out of the bladder, and monitoring intravesical pressure. Measurements were made at small and large bladder volumes. RESULTS: fMRI detected activation of many brain regions involved in bladder control, including periaqueductal gray, thalamus, insula, dorsal anterior cingulate, and ventromedial cerebellum. Orbitofrontal cortex, pontine micturition center and preoptic hypothalamus were visible in subgroup analyses. Activations outweighed deactivations and responses became stronger at large bladder volumes. Among subjects with good control, this strengthening of response was prominent in the orbitofrontal cortex. Among those with poor control cortical responses were exaggerated at larger bladder volumes, except in the orbitofrontal cortex, which remained weakly activated. This difference was not due to concurrent detrusor activity. CONCLUSIONS: Poor bladder control is specifically associated with inadequate activation of orbitofrontal cortex. Clinically, frontal cortical lesions cause bladder control problems. This study suggests a similar neurophysiological basis for poor bladder control in the absence of overt neurological lesion.     

Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the impact of body mass index (BMI) and prostate gland size on operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed at our institution from May 2002 to April 2003. Patients who had pelvic lymphadenectomy were excluded. A total of 62 cases were available for analysis. Two cases were converted to open surgery. Perioperative data on each group were recorded, including patient age, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, prostate specific antigen, operative time, EBL, time to regular diet and LOS. Pathology data, including specimen weight, Gleason score and the margin status, were reviewed. Patients were grouped into 3 categories based on obesity, as measured by BMI (25 or less, 26 to 29 and greater than 29 kg/m) and prostatic gland size (less than 30, 30 to 50 g, and greater than 50 gm). Furthermore, an analysis of our initial 20, middle 20 and last 22 cases was also performed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63 years and mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.4. Mean operative time was 247 minutes and average EBL was 413 cc. The average LOS in all groups was 2.2 days. There were no statistically significant differences in operative parameters (operative time, EBL or LOS) among the ideal body weight (BMI 25 kg/m or less), overweight (BMI 26 to 29) and obese (BMI greater than 29) groups. The initial 20 cases, the second 20 and the last 22 had similar operative time, EBL and LOS. The surgical margin positive rate in our series was 17.7% for all stages. Of the patients 82% were completely dry at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patient body mass index (25 or less, 26 to 29 and greater than 29 kg/m) did not have a significant impact on operative or postoperative morbidity. However, a positive correlation between prostate gland size (greater than 50 gm) and EBL approached but did not achieve statistical significance. Laparoscopic prostatectomy can be performed safely in obese patients and patients with a large prostate gland.     

Early release of the neurovascular bundles and optical loupe magnification lead to improved and earlier return of potency following radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Since 1999 we have made 2 modifications in the nerve sparing approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), namely early release of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs) before division of the posterior membranous urethra and the use of 2.5x optical loupe magnification during NVB preservation. We retrospectively reviewed our results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and August 2003, 507 men underwent RRP for prostate cancer. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (CBB). Bilateral nerve sparing procedures were performed in 313 men. Modifications were introduced sequentially to the surgical technique and potency rates were compared to those of patients operated on before these modifications. Patients were divided into groups based on the technique of nerve sparing as group 1 (standard release of the NVB), group 2 (early release of the NVB) and group 3 (early release with loupe magnification). All patients were followed for a minimum of 5 months. Postoperative potency rates were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: Mean followup was 15.9 months. Mean patient age was 56.2 years. The overall potency rate among groups 1, 2 and 3 was 40.5%, 54.8% and 66.1%, respectively. Mean time to potency was 10.7, 8.5 and 2.0 months, respectively. Significant differences were found in the overall potency rate among all groups (p <0.05). Mean time to potency was significantly improved between groups 1 and 3 (p <0.05) and between groups 2 and 3 (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minor modifications in nerve sparing technique lead to improved postoperative potency rates and decreased time to potency in men undergoing RRP.     

Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We determined the incidence of patient self-reported post-prostatectomy incontinence, impotence, bladder neck contracture and/or urethral stricture, sexual function satisfaction, quality of life and willingness to undergo treatment again in a large multicenter group of men who underwent radical prostatectomy. We also determined whether the morbidities of sexual function satisfaction, quality of life and bladder neck contracture and/or urethral stricture are predictable from demographic and postoperative prostate cancer factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-reporting questionnaire was completed and returned by 1,069 of 1,396 eligible patients (77%) who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1962 and 1997. Of the respondents 868 (85.7%) underwent surgery after 1990 and in all prostatectomy had been done a minimum of 6 months previously. Questionnaire results were independently analyzed by a third party for morbidity tabulation and the association of patient reported satisfaction. RESULTS: The patient self-reported incidence of any degree of post-prostatectomy incontinence, impotence and bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture was 65.6%, 88.4% and 20.5%, respectively. The incidence of incontinence requiring protection was 33% and only 2.8% of respondents had persistent bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture. Although incontinence and impotence significantly affected self-reported sexual function satisfaction, quality of life and willingness to undergo treatment again (p = 0.001), 77.5% of patients would elect surgery again. This finding remained true even after adjusting for demographic variables, and the time between surgery and the survey by multiple logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Although radical prostatectomy morbidity is common and affects self-reported overall quality of life, most patients would elect the same treatment again. Impotence and post-prostatectomy incontinence were significantly associated with sexual function satisfaction, quality of life and willingness to undergo treatment again. Bladder neck contracture and/or urethral stricture was associated with willingness to undergo treatment again after adjusting for demographic variables and time from surgery to the survey.