Single fiber EMG and repetitive stimulation of the same muscle in myasthenia gravis

We performed RNS and SFEMG studies of the same muscle in 46 patients with myasthenia gravis. Maximum decrement to 3–5-Hz stimulation before and after maximum voluntary exercise, percentage of action potential pairs with increased jitter and blocking, and mean MCD in each study were compared. A significant decrement (> 10% decrease in CMAP area or amplitude between the first and fourth response) was never found without increased jitter and impulse blocking on SFEMG. Increased jitter, blocking, and mean MCD were each correlated with maximum decrement (r > 0.61, P < 0.0001). We conclude that decrement to RNS and impulse blocking on SFEMG result from the same physiologic phenomenon, and that SFEMG is more sensitive at detecting disordered neuromuscular transmission given its ability to detect impulse blocking at levels below the resolution of RNS and increased neuromuscular jitter when there is not blocking. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

RNS与SFEMG在检测ALS患者神经肌肉接头功能紊乱的比较研究

目的探讨重复神经电刺激(RNS)与单纤维肌电图(SFEMG)在检测肌萎缩侧索硬化(ALS)患者神经肌肉接头功能紊乱中的吻合率及RNS低频递减阳性率与SFEMG指标纤维密度(FD)、颤抖(jitter)、阻滞(block)的关系。方法收集2008-5—2009-4在北京协和医院神经科门诊或病房确诊或拟诊的ALS患者43例,同时行RNS及SFEMG检查。比较RNS与SFEMG在判断ALS患者神经肌肉接头紊乱的敏感性和特异性,并分析RNS低频递减与SFEMG参数指标jitter、block、FD的相关性。结果(1)43例患者中26例RNS(+),占60.5%,17例RNS(-),占39.5%。SFEMG(+)34例,占79.1%,SFEMG(-)9例,占20.9%。其中SFEMG(+)+RNS(+)者共25例,SFEMG(-)+RNS(-)者8例。RNS在判断ALS存在神经肌肉接头受累方面与SFEMG比较有一定的吻合性(Kappa=0.47,P0.01)。(2)RNS阴性和阳性组FD间比较无统计学差异(t=-0.1405,P0.05)。RNS阳性组Block程度明显高于RNS阴性组(χ~2=11.432,P0.01),jitter值也明显高于RNS阴性组(t=2.906,P0.01)。桡神经RNS波幅递减程度与jitter值呈正相关(r=0.626,P0.05)。结论 RNS与SFEMG比较有一定的吻合率。RNS检查灵敏度较高,具有操作简单,费用低,耗时短,无创,不需患者特殊配合,近远端肌肉均可操作,易于推广的特点,对ALS患者的辅助诊断具有意义。     

Diagnostic sensitivity of the laboratory tests in myasthenia gravis.

The diagnostic sensitivity of three laboratory tests [serum antiacetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-ab) assay, the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test, and, the single fiber EMG (SFEMG)] for myasthenia gravis (MG) was compared in 120 patients. In all cases, at least one of the tests was abnormal. SFEMG was the most sensitive test, being abnormal in 92% of cases, followed by the RNS test (77%) and the AChR-ab assay (73%). SFEMG was abnormal in all cases with negative AChR-ab and RNS tests, in 97% of cases with negative AChR-ab assay, in 89% of cases with negative RNS test, and in 89% of cases with mild MG. We conclude that one of these three tests is abnormal in all cases of MG, and that the SFEMG is most sensitive in the diagnosis of MG.     

Electrophysiologic data on myasthenic syndromes of the Lambert-Eaton type. A series of 23 cases]

The electrophysiological data of 23 adult patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) have been reviewed. Lung carcinoma was disclosed in 17. In six cases with an EMG follow-up ranging between one and 17 years no carcinoma was detected. The results of repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNS) were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Low CMAP ulnar amplitude was present in all patients (mean: 1.7 mV). Decremental response at low rate of stimulation (3 Hz) was present in 17/20 (means: 30%). An abnormal incremental response at high rate of stimulation was present in all cases (mean: 826%). The authors emphasize the interest of a 50 Hz stimulation for 4 s. Increase of the 'F-wave' amplitude was noticed in some cases. Electrophysiological changes suggestive of an associated mild neuropathy were noticed in eight patients but H-reflex was present in 3/3 cases. SFEMG abnormalities were found in 6/6 cases. In one case, stimulated SFEMG showed more blockings and an increased jitter with low rate of stimulation. In one case the electrical pattern of RNS could be misinterpreted as myasthenia gravis in one tested muscle only. The author's results suggest that CMAP amplitude and RNS test could be used to appreciate the short-term improvement of LEMS with treatment and in some cases for the long-term follow-up.     

Ten-second exercise is superior to 30-second exercise for post-exercise facilitation in diagnosing Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

An incremental response after brief exercise or high-rate stimulation on the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test is a critical diagnostic criterion for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). This prospective study was performed to determine what duration of exercise shows the highest diagnostic sensitivity for LEMS. The compound muscle action potential amplitude in the abductor digiti quinti muscle was obtained at rest and after 5 s, 10 s, 15 s, 20 s, 25 s, and 30 s of exercise. Incremental responses were compared for the different exercise durations in 24 studies performed in nine LEMS patients. The increment was highest with 5-s and 10-s exercises (244%-243%) and lowest with 30-s exercise (84%). A gradual decrease in the increment was noted from 5- to 30-s exercise. A significant difference in the increment was noted between 5- to 10-s and 20-s to 30-s exercise. There was significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity with the 10-s exercise compared with 30-s exercise at 100% increment and 60% increment levels. Higher increment and diagnostic sensitivity were achieved with 10-s exercise than with 30-s exercise. Thus, 10-s exercise should be the standard protocol for the RNS test for LEMS.     

HTLV‐1–associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis and peripheral neuropathy following live‐donor renal transplantation

Introduction: Our aim in this study was to provide an updated literature review of electrodiagnostic testing in myasthenia gravis and Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Methods: A systematic review of the recent literature was performed using the following key words: myasthenia gravis (MG); Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS); electromyography (EMG); repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS); single‐fiber electromyography (SFEMG); nerve conduction study; and normative values. Results: Several articles supported testing of facial, bulbar, and respiratory muscles in the diagnosis of neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders, including muscle‐specific kinase antibody (MuSK)‐seropositive MG. Several articles supported use of concentric needle EMG as an alternative to SFEMG jitter in disorders of neuromuscular transmission. A limited number of articles addressed measurement of area (vs. amplitude) decrement in RNS and decreasing the threshold of post‐exercise facilitation. Conclusions: Electrodiagnostic testing continues to be useful for diagnosis of MG and LEMS, although the quality of the evidence is not great. This literature review summarizes RNS and jitter measurement of facial and respiratory muscles and use of concentric needle EMG for SFEMG. Muscle Nerve 52:455–462, 2015     

神经电生理检查判断眼肌型重症肌无力的敏感度分析

目的：分析眼肌型重症肌无力（OMG）患者的神经电生理特点,为临床诊断提供有价值的依据.方法：对42例临床诊断为OMG患者进行单纤维肌电图、重复神经电刺激和肌电图检测.结果：伸指总肌的单纤维肌电图34例异常,重复电刺激异常23例;肌电图示14例肌源性损害.结论：OMG患者单纤维肌电图是一种敏感度较高的检测方法,其次为重复神经电刺激,其肌肉检测阳性率高低依次为眼轮匝肌、肱二头肌及小指展肌.     

Use of repetitive nerve stimulation in the evaluation of neuromuscular junction disorders

Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders are characterized by fuctuating muscle weakness. Acquired myasthenia gravis is the most common NMJ disorder with an overall prevalence in United States estimated at 60,000. Depending on the site of neuromuscular transmission failure, NMJ disorders have been classified as: (1) presynaptic (e.g., Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome), (2) synaptic (e.g., cholinesterase inhibitor toxicity), and (3) post-synaptic (e.g., myasthenia gravis). Electrodiagnostic techniques used for investigation of NMJ disorders include repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and single fiber electromyography (SFEMG). Recent literature widely explores the use of SFEMG in the diagnosis and monitoring of myasthenia gravis, but this technique has a lesser role in the daily clinical practice outside of academic institutions. RNS is not as sensitive as SFEMG, but it is the most widely used electrodiagnostic method in the evaluation of suspected neuromuscular transmission disorders. RNS is technically easier and does not require special technical training and skill as SFEMG. Repetitive nerve stimulation was utilized first by Jolly in 1895 using an electrical drum and faradic tetanization to demonstrate a "myasthenic reaction" (weakening muscle contractions). In 1941, decremental response following the repetitive nerve stimulation was described by Harvey and Masland. While the technology has improved tremendously since then, the RNS testing is still based on supramaximal repetitive nerve stimulation and the measurement of decremental (or incremental) responses.     

Evaluation of neuromuscular junction disorders in the electromyography laboratory

Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders may be demonstrated using repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) testing and single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG). RNS testing with low frequency stimulation reduces the safety factor of neuromuscular transmission (NMT) and may elicit decrementing compound muscle action potential (CMAP) responses. Exercise or tetanic nerve stimulation may potentiate acetylcholine release in presynaptic NMT disorders with CMAP facilitation. SFEMG is a selective recording technique assessing MFAPs within the same motor unit. Jitter is increased in NMJ disorders, and is the temporal variability between these MFAPs. Impulse blocking reflects failure of NMT. RNS and SFEMG findings in NMJ disorders are reviewed.     

AAEE Minimonograph #33: electrodiagnostic approach to defects of neuromuscular transmission

Clinical testing for neuromuscular dysfunction is supported by an extensive amount of excellent basic information about normal and abnormal subcellular physiology and ultrastructure. This information provides an essential frame of reference for describing the rationale of single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG). SFEMG in turn helps to explain the more conventional clinical testing of neuromuscular function by repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS). Electrical findings in myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and botulinum intoxication are discussed from the subcellular level via the cellular level (SFEMG) to the integrated responses of whole muscle (RNS) as a rational means of understanding the technique of clinical repetitive nerve stimulation.     

Evaluation of neuromuscular transmission by using monopolar needle electrode

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of single-fibre electromyography (SFEMG) with monopolar electrode (MNPE) in revealing neuromuscular transmission dysfunction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined the extensor digitorum communis muscle by using single-fibre electrode (SFE) and MNPE sequentially, in randomly assigned 20 healthy volunteers and in 17 patients with known myasthenia gravis (MG). The high-pass filter setting was 3 kHz for MNPE. Ten individual jitter values were calculated for each electrode in every muscle. Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test on trapezius muscle was performed on 15 patients. RESULTS: In controls, the mean jitter values were 27 +/- 9 (10-59) micro s with SFE, and 21 +/- 7.2 (9-56) micro s with MNPE (P = 0.001). In the MG group, the mean jitter values were 52.4 +/- 38 (12-221) micro s with SFE, and 51.8 +/- 34.7 (12-179) micro s with MNPE. Both electrodes identified junction dysfunction in 14 patients. RNS revealed decrement in four patients but 11. CONCLUSION: SFEMG with SFE is still the gold standard; however, SFEMG with MNPE is superior to RNS like SFEMG with SFE.     

Correlation between a patient-derived functional questionnaire and abnormal neuromuscular transmission in Myasthenia Gravis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the patient-derived physical function score, as measured by the disease specific Myasthenia Gravis Questionnaire (MGQ), and the score obtained with commonly used generic 36-item questionnaire, the Short-Form health survey (SF-36), with the degree of abnormal neuromuscular transmission measured by Single-Fibre EMG (SFEMG) and repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) patients. METHODS: SFEMG and RNS were performed in the deltoid muscle and SFEMG was also performed in the orbicularis oculi muscle in 45 MG patients. The patients were asked to fill out the MGQ, which has been translated and validated into Swedish, and the SF-36. The sum of MGQ items generates a global MGQ score. Items are also divided into 3 muscle specific domains: generalized, bulbar and ocular. RESULTS: The global MGQ score and generalized domain score of MGQ were strongly correlated with the degree of abnormal neuromuscular transmission, as measured by SFEMG in the deltoid muscle. Scores from ocular and bulbar domains of MGQ were not related to neurophysiological findings. Physical composite scores of SF-36 correlated significantly with the abnormal SFEMG findings in the deltoid. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of disturbed neuromuscular transmission in a proximal limb muscle correlates with a patient's subjective experience of generalized myasthenic dysfunction. SIGNIFICANCE: The observed correlation adds a new dimension to neurophysiological examinations in patients with MG.     

Repetitive hypoglossal nerve stimulation in myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) of the hypoglossal nerve in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and bulbar symptoms (dysphagia, dysarthria). METHODS: Twenty patients with MG and 25 normal controls had RNS of the hypoglossal nerve. All patients also had single fibre electromyography (SFEMG) of the orbicularis oculi and RNS with recordings of the nasalis, trapezius and abductor pollicis brevis muscles. RESULTS: All patients had positive SFEMG studies. Nine patients with bulbar symptoms had positive hypoglossal RNS, including 3 with negative RNS recordings in other muscles. Eleven patients with no bulbar symptoms showed negative hypoglossal RNS, including two with positive RNS recordings from other muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal RNS of the hypoglossal nerve correlates well with bulbar dysfunction and further characterises the extent of neuromuscular transmission defect in MG patients.     

Effect of posture and postural fixation in repetitive nerve stimulation test]

Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test is recognized as being useful in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. We investigated incremental response at high rate stimulation. Healthy 20 median nerves were stimulated with 120% of supramaximal intensity. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was recorded with a surface electrode on the abductor pollicis brevis. In a single stimulus the amplitude of CMAP in the passive and voluntary flexion position of the thumb increased by 8% and 34% compared with that of the mid-position. Nevertheless, the negative potential areas (NPA) of CMAP slightly decreased by 2% and 5%, because of the briefer duration by 10% and 30%. Additionally, the size of the first 4 CMAPs in the non-fixed condition was compared with in the fixed by the examiner's hand in RNS test. With 10 and 20/sec stimulation, NPA decreased by 5% and 12% by the comparison of the fourth value with the first, though the amplitude increased by 9% and 24%. With 20/sec stimulation the fixed condition reduced the increase of amplitude by 24% to 18% and the decrease of NPA by 12% to 4%. Incremental response at high rate stimulation is a classical clinical finding, however, in our study NPA decreased while the amplitude increased, which may relate to the briefer duration. The appreciation of NPA will be desired to reduce the influence of synchronization. Moreover, muscle fiber was investigated in two conditions, shortened in passive flexion and fibrillated in voluntary flexion. Consequently, besides synchronization induced by fibrillation, the position change increasing the elasticity of muscle could play a role in the incremental response. The effect of fixation demonstrated this suggestion and movement of muscles must be minimized by every possible means in RNS test.     

Masseteric repetitive nerve stimulation in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: (1) to develop a method for masseteric repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and to obtain normative data for amplitude and area decrement of the muscle (M) response. (2) To investigate myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with masseteric RNS. Masticatory muscles are frequently affected in MG, but no RNS test is available to investigate this district. METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects and 17 MG patients were examined. The masseteric nerve was stimulated by a monopolar needle (cathode), inserted between the mandibular incisure and the zygomatic arch, and a surface electrode (anode), on the contralateral cheek. Masseteric M response was recorded using surface electrodes on the muscle belly and below the mandibular angle. Stimuli were delivered at 3 Hz in trains of 9, at rest and after isometric effort. RESULTS: Normal subjects: mean amplitude decrement was 0.3+/-1.2% at rest, and 1.9+/-1.3% after isometric effort. Patients: 15 patients (88%) were positive on masseteric RNS; in 3 of these it was the only positive RNS test. The extent of decrement observed in masseter muscle was significantly greater than in trapezius muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Masseteric RNS is a simple and well-tolerated procedure; it offers a new possibility in testing the cranial muscles in disorders of neuromuscular transmission.     

Ocular myastyenia gravis: The diagnostic yield of repetitive nerve stimulation and stimulated single fiber EMG of orbicularis oculi muscle and infrared reflection oculography

For the diagnosis of ocular myasthenia gravis (ocular MG), testing of the muscles close to the affected ones may be important. The relative importance of several methods: stimulated single fiber EMG (stimulated SFEMG), repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNS) of orbicularis oculi muscle, and infrared reflection oculography (IROG) was investigated. Thirty-two patients in whom a diagnosis of ocular MG was considered on clinical grounds were admitted to the study. Based on the results of the three neurophysiological tests, the patients could be divided in three groups: a first group with an abnormal stimulated SFEMG, and an abnormal RNS and/or abnormal IROG; a second group with only a slightly abnormal stimulated SFEMG; and a third group with normal tests in all three tests. The clinical diagnosis of ocular MG was made in all 11 patients of the first group; in 86% (6 of 7) of the patients of the second group; and in 7% (1 of 14) of the patients of the third groups. This study demonstrates that the orbicularis oculi muscle is a suitable muscle for stimulated SFEMG in patients with ocular MG, and that the results obtained with this technique showed a better relation with the clinical diagnosis than those of the two other techniques. We also demonstrate that there is no additional value in studying the jitter with different stimulation rates in patients with suspected ocular MG. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Repetitive nerve stimulation of facial muscles in MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis

To better define electrophysiological abnormalities in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies (Ab), we compared electrophysiological features of 14 MuSK Ab-positive, 73 acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR Ab)-positive, and 22 MuSK and AChR Ab-negative (seronegative) patients with generalized disease. Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) abnormalities were observed in 86% of MuSK Ab-positive and 82% of AChR Ab-positive patients but in only 55% of seronegative patients. RNS decrements in the orbicularis oculi were more common and severe in the MuSK Ab-positive patients than the other two groups. Single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) of the extensor digitorum communis was abnormal in 90% of MuSK Ab-positive patients. The high frequency of RNS abnormalities in facial muscles in the MuSK Ab-positive population reflects the propensity for facial muscle involvement in this form of MG and emphasizes the importance of including facial muscles in RNS protocols when evaluating these patients.     

Diagnostic value of double-step nerve stimulation test in patients with Myasthenia Gravis

ObjectiveDouble-step nerve stimulation test (DSST) is a repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) technique that is performed under exercise and ischemic conditions. We tested the diagnostic significance of DSST at a distal muscle in 17 control subjects and 10 myasthenic patients who had normal conventional RNS test.MethodsMyasthenia Gravis was diagnosed by SFEMG test and acetylcholine receptor antibody titers. During DSST decremental responses were noted. Sensitivity/specificity of DSST were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and best variable in discrimination of myasthenic patients from control subjects with its optimal cutoff-point was selected.ResultsAt a selected cutoff-point, sensitivity and specificity of DSST reached up to 100%. Also DSST response patterns, especially during the resolution of ischemia, showed significant differences in MG patients. There was a delayed recovery in the ischemia–exercise aggravated decremental response after the resolution of ischemia in the patients when compared with rapid recovery in controls.ConclusionsBy using ROC derived cutoff-points, DSST could accurately discriminate MG patients from control subjects. Quantitative results of our study are limited by small series of patients and can vary with larger series. However we think that the difference between the decremental response patterns of patients and controls is a valuable finding.SignificanceDSST can be a sensitive, specific and non-invasive choice in the patients who have high suspicion for MG but normal conventional RNS.     

Literature review of the usefulness of repetitive nerve stimulation and single fiber EMG in the electrodiagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

A retrospective literature review of the electrodiagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert--Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) through July 1998 was performed for the purpose of generating evidence-based practice parameters. There were 545 articles identified, of which 13 articles met at least three of the six criteria set previously by the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM). An additional 21 articles were identified from review articles or the references of these first 13 articles leading to a total of 34 articles. Results of studies utilizing repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) showed that a 10% decrement in amplitude from the first to fourth or fifth intravolley waveform while stimulating at 2--5 HZ is valid for the diagnosis of MG. The degree of increment needed for the diagnosis of LEMS is at least 25% but most accurate when greater than 100%. Abnormal jitter or impulse blocking are the appropriate criteria for diagnosis of neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders when using single fiber electromyography (SFEMG). SFEMG is more sensitive than RNS for the diagnosis of disorders of neuromuscular transmission, but may be less specific and may not be available. Therefore, RNS remains the preferred initial test for MG and LEMS.     

Electrophysiological differences in seropositive and seronegative Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

In order to determine whether there is any difference between voltage-gated calcium-channel antibody (VGCC-Ab)-positive and -negative groups in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), we compared the clinical and electrophysiological features between 13 patients with VGCC-Ab and 6 VGCC-Ab-negative patients. No obvious difference was observed in the various clinical features or findings on single-fiber electromyography between seropositive and seronegative cases. In seropositive cases, the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was lower but the increment on post-exercise facilitation (PEF) and high-rate stimulation (HRS) was significantly higher than in the seronegative group, indicating that the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test in the seropositive group is more typical of LEMS and more severe. A 100% increment as the diagnostic criterion in the routine RNS test was satisfied in all seropositive cases but in only three seronegative cases, whereas a 60% increment as the diagnostic criterion was found in all seronegative cases. The classic triad (low CMAP amplitude, decrement at low rate of stimulation, and increment at PEF or HRS) of RNS is rare, adding to the difficulty in diagnosing LEMS in the seronegative group, and making a 60% increment criterion more critical for the diagnosis of this disorder.