Interaction of L-dopa and GHRH on GH secretion in normal men

To determine how L-dopa stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo. Six normal men were studied on 4 occasions: 1) L-dopa-TRH: 500 mg L-dopa orally followed by 200 micrograms TRH 60 min later; 2) L-dopa-GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH 1-44 iv 30 min after L-dopa followed by 200 micrograms TRH iv; 3) GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH iv at 0 min, 30 min later 200 micrograms TRH iv; 4) TRH test: 200 micrograms TRH iv as a bolus. After L-dopa-TRH GH-levels increased significantly from 0.6 micrograms/l to 25.8 +/- 9.6 (SE) micrograms/l at 60 min. Only a slight TSH and no PRL increase was observed after L-dopa-TRH. After L-dopa-GHRH-TRH the GH-increase was significantly higher (45.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/l) compared to L-dopa-TRH alone. GHRH-TRH increased GH-levels to 52.5 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, which was not significantly different from the GH-levels obtained when L-dopa-GHRH-TRH were given. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL to 6.3 +/- 0.7 microU/ml and 715 +/- 136 microU/ml, respectively, which was significantly higher compared to the TSH responses after L-dopa-TRH. The PRL and TSH increase after TRH only was also higher (TSH-max: 5.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; PRL-max: 899 +/- 154 microU/ml) compared to the TSH and PRL responses after L-dopa-TRH. Our results show that the combination of L-dopa with GHRH leads to the same GH response as GHRH only. However, both responses are significantly higher than the one after L-dopa alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of simultaneous administration of GHRH (1-40) and TRH on GH, PRL and TSH secretion in normal man

The GHRH test represents a new tool in the study of secretion in man. Nine normal fasting males received on separate occasions in random order 1) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0; 2) TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min; 3) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0 plus TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min. Blood samples were drawn for GH, PRL and TSH at -90, -60, -30, 0 min and then every 15 min for 2 h. GHRH significantly increased GH in all subjects. The same GH response was found during GHRH plus TRH test. No effect was found either on PRL and TSH secretion after GHRH administration, or on GH pattern after TRH administration. A significant decrease of TSH, but not of PRL response was observed after GHRH plus TRH administration in comparison to TRH alone. These results underline that the inhibitory effect exerted by TRH on GH secretion during some experimental conditions is not linked to a pituitary interference between GHRH and TRH. The difference in TSH secretion, following GHRH plus TRH in comparison with TRH alone, could be due to a GHRH-induced central inhibitory mechanism, probably GHRH-related.     

Impaired inhibitory effects of somatostatin on growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone stimulation of GH secretion after short term infusion

We examined the effect of prior exposure to somatostatin (SRIH) on its inhibition of GH and TSH responses to GHRH and TRH stimulation to determine whether SRIH desensitization has physiological significance in man. Six men received GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv) and TRH (0.3 microgram/kg, iv) 20 min after starting a saline or SRIH (5.5 ng/kg/min, iv) infusion and again 6 h later. Hormone responses were quantified by measuring the area under the curve, corrected for GH concentration at injection time. Similar results were obtained when GH responses were quantified by measuring the hormone secretory rate using the program Detect. Plasma GH and TSH responses to the two GHRH and TRH injections during saline were similar. However, the effects of prior exposure to SRIH were hormone specific. SRIH blunted GH responses to GHRH at 20 min (1609 +/- 286 micrograms/L.min vs. 451 +/- 224), but did not significantly inhibit the responses 6 h later (1422 +/- 410 micrograms/L.min vs. 1000 +/- 302). In contrast, SRIH inhibition of TSH responses to the two TRH injections was similar (first, 946 +/- 201 micrograms/L.min vs. 700 +/- 148; second, 813 +/- 175 micrograms/L.min vs. 562 +/- 66). We next used these results to study whether the previously reported attenuation of GH responses to repeated GHRH stimulation at 2-h intervals is mediated by SRIH. Eight men received GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv) 380 min after starting a saline or SRIH (5.5 ng/kg/min, iv) infusion or 90 min after starting a primed (5 mg, iv) infusion of propranolol (80 micrograms/min, iv) and again 2 h later. As in the first protocol, GH responses to GHRH were not inhibited when preceded by a 6-h SRIH infusion. However, the 6-h SRIH infusion resulted in a partial restoration of plasma GH responses to the second GHRH injection (saline infusion: first, 1429 +/- 342 micrograms/L.min; second, 254 +/- 75; SRIH infusion: first, 1042 +/- 247 micrograms/L.min; second, 468 +/- 105). beta-Blockade by propranolol resulted in enhanced GH responses to GHRH, but did not prevent the attenuation of GH responses to the second GHRH injection (first, 1937 +/- 366 micrograms/L.min; second, 614 +/- 99). The desensitization to SRIH inhibition of GH responses to GHRH after a 6-h SRIH infusion provides evidence of physiological consequences of SRIH receptor down-regulation. The impaired GH responses to repeated GHRH stimulation are mediated at least in part by enhanced SRIH secretion, which appears independent of a beta-adrenergic mechanism.     

EFFECT OF SUBACUTE CABERGOLINE TREATMENT ON PROLACTIN, THYROID STIMULATING HORMONE AND GROWTH HORMONE RESPONSE TO SIMULTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF THYROTROPHIN-RELEASING HORMONE AND GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE IN HYPERPROLACTINAEMIC WOMEN

It is known that dopaminergic neurotransmission is involved in the control of PRL, TSH and GH secretion. Cabergoline (CAB) is a new ergolinic derivative with a long-acting dopaminergic activity. We evaluated 11 women with pathological hyperprolactinaemia before and during sub-acute CAB treatment (0.8-1.2 mg/p.o.; 8 weeks). Simultaneous administration of TRH (200 micrograms i.v.) and GHRH 1-44 (50 micrograms i.v.) were carried out before and after 4, 8 and 10 week intervals from the beginning of CAB treatment. Basal PRL levels (2453.5 +/- S.E. 444.5 mU/l) were significantly reduced during CAB administration (week 4: 164.5 +/- 66.5 mU/l; week 8: 168.0 +/- 66.5 mU/l; P less than 0.01) and no variations were observed 2 weeks after drug discontinuation (week 10: 210.0 +/- 98.0 mU/l). PRL percentage change after TRH was increased by CAB (P less than 0.05). No variation in basal and TRH-stimulated TSH levels was found during CAB administration. A slight increase in GH basal levels (3.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l) was found after weeks 4 (6.4 +/- 2.0 mU/l) and 10 (5.8 +/- 1.6 mU/l) (P less than 0.05). GH response to GHRH was significantly enhanced (ANOVA: P less than 0.01) during sub-acute CAB treatment. A positive correlation was found between GH secretory area and weeks of CAB therapy (P less than 0.01). Our data show that CAB is very effective in lowering PRL secretion in hyperprolactinaemia, and is able to modify PRL and GH responses after TRH and GHRH. The increasing trend in GH basal and GHRH-stimulated GH levels seems to indicate that CAB can override the central dopaminergic tone which is operative in hyperprolactinaemia.     

Effects of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine administration on basal and growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone secretion in elderly subjects

The basal and GH-releasing hormone-stimulated secretion of GH declines in the elderly. We tested the ability of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine, a drug used in the treatment of stroke and Parkinson's disease, to alter GH secretion in 11 healthy elderly volunteers, aged 69-84. Each subject received an iv infusion of 2 g of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine or normal saline. GHRH and TRH were also administered during cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine infusions. The infusion of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine induced a 4-fold (p less than 0.05) increase in serum GH levels over basal values. A small increase in GH was seen after GHRH administration. However, the addition of GHRH to the cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine infusion resulted in a GH response which was significantly greater than that seen after GHRH alone; the integrated concentration of GH was more than 2-fold greater in the cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine treated group (706.85 +/- 185.1 vs 248.9 +/- 61.4 micrograms.l-1.(120 min)-1; p = 0.01). The PRL and TSH responses to TRH were not significantly affected by cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine infusion, indicating that dopaminergic mechanisms are not involved. These studies demonstrate that cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine can enhance basal and GHRH-stimulated GH release in the elderly, but the mechanism of action of the drug remains unclear.     

The interaction of GHRH with TRH in acromegaly: a controlled study

In a single-blind placebo-controlled study, the effect of an iv bolus injection of 100 micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2 on the response to 200 micrograms TRH was assessed in 10 untreated patients with acromegaly to determine whether GHRH interacts with TRH in acromegaly, as previously described in healthy subjects. The combination of GHRH(1-29)NH2 with TRH resulted in a larger increment of peak and of integrated plasma TSH and PRL levels than after TRH alone. GHRH alone had no effect on TSH secretion and only a modest effect on PRL secretion. These findings suggest that in acromegaly, like in healthy individuals, GHRH potentiates the TSH response to TRH and that the effects of GHRH and TRH on PRL secretion are additive.     

Different prolactin, thyrotropin, and thyroxine responses after prolonged intermittent or continuous infusions of thyrotropin-releasing hormone in rhesus monkeys

Serum PRL, TSH, and T4 secretion during prolonged continuous or intermittent iv infusions of TRH were studied in 14 adult ovariectomized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). For 9 days, TRH was administered intermittently at 0.33 or 3.3 micrograms/min for 6 of every 60 min and continuously at 0.33 micrograms/min. With both modes, the PRL levels and responsiveness to TRH simulation peaked on day 1 and then fell to levels that were still higher than the preinfusion values; levels for the intermittently treated group on days 3-9 were 2- to 4-fold above prestimulation levels and significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than levels for the continuously treated group. Elevated basal levels and PRL responses to TRH pulses were similar during the 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min pulses of the 9-day treatment period. For both TRH modes, TSH levels were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) on day 1 [this increase was higher with continuous infusion (P less than 0.001)] and then fell to preinfusion levels by day 3. Serum T4 also increased during both continuous and intermittent TRH stimulations. However, serum T4 levels were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) after intermittent TRH (both 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min) than after continuous (0.33 micrograms) TRH (8 +/- 1.1 and 10 +/- 1.8 micrograms T4/dl vs. 18 +/- 3.1 micrograms, respectively). These PRL and T4 responses were replicated when the mode of administering 0.33 micrograms/min TRH was reversed after 9 days. An iv bolus of TRH (20 micrograms) after 9 days of continuous or intermittent TRH infusion caused significant release of PRL and TSH, an indication that neither mode of administration resulted in pituitary depletion of releasable hormone. We have concluded that intermittent TRH is more effective in elevating serum PRL, and continuous TRH is more effective in raising TSH and T4 levels. Thus, the manner of TRH secretion by the hypothalamus may determine its relative physiological importance in the stimulation of lactotropes and thyrotropes.     

Short term continuous intravenous infusion of growth hormone (GH) inhibits GH-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion: a time-dependent effect

We previously reported that GH secretion evoked by GHRH is inhibited after 5 days of treatment with im GH. This impaired pituitary response was associated with a significant increase in the serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). To dissociate the possible effects of circulating IGF-I from other effects of GH on the pituitary response to GHRH, we carried out the following study in eight normal men. A bolus injection of GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv) was administered 2 h after the start of a 4-h continuous iv infusion of GH (180-micrograms bolus dose, then 3 micrograms/min in 150 mmol/L NaCl) or placebo (150 mmol/L NaCl). In addition, a similar injection of GHRH was given 4 h after the start of a 6-h continuous iv GH infusion (180-micrograms bolus dose, then 3 micrograms/min). During the GH infusions, plasma GH levels reached steady state concentrations in the 9-13 micrograms/L range. The mean GHRH-induced GH response was not significantly blunted during the 4-h infusions of GH [724 +/- 163 (+/- SE) vs. 1184 +/- 373 micrograms.min/L during placebo; P = 0.29], but was significantly inhibited during the 6-h GH infusions (226 +/- 105 micrograms.min/L; P = 0.04 vs. control). Serum IGF-I or plasma glucose did not change significantly throughout the GH infusions. During the 6-h GH infusions, plasma FFA increased to levels significantly above basal values during the last 3 h of the 6-h infusion. These results indicate that short term GH infusion inhibits the plasma GH response to GHRH in a time-dependent manner. The inhibition is not due to changes in circulating IGF-I and glucose concentrations. Fluctuations in hypothalamic somatostatin secretion, changes in lipid or other GH-dependent metabolites, paracrine effects of IGF-I, or a direct effect of GH itself may cause the impaired pituitary responsiveness during short term iv GH infusion.     

Discordance between growth hormone (GH) responses after GH-releasing hormone and insulin hypoglycemia in myotonic dystrophy

Plasma GH responses to human GHRH, arginine, L-dopa, and insulin-induced hypoglycemia were determined in seven myotonic dystrophy (MD) patients. An iv bolus injection of GHRH-(1-44)-NH2 (1 microgram/kg BW) only slightly increased plasma GH concentrations in MD patients. The mean peak plasma GH level after GHRH injection [4.2 +/- 0.8 (+/- SE) micrograms/L] was significantly lower than that in 10 age-matched normal subjects (26.7 +/- 4.3 micrograms/L) or that in 6 patients with progressive muscular dystrophy (22.8 +/- 6.6 micrograms/L) whose nutritional status was similar to that of the MD patients. Even with a larger dose of GHRH (3 micrograms/kg BW), the plasma GH rises were minimal in the MD patients (mean peak, 5.9 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L). The plasma GH responses to a 30-min iv infusion of arginine (0.5 g/kg BW) and oral ingestion of L-dopa (0.5 g) were attenuated to a similar extent, whereas insulin-induced hypoglycemia caused a significant increase in plasma GH in all seven MD patients [mean peak, 17.4 +/- 4.1 (+/- SE) microgram/L]. The plasma TSH responses to TRH and plasma insulin-like growth factor I levels were similar in the MD patients and normal subjects. These findings suggest that 1) the impaired GH release after GHRH, arginine, and L-dopa administration in MD patients is not due to somatotroph deficiency, since the GH response to hypoglycemia is well preserved; and 2) insulin-induced hypoglycemia may stimulate GH release at least in part via inhibition of somatostatin release.     

Down-regulation of prolactin secretion in men during continuous thyrotropin-releasing hormone infusion: evidence for induction of pituitary desensitization by continuous TRH administration

TRH was administered as a 5-h constant rate iv infusion (5 micrograms/min) to seven healthy adult men. Serum samples were collected at regular intervals for measurement of PRL, TSH, and T3. Serum levels of PRL during TRH infusion increased sharply to maximum level by 40 min, and then, despite continued TRH stimulation, PRL levels declined gradually to a plateau value after 100 min. No further rise in serum PRL was observed when a bolus of 200 micrograms TRH was administered to three subjects after 240 min of infusion. Conversely, an iv bolus of sulpiride (25 mg), a dopaminergic antagonist, given to four subjects after 240 min, brought about a marked increase in serum PRL values above the plateau level. These results are consistent with the interpretation that down-regulation in PRL secretion which follows the initial peak of response most likely represents pituitary desensitization to TRH. During the infusion serum TSH increases in two phases. A first phase of secretion was observed by 40 min followed by a plateau, with a second phase of increase occurring between 80-180 min.     

Effects of repetitive administration of thyrotropin-releasing hormone at short intervals in acromegaly

We investigated the pattern of GH secretion in response to repetitive TRH administration in patients with active acromegaly and in normal subjects. Nine acromegalic patients and 10 normal subjects received three doses of 200 micrograms of TRH iv at 90-min intervals. There was a marked serum GH rise in acromegalic patients after each TRH dose (net incremental area under the curve [nAUC]: first dose = 4448 +/- 1635 micrograms.min.l-1; second dose = 3647 +/- 1645 micrograms.min.l-1; third dose = 4497 +/- 2416 micrograms.min.l-1; NS), though individual GH responses were very variable. In normal subjects TRH did not elicit GH secretion even after repeated stimulation. Each TRH administration stimulated PRL release in acromegalic patients, though the nAUC of PRL was significantly higher after the first (1260 +/- 249 micrograms.min.l-1) than after the second and the third TRH administration (478 +/- 195 and 615 +/- 117 micrograms.min.l-1, respectively; P less than 0.01). In normal subjects too, PRL secretion was lower after repeated stimulation (first dose = 1712 +/- 438 micrograms.min.l-1; second dose = 797 +/- 177 micrograms.min.l-1; third dose = 903 +/- 229 micrograms.min.l-1 P less than 0.01), though different kinetics of PRL secretion were evident, when compared with acromegalic patients. TSH secretion, assessed in only 4 patients, was stimulated after each TRH dose, though a minimal but significant reduction of nAUC of TSH after repeated TRH challenge occurred. Both T3 and T4 increased steadily in the 4 patients. The same pattern of TSH, T3, and T4 secretion occurred in normal subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Differential effects of somatostatin (SRIH) and a SRIH analog, SMS 201-995, on the secretion of growth hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone in man

We compared the ability of SRIH and SRIH analog, SMS 201-995 (SMS), to inhibit stimulated GH and TSH secretion in men who received 120-min iv infusions of saline, SRIH (5, 50, and 500 micrograms/h), and SMS (3, 30, and 300 ng/kg.h) together with a bolus iv injection of GHRH (1 microgram/kg) and TRH (500 micrograms). Integrated GH secretion during the 60 min after GHRH plus TRH injection was decreased compared to that after saline by (mean +/- SE) 32 +/- 14% (P = 0.059), 78 +/- 5% (P less than 0.001), and 88 +/- 3% (P less than 0.001) during the 5, 50, and 500 micrograms/h SRIH infusions, and by 13 +/- 7% (P = NS), 50 +/- 15% (P less than 0.05), and 80 +/- 6% (P less than 0.001) during the 3, 30, and 300 ng/kg.h SMS infusions. In contrast, integrated TSH secretion was unaltered during the 5 micrograms/h SRIH and 3 ng/kg.h SMS infusions; it decreased by only 43 +/- 5% (P less than 0.001) and 66 +/- 4% (P less than 0.001) during the 50 and 500 micrograms/h SRIH infusions and by 33 +/- 8% (P less than 0.05) and 50 +/- 3% (P less than 0.001) during the 30 and 300 ng/kg.h SMS infusions. Analysis of the dose-response curves indicated approximately 10- and 5-fold greater potencies of SRIH and SMS, respectively, in inhibiting GH as compared to TSH secretion. These results quantify the effect of SRIH as an inhibitor of GH secretion and suggest that if SRIH has a physiological role in the inhibition of TSH secretion in man, it is limited to conditions associated with marked suppression of GH.     

Initial characterization of the GH-IGF axis and nutritional status of the Ati Negritos of the Philippines

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of severe head injury on both basal pituitary hormone secretion and the response to exogenous synthetic hypothalamic releasing factors (TRH and GHRH) in order to evaluate sequential changes in the central control of hypophyseal secretion in the days following head injury. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study PATIENTS: 21 comatose male patients with head injuries, each intubated and ventilated, intensively monitored and having no previous endocrine problems. MEASUREMENTS: AND RESULTS The GH and PRL responses to TRH (200 microg iv), and the GH and PRL responses to GHRH (50 microg iv) were evaluated, respectively, on the days 1 and 16 and on days 2, 7and 15 after admission. Daily blood samples were also collected for GH, PRL, TSH, T3 and T4 evaluation. In the basal samples taken on days 2, 7 and 15, IGF-I and cortisol were also determined. Nitrogen balance was assessed daily. On the day 1, TRH increased GH levels from 9.8 +/- 2.2 to 22.4 +/- 6.5 mU/l but failed to induce GH release on day 16. The PRL response to TRH was normal. The GH peak response to GHRH was normal on the day 2 (35.7 +/- 13.9 mU/l), but was increased on days 7 and 15 (68.3 +/- 10.7 mU/l on day 7; 73.8 +/- 9.2 mU/l on day 15, P < 0.01 vs. day 2). We found a significant PRL response to GHRH during the whole period of observation. In the daily evaluation, nitrogen balance was negative in all patients from the day 1 to 5. On average, all patients reached a positive nitrogen balance on the day 8. Compared to the day 2, a statistical increase in IGF-I concentration was observed on days 7 and 15. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of pituitary dynamics in the acute phase of a severe injury demonstrates an alteration of GH and PRL secretion, which correlate with the aminergic and/or peptidergic derangements. Taken together, our data suggest augmented tone of both GHRH and somatostatin in the very acute phase, while an imbalance of releasing factors is hypothesized in the following days. The metabolic consequences of this neuroendocrine pattern could be advantageous in the rapid recovery from the cascade of events produced by the trauma, as documented by the increase in IGF-1 levels and the positive nitrogen balance.     

Increased growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing hormone induced by erythropoietin in uraemic patients

This study was designed to assess the response of growth hormone (GH) to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) and the possible interaction of acutely administered recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) on GH response to GHRH in a group of uraemic patients. Eight patients on maintenance haemodialysis, not previously treated with rhEPO, and six healthy controls were tested with GHRH (100 micrograms i.v. in bolus), and with GHRH (100 micrograms i.v. in bolus) plus rhEPO (40 U/kg in constant infusion for 30 min) on different days. GHRH injection provoked a GH release in five out of eight uraemic patients; the overall mean response did not differ significantly from the GH response obtained in controls (P = 0.30). Erythropoietin infusion significantly increased GH release after GHRH (P less than 0.01 at 15, 30, 45, 60 min after GHRH injection) in uraemic patients; in controls, on the contrary, stimulation with GHRH plus rhEPO did not induce a greater increase of GH release compared with that observed after GHRH alone (mean GH peak 37.66 +/- 7.68 mU/l after GHRH; and 38.0 +/- 9.18 mU/l after GHRH plus rhEPO; P greater than 0.5). In this study acutely administered rhEPO significantly potentiated the GH response to GHRH in uraemic patients whereas the same effect was not demonstrable in subjects with normal renal function.     

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide stimulates GH release in normal men and acts synergistically with GH-releasing hormone

The acute GH release stimulated by the synthetic hexapeptide, His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 [GH releasing peptide (GHRP)], was determined in 18 normal men and compared with the effects of GH-releasing hormone, GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. Specificity of effect was assessed by measurement of serum PRL, LH, TSH, and cortisol. GHRP was administered at doses of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 microgram/kg by iv bolus. GHRH at a dose of 1.0 microgram/kg was administered alone and together with various does of GHRP. No adverse clinical effects of laboratory abnormalities were observed in response to GHRP. A side-effect of mild facial flushing of 1- to 3-min duration occurred in 16 of the 18 subjects who received GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. Mean (+/- SEM) peak serum GH levels after injection of placebo and 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 microgram/kg GHRP were 1.2 +/- 0.3, 7.6 +/- 2.5, 16.5 +/- 4.1, and 68.7 +/- 15.5 micrograms/L, respectively. The submaximal dosages of 0.1 and 0.3 microgram/kg GHRP plus 1 microgram/kg GHRH stimulated GH release synergistically. Serum PRL and cortisol levels rose about 2-fold above basal levels only at the 1 microgram/kg dose of GHRP, and there were no changes in serum LH and TSH over the first hour after administration of the peptide(s). GHRP is a potent secretagogue of GH in normal men. Since GHRP and GHRH together stimulate GH release synergistically, these results suggest that GHRP and GHRH act independently. This supports our hypothesis that the GH-releasing activity of GHRP reflects a new physiological system in need of further characterization in animals and man.     

Galanin abolishes the inhibitory effect of cholinergic blockade on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced secretion of growth hormone in man

In five healthy normal male volunteers, pretreatment with the cholinergic muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine (30 mg i.v.) almost abolished the growth hormone (GH) response to a maximal dose (120 micrograms i.v.) of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (GH response at 40 min 5.6 + 1.3 mU/l with GHRH and pirenzepine vs 40.8 +/- 5.3 mU/l with GHRH alone, P less than 0.02). Concomitant i.v. infusion of galanin (40 pmol/kg/min) with pirenzepine not only restored but significantly potentiated the GH response to GHRH (GH at 40 min 72.2 +/- 10.5 mU/l, P less than 0.001 vs GHRH and pirenzepine, P less than 0.02 vs GHRH alone). Previous studies have proposed that cholinergic pathways control GH release via somatostatin and this study suggests that galanin may act by modulating hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone either directly or, possibly, by facilitating cholinergic neurotransmission.     

Growth hormone-releasing hormone infusion in patients with active acromegaly

To determine GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in patients with active acromegaly, nine patients received a 50-microgram GHRH-(1-44) bolus dose followed by a 2-h infusion with 100 micrograms GHRH/h, after which a second 50-microgram GHRH bolus dose was given. Serum GH, PRL, and immunoreactive GHRH levels were measured from 2 h before to 1 h after the end of the infusion and compared with hormone levels in six normal subjects subjected to the same protocol. In addition, seven of the nine acromegalic patients received 100 micrograms GHRH as an iv bolus dose, followed by a 2-h saline infusion on a different day. After the 100-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, the mean GH level increased from 55.9 +/- 18.0 (+/- SE) to 148.5 +/- 40.0 ng/ml within 15 min. Thereafter, GH levels decreased and were significantly lower at 90 and 120 min compared to the peak level 15 min after GHRH injection. After the 50-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, all acromegalic patients except two also had a clear-cut rise of GH levels, with the mean GH level increasing from 37.5 +/- 13.2 to 108.4 +/- 55.0 ng/ml at 60 min. Thereafter, elevated GH levels were sustained in the acromegalic patients throughout the GHRH infusion. In contrast, normal subjects had a significant decrease in the initially elevated GH levels, despite continuous GHRH infusion. There were no significant differences between PRL secretion and immunoreactive GHRH levels in either group. These findings suggest that patients with active acromegaly not only have elevated basal GH levels, but also have a greater ready releasable GH pool and/or accelerated GH turnover compared to those of normal subjects, which cannot be exhausted by a 2-h GHRH infusion.     

The relationship between TSH response to TRH and GH response to dopaminergic agents in patients with acromegaly]

The role of dopaminergic agents (DA) in the regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion was investigated in patients with untreated acromegaly. TRH (0.5 mg iv), bromocriptine (Br) (2.5 mg orally) or L-Dopa (500 mg orally) loading tests were performed, and serum levels of TSH, GH and prolactin (PRL) were measured. Patients were defined as responders to TRH when peak TSH level after TRH test was higher than 5 microU/ml. Br or L-Dopa was considered to be effective when serum GH or PRL levels were suppressed more than 50% of the basal value. The patients were classified into large adenoma group with suprasellar extension or cisternal herniation (L group, n = 7) and intrasellar small adenoma group (S group, n = 11) which was further divided into TRH responder (Sr group, n = 4) and TRH non-responder with suppressed TSH (Ss group, n = 7). Br was effective in 7 or 100% of 7 patients in the Ss group but only in one or 25% of 4 patients in the Sr group. Br was also effective in 5 or 71% of 7 patients in the L group, although most of them were responders to TRH. Percent inhibition of serum GH levels by Br was significantly higher in the Ss group (82.3 +/- 12.3%, p less than 0.001) and in the L group (64.7 +/- 20.5%, p less than 0.05) compared with that in the Sr group (29.3 +/- 21.6%). Suppression of serum GH level by L-Dopa was also observed in the Ss group. In contrast to the difference in the response of GH, serum PRL level was equally suppressed by Br or L-Dopa in each group. Suppression of TSH by administration of exogenous T4 had no effect on the GH suppression effect of Br in the Sr group. Considering the dual effects of DA to enhance growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion in the hypothalamus and to suppress GH secretion in the pituitary gland, these findings suggest that the paradoxical effect of DA to suppress serum GH level is observed when the hypothalamo-pituitary axis is disturbed mechanically by large adenoma in the L group or functionally in the Ss group probably due to enhanced secretion of somatostatin which suppresses TSH secretion and impairs the effect of GHRH.     

The effects of endogenous opioids and cortisol on thyrotropin and prolactin secretion in patients with Addison's disease.

This study assessed the controversial role of endogenous opioids and cortisol in the regulation of TSH and PRL secretion in humans. Seven euthyroid male patients with Addison's disease were studied four times, with an interval of 1-3 months, as follows: 1) during normocortisolism [graduated infusion of hydrocortisone, 0.4 mg/kg, over 19.5 h]; 2) normocortisolism and coadministration of naloxone, at 25 microg/kg x h during the last 6.5 h; 3) hypocortisolism (24 h withdrawal of hydrocortisone, followed by 19.5 h saline infusion); and 4) hypocortisolism plus naloxone administration. The TSH and PRL levels were measured every 15 min, from 0800-1530 h. A TRH test was performed at 1300 h and 1400 h (10 microg and 200 microg of TRH, respectively). The mean TSH level increased significantly during hypocortisolism, compared with normocortisolism (1.78 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.84 +/- 0.02 mU/L; P < 0.001). The administration of naloxone suppressed the TSH levels during hypo- and normocortisolism (1.78 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.50 +/- 0.03 and 0.84 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.61 +/- 0.02 mU/L, respectively; P < 0.001). During hypocortisolism, the TSH responses to small and high doses of TRH were significantly higher than during normocortisolism (P < 0.02). Naloxone had no effect on the TSH responses to TRH, neither during hypo- nor during normocortisolism. The mean PRL level increased significantly during hypocortisolism, compared with normocortisolism (5.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.2 microg/L; P < 0.001), and naloxone induced an increase in PRL levels both during hypo- and normocortisolism (7.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.5 microg/L, respectively; P < 0.01). The PRL responses to TRH were similar during hypo- and normocortisolism and without any change during opioid receptor blockade. In conclusion, cortisol suppressed basal TSH and PRL secretion and reduced the sensitivity of the thyrotrophs to TRH, without affecting the PRL response to TRH. Our results suggest that endogenous opioids act at the hypothalamic level to stimulate TSH secretion and to suppress the PRL secretion, but these results argue against an essential role of endogenous opioids in the physiological regulation of TSH and PRL secretion in humans.     

A possible direct precursor of thyrotropin-releasing hormone, pGlu-His-Pro-Gly, stimulates prolactin secretion in anorexia nervosa

TRH is produced from its possible direct precursor, pGlu-His-Pro-Gly (TRH-Gly), by alpha-amidating enzyme. The quantitative response of TRH-Gly-stimulated PRL, TSH, and GH was evaluated in nine patients with anorexia nervosa, six age-matched normal women, eight patients with uremia, five patients with acromegaly, and two patients with prolactinoma. Intravenous injection (500 micrograms) of TRH-Gly caused a 2.6-fold increase in PRL secretion in patients with anorexia nervosa (basal level, 10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 25.9 +/- 2.5 micrograms/L 15 min after injection; P less than 0.01). In contrast, no significant change was observed in TRH-Gly-stimulated PRL secretion in normal women (basal level, 13.5 +/- 2.3 vs. 15.3 +/- 2.5 micrograms/L 15 min after injection; P greater than 0.05). TRH-Gly did not alter PRL levels in patients with uremia, acromegaly, or prolactinoma. Secretion of TSH, but not GH, was slightly increased by TRH-Gly injection in patients with anorexia nervosa (basal level, 1.41 +/- 0.13 vs. 2.86 +/- 0.22 min/L 30 min after injection; P less than 0.01), whereas no significant secretory response was observed in normal women. These data provide evidence that PRL secretion in anorectic patients is quantitatively different from that in normal persons.