Reported paediatric adverse drug reactions in the UK 2000-2009

AIMS

The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) runs a national spontaneous reporting system (Yellow Card Scheme) to collect ‘suspected’ adverse drug reaction (ADR) data. MHRA advice is to report all suspected ADRs in paediatric (<17 years) patients.

METHODS

Data on all ADRs reported to the MHRA in patients <17 years from the years 2000–9 were supplied in two datasets, inclusive and exclusive of vaccines.

RESULTS

Of 222 755 ADR reports received by the MHRA from 2000–9, 31 726 (14.2%) were in children <17 years. The number of reports in 2000 was greater than in subsequent years (12 035) due to a national vaccination programme (Meningococcal Serogroup C conjugate vaccine). The median number of ADR reports per annum (2001–2009) for children was 2146 (95% CI 1801, 2575). Vaccines were included in 22 102 (66.5%) paediatric ADR reports, with Meningococcal Serogroup C conjugate vaccine reported most frequently (12 106 reports) and headache the commonest symptom (3163). Excluding vaccines, methylphenidate (653 reports) and atomoxetine (491) were the most commonly reported medications, and the most commonly reported symptom was vomiting (374). Reporting by nurses increased from 396 in 2001 to 1295 in 2009 (41.8% of all reports); reporting by doctors stayed constant. Reports from patients, parents or carers more than doubled but remained infrequent (1.5% in 2005, 4.0% in 2009).

CONCLUSIONS

Although under-reporting is probably common, the Yellow Card Scheme in the UK receives more than 2000 reports per year on patients <17 years. Nurses now report more suspected ADRs in children than any other healthcare professional.     

Diclofenac readily penetrates the cerebrospinal fluid in children

AIMS

The primary aim was to study the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of intravenous diclofenac in children. The secondary aim was to evaluate the plasma diclofenac concentration at the onset of wound pain after inguinal surgery in children.

METHODS

A total of 31 children (24 boys) aged 3 months to 12 years received a single intravenous injection of diclofenac 1 mg kg⁻¹. Paired CSF and blood samples were obtained 5 min to 22 h (median 69 min) later. In children having inguinal surgery a second blood sample was obtained at the time that the children felt wound pain for the first time after surgery. Diclofenac concentrations in CSF, plasma and protein free plasma were measured by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection.

RESULTS

In the 28 CSF samples obtained at 5 min to 3 h 43 min after injection, diclofenac concentrations ranged between 0.5 and 4.7 μg l⁻¹. At 5.5 h the CSF concentration was 0.1 μg l⁻¹, and no diclofenac was detected in the two CSF samples obtained at 22 h. The median of plasma diclofenac concentration at the time when pain returned after inguinal surgery was 104 μg l⁻¹ (range 70–272 μg l⁻¹). No serious or unexpected adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Diclofenac penetrates the CSF rapidly, and a sufficient concentration to inhibit cyclooxygenase enzymes is sustained for up to 4 h.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• Diclofenac, a nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug,, exerts analgesic action both in the peripheral tissues and in the central nervous system by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzymes COX-1/2, but central nervous system penetration of diclofenac has not been evaluated in humans.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• Diclofenac penetrates the cerebrospinal fluid rapidly, and after a single intravenous dose of 1 mg kg⁻¹, sufficient concentrations to inhibit COX-1/2 are sustained for up to 4 h.

     

Influence of attitudes on pharmacists' intention to report serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration

AIM

To investigate the influence of pharmacists'' attitudes on intention to report serious adverse drug events (ADEs) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used a mail survey to collect data from hospital and community pharmacists practicing in Texas, United States. Three and 16 items were used to measure intention and attitudes, respectively, using a seven-point bipolar scale. Pharmacists'' demographic and practice characteristics, and past reporting were also measured.

RESULTS

The response rate was 26.4% (n = 377/1500 pharmacists). Most pharmacists intended (n = 297, 78.8%) to report serious ADEs that they will encounter to the FDA through MedWatch. Overall, pharmacists held favourable attitudes towards reporting serious ADEs (mean = 24.5, SD = 6.7, possible range 1–49, neutral = 16). Pharmacists intending to report serious ADEs had more favourable attitudes than those who did not (P < 0.001). About 90% of the pharmacists believed that reporting serious ADEs would improve patient safety. However, 72.6% indicated that reporting serious ADEs was time consuming and over half (55.5%) of the respondents believed that reporting serious ADEs disrupted the normal workflow. Non-intenders held stronger beliefs that ADE reporting would disrupt the normal workflow and was time consuming compared with intenders. Years of experience, number of hours worked and practice setting were associated with pharmacists'' attitudes towards reporting (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most pharmacists held moderately favourable attitudes and high intentions toward reporting serious ADEs to the FDA. This study''s findings contribute to an increased understanding of individual factors that influence pharmacists'' attitude and intention towards reporting serious ADEs to the FDA.     

Use of milrinone in critically ill children

Background

Optimal dose adjustment of milrinone in critically ill children is challenging because of conflicting information about the association between dose and outcomes in this age group.

Objectives

To describe the use of milrinone in critically ill children and to explore associations between milrinone dosing and clinical outcomes, specifically effectiveness and adverse events.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was performed in a consecutive sample of children admitted to a university-affiliated critical care unit (January to June 2004). The relations between milrinone dosing and its effectiveness (based on prevention of low cardiac output syndrome, defined as a difference in oxygen saturation between arterial and mixed venous blood of at least 30% or an increase in serum lactate > 2 mmol/L) and its adverse effects (thrombocytopenia, arrhythmia) were evaluated by logistic regression.

Results

A total of 197 children from 213 admissions (ranging in age from newborn to 18 years) were included in the study. Milrinone was initiated with a median loading dose of 99.2 μg/kg (range 22.1–162.2 μg/kg). The initial loading dose was higher if given in the operating room rather than the Critical Care Unit (median 99.7 versus 51.0 μg/kg; p < 0.001). Subsequent loading doses, for patients who received them, were lower (median 49 μg/kg). Milrinone was infused at a median rate of 0.64 μg/kg per minute (range 0.13–2.08 μg/kg per minute) for a median of 43.1 h. There was no relation between serum creatinine level and the maintenance dose of milrinone (r ² ≤ 0.0335). Low cardiac output syndrome was relatively frequent (166 [77.9%] of the 213 admissions). There was a trend for occurrence of this syndrome in patients with greater average milrinone dose rate (odds ratio [OR] 8.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–69.15, p = 0.053) and with longer duration of milrinone therapy (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02, p < 0.05). Adverse events were relatively frequent (thrombocytopenia for 27 admissions [12.7%], arrhythmia for 82 admissions [38.5%]) but were not significantly associated with milrinone dosing.

Conclusions

A retrospective evaluation of milrinone use in critically ill children revealed variable utilization and frequent occurrence of both low cardiac output syndrome and adverse events. Further prospective research is needed to understand the impact of individual pharmacokinetic differences on pharmacodynamic responses, to guide optimal dose adjustment, improve outcomes, and minimize toxic effects.     

Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study

Aims

To determine the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions (FADRs) in a Swedish population.

Methods

Every seventh randomly selected deceased in three counties in South-east Sweden during 1 January 2001–31 December 2001 was identified in the Cause of Death Register. Relevant case records (hospitals and/or primary care centres and medicolegal files) were reviewed to identify suspected drug-related fatalities.

Results

Of 1574 deceased study subjects, 49 (3.1%; 95% CI 2.2%, 4.0%) were suspected to have died from FADRs. The most common suspected FADRs were gastrointestinal haemorrhages (n = 18; 37%), central nervous system haemorrhages (n = 14; 29%), cardiovascular disorders (n = 5; 10%), other haemorrhages (n = 4; 8%) and renal dysfunction (n = 3; 6%). The drugs most commonly implicated in FADRs were antithrombotic drugs (n = 31; 63%), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (n = 9; 18%), antidepressants (n = 7; 14%) and cardiovascular drugs (n = 4; 8%). Of all the 639 fatalities in hospital 41 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.5%, 8.3%) were suspected to be due to FADRs.

Conclusions

The medical burden of FADRs is significant. Haemorrhages were seen in a majority of the FADRs; antithrombotic agents or NSAIDs were implicated in most of these events. These results suggest that preventive measures should be taken to reduce the number of deaths caused by drugs.

What is already known about this subject

• Although drugs generally are safe and effective therapies for numerous diseases, adverse drug reactions do occur and may even be fatal.
• The incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients has been estimated to be approximately 5%.
• In previous studies the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients has been reported, but the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in the general population is largely unknown.

What this study adds

• Fatal adverse drug reactions account for approximately 3% of all deaths in the general population.
• Haemorrhages amount to almost two-thirds of the fatal adverse drug reactions and antithrombotic agents are implicated in more than half of the suspected fatal adverse drug reactions.
• Fatal adverse drug reactions are estimated to be the seventh most common cause of death in Sweden.

     

Altered xanthine oxidase and N-acetyltransferase activity in obese children

AIMS

It is well established that oxidative and conjugative enzyme activity differs between obese and healthy-weight adults. However, the effect of obesity on drug metabolism in children has not been studied extensively. This study examined whether obese and healthy-weight children vary with respect to oxidative enzyme activity of CYP1A2, xanthine oxidase (XO) and conjugative enzyme activity of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2).

METHODS

In vivo CYP1A2, XO and NAT2 activity was assessed in obese (n = 9) and lean (n = 16) children between the ages of 6–10 years using caffeine (118.3 ml Coca Cola®) as probe. Urine samples were collected in 2-h increments over 8 h. Caffeine and metabolites were measured using LC/MS, and urinary metabolic ratios were determined based on reported methods.

RESULTS

Sixteen healthy-weight and nine obese children were evaluated. XO activity was elevated in paediatric obese volunteers compared with non-obese paediatric volunteers (XO metabolic ratio of 0.7 ± 0.06 vs. 0.6 ± 0.06, respectively, 95% CI 0.046, 0.154, P < 0.001). NAT2 activity was fivefold higher in the obese (1 ± 0.4) as compared with non-obese children (0.2 ± 0.1), 95% CI 0.26, 1.34, P < 0.05. However, no difference was observed in CYP1A2 activity between the groups (95% CI −2.72, 0.12, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that obese children have elevated XO and NAT2 enzyme activity when compared with healthy-weight controls. Further studies are needed to determine how this may impact the efficacy of therapeutic agents that may undergo metabolism by these enzymes.     

Quality of life in children with adverse drug reactions: a narrative and systematic review

Aims

Adverse drug reactions are a common problem affecting adults and children. The economic impact of the adverse drug reactions has been widely evaluated; however, studies of the impact on the quality of life of children with adverse drug reactions are scarce. The aim was to evaluate studies assessing the health-related quality of life of children with adverse drug reactions.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review that included the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Health Technology Assessment Databases).

Results

Nine studies were included. Four of the studies were conducted in children with epilepsy; the rest of them involved children with chronic viral hepatitis, Crohn’s disease, paediatric cancer and multiple adverse drug reactions compared with healthy children. Based on their findings, authors of all studies concluded that adverse drug reactions had a negative impact on the quality of life of children. No meta-analysis was conducted given the heterogeneous nature of the studies.

Conclusions

To date, there is no specific instrument that measures quality of life of children with adverse drug reactions, and the information available is poor and variable. In general, adverse drug reactions have a negative impact on the quality of life of affected children. For those interested in this area, more work needs to be done to improve tools that help to evaluate efficiently the health-related quality of life of children with adverse drug reactions and chronic diseases.     

Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India

Aims

To ascertain the current burden of ADRs at a Government hospital in Ooty and to assess the severity of reported ADRs and the additional financial burden associated with ADRs.

Methods

A prospective, spontaneous reporting study was conducted over a period of 9 months of inpatient admissions to the medical wards, co-ordinated by clinical pharmacists. The WHO definition of an ADR was adopted. The Naranjo algorithm scale was used for causality assessment. Confirmed ADRs were classified according to the Wills & Brown [7] method and assessed for severity and patient outcomes. The average cost incurred in treating the ADRs was calculated.

Results

Of the total of 187 adverse drug events (ADEs) reported, 164 reports from 121 patients were confirmed as ADRs, giving an overall incidence of 9.8%. This included 58 (3.4%) ADR related admissions and 63 (3.7%) ADRs occurring during the hospital stay. About two thirds of the reactions (102, 62.2%) were classified as probable. The majority of the reactions (88, 53.7%) were mild. Most patients (119, 72.6%) recovered from the incidence. The majority of the reactions were of type H (100, 61%) which indicates that they were not predictable and not potentially preventable. An average cost of 481 rupees (£6) was spent on each patient to manage ADRs.

Conclusions

The incidence and severity of ADRs documented in our study are lower than those reported in comparable populations in Western studies but more than those reported in India.

What is already known about this subject

• The benefits of adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring are well-known.
• Poor awareness and nonavailability of a central co-ordinating body resulted in lack of ADR monitoring in India.
• The National Pharmacovigilance Programme was recently initiated, encouraging ADR monitoring in selected centres, including our centre.

What this study adds

• This is the first study of its kind at GHQH, Ootacamund that has provided insight into the burden of ADRs here.
• The incidence and severity of ADRs documented in our study is lower than those reported in comparable populations in Western studies but more than those reported in India.

     

Trends of reporting of 'serious'vs. 'non-serious' adverse drug reactions over time: a study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database

AIM

To investigate trends in spontaneous reporting to the French Pharmacovigilance system of ‘serious’ (SADRs) and ‘non-serious’ (NSADRs) adverse drug reactions over time.

METHODS

Annual SADR : NSADR ratios were calculated for each drug and their evolution tested with linear trend tests.

RESULTS

Among the 39 new active substances commercialized in France in 2000, 16 had sufficient data to perform linear trend tests. An increasing linear relation was found for five widely prescribed drugs, a non-significant increasing trend for eight others, i.e. drugs mostly used in hospitals.

CONCLUSION

ADR reports mainly concern NSADRs during first years of marketing. Reports of SADRs are proportionally more frequent later.     

Prevalence of potentially hazardous drug interactions amongst Australian veterans

BACKGROUND

Up to 21% of adverse drug event-related hospital admissions are due to drug interactions. Clinical significance of drug interactions varies, and drug interactions defined ‘potentially hazardous’ are more likely to contribute to morbidity and mortality.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of potentially hazardous drug interactions in an elderly Australian veteran population.

METHODS

This study assessed the prevalence of potentially hazardous drug interactions, where hazardous was defined in three or more international drug interaction references, using Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme pharmacy claims data. Analysis was limited to patients who received regular concurrent dispensings of potentially hazardous interacting medicines.

RESULTS

Of the 287 074 subjects included in the study, 1.5% were dispensed potentially hazardous interacting drug pairs. For patients dispensed cyclosporin, concomitant use of a statin was common (47%); as was statin use with those dispensed itraconazole (31%). Of those dispensed methotrexate, 24% also received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; of those on lithium, 18% also received an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin 2 receptor blocker; of those on warfarin, 7.2% and 5.9% were co-dispensed an non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antiplatelets respectively; for those on verapamil, 5.3% were co-dispensed a beta-blocker, while for those on amiodarone 6.2% were co-dispensed digoxin.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall prevalence of potentially serious drug interactions appears to be low in the Australian veteran population. However, patients taking cyclosporine, itraconazole, methotrexate, lithium, warfarin, verapamil and amiodarone appear to be most at risk and their medicine use should be regularly reviewed to prevent potentially hazardous drug interactions.     

Interpreting adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports as hospital patient safety incidents

AIM

In the UK, the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) includes adverse drug reactions as a reporting category, while the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme also collects data regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this study, we aimed to assess ADRs using NPSA criteria and discuss the resulting implications.

METHODS

ADRs identified in a 6-month prospective study of 3695 inpatient episodes were assessed according to their impact on the patient and on the organization, using tools developed by the NPSA.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-three (100%) ADRs were assessed. In terms of impact on the patient, 537 (73.3%) were categorized as ‘low’ (minor treatment), 181 (24.7%) as ‘moderate’ (moderate increase in treatment, no permanent harm), 14 (1.91%) as ‘severe’ (permanent harm) and 1 (0.14%) was categorized as ‘catastrophic’ (direct cause of death). In terms of impact on the organization, none was categorized as ‘no harm/ no risk’, 508 (69.3%) as ‘insignificant’, 188 (25.6%) as ‘minor’, 25 (3.4%) as ‘moderate’, 12 (1.6%) as ‘major’ and none was classed as ‘catastrophic’. Less than 2% of ADRs would be eligible for detailed analysis according to the NPSA guidance. The ADRs that cause incidents of greater significance relate to bleeding, renal impairment and Clostridium difficile infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification of ADRs according to NPSA guidance offers limited additional value over and above that offered by the Yellow Card System. A consistent message needs to be sent to prospective reporters of ADRs; the availability of more than one system is likely to confuse reporters and does not aid patient safety.     

The role of electronic healthcare record databases in paediatric drug safety surveillance: a retrospective cohort study

Aim

Electronic healthcare record (EHR)-based surveillance systems are increasingly being developed to support early detection of safety signals. It is unknown what the power of such a system is for surveillance among children and adolescents. In this paper we provide estimates of the number and classes of drugs, and incidence rates (IRs) of events, that can be monitored in children and adolescents (0–18 years).

Methods

Data were obtained from seven population-based EHR databases in Denmark, Italy, and the Netherlands during the period 1996–2010. We estimated the number of drugs for which specific adverse events can be monitored as a function of actual drug use, minimally detectable relative risk (RR) and IRs for 10 events.

Results

The population comprised 4 838 146 individuals (25 575 132 person years (PYs)), who were prescribed 2170 drugs (1 610 631 PYs drug-exposure). Half of the total drug-exposure in PYs was covered by only 18 drugs (0.8%). For a relatively frequent event like upper gastrointestinal bleeding there were 39 drugs for which an association with a RR ≥4, if present, could be investigated. The corresponding number of drugs was eight for a rare event like anaphylactic shock.

Conclusion

Drug use in children is rare and shows little variation. The number of drugs with enough exposure to detect rare adverse events in children and adolescents within an EHR-based surveillance system such as EU-ADR is limited. Use of additional sources of paediatric drug exposure information and global collaboration are imperative in order to optimize EHR data for paediatric safety surveillance.     

Defects in mouse nephrogenesis induced by selective and non-selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Deletion of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene causes impairment of kidney development, but the effect of selective inhibitors of COX-2 (coxibs) or the non-selective inhibitors of COX (the classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; NSAIDs) on kidney development was less well described.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We assessed the effects of equipotent analgesic doses of celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, etoricoxib and lumiracoxib and of the NSAIDs, diclofenac and naproxen, on postpartum kidney development in mice, from postnatal day 1 (P1) to P21.

KEY RESULTS

All the COX inhibitors, at the doses used, blocked COX-2 activity by more than 80% as assayed by PGE₂ synthesis in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse blood samples. Rofecoxib, etoricoxib and lumiracoxib exerted the most marked impairment of postpartum kidney development, demonstrated by attenuation of kidney growth, reduction in size of glomeruli, increase in immature superficial glomeruli, thinning of subcapsular cortical mass and reduction in size of juxtamedullary glomeruli. These defects were less severe than those in kidneys from COX-2^−/− mice. Administration of diclofenac and naproxen revealed renal defects similar to those after coxib treatment, but both NSAIDs induced greater arrest of immature superficial glomeruli in the outer cortex and increased the number of undifferentiated proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells. Treatment with celecoxib or valdecoxib caused only minimal changes in renal morphology.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Classical NSAIDs cause similar or even stronger nephrodysgenesis than the coxibs. Also, the ranking of coxibs regarding adverse effects on renal development, using equi-analgesic doses, is rofecoxib = etoricoxib = lumiracoxib > valdecoxib > celecoxib.     

Adverse drug reactions in adult medical inpatients in a South African hospital serving a community with a high HIV/AIDS prevalence: prospective observational study

Aims

To describe the frequency, nature and preventability of community-acquired and hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in a South African hospital serving a community with a high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/ acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Methods

A 3-month prospective observational study of 665 adults admitted to two medical wards.

Results

Forty-one (6.3%) patients were admitted as a result of an ADR and 41 (6.3%) developed an ADR in hospital. Many of the ADRs (46.2%) were considered preventable, although less likely to be preventable in HIV-infected patients than in those with negative or unknown HIV status (community-acquired ADRs 2/24 vs. 35/42; P < 0.0001; hospital-acquired ADRs 3/25 vs. 14/26; P = 0.003). Patients admitted with ADRs were older than patients not admitted with an ADR (median 53 vs. 42 years, P = 0.003), but 60% of community-acquired ADRs at hospital admission were in patients <60 years old. Among patients <60 years old, those HIV infected were more likely to be admitted with an ADR [odds ratio (OR) 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17, 4.61; P = 0.017]. Among HIV-infected patients, those receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) were more likely to be admitted with an ADR than those not receiving ART (OR 10.34, 95% CI 4.50, 23.77; P < 0.0001). No ART-related ADRs were fatal. Antibiotics and drugs used for opportunistic infections were implicated in two-thirds of hospital-acquired ADRs.

Conclusions

ADRs are an important, often preventable cause of hospitalizations and inpatient morbidity in South Africa, particularly among the elderly and HIV-infected. Although ART-related injury contributed to hospital admissions, many HIV-related admissions were among patients not receiving ART, and many ADRs were associated with medicines used for managing opportunistic infections.

What is already known about this subject

• Studies conducted primarily in developed countries have shown that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant cause of hospital admission, prolong hospital stay and consequently increase the cost of disease management in patients.
• Cardiovascular medicines, hypoglycaemic agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics are the most frequently implicated medicines in these studies.
• A large proportion of these ADRs have been shown to be preventable through improved drug prescribing, administration and monitoring for adverse effects.

What this paper adds

• This is the first Sub-Saharan African study in the HIV/AIDS era that describes the contribution of ADRs to patient morbidity, hospitalisation and mortality.
• Cardiovascular medicines and antiretroviral therapy contributed the most to community-acquired ADRs at the time of hospital admission while medicines used for opportunistic infections (such as antifungals, antibiotics and antituberculosis medicines were most frequently implicated in hospital acquired ADRs.
• ADRs in HIV-infected patients were less likely to be preventable.

     

Pharmacovigilance in children: detecting adverse drug reactions in routine electronic healthcare records. A systematic review

Aims

A systematic review of the literature published in English over 10 years was undertaken in order to describe the use of electronic healthcare data in the identification of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched using MESH headings and text words. Titles, keywords and abstracts were checked for age <18 years, potential ADRs and electronic healthcare data. Information extracted included age, data source, pharmacovigilance method, medicines and ADRs. Studies were quality assessed.

Results

From 14 804 titles, 314 had a full text review and 71 were included in the final review. Fifty were published in North America, 10 in Scandinavia. Study size ranged from less than 1000 children to more than 10 million. Sixty per cent of studies used data from one source. Comparative observational studies were most commonly reported (66.2%) with 15% using passive surveillance. Electronic healthcare data set linkage and the quality of the data source were poorly reported. ADRs were classified using the International Classification of Disease (ICD10). Multi-system reactions were most commonly studied, followed by central nervous system and mental and behavioural disorders. Vaccines were most frequently prescribed followed by corticosteroids, general anaesthetics and antidepressants.

Conclusions

Routine electronic healthcare records were increasingly reported to be used for pharmacovigilance in children. This growing and important health protection activity could be enhanced by consistent reporting of studies to improve the identification, interpretation and generalizability of the evidence base.     

Drug-induced hepatic injury in children: a case/non-case study of suspected adverse drug reactions in VigiBase

AIM

To identify which drugs are associated with reports of suspected hepatic injury in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Using a worldwide pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase, we conducted a case/non-case study on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurring in the population <18 years old. Cases were all the records with hepatic ADRs and non-cases were all the other ADR records. Records regarding topically administered drugs were excluded from both groups. The association between drug and suspected hepatic ADRs was calculated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality while adjusting for gender, country, reporter and calendar year. Sub-analyses were performed within therapeutic class and by excluding vaccination-related reports to reduce confounding.

RESULTS

Overall, 6595 (1%) out of 624 673 ADR records in children and adolescents concerned hepatic injury. Most of the reported hepatic injuries concerned children 12–17 years of age. Drugs that were most frequently reported as suspected cause and were associated with hepatic injury comprised paracetamol, valproic acid, carbamazepine, methotrexate, minocycline, zidovudine, pemoline, ceftriaxone, bosentan, ciclosporin, atomoxetine, olanzapine, basiliximab, erythromycin and voriconazole. The association between hepatotoxicity and all these drugs, except for basiliximab, is already known.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-induced hepatic injury is infrequently reported (only 1% of total) as a suspected ADR in children and adolescents. The drugs associated with reported hepatotoxicity (paracetamol, antiepileptic and anti-tuberculosis agents) are known to be hepatotoxic in adults as well, but age related changes in associations were observed. VigiBase is useful as a start to plan further drug safety studies in children.