Evaluation of the Cobas TaqMan MTB test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens

The Cobas TaqMan MTB test, based on real-time PCR technology, was evaluated for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in respiratory specimens. A total of 1,093 samples from 446 patients, including 118 acid-fast smear-positive and 975 acid-fast smear-negative specimens, were investigated. Diagnostic cultures performed with 7H11 agar, Löwenstein-Jensen medium, and the Bactec MGIT 960 system were considered the reference methods. When discrepant results between the Cobas TaqMan MTB test and culture occurred, additional results from the BD MGIT TBc identification test and the GenoType Mycobacterium CM test performed on growth-positive and acid-fast-stain-positive MGIT tubes and review of the patient''s medical history were used for discrepancy analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Cobas TaqMan MTB test were 91.5%, 98.7%, 91.5%, and 98.7%, respectively. In general, the performance of the new Cobas TaqMan MTB test was comparable to that of the replaced Cobas Amplicor MTB system. The most prominent feature of the new system was its extraordinarily high sensitivity (79.5%) for detecting MTBC in smear-negative specimens; out of 44 smear-negative but culture-positive specimens, 35 were positive by the new system. The Cobas TaqMan MTB assay, including DNA extraction, can be completed within 3 h.     

Evaluation of Cobas TaqMan MTB for Direct Detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Comparison with Cobas Amplicor MTB

The Roche Cobas Amplicor MTB assay, recently replaced by the Roche Cobas TaqMan MTB assay, was one of the first commercially available assays for detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on nucleic acid amplification. We reported previously on the limited specificity of the Cobas Amplicor MTB assay, in particular for positive samples with an optical density at 660 nm (OD₆₆₀) of <2.0. Using a selected set of respiratory samples, which were scored as false positive by the Cobas Amplicor test, we demonstrate here that the specificity of the Cobas TaqMan assay is significantly improved. In addition, our study of a set of 133 clinical samples revealed that the Cobas TaqMan MTB assay showed significantly less PCR inhibition than the Cobas Amplicor test. An overall concordance of 98.2% was observed between the two assays. In a subsequent prospective study, we evaluated the performance of the Roche Cobas TaqMan MTB assay on 1,143 clinical specimens, including respiratory (n = 838) and nonrespiratory (n = 305) specimens. Using culture as the gold standard, we found a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 98.8% for the 838 respiratory specimens, compared to a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 94.6% for the 305 nonrespiratory specimens. We conclude that the Cobas TaqMan MTB assay is a significantly improved tool for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis DNA in clinical specimens.     

Evaluation of the enhanced amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the enhanced Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (E-MTD), for the direct detection of M tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in respiratory specimens. DESIGN: Two hundred seventy-four respiratory specimens from 151 patients in respiratory isolation were tested with the E-MTD, and the results were compared with the results of mycobacterial smear, culture, and the earlier form of the test, MTD-1. RESULTS: Forty-one specimens were culture positive for mycobacteria (20 MTBC and 21 nontuberculous mycobacteria), 23 of which were smear positive (16 MTBC, 7 nontuberculous mycobacteria). Twenty-four specimens were positive by E-MTD, and 21 were positive by MTD-1. Of the 20 MTBC culture-positive specimens, 19 were positive by the E-MTD and 19 were positive by the MTD-1. The remaining specimens were MTBC negative by all methods. After resolution of discrepancies, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 95.2%, 100%, 100%, 99.6% for the MTD-1 and 95.2%, 98.8%, 87.0%, and 99.6%, for the E-MTD. For the E-MTD smear-positive and smear-negative specimens, these same values were 93.8%, 100%, 100%, and 87.5% and 100%, 98.8%, 62.5%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the E-MTD is a reliable method for the direct detection of MTBC in smear-positive respiratory specimens.     

Evaluation of Cobas TaqMan MTB PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Nucleic acid-based amplification tests allow the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Recently, a real-time PCR assay for M. tuberculosis complex, the Cobas TaqMan MTB test (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), was introduced. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Cobas TaqMan MTB test system. A total of 406 specimens collected from 247 patients were simultaneously tested by conventional culture, Cobas Amplicor MTB PCR, and TaqMan MTB PCR. The cross-reactivity with other Mycobacterium species and the detection limit were also evaluated. Among 406 specimens, a total of 24 specimens (5.9%) were culture positive: 14 specimens were positive by both TaqMan and Amplicor MTB PCRs, while 5 specimens were positive by only TaqMan PCR. The remaining five specimens were negative by both PCR methods. Seven specimens with negative culture results were positive by TaqMan PCR, but five of these were negative by Amplicor MTB PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were 79.1%, 98.2%, 73.1%, and 98.7% for TaqMan and 58.3%, 99.5%, 87.5%, and 97.4% for the Amplicor MTB PCR test, respectively. There was no cross-reactivity with M. tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial species. The detection limit for the Cobas TaqMan MTB PCR test was 4.0 copies/μl. The Cobas TaqMan MTB PCR test showed higher sensitivity for detection of the M. tuberculosis complex without disturbing the specificity and NPV than the Amplicor MTB PCR test.     

Evaluation of Roche Amplicor PCR assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The Roche Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR test (RMtb-PCR) was compared with mycobacterial culture, with the BACTEC 460 system and inoculation on Lowenstein-Jensen media. Results were interpreted with an adjusted "gold standard" incorporating clinical diagnosis. A total of 1,480 clinical specimens from 1,155 patients, including tissues and fluids, as well as 141 specimens which demonstrated a positive growth index on the BACTEC 460 system were assessed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of RMtb-PCR compared with the adjusted gold standard for clinical specimens were 79, 99, 93, and 98%, respectively. In smear-positive specimens, the sensitivity of RMtb-PCR was 98% versus 53% for smear-negative specimens. When RMtb-PCR was performed two times per week, PCR results were available an average of 21 days before the culture results. For specimens demonstrating a positive growth index on the BACTEC 460 system, RMtb-PCR had a sensitivity and specificity of 98 and 100%, respectively. This study demonstrates the value of a commercial nucleic acid amplification kit for rapid diagnosis of M. tuberculosis, particularly in smear-positive specimens or BACTEC culture-positive specimens.     

Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens

A total of 217 specimens submitted for routine smear and culture from three different sites within the western United States were used to evaluate the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (for research use only) (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Overall agreement compared to culture was 89% (98% for smear positives and 72% for smear negatives) for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.     

Comparison of Amplicor, in-house PCR, and conventional culture for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples.

Five hundred four clinical specimens (337 sputum and 167 bronchial samples) from 340 patients were tested for the presence of M. tuberculosis complex by the Amplicor M. tuberculosis test and by an in-house PCR. The results were compared with those obtained by conventional culture and by direct microscopy. Thirty specimens (from 14 patients) were positive by in-house PCR, 25 (from 13 patients) were positive by the Amplicor M. tuberculosis test, and 24 (from 10 patients) were positive by culture. Cultures from 16 specimens were contaminated with other bacteria. Strong inhibition of in-house PCR was found with three samples. After discordancy analyses, with clinical data as supportive evidence for tuberculosis, 27 true-positive and 458 true-negative samples were defined. On the basis of these figures, the sensitivities of the Amplicor M. tuberculosis test, in-house PCR, culture, and microscopy were 70.4, 92.6, 88.9, and 52.4%, respectively. The specificities of all four tests were higher than 98%. The good performance of the in-house PCR for detection of M. tuberculosis makes it a very useful additional tool in M. tuberculosis diagnostics. In contrast, the Amplicor test needs to be improved. Twenty-three of the Amplicor-negative samples were further tested for inhibition of the Amplicor system by retesting the DNA extracts after the addition of M. tuberculosis DNA. In 15 of these samples, 5 true positives and 10 true negatives, inhibition of the Amplicor test was demonstrated. This might explain the lack of sensitivity of the Amplicor test. If the inhibition problem can be solved, the Amplicor M. tuberculosis test, which is already rapid, very user-friendly, and reasonably priced, may certainly become very useful in microbiological laboratories.     

Evaluation of the semiautomated Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens.

Five hundred twenty processed respiratory specimens from 326 patients received for the diagnosis of tuberculosis or other mycobacterial infections were tested by means of the LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay from Abbott Laboratories, which uses ligase chain reaction technology for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens. The results of the LCx M. tuberculosis Assay were compared with the results of culture and staining techniques. After a combination of culture results and the patient's clinical data, a total of 195 specimens were collected from 110 patients who were positively diagnosed as having pulmonary tuberculosis. Twenty-three of these 195 specimens which corresponded to 10 patients with a history of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and anti-TB treatment ranging from 1 to 6 months were culture negative. The other 172 specimens were culture positive for M. tuberculosis. With an overall positivity rate of 37.5% (195 of 520 specimens), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 90.8, 100, 100, and 94.7%, respectively, for the LCx M. tuberculosis Assay; 88.2, 100, 100, and 93.4%, respectively, for culture; and 82.6, 92, 72.9, and 97.6%, respectively, for acid-fast staining. For 161 specimens (82.6%) from patients smear positive for the disease and 34 specimens (17.4%) from patients smear negative for the disease, the sensitivity values for the LCx M. tuberculosis Assay were 98.8 and 53%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivities and specificities between the LCx M. tuberculosis Assay and culture (P > 0.05). Conclusively, the LCx M. tuberculosis Assay has proved to have an acceptable sensitivity and a high specificity in detecting M. tuberculosis and has the potential of reducing the diagnosis time to an 8-h working day.     

Diagnosis of tuberculosis by Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test: a multicenter study.

The Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test is a new PCR assay for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical samples. A multicenter study that included six laboratories was done to evaluate the Amplicor test in comparison with direct microscopy and culture (solid or radiometric media), and the culture method was used as the "gold standard." A total of 2,073 specimens, i.e., 1,749 respiratory specimens and 324 other specimens, were tested. A total of 184 cultures yielded M. tuberculosis. Of these 184 cultures, 77 (42%) were smear negative and 23 (12.5%) concerned extrapulmonary specimens. The sensitivity of the Amplicor test for all of the specimens and for extrapulmonary, smear-positive, and smear-negative specimens was 86, 83, 94.5, and 74%, respectively. The sensitivity of direct microscopy in comparison with that of culture was 58%. A total of 95% of patients with culture-proven tuberculosis were diagnosed by the Amplicor test, whereas direct microscopy detected mycobacteria in only 72% of these patients. The Amplicor test exhibited a high degree of specificity (98%). The assay was very rapid and easy to perform.     

Interpreting the results of the amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of M. tuberculosis rRNA

The Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct (AMTD) test detects M. tuberculosis rRNA. By using culture of M. tuberculosis as a gold standard, a number of different diagnostic indices were examined in an attempt to determine the diagnostic performance of the AMTD test and demonstrate how it might usefully be interpreted during the early management of disease.     

Clinical Evaluation of the Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in select nonrespiratory specimens

The performance of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis was evaluated by testing 178 nonrespiratory specimens from 158 patients. Criteria for specimen inclusion were (i) a positive smear for acid-fast bacilli (n = 54) and (ii) the source if the smear was negative (tissue biopsies and aspirates and abscess material were tested; n = 124). Results were compared to those of mycobacterial culture; clinical history was reviewed when MTD and culture results disagreed. Forty-eight specimens (27.0%) were positive for mycobacteria, including 23 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex specimens; of which 21 were smear positive. Twenty-five specimens were MTD positive; 20 of these grew M. tuberculosis complex. All of the five MTD-positive, M. tuberculosis complex culture-negative specimens were considered truly positive, based on review of the medical record. Of the three MTD-negative, M. tuberculosis complex culture-positive specimens, two contained inhibitory substances; one of the two was smear positive. Excluding the latter specimen from analysis, after chart review, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MTD were 92.6, 100, 100, and 98.7%, respectively, by specimen and 89.5, 100, 100, and 98.6% by patient. Given the few smear-negative samples from patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis in our study, additional similar studies that include more smear-negative, M. tuberculosis complex culture-positive specimens to confirm our data are desirable.     

Comparison of enhanced Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplified direct test with COBAS AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens

The new Roche COBAS AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay was compared to the Gen-Probe enhanced Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplified Direct Test (AMTDII). A total of 486 specimens (296 respiratory and 190 extrapulmonary) collected from 323 patients were tested in parallel with both assays. Results were compared with those of acid-fast staining and culture, setting the combination of culture and clinical diagnosis as the "gold standard." After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for AMTDII were 85.7, 100, 100, and 90.4% for respiratory specimens and 82.9, 100, 100, and 95. 5% for extrapulmonary specimens, respectively. The corresponding values for AMPLICOR were 94.2, 100, 100, and 96.6% for respiratory specimens and 85, 100, 100, and 96.1% for extrapulmonary specimens, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the results of both assays or, within each one, between respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens. The difference between AMTDII and AMPLICOR sensitivities was related to the presence of inhibitory samples, which the former assay, lacking an internal amplification control (IAC), could not detect. The overall inhibition rate for the AMPLICOR assay was 3.9% (19 specimens). It is concluded that, although both amplification assays proved to be rapid and specific for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex in clinical samples, AMPLICOR, by a completely automated amplification and detection procedure, was shown to be particularly feasible for a routine laboratory setting. Finally, AMTDII is potentially an excellent diagnostic technique for both respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens, provided that an IAC is included with the assay.     

Evaluation of the rapid MGIT TBc identification test for culture confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strain detection

A culture confirmation test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains that uses a lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay to detect the MPB64 antigen, the MGIT TBc identification (TBc ID) test, has been developed. We evaluated the performance of the TBc ID test in the detection of the M. tuberculosis complex in 222 primary-positive liquid cultures. We compared these results to those of nucleic acid-based identification and conventional biochemical tests. The validity of the TBc ID test was determined, and all of the nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and Nocardia species tested were found to be negative. The detection limit of the TBc ID test was 5 × 10(5) CFU/ml, and for IS6110 real-time PCR it was 5 CFU/ml. All of the M. tuberculosis and M. africanum cultures were found to be positive, while M. bovis and M. bovis BCG cultures were negative. With the exception of 1 contaminated culture, the 221 culture-positive isolates contained 171 (77.5%) M. tuberculosis isolates, 39 (17.6%) NTM species, and 11 (5.0%) unidentified species. Two culture-positive isolates harbored a 63-bp deletion at position 196 of the mpb64 gene. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the TBc ID test were 98.8, 100, 100, and 95.1%, respectively. Furthermore, the approximate turnaround time for real-time PCR was 4 h (including buffer and sample preparation), while for the TBc ID test it was less than 1 h. We suggest an algorithm for the primary identification of M. tuberculosis in liquid culture using the TBc ID test as an alternative to conventional subculture followed by identification using biochemical methods.     

Evaluation of a modified gen-probe amplified direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in cerebrospinal fluid

Laboratory evidence for tuberculous meningitis is difficult to acquire due to the low numbers of organisms present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the presence of nucleic acid amplification inhibitors. The Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD) is sensitive and specific for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory samples but has not been approved for CSF. We evaluated a modified version of the current MTD, optimized for use with CSF samples. Samples were prepared by spiking CSF with various numbers of M. tuberculosis complex organisms. The modified MTD performance was compared with results obtained using a purified RNA sample extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy Protect Bacteria Mini Kit. By use of CSF artificially spiked with M. tuberculosis complex, the sensitivity of the modified MTD was 100% (six of six) for CSF samples containing approximately 600 CFU/ml, 78% (seven of nine) for approximately 60 CFU/ml, 50% (three of six) for 6 CFU/ml, and 17% (one of six) for samples with <1 CFU/ml. The specificity of the modified MTD method was 100% (22 of 22). The sensitivity of the Qiagen MTD method was 100% for CSF samples containing approximately 600 CFU/ml (six of six) and approximately 60 CFU/ml (nine of nine), 50% for samples with approximately 6 CFU/ml (three of six), and 50% for samples with <1 CFU/ml (three of six). The specificity of the Qiagen MTD method was 86% (19 of 22). With the Qiagen MTD method, however, initial results were equivocal for 14 of the 27 (52%) positive samples, requiring repeat analysis, whereas with the modified MTD, only 1 of 27 (4%) was equivocal. The modified MTD for CSF samples was less time-consuming and less expensive and resulted in considerably fewer equivocal results than the Qiagen MTD method did.     

Evaluation of methods for rapid detection of resistance to isoniazid and rifampin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected in the Caribbean

The rapid identification of drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is crucial for the timely initiation of appropriate antituberculosis therapy. The performance of the Genotype MTBDRplus assay was compared with that of the Bactec 460 TB system, a “gold standard” culture-based method. The Genotype MTBDRplus assay was quicker and more cost-effective for the detection of rifampin resistance, but it was not as good for the detection of isoniazid-resistant strains in our setting.     

Quantitative culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical sputum specimens and dilution endpoint of its detection by the Amplicor PCR assay.

The minimum number of Mycobacterium tuberculosis CFU detectable in clinical sputum specimens by the Amplicor PCR test was estimated by performing the test on duplicate samples of quantitatively cultured serial dilutions of sputum. Positive PCR test results were obtained for all samples that contained 42 CFU of M. tuberculosis. The detection limits of the PCR assay for decontaminated (N-acetyl-L-cysteine [NALC]-NaOH) and nondecontaminated (NALC only) specimens were equivalent, even though the number of CFU cultured from decontaminated samples was only 11 to 20% of the number cultured from nondecontaminated samples. Thus, the 42 CFU that could be detected in nondecontaminated specimens by the Amplicor PCR test correspond to the approximately 8 CFU (0.20 x 42) that could be recovered in culture after decontamination with NALC-NaOH.     

Prospective clinical evaluation of Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR test as a screening method in a low-prevalence population.

Of 656 respiratory samples analyzed for Mycobacterium tuberculosis by microscopy, culture, and the Amplicor PCR method, 25 were positive by culture, 12 were positive by microscopy, and 17 were positive by the Amplicor PCR method; 16 samples were Amplicor PCR positive and culture negative. No patient except one with culture-negative, Amplicor PCR-positive samples had clinical indications of tuberculosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the Amplicor PCR compared with those of culture were 68 and 97.4%, respectively. For culture-positive, smear-negative samples, the sensitivity of the Amplicor PCR was 46%.     

Comparison of in-house PCR with conventional techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis kit for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

PURPOSE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, introduced as a fast and sensitive diagnostic method, is useful in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of in-house PCR assay in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by comparing PCR results with conventional diagnostic techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis kit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of in-house PCR method employed for the amplification IS6110 sequences in 2,973 specimens. We also compared in-house PCR with Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis kit in 120 specimens collected from June to July 2006. Routine acid-fast stain (AFS) and culture assay were also performed and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,973 cases, 2,832 cases (95.3%) showed consistent results between in house PCR, AFS and culture methods, whereas 141 (4.7%) displayed inconsistent results. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 77.5%, 99.7%, 95.5%, and 98.0%, respectively for PCR; 49.2%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively, for AFS method; and 80.7%, 100%, 100%, and 98.3%, respectively, for culture assay. Consistent results between PCR and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis kit were shown in 109 cases (90.8%). The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 81.3%, 98.9%, 96.3%, and 93.5% respectively for PCR and 71.9%, 100%, 100%, and 90.7%, respectively, for Cobas Amplicor kit. CONCLUSION: In-house PCR and Cobas Amplicor kit show high sensitivity and specificity, and are reliable tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.     

Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with an IS6110-TaqMan real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

The sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and an in-house IS6110-based real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (IS6110-TaqMan assay) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA were compared by use of 117 clinical specimens (97 culture positive and 20 culture negative for MTBC) that were frozen in sediment. The 97 clinical specimens included 60 respiratory and 37 nonrespiratory specimens distributed into 36 smear-positive and 61 smear-negative specimens. Among the 97 culture-positive specimens, 4 had rifampin-resistant isolates. Both methods were highly specific and exhibited excellent sensitivity (100%) with smear-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with the whole smear-negative specimens was more reduced than that of the IS6110-TaqMan assay (48 versus 69%, P = 0.005). Both methods exhibited similar sensitivities with smear-negative respiratory specimens, but the Xpert MTB/RIF test had lower sensitivity with smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens than the IS6110-TaqMan assay (37 versus 71%, P = 0.013). Finally, the sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and the IS6110-TaqMan assay were 79% and 84%, respectively, with respiratory specimens and 53% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.013), with nonrespiratory specimens. The Xpert MTB/RIF test correctly detected the rifampin resistance in smear-positive specimens but not in the one smear-negative specimen. The Xpert MTB/RIF test is a simple rapid method well adapted to a routine laboratory that appeared to be as sensitive as the IS6110-TaqMan assay with respiratory specimens but less sensitive with paucibacillary specimens, such as smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens.