Minimally invasive thyroidectomy

Background: Conventional thyroidectomies by a direct approach through the neck require long incisions in the neck that can result in prominent scars, hypesthesia, and paresthesia. Minimally invasive procedures have recently been adopted for the surgical treatment of thyroid disease as a means of preventing such problems. Methods: In the present paper, the anterior chest approach and axillary approach to endoscopic thyroidectomy are described. Results: Twenty‐two patients were treated by the anterior chest approach to endoscopic thyroidectomy and 28 patients by the axillary approach. The only complication was one case of postoperative emphysema. The patients were satisfied with the cosmetic results of the procedures and with the minimal degree of postoperative hypesthesia, paresthesia and discomfort. Conclusion: Endoscopic thyroidectomy may become the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of carefully selected patients with thyroid disease.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND: In this paper we describe the results of our personal technique for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT). METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were selected for MIVAT. Selection criteria were nodule size less than 30 mm, thyroid volume less than 20 mL, no thyroiditis, no previous neck surgery or irradiation. The procedure, totally gasless, is carried out through a 15-mm central incision above the sternal notch. Dissection is performed under endoscopic vision, using conventional and endoscopic instruments. RESULTS: We performed 51 lobectomies and 15 total thyroidectomies. Mean operative time was 73.6 minutes for lobectomy and 109.6 minutes for total thyroidectomy. Conversion to open procedure was required twice (3%). We observed 2 cases of transient postoperative hypocalcemia and 1 case of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. The cosmetic result was considered excellent by most patients. CONCLUSIONS: MIVAT is safe and feasible. The indications are limited at present, but the results are encouraging, and we are optimistic about the future expansion of its applicability.     

Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy

We recently developed a new surgical technique for carrying out thyroidectomy, to minimize tissue trauma by obviating unnecessary neck exploration. This report describes our technique of performing minimally invasive open thyroidectomy and compares the results with those of conventional thyroidectomy. Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy was performed by making a small skin incision, 3.0–4.5 cm long, and approaching the thyroid directly via a transverse divi-sion of the strap muscles without raising skin flaps. The outcomes of 466 patients who underwent a minimally invasive open thyroidectomy were retrospectively compared with those of 437 patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy for various types of thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference in the extent of surgery between the group of patients who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy and the group of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy. However, the length of the skin incision, at 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 9.6 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, operative time, at 57.6 ± 11.7 vs 85.2 ± 32.3 min, respectively, blood loss, at 18.4 ± 15.3 vs 43.1 ± 21.8 ml, respectively, and hospital stay, at 1.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia was significantly less in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group. These results show that minimally invasive open thyroidectomy provides surgeons with a clear operative field, and that it has proven to be simple, safe, and practical for selected patients. Received: September 11, 2000 / Accepted: March 6, 2001     

Minimally invasive, nonendoscopic saphenectomy for coronary bypass surgery

In 200 consecutive patients who underwent elective and emergency coronary bypass surgery, a minimally invasive, nonendoscopic technique for greater saphenous vein harvesting was used and the clinical results evaluated. The technique is easy, rapid, and routinely applicable in elective and emergency coronary bypass procedures. The cosmetic effect is excellent and the saphenectomy-related morbidity low.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy in pediatric patients

Background

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of both benign diseases and malignancies. We report our experience in thyroid surgery in pediatric patients.

Methods

From October 1998 to December 2005, 35 patients (27 females and 8 males) underwent MIVAT for thyroid disease. The mean age was 14.0 years (range, 8-18 years); mean ecographically estimated thyroid volume was 11.13 mL (range, 8-25 mL).

Results

A total thyroidectomy was performed in 22 patients, whereas lobectomy was performed in 13. Two patients of the latter group had a second lobectomy for a false-negative result at frozen section during the first operation. One patient underwent also a prophylactic central neck dissection for positive RET oncogene. The histologic examination found a papillary carcinoma in 11 patients, a microfollicular nodule in 7 patients, and multinodular goiter in 17 patients. The mean operative time was 54.1 minutes for thyroidectomy (range, 25-110 minutes) and 38.5 minutes for lobectomy (range, 20-65 minutes). All patients but one was discharged on the first postoperative day. One transient hypoparathyroidism was observed in the patient who underwent total thyroidectomy plus central neck lymphadenectomy.

Conclusions

The MIVAT technique proved to be as safe and effective as conventional thyroidectomy with Kocher approach to treat patients with both benign and malignant diseases of the thyroid gland. The advantages of MIVAT are represented by a better and faster postoperative course and an improved aesthetic result, which is particularly important in this group of patients.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: multiinstitutional experience

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) was described in 1998. In this study we collected the experience of four third-level referral centers that adopted this technique. A total of 336 patients (279 females, 57 males) were selected for MIVAT. Selection criteria were thyroid volume <15 ml, nodules not exceeding 3.5 cm of diameter, and an absence of thyroiditis, previous neck surgery, or previous irradiation. The procedure, totally gasless, is carried out through a 15 mm central incision above the sternal notch. Dissection is performed under endoscopic vision using conventional and endoscopic instruments. The mean operating time was 69.4 ± 30.6 minutes for lobectomy (range 20–150 minutes) and 87.4 ± 43.5 minutes for total thyroidectomy (range 30–220 minutes). The mean postoperative stay was 1.9 ± 0.8 days. Postoperative complications were 7 transient and 1 definitive recurrent nerve palsies and 11 cases of hypoparathyroidism (9 transient, 2 definitive). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 15 patients (4.5%). This study confirms in a large number of cases the safety and feasibility of MIVAT, even in different surgical settings where similar results were achieved. The complication rate was not different from that of standard thyroidectomy. Although the operating time appears longer than with conventional procedures, the learning curve demonstrates a sharp decrease with increasing experience and the introduction of new technologies. The number of patients eligible for this approach remains low, thereby limiting its use, but it should be considered a valid option in selected surgical centers, offering some advantages to patients in terms of cosmetic results and postoperative distress.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: A cost-effective analysis

Objective

To compare the cost of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) with conventional thyroidectomy.

Study Design

A cost-effectiveness study and chart review.

Setting

Academic university hospital.

Subjects and Methods

Pediatric and adult patients referred to the Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery for suspicious thyroid nodules, goiters, or known carcinomas. A tertiary care hospital's billing department was queried for all hemithyroidectomies and total thyroidectomies completed by the Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery between January 5, 2006, and November 1, 2007. The charges, including surgery, hospital, pathology, and anesthesia, for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and traditional or minimally invasive open thyroidectomies meeting MIVAT inclusion criteria were then reviewed retrospectively and compared statistically.

Results

A total of 185 thyroidectomies were performed, 50.3 percent of which met criteria for MIVAT. Length of stay (days) was significantly shorter for patients undergoing MIVAT hemithyroidectomy (mean difference −0.8; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] −1.08 to −0.52) and not significantly different between groups for total thyroidectomy (mean difference 0.1; 95% CI −0.36 to 0.56). Mean anesthesia cost (U.S.$) was similar between groups for hemi- and total thyroidectomies. MIVAT mean pathology cost was significantly less than open thyroidectomy for hemithyroidectomy (mean difference −89.9; 95% CI −179.01 to −0.79) and approached significance for total thyroidectomy. There was no significant difference in hospital cost and total cost for hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy.

Conclusion

In a group of matched cohorts, the cost of MIVAT appears to be equal to that of open thyroidectomy.     

Minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT)

Minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) was first used in Pisa in 1998. The technique is characterized by a unique central access and external retraction. There is controversy about the validity and limited indications of this and other minimally invasive thyroidectomy techniques, but MIVAT looks promising. The results of MIVAT, in 5 years experience, are similar to those of traditional thyroidectomy.     

Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy by a cervical approach

Background: The technique of thyroidectomy mandates adequate visualization of the operative field to identify pertinent anatomical structures. The purpose of this prospective review was to assess the feasability and safety of endoscopic thyroidectomy by a cervical approach. Methods: All patients who underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy were assessed by retrospective review of a prospective database. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy by a cervical approach. Thirty-five of 38 cases were successfully completed endoscopically with a mean OR time of 190 min. One patient experienced a permanent recurrent laryngeal palsy. Conclusion: Endoscopic thyroidectomy by a cervical approach is a feasible procedure. As in conventional thyroid surgery, great care should be exercised when dissecting the recurrent laryngeal nerve.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 300 cases

Background

We report on patients selected for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) over a 3-year period and evaluate the feasibility and effects of this procedure.

Methods

Between March 2005 and August 2008, 300 patients (36 male, 264 female; mean age = 54.6 years) underwent MIVAT using a single central incision with an average length of 2 cm (range = 1.5–3 cm), about 2 cm above the sternal notch. Small conventional retractors and dissectors, ultrasonic scalpel, 5-mm laparoscope, and a video screen were the instruments used.

Results

General anesthesia was used in 295 patients and regional block anesthesia in 5. MIVAT was performed successfully in 280 patients (93.3%). Conversion to open thyroidectomy with a 4-cm-long incision was required to achieve selective lymphadenectomy in 18 patients after frozen sections demonstrated differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Only two patients with benign thyroid nodules were converted because of large volume or massive hemorrhage from the upper pole vessels. Mean operative time was 35 min (range = 20–70 min) for unilateral lobectomy and 58 min (35–90 min) for bilateral thyroidectomy. No patients had wound infections, postoperative bleeding that required reoperation, permanent hypoparathyroidism, or bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. However, permanent unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy appeared in five cases (1.7%), transient unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in seven (2.3%), superior laryngeal nerve injury in five (1.7%), transient hypocalcemia in nine (3.0%), and mild skin burn from the ultrasonic scalpel in five (1.7%). Postoperative pain was minimal and better cosmetic results were obtained than conventional open thyroidectomy. Postoperative stay was shorter than with conventional open thyroidectomy.

Conclusions

MIVAT appears to be safe and feasible in patients with benign thyroid nodules, with minimal injury and excellent cosmetic results. Furthermore, after properly lengthening the skin incision, MIVAT can be used for patients with large benign thyroid nodules or even early–stage differentiated thyroid carcinoma.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted approach for partial and total thyroidectomy

Background: We report our initial experience with partial and total thyroidectomy using a video-assisted approach. The feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of this technique are examined. Methods: Between January and May 2000, 28 patients were select to undergo a thyroid lobectomy (n = 17) or total thyroidectomy (n = 11) by a video-assisted cervical approach. Patient selection was based on clinical examination and preoperative ultrasonography. The surgical procedures were conducted under general anesthesia through a minimal substernal skin incision. Frozen sections were examined peroperatively in all cases. Results: The initial diagnosis was solitary nodule in 19 patients and multinodular goiter in 8 patients. One patient was treated for hyperthyroidism. The mean cranio-caudal axis and transverse diameter of the resected specimen were 4.9 ± 0.9 and 2.7 ± 0.5 cm, respectively, and the mean total lobar weight was 11.9 ± 5.5 g. Conversion to conventional surgery was required in three patients (10.7%), due to local bleeding in all cases. The mean operative times were 150 ± 8.2 and 102.5 ± 17 min for total and partial thyroidectomy, respectively. The laryngeal nerve was identified in 94.8% of cases. The mean length of skin incision was 25.4 ± 2 mm. There was one case of postoperative hypocalcemia and one case of postoperative hoarseness. One patient had a transient vocal cord palsy. The postoperative hospital stay was 1 day for 66.7% of patients. The pain intensity evaluation, performed on postoperative day 1 using the visual analogue scale (VAS) method, was 1.9 ± 1.4. Conclusion: Video-assisted thyroidectomy is feasible, safe, and effective in selected cases. Benefits for the patients in terms of postoperative pain, hospital stay, and cosmesis still need to be assessed in a prospective trial comparing standard open and video-assisted approaches.     

Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: an emerging standard of care

Virtually all disciplines of surgery now offer some version of minimal access surgical techniques. Because of the challenges related to gas insufflation in the head and neck, endoscopic surgery in this region remains in its infancy. Miccoli and his group at the University of Pisa are responsible for developing a surgical approach that relies on endoscopic and ultrasonic technology, which is easily the most widely practiced technique by minimal access surgeons around the globe. Video-assisted thyroid surgical techniques have emerged as the most feasible compromise between ample exposure and minimal access surgery. In addition to the application of technology, modern thyroid surgery incorporates a number of departures from classical training, including marking of the patient upright in the holding area, no or minimal neck extension, infrequent use of a drain, and outpatient surgery. We have emphasized the concept of customizing the procedure to the patient and disease characteristics, rather than the reverse. Therefore, a spectrum of surgical techniques can be helpful, particularly for the inexperienced minimal access thyroid surgeon. Correspondingly, staging of minimally invasive thyroidectomy has been recommended in order to allow for both uniform reporting of outcome measures across patient populations and a logical basis for determining patient eligibility. With an increasingly sophisticated public, which has virtually unlimited access to medical information, the burden will be on the modern thyroid surgeon to stay abreast of surgical or technical improvements that will yield superior outcomes. Looking forward, it would seem inevitable that continued technologic advances will help surgeons achieve less invasive, safer, and more easily performed procedures.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, development of videolaparoscopic surgery allowed several operations to be performed with minimally invasive techniques, making them less invasive and painful. Neck surgery was also involved in this effort, in spite of the skepticism shown by some authors. STUDY DESIGN: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy was developed in 1998, and since then, about 600 operations have been performed. Access was the same as was previously described for parathyroidectomy; it was based on a small central incision (1.5 cm) and on external retraction without neck insufflation. RESULTS: From July 1998 to October 2003, 579 patients were selected from 5,450 for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. The operation consisted of a total thyroidectomy in 312 patients and lobectomy in 267 patients. Mean operative time was 41 +/- 19.5 minutes (range 15 to 120 minutes) for lobectomy and 51.6 +/- 18.8 minutes (range 30 to 140 minutes) for total thyroidectomy. Postoperative hospital stay was 24 hours (overnight discharge) for all patients. Complications were postoperative bleeding (0.1%), recurrent nerve palsy (1.3%), and definitive hypoparathyroidism (0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: After 5 years of experience using this approach for various indications, we achieved a good esthetic result with an operative time comparable to that of conventional open surgery. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy was found to be a safe operation, with advantages over traditional procedures represented by better cosmetic outcomes and postoperative course, as demonstrated by visual analogue scales and statistically analyzed numeric scales.     

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy in a general surgery department

Background

We retrospectively evaluated a series of patients who underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) to define its advantages or disadvantages.

Methods

Between May 2005 and March 2008, 68 patients underwent MIVAT. Sixty-nine patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy (CT) during the period before the introduction of the MIVAT technique in our department—chosen with the same inclusion criteria used for MIVAT—served as matched controls. The eligibility criteria for both groups was thyroid nodules ≤35 mm, thyroid volume <25 ml, no thyroiditis, and no previous surgery.

Results

Forty-five MIVAT and 43 CT patients underwent hemithyroidectomy. Twenty-three MIVAT and 26 CT patients underwent total thyroidectomy. No differences were found in terms of complications, operative time, and radicality of the procedure. Patients who underwent MIVAT experienced significantly less pain, better cosmetic results, and shorter hospital stay than patients who underwent conventional surgery

Conclusion

The MIVAT technique, in selected patients, seems to be a valid option for thyroidectomy and even preferable to conventional surgery because of its significant advantages, especially in terms of cosmetic results, postoperative pain, and postoperative recovery.     

内镜辅助的甲状腺切除术(附8例报告)

目的探讨内镜辅助甲状腺切除术的可行性.方法回顾性分析2002年9月～2004年9月我院8例甲状腺良性结节的患者,进行内镜辅助微创甲状腺腺叶切除的临床资料. 结果手术均获成功,手术时间90～150 min,平均120min.术中失血10～30ml,平均20 ml.无并发症,无中转手术.术后3～4 d均痊愈出院.8例随访6～12个月,平均9个月,伤口愈合良好,无感觉不适.结论内镜辅助的甲状腺切除术安全有效,并具有明显美容效果.