Multimedia article. Lateral lymph node dissection with preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced lower rectal cancer through a laparoscopic approach

Background  

Lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection contributes to a decrease in local recurrence and prolongs survival in locally advanced lower rectal cancer patients as compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone [1, 2]. However, this procedure is also accompanied by increased bleeding and postoperative complications [3, 4]. Recently, laparoscopic TME has become a safe and feasible approach for lower rectal cancer even after preoperative chemoradiation [5–7]. Laparoscopic LLN dissection could be the next promising approach and could not only provide a survival benefit but also minimize bleeding and postoperative complications with enhanced visualization, as reported in gynecological and urological malignancies [8, 9].     

Transanal specimen retrieval using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) system in minimally invasive colon resection

Back ground  

During laparoscopic colectomy, the specimen is retrieved through substantial incisions, which increase postoperative pain, wound infections, and incisional hernias [1–3]. In the era of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), incisionless transrectal approaches for colon resections have been investigated with promising results [4–6]. Transanal retrieval of the colonic specimen in laparoscopic colectomy has been described but not widely adopted [7–12], although it seems to be an appealing step towards NOTES colectomy. We have used the TEM rectoscope (Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) as a retrieval conduit, which facilitates transanal extraction of the specimen, and protects the rectal edge and anal sphincter during laparoscopic left colectomy.     

Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy

Background

A robotic system (da Vinci^® Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has technical advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery because it increases the precision and accuracy of anatomical dissection. The present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) and laparoscopic ISR for distal rectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent robot- or laparoscopy-assisted ISR for rectal cancer between March 2008 and July 2011 were included in this retrospective comparative study. Perioperative and postoperative data, including complications and early functional outcomes, were analyzed between the two groups. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Wexner scoring system, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function.

Results

A total of 40 patients underwent robot-assisted and 40 underwent laparoscopic ISR. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (235.5 vs. 185.4 min; p < 0.001). Transabdominal ISR, in which intersphincteric dissection is completed in the pelvic cavity, was performed more with robotic assistance than with laparoscopic surgery (8 vs. 2 cases; p = 0.043). No difference was observed between groups regarding postoperative morbidity and pathological outcomes. The robot-assisted group showed a trend toward less postoperative blood loss and early recovery of functional outcomes.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted surgery was safe and effective for ISR of distal rectal cancer and showed surgical outcomes similar to those of the latest laparoscopic ISR. The favorable results of the robot-assisted ISR included reduced adaptation time, alleviated difficulty of perineal phase, and early recovery of functional outcomes in this analysis of short-term clinical outcomes.     

Radiofrequency fulguration of␣the␣spleen under␣laparoscopy to␣stop iatrogenic hemorrhage

Background  

Iatrogenic splenic injury is a potentially serious complication of laparoscopic surgery associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It also has an impact on the prognosis of patients who undergo surgery for digestive cancer [1]. For iatrogenic splenic injury, splenic salvage is the ultimate goal. Various surgical techniques have been developed to achieve hemostasis of the spleen. Radiofrequency fulguration (RF) is reported to be a safe method in an animal trauma model [2, 3]. However, only three articles report RF for the control of splenic hemorrhage in human patients [4–6].     

Laparoscopy distinctive technique for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection: medial approach for laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery

Background  

Suprapancreatic lymph node (LN) dissection is critical for gastric cancer surgery. Until currently, a number of laparoscopic gastrectomy procedures have been performed in the same manner as open surgery procedures [3, 4, 6]. Using the characteristic of laparoscopic surgery, the authors developed a new technique of suprapancreatic LN dissection.     

Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results

Background  

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy is regarded as a safe and effective treatment for benign and borderline malignant pancreatic lesions [1, 2]. However, its application for left-sided pancreatic cancer is still debatable [3, 4]. No general consensus, no standardized technique, and no surgical indication exist in applying the laparoscopic approach to left-sided pancreatic cancer.     

Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

Background  

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is helpful in the management of patients with low rectal cancer. With the advent of this technique, the need for performance of abdominoperineal resection seems to have decreased in patients with very low rectal tumors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, the functional outcome, and the short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic ISR for low rectal adenocarcinoma at our institution.     

Robot-Assisted Spleen-Preserving Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Background  

Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy would be an ideal approach for benign and borderline malignant tumors in the distal pancreas.1 However, this procedure requires advanced surgical experience and technique because of the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery.2     

Radical lymphadenectomy for advanced colon cancer via separation of the mesocolon into two layers as in filleting fish

Background  

Radical lymphadenectomy for advanced colon cancer performed via the medial approach improves oncologic outcomes. However, D3 radical lymphadenectomy possesses some unresolved problems such as the complicated vascular anatomy and concerns over surgical morbidity [1–5]. The authors present a simple and safe procedure for laparoscopic right or left hemicolectomy using a medial approach to overcome these problems. The key characteristic of their procedure is separation of the mesocolon into two layers along the superior or inferior mesenteric artery, showing the course of these branches under the mantle of the vascular sheath. This procedure resembles filleting fish into two pieces.     

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer

Background  

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging concept that could offer excellent cosmetic results [1]. The authors describe an index case of curatively intended resection of early-stage sigmoid colon cancer using this technique [2, 3].     

Sphincter-saving resection for low rectal cancer

R0 resection, preservation of the anal sphincter, and local control are considered to be the most important target criteria in rectal cancer surgery. Many efforts have been made in recent years to increase the rate of sphincter preservation by performing pull-through operations, ultra-low anterior resection (U-LAR), and intersphincteric resection (ISR). U-LAR is the standard surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer to preserve anal function. Reconstruction in U-LAR is mainly performed using stapled anastomosis. Although conventional coloanal anastomosis makes it possible to preserve the anal sphincter, the mechanical methods are difficult. In that case, almost all the internal sphincter is preserved. The final options for preserving the sphincter are ISR and external sphincter resection (ESR). Although the internal sphincter is sacrificed partially, subtotally, or totally in ISR, and the external sphincter is resected partially or extensively in ESR, complete or incomplete anal function is maintained. However, the literature is not clear regarding long-term oncologic outcome and anal function after these procedures. The application of these surgical techniques can reduce the rate of abdominoperineal resection in very low rectal cancer. The indications for these procedures must be carefully determined based on tumor site and stage as well as the patient's own preference.     

Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

Background  

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR.     

Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma at segment 7: the posterior approach to anatomic resection

Background  

Open anatomical liver resections remain one of the most effective treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and results in better recurrence-free and overall survival compared to nonanatomical resections [1]. On the other hand, laparoscopic hepatectomies for HCC have recently emerged with the benefits of reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less severe wound pain [2, 3]. Classically, liver lesions considered suitable for laparoscopic resection were those small tumors (<4 cm) located over the anterior and left lateral segments [3]. However, we would like to expand the current indications and here we present our techniques of laparoscopic anatomical resection for a HCC that was located at right posteriosuperior segment 7.     

Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultralow Anterior Resection of the Rectum (The APPEAR Technique): A Video Demonstration

Background  

Sphincter-saving rectal resections have become commonplace in the surgical treatment of malignant rectal pathology. However, restoration of gastrointestinal continuity by means of conventional techniques proves technically challenging in cases of very low rectal pathology, with resultant variable requirements for a permanent stoma. The APPEAR procedure (Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultralow Anterior Resection of the rectum) is a novel sphincter-saving resection technique to restore gastrointestinal continuity in those who would otherwise require a permanent stoma with conventional abdominal resections. It ensures that the distal rectum is excised and the anastomosis is constructed under direct vision while simultaneously preserving the anal sphincter and its somatic nerve supply in their entirety.     

Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer

Background

Intersphincter resection (ISR) is considered to be a superior technique offering sphincter preservation in patients with ultralow rectal cancer.1 Because high-definition laparoscopy offers wider and clearer vision into the narrow pelvic cavity and intersphincteric space, ISR has been further refined.2 However, functional outcome after ISR has not been optimal. More than half of patients receiving ISR suffer partial or even complete anal incontinence.3 We therefore propose a laparoscopic-assisted modified ISR, with the aim of improving sphincter function following ISR.

Methods

The video describes the technique for performing such laparoscopic-assisted modified ISR in a 62-year-old woman with ultralow rectal cancer (3 cm from anal verge). Preoperative staging by endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging revealed stage I rectal cancer (cT₂N₀M₀). The operation consisted of an abdominal and a perineal phase. The abdominal phase routinely involved colonic mobilization with high ligation of inferior mesenteric vessels, total mesorectal excision (TME), as well as transabdominal intersphincteric dissection. The procedure for laparoscopic TME was performed according to our published method.4 Along the TME dissection plane, the puborectalis could be reached and the intersphincteric space was entered posterolaterally. The hiatal ligament at the posterior side of the rectum was transected afterwards. The dissection of the intersphincteric space was continued caudally at the anterior side of the rectum. The distal bowel wall was mobilized for 2 cm from the lower edge of the tumor to obtain adequate distal margin. At this point, circular dissection of the intersphincteric space was completed. After the abdominal phase, perineal dissection was performed with wide exposure by use of a hooked self-retaining retractor. The lower margin of the tumor was identified under direct vision. We developed a modified ISR technique. Resection of the mucosa and internal sphincter was initiated 2 cm distal to the lower edge of the tumor at the tumor side to obtain the necessary distal margin. Meanwhile, at the opposite side of the tumor, the resection line was just above the dentate line so that partial dentate line could be preserved. After removal of the specimen en bloc per anus, the pelvic cavity was generously irrigated with diluted povidone iodine solutions. The distal margin of the specimen was then examined by frozen section for presence of cancer. If clear, coloanal anastomosis was performed using a handsewn technique. The colon was rotated 90° and anastomosed to the anal canal with interrupted absorbable 3–0 sutures. Finally, a pelvic suction drain was placed, and a temporary diverting stoma made in the terminal ileum.

Results

There were no intraoperative complications. The operating time was 180 min. Blood loss was 50 mL. The distal margin was clear, and the final pathology was pT₂N₀M₀. The patient underwent an uneventful recovery. She began sphincter-strengthening exercises 2 weeks after surgery. The stoma was closed after examinations 3 months later. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was found. At 12-month follow-up, in terms of sphincteric function, the patient was continent to solids, liquids, and flatus.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic-assisted modified intersphincter resection for ultralow rectal cancer is safe and feasible. This technique should be considered whenever possible as a means to offer sphincter preservation and improve sphincter function in patients with ultralow rectal cancer.

     

Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer – electronic supplementary: op-video

Background  

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has been proved in various studies. The minimal invasive procedure is feasible and safe which was demonstrated in many studies. However, the results of prospective, randomized studies providing valuable evidence are still not available. Compared to conventional surgery, the laparoscopic technique has short-term advantages including less pain, shorter duration of postoperative ileus, less fatigue, better pulmonary function, and less blood loss (Leung et al., Lancet 363:1187–1192, 2004; Braga et al., Dis Colon Rectum 48:217–223, 2005; Jayne et al., J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068, 2007; Agha et al., Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237, 2008).     

Per-oral dual scope NOTES cholecystectomy in porcine model (with video)

Background  

Several working groups have already demonstrated the feasibility of transgastric surgery procedures using flexible endoscopes. However, technical limitations in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (e.g., exposure, retraction, insufflations, and triangulation) currently still require the use of at least one external instrument [1–3]. Therefore, “pure NOTES” transgastric cholecystectomy has not yet been described. The authors successfully performed “pure NOTES” transgastric cholecystectomy using a transoral dual-scope technique (similar to the approach the authors previously reported for gastric closure [4]) that allows completion of the procedure by pure NOTES without an external instrument.     

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection from a phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal cancer: Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Lap RC

Background

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap ISR) is not yet an established technique and its safety and feasibility are unclear. Our aim was to clarify the safety and feasibility of Lap ISR for clinical stage 0/I rectal cancer (Lap RC) in a prospective multicenter study of laparoscopic surgery in Japan.

Methods

To examine the technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, we conducted a confirmatory phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for preoperative clinical stage 0/I rectal cancer. Eligibility criteria included histologically proven carcinoma, size?≤?8?cm, age 20–75?years, no bowel obstruction, and no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Between February 2008 and September 2010, 495 patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery at 43 institutions. Patients’ background characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded prospectively.

Results

Seventy-seven patients (15.6?%) underwent Lap ISR. A diverting stoma was created in 69 patients (89.6?%). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 4 patients (5.2?%): 2 patients were converted because of uncontrollable bleeding, and the other 2 patients because of the need for pelvic side wall lymphadenectomy. There was no mortality. Median operative time was 345?min (range?=?198–565), median amount of blood loss was 100?ml (range?=?0–1760), and three patients (3.9?%) were transfused intraoperatively. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 14 (range?=?3–33), and all (proximal, distal, and vertical) pathological cut margins were negative. Postoperative complications of grade 2 or more were detected in 17 patients (22.1?%), including anastomotic leakage in 5 (6.4?%), bowel obstruction in 5 (6.5?%), and surgical site infection in 2 (2.6?%). Abdominal drainage and diverting stoma were necessary in two patients (2.6?%) due to anastomotic leakage. Median length of postoperative hospital stay was 13?days (range?=?7–167).

Conclusion

Lap ISR was feasible and safe for clinical stage 0/I rectal cancer with favorable short-term outcome.     

Full‐thickness neorectal prolapse after transanal transabdominal proctosigmoidectomy for low rectal cancer: a cohort study

Aim

Transanal transabdominal proctosigmoidectomy (TATA) with a coloanal anastomosis is an alternative to abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APR) for low rectal cancer. Neorectal prolapse is an unusual complication following TATA. This study aimed to determine the incidence of neorectal prolapse after TATA for low rectal cancer.

Method

This cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral colorectal centre. From a prospectively maintained database including 1093 patients treated for rectal cancer between 1984 and 2016 we identified those who underwent sphincter‐preserving surgery. Data regarding the incidence, management and outcomes of neorectal prolapse were analysed.

Results

A total of 409 patients were identified, of whom 185 underwent open surgery and 224 a minimally invasive surgical procedure (MIS). All received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Neorectal prolapse occurred in 4.6% (n = 19) with an incidence of 2.2% in the open and 6.7% in the MIS group (P = 0.023), with no difference between MIS techniques. There was one recurrence of neorectal prolapse (5.9%). The incidence of neorectal prolapse was higher in women (9.5%) than men (2.5%) (P = 0.011). There were no differences in local recurrence rates between the neorectal prolapse group (5.3%) and our population without prolapse (3.4%) (P = 0.79).

Conclusion

Neorectal prolapse is a rare occurrence following minimally invasive sphincter‐saving surgical procedures performed for rectal cancer. It appears to be more frequent in patients who undergo MIS procedures and in women.     

Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Case-Matched Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes

Purpose  

The aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes and surgical quality of robot-assisted (RAP) and laparoscopic (LAP) total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with low rectal cancer.