Surgical treatment of combined hepatic and pulmonary colorectal cancer metastases

Aims

Surgical resection of combined hepatic and pulmonary metastases remains controversial in light of limited supportive evidence. This study aimed to audit our initial experience with this aggressive surgical strategy.

Methods

Between 1997 and 2006 we assessed 19 patients with colorectal cancer metastases for combined liver and lung metastasectomy, of whom 16 patients underwent surgery. We retrospectively reviewed perioperative and survival data.

Results

Synchronous liver metastases were present in three out of 16 patients at time of diagnosis of the primary tumour, and one out of 16 patients had synchronous lung and liver metastases with the primary tumour. Of those 12 patients who developed metachronous metastases five patients developed liver metastases first, one patient developed pulmonary metastases first, and six patients developed synchronous liver and lung metastases. Thirty nine operations were performed on 16 patients. The median hospital stay was 5.5 (2–10) days for the pulmonary and 7 (1–23) days for the hepatic resections. There were no in-hospital deaths. Chemotherapy was given to five patients prior to metastasectomy and nine received adjuvant chemotherapy following metastasectomy. Median survival from diagnosis of metastatic disease was 44 months (8–87 months). Estimated 1-year survival from diagnosis of metastatic disease was 94%, estimated 5-year survival was 20%.

Conclusion

We believe an aggressive but selective surgical approach to combined hepatic and pulmonary colorectal metastases is justified by limited resource requirements and encouraging survival.     

Improved survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma

While hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma is accepted as effective in selected patients, resection of metastases to other solid organs has not gained wide acceptance. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 49 patients who had resection of isolated pulmonary (18 patients) and hepatic (31 patients) metastases from the large bowel, comparing disease-free survival and overall survival. Tumor parameters analyzed included Dukes' stage, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) flow cytometry, and number of metastases. Dukes' B and diploid tumors had longer disease-free survival and overall survival than did Dukes' C and aneuploid tumors, though the difference was not significant. Patients with a single lung metastasis had a significantly longer disease-free survival (P = .02) than did patients with multiple metastases. Mean and median survival were longer in patients with lung metastases. Five-year actuarial survival was 19% for patients with liver metastases and 47% for patients with lung metastases. Resection of isolated pulmonary metastases from the large intestine results in survival comparable to or better than resection of hepatic metastases. An aggressive surgical approach is warranted in patients with isolated resectable pulmonary metastases of colorectal carcinoma.     

Survival Outcomes of Liver Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer Cases: A Single-Center Analysis in Turkey

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze our series of liver resections for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) to determine prognostic factors affecting survival and to evaluate the potential roles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent metastasectomy for liver metastases due to colorectal cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, 9 Eylul University Hospital between 1996 and 2010 were evaluated in this study. The patients were followed through July 2013. Demographic, perioperative, laboratory, radiological and chemotherapy as well as survival data were obtained by retrospective chart review. Results: In 47 (47.5%) patients, liver metastases were unresectable at initial evaluation; the remaining 52 (52.5%) patients exhibited resectable liver metastases. Simultaneous hepaticresection was applied to 52 (35.4%) patients with synchronous metastasis, whereas 5 (64.5%) patients underwent hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-two patients with metachronous metastasis underwenthepatic resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection was obtained in 79 (79.8%) patients. A second hepatectomy was performed in 22 (23.2%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 85 (85.9%) patients after metastasectomy. The median disease-free and overall survivals after initial metastasectomy were 12 and 37 months, respectively, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates being 46.5%, 24.3% and 17.9%and 92.3%, 59.0% and 39.0%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the primary tumor site, tumor differentiation, resection margin and DFS were independent factors predicting better overall survival. Conclusions: In selected cases, hepatic metastasectomy for mCRC to the liver can result in long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not exert a positive effect on DFS or OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy also did not appear to impact DFS and OS.     

Adrenalectomy for solitary adrenal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with adrenal metastases from lung cancer (non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC) remains controversial. Several studies of adrenalectomy in cases of isolated adrenal metastases from NSCLC suggest that these patients could have improved survival. Our aim is to define the history of patients after resection of solitary metastases to the adrenal gland and to identify characteristics of patients who achieved prolonged survival. METHODS: Between January 1997 and July 2000, 11 patients underwent curative resection for metastatic NSCLC of the adrenal gland in our institution. In all patients who were accepted for curative adrenalectomy, the primary NSCLC had been treated by complete resection. RESULTS: Eleven patients (seven men and four women) with unilateral adrenal metastases of NSCLC entered the study. Median age was 59 years (range 47-67 years). There was no perioperative death. The overall median survival after metastasectomy was 12.6 months (CI: 9.2-16.1 months). Patients with curative resection and metachronous disease (n=6) had a median survival of 30.9 months and tended to do better than patients with synchronous adrenal metastases (n=5) (median survival: 10.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that adrenalectomy for clinically solitary, resectable metastases can be performed safely. It appears reasonable that such selected patients should be considered surgical candidates.     

Lung Metastatectomy: Can Laser-Assisted Surgery Make a Difference?

Background: Resection of lung metastases with curative intention in selected patients is associated with prolonged survival. Laser–assisted resection of lung metastases results in complete resection of a high number of lung metastases, while preserving lung parenchyma. However, data concerning laser lung resections are scarce and contradictory. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the utility of laser-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy. Methods: An electronic search in MEDLINE (via PubMed), complemented by manual searches in article references, was conducted to identify eligible studies. Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 1196 patients were included in this metanalysis. Laser-assisted surgery (LAS) for lung metastases is a safe procedure with a postoperative morbidity up to 24.2% and almost zero mortality. LAS resulted in the resection of a high number of lung metastases with reduction of the lung parenchyma loss in comparison with conventional resection methods. Survival was similar between LAS and conventional resections. Conclusion: LAS allows radical lung-parenchyma saving resection of a high number of lung metastases with similar survival to conventional methods.     

Metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing curatively intended treatment

BackgroundThe main cause of mortality in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is metastatic progression. The aim of the present study was to describe frequency, pattern and outcome of metastatic disease in a cohort of LARC patients after curative resection.MethodsThis was a single-centre cohort study of 628 LARC cases after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (CRT/RT) and surgery. Data, including the first site of metastasis, was registered in an institutional database linked to the National Cancer Registry.ResultsMetastases were diagnosed in 270 patients (43.0%) with liver and lungs as the first site in 113 and 96 cases, respectively. Involved resection margins, high tumour stage and poor response to CRT/RT were associated with metastasis development and inferior overall survival (OS). Metastasectomy was performed in 76 (67.3%) patients with liver metastases and 28 (29.2%) patients with lung metastases. Five-year OS was 89% in patients without metastases and 32% in metastatic cases. In patients selected for metastasectomy, 5-year OS was 69% and 53% for lung and liver metastases, respectively. Corresponding numbers without metastasectomy were 12% and 0%.ConclusionIn this large LARC cohort undergoing curatively intended treatment, liver and lung metastases occurred at similar frequencies. Liver as the first metastatic site was associated with inferior long-term outcome, while selection for metastasectomy was associated with better OS, with more than half of the resected patients being alive five years after LARC surgery. Our results show that the presence of resectable metastatic disease at diagnosis should not exclude a curative therapeutic approach in LARC.     

宫颈癌肺转移患者手术治疗效果及预后因素分析

目的:通过对宫颈癌治疗后肺转移患者临床资料进行分析,评价外科手术治疗宫颈癌肺转移的疗效,研究影响患者生存的预后因素.方法:回顾性分析44例宫颈癌治疗后肺转移患者临床资料(手术组23例,对照组21例),采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,Log-rank检验进行单因素分析,COX风险回归模型进行多因素分析.结果:手术组1、2年生存率分别为78.2%、34.7%.手术组患者的生存曲线高于非手术组患者的生存曲线,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),单因素分析显示,肿瘤分化程度、肺转移瘤数目、肺转移性肿瘤最大直径与患者生存率有关(P<0.05);COX比例风险回归模型分析显示,肺转移瘤数目及肺转移肿瘤最大直径是宫颈癌肺转移患者预后的独立影响因素(P<0.05).结论:对于肺转移灶数目较少,直径较小的患者,可从肺转移灶切除中获益,积极行肺转移瘤外科治疗有助于改善宫颈癌肺转移患者的长期预后.     

Liver resection for metastatic gastric cancer: experience with 42 patients including eight long-term survivors

BACKGROUND: The indication for liver resection for gastric metastases remains controversial and few previous studies have reported the outcome of surgery in the treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to clarify the effectiveness of surgical resection for liver metastases arising from gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of 42 consecutive patients with synchronous (n = 20) or metachronous (n = 22) gastric liver metastases that were curatively resected. RESULTS: The overall 1, 3 and 5 year survival rates after hepatic resection were 76, 48 and 42%, respectively, and the median survival was 34 months. Univariate analysis revealed that survival significantly differed between cases of solitary and multiple metastases (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that solitary liver metastasis and the absence of serosal invasion by primary gastric cancer were favorable independent prognostic factors (P = 0.005 and P = 0.02, respectively). All eight patients who survived for more than 5 years after initial hepatectomy had a solitary metastasis, and six of these had no serosal invasion by the primary gastric cancer. No patient with multiple metastatic diseases survived beyond 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a solitary liver metastasis are good candidates for surgical resection, whereas those with multiple gastric liver metastases should be treated by multimodal approaches.     

Completion pneumonectomy for lung metastases

OBJECTIVE: Completion pneumonectomy (CP) for malignant disease is generally accepted but controversial for lung metastases. The data available show a high perioperative morbidity and mortality with a poor long-term prognosis. We analysed the postoperative outcome and long-term results of our patients undergoing CP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1986 and May 2003, nine patients underwent completion pneumonectomy for lung metastases. This represents 10% (9/86) of all CPs performed and 1.7% (9/525) of all pneumonectomies. RESULTS: One to three metastasectomies in the form of wedge resection (16), segment resection (5) and lobectomies (3) were performed prior to CP. The mean time interval between the operation of the primary tumour and the first metastasectomy was 38 months, the first and second metastasectomy 12 months, the second and third metastasectomy 14 months, and the third metastasectomy and CP 25 months. Six patients had an extended completion pneumonectomy. Operative morbidity and mortality was 0%. One patient is still alive and recurrence-free 9 months after CP. Two patients have recurrent pulmonary contralateral metastases under chemotherapy and six patients died of metastatic disease. Actual survival is 33%, recurrence-free survival (RFS) is 11%. The 3-year survival is 34%. CONCLUSION: Since there was no morbidity and mortality in our series, CP for lung metastases seems to be justified but the long-term survival is limited by the occurrence of contralateral or extrapulmonary metastatic disease. Multiple resections of metastases have a positive influence on survival, but the last step of resection in the form of CP does not seem to improve long-term survival.     

Survival after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: Importance of previous liver metastasis as a prognostic factor

Aims

To analyse patient survival after the resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma and specifically to verify whether presence of liver metastasis prior to lung metastasectomy affects survival.

Methods

All patients who, between 1998 and 2008, underwent lung metastasectomy due to colorectal cancer were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with the log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis.

Results

During this period, 101 metastasectomies were performed on 84 patients. The median age of patients was 65.4 years, and 60% of patients were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 2%, and incidence of complications was 7%. The overall survival was 72 months, with 3-and 5-year survival rates of 70% and 54%, respectively. A total of 17 patients (20%) had previously undergone resection of liver metastasis. No significant differences were found in the distribution of what were supposed to be the main variables between patients with and without previous hepatic metastases. Multivariate analysis identified the following statistically significant factors affecting survival: previous liver metastasectomy (p = 0.03), tumour-infiltrated pulmonary lymph nodes (p = 0.04), disease-free interval ≥ 48 months (p = 0.03), and presence of more than one lung metastasis (p < 0.01). In patients with previous liver metastasis, the shorter the time between primary colorectal surgery and the hepatectomy, the lower the survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.048).

Conclusions

A previous history of liver metastasis shortens survival after lung metastasectomy. The time between hepatic resection and lung metastasectomy does not affect survival; however, patients with synchronous liver metastasis and colorectal neoplasia have poorer survival rates than those with metachronous disease.     

Metastasectomy of Combined Liver and Lung Colorectal Cancer Metastases

The liver is the exclusive site of metastasis in approximately 30% to 50% of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, whereas lung metastasis occurs in 10% to 20% of patients. No single study has specifically addressed the predictors of survival after resection of synchronously diagnosed lung and liver metastases. Patients who undergo metastasectomy for simultaneous lung and liver metastases have a reported 5-year survival rate of approximately 40%. The prognostic significance of simultaneous presentation of lung and liver metastases (versus temporally separated presentations) is unclear. Other proposed predictors include short disease-free interval, patient age, and lung as first metastatic site. A paucity of data has led to a clinically driven treatment approach that recognizes the survival benefit for complete resection of disease, particularly when disease responds to systemic chemotherapy. Simultaneous or sequential resection of liver then lung metastases enables good long-term survival.     

Metachronous hepatic resection for liver only pancreatic metastases

BackgroundThe value of liver resection (LR) for metachronous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) metastases remains controversial. However, in light of increasing safety of liver resections, surgery might be a valuable option for metastasized PDAC in selected patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, multicenter study including patients undergoing hepatectomy for metachronous PDAC liver metastases between 2004 and 2015 to analyze postoperative outcome and overall survival. All patients were operated with curative intent. Patients with oligometastatic metachronous liver metastasis with definitive chemotherapy (n = 8) served as controls.ResultsOverall 25 patients in seven centers were included in this study. The median age at the time of LR was 63.8 years (56.9–69.9) and the median number of metastases in the liver was 1 (IQR 1–2). There were eight non-anatomical resections (32%), 15 anatomical minor (60%) and 2 major LR (8%). Postoperative complications occurred in eleven patients (eight Clavien-Dindo grade I complications (32%) and three grade IIIa complications (12%), respectively). The 30-day mortality was 0%. The median length of stay was 8.6 days (IQR 5–11). Median overall survival following LR was 36.8 months compared to 9.2 months in patients with metachronous liver metastasis with chemotherapy (p = 0007).DiscussionLiver resection for metachronous PDAC metastasis is safe and feasible in selected patients. To address general applicability and to find factors for patient selection, larger trials are urgently warranted.     

Combined liver and inferior vena cava resection for hepatic malignancy

OBJECTIVE: The experience from a single center, in combined liver and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection for liver tumors, is presented. METHODS: Twelve patients underwent a combined liver resection with IVC replacement. The median age was 45 years (range 35-67 years). Resections were carried out for hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4), colorectal metastases (n = 6), and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2). Liver resections included eight right lobectomies and four left trisegmentectomies. The IVC was reconstructed with ringed Gore-Tex tube graft. RESULTS: No perioperative deaths were reported. The median operative blood transfusion requirement was 2 units (range 0-12 units) and the median operative time was 5 hr. Median hospital stay was 10 days (range 8-25 days). Three patients had evidence of postoperative liver failure, resolved with supportive management. Two patients developed bile leaks, resolved conservatively. With a median follow up of 24 months, all vascular reconstructions were patent and no evidence of graft infection was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive surgical management of liver tumors, offer the only hope for cure or palliation. We suggest that liver resection with vena cava replacement may be performed safely, with acceptable morbidity, by specialized surgical teams.     

Colorectal cancer and thoracic surgeons: close encounters of the third kind

Resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly performed with a curative intent. This strategy was made possible in the 1990s by the development of new chemotherapeutic approaches, improved surgical techniques and better imaging modalities. However, evidence-based data showing clinical benefits of lung metastasectomy in this setting are nonexistent, and there are no prospective randomized trials to support the routine performance of these procedures for stage IV CRC. Current evidence suggests that resection of pulmonary metastases in combination with new cytotoxic agents, such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan and bevacizumab, may result in prolonged survival for many, and cure for a small minority of CRC patients who experienced tumor spread beyond the limits of the abdomen. This review focuses on the results of surgical management of CRC patients with lung metastases: we report the outcome of published series according to the presence or the absence of liver metastasis (and hepatic resection) prior to lung resection.     

Hepatic metastasectomy in children

BACKGROUND: There are little data regarding the safety and efficacy of hepatic metastasectomy for solid tumors in childhood. We reviewed our institutional experience to assess operative mortality and morbidity, technique of resection, local control, and survival in pediatric patients undergoing liver resection for metastases. METHODS: All pediatric patients who underwent hepatic resection for metastatic disease from August 1988 to July 2005 were retrospectively identified and clinical data were collected. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified during this period and primary malignancies included neuroblastoma (7), Wilms tumor (3), osteogenic sarcoma (2), malignant gastric epithelial tumor (1), and desmoplastic small round cell tumor (2). Twelve patients underwent anatomical hepatic resections and 3 had wedge resections. There were no intraoperative or postoperative deaths. The 2 postoperative complications included 1 wound infection and 1 bile collection. The median follow-up after hepatic resection was 1.6 years (0.2-7 years). Three patients remain alive. Eleven patients died of progressive disease; 4 patients suffered local recurrence. One patient died from enterocolitis and sepsis and was without evidence of malignancy at the time of death. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic metastasectomy in children is feasible and is associated with a low operative mortality and morbidity. In this small group of patients anatomic hepatectomy was associated with better local control compared with wedge resection. Overall prognosis in these patients remains poor and the decision to perform hepatic metastasectomy should be highly selective.     

Selected benefits of thoracotomy and chemotherapy for sarcoma metastatic to the lung

To determine the benefit of aggressive surgical therapy, we studied 77 consecutive patients presenting to our sarcoma registry with pulmonary metastases. Detailed follow-up was available on all patients; the median follow-up of the 13 long-term survivors was 72 months from the date of diagnosis of the primary tumor. Survival of these 77 patients with metastatic disease was independent of the size, location, and histology of the primary tumor. Once metastases developed, survival of patients with pulmonary metastases was not influenced by the extent of surgical resection of the primary tumor or by the use of radiation therapy. Pulmonary metastases were initially treated with thoracotomy and metastasectomy in 34 patients. The median survival after thoracotomy was 26 months. Seven patients were alive more than 4 years after their diagnosis. Pulmonary metastases were treated with chemotherapy alone in 43 patients. Although the survival was shorter (median survival 14 months) in patients treated with chemotherapy, an objective response to chemotherapy was obtained in 13 (30%) patients. Four of these patients were alive 4 years after their diagnosis. These data demonstrate that both thoracotomy and chemotherapy are associated with long-term survival of patients with sarcoma metastatic to the lung. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Prognostic factors in primary and iterative surgery of colorectal liver metastases

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgery of colorectal liver metastases and assess prognostic factors influencing the outcome. A total of 135 hepatic resections performed in 107 patients was reviewed. The following prognostic factors were analyzed: primary tumor localization, Dukes stage, number and presence of metastases in one or two lobes, synchronous or metachronous occurrence, type of resection, use and modality of chemotherapy. The perioperative morbidity rate was 6.5% and mortality was 1.9%. Overall survival was 41.2% and disease-free survival 31.5% at 5 years. Survival at 5 years was better for patients with metachronous than for those with synchronous lesions (60.9% vs 28.1%; p<0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of long-term survival between patients with synchronous metastases that were excised simultaneously or with a delay of 3-6 months (p=n.s.). Site of the primary tumor, Dukes stage, number of metastases and type of resection did not influence survival. A favorable survival trend was observed in those patients who underwent both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 45.3% for patients undergoing a second hepatic resection and 50% for those with a third or a fourth hepatic resection. Liver resection remains the "gold standard" for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases, with metachronous type having a better outcome than synchronous. Simultaneous or delayed surgery for synchronous metastases does not influence prognosis. Iterative resection is very encouraging and justifies an aggressive surgical approach.     

Survival after complete surgical resection of multiple metastases from renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Although a role for resection of solitary metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been described, the utility of surgery in patients with multiple sites of disease has been less well defined. The authors report the survival of patients who underwent complete metastasectomy for multiple RCC metastases.

METHODS:

The authors identified 887 patients who underwent nephrectomy for RCC between 1976 and 2006 who developed multiple metastatic lesions. The impact of complete metastasectomy on survival was evaluated controlling for the timing, location, and number of metastases and for patient performance status.

RESULTS:

Of 887 patients, 125 (14%) underwent complete surgical resection of all metastases. Complete metastasectomy was associated with a significant prolongation of median cancer‐specific survival (CSS) (4.8 years vs 1.3 years; P < .001). Patients who had lung‐only metastases had a 5‐year CSS rate of 73.6% with complete resection versus 19% without complete resection (P < .001). A survival advantage from complete metastasectomy also was observed among patients with multiple, nonlung‐only metastases, who had a 5‐year CSS rate of 32.5% with complete resection versus 12.4% without complete resection (P < .001). Complete resection remained predictive of improved CSS for patients who had ≥3 metastatic lesions (P < .001) and for patients who had synchronous (P < .001) and asynchronous (P = .002) multiple metastases. Moreover, on multivariate analysis, the absence of complete metastasectomy was associated significantly with an increased risk of death from RCC (hazard ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.17‐3.90; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that complete resection of multiple RCC metastases may be associated with long‐term survival and should be considered when technically feasible in appropriate surgical candidates. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Metastasectomy as a cytoreductive strategy for treatment of isolated pulmonary and hepatic metastases from breast cancer

The authors sought to examine the utility of resection in conjunction with adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of metastases from breast cancer isolated to the liver or lungs. Limitations of regional therapy were examined and potential agents for systemic therapy were reviewed. As resection of metastases is a controversial therapeutic approach, no clinical trials are available for review. Rather, evidence for a potential role for surgery rests on retrospective studies of small series of patients. Technical advances have rendered resection of liver and lung metastases safe. Long-term results as reported by other investigators support the role of metastasectomy in selected patients. The site of failure following ablation of liver metastases is usually in the liver. Following resection of lung metastases, nonpulmonary and disseminated recurrences are most common. Adjuvant therapy with docetaxel or any other agent or combination with significant activity against visceral metastases might potentiate long-term results.     

Lung metastasectomy in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of salivary gland

To define the role of surgical management of lung metastases in ACC. Twenty ACC patients referred to lung metastasectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-six operations were performed; at the first metastasectomy, a resection with clear margins (R0) was achieved in 11 patients (55%), 3 are alive and well. Four out of 9 patients with residual disease (R2) are still alive. Median survival after metastasectomy was 78 and 52 months for R0 and R2 (p=0.4); median freedom from progression (FFP) in R0 and R2 groups was 30 and 15 months (p=0.2), respectively. A better outcome was obtained for patients with a disease-free interval 36 months and 6 metastases and bilateral involvement were critical in achieving a R0 intervention. Lung metastasectomy provided a prolonged FFP in a high selected subset of patients with ACC. However, if this could be translated into a survival benefit, it is still to be demonstrated.