Comparative Efficacy of Aliskiren Monotherapy and Ramipril Monotherapy in Patients with Stage 2 Systolic Hypertension: Subgroup Analysis of a Double‐blind,Active Comparator Trial

Aliskiren is the first direct renin inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) control in stage 2 hypertension with aliskiren monotherapy has not been reported. This was a post hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension (baseline mean sitting systolic BP [msSBP]≥160 mmHg) who completed the 12‐week monotherapy phase of a 6‐month, double‐blind, randomized study. A total of 175 patients were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg (n = 88) or ramipril 5 mg (n = 87) with optional up‐titration to aliskiren 300 mg or ramipril 10 mg, respectively, at weeks 6 and 12. In the subgroup of patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension, aliskiren lowered msSBP and mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) by 22.3/12.7 mmHg from baseline to week 12; compared with a reduction of 18.1/10.2 mmHg with ramipril. The maximum BP reductions achieved with aliskiren were 60.0/34.0 mmHg (from a baseline of 172.7/107.3 mmHg). Aliskiren was noninferior (P < 0.0001) to ramipril for SBP reduction with nonsignificant superiority (P= 0.052), and superior (P= 0.043) to ramipril for DBP reduction. The proportion of patients who achieved BP control (<140/90 mmHg) after 12 weeks of monotherapy was larger with aliskiren (34/88, 38.6%) than with ramipril (22/87, 25.3%; P= 0.038). In this post hoc analysis, 12 weeks of monotherapy with aliskiren 150–300 mg provided effective mean BP reductions (22/13 mmHg) and was superior to ramipril 5–10 mg in controlling BP in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension.     

Efficacy and safety of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, compared with ramipril in Asian patients with mild to moderate hypertension

This 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of aliskiren with ramipril in Asian patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Following a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in period, patients with mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) ≥95 and <110 mm Hg were randomized to receive once daily dose of either aliskiren 75, 150, 300 mg or ramipril 5 mg for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables were the changes in msDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) and BP control rates (<140/90 mm Hg). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Of 1316 randomized patients, 1160 (88.1%) completed the study. At the study endpoint, patients on aliskiren had greater mean BP reductions (14.39/11.63 mm Hg for 300 mg; 12.16/10.04 mm Hg for 150 mg; 12.24/10.66 mm Hg for 75 mg) than those on 5 mg ramipril (11.46/9.19 mm Hg). All aliskiren doses were statistically non-inferior (P<0.0001) to ramipril in reducing msDBP. The reduction in BP for aliskiren 300 mg was statistically superior vs. ramipril (P<0.002). Blood pressure control rates were higher for aliskiren (300 mg, 52.29%; 150 mg, 48.11%; 75 mg, 45.68%) than for ramipril (5 mg, 43.7%); the difference for aliskiren 300 mg vs. ramipril 5 mg was statistically significant (P<0.05). Aliskiren was well tolerated with a fourfold lower incidence of cough (0.6-1.2%) compared with ramipril (5.2%). SAEs were rare in this study (0.5%). Aliskiren produced greater BP reductions with a lower incidence of cough than ramipril in Asian patients with mild to moderate hypertension.     

A comparison of the tolerability of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension

Patients with severe hypertension (>180/110 mm Hg) require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach recommended treatment goals (<140/90 mm Hg) and usually require combination therapy to do so. This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the tolerability and antihypertensive efficacy of the novel direct renin inhibitor aliskiren with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP)>or=105 mm Hg and <120 mm Hg). In all, 183 patients were randomized (2:1) to aliskiren 150 mg (n=125) or lisinopril 20 mg (n=58) with dose titration (to aliskiren 300 mg or lisinopril 40 mg) and subsequent addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) if additional BP control was required. Aliskiren-based treatment (ALI) was similar to lisinopril-based treatment (LIS) with respect to the proportion of patients reporting an adverse event (AE; ALI 32.8%; LIS 29.3%) or discontinuing treatment due to AEs (ALI 3.2%; LIS 3.4%). The most frequently reported AEs in both groups were headache, nasopharyngitis and dizziness. At end point, ALI showed similar mean reductions from baseline to LIS in msDBP (ALI -18.5 mm Hg vs LIS -20.1 mm Hg; mean treatment difference 1.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.0, 4.4)) and mean sitting systolic blood pressure (ALI -20.0 mm Hg vs LIS -22.3 mm Hg; mean treatment difference 2.8 mm Hg (95% CI -1.7, 7.4)). Responder rates (msDBP<90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline>or=10 mm Hg) were 81.5% with ALI and 87.9% with LIS. Approximately half of patients required the addition of HCTZ to achieve BP control (ALI 53.6%; LIS 44.8%). In conclusion, ALI alone, or in combination with HCTZ, exhibits similar tolerability and antihypertensive efficacy to LIS alone, or in combination with HCTZ, in patients with severe hypertension.     

Antihypertensive efficacy,safety, and tolerability of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in patients with hypertension: a pooled analysis

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren were assessed in a pooled analysis of data from seven randomized, multicenter studies. Data were available for 7,045 patients (mean age 52.5 to 59.8 years, 50.2 to 72.5% men) with mild-to-moderate hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [msDBP] 95 to 109 mm Hg) over treatment durations of 6 to 8 weeks. In placebo-controlled trials, aliskiren reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure/msDBP from baseline by 8.6 to 12.1/7.2 to 10.3 mm Hg (75 mg), 8.7 to 13.0/7.8 to 10.3 mm Hg (150 mg), 14.1 to 15.8/10.3 to 12.3 mm Hg (300 mg), and 15.7 to 15.8/11.5 to 12.5 mm Hg (600 mg), compared with 2.9 to 10.0/3.3 to 8.6 mm Hg for placebo. Aliskiren demonstrated comparable efficacy in men and women, in patients aged <65 years or ≥65 years, and lowered blood pressure (BP) effectively in all racial subgroups. Combination of aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg with ramipril, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide provided significant additional BP reductions compared with the respective monotherapies. The overall incidence of adverse events with aliskiren monotherapy was similar to placebo (39.8% vs. 40.2%, respectively). The incidence of diarrhea with aliskiren was higher than placebo due to a significantly higher rate with aliskiren 600 mg (P < .0001 vs. placebo). In conclusion, aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg provides highly effective and consistent BP lowering with placebo-like tolerability in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of aliskiren, an oral direct renin inhibitor, and ramipril in hypertension: a 6-month, randomized, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES: This double-blind study compared long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril alone and combined with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension. METHODS: After a 2-4-week placebo run-in, 842 patients [mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) 95-109 mmHg] were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg (n = 420) or ramipril 5 mg (n = 422). Dose titration (to aliskiren 300 mg/ramipril 10 mg) and subsequent hydrochlorothiazide addition (12.5 mg, titrated to 25 mg if required) were permitted at weeks 6, 12, 18 and 21 for inadequate blood pressure control. Patients completing the 26-week active-controlled treatment period were re-randomized to their existing regimen or placebo for a 4-week double-blind withdrawal phase. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty-seven patients (81.6%) completed the active treatment period. At week 26, aliskiren-based therapy produced greater mean reductions in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (17.9 versus 15.2 mmHg, P = 0.0036) and msDBP (13.2 versus 12.0 mmHg, P = 0.025), and higher rates of systolic blood pressure control (< 140 mmHg; 72.5 versus 64.1%, P = 0.0075) compared with ramipril-based therapy. During withdrawal, blood pressure increased more rapidly after stopping ramipril than aliskiren-based therapy; median blood pressure reached 140/90 mmHg after 1 and 4 weeks, respectively. Blood pressure reductions were maintained with continued active treatment. Aliskiren therapy was well tolerated. Overall adverse event rates were similar with aliskiren (61.3%) and ramipril (60.4%); cough was more frequent with ramipril (9.5%) than aliskiren (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Aliskiren-based therapy was well tolerated and produced sustained blood pressure reductions in patients with hypertension over 6 months, greater than those with ramipril-based therapy.     

Aliskiren, a novel oral renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in Japanese patients with hypertension.

Aliskiren is a novel orally active renin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension. This study evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren in Japanese patients with hypertension. Forty hundred and fifty-five Japanese men and women with a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95-110 mmHg were randomized to receive once-daily double-blind treatment for 8 weeks with aliskiren 75, 150 or 300 mg or placebo. Aliskiren produced significant, dose-dependent reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (p<0.0005 vs. placebo for each dose) and mean sitting systolic blood pressure (p<0.001 vs. placebo for each dose). The placebo-corrected reductions in mean sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure were 5.7/4.0, 5.9/4.5 and 11.2/7.5 mmHg in the aliskiren 75, 150 and 300 mg groups, respectively. After 8 weeks' treatment, 27.8%, 47.8%, 48.2% and 63.7% of patients in the placebo and aliskiren 75, 150 and 300 mg groups, respectively, achieved a successful treatment response (diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and/or reduced by > or =10 mmHg from baseline; p<0.005 vs. placebo for each dose). Aliskiren treatment was well tolerated, with the incidence of adverse events reported in the active treatment groups (53-55%) being similar to that in the placebo group (50%). This study, which is the first to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of aliskiren in Japanese patients with hypertension, demonstrates that the once-daily oral renin inhibitor aliskiren provides significant, dose-dependent reductions in blood pressure with placebo-like tolerability.     

Aliskiren-based dual- and triple-combination therapies in high-risk US minority patients with Stage 2 hypertension

Previously, we reported the efficacy of aliskiren/amlodipine in US minority adults with stage 2 hypertension, with additional blood pressure (BP) lowering from the addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). A subgroup analysis in patients with hypertension and comorbidities of diabetes, cardiometabolic syndrome, or obesity, and in black participants is reported. This 8-week, multicenter, double-blind study included 412 self-identified minority patients with mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) ≥160 mm Hg and <200 mm Hg). Patients were randomized to receive either combination aliskiren/amlodipine 150/5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Doses were forced-titrated to a maximum of aliskiren/amlodipine/HCTZ 300/10/25 mg or aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg, respectively. There were 256 black (62%), 118 diabetic (29%), 284 cardiometabolic syndrome (69%), and 249 obese (60%) randomized patients. Baseline msSBP was ～167 mm Hg across all subgroups. Least-square mean reductions in msSBP, the primary efficacy outcome, from baseline to week 8 across all subgroups, ranged from 35 to 37 mm Hg with aliskiren/amlodipine/HCTZ and 28 to 30 mm Hg with aliskiren/amlodipine (P < .01 for all between-treatment comparisons). Both regimens were well tolerated. Among high-risk patients, such as diabetics or those with cardiometabolic syndrome, combination aliskiren/amlodipine is effective in lowering BP; the addition of HCTZ provided incremental BP-lowering efficacy while maintaining tolerability. However, because our subgroups were not mutually exclusive, the generalization of our findings to the population seen in clinical practice is limited.     

Pulse pressure lowering effect of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril vs. high-dose ACE inhibition in hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects: a CALM II study post-hoc analysis

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP) is strongly associated with micro- and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetic patients. We examined the effect of 12 months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril vs. high-dose lisinopril monotherapy on ambulatory PP in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients from the CALM (Candesartan and Lisinopril Microalbuminuria Trial) II study. METHODS: The CALM II study was a 12-month prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-masked study that included 75 type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects with hypertension. Participants were randomized for treatment with either high-dose lisinopril (40 mg once daily (o.d.)) or for dual blockade treatment with candesartan (16 mg o.d.) and lisinopril (20 mg o.d.). In this article, we present data from the post-hoc subgroup of 51 type 2 diabetic subjects who completed the full 12-month study period with successful ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements at both baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Baseline 24-h BP values were similar in the two groups (24-h systolic BP (SBP) 130 +/- 12 vs. 127 +/- 9, 24-h diastolic BP (DBP) 77 +/- 8 vs. 74 +/- 7, and 24-h PP 53 +/- 8 vs. 53 +/- 7 mm Hg, for the lisinopril and dual blockade groups, respectively, P > 0.2 for all). Compared with lisinopril monotherapy, dual blockade treatment caused a highly significant reduction in 24-h PP levels (-5 +/- 5 mm Hg, P = 0.003), albeit the difference in the BP lowering effect between the treatment groups did not differ significantly for 24-h systolic (P = 0.21) or diastolic (P = 0.49) BP. Dual blockade treatment significantly lowered 24-h SBP (-5 +/- 11 mm Hg, P = 0.03), but not 24-h DBP (-2 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.29), whereas in the lisinopril group, the opposite effect was observed (24-h SBP -1 +/- 9 mm Hg, P = 0.45, 24-h SBP -3 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril significantly reduced PP when compared with high-dose monotherapy with lisinopril. Larger studies are needed to confirm this observation, and to evaluate whether this effect translates into a greater degree of end-organ protection from dual blockade treatment than from conventional angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition.     

Comparison of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with stage 2 hypertension and diabetes are at high cardiovascular risk and require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach treatment goals. This randomized double-blind study compared aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy with amlodipine monotherapy in 860 patients with mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) ≥160 mm Hg to <200 mm Hg and type 2 diabetes. Patients received either once-daily aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week then force-titrated to double the doses for 7 weeks. Baseline BP was 167.7/91.4 mm Hg. At week 8 end point, aliskiren/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions in msSBP than amlodipine (28.8 mm Hg vs 26.2 mm Hg; P<.05). Mean sitting diastolic BP reductions were similar with aliskiren/HCTZ (9.9 mm Hg) and amlodipine (9.0 mm Hg). Achievement of BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) was significantly greater with aliskiren/HCTZ (23.2%) than amlodipine (13.8%; P<.0001). Aliskiren/HCTZ provides substantial msSBP reductions and greater BP control rates than amlodipine, and offers an attractive treatment option for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension

Initial multiple drug therapy for hypertension achieves greater and quicker reductions and higher blood pressure (BP) control rates than monotherapy. This 8-week, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of the initial combination of aliskiren/amlodipine with amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension. After a 1- to 4-week washout, patients received aliskiren/amlodipine 150/5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week and then were force-titrated to aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 7 weeks. At week 8, greater reductions in mean sitting systolic BP were obtained with aliskiren/amlodipine (n = 220) than with amlodipine (n = 223) (least squares mean change [standard error of the mean], -34.1 [1.14] mm Hg vs -28.9 [1.12] mm Hg; P<.001). Ambulatory and central BP measures were consistent with clinic BP findings, although these were conducted in a small subset of patients (n = 94 in ambulatory BP monitoring substudy and n = 136 for central BP). More patients achieved goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg) with aliskiren/amlodipine than with amlodipine at week 8 (57.3% vs 48.0%; P = .051). Both treatment groups had similar adverse event rates (35.0% and 32.7%, respectively). The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (7.7% with aliskiren/amlodipine and 9.0% with amlodipine), headache, fatigue, and nausea. The combination of aliskiren/amlodipine reduced peripheral, ambulatory, and central BP more than amlodipine alone with similar tolerability in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension.     

Peripheral and central blood pressure responses of combination aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine monotherapy in African American patients with stage 2 hypertension: the ATLAAST trial

Efficacy of antihypertensive agents on central blood pressure (BP) in African Americans is not well studied. The authors report on an 8-week double-blind, randomized study of African American patients with stage 2 hypertension that compared brachial and central BP responses (substudy of 53 patients) to combination aliskiren/hydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) and amlodipine monotherapy. Following a 1- to 4-week washout, initial therapy was aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg (n=166) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=166) for 1 week, forced-titrated to aliskiren/HCTZ 300/25 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 7 weeks. Mean seated systolic BP reductions from baseline was similar with both treatments (-28.6 mm Hg with aliskiren/HCTZ vs -28.2 mm Hg with amlodipine). In the substudy, significantly greater reductions in central systolic BP was observed with aliskiren/HCTZ vs amlodipine (-30.1 mm Hg vs -21.2; P=.031), although 24-hour mean ambulatory BP reductions between the two groups were similar. Central pressure is considered an important risk factor in African Americans, and these findings may suggest a new treatment option for these patients.     

Aliskiren, an oral renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent efficacy and sustained 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: This dose-ranging study evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of aliskiren in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. BACKGROUND: Low blood pressure (BP) control rates among patients with hypertension indicate a need for improved treatment options. This study investigates aliskiren, the first in a new antihypertensive class called renin inhibitors. METHODS: Patients with mean sitting diastolic BP 95 to 109 mm Hg were randomized to aliskiren 150, 300, or 600 mg or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. Patients completing this treatment phase entered a 2-week treatment-free withdrawal period. Office BP was recorded at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 of treatment, and 4 days and 2 weeks after cessation of treatment. A subgroup of patients underwent ambulatory BP monitoring. RESULTS: In total, 672 patients were randomized to treatment. After 8 weeks, aliskiren 150, 300, and 600 mg significantly reduced mean sitting BP (systolic/diastolic) by 13.0/10.3, 14.7/11.1, and 15.8/12.5 mm Hg, respectively, versus 3.8/4.9 mm Hg with placebo (all p < 0.0001 for systolic and diastolic BP). The BP-lowering effect of aliskiren persisted for up to 2 weeks after treatment withdrawal. Aliskiren significantly reduced mean 24-h ambulatory BP (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo with all doses) exhibiting smooth, sustained effects and high trough-to-peak ratios. Aliskiren was well tolerated; overall adverse event rates were 40.1%, 46.7%, and 52.4% with aliskiren 150, 300, and 600 mg, respectively, and 43.0% with placebo. Few patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Aliskiren provides significant antihypertensive efficacy in patients with hypertension, with no rebound effects on blood pressure after treatment withdrawal.     

The combination of vitamin C and grape-seed polyphenols increases blood pressure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that oxidative stress contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension and endothelial dysfunction. Thus, dietary antioxidants may beneficially influence blood pressure (BP) and endothelial function by reducing oxidative stress. OBJECTIVE: To determine if vitamin C and polyphenols, alone or in combination, can lower BP, improve endothelial function and reduce oxidative stress in hypertensive individuals. DESIGN: A total of 69 treated hypertensive individuals with a mean 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure > or = 125 mmHg participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial trial. Following a 3-week washout, participants received 500 mg/day vitamin C, 1000 mg/day grape-seed polyphenols, both vitamin C and polyphenols, or neither for 6 weeks. At baseline and post-intervention, 24-h ambulatory BP, ultrasound-assessed endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the brachial artery, and markers of oxidative damage, (plasma and urinary F2-isoprostanes, oxidized low-density lipoproteins and plasma tocopherols), were measured. RESULTS: A significant interaction between grape-seed and vitamin C treatments for effects on BP was observed. Vitamin C alone reduced systolic BP versus placebo (-1.8 +/- 0.8 mmHg, P = 0.03), while polyphenols did not (-1.3 +/- 0.8 mmHg, P = 0.12). However, treatment with the combination of vitamin C and polyphenols increased systolic BP (4.8 +/- 0.9 mmHg versus placebo; 6.6 +/- 0.8 mmHg versus vitamin C; 6.1 +/- 0.9 mmHg versus polyphenols mmHg, each P < 0.0001) and diastolic BP (2.7 +/- 0.6 mmHg, P < 0.0001 versus placebo; 1.5 +/- 0.6 mmHg, P = 0.016 versus vitamin C; 3.2 +/- 0.7 mmHg, P < 0.0001 versus polyphenols). Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation, and markers of oxidative damage were not significantly altered. CONCLUSION: Although the mechanism remains to be elucidated, these results suggest caution for hypertensive subjects taking supplements containing combinations of vitamin C and polyphenols.     

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly hypertension

We examined the effect and safety of combination therapy with low-dose diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide: HCTZ) and angiotensin II receptor antagonist (losartan) in elderly cases of hypertension, using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Elderly hypertensive patients (mean age 75 +/- 2 years) were treated with either losartan (25-50 mg/day) or HCTZ (12.5 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks, and then 24-hour blood pressure (BP) was measured by ABPM. Combination therapy with addition of other drug was initiated in 14 patients whose 24-hour systolic BP or daytime systolic BP was over 140 mmHg (160 mmHg for the patients of 80 years or older). After 4 weeks of the combination therapy, ABPM was repeated. Blood cell count and blood chemistry were also done before and after initiation of combination therapy. In the losartan-preceding group (n = 9), the combination therapy with HCTZ reduced 24-hour BP by 19.3 +/- 2.3/6.6 +/- 2.3 mmHg. Similarly, daytime and nighttime BP decreased by 21.4 +/- 4/8.4 +/- 2.8 mmHg and 15.2 +/- 4/4.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively. In the HCTZ-preceding group, the combination with losartan also decreased 24-hour BP by 12.2 +/- 4.8/3.4 +/- 1.4 mmHg. The decreases of daytime and nighttime BP were 13.8 +/- 6.6/4 +/- 1.1 mmHg and 10 +/- 4.7/3 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively. Heart rate did not change with combination therapy in the losartan-preceding group, while heart rate during daytime tended to decrease by addition of losartan in the HCTZ-preceding group (3.8 +/- 1.7/min). Serum electrolytes, uric acid, lipids, renal function and body weight did not change during the study period. Thus, combination therapy of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide seems useful in the treatment of elderly hypertension, showing additive BP lowering effect without metabolic adverse effects.     

Predictors of controlled ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients with uncontrolled office blood pressure.

Although some treated hypertensive patients have controlled 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) despite their uncontrolled office blood pressure (BP), the factors relating to the control of 24-h ABP remain unknown. We conducted a study to assess 24-h ABP and its association with other cardiovascular risk factors, including echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), in elderly hypertensive patients (n =41) with uncontrolled office BP (>140/90 mmHg) during long-term medication. Although a majority of the patients had isolated elevation of office systolic BP (SBP), there was no significant relationship between office SBP and 24-h SBP, and about half of the patients had controlled 24-h ABP (125+/-8/69+/-6 mmHg). Patients with controlled 24-h ABP (125+/-8/69+/-6 mmHg) had similar office BP (150+/-6/77+/-5 vs. 150+/-7/79+/-7 mmHg), but lower left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (123+/-34 vs. 156+/-34 g/m(2)) and body mass index (BMI) (24.4+/-2.1 vs. 26.4+/-3.6 kg/m(2)) compared with those with uncontrolled 24-h ABP (149+/-13/78+/-7 mmHg). Multivariate analysis showed that LVMI and BMI were independently associated with controlled 24-h ABP, and the control status of 24-h ABP was highly dependent on the presence of LVH and obesity. Therefore, absence of LVH and obesity may be useful for predicting the level of control of 24-h ABP in treated patients whose office BP is uncontrolled without ABP measurements.     

Nurse-recorded and ambulatory blood pressure predicts treatment-induced reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy equally well in hypertension: results from the Swedish irbesartan left ventricular hypertrophy investigation versus atenolol (SILVHIA) study

OBJECTIVE : To compare the relationships of treatment-induced reductions of left ventricular hypertrophy to the changes in clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP). DESIGN : Double-blind and randomized treatment with irbesartan or atenolol for 48 weeks. PATIENTS : Patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 66) with a seated diastolic BP 90-115 mmHg (average of three measurements one minute apart by nurses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Registrations of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass. Clinic and ambulatory BP. RESULTS : In the total material, nurse-measured BP was reduced by 23 +/- 15/16 +/- 7.7 mmHg and 24-h ambulatory BP fell 20 +/- 15/14 +/- 8.5 mmHg by treatment. The correlation between the change in nurse-measured BP and LV mass index (LVMI) induced by treatment was r = 0.35, P = 0.004 for systolic BP and r = 0.26, P = 0.03 for diastolic BP. Corresponding values for 24-h ambulatory BP were r = 0.29, P = 0.02 and r = 0.35, P = 0.004, respectively, with similar correlations for day- and night-time ambulatory BP. The nurse-recorded BP was slightly higher than ambulatory BP (systolic clinic - systolic 24-h ambulatory BP = 5 mmHg). Using 130/80 mmHg as a cut-off value for normal 24-h ambulatory BP, eight subjects had normal diastolic or systolic ambulatory BP, or both. Interestingly, these patients also experienced LVMI regression following treatment (low/normal ABP, -13 +/- 21 g/m2; remaining patients, -18 +/- 22 g/m2, P > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS : In patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, ambulatory BP is not superior to carefully standardized nurse-recorded seated BP in terms of associations with treatment-induced changes in LV mass.     

Chronobiological analysis by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of the hyperbaric and hypobaric indexes for evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of long-acting nifedipine.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that chronobiology can provide new insights into the evaluation and treatment of cardiovascular disease. In the present study the hyperbaric index (hyperBI) and hypobaric index (hypoBI) were compared with the mean blood pressure (BP) over 24 h to evaluate the antihypertensive effect of long-acting nifedipine on essential hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated with nifedipine CR (20-40 mg/day) for 6 months. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed before and after treatment. The hyperBI (mmHg . h/day) was calculated as the integrated BP area above the conventional upper limit (140/90 mmHg for the daytime and 120/80 mmHg at night), and the hypoBI was calculated as the integrated BP area below the conventional lower limit (110/60 mmHg for the daytime and 100/50 mmHg at night). At baseline, both the systolic and diastolic 24-h hyperBI values closely correlated with the 24-h mean BP (r=0.994 and 0.935, p<0.0001). Treatment with nifedipine significantly lowered both the 24-h mean systolic and diastolic BP (143+/-14/89 +/-12 to 124+/-16/80+/-8 mmHg, p<0.001/p=0.001), as well as the casual BP (167+/-11/101 +/-8 to 140+/-13/86+/-10 mmHg, p<0.001/p<0.01). Reduction of both the systolic and diastolic hyperBI values was statistically significant over the 24-h period (274+/-266 to 90+/-155, p=0.009; 145+/-187 to 41+/-63, p=0.024), as well as during the daytime (200+/-181 to 66+/-116, p=0.014; 105+/-120 to 24+/-38, p=0.017) and at night (systolic, 74+/-106 to 24+/-52, p=0.021). The 24-h mean BP was normalized, but a small excess BP load persisted despite treatment. There was no significant increase of systolic hypoBI during the 24-h period (1+/-2 to 25+/-30, p=0.065), the daytime (0+/-0 to 14+/-38, p=0.20), or at night (1+/-3 to 11+/-19, p=0,052). Similar findings were obtained for diastolic hypoBI. CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine CR improved the 24-h hyperBI and mean BP without causing excessive hypotension. These 2 parameters have a close relationship when assessment is done by 24-h BP monitoring. The hyperBI and hypoBI may assist in providing adequate antihypertensive therapy for individual patients by detecting an excessive BP load or hypotension, respectively.     

Efficacy of once-daily lisinopril monotherapy in systemic hypertension

Lisinopril is a new, long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor formulated for once-daily treatment of hypertension. This study assessed the 24-h efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril in Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension of World Health Organization Stages I to II. A total of 30 patients aged 30 to 60 years (mean 47 ± 9) entered a 2-week washout period. All patients had ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (BP) > 90 mmHg and were given active treatment with lisinopril for 4 to 7 weeks. The dose of lisinopril was titrated from 10 to 40 mg daily (at 8-9 A. M.). In each patient, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (SpaceLabs 90202) was performed twice, once before and once following treatment. Mean 24-hour systolic/diastolic BPs after lisinopril were significantly decreased compared with baseline values (132 ± 12/86 ± 7 vs. 150 ± 11/98 ± 7 mmHg; p < 0.0005/ 0.0005). The average dose of lisinopril was 14.5 ± 5 mg daily after a titration period of 5 weeks of treatment. Mean daytime (6 A. M. to 6 P. M.) BP decreased from 152 ± 11/100 ± 8 to 134 ± 12/87 ± 8 mmHg (p < 0.0005/0.0005) and nighttime (6 P.M. to 6 A. M.) BP from 147 ± 14/95 ± 9 to 128 ± 14/83 ± 8 mmHg ( p < 0.0005/0.0005). BP reduction was more pronounced during the night. Before treatment, the circadian variation showed a peak BP at 11 A. M. and nadir at 3 P. M. After treatment, significant BP reduction (p < 0.0005/0.0005) was seen throughout the 24-h period. The circadian rhythm of BP was preserved as indicated by similar BP standard deviations (14 ± 3/11 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 3/10 ± 2 mmHg). Mean heart rate increased from 76 to 80 beats/min (p < 0.05). Four patients reported having a nonproductive cough. Thus, lisinopril administered as once-daily monotherapy provided effective BP control over a 24-h period with preserved circadian rhythm.     

Hypotensive effects of a calcium antagonist, bepridil, in patients with essential hypertension

The short and long term hypotensive effects of oral administration of bepridil were investigated in 26 patients with essential hypertension. A new calcium antagonist, bepridil inhibits the ion influx through sodium and potassium channels as well as calcium channels by directly affecting these channels. The drug (150 mg) rapidly decreased blood pressure (BP) from 157 +/- 12/97 +/- 8 to 137 +/- 10/86 +/- 8 mmHg (mean +/- SD, p less than 0.01) and heart rate (HR) from 64 +/- 5 to 58 +/- 4 beats/min (p less than 0.01) (n = 6) in 2 hours. Long term administration of 150 mg bepridil daily (50 mg t.d.s.) decreased BP from 169 +/- 6/104 +/- 8 to 143 +/- 14/83 +/- 7 mmHg (p less than 0.001), but did not change HR (66 +/- 4 and 67 +/- 5 beats/min, before and after administration) (n = 9). Bepridil at 300 mg (100 mg t.d.s.) decreased BP from 172 +/- 15/105 +/- 8 to 146 +/- 11/88 +/- 4 mmHg (p less than 0.001) and HR from 76 +/- 11 to 70 +/- 8 beats/min (p less than 0.01) (n = 9). No side effects were observed. In conclusion, the hypotensive and negative chronotropic actions of bepridil are beneficial in the short and long term treatment of essential hypertension.     

Aliskiren reduces blood pressure and suppresses plasma renin activity in combination with a thiazide diuretic, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or an angiotensin receptor blocker

Thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers all cause reactive rises in plasma renin activity. We hypothesized that renin inhibition with aliskiren would prevent this reactive rise and also enhance blood pressure lowering. In 3 open-label studies in which blood pressure was assessed with ambulatory measurement, aliskiren was administered to patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (n=23), ramipril (n=21), or irbesartan (n=23). In the diuretic combination study, the addition of 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide to 150 mg of aliskiren daily for 3 weeks significantly lowered daytime pressure, compared with aliskiren monotherapy (systolic/diastolic mean change from baseline [SEM]: daytime: -18.4 [2.1]/ -10.6 [1.7] versus -10.4 [1.8]/-5.8 [1.4]; nighttime: -15.6 [2.7]/-8.1 [1.8] versus -8.8 [2.9]/-5.0 [2.2]). In the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination study, the addition of 75 or 150 mg of aliskiren to 5 mg of ramipril alone for 3 weeks further lowered both daytime and nighttime pressures compared with ramipril monotherapy (daytime: -10.5 [2.9]/-8.1 [2.1] and -14 [3.7]/-8.7 [2.3] versus -6.1 [2.4]/-5.9 [1.5]; nighttime: -8.1 [2.6]/-5.3 [2.4] and -9.6 [3.4]/-5.3 [2.4] versus -2 [2.3]/-0.7 [2.2]). In the angiotensin receptor blocker combination study, the addition of 75 or 150 mg of aliskiren to 150 mg of irbesartan alone, for 3 weeks, resulted in significantly lower nighttime pressures compared with irbesartan monotherapy (daytime: -14.8 [2]/-8.2 [1.3] and -13.3 [1.6]/-6.8 [0.9] versus -11.4 [1.6]/-6.5 [1.1]; nighttime: -16.1 [2.4]/-8.6 [1.7] and -13.2 [2.7]/-7.2 [1.9] versus -9.0 [2.5]/-4.7 [1.9]). Aliskiren (150 mg) alone significantly inhibited plasma renin activity by 65% (P<0.0001). Ramipril and irbesartan monotherapy caused 90% and 175% increases in plasma renin activity, respectively. By contrast, when aliskiren was coadministered with hydrochlorothiazide, ramipril, or irbesartan, plasma renin activity did not increase but remained similar to baseline levels or was decreased (combination therapy versus untreated; median [interquartile range]; aliskiren and hydrochlorothiazide: 0.4 [0.2 to 1.1] versus 0.7 [0.5 to 1.3]; ramipril and aliskiren: 0.5 [0.3 to 0.9] versus 0.6 [0.5 to 0.8]; irbesartan and aliskiren: 0.4 [0.2 to 0.9] versus 0.6 [0.4 to 0.9]). These results suggest that renin inhibition with aliskiren in these combinations increases renin-angiotensin system suppression, improves 24-hour blood pressure control, and may ultimately provide better end-organ protection in patients with hypertension.