A controlled field trial of plain and aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed cholera vaccines in Surabaya, Indonesia, during 1973--75.

A controlled field trial comparing the effectiveness of a plain cholera vaccine with that of a vaccine adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide was carried out in a cholera-endemic area of Indonesia during 1973-75. Tetanus toxoid adsorbed to aluminium phosphate was used as the control. In vaccinees aged 1-4 years, the adsorbed cholera vaccine provided about 88% protection for 6 months following vaccination and still provided about 50% protection between 11 and 14 months after vaccination. In the same age group, the plain vaccine provided only 53% protection during the first 6 months and no appreciable protection beyond that period. In those aged 5 years and over, both vaccines provided 50-60% protection throughout the period of observation (14 months). Neither vaccine caused any serious side effects.     

Cholera vaccine field trials in east Pakistan. 2. Effectiveness in the field

A cholera-vaccine field trial in a rural area of East Pakistan where cholera is highly endemic has indicated that a high-potency whole-cell vaccine can provide significant protection against disease due to Vibrio cholerae for at least 18 months. This vaccine gave more than 70% protection during the first cholera season after vaccination. In the second cholera season after the administration of a single dose of vaccine, protection fell in those under 5 years of age, while continuing at significantly effective levels in older persons.     

Report of the 1966-67 cholera vaccine field trial in rural East Pakistan. I. Study design and results of the first year of observation

A controlled cholera vaccine field trial was carried out in rural East Pakistan during the 1966-67 cholera season. A commercial cholera vaccine of average potency was tested in 40 000 children aged 3 months to 14 years in 1- and 2-dose schedules. In the cholera season extending for 8 months following immunization, a single dose produced an over-all protection of 46%; 2 doses at an interval of 1 month provided 64% protection. The single dose was virtually ineffective in children under 5 years, but provided significant protection in older children. The enhanced effect of the 2-dose schedule was primarily due to the boosting of protection in children under the age of 5 years. The duration of significant protection, even with the 2-dose schedule, did not appear to extend beyond the first 3 months of the 8-month cholera season.     

Field trials of monovalent Ogawa and Inaba cholera vaccines in rural Bangladesh--three years of observation

A controlled cholera vaccine field trial was carried out to test the efficacy of monovalent whole-cell Inaba and Ogawa cholera vaccines and a purified Inaba antigen. This study was designed particularly to study the level of protection produced by these vaccines against homologous and heterologous serotypes and to correlate the results with mouse protection tests and human serological response to the vaccines. A cohort of 45 000 children, aged 0-14 years, was divided into a control group and three vaccine groups. Inoculations were given annually for 2 years just before the start of the cholera season, and follow-up was continued for one additional year. Essentially, all cholera cases were due to the Inaba serotype, so that protection could be studied only against that serotype. Two annual injections of the whole-cell Inaba vaccine gave the highest level of protection, averaging 84% over the 3 years of follow-up; a single injection of the purified Inaba vaccine gave less protection (51%). Two annual injections of the whole-cell Ogawa vaccine failed to protect children under the age of 5 but did produce 48% protection for children aged 5-14 against Inaba cholera. Serological surveys correlated poorly with protection; specifically, the Ogawa vaccine produced high anti-Inaba titres in young children but no protection. The cross-protection against Inaba cholera produced by Ogawa vaccine in the older children is assumed to be due to boosting of naturally acquired immunity in this population. Monovalent vaccine cannot be recommended for general public health use because of the serotype specificity of protection that this study has demonstrated.     

Report of the 1966-67 cholera vaccine trial in rural East Pakistan

A controlled cholera vaccine field trial was carried out in rural East Pakistan to determine the efficacy of a cholera vaccine of average antigenic potency when used in a continuing programme with annual reimmunizations. A cohort of 40 000 children aged 0-14 years was equally divided into a control group and 3 vaccine groups. Inoculations of vaccine were given annually for 3 years just before the start of the cholera season, and follow-up continued for 2 additional years. The results indicate that there was increasing protection with reimmunization, reaching a maximum with 3 doses. One dose produced 43% protection, 2 doses 64%, 3 doses 81%, and 4 doses 76%. Protection was more sustained after reimmunization; being 50% and 39%, 1 and 2 years after the fourth injection, respectively. Serological surveys suggested a general parallel in the antibody response to vaccine and the level of protection achieved; however, the levels of vibriocidal antibody titres could not be related directly to levels of protection. The overall protection achieved with the 3-year programme of annual reimmunizations was 55% for the group receiving one inoculation annually, and 65% for the group receiving 2 inoculations in the first year followed by annual reimmunizations. When the costs and effectiveness of annual vaccine programmes are compared with those for cholera treatment centres, it becomes clear that the cholera vaccines now available are not appropriate alternatives to treatment in routine cholera control programmes.     

Efficacy trial of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in North Jakarta, Indonesia, a cholera-endemic area

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of one dose of CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine was performed in Indonesia from 1993 to 1997. 67,508 persons aged 2-41 years ingested vaccine or placebo and were followed for four years, detecting cholera cases using hospital-based surveillance. A nested reactogenicity study (538 vaccinees, 535 controls) revealed no vaccine-attributable side effects. A nested immunogenicity study (N=657) showed vibriocidal seroresponses in 64-70% of vaccinees vs 1-2% of controls. Cholera incidence was lower than expected. 103 cases of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor diarrhea were detected, 93 evaluable for vaccine efficacy (43 vaccine, 50 placebo; efficacy=14%). A suggestion of protection was observed among persons with blood group O [P=0.12]. Only seven cases occurred within six months of vaccination, precluding assessment of short-term efficacy. In Jakarta, single-dose CVD 103-HgR did not confer long-term protection. Short-term protection from a single-dose and long-term protection from two doses have yet to be studied.     

A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines: Preliminary report

In a controlled field trial on some 584 000 people in an endemic cholera El Tor area in the Philippines, it was demonstrated that cholera vaccines gave moderate protection of short duration. Injection of a single dose of vaccine prepared from either Vibrio cholerae or Vibrio El Tor gave over 50% protection for the first two months. The immunity conferred by the V. cholerae vaccine rapidly declined after three to four months. The V. El Tor vaccine gave protection for six months, but its effectiveness declined. An oil-adjuvant vaccine prepared from V. cholerae conferred an increasing degree of protection of long duration, but, owing to severe vaccination reactions, its use could not be recommended.     

Seroprevalence of rubella antibodies in the State of São Paulo,Brazil, 8 years after the introduction of vaccine

Rubella vaccine was introduced in the official immunization calendar of the State of S?o Paulo, in 1992, at 15 months of age, following a mass vaccination targeting all children between 1 and 10 years of age. This mixed strategy was designed taking into account serological data and mathematical models to estimate the optimal ages for vaccination. To evaluate the efficacy of routine vaccination on rubella infection in S?o José do Rio Preto, State of S?o Paulo, 8 years after the introduction of vaccine, a seroprevalence survey was carried out in December 2000, comprising 1,536 subjects aging from 6 months to 25 years. Rubella specific IgG was detected in blood samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). From 18 months to 5 years of age (covered by a mass vaccination campaign 6 months before the study) the seroprevalence was above 90%. From 6 to 8 years of age (vaccinated by routine schedule at 15 months), the seroprevalence was 76%. From 9 to 18 years of age (vaccinated at the mass campaign that introduced the vaccine 8 years before) the seroprevalence was about 85%. After 20 years of age, protection was acquired by previous infection, as they were not covered by any vaccine program. From 20 to 25 years of age, the seroprevalence was 70%. As the seroprevalence remains low at ages not vaccinated, it should be expected low infection rates at this age window. Despite this, the present situation deserves care, as routine vaccination is given a protection below the minimum level necessary (80%). The efficacy of the proposed strategy depends on better routine vaccination coverage. A second dose of vaccine should also be considered.     

Long-term effectiveness against cholera of oral killed whole-cell vaccine produced in Vietnam

We assessed the long-term protection afforded by a killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine produced in Vietnam. A mass immunization of children and adults with the killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine was undertaken in half of the communes of Hue, Vietnam, in 1998; the remaining communes were immunized in 2000. No cholera was observed in Hue until 2003, when an outbreak of El Tor cholera made it possible to conduct a case-control study. The overall vaccine effectiveness 3-5 years after vaccination was 50% (9-63%). This low-cost, easily administered vaccine should be considered as a tool for the control of cholera.     

A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines

A controlled field trial on some 584 000 people in an endemic cholera El Tor area in the Philippines demonstrated that cholera vaccines gave moderate protection of short duration. Injection of a single dose of vaccine prepared from either Vibrio cholerae or El Tor vibrios gave over 50% protection for the first 2 months. The immunity conferred by the V. cholerae vaccine declined rapidly after 3 to 4 months. The effectiveness of the El Tor vaccine continued for 6 months. An oil-adjuvant vaccine prepared from V. cholerae conferred an equally high degree of protection for a longer period of time, but, owing to severe vaccination reactions, its use could not be recommended.     

Cost-effectiveness of childhood hepatitis A vaccination in Argentina: a second dose is warranted.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of childhood vaccination against hepatitis A in the five geographic regions of Argentina, and to determine whether adding a second dose to the current one-dose schedule would provide health gains justifying its added cost. METHODS: A Markov model was used to consider four immunization options for the 2005 birth cohort: (1) no vaccination; (2) vaccination at 12 months of age, (3) vaccinations at 12 and 72 months of age; or (4) vaccinations at 12 and 18 months of age. Hepatitis A costs and consequences were predicted over 50 years. The cost-effectiveness of first and second vaccine doses was assessed through a range of vaccine prices and assumptions regarding the duration of vaccine protection. Costs and health gains (measured in quality-adjusted life years) were adjusted to present values using a 3% annual discount rate. RESULTS: The one-dose vaccination policy is predicted to reduce each birth cohort member's 50-year probability of overt hepatitis A from 7.2% to 4.1%. A second dose would reduce the probability to between 2.0% and 2.2%. Vaccination at 12 months of age, at 12 and 72 months, or at 12 and 18 months would reduce cases among personal contacts by 82%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. The first vaccine dose would meet accepted standards of cost-effectiveness in each region, and reduce costs in the Northeast, Central, and South regions. Adding a second dose at age 18 months would be cost-effective in each region, and further reduce costs in the Cuyo region. If the duration of protection with one dose is less than anticipated, the second dose would be more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Greater health gains are derived from the first than second hepatitis A vaccine dose. However, this analysis supports the cost-effectiveness of providing both first and second doses to Argentina's children.     

Analysis of efficacy of CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine against all-cause travellers' diarrhoea in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), which produces heat labile toxin (LT) and/or heat stable toxin (ST), is considered to be the most common known cause of travellers' diarrhoea (TD). Owing to the antigenic similarity between cholera toxin and LT, immunization with inactivated oral B-subunit/whole-cell cholera vaccine (BS-WC) offers short term (3 months) but significant (>67%) protection against TD caused by LT-related ETEC. Since it expresses the cholera toxin B (CTB) subunit, the live attenuated oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR, may induce similar protection. A trial was performed to determine if CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine would provide a protective efficacy of at least 50% against TD. In addition, the protective efficacy of the vaccine against TD specifically due to LT-ETEC and LT/ST-ETEC was determined. Volunteers (n=134) travelling to Indonesia, India, Thailand or West-Africa were randomised to receive either a placebo (n=65) or the vaccine (n=69). In the placebo group, 46% reported an episode of diarrhoea, compared to 52% in the vaccine group. No significant group differences were found with regard to incidence, duration or severity of all caused TD or ETEC-associated TD. However, ETEC-associated TD occurred earlier in the placebo group (median 5 days), compared to the vaccine group (median 15 days). In conclusion, CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine failed to provide a 50% protection against TD. This study does not exclude that the vaccine may offer a short-lived protection against ETEC-associated TD. However, the power of the study was limited by the unexpected low incidence of LT-ETEC-associated diarrhoea (9% of all TD) compared to ST-associated TD (24% of all TD).     

Cost-Effectiveness of New-Generation Oral Cholera Vaccines: A Multisite Analysis

Objectives:  We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a low-cost cholera vaccine licensed and used in Vietnam, using recently collected data from four developing countries where cholera is endemic. Our analysis incorporated new findings on vaccine herd protective effects.
Methods:  Using data from Matlab, Bangladesh, Kolkata, India, North Jakarta, Indonesia, and Beira, Mozambique, we calculated the net public cost per disability-adjusted life year avoided for three immunization strategies: 1) school-based vaccination of children 5 to 14 years of age; 2) school-based vaccination of school children plus use of the schools to vaccinate children aged 1 to 4 years; and 3) community-based vaccination of persons aged 1 year and older.
Results:  We determined cost-effectiveness when vaccine herd protection was or was not considered, and compared this with commonly accepted cutoffs of gross domestic product (GDP) per person to classify interventions as cost-effective or very-cost effective. Without including herd protective effects, deployment of this vaccine would be cost-effective only in school-based programs in Kolkata and Beira. In contrast, after considering vaccine herd protection, all three programs were judged very cost-effective in Kolkata and Beira. Because these cost-effectiveness calculations include herd protection, the results are dependent on assumed vaccination coverage rates.
Conclusions:  Ignoring the indirect effects of cholera vaccination has led to underestimation of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination programs with oral cholera vaccines. Once these effects are included, use of the oral killed whole cell vaccine in programs to control endemic cholera meets the per capita GDP criterion in several developing country settings.     

Breast feeding and the risk of severe cholera in rural Bangladeshi children

The association between breast feeding and the risk of severe cholera was examined in a case-control study of rural Bangladeshi children under 36 months of age who were studied in 1985-1986 during a field trial of killed oral cholera vaccines. A total of 116 cases who were treated for severe cholera were compared with 464 age-matched community controls without severe cholera. Overall, the odds ratio relating breast feeding to severe cholera (0.30, p less than 0.0001) reflected a 70% reduction in the risk of severe cholera among breast-fed children. The estimated reduction of risk declined with age, but was clearly evident in children up to 30 months of age. Although the association between breast feeding and a reduced risk of severe cholera was not significantly greater in children of mothers who had received cholera vaccine than in children whose mothers had received placebo during the trial, maternal vaccination per se was suggestively associated with a reduced risk of severe cholera in their nonvaccinated children (odds ratio = 0.53, p = 0.05). These results indicate that breast feeding was associated with a substantial reduction of the risk of severe cholera and raise the possibility that vaccination of mothers may provide protection to their young children in endemic settings.     

Assessing different measures of population-level vaccine protection using a case–control study

BackgroundCase–control studies have not been examined for their utility in assessing population-level vaccine protection in individually randomized trials.MethodsWe used the data of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a cholera vaccine to compare the results of case–control analyses with those of cohort analyses. Cases of cholera were selected from the trial population followed for three years following dosing. For each case, we selected 4 age-matched controls who had not developed cholera. For each case and control, GIS was used to calculate vaccine coverage of individuals in a surrounding “virtual” cluster. Specific selection strategies were used to evaluate the vaccine protective effects.Results66,900 out of 108,389 individuals received two doses of the assigned regimen. For direct protection among subjects in low vaccine coverage clusters, we observed 78% (95% CI: 47–91%) protection in a cohort analysis and 84% (95% CI: 60–94%) in case–control analysis after adjusting for confounding factors. Using our GIS-based approach, estimated indirect protection was 52% (95% CI: 10–74%) in cohort and 76% (95% CI: 47–89%) in case control analysis. Estimates of total and overall effectiveness were similar for cohort and case–control analyses.ConclusionThe findings show that case–control analyses of individually randomized vaccine trials may be used to evaluate direct as well as population-level vaccine protection.     

The current status of diarrhoea related vaccines

Since diarrhea is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality in India as well as in developing and developed countries, public health specialists strive to develop vaccines against various pathogens which cause diarrhea. Rotavirus (RV) causes 20-40% of severe diarrhea among 6-24 month olds. So they hope for a single dose vaccine against all 4 RV serotypes which can be administered to newborns, but such a vaccine does not yet exist. The bovine and rhesus vaccines are the only heterologous candidate vaccines available, (as of the end of 1989). Another candidate vaccine is the human-animal reassortant RV vaccine where scientists incorporate the VP7 surface protein of human RV into animal RV. The 3rd type of RV candidate vaccine include the naturally attenuated human RV (nursery strains). Vibrio cholerae also causes significant diarrhea in India. Researchers have conducted field trials of many cholera vaccines since the mid 1990s, but they could not find a vaccine which could be used for mass vaccination against cholera. In fact, the cholera vaccine currently used only provides 50% protection, lasts 3-6 months, does not affect carriers, and does not protect against all strains. Salmonella typhi also causes diarrhea, especially among school age children and young adults. The results of large scale field trials in the 1960s reveal that 2 doses of the acetone inactivated typhoid vaccine performed the best of the injectable killed whole cell vaccines. In fact, it provides 79-93% protection and lasts 3-4 years. Further the live oral Ty21a lyophilized vaccine reconstituted in a liquid form and given in multiple doses provides comparable protection (71-96%) against typhoid as well as some protection against paratyphoid. Moreover they induce no side effects. Shigella species also cause diarrhea, especially in children. Various candidate vaccines against shigellosis include the spontaneously attenuated vaccines, streptomycin dependent vaccines, toxoid against exotoxins, and mutant hybrid strains.     

A controlled field trial on the effectiveness of the intradermal and subcutaneous administration of cholera vaccine in the Philippines

In view of the encouraging laboratory findings on the efficacy of intradermal administration of cholera vaccination in small doses, a controlled field trial was undertaken in the Philippines to evaluate the efficacy of the two routes for cholera vaccination. The trial has shown that these routes are effective, both giving a significant degree of protection against cholera. However, the vaccine afforded longer-lasting protection when administered subcutaneously (6 months) than when given intradermally (4 months), and was significantly more effective in children in the 1-5-year age group in this endemic area.     

Further observations on the stability of cholera vaccine at different temperatures

The stability of cholera vaccine samples held at 4-8 and 20-25 degrees C for 2 1/2 years was studied with regard to the number of organisms, total nitrogen content and relative antigenicity. After this length of time, the percentage loss in the number of organisms averaged 10.7 at 4-8 degrees C and 22.7 at 20-25 degrees C. The maximum loss in number of organisms took place during the first six months and in the next two years there was very little loss in the number of organisms. The total nitrogen content after 2 1/2 years remained almost unaltered at these temperatures. All the ten samples had acceptable relative antigenicity for both the Inaba and Ogawa serotypes after exposure at 4-8 degrees C for 2 1/2 years, while at 20-25 degrees C only two samples for the Inaba serotype and one sample for the Ogawa serotype retained antigenicity within acceptable limits after the same time. The loss of antigenicity after 2 1/2 years at 20-25 degrees C in comparison with antigenicity at 4-8 degrees C ranged from 41.5 to 83.1% (mean 61.9%) for the Inaba serotype and from 47.3 to 80.3% (mean 65.1%) for the Ogawa serotype. From this study on the cholera vaccine manufactured at the Central Research Institute, Kasauli, it is concluded that the shelf life of cholera vaccine may be increased from 18 months to at least 24 months, when the vaccine is stored under refrigeration.     

Effectiveness of an oral cholera vaccine campaign to prevent clinically-significant cholera in Odisha State,India

BackgroundA clinical trial conducted in India suggests that the oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol, provides 65% protection over five years against clinically-significant cholera. Although the vaccine is efficacious when tested in an experimental setting, policymakers are more likely to use this vaccine after receiving evidence demonstrating protection when delivered to communities using local health department staff, cold chain equipment, and logistics.MethodsWe used a test-negative, case-control design to evaluate the effectiveness of a vaccination campaign using Shanchol and validated the results using a cohort approach that addressed disparities in healthcare seeking behavior. The campaign was conducted by the local health department using existing resources in a cholera-endemic area of Puri District, Odisha State, India. All non-pregnant residents one year of age and older were offered vaccine. Over the next two years, residents seeking care for diarrhea at one of five health facilities were asked to enroll following informed consent. Cases were patients seeking treatment for laboratory-confirmed V. cholera-associated diarrhea. Controls were patients seeking treatment for V. cholerae negative diarrhea.ResultsOf 51,488 eligible residents, 31,552 individuals received one dose and 23,751 residents received two vaccine doses. We identified 44 V. cholerae O1-associated cases and 366 non V. cholerae diarrhea controls. The adjusted protective effectiveness for persons receiving two doses was 69.0% (95% CI: 14.5% to 88.8%), which is similar to the adjusted estimates obtained from the cohort approach. A statistical trend test suggested a single dose provided a modicum of protection (33%, test for trend, p = 0.0091).ConclusionThis vaccine was found to be as efficacious as the results reported from a clinical trial when administered to a rural population using local health personnel and resources. This study provides evidence that this vaccine should be widely deployed by public health departments in cholera endemic areas.     

Report of the 1966-67 cholera vaccine field trial in rural East Pakistan. 2. Results of the serological surveys in the study population--the relationship of case rate to antibody titre and an estimate of the inapparent infection rate with Vibrio cholerae

The 1966-67 cholera vaccine field trials in East Pakistan tested 1- and 2-dose schedules of a commercial cholera vaccine in 40 000 children aged 3 months to 14 years. Randomsample serological surveys, made prior to the inoculations and 3 months and 6 months after the inoculations, demonstrated that there was a rise in the vibriocidal titres of the vaccinated children during the first 3 months after inoculation and a subsequent fall by the end of the second 3 months. The antibody response to 2 doses of cholera vaccine was better than the response to a single dose in children under 5 years of age. In children aged 5-14 years, the antibody response was similar for both inoculation schedules. Since the majority of the older children had vibriocidal antibodies before inoculation, the data suggest that the single dose acted as a booster, and this effect was not enhanced by a second inoculation.