Total arterial bypass operations with complete sternotomy in the awake patient

BACKGROUND: In minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery beating heart procedures and operations via limited incisions became more popular and are routinely performed in many centers. An additional approach to minimize general trauma is avoidance of general anesthesia endotracheal intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March and June 2001, 14 spontaneously breathing patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart without general anesthesia. Intra- and postoperative analgesia management was performed using continuous epidural infusion of local anesthetics at level Th2-Th3. Single (n = 8) as well as double (n = 5) and triple (n = 1) bypass grafting was performed with the off pump technique. Surgical access to the chest cavity was created via partial (n = 8) or complete sternotomy (n = 6). RESULTS: Twelve patients remained awake throughout the procedure; 2 patients required secondary intubation due to incomplete sensory block and pneumothorax. Operating time was 94 +/- 18 minutes. Intermediate care monitoring time amounted to 4.8 +/- 0.6 hours. No surgery-related complications or myocardial infarction occurred. Postoperative angiography reviewed good graft function in all patients. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience shows that complete surgical revascularization is safe and feasible without endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia. Thus, invasiveness in cardiac surgery is further reduced with less need for intensive care unit monitoring enabling faster mobilization and recovery.     

Conscious off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Cardiothoracic surgery has been previously performed successfully under thoracic epidural anesthesia alone. Between October 2001 and December 2003, we performed 123 conscious off-pump coronary artery bypass surgeries using epidural anesthesia as the sole anesthetic. This technique is an alternative to cardiothoracic surgery performed under general anesthesia. Certain modifications in the technique facilitate the process. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were 24 female patients and 99 male patients with mean age of 58.6 +/- 6.2 years; 12 patients underwent repeat coronary artery bypass surgery. All the patients underwent epidural catheterization on the evening before surgery. Out of the 123 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 120 underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery successfully; 4 patients underwent off-pump surgery via left thoracotomy and the rest through mid sternotomy. These patients received 295 grafts in all (single graft in 26 patients, double in 42 patients, triple in 35 patients, and quadruple in 20 patients). Three patients required conversion to general anesthesia and one to cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no mortality in the group. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that by modifying the surgical techniques, we can accomplish conscious coronary artery bypass surgery.     

硬膜外阻滞对非停跳冠状动脉搭桥病人血内皮素及心钠素的影响

目的:观察高胸段硬膜外阻滞对冠心病行非停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCABG)患者血浆内皮素(ET)及心钠素(ANP)浓度的影响。方法:2O例拟行OPCABG患者根据麻醉方法随机分为两组:A组为气管内插管全麻组;B组为高胸段硬膜外阻滞复合气管内插管全麻组。采用放免法测定术前,术终,术后24h、48h血浆ET及ANP浓度,记录血流动力学参数及所用血管活性药剂量。结果:B组术后,术后 24h、48h ET及 ANP值显著低于A组(P<0.01,P<0.05),血流动力学稳定,所用血管活性药物较少(P<0.05)。结论:高胸段硬膜外阻滞能抑制麻醉手术所致的应激反应,对OPCABG病人的心脏有保护作用。     

Effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia on oxygen delivery and utilization in cardiac surgical patients scheduled to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective study

To evaluate the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on tissue oxygen delivery and utilization in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary referral heart hospital. A total of 25 patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were enrolled in this study. All patients received thoracic epidural catheter in the most prominent inter-vertebral space between C7 and T3 on the day before operation. On the day of surgery, an arterial catheter and Swan Ganz catheter (capable of measuring cardiac index) was inserted. After administering full dose of local anesthetic in the epidural space, serial hemodynamic and oxygen transport parameters were measured for 30 minute prior to administration of general anesthesia, with which the study was culminated. A significant decrease in oxygen delivery index with insignificant changes in oxygen extraction and consumption indices was observed. We conclude that TEA does not affect tissue oxygenation despite a decrease in arterial pressures and cardiac output.     

Coronary artery disease and upper abdominal surgery: impact of anesthesia on perioperative myocardial ischemia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Some papers claim that epidural anesthesia and analgesia lowers the incidence of perioperative ischemic events and may have a favorable effect on perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. We studied the effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative myocardial ischemia, in a group of patients with known coronary artery disease, who underwent upper abdominal surgery. METHODOLOGY: Fifty patients with coronary artery disease scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery, were randomized to two study groups: Group A (n = 25) received general anesthesia plus epidural anesthesia and analgesia, while group B (n = 25) received general anesthesia with postoperative i.v. analgesia. All patients had Holter ECG recording from 24 hours preoperatively until 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences in ischemic burden were observed between the two groups. Intraoperatively, significantly fewer patients in group A had ischemic episodes (8% vs. 36%, p < 0.05) and there was also a significant reduction in the number of ischemic episodes and in mean duration of ischemia per hour of monitoring. Similar findings were observed in the first 24 hours postoperatively but not later on, with 12% of patients in group A having ischemic episodes vs. 60% in group B (p < 0.01). Group A had significantly better pain control postoperatively. Only one third of ischemic episodes were related to hemodynamic abnormality, and most of them were clinically silent. No serious cardiac morbidity or mortality was observed during the period of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anesthesia and analgesia reduces intraoperative and early postoperative ischemia in patients with known coronary artery disease undergoing upper abdominal surgery.     

Comparison of frequencies of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass

This study compared the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in a group of 34 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia with a control group of 747 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass and standard cardioplegia. A trend toward a lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was found in the group that underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 0.06).     

Totalarterielle Bypassoperationen über komplette Sternotomie am wachen Patienten

Summary Backround In minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery beating heart procedures and operations via limited incisions became more popular and are routinely performed in many centers. An additinal approach to minimize general trauma is avoidance of general anesthesia endotracheal intubation. Patients and methods Between March and June 2001, 14 spontaneously breathing patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart without general anesthesia. Intra- and postoperative analgesia management was performed using continuous epidural infusion of local anesthetics at level Th2-Th3. Single (n=8) as well as double (n=5) and triple (n=1) bypass grafting was performed with the off pump technique. Surgical access to the chest cavity was created via partial (n=8) or complete sternotomy (n=6). Results Twelve patients remained awake throughout the procedure; 2 patients required secondary intubation due to incomplete sensory block and pneumothorax. Operating time was 94ᆦ minutes. Intermediate care monitoring time amounted to 4.8ǂ.6 hours. No surgery-related complications or myocardial infarction occured. Postoperative angiography reviewed good graft function in all patients. Conclusion Our preliminary experience shows that complete surgical revascularization is safe and feasible without endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia. Thus, invasiveness in cardiac surgery is further reduced with less need for intensive care unit monitoring enabling faster mobilization and recovery. Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Im Zuge der Entwicklung minimalinvasiver Operationstechniken in der Herzchirurgie gehören Koronarbypassoperationen am schlagenden Herzen und Operationen über limitierte Zugänge (“Schlüssellochoperationen”) inzwischen in vielen Zentren zur Routine. Eine weitere Möglichkeit der Minimierung des Operationstraumas besteht darin Patienten ohne Vollnarkose in Regionalanästhesie zu operieren. Methode Seit März 2001 wurde bei insgesamt 14 Patienten eine koronare Bypassoperation am schlagenden Herzen ohne Vollnarkose bei Spontanatmung durchgeführt. Hierzu wurde ein Periduralkatheter in Höhe von Th2-Th3 präoperativ eingelegt. Die Revaskularisation erfolgte total arteriell, wobei 8einfach, 5 zweifach und 1 dreifach Bypassgraft angelegt wurden. Die Zugänge verteilten sich auf sowohl komplette als auch partielle Sternotomien. Ergebnisse Zwölf Patienten blieben während der gesamten Operation wach. Zwei Patienten benötigten aufgrund einer unvollständigen Analgesie bzw. eines Pneumothorax eine sekundäre Intubation. Die mittlere Operationszeit betrug 94ᆦ Minuten. Der mittlere Aufenthalt auf der Überwachungsstation betrug 4,8ǂ,6 Stunden. Es traten keine postoperativen Komplikationen auf. Postoperativ zeigten alle Bypasses angiographisch eine gute Funktion. Schlussfolgerung Unsere bisherigen Erfahrungen zeigen, dass eine vollständige und sichere Revaskularisation auch am wachen Patienten möglich ist. Die Methode ermöglicht kürzere Operationszeiten, und beschleunigt die postoperative Rekonvaleszenz.     

Is off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery safe for left main coronary artery stenosis?

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has been well demonstrated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 1997 and December 2000, 174 patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without a pump. During the same period, 991 patients who also had significant left main coronary artery stenosis underwent coronary artery surgery on a pump. The patients in the two groups were matched in preoperative variables except that those in the off-pump group were slightly older, and more required urgent surgery. Hospital mortality was 2/174 and 21/991 in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively (p=0.560). The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (1.74 v. 14/991, p=0.712), atrial fibrillation (17/174 v 157/991, p=0.050) and blood transfusion requirement (63/174 v. 476/991, p=0.05) were significantly less in the off-pump group. The intubation time (15+/-3 hours v 22+/-4 hours, p=0.001), blood loss (365+/-61 ml v 582+/-76 ml, p<0.001), intensive care unit stay (23+/-10 hours v. 36+/-11 hours, p<0.001) and hospital stay (6+/-4 days v. 9+/-5 days, p <0.001) were also less in the off-pump group. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is safe and effective for patients with left main coronary artery disease.     

Prospective evaluation of anesthetic technique for anorectal surgery

PURPOSE: Deep intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia for anorectal surgery in the prone position is used frequently at our institution, but is not widely accepted because of concerns regarding airway management. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of this anesthetic technique for anorectal surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 413 consecutive patients (mean age, 47 years; mean weight, 80 kg) undergoing anorectal surgical procedures. RESULTS: Of the 389 patients who underwent anorectal procedures in the prone position, 260 (67 percent) received intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia, 125 (32 percent) received regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural), and 4 (1 percent) received general endotracheal anesthesia. Of the 24 patients who underwent anorectal procedures in the lithotomy position, 13 (54 percent) received intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia, 2 (8 percent) received regional anesthesia, 2 (8 percent) received general endotracheal anesthesia, and 7 (29 percent) received mask inhalational anesthesia. Forty-two adverse events attributable to the anesthetic occurred in 18 patients: nausea and vomiting (n = 17), transient hypotension, bradycardia, or arrhythmia (n = 8), transient hypoxia or hypoventilation (n = 7), urinary retention (n = 6), and severe patient discomfort (n = 2). These complications occurred in 4 percent (10/273) of patients receiving intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia and in 6 percent (8/127) of patients receiving regional anesthesia. Two of 260 patients (0.8 percent) receiving intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia in the prone position were rolled supine before completing the surgical procedure. Recovery time before discharge for patients treated on an ambulatory basis was significantly shorter for those patients undergoing intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia (79 +/- 34 minutes, n = 174) than for patients undergoing regional anesthesia (161 +/- 63 minutes, n = 45; P < 0.001, t-test). CONCLUSION: Intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia in the prone position is safe and effective for anorectal surgery and offers potential cost savings by decreasing recovery room time for outpatient procedures.     

Heart valve surgery in a very high-risk population: a preliminary experience in awake patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Heart valve surgery in high-risk patients is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Epidural anesthesia without mechanical ventilation has been proposed to reduce invasiveness. An analysis was conducted in very high-risk heart valve patients of mid-term survival free from complications, and patient satisfaction of regional anesthesia use, without mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A prospective follow up study was conducted in 50 patients (24 females, 26 males; mean age 74 +/- 10 years; range: 43-89 years) who underwent heart valve surgery with epidural anesthesia without endotracheal intubation. Preoperatively, all patients were in NYHA class III or IV; eight patients (16%) had undergone a previous cardiac procedure. The median Additive and Logistic EuroSCORE were 14.5 and 52%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement, 10 mitral valve replacement, 10 mitral valve repair, two double valve replacement, and one patient ascending aorta replacement. Associated surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 12 patients (24%), ascending aorta replacement in three (6%), and left ventricle reshaping in two (4%). Radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) was performed in 15 patients (30%). All patients were prospectively followed up, and a six-month quality of life assessment was performed in all survivors. RESULTS: Procedures were performed without mechanical ventilation in completely awake and conscious patients. There were two in-hospital and two long-term deaths (8%). Three patients had had previous cardiac surgery (two double valve replacements, two complex mitral valve surgery). Among survivors, 34 (71%) had an uneventful postoperative outcome, except for AF in nine cases. Eight patients required revision for bleeding; two of these were redo cases. The most consistent postoperative complication was acute renal failure in 16 patients, five of whom had previous chronic renal failure. Three patients required mechanical ventilatory support, and none had a cerebrovascular accident. Patients were discharged home after a mean of 10 +/- 5 days (including ICU stay; median 9 h). At follow up, all patients were in NYHA class I/II, and all survivors expressed their satisfaction with epidural anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Heart valve surgery while on cardiopulmonary bypass is feasible and safe using epidural anesthesia. By maintaining autonomic ventilation, a low mid-term morbidity and mortality was observed in patients in whom there was an unacceptable operative risk.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and contributes to favorable long-term results

The aim of this study was to determine the indication for minimally invasive direct coronary artery surgery based on the operative and long-term results of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Operative results: The subjects included 505 patients who underwent isolated elective coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1995 through August 1999. The mean age at the time of surgery was 61.9 and the mean number of grafts per patient was 2.6. Long-term results: From January 1984 to December 1995, a total of 907 patients received coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass using the internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery with or without saphenous vein grafts to other coronary arteries. The rates of complete and incomplete revascularization were 69.3% (n = 629) and 30.7% (n = 278), respectively. Mean follow-up was 5.95+/-3.0 years. The operative results revealed low output syndrome occurred in 14 patients (2.8%), perioperative myocardial infarction with the appearance of new Q-waves in 5 (1.0%), renal failure requiring transient dialysis in 16 (3.2%), stroke with persistent sequelae in 5 (1.0%), and mediastinitis in 5 (1.0%). Two patients (0.4%) died in the hospital. The long-term results for the 907 patients revealed the 10-year actuarial survival, 10-year cardiac death free, and 10-year cardiac event free rates were 85.7%, 94.1%, and 77.3%, respectively. The 10-year survival rates was 88.4% among patients receiving complete revascularization and 79.3% among those receiving incomplete revascularization (p = 0.0334). The 10-year cardiac death free rate among patients undergoing complete revascularization was 96.3% and 88.7% among those receiving incomplete revascularization (p = 0.0016). The 10-year cardiac event free rates were 82.3% and 67.9%) among patients undergoing complete and incomplete revascularization, respectively (p = 0.0118). In view of the favorable operative and long-term results of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, especially complete revascularization, we conclude that minimally invasive direct coronary artery grafting is an appropriate treatment for multi-vessel disease in carefully selected patients at a high risk for stroke and major comorbidities due to old age.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis and coronary bypass surgery

PURPOSE: To assess whether there is survival benefit for patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis if they undergo aortic valve replacement at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: From 1985 to 1995 we evaluated all patients at our institution who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and who had the echocardiographic diagnosis of mild (mean gradient <0 mm Hg and/or valve area >1.5 cm(2)) or moderate (mean gradient > or =30 and < or =40 mm Hg and/or valve area >1.0 < or =1.5 cm(2)) aortic stenosis. Using propensity analysis, survival was compared between 129 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery alone and 78 patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was similar among patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery alone compared with patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year and 8-year survival were better at 90% and 55% for patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement compared with 85% and 39% for patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery alone (P <0.001). This benefit was limited to patients with moderate aortic stenosis (propensity-adjusted relative risk = 0.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 0.96; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Concomitant aortic valve replacement at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery for mild or moderate aortic stenosis appears to convey a survival advantage for patients with moderate aortic stenosis but not for those with mild aortic stenosis.     

Usefulness of revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease before elective vascular surgery for abdominal aortic and peripheral occlusive disease

The Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) study showed no survival benefit with preoperative coronary artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery. The generalizability of the trial results to all patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) has been questioned. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of prophylactic coronary revascularization on long-term survival in patients with multivessel CAD. Over a 4-year period, 1,048 patients underwent coronary angiography before vascular surgery during screening into the CARP trial. The cohort was composed of registry (n = 586) and randomized (n = 462) patients, and their survival was determined at 2.5 years after vascular surgery. High-risk coronary anatomy without previous bypass surgery included 2-vessel disease (n = 204 [19.5%]), 3-vessel disease (n = 130 [12.4%]), and left main coronary artery stenosis >/=50% (n = 48 [4.6%]). By log-rank test, preoperative revascularization was associated with improved survival in patients with a left main coronary artery stenoses (0.84 vs 0.52, p <0.01) but not those with either 2-vessel (0.80 vs 0.79, p = 0.83) or 3-vessel (0.79 vs 0.71, p = 0.15) disease. In conclusion, unprotected left main coronary artery disease was present in 4.6% of patients who underwent coronary angiography before vascular surgery, and this was the only subset of patients showing a benefit with preoperative coronary artery revascularization.     

Beating heart versus conventional reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: The incidence of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing with an increase in the number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The clinical outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass are different. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared clinical parameters in patients who underwent off-pump (n=156) versus on-pump (n=194) redo coronary artery bypass grafting performed between January 1995 and December 2001 in our institute, to determine if off-pump surgery has improved the surgical outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting and emerged as an ideal technique. Patients who underwent on-pump redo surgery required more postoperative blood transfusion (86.53% on-pump v. 12.82% off-pump. p=0.001), prolonged ventilatory support (>24 hours) (16.49% on-pump v. 7.7% off-pump, p=0.021) and higher inotropic support (23.71% on-pump v. 10.89% off-pump, p=0.003). On-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting was also associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (40+/-6.2 hours on-pump v. 20+/-4.1 hours off-pump, p=0.001) and longer hospital stay (9+/-4.2 days on-pump v. 5+/-3.4 days off-pump, p=0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in on-pump patients than in off-pump ones (7.7% v. 3.2%); however, this was not statistically significant (p=0.114). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting is a safe method of myocardial revascularization with lower operative morbidity and mortality, less requirement of blood products and early hospital discharge, compared with conventional on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Headache and seizures after cervical epidural injection in a patient undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Epidural analgesia is widely used in cardiothoracic surgery. Most of the complications associated with epidural analgesia are related to the insertion techniques of epidural catheter. A 68-year-old obese patient posted for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery developed headache followed by seizures after insertion of the thoracic epidural catheter. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed air in the basal cisterns and in the left frontal region. The patient was managed conservatively and the symptoms subsided after 24 h. Later, the patient underwent coronary angioplasty.     

Dysfunction of aortocoronary bypass. Prognosis]

From 1978 to 1988, 108 patients with at least one occluded or stenosed aorto-coronary bypass graft (over 75% stenosis) underwent coronary angiography on average 31 months after the initial coronary bypass surgery. The occluded or stenosed coronary graft was either a saphenous vein (n = 126 including 9 sequentials) or internal mammary artery (n = 5). The bypassed artery was the left anterior descending (n = 66), right coronary (n = 40), left marginal (n = 25) or diagonal (n = 9). The number of occluded or stenosed grafts by patient was 1.2. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 55% (range 25 to 77%). During a mean follow-up period of 60 months after coronary angiography, there were 14 cardiac deaths and 15 non-lethal myocardial infarctions. Treatment comprised 12 angioplasties, 26 new bypass grafts and 3 cardiac transplantations. The 8 year actuarial survival was 84%. The survival without infarction at 8 years was 69%. Survival was significantly decreased to 72% when the occluded or stenosed graft was located on the left anterior descending artery. The survival without infarction at 8 years was 52% in the patients with dysfunction of left anterior descending artery grafts and 89% when the diseased graft was located on another artery (right coronary, left marginal, diagonal). Therefore, the data of this retrospective study show that coronary graft dysfunction on the right coronary, left marginal or diagonal arteries do not greatly influence life expectancy in the medium term after coronary bypass surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on the occurrence of late postoperative hypoxemia in patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia followed by postoperative epidural analgesia compared with conventional IV anesthesia on the occurrence of late postoperative hypoxemia in patients undergoing elective coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Cardiac surgery unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 50 patients undergoing elective CABG surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either conventional IV anesthesia (CON) or general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia followed by postoperative epidural analgesia (TEA) with bupivacaine. Postoperatively, the patients were monitored in the surgical ward with a pulse oximeter for a total of two postoperative nights (the second and third postoperative nights). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The overall incidence of episodic hypoxemia was 56% (28 of 50 patients) on the second postoperative night and 89% (41 of 46 patients) on the third postoperative night. More than 30 episodes of hypoxemia developed on the second night in 22% of patients (11 of 50 patients), and on the third night in 30% of patients (14 of 46 patients). Despite oxygen therapy, 7% of patients (3 of 46 patients) experienced constant hypoxemia on the third night. In general, hypoxemia seemed to be slightly worse on the third postoperative night compared with the second postoperative night. Significantly more patients in the TEA group (25 of 25 patients) experienced episodic hypoxemia on the third postoperative night compared with the CON group (16 of 21 patients; p < 0.05). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Both episodic and constant hypoxemia were common in the late postoperative period in patients on the ward after CABG surgery with no clinically significant intergroup differences. Thus, perioperative epidural anesthesia/analgesia combined with postoperative epidural anesthesia/analgesia was not protective against hypoxemia, and therapy with opioids did not seem to be of importance for the occurrence of late postoperative hypoxemia on nights 2 and 3 after CABG surgery.     

体外循环与非体外循环下行CABG对肾功能不全患者肾功能影响的比较

目的:比较在体外循环与非体外循环下行冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）对患者肾功能的影响。方法: 我院40位择期行CABG的慢性肾功能不全患者,随机分为两组,每组20例,分别在在体外循环与非体外循环下行CABG。术前及术后1、3、7 d测定血肌酐值并计算肌酐清除率。结果: 体外循环组患者术后血肌酐值显著高于非体外循环组,其肌酐清除率较术前显著下降。结论:肾功能不全患者在体外循环与非体外循环下行CABG,前者更易加重肾功能损害。     

Coronary lesions due to aortic valve disease. II -- Results and indications of aortocoronary bypass surgery]

454 cases of aortic valve replacement were studied: 217 had no significant coronary artery disease, 197 had associated aorto-coronary bypass surgery and 40 coronary artery disease without revascularization surgery:-- The early mortality in the three groups was 5.5%, 21% and 12.5% respectively, the only statistically significant difference being between the first two groups. -- The coronary artery disease was signigicantly more severe in the group which underwent associated aorto-coronary bypass surgery. The early mortality was significantly raised in the group without bypass surgery in cases with severe coronary artery disease (28%) and in the group with bypass surgery with unsuitable coronary artery lesions (35.5%). On the other hand, the long term survival and functional capacity of patients who underwent associated bypass surgery approached that of the non-coronary patients. Combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery should therefore be continued in selected cases.     

Thoracic epidural anesthesia does not influence the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after beating heart surgery

BACKGROUND: At least 20 - 30 % of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or beating-heart surgery develop postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on the occurrence of postoperative AF in patients submitted to CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (OPCABG). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 125 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Early postoperative incidence of AF was compared between three groups of patients - 50 after conventional CABG, 45 after OPCABG, and 30 after OPCABG combined with TEA intraoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical profile of the patients, including factors with a potential influence on postoperative AF was matched for groups. RESULTS: Postoperative AF occurred in 13.3 % of the TEA-treated patients, in 17.7 % of the patients in the OPCABG group, and in 26 % of the patients in the CABG group. This difference did not carry any statistical significance. Risk factors and incidence of postoperative complications were comparable in all groups. CONCLUSION: TEA has no effect on the incidence of postoperative AF in patients undergoing beating-heart surgery.