Spotlight on lamotrigine in bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels.     

Spotlight on olanzapine/fluoxetine in acute bipolar depression

Olanzapine/fluoxetine (Symbyax((R))) is an oral once-daily fixed-dose combination of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine and the SSRI fluoxetine that is approved in the US for the treatment of depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder in adults. Combination therapy with olanzapine plus fluoxetine is effective in the treatment of patients with acute bipolar depression. The combination improves depressive symptoms and symptom severity in this patient population, with an efficacy greater than that of olanzapine alone or lamotrigine. Furthermore, olanzapine plus fluoxetine is generally well tolerated. Although associated with weight gain and potential elevations in glucose, lipid and prolactin levels, the combination does not increase the risk of treatment-emergent mania. Additional placebo- and active comparator-controlled studies are required in order to confirm the efficacy of olanzapine/fluoxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression and to definitively position olanzapine/fluoxetine with respect to other agents. In the meantime, fixed-dose olanzapine/fluoxetine offers an effective and generally well tolerated first-line option for the treatment of acute bipolar depression.     

Open-label olanzapine treatment in bipolar I disorder: clinical and work functional outcomes

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe clinical and work functional outcomes associated with 6‐month open‐label olanzapine treatment for bipolar I disorder.

Methods: The study consisted of 249 patients entering a 6‐month open label phase after 12 weeks of acute double-blind haloperidol or olanzapine treatment. Baseline for analysis was defined as the beginning of open-label treatment. The clinical outcomes were symptomatic remission defined by a Y‐MRS total score ≤ 12 and a HAM‐D total score ≤ 8 at the end of 6 months of treatment. The work functional outcomes included work functional scores, the proportion of patients who reported to ‘work’ as employee, volunteers, students, or house workers and the proportion of patients who specifically reported to ‘work for pay’.

Results: A total of 240 patients reported work functional outcomes post open-label baseline. Among them, 15.4% patients moved into a ‘work group’ from a ‘no-work group’ at baseline, while 7.1% did the opposite (?p = 0.0065) and 13.3% reported an improvement to ‘work for pay’ status from a ‘not working for pay’ status at baseline, while there was 4.2% of worsening in employment status (?p = 0.0007). Overall, improvement in the work functional score was found at all post-baseline time points, beginning at month two (?p = 0.003).

Limitations: Results of this study need to be confirmed by double-blind randomized controlled studies. There was a lack of detailed information on work functioning from the questionnaire.

Conclusions: Open‐label olanzapine treatment for 6 months was associated with improvements in work functional outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder.     

Open-label olanzapine treatment in bipolar I disorder: clinical and work functional outcomes

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe clinical and work functional outcomes associated with 6-month open-label olanzapine treatment for bipolar I disorder. METHODS: The study consisted of 249 patients entering a 6-month open label phase after 12 weeks of acute double-blind haloperidol or olanzapine treatment. Baseline for analysis was defined as the beginning of open-label treatment. The clinical outcomes were symptomatic remission defined by a Y-MRS total score < or = 12 and a HAM-D total score < or = 8 at the end of 6 months of treatment. The work functional outcomes included work functional scores, the proportion of patients who reported to 'work' as employee, volunteers, students, or house workers and the proportion of patients who specifically reported to 'work for pay'. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients reported work functional outcomes post open-label baseline. Among them, 15.4% patients moved into a 'work group' from a 'no-work group' at baseline, while 7.1% did the opposite (p = 0.0065) and 13.3% reported an improvement to 'work for pay' status from a 'not working for pay' status at baseline, while there was 4.2% of worsening in employment status (p = 0.0007). Overall, improvement in the work functional score was found at all post-baseline time points, beginning at month two (p = 0.003).Limitations: Results of this study need to be confirmed by double-blind randomized controlled studies. There was a lack of detailed information on work functioning from the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Open-label olanzapine treatment for 6 months was associated with improvements in work functional outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder.     

Spotlight on quetiapine in acute mania and depression associated with bipolar disorder

Quetiapine (Seroquel), an atypical antipsychotic with established efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia, shows efficacy in the treatment of acute mania and depression associated with bipolar disorder.Quetiapine, either as monotherapy or in combination with lithium or divalproex sodium (valproate semisodium), is generally well tolerated and effective in reducing manic symptoms in adult and adolescent patients with acute bipolar mania, and is approved for use in adults for this indication. As monotherapy, the drug is also effective in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar depression. It is associated with a low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related adverse events and low EPS ratings in bipolar disorder. Quetiapine thus shows potential in the treatment of bipolar depression, and represents a useful agent for the treatment of acute bipolar mania.     

Spotlight on quetiapine in bipolar depression

Quetiapine (Seroquel) is the only atypical antipsychotic approved in the US for use as monotherapy in both bipolar mania and depression, offering potential compliance advantages. Monotherapy with oral quetiapine 300 mg/day is effective in the treatment of patients with bipolar I or II depression. Rapid and sustained improvements in depressive and anxiety symptoms are seen with quetiapine, as well as improvements in health-related quality of life. Quetiapine is generally well tolerated in bipolar depression and is not associated with an increased risk of treatment-emergent mania. Thus, despite the current lack of data from active comparator trials, quetiapine monotherapy should be considered a first-line option for the acute treatment of bipolar depression.     

Extended-release carbamazepine capsules : in bipolar I disorder

An extended-release capsule formulation of carbamazepine is approved for use in adult patients experiencing an acute manic or mixed episode associated with bipolar I disorder. A capsule of extended-release carbamazepine contains three types of bead: immediate release, extended release and enteric release, constituting 25%, 40% and 35% of the dose, respectively.black triangle Extended-release carbamazepine capsules 200--1600 mg/day demonstrated superior antimanic efficacy to placebo in two 3-week, well designed trials in adult patients with bipolar I disorder and acute manic or mixed episodes. At study end, reductions from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale scores were significantly greater with carbamazepine than with placebo (primary endpoint). The active treatment was effective from the end of the first week of treatment (post hoc analysis).black triangle In the 3-week trials and a 6-month extension study, most treatment-emergent adverse events observed with extended-release carbamazepine were of mild or moderate severity. In the 3-week trials, although significantly greater reductions in white blood cell count occurred with extended-release carbamazepine than with placebo, only one case of leukopenia was deemed serious. There were no reports of agranulocytosis or aplastic anaemia with up to 6 months' treatment.     

Spotlight on bupropion in major depressive disorder

Bupropion is presumed to be a dopamine-noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitor and is an effective antidepressant. It is available as three oral formulations: (i) bupropion immediate release (IR) [Wellbutrin] administered three times daily; (ii) bupropion sustained release (SR) [Wellbutrin SR] administered twice daily; and (iii) bupropion extended/modified release (XR) [Wellbutrin XL/Wellbutrin XR] administered once daily. All three formulations are bioequivalent in terms of systemic exposure to bupropion. Oral three-times-daily bupropion IR was effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). It was as efficacious and as well tolerated as some TCAs and the SSRI fluoxetine. Moreover, it was associated with less somnolence and weight gain than some TCAs. Twice-daily bupropion SR was also efficacious and generally well tolerated in the treatment of MDD. It was as effective as and had a generally similar tolerability profile to some SSRIs, but had the advantage of less somnolence and sexual dysfunction. The efficacy of bupropion XR in terms of primary efficacy measures was established in two of six well designed placebo-controlled studies. Bupropion XR also demonstrated efficacy in terms of some secondary outcomes in five of these studies. Additionally, bupropion XR was similar, in terms of the primary efficacy outcomes, to the SSRI escitalopram in two placebo-controlled trials and to the serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine extended release (XR) in two trials (one of which was placebo-controlled), but not in a third placebo-controlled trial where venlafaxine XR was better than bupropion XR. It was generally as well tolerated as escitalopram and venlafaxine XR, but was associated with less sexual dysfunction than escitalopram. Available clinical data suggest that bupropion is an effective and generally well tolerated option in the treatment of MDD, with the newer formulations having the advantage of reduced frequency of daily administration.     

Weight gain and changes in metabolic variables following olanzapine treatment in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

Antipsychotic therapy forms the cornerstone of treatment for people with severe mental illness. Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics are associated with a significantly lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms than the typical, first-generation agents; however, changes in metabolic variables -- including impaired glucose metabolism, diabetes mellitus, weight gain and dyslipidaemia -- have been reported during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. Understanding any potential link between antipsychotic treatment and the incidence of these events is complicated by the increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes occurring in the general population and the increased risk of diabetes and changes in metabolic variables in people with schizophrenia. While relative risk estimates are inconsistent, the association between atypical antipsychotics and increases in glucose level appears to fall on a continuum, with olanzapine appearing to have a greater association than some other atypical antipsychotics. The PubMed database was used to search for publications that included any information on measures of changes in weight, body mass index (BMI) and/or metabolic variables in randomized studies of olanzapine published between 1992 and 2010. In long-term (≥48 weeks) studies of olanzapine, the mean weight gain was 5.6?kg (last observation carried forward; median exposure 573 days). The proportions of patients who gained at least 7%, 15% or 25% of their baseline weight with long-term exposure were 64%, 32% and 12%, respectively. Some studies have suggested that weight gain early during the course of olanzapine treatment may predict clinically significant weight gain following long-term exposure to the drug. Changes in metabolic variables, such as elevated indices of glucose metabolism and triglyceride level, have also been observed during treatment with olanzapine. Consensus guidelines emphasize the importance of appropriate baseline screening and ongoing monitoring of weight gain and metabolic variables for people receiving all antipsychotic treatments. Long-term weight management programmes have been shown to reduce weight gain in some patients.     

Safety and efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy and olanzapine with a mood stabilizer in 18-week treatment of manic/mixed episodes for Japanese patients with bipolar I disorder

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the safety and efficacy of 18-week olanzapine monotherapy in Japanese patients with bipolar mania, following a 6-week, placebo- and haloperidol-controlled double-blind study (acute study). For those who discontinued the acute study due to lack of efficacy, safety and efficacy was assessed with a combination therapy of olanzapine and a mood stabilizer.     

Cost effectiveness of olanzapine in prevention of affective episodes in bipolar disorder in the United Kingdom

This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of olanzapine compared with lithium as maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder (BP1) in the UK. A Markov model was developed to assess costs and outcomes from the perspective of the UK National Health Service over a 1-year period. Patients enter the model after stabilization of a manic episode and are then treated with olanzapine or lithium. Using the findings of a recent randomized clinical trial, the model considers the monthly risk of manic or depressive episodes and of dropping out from allocated therapy. health care resources associated with acute episodes were derived primarily from a recent UK chart review. Costs of maintenance therapy and monitoring were also considered. Key factors influencing cost effectiveness were identified and included in a stochastic sensitivity analysis. The model estimated that, compared to lithium, olanzapine significantly reduced the annual number of acute mood episodes per patient from 0.81 to 0.58 (difference -0.23; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.12). Per patient average annual care costs fell by 799 UK pounds (95% CI: - 1,824 UK pounds, 59 UK pounds) driven by reduced inpatient days--but the cost difference was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis found the results to be robust to plausible variation in the model's parameters. The model estimated that using olanzapine instead of lithium as maintenance therapy for BP1 would significantly reduce the rate of acute mood events resulting in reduced hospital costs. Based on available evidence, there is a high likelihood that olanzapine would reduce costs of care compared to lithium.     

Treatment of bipolar I rapid cycling patients during dysphoric mania with olanzapine

The simultaneous presentation of manic and depressive symptoms in the same patient is fairly common. The terms and have been used as equivalents to mixed states. Pharmacotherapy is less effective in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine as an add-on therapy in patients with bipolar disorder with a rapid cycling course during a dysphoric mania episode. Thirteen patients treated with mood stabilizers for at least 1 year and diagnosed with a mixed episode were included in an open trial. All had at least 4 episodes in the last year. Patients with organic diseases, including altered thyroid function, were excluded from the research. Patients were evaluated at inclusion and at day 28. Response was defined as a decrease of 50% in the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression concomitant with a Clinical Global Impression improvement of 1 or 2. All patients completed the study. The doses of olanzapine were 16.15 +/- 5.82 mg/day. There was a reduction in the manic and depressive symptoms in all patients. Ten of the 13 patients were considered to have responded to the treatment according to the response definition. Adverse effects included somnolence (23.08%) and weight gain (0.81 +/- 1.96 kg in women, 2.20 +/- 2.28 kg in men). Our results suggest that olanzapine combined with mood stabilizers is safe and effective in the treatment of the manic and the depressive symptoms of dysphoric mania with a rapid cycling course.     

Spotlight on ziprasidone in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Ziprasidone is a novel antipsychotic agent with a pharmacological profile distinct from that of other currently available novel or classical antipsychotics. In preclinical studies, ziprasidone was predicted to have efficacy against positive, negative and affective symptoms of schizophrenia with a favourable tolerability profile, including a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal adverse effects. The drug has been administered orally to >300 patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in published 4- to 6-week randomised, double-blind trials. When given twice daily at dosages of between 80 and 160 mg/day, ziprasidone produced significantly greater improvements in overall symptomatology than placebo. In the largest study, ziprasidone 80 or 160 mg/day was also significantly more effective than placebo in reducing negative symptoms and, at 160 mg/day, was significantly more effective than placebo in improving depressive symptoms in patients with associated clinically significant depression. Data from a 4-week trial indicate that ziprasidone 160 mg/day has similar efficacy to haloperidol 15 mg/day. Ziprasidone 40 to 160 mg/day was more effective than placebo with respect to prevention of impending relapse and improvement of negative symptoms in 294 stable patients with chronic schizophrenia who were treated for up to 1 year. In addition, significantly more ziprasidone than haloperidol recipients achieved a negative symptom response in a 28-week study involving 301 stable patients with chronic or subchronic schizophrenia. In general, oral ziprasidone is well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to placebo. Importantly, the drug has a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal effects and a negligible effect on bodyweight. Ziprasidone is associated with slight prolongation of the QTc interval; the clinical significance of this is not yet clear. The drug does not appear to be associated with sustained elevation of plasma prolactin levels. Preliminary data indicate that long-term oral ziprasidone treatment is well tolerated. Ziprasidone is the only novel antipsychotic currently available in a rapid-acting intramuscular formulation. Short-term treatment with intramuscular ziprasidone was effective and well tolerated in patients with acute agitation associated with psychosis. In addition, intramuscular ziprasidone reduced agitation scores by a significantly greater extent than haloperidol in a study involving patients with acute agitation associated with psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone is a promising new antipsychotic that has shown significant efficacy in the oral treatment of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The drug is well tolerated with a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal effects and a negligible effect on bodyweight. In addition, intramuscular ziprasidone shows efficacy and good tolerability in the treatment of acute agitation associated with psychotic disorders.     

An overview of pharmacotherapy for bipolar I disorder

Introduction: Bipolar I disorder (BD I) is complex with a chronic course that significantly impacts a sufferer’s quality of life. As of right now, there are many available treatments that aim to rapidly treat manic or depressive episodes and stabilize mood. The purpose of this report is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive review of the available evidence-based trials of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of BD I.

Areas covered: This paper reviews randomized active comparator-controlled or placebo-controlled trials evaluating the use of current pharmacotherapy in adults with BD I from phase III to clinical practice. Monotherapy and combination therapy for acute and long-term treatment were reviewed for this purpose.

Expert opinion: There are many treatments available for BD mania; however, the depressive and stabilization phases of the illness remain a clinical challenge. Unfortunately, randomized controlled trials do not represent ‘real world’ patients, as their strict inclusion and exclusion criteria do not allow for different features sometimes present in patients to be considered. Research efforts must also focus on treating cognitive deficits, which adds to lower functional outcome. The authors believe that there is dire need for new, more targeted treatments in BD I, with a critical view of the side effects.     

Reversible bilateral sensori-neural hearing loss due to olanzapine in a male suffering from bipolar affective disorder

An elderly male with Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) developed reversible ototoxicity, manifesting as bilateral sensory-neural hearing loss (SNHL) with administration of olanzapine.KEY WORDS: Olanzapine, bipolar affective disorder, ototoxicity     

喹硫平或奥氮平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片治疗维族双相障碍精神病的疗效研究

目的 探讨喹硫平、奥氮平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片对维族双相障碍精神病临床疗效的影响。方法 选择2015年6月—2016年6月在乌鲁木齐市第四人民医院治疗双相障碍精神病的患者100例,随机分为2组,每组50例,对照组患者服用奥氮平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片,观察组患者服用喹硫平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片,服药1、4、8周时患者于医院进行复查,填写17项HMDM评分表、BRMD评分表以及GSI-IS评分表评估两组患者在不同时间的抑郁、躁狂情况和临床疗效。结果 两组患者在治疗期间,临床症状减轻,治疗1、4、8周时HMDM评分、BRMD评分以及GSI-IS评分均显著低于治疗前（P＜0.05）,且随疗程的延长,症状趋于减轻甚至消失;观察组各量表评分比对照组低,但是统计学分析无显著差异。记录两组患者治疗过程中发生不良反应的情况,结果显示观察组患者不良反应的总发生率和头晕嗜睡的发生率较对照组明显降低（P＜0.05）。结论 奥氮平或喹硫平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片可以有效控制维族双相障碍患者抑郁、躁狂症状,且奥氮平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片可以显著降低不良反应发生率,值得临床推广应用。     

Ziprasidone for maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder in adults

INTRODUCTION: Antipsychotic drugs are increasingly used in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. This review addresses the evidence supporting the use of one of these medications for this indication in order to place available data in perspective for the clinician. AREAS COVERED: The approval of ziprasidone for maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder was based on two open-label extensions of industry-sponsored 3-week monotherapy trials in mania, involving a total of 189 patients and an industry-sponsored study using sample enrichment of 584 outpatients who had either ziprasidone or a placebo added to lithium or valproate. Patients enrolled in maintenance studies did not have refractory mood disorders or comorbid conditions or risk of dangerousness, and they were able to give sustained consent. Ziprasidone is generally well tolerated, but should be taken with food. Primary interactions of concern are those with other serotonergic medications and other medications that prolong the QT interval. EXPERT OPINION: Although antipsychotic drugs are used frequently for maintenance treatment, current guidelines recommend that an attempt be made to withdraw them after acute treatment. The use of these medications as part of a maintenance regimen is most appropriate in cases of persistent psychosis or failure to respond to standard mood stabilizer combinations.