Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization

AIMS: Clinical studies comparing nebulized drug delivery systems could be flawed because of the high doses used. We have compared lung and total systemic delivery of salbutamol from a nebuliser with that from a metered dose inhaler by measuring urinary recovery of drug and its sulphate metabolite. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers provided urine samples at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the start of dosing. Formulations and doses were 5 x 100 microg oral solution (ORAL), 5 x 100 microg from a metered dose inhaler (MDI), 2.5 mg using a nebuliser (NEB) and NEB with 25 g oral charcoal (NEBC). Each study phase was separated by 7 days and the order of dosing was randomized. RESULTS: Mean (s.d.) 30 min urinary salbutamol excretion after ORAL, MDI, NEB and NEBC was 0.4 (0.7), 12.1 (3.7), 15.0 (3.9) and 18.2 (5.7) microg, respectively (all P<0.001 compared with ORAL). When normalized for the dose available for inhalation from MDI, NEB and NEBC, the mean (s.d.) 30 min urinary excretion of salbutamol was 2.4 (0.7), 2.9 (0.6) and 2.7 (0.6)%, respectively, with a mean ratio (90% confidence interval) between NEB and NEBC, of 95.3 (91.1, 99.5)%. The mean (s.d.) excretion of salbutamol plus its metabolite over 24 h post ORAL, MDI, NEB and NEBC dosing was 297.9 (38.3), 290.3 (41.4), 266.5 (44.6) and 151.7 (40.9) microg, respectively. The mean ratio (90% confidence interval) between MDI and ORAL, and NEB and ORAL were 97.5 (94.1, 101.0) and 90.7 (81.2, 100.2)%, respectively. The NEBC data indicate that 6.07 (1.04)% of the nominal nebulized dose was delivered to the lungs. CONCLUSIONS: The 30 min urinary recovery of salbutamol, an index of the relative systemic bioavailability of salbutamol following inhalation, can be used to compare the lung deposition of nebulized systems. Similarly, the urinary 24 h recovery of salbutamol plus its metabolite, an index of the relative systemic bioavailability of salbutamol following inhalation, can be used to compare the delivery of nebulized drug to the systemic circulation.     

Relative lung and total systemic bioavailability following inhalation from a metered dose inhaler compared with a metered dose inhaler attached to a large volume plastic spacer and a jet nebuliser

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lung and systemic delivery of salbutamol following inhalation from a metered dose inhaler (MDI), a MDI attached to a spacer (MDI+SP) and a nebuliser (NEB) using a urinary pharmacokinetic method. METHOD: Twelve healthy subjects each provided urine samples at 0, 30 min and pooled up to 24 h after the start of 5 x 100 microg salbutamol inhaled from MDI and MDI + SP and after 2.5 mg was delivered by NEB. Following nebulisation, the amount of salbutamol trapped on an exhalation filter together with that remaining in the apparatus was determined. The amount left in the spacer and that leaving the MDI mouthpiece was also determined. Thus, for all the methods, the amount available for inhalation from each study dose was determined. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) 30-min urinary excretion amounts of salbutamol for MDI, MDI+SP and NEB were 12.6+/-3.5, 27.1+/-6.0 and 16.1+/-4.6 microg, respectively. The mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for MDI+SP compared with MDI and NEB were 230.2 (186.7, 273.8) and 183.0 (146.4, 219.7) (both P values<0.001), respectively, while that between MDI and NEB was 134 (110.4, 159.1) (P < 0.05). The mean (+/-SD) 24-h urinary excretion values for salbutamol and its metabolite were 287.0+/-46.5, 198.1+/-34.7 and 253.4+/-138.3 microg, respectively. Following inhalation a mean of 202.9+/-51.5 microg was left in the spacer. Similarly, after nebulisation 1387.7+/-88.9 microg was left in the nebuliser chamber, 26.3+/-8.0 microg in the mouthpiece and 553.8+/-68.5 microg exhaled. The mean emitted dose from the MDI was 88.4+/-6.1 microg per actuation. When normalised for the amounts available for inhalation, the mean amounts of salbutamol excreted in the urine during the first 30 min were 2.86+/-0.78, 9.15+/-1.69 and 3.06+/-0.70% following MDI, MDI + SP and NEB, respectively. CONCLUSION: Five 100-microg doses inhaled from a metered dose inhaler attached to a spacer delivered more to the lungs and less to the systemic circulation than either the same doses from a metered dose inhaler used alone or five times the dose given via a jet nebuliser. Spacers should be routinely used instead of nebulisers to manage patients unless they are short of breath.     

Relative bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate to the lung following inhalation, using urinary excretion

AIMS: To determine if a urinary excretion method, previously described for salbutamol, could also indicate the relative bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate to the lung following inhalation from a metered dose inhaler. Method Inhaled (INH), inhaled+oral charcoal (INHC), oral (ORAL) and oral+oral charcoal (ORALC) 20 mg doses of sodium cromoglycate were given via a randomised cross-over design to 11 healthy volunteers trained on how to use a metered dose inhaler. Urine samples were collected at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 and up to 24 h post dosing and the sodium cromoglycate urinary concentration was measured using a high performance liquid chromatographic method. RESULTS: No sodium cromoglycate was detected in the urine up to 24 h following ORALC dosing. A mean (s.d.) of 3.6 (4.3) microg, 10.4 (10.9) microg and 83.7 (71.1) microg of the ORAL dose was excreted, in the urine, during the 0.5, 1.0 and 24 h post dose collection periods, respectively. Following INH dosing, the renal excretion was significantly higher (P<0.01) with 32.9 (14.5) microg, 61.2 (28.3) microg and 305.6 (82.3) microg excreted, respectively. The SCG excreted at 0.5, 1.0 and 24 h collection periods following INHC dosing were 26.3 (8.4) microg, 49.3 (18.1) microg and 184.9 (98.4) microg, respectively. There was no significant difference between the excretion rate of sodium cromoglycate following INHC when compared with INH dosing in the first 0.5 and 1.0 h. CONCLUSIONS: The urinary excretion of sodium cromoglycate in the first 0.5 h post inhalation can be used to compare the relative lung deposition of two inhaled products or of the same product using different inhalation techniques. This represents the relative bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate to the lung following inhalation. Similar 24 h urinary excretion of sodium cromoglycate can be use to compare the total dose delivered to the body from two different inhalation products/inhalation methods. This represents the relative bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate to the body following inhalation. Because of the lack of difference between the INH and INHC in the first 0.5 h, the use of activated charcoal is not necessary when this method is used to compare the relative lung bioavailability of different products or techniques.     

Relative lung and systemic bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate inhaled products using urinary drug excretion post inhalation

The relative lung and systemic bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate following inhalation by different methods have been determined using a urinary excretion pharmacokinetic method. On three separate randomised study days, 7 days apart, subjects inhaled (i) 4x5 mg from an Intal metered dose inhaler (MDI), (ii) 4x5 mg from an MDI attached to a large volume spacer (MDI+SP) and (iii) 20 mg from an Intal Spinhaler (DPI). Urine samples were provided at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 24 h post dose. The mean (S.D.) amount of sodium cromoglycate excreted in the urine during the first 30 min post inhalation was 38.1 (27.5), 222.3 (120.3) and 133.1 (92.2) microg following MDI, MDI+SP and DPI, respectively. The mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of these amounts excreted in the urine over the first 30 min for MDI+SP vs. MDI, DPI vs. MDI and MDI+SP vs. DPI was 801.0 (358.0, 1244; p<0.002)%, 457.0 (244.0, 670.0; p<0.02)% and 262.4 (110.2, 414.5)%, respectively. Similarly for the 24 h cumulative amount of sodium cromoglycate excreted over the 24 h post inhalation the ratios were 375.4 (232.9, 517.9; p<0.005)%, 287.5 (183.4, 391.6; p<0.02)% and 211.4 (88.3, 334.5)%, respectively. The results highlight better lung deposition of sodium cromoglycate from a metered dose inhaler attached to a large volume spacer.     

Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation.

1. The urinary excretion of salbutamol and its sulphate metabolite was measured following oral (4 mg) and inhaled (4 x 100 micrograms) administration of salbutamol. 2. Total urinary recovery of salbutamol and its sulphate conjugate indicated a mean (s.d.) relative bioavailability of 92.2 (24.8) % following inhalation compared with oral administration. 3. The mean (s.d.) elimination half-lives of salbutamol and its sulphate conjugate were 5.7 (1.4) and 4.1 (2.1) h, respectively, after oral administration and following inhalation they were 6.1 (2.1) and 5.1 (1.0) h, respectively. 4. Following oral and inhaled administration it was found that in the first 30 min the mean (s.d.) percentage of the dose excreted in the urine as unchanged salbutamol was 0.18 (0.14) and 2.06 (0.80) %, respectively (P < 0.01). The drug content of a urine sample taken 30 min after inhalation is, therefore, considered to be representative of the amount of drug delivered to the lungs. It is proposed that this method can be used to evaluate the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation by different techniques and devices.     

Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation via a novel dry powder inhaler and a standard metered dose inhaler

Aims The number of dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices could increase because they are easier to use than a metered dose inhaler (MDI). Using urinary excretion, the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and the body for a prototype DPI has been compared with an MDI.
Methods A randomized, double-blind, two way crossover study compared the amount of salbutamol in the urine 30  min following inhalation of 2×100  μg salbutamol from a prototype DPI (Innovata Biomed Ltd, UK) and a Ventolin^® (Allen and Hanburys Ltd, UK) MDI in 10 volunteers. The amount of salbutamol and its metabolite, the ester sulphate conjugate, renally excreted up to 24  h post inhalation was also determined to evaluate the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the body.
Results The mean (s.d.) 30  min post-treatment urinary excretion for the prototype DPI and MDI was 8.4 (2.6) and 5.0 (1.9)  μg, respectively ( P <0.001). The total amount of salbutamol and its ester metabolite excreted in the urine over the 24  h period after inhalation was 187.9 (77.6) and 137.6 (40.0)  μg ( P <0.05).
Conclusions The prototype DPI delivered more salbutamol to the body and the lungs than a conventional MDI. This finding supports further development of the prototype DPI. The urinary salbutamol method is able to discriminate between two different inhalation systems.     

Enantiomeric disposition of inhaled, intravenous and oral racemic-salbutamol in man--no evidence of enantioselective lung metabolism

Aims To establish whether enantioselective metabolism of racemic (rac )-salbutamol occurs in the lungs by determining its enantiomeric disposition following inhalation, in the absence and presence of oral charcoal, compared with that following the oral and intravenous routes. Methods Fifteen healthy subjects (eight male) were randomized into an open design, crossover study. Plasma and urine salbutamol enantiomer concentrations were measured for 24 h following oral (2 mg) with or without oral charcoal (to block oral absorption), inhaled (MDI; 1200 microg) with or without oral charcoal and intravenous (500 microg) rac-salbutamol. Systemic exposure (plasma AUC(0,infinity) and urinary excretion (Au24h ) of both enantiomers were calculated, and relative exposure to (R)-salbutamol both in plasma (AUC(R)-/AUC(S)- ) and urine (Au(R)-/Au(S)- ) was derived for each route. Relative exposure after the inhaled with charcoal and oral routes were compared with the intravenous route. Results AUC(R)-/AUC(S)- [geometric mean (95% CI)] was similar following the intravenous [0.32 (0.28, 0.36)] and inhaled with charcoal rates [0.29 (0.24, 0.36); P=0.046], but was far lower following oral dosing [0.05 (0.03, 0.07); P<0.001]. Similar results were found when relative exposure was analysed using Au24h. Conclusions These results show no evidence of significant enantioselective presystemic metabolism in the lungs, whilst confirming it in the gut and systemic circulation, indicating that the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers are present in similar quantities in the airways following inhaled rac-salbutamol.     

Comparison of the extrapulmonary beta2-adrenoceptor responses and pharmacokinetics of salbutamol given by standard metered dose-inhaler and modified actuator device

1. Ten healthy subjects were randomised to inhale salbutamol via a standard metered-dose inhaler (MDI), or via a modified metered-dose actuator device (MA). Previously published radiolabelled aerosol data had shown that the MA device produced a lower aerosol velocity, reduced oropharyngeal deposition, but with unchanged pulmonary deposition. 2. Dose-response curves (DRC) were constructed with the following cumulative doses of salbutamol: 200 microg, 600 microg (200 microg + 400 microg), 1400 microg (600microg + 800 microg) ad 2600 microg (1400 + 1200 microg). Dose increments were made every 30 min and measurements of extrapulmonary beta2-adrenoceptor responses were performed 20 min after each dose. In addition, plasma salbutamol concentrations were also measured immediately before and for up to 60 min after the last dose. 3. Baseline values were not significantly different between the two study days for any of the measured parameters. 4. Cmax (ng ml(-1)) for plasma salbutamol (as means and 95% CI for difference between MA and MDI) was: 2.0 (0.3-3.7), P = 0.03. Values for t(max) (min), median and range: MA 5 (5-10) vs MDI 5 (5-10); and AUC 0-60, (ng ml(-1) min, mean and 95% CI for difference between MA and MDI): 69 (-5-143), were not significantly different between the two devices. 5. There was a significant (P < 0.01) left shift in the DRC with the MA device compared with the MDI, for hypokalaemic, finger tremor, chronotropic and electrocardiographic (Twave, Q-Tc) responses to salbutamol. Values for the hypokalaemic response (mmol l(-1)) at 2600 microg were (as change from baseline, means and 95% CI for difference between MA and MDI): 0.23 (0.10-0.36). 6. Thus, the MA device produced greater systemic absorption of salbutamol, and associated extrapulmonary beta2-adrenoceptor responses compared with a standard MDI. These results, therefore, suggest that data from radiolabelled aerosol deposition studies may not predict the systemic absorption of inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists.     

Dose-response relationship and reproducibility of urinary salbutamol excretion during the first 30 min after an inhalation

AIMS: To determine the reproducibility and dose-response relationship for urinary salbutamol excretion post inhalation. METHODS: Fifteen volunteers inhaled either one, two, three, four or five doses of 100 micro g salbutamol on separate days and then seven of these also repeated each of the one, three and five doses on five occasions. After each study dose urine was collected 30 min post inhalation. RESULTS: The mean (SD) 30 min urinary salbutamol after one, two, three, four and five doses was 2.61 (1.0.), 5.47 (1.59), 8.68 (2.73), 12.34 (3.96) and 15.99 (4.50) micro g, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed a linear relationship (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) coefficient of variation after one, three and five doses was 10.5 (3.6), 10.1 (2.7) and 9.4 (2.3)%. CONCLUSIONS: The 30 min salbutamol urinary excretion post inhalation pharmacokinetic method, to compare inhaled products, is linear with inhaled dose and reproducible.     

沙丁胺醇气雾剂在健康受试者体内的药物动力学和相对生物利用度

目的:研究沙丁胺醇气雾剂在健康受试者的药物动力学和生物利用度.方法:十名健康男性志愿者单剂量吸入1.2 mg沙丁胺醇气雾剂或口服沙丁胺醇水溶液.用HPLC法测定人血浆中沙丁胺醇浓度.以非房室模型计算药物动力学参数,计算气雾剂相对水溶液的生物利用度.结果:气雾剂和口服溶液的药物动力学参数如下:T_(max)(0.22±0.07)和(1.8±0.6)h,C_(max)(3.4±1.1)和(3.9±1.4)μg·L~(-1),T_(1/2)(4.5±1.5)和(4.6±1.1)h,AUC_(0-20min)(0.9±0.3)和(0.16±0.10)μg·h·L~(-1).两种给药途径的T_(max)和AUC_(0-20 min)之间差异显著(P<0.01).AUC_(0-20min)(nihal)为 AUC_(0-20 min)(po)的 8倍.沙丁胺醇气雾剂相对口服溶液的生物利用度为 57％±24％.结论:沙丁胺醇气雾剂在人体的吸收过程与口服溶液差异有显著性.     

Assessment of different methods of inhalation from salbutamol metered dose inhalers by urinary drug excretion and methacholine challenge

AIMS: Methods to determine the lung delivery of inhaled bronchodilators from metered dose inhalers include urinary drug excretion 30 min post inhalation and methacholine challenge (PD20). We have compared these two methods to differentiate lung delivery of salbutamol from metered dose inhalers using different inhalation methods. METHODS: In phase 1 of the study, on randomized study days, 12 mild asthmatics inhaled placebo, one and two 100 microg salbutamol doses from a breath actuated metered dose inhaler, in randomized fashion on different days. In phase 2, they inhaled one 100 microg salbutamol dose from a metered dose inhaler using a SLOW (20 l min(-1)) and a FAST (60 l min(-1)) inhalation technique and a slow inhalation delayed until after they had inhaled for 5 s (LATE). Urinary excretion of salbutamol (0-30 min) and PD20 were measured after each dose. RESULTS: Following placebo, one and two 100 microg salbutamol doses, the geometric mean for PD20 was 0.10, 0.41 and 0.86 mg respectively and the mean (SD) urinary drug excretion after one and two doses was 2.25 (0.65) and 5.37 (1.36) microg, respectively. After SLOW, FAST and LATE inhalations the geometric mean for PD20 was 0.50, 0.40 and 0.42 mg, respectively, and mean (SD) salbutamol excretion was 2.67 (0.84), 1.90 (0.70) and 2.72 (0.67) microg, respectively. Only the amount of drug excreted during the FAST compared with the SLOW and LATE inhalations showed a statistical difference (95% confidence interval on the difference 0.12, 1.54 and 0.06, 1.59 microg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary salbutamol excretion but not PD20 showed differences between the inhalation methods used. When using a metered dose inhaler slow inhalation is better and co-ordination is not essential if the patient is inhaling when they actuate a dose of the drug.     

Relative bioavailability of terbutaline to the lung following inhalation, using urinary excretion

AIMS

The aim of the study was to determine the relative lung and systemic bioavailability of terbutaline.

METHODS

On separate days healthy volunteers received 500 µg terbutaline study doses either inhaled from a metered dose inhaler or swallowed as a solution with and without oral charcoal. Urine samples were provided at timed intervals post dosing.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) urinary terbutaline 0.5 h post inhalation, in 12 volunteers, with (IC) and without (I) oral charcoal and oral (O) dosing was 7.4 (2.2), 6.5 (2.1) and 0.2 (0.2) µg. I and IC were similar and both significantly greater than O (P < 0.001). Urinary 24 h terbutaline post I was similar to IC + O. The method was linear and reproducible, similar to that of the urinary salbutamol method.

CONCLUSIONS

The urinary salbutamol pharmacokinetic method post inhalation applies to terbutaline. Terbutaline study doses can replace routine salbutamol during these studies when patients are studied.     

Intra-subject variability in lung dose in healthy volunteers using five conventional portable inhalers.

High intra-subject variability in lung dose achieved when using aerosol delivery systems may impact on the efficacy of treatment in clinical practice. While the dose delivered by metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is highly reproducible when tested in vitro, the variability in dose delivered to the lungs is known to be high. It has been suggested that newer delivery systems such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs) or breath actuated pMDIs significantly reduce the intra-subject variability in lung dose, but this remains untested. The 30-min urinary salbutamol technique was used to assess intra-subject variability in lung dose for five portable inhaler devices. Thirteen healthy adult subjects inhaled salbutamol from five different devices. Each device was used at five separate study days, a total of 25 visits. The devices studied were the Evohaler pMDI, a pMDI with Volumatic (pMDI + HC), the Easibreath, the Accuhaler and the Turbohaler. Subjects inhaled 400 microg of salbutamol and produced a urine sample exactly 30 min later. Quantities of salbutamol contained in the urine were determined using an HPLC technique. The mean coefficient of variation (CV% and range) for lung dose were 31.8% (20.1-87.4) for the pMDI + HC, Easi-breathe 35.9% (10.4-66.2), Accuhaler 40.4% (15.6-75.2), Turbohaler 42.4% (20.7-74.2), and 52.0% (27.1-49.3) for the pMDI alone. There was no significant statistical significant difference between any of the devices. In seven of 13 subjects, the greatest lung dose was achieved with the Volumatic. The observed intra-subject in health volunteers is similar to the reported intra-subject variability of bioavailability for a number of oral medications. Though there was trend towards higher variability when using the pMDI, this was not statistically significant and was largely attributable to one subject in with a poor technique.     

New HPLC assay for urinary salbutamol concentrations in samples collected post-inhalation

A new reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with florescence detection and two solid phase extraction (SPE) methods have been developed, optimised and validated for determining salbutamol in human urine after an inhalation. SPE methodology for unchanged salbutamol (USAL) and salbutamol plus its metabolites (USALMET) concentrations in urine has been developed using terbutaline as the internal standard. Confirm HCX cartridges were used for USAL and Oasis HLB for USALMET. Calibration lines of salbutamol urine standards were linear over the range 25–300 μg/L with mean (RSD) r² values of 0.9983 (0.06%) for USAL and 0.9976 (0.202%) for USALMET. The HPLC method was accurate (mean bias −0.40% for USAL and 0.46% for USALMET) and precise (mean RSD 5.0% for USAL and 2.90% for USALMET). The calculated LOD and LOQ for salbutamol using a 1 mL urine sample were 4.0 and 12.12 μg/L for USAL, and 4.80 and 14.56 μg/L for USALMET, respectively. The mean (RSD) SPE recoveries of salbutamol were 90.82% (2.32%) for USAL and 91.54% (2.96%) for USALMET. Both HPLC and SPE methods were applied to quantify unchanged and metabolised salbutamol excreted in urine after the inhalation of 200 μg salbutamol from metered dose inhalers (MDIs) by 14 healthy volunteers. Charcoal slurries were also ingested to prevent gastro-intestinal absorption. Urine samples were collected at 30 min post-inhalation and then pooled for the next 24 h. All urine concentrations were within the sensitive portion of the assay. The volunteer study revealed that following inhalation from an MDI about 20% of the nominal dose is deposited into the lungs and 46% is delivered to the systemic circulation. The results confirm the application, sensitivity, reliability and robustness of the HPLC and SPE methods for urinary pharmacokinetic studies after salbutamol inhalations using therapeutic doses.     

Pharmacokinetics of loxiglumide after single intravenous or oral doses in man

Loxiglumide (D,L-4-(3,4-dichlorobenzoylamino)-5-(N-3-methoxypropyl-pentylam ino)-5-oxo-pentanoic acid, CR 1505) was given intravenously to 8 male healthy volunteers in a single dose of 2 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) or orally in a single dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. Loxiglumide was measured in plasma and in urine by HPLC during 48 h following the administration. After i.v. infusion the plasma levels were consistent with an open two-compartment pharmacokinetic model represented by the equation C (mg/l) = 43.791 x e-2.652 x h + 2.657 x e-0.139 x h. In the urine, besides loxiglumide, two metabolites were found and in the 48 h following the i.v. administration the urinary excretion of loxiglumide and of its metabolites accounted for 11.13% of the administered dose. After oral administration loxiglumide appeared in plasma with a lag time of 14 min, reached the peak 34 min after administration, being eliminated with an initial fast and a terminal slow elimination rate. The plasma levels were consistent with an open two-compartment pharmacokinetic model represented by the equation C (mg/l) = -46.72 x e-8.765 x (h-0.23) + 40.660 x e-1.383 x (h-0.23) + 6.057 x e-0.120 x (h-0.23). In the urine, besides loxiglumide, two metabolites were found and in the 48 h following the oral administration the excretion of loxiglumide and of its metabolites accounted for 7.67% of the administered dose. The absolute bioavailability of loxiglumide was calculated comparing the AUC(0-inf) found after oral and after i.v. administration and was estimated as 0.967, with p = 0.05 fiducial limit of 0.656-1.278.     

Urinary pharmacokinetic methodology to determine the relative lung bioavailability of inhaled beclometasone dipropionate

AIM

Urinary pharmacokinetic methods have been identified to determine the relative lung and systemic bioavailability after an inhalation. We have extended this methodology to inhaled beclometasone dipropionate (BDP).

METHOD

Ethics Committee approval was obtained and all subjects gave consent. Twelve healthy volunteers received randomized doses, separated by >7 days, of 2000 µg BDP solution with (OralC) and without (Oral) 5 g oral charcoal, 10 100 µg inhalations from a Qvar® Easibreathe metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with (QvarC) and without (Qvar) oral charcoal and eight 250 µg inhalations from a Clenil® pMDI (Clenil). Subjects provided urine samples at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 24 h post study dose. Urinary concentrations of BDP and its metabolites, beclometasone-17-monopropionate (17-BMP) and beclometasone (BOH) were measured.

RESULTS

No BDP, 17-BMP or BOH were detected in any samples post OralC dosing. Post oral dosing no BDP was detected in all urine samples and no 17-BMP or BOH was excreted in the first 30 min. Significantly more (P < 0.001) BDP, 17-BMP and BOH were excreted in the first 30 min and the cumulative 24 h urinary excretions post Qvar and Clenil compared with Oral. The mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the 30 min urinary excretions for Qvar compared with Clenil was 231.4 (209.6, 255.7) %.

CONCLUSION

The urinary pharmacokinetic methodology to determine the relative lung and systemic bioavailability post inhalation, using 30 min and cumulative 24 h post inhalation samples, applies to BDP. The ratio between Qvar and Clenil is consistent with related clinical and lung deposition studies.     

A Method for Determination of the Absolute Pulmonary Bioavailability of Inhaled Drugs: Terbutaline

Terbutaline sulfate (4 × 0.250 mg) was given to 11 healthy volunteers by inhalation from a metered dose inhaler (MDI), with and without oral administration of a charcoal slurry. Before the inhalations, the adsorbing capacity of the charcoal slurry was tested. Deuterated terbutaline, 0.125 mg, was given intravenously at the same time as the test doses. The charcoal slurry adsorbed 97% of an oral dose. The oral contribution to the overall systemic bioavailability after inhalation, when charcoal was coadministered, could thus be neglected. After inhalation of terbutaline, 9.1% of the dose was deposited in the lungs and an additional 6.7% was systemically available via the oral route. The method presented measures the absolute pulmonary bioavailability after inhalation from a MDI. Since a deuterated analogue is given intravenously together with the inhalations, fewer subjects are needed to obtain reliable data.     

Relative lung deposition of salbutamol following inhalation from a spacer and a Sidestream jet nebulizer following an acute exacerbation

Background

Studies comparing inhalation methods in acute exacerbations have not assessed lung deposition.

Methods

Five 100-μg salbutamol doses were inhaled from a metered dose inhaler plus spacer (MDI + SP) and 5 mg was nebulized (NEB) following acute exacerbation hospitalization. Urinary salbutamol excretion was determined at 30 min (USAL0.5) and over 24 h (USAL24) postinhalation together with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁).

Results

The USAL0.5 mean ratio (90% confidence interval) post MDI + SP and NEB [n = 19 asthma, 11 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)] was 1.01 (0.81, 1.26). USAL24 was less (P < 0.001) following MDI + SP, whereas FEV₁ was similar. Only a small difference between asthmatics and COPD patients was observed for the MDI + SP in that the USAL0.5 was higher in the asthmatics for the spacer method.

Conclusion

The relative lung deposition after inhaling 500 μg salbutamol from MDI + SP is similar to 5 mg from a Sidestream nebulizer following an acute exacerbation.

What is already known about this subject

• Studies have shown that a large volume spacer attached to a metered dose inhaler provides similar bronchodilator effects to nebulized dosing during the management of patients following an acute exacerbation.
• Due to the high doses used, these effects could be measured at the top of the dose–response relationship and the response limited due to the patient''s exacerbation.
• Although clinical end-points are the gold standard to show comparability, some indication of similar lung deposition is useful to consolidate any claims.

What this study adds

• The urinary pharmacokinetic method we have used postinhalation provides an index of lung deposition for inhalation methods that can be incorporated into the routine management of patients with an acute exacerbation.
• This is the first study to identify and compare lung deposition and systemic delivery for inhalation methods within the setting of the routine management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients following hospitalization due to an acute exacerbation.
• The study highlights the comparability of the doses for the two inhalation methods evaluated with respect to lung deposition, systemic delivery and bronchodilator response.

     

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of oral and sublingual cyproheptadine

BACKGROUND: Cyproheptadine is reported to be effective in treating serotonin syndrome. It is only available as an oral preparation and administration after SSRI overdose treated with activated charcoal is problematic. Sublingual administration may circumvent this problem. The pharmacokinetics of sublingual cyproheptadine are not characterized. This study compares the pharmacokinetics of cyproheptadine following oral and sublingual administration. METHODS: Cross-over, non-blinded, volunteer study using five healthy males. Eight milligrams of oral and sublingual cyproheptadine were administered on separate occasions with a one-week washout period. Sublingual arm subjects were pretreated with 50 g of oral activated charcoal 30 min prior to cyproheptadine, to prevent any gut absorption. Serum cyproheptadine concentration was measured at baseline, 30 min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h by liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy. RESULTS: Mean C(max) for oral and sublingual were 30.0 microg/L and 4.0 microg/L respectively: mean T(max) were 4 h and 9.6 h; mean AUC were 209 and 25 microg x hr/L. Mean +/- SEM within-subject difference between oral and sublingual C(max) was 25.9 +/- 4.1 (p = 0.003) and AUC was 184 +/- 31 (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Serum concentrations after sublingual cyproheptadine are significantly less than after oral administration. At these concentrations, the sublingual route is unlikely to be effective in treating serotonin syndrome.     

Salbutamol relative lung and systemic bioavailability of large and small spacers

Differences between the size and shape of spacers may affect the emitted dose and provide different effects when interchanged during routine use. Using a urinary pharmacokinetic method we have measured the relative lung and systemic bioavailability from urinary salbutamol excretion 30 min (USAL0.5) and 24 h (USAL24), respectively, after the inhalation of two 100‐μg doses from a Ventolin Evohaler when used alone (MDI) and when attached to the Volumatic (VOL) or the Aerochamber Plus (AERO) spacers. The in‐vitro properties of the emitted dose were determined. The mean (s.d.) USAL0.5 values following MDI, VOL and AERO (n = 13 volunteers) were 5.7 (1.9), 16.4 (8.2) and 14.8 (7.4) μg, respectively. VOL and AERO were significantly greater (P < 0.001 and < 0.01, respectively) than MDI. Comparison of VOL and AERO was similar with a mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of 108.2 (84.5, 138.6)%. USAL24 values between the three inhalation methods were similar. The values for the mean (s.d.) fine particle dose of two 100‐μg doses emitted from MDI, VOL and AERO were 83.0 (6.8), 83.6 (4.6) and 73.6 (2.9) μg and the mass median aerodynamic diameters were 2.7 (0.03), 2.8 (0.07) and 2.9 (0.10) μm, respectively. The results showed that during routine use the Volumatic and the Aerochamber Plus spacers should provide similar lung and systemic delivery when attached to a Ventolin Evohaler.