Atrioventricular nodal tachycardia with and without discontinuous anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction curves: a reappraisal of the dual pathway concept

To illustrate the complexity of the electrophysiological behaviourof the human alrioventricular (A–V) node, two patientssuffering from A–V nodal tachycardia are described. Duringtachycardia an A–V nodal slow pathway was used for anterogradeconduction, and an A–V nodal fast pathway for retrogradeconduction. Patient 1 showed smooth A–V nodal conductioncurves in both the anterograde and the retrograde direction.Tachycardia could only be initiated by ventricular prematurebeats. No critical delay in ventriculo-atrial conduction timewas required for initiation of tachycardia. Patient 2 showedsmooth A–V nodal conduction curves at the lowest rateof pacing during atrial and ventricular stimulation. The curvesbecame discontinuous in both directions when the basic drivencyclelength was decreased. Tachycardia could only be initiated byatrial premature beats. Ventricular premature beats inducednon-sustained A–V nodal reentry that used an A–Vnodal fast pathway for anterograde conduction, and an A–Vnodal slow pathway for retrograde conduction. Accepting dualpathways in the anterograde and retrograde directions in theA–V node, means that depending upon their electrophysiologicalproperties a large number of combinations of anterograde andretrograde conduction are possible. When more than two A–Vnodal pathways are present, the number of possible combinationswill increase markedly. These considerations are of help inunderstanding electrophysiological findings in patients withA–V nodal tachycardia. They are also useful to explainthe importance of autonomic tone and the results of drug administrationin these patients.     

Simultaneous anterograde fast-slow atrioventricular nodal pathway conduction after procainamide

Three patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiologic studies that included His bundle recordings, incremental atrial and ventricular pacing and extrastimulation before and after intravenous infusion of 500 mg of procainamide. In all three patients the tachycardia was induced during atrial pacing or premature atrial stimulation, or both. Two of the three patients had discontinuous atrioventricular (A-V) nodal curves with induction of a slow-fast tachycardia during failure in anterograde fast pathway conduction and one patient had a smooth A-V nodal curve with induction of a slow-fast tachycardia at critical A-H interval delays. After procainamide: (1) in all three patients atrial pacing induced A-V nodal Wenckebach periodicity (cycle length 300 to 400 ms) resulting in simultaneous anterograde fast and slow pathway conduction (one atrial beat resulting in two QRS complexes) and retrograde fast pathway conduction initiating an echo response or a slow-fast tachycardia, or both; (2) in all three patients there was enhanced conduction and shortening of refractoriness of the anterograde fast pathway and depressed conduction and lengthening of refractoriness of the retrograde fast pathway; and (3) in two patients there was inability to sustain tachycardia because of selective block within the retrograde fast pathway. In conclusion: (1) procainamide altered conduction and refractoriness of the anterograde fast and slow pathways so that simultaneous conduction could occur during atrial pacing, resulting in a double ventricular response and a slow-fast echo or tachycardia, or both; and (2) the differential effects of procainamide on anterograde fast and retrograde fast pathways suggests two functional A-V nodal fast pathways, one for anterograde and the other for retrograde conduction.     

Effect of verapamil on retrograde conduction in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Using His bundle electrograms, incremental ventricular pacing and the ventricular extrastimulus (V2) technique, the effects of intravenous verapamil, 0.2 mg/kg, on retrograde atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction during ventricular pacing, premature ventricular stimulation (H2A2 interval) and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (H-Ae interval) were evaluated in 11 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. During the control study, SVT could be induced in all 11 patients. After verapamil administration, SVT or atrial echo beats could be induced in 5 patients. Verapamil produced ventriculoatrial (VA) block at a longer cycle length than that during the control study in 10 of 11 patients (295 +/- 27 vs 352 +/- 40 ms, p less than 0.01), but prolonged H2A2 interval in only 5 of 11 patients (37 +/- 6 vs 60 +/- 31 ms, p less than 0.05). In all 5 patients with persistence of inducible SVT or atrial echo beats after verapamil treatment, the H-Ae interval remained unchanged even though in 4 of these 5 patients VA conduction time or H2A2 interval was prolonged. Correlation between the paced cycle length which induced VA block, the shortest V1H2 interval achieved during premature ventricular stimulation and the cycle length of SVT revealed that in all instances in which verapamil induced VA block at a longer cycle length than in controls but did not prolong H2A2 or H-Ae interval, the shortest V1H2 interval and the cycle length of SVT (H-H interval) were significantly longer than the ventricular paced cycle length which produced VA block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Initiation of two distinct forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation in man

Of 42 patients with supraventricular tachycardia related to dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathway conduction, 8 had sustained tachycardia induced during programmed ventricular stimulation. The characteristics of the tachycardia in three patients suggested that the A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia used a slow pathway for anterograde conduction and a fast pathway for retrograde conduction (slow-fast form). In these patients, the retrograde effective refractory period was longer in the slow than in the fast pathway. Ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction curves (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) were smooth. Ventricular premature beats, being conducted retrograde over the fast pathway, could activate the slow pathway in an anterograde direction, initiating the slow-fast form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia. In the remaining five patients, the tachycardia used a fast pathway for anterograde conduction and a slow pathway for retrograde conduction (fast-slow form). In these patients, the retrograde effective refractory period was longer in the fast than in the slow pathway. V-A conduction curves (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) could be either smooth or discontinuous if there was a sudden increase in V-A conduction time. Ventricular premature beats, conducted retrograde over the slow pathway, could activate the fast pathway in an anterograde direction, establishing a tachycardia circuit in reverse of the slow-fast form. In both groups of patients, the ventricular pacing cycle length appeared to be a crucial factor in the ability to expose functional discordance between the two A-V nodal pathways during retrograde conduction.The fast-slow form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, similar to the slow-fast form, could also be induced during atrial premature stimulation in two patients. In this situation, the slow pathway having an anterograde effective refractory period longer, than that of the fast pathway was a requisite condition; anterograde A-V nodal conduction curves (A₁-A₂, H₁-H₂) were smooth. Atrial premature beats, conducted anterograde over the fast pathway, could activate the slow pathway in a retrograde direction resulting In an atrial echo or sustained fast-slow form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Determinants of tachycardia induction using ventricular stimulation in dual pathway atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Factors determining tachycardia induction using ventricular stimulation in atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing the slow pathway for anterograde and the fast pathway for retrograde conduction were analyzed in 53 patients. Sixteen patients had tachycardia induced by ventricular stimulation. In 15, tachycardia was inducible with incremental ventricular pacing. In 4 of these 15 patients, the tachycardia was also induced with V1V2 testing, while in 11 patients, the tachycardia was not induced with V1V2 testing. In 9 of the latter 11 patients, tachycardia could be induced with V1V2V3 testing, suggesting that the retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) of the right bundle (RB) or the relative refractory period of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) was the limiting factor for tachycardia induction during V1V2 testing. In the remaining one patient, tachycardia was induced with V1V2V3 testing, which provoked a premature ventricular beat, leading to tachycardia induction. Tachycardia was not induced by ventricular stimulation in 37 patients. Factors deterring tachycardia induction in these patients may be related to the retrograde ERP or functional refractory period (FRP) of the HPS, the retrograde ERP of the fast pathway, and an insufficient conduction delay of the circuit (retrograde fast and anterograde slow pathway) to allow anterograde conduction of the slow pathway. In conclusion, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia can be induced by ventricular stimulation in approximately 30% of patients with incremental ventricular pacing and/or ventricular extrastimulus testing. Induction of tachycardia with ventricular stimulation, nevertheless, is frequently limited by the retrograde FRP or ERP of the HPS, the retrograde ERP of the fast pathway, and possibly by an insufficient conduction delay of the circuit.     

Transient entrainment and interruption of atrioventricular node tachycardia

The possibility of transiently entraining and interrupting the common type of atrioventricular (AV) node tachycardia (anterograde slow, retrograde fast AV node pathway) was studied using atrial and ventricular pacing in 18 patients with paroxysmal AV node tachycardia. Transient entrainment occurred in all patients. During atrial pacing, localized block in the AV node for one beat followed by anterograde conduction over the fast pathway was observed in three patients. During ventricular pacing, localized block for one beat followed by retrograde conduction over the slow pathway was not observed in any patient. Neither atrial nor ventricular fusion beats were observed during entrainment. These observations indicate in a way not previously shown that reentry involving two functionally dissociated pathways in the AV node is the underlying mechanism of paroxysmal AV node tachycardia. The inability to demonstrate atrial or ventricular fusion beats during entrainment suggests a true intranodal location of the reentrant circuit. Finally, the ability to transiently entrain intranodal tachycardia demonstrates that this electrophysiologic phenomenon is not exclusively limited to macroreentrant circuits.     

Determinants of sustained slow pathway conduction and relation to reentrant tachycardia in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal transmission

In 24 patients with dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways, multiple incremental atrial pacing studies were performed to obtain atrial (A) to His (H) basic driven (A₁ and H₁) and extrastimulus (A₂ and H₂) intervals. Discontinuous A₁-A₂ and H₁-H₂ intervals were analyzed for relations between initial coupling times and subsequent A-H responses, and to examine curves of sequential paced cycle lengths (A-A intervals) versus A-H intervals. Seventeen patients showed sustained slow pathway (SP) conduction with demonstration of discontinuous A-A and A-H curves. Sustained SP conduction occurred at critical atrial paced rates when the first paced beat was blocked in the fast pathway (FP) with conduction via the SP. Eleven of these 17 patients had inducible sustained supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). A-H interval during SVT in these 11 patients was closely related to SP A-H interval during atrial pacing at the paced rate comparable to SVT rate (r = +0.89, p < 0.001). The seven remaining patients showed continuous A-A and A-H curves. In three of these seven patients, sustained SVT was inducible, suggesting ability to sustain SP conduction. All of these three patients had continuous A₁-A₂ and H₁-H₂ curves during sinus rhythm so that the first atrial paced beat could not be blocked in the FP for subsequent SP conduction. In the other four of the remaining seven patients, despite block of the first atrial paced beat in the FP with SP conduction, the second paced beat was blocked in the SP so that all subsequent beats resumed FP conduction. In conclusion, sustalned SP conduction in patients with dual AV nodal pathways requires (1) an initiating beat being blocked in the FP, (2) a critical rate cycle length, and (3) the ability of SP for repetitive conduction at critical rates.     

Limitation of tachycardia zone resulting from longitudinal dissociation of the atrioventricular node in concealed pre-excitation.

Two cases with a concealed left-sided accessory atrioventricular bypass tract are described. In both, functional longitudinal dissociation of the atrioventricular node narrowed the range of atrial premature beat coupling intervals which could initiate re-entry using the accessory pathway. In case 1 early premature atrial beats were followed by an atrioventricular nodal re-entrant echo. The atrial echo pre-empted retrograde conduction over the Kent bundle and thus limited the development of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In case 2 atrioventricular nodal conduction showed typical features ascribed to dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. In addition there was a bradycardia-related retrograde block in the concealed accessory pathway. Early premature atrial beats, because of exclusive "slow pathway" anterograde conduction, arrived at the ventricles during the period of bradycardia-dependent retrograde block and failed to initiate a macro re-entrant tachycardia. This study shows that (1) longitudinal dissociation within the atrioventricular node may limit the ability to initiate tachycardia in patients with concealed pre-excitation; and (2) discontinuous atrioventricular nodal conduction curves occasionally help to reveal bradycardia-related retrograde block in a concealed accessory pathway.     

AV nodal reentrant tachycardia using three different AV nodal pathways

In a patient with frequent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, an electrophysiologic study was performed. Although by programmed atrial stimulation only double AV nodal pathways could be documented, three distinct forms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia could be induced. By programmed atrial stimulation a typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was initiated, by programmed ventricular stimulation, an AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was induced with an antegrade conduction time of 215 ms and a retrograde conduction time of 160 ms. Furthermore, a third form of tachycardia was induced with alternating cycle length due to two different antegrade conduction times, whereas retrograde conduction time was almost identical, irrespective of the antegrade conduction time. The patient received betaxolol (20 mg day-1); during a second electrophysiologic study, the tachycardia could not be induced, and it did not occur spontaneously during a follow-up period of 14 months.     

Incessant supraventricular tachycardia due to upper atrioventricular nodal reentry

Three patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia were presented. Atrial cycle length unchanged during the tachycardia with antegrade Wenckebach AH block was observed. When AH block occurred during tachycardia, the first AH interval was shorter than the subsequent one. The tachycardia was initiated and terminated by atrial extrastimulation beyond the atrial relative refractory period and the atrial activation sequence during the tachycardia was low to high. The induction of tachycardia was dependent on a critical AH interval. Ventriculoatrial conduction was not observed in patient 1 and 2. In patient 3 who had ventriculoatrial conduction, the tachycardia was initiated by the premature ventricular stimulation followed by double atrial response, and the tachycardia was terminated by the ventricular stimulation without atrial capture. In patient 1, verapamil (5 mg) prolonged the atrial cycle length during tachycardia and rapid intravenous injection of adenosine triphosphate (10 mg) terminated the tachycardia. Oral diltiazem (180 mg/day) suppressed the tachycardia in patients 2 and 3. These findings suggest that the mechanism of the tachycardia may be fast-slow type of AV nodal reentry in the upper portion of the AV node and this type of arrhythmia has a tendency to be incessant.     

Usefulness of isoproterenol in facilitating atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia during electrophysiologic testing

In some patients with documented atrioventricular (AV) nodal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), the arrhythmia is not inducible during a standard stimulation protocol. In these patients the level of sympathetic activity may be an important factor. This study evaluates the influence of isoproterenol on anterograde and retrograde pathway properties in patients with AV nodal SVT and the mechanism by which this SVT is facilitated. Group 1 consisted of 8 consecutive patients, ages 23 to 85 years (mean +/- standard error, 57 +/- 8) who had no inducible AV nodal SVT during electrophysiologic testing until isoproterenol (0.5 to 3.0 micrograms/min) was infused. These patients were compared with 6 patients in the same age range (45 to 78 years, mean +/- standard error, 64 +/- 5) who had inducible AV nodal SVT without isoproterenol and who comprised group 2. In comparing group 1 (before isoproterenol) with group 2, there was no significant difference in the refractory periods of the anterograde slow and fast pathways, although the anterograde block cycle length was longer in group 1 patients (421 +/- 18 vs 362 +/- 14 ms, p less than 0.05). The retrograde block cycle length was also longer in 7 of the 8 group 1 (before isoproterenol) patients in whom it could be measured versus those in group 2 (411 +/- 14 vs 318 +/- 27 ms, p less than 0.05). During isoproterenol, the anterograde and retrograde block cycle lengths in group 1 were not different from group 2. Therefore, AV nodal SVT may not be inducible in some patients during routine electrophysiologic testing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Maturational atrioventricular nodal physiology in the mouse

INTRODUCTION: Dual AV nodal physiology is characterized by discontinuous conduction from the atrium to His bundle during programmed atrial extrastimulus testing (A2V2 conduction curves), AV nodal echo beats, and induction of AV nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo murine maturational AV nodal conduction properties and determine the frequency of dual AV nodal physiology and inducible AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A complete transvenous in vivo electrophysiologic study was performed on 30 immature and 19 mature mice. Assessment of AV nodal conduction included (1) surface ECG and intracardiac atrial and ventricular electrograms; (2) decremental atrial pacing to the point of Wenckebach block and 2:1 conduction; and (3) programmed premature atrial extrastimuli to determine AV effective refractory periods (AVERP), construct A2V2 conduction curves, and attempt arrhythmia induction. The mean Wenckebach block interval was 73 +/- 12 msec, 2:1 block pacing cycle length was 61 +/- 11 msec, and mean AVERP100 was 54 +/- 11 msec. The frequency of dual AV nodal physiology increased with chronologic age, with discontinuous A2V2 conduction curves or AV nodal echo beats in 27% of young mice < 8 weeks and 58% in adult mice (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that mice, similar to humans, have maturation of AV nodal physiology, but they do not have inducible AVNRT. Characterization of murine electrophysiology may be of value in studying genetically modified animals with AV conduction abnormalities. Furthermore, extrapolation to humans may help explain the relative rarity of AVNRT in the younger pediatric population.     

Simultaneous antegrade dual AV node conduction initiates AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (a rare initiation mechanism)

Typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia among adults. The concept of dual pathway physiology remains widely accepted, although this physiology likely results from the functional properties of anisotropic tissue within the triangle of Koch, rather than anatomically distinct tracts of conduction. AVNRT is typically induced with anterograde block over the fast pathway and conduction over the slow pathway, with subsequent retrograde conduction over the fast pathway. On rare occasions, anterograde AV node conduction occurs simultaneously through fast and slow pathways resulting in two ventricular beats in response to one atrial beat. We report a case of AVNRT where the tachycardia is always induced by the same mechanism described above. Successful ablation was achieved by slow pathway modification.     

Retrograde dual atrioventricular nodal pathways

Thirty-one (3.5 percent) of 887 studied patients had retrograde dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathways, as manifested by discontinuous retrograde A-V nodal conduction curves (29 patients) or by two sets of ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction intervals at the same paced cycle length (2 patients). All patients had A-V nodal reentrant ventricular echoes of the unusual variety induced with ventricular stimulation (25 patients had single, 2 patients had double and 4 patients had more than three ventricular echoes). The weak link of the reentrant circuit was always the retrograde slow pathway. Eleven of the 31 patients also had anterograde dual A-V nodal pathways (bidirectional dual pathways). Eight patients (26 percent) had spontaneous as well as inducible A-V nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (of the unusual type in three and the usual type in five). In addition, three patients (10 percent) had only inducible supraventricular tachycardia (two of the unusual and one of the usual type).Retrograde dual A-V nodal pathways are uncommon. They are associated with the finding of at least single A-V nodal reentrant ventricular echoes (all patients), anterograde dual pathways (one third of patients) and A-V nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia of the usual or unusual variety (one third of patients).     

Mechanisms underlying the reentrant circuit of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in isolated canine atrioventricular nodal preparation using optical mapping

The reentrant pathways underlying different types of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia have not yet been elucidated. This study was performed to optically map Koch's triangle and surrounding atrial tissue in an isolated canine AV nodal preparation. Multiple preferential AV nodal input pathways were observed in all preparations (n=22) with continuous (73%, n=16) and discontinuous (27%, n=6) AV nodal function curves (AVNFCs). AV nodal echo beats (EBs) were induced in 54% (12/22) of preparations. The reentrant circuit of the slow/fast EB (36%, n=8) started as a block in fast pathway (FP) and a delay in slow pathway (SP) conduction to the compact AV node, then exited from the AV node to the FP, and rapidly returned to the SP through the atrial tissue located at the base of Koch's triangle. The reentrant circuit of the fast/slow EB (9%, n=2) was in an opposite direction. In the slow/slow EB (9%, n=2), anterograde conduction was over the intermediate pathway (IP) and retrograde conduction was over the SP. Unidirectional conduction block occurred at the junction between the AV node and its input pathways. Conduction over the IP smoothed the transition from the FP to the SP, resulting in a continuous AVNFC. A "jump" in AH interval resulted from shifting of anterograde conduction from the FP to the SP (n=4) or abrupt conduction delay within the AV node through the FP (n=2). These findings indicate that (1) multiple AV nodal anterograde pathways exist in all normal hearts; (2) atrial tissue is involved in reentrant circuits; (3) unidirectional block occurs at the interface between the AV node and its input pathways; and (4) the IP can mask the existence of FP and SP, producing continuous AVNFCs.     

Electrophysiologic evidence for selective retrograde utilization of a specialized conducting system in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

In 12 patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant tachycardia, the existence and utilization of retrograde ventriculoatrial bypass tracts in the reentrant process were excluded, and the characteristics of the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuits were studied using His bundle electrograms, incremental atrial and ventricular pacing and atrial and ventricular extrastimulus techniques before and after the administration of 0.01 mg/kg of intravenous ouabain. Similar studies were also performed in five control patients without tachycardia. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia could be induced in all 12 patients during atrial pacing-induced A-V nodal Wenckebach periods or premature atrial stimulation, or both. On the basis of conduction time in the retrograde limb during tachycardia and during retrograde studies, two groups were identified. Group I (seven patients) had (1) short (39 ± 10 msec) and constant conduction time in the retrogarde limb measured from the anterograde His bundle deflection to the retrograde atrial echo response (H-Ae interval), (2) no change in ventriculoatrial conduction time up to maximal ventricular pacing rates, (3) H₂-A₂ intervals during retrograde refractory period studies that were identical to the H-Ae intervals and that did not increase with decreasing V₁-V₂ intervals, and (4) increased conduction time of the anterograde limb (Ae-H intervals) after the administration of ouabain without any effect on retrograde limb conduction (H-Ae and H₂-A₂ intervals) and refractoriness. Group II (five patients) had (1) long and variable H-Ae intervals (60 to 180 msec), (2) a progressive increase in ventriculoatrial intervals during incremental ventricular pacing, (3) an increase in H₂-A₂ intervals in response to decreasing V₁-V₂ intervals, and (4) increased anterograde (Ae-H interval) and retrograde limb (H-Ae and H₂-A₂ intervals) conduction and refractoriness after the administration of ouabain. Changes in the H₂-A₂ interval corresponded to the changes in four of the five control patients. These findings suggest that (1) in group I the anterograde limb was the A-V node, whereas the retrograde limb was an A-V nodal bypass tract or an insulated intranodal tract physiologically unlike the A-V node; and (2) in group II the A-V node comprised both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuit.     

Procainamide and retrograde atrioventricular nodal conduction in man

Recent studies that show a depressant effect of procainamide (PA) on retrograde conduction in patients with atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (RT) have suggested possible incorporation of AV nodal bypass tracts. Electrophysiologic effects of i.v. PA, 10 mg/kg, on retrograde AV nodal conduction were examined in 13 patients without RT, demonstrable AV nodal refractory period curves, or accessory pathways. Ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction was recorded before and after PA using intracardiac electrograms, incremental ventricular pacing and extrastimulation. With incremental pacing during the control, VA block occurred at a mean cycle length (CL) of 364.6 +/- 87.9 msec. After PA, VA conduction was abolished in five of 13 patients due to onset of retrograde block in the AV node; in seven of 13, VA block occurred at a longer paced CL after PA (344.2 +/- 51.2 msec vs 477.1 +/- 93.2 msec). In one patient, PA did not affect VA conduction. PA invariably produced prolongation in the VA interval at comparable CL of pacing. With ventricular premature stimulation, the retrograde H2A2 intervals during the control period were short (less than 50 msec) in seven of 13, intermediate (60-100 msec) in three of 13 and long (greater than 100 msec) in three of 13 cases. PA either abolished H2A2 conduction (H2 but no A2) or prolonged the H2A2 intervals by 5-20 msec in most cases in this series. The data suggest that i.v. PA almost uniformly depresses retrograde AV nodal conduction in the intact human heart. This depressant response to PA is not indicative of presence of partial or complete AV nodal bypass tracts.     

Electrophysiologic study demonstrating triple antegrade AV nodal pathways in patients with spontaneous and/or induced supraventricular tachycardia

Ten patients are described with two discrete discontinulties in AV nodal conduction curves suggesting triple antegrade AV nodal pathways. This represents approximately 6% of patients seen in this laboratory with dual AV nodal pathways. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 63 (mean ± Sd, 48 ± 15 years). Six of the 10 patients had organic heart disease and four did not. The effect of cycle length on triple pathways could be analyzed in 8 of 10 patients who had atrial extrastimulus testing at two or more cycle lengths. Three of these eight patients had triple pathways at all tested cycle lengths. Four patients had triple pathways only at shorter cycle lengths. One patient had triple pathways only at longer cycle lengths. Intact retrograde conduction was demonstrated in seven of ten patients, all of whom had atrial echoes (two patients) or inducible supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (five patients). Echoes or SVT were induced on the slow pathway is all seven patients, but also on the intermediate pathway in three. However, sustained SVT usually reflected antegrade slow and retrograde fast pathway conduction. In conclusion. triple AV nodal pathways may be demonstrated in occasional patients during atrial extrastimulus testing. Thereby, functional longitudinal dissociation of the AV node is not limited to two pathways.     

Verapamil-mediated atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and the uncovering of dual-pathway AV nodal conduction

In a 67-year-old man with multiple myocardial infarctions in the past, the use of oral verapamil for control of angina pectoris was followed by the appearance of two previously undiagnosed abnormalities, namely, a dual-pathway AV node conduction pattern, and paroxysms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia precipitated by premature ventricular beats (PVB). It is probable that the differential effects of verapamil on the fast and slow AV node pathways, and the interplay of PVB with its concealment within the AV node, created the necessary circumstances in the AV node to precipitate the tachycardia. Observed off verapamil over several months, the patient remained in normal sinus rhythm but continued to have numerous premature ventricular beats (PVB's). Nevertheless, neither the clinical electrocardiographic features of dual-pathway AV node conduction nor the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia could be found. The proarrhythmic effect of verapamil and its ability to provoke the very arrhythmia against which it is most effective are of particular interest in view of a similar behavior exhibited by the Class I antiarrhythmic agents.     

Quintuple pathways participating in three distinct types of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in a patient with recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Sinus and paced atrial beats had QRS complexes characteristic of atrioventricular (A-V) conduction through a manifest left lateral accessory pathway (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, type A). Three distinct types of A-V reciprocating tachycardia and three different modes of retrograde atrial activation were demonstrated. Type 1 tachycardia involved the slow A-V nodal pathway and a second (left lateral or left paraseptal) accessory A-V pathway capable of retrograde conduction only. Type 2 tachycardia was of the slow-fast A-V nodal pathway type. Type 3 tachycardia involved a heretofore undescribed circuit in that retrograde conduction occurred through an accessory A-V pathway with long retrograde conduction times and anterograde conduction through both the manifest left lateral accessory A-V pathway and fast A-V nodal pathway. Premature ventricular beats delivered late in the cycle of this tachycardia advanced (but did not change) the retrograde atrial activity without affecting the timing of the corresponding anterograde H deflection. In summary, this patient had five (three accessory and two intranodal) pathways participating in three different types of A-V reciprocating tachycardia; the recurrence of these were prevented with oral amiodarone therapy.