Comparison of verapamil and nifedipine in the treatment of variant angina pectoris: Preliminary observations in 10 patients

To assess the relative efficacy of verapamil, nifedlpine and placebo in the therapy of patients with variant angina pectoris, 10 such patients (6 men and 4 women, average age 52 years) were treated for 2 month periods with verapamil (mean ± standard deviation 400 ± 80 mg/day in three to six equal doses; range 240 to 480 mg/day), nifediplne (82 ± 31 mg/day in four to six equal doses; range 40 to 160 mg/day) and placebo. Eight of the 10 patients were maintained throughout the study on a stable regimen of oral isosorbide dinitrate (137 ± 56 mg/day in four to six equal doses; range 40 to 200 mg/day). Before the study, all underwent cardiac catheterization: eight had no fixed coronary artery disease, one had single vessel and one had triple vessel disease. Two patients had been resuscitated from sudden cardiac death before the study. Each patient underwent calibrated two channel ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring for 24 hours during each week of the study.

During each 2 month period, the following data were quantitated: (1) chest pains per week, (2) nitroglycerin tablets used per week, (3) required hospitalizations for clinical instability, (4) adverse effects, and (5) episodes of transient S-T segment deviation on ambulatory monitoring. The number of chest pains per week, the number of nttroglycerin tablets used per week and the number of transient S-T segment deviations on calibrated two channel ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring were similar during treatment with verapamil and nifedipine and less than with placebo. Hospitalization for clinical instability was required in two patients taking placebo and in two taking nifedipine; no patient required hospitalization during treatment with verapamil. Verapamil caused mild constipation in two patients, sinus nodal pauses in one patient and palpitations in one; none of these effects forced a discontinuation or substantial reduction in dosage. In contrast, the dosage of nifedipine was reduced because of induced orthostatic hypotension in two patients, marked pedal edema in one patient and nausea, anorexia and nonorthostatic dizziness in three. Thus verapamil and nifedipine showed similar efficacy in the treatment of variant angina, although nifedipine was associated with more substantial adverse effects than either placebo or verapamil in this small number of patients.     

Nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate alone and in combination for patients with chronic stable angina: a double-blind crossover study

Since not all patients tolerate beta-blockers, the efficacy of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate was evaluated alone and in combination in patients with stable angina pectoris. The study was a randomized double-blind crossover design with patients titrated to maximally tolerated doses of both drugs. Phases included isosorbide dinitrate alone, nifedipine alone, and isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine in combination, with efficacy determined by stress testing. Eleven men and one woman patient with a mean age of 60 years and a mean of five anginal episodes/week completed the study. Patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes I, II, and III. With nifedipine alone compared with isosorbide dinitrate alone, patients had fewer angina attacks/week (p less than 0.02), exercised longer before experiencing angina (p less than 0.03), and had less ST segment depression during (p less than 0.03) or after (p less than 0.05) exercise. When patients received isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine, only time to onset of angina during exercise (p less than 0.05) was significantly different from the response with isosorbide dinitrate alone. Analysis of variance between nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine was not significant. Diastolic blood pressure with isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine (p less than 0.04) was lower than with isosorbide dinitrate alone. No significant differences in systolic blood pressure were noted between the treatment groups. The drugs alone and in combination were relatively well tolerated. Nifedipine alone may be superior to isosorbide dinitrate alone. The combination of isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine demonstrated no advantage over nifedipine alone compared with isosorbide dinitrate alone.     

Randomized double-blind comparison of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate in patients with coronary arterial spasm

The effects of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate on the frequency of angina and consumption of nitroglycerin were studied in 19 patients with coronary arterial spasm. After a lead-in phase, the patients were randomized to treatment with either nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate. After dose titration (40 to 120 mg/day) and evaluation, they were given the alternate therapy. During the initial segment of the double-blind phase, one patient died suddenly (nifedipine phase), one dropped out of the study (nifedpine phase) and another was unable to tolerate therapy (isosorbide dinitrate phase). In the other 16 patients, the mean frequency of angina was less during therapy with both nifedipine (0.69 episode/day, p < 0.05) and isosorbide dinitrate (0.77 episode/day, p < 0.05) phases than during the lead-in phase (1.71 episodes/day). The mean frequency of angina was similar in the nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate phases. A 50 percent or greater decrease in frequency of angina compared with lead-in phase values occurred in 13 of 18 patients during treatment with nifedipine and in 10 of 16 during treatment with isosorbide dinitrate. Of the 16 patients who completed both double-blind phases, 7 showed greater improvement (that is, a 50 percent or greater decrease in frequency of angina) with nifedipine than with isosorbide dinitrate); 6 others showed greater improvement with isosorbide dinitrate, and the other 3 had a less than 50 percent difference in frequency of angina with the two drugs. These findings in a limited number of patients suggest that both nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate are effective in certain patients with coronary spasm but that neither drug is clearly superior.     

Long-term follow-up of verapamil and nitrate treatment for coronary artery spasm

Thirty-seven patients with coronary artery spasm and minor coronary atherosclerosis (34) or normal coronary arteries (3) were followed up long-term. All had angina at rest, 32 had nocturnal angina, and 13 had a positive exercise test with S-T elevation. Three had a previous subendocardial infarction; 10 had had serious arrhythmias, which caused syncope in 7. At last review, 21 months (range 1 to 61) after starting therapy, 27 patients continued on verapamil, 314 (120 to 600) mg/day; 4 who did not respond to verapamil were taking nifedipine, 58 (30 to 80) mg/day; and 16 were also taking isosorbide dinitrate, 41 (20 to 80) mg/day. Of the 31 patients on therapy, 21 were asymptomatic, 9 were improved (1 to 4 attacks/month), and 1 had an average of 8 anginal attacks/month; the remaining 6 had stopped therapy and 5 were asymptomatic a mean of 10 (3 to 18) months after stopping. The exercise test became negative in all 12 patients tested on therapy, although 3 required nitrates in addition to verapamil or nifedipine.In 26 supervised treatment withdrawals in the hospital, a mean of 15 (1 to 55) months on therapy, 10 developed angina in less than 48 hours. Angina recurred in all 6 unsupervised, patient-initiated withdrawals. Failure to stop smoking was positively associated with recurrence of angina on treatment withdrawal (p < 0.02).Long-term treatment of coronary artery spasm with verapamil or nifedipine together with isosorbide dinitrate was well tolerated and effectively relieved angina. No documented serious arrhythmias, syncopal episodes, myocardial infarction, or death occurred during follow-up.     

Evaluation using serial exercise tests of verapamil alone and combined with isosorbide dinitrate in exertional angina

The response to verapamil alone and combined with isosorbide dinitrate in a group of 12 patients with severe ischemic heart disease and stable effort angina was assessed by means of serial treadmill testing. The study was randomized, of a square latin design and double-blind. The tested drugs and dosages were 120 mg of verapamil, 120 mg of verapamil plus 20 mg of isosorbide dinitrate and placebo. Patients were serially tested (Bruce protocol) over three consecutive days at 8-9-12 and 16 hours. A significative improvement was observed in several ischemic parameters both with verapamil alone and combined with isosorbide dinitrate, but this improvement was remarkably enhanced with the combination of drugs. The mean exercise time to produce angina improved from 268 +/- 18 sec (basal) to 379 +/- 19 sec (verapamil plus isosorbide dinitrate) and the time for 1 mm ST segment depression from 163 +/- 22 sec (basal) to 257 +/- 19 sec (verapamil plus isosorbide dinitrate) when measured at the last daily test (8 hours after drug administration). It is concluded that both verapamil alone and combined with isosorbide dinitrate at the chosen doses are clinically efficient, significantly improving the ischemic parameters. The combination of verapamil and isosorbide dinitrate resulted in a remarkably better improvement in this group of patients with stable effort angina.     

Assessment of antianginal efficacy of long-acting sustained release isosorbide dinitrate in comparison with short-acting isosorbide dinitrate.

A quadruple blind randomized cross-over study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of twice a day long acting sustained release isosorbide dinitrate (SRISDN) in comparison with 4 times daily of the short acting isosorbide dinitrate in 18 patients with stable angina pectoris (NYHA class II-III) with a positive exercise treadmill test. The antianginal effect of sustained release isosorbide dinitrate (SRISDN) (exercise duration 472.61 +/- 112.49 sec and anginal episodes per week (1.33 +/- 1.18) was not significantly different (p less than 0.05) when compared to conventional isosorbide dinitrate (exercise duration 468.33 +/- 135.28 sec and anginal episodes per week 1.55 +/- 104). Twice a day long acting sustained release isosorbide dinitrate is as effective as four times a day conventional short acting isosorbide dinitrate. Such a regimen is likely to lead to a better patient compliance and ease of antianginal therapy.     

Double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of propranolol and verapamil in the treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris

This study was performed to compare the relative efficacies of propranolol and verapamil in patients with stable angina pectoris. In 18 patients (16 men, two women, mean age 58 years) with coronary artery disease and angina of effort, the results of low (40 mg every 6 hours) and high-dose (80 mg every 6 hours) propranolol therapy were compared to those of low (80 mg every 6 hours) and high-dose (120 mg every 6 hours) verapamil therapy in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation which lasted eight weeks: two weeks of placebo therapy, two weeks of propranolol or verapamil (one week low-dose, one week high-dose) therapy, three days of down-titration followed by one week of placebo therapy, two weeks of propranolol or verapamil therapy (whichever was not given earlier in the trial) (one week low-dose, one week high-dose) and three days of down-titration. During each period the following were quantitated: (1) chest pains/week; (2) nitroglycerin used/week; (3) transient ischemic S-T segment deviations and highest grade of ventricular ectopic activity on two-channel Holter monitor; (4) S-T segment deviations during supine bicycle exercise; (5) left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction at rest and during exercise (assessed by equilibrium gated blood pool scintigraphy); and (6) pulmonary function studies. Propranolol and high-dose verapamil therapy significantly reduced the frequency of angina, and high-dose verapamil therapy diminished both the need for nitroglycerin and the frequency of transient ischemic S-T segment deviations on Holter monitor. Neither agent exerted a clinically-important deleterious influence on left ventricular volumes or the ejection fraction. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume were worsened by propranolol but not by verapamil. Thus, in the patient with angina of effort, verapamil is a satisfactory therapeutic alternative to propranolol.     

Randomized double-blind comparison of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate therapy in variant angina pectoris due to coronary artery spasm

Twelve patients were entered prospectively into a randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in the treatment of variant angina pectoris due to coronary artery spasm. Using the diary technique, both anginal episodes and nitroglycerin tablets consumed were recorded during the pretrial, no drug period, and both active drug phases. During the baseline pretrial period, an average of 1.1 anginal episodes/day occurred with reduction to 0.28/day during nifedipine treatment and 0.39/day during ISDN treatment. Headache was the major side effect during ISDN treatment, occurring in 9 of 11 (81%) patients; and nonheart failure related pedal edema during nifedipine treatment, occurring in 4 of 12 (33%) patients. Intolerable side effects necessitating cessation of treatment occurred in two patients during nifedipine treatment and in three patients during ISDN treatment. Patients preferred nifedipine over ISDN because of increased efficacy and fewer uncomfortable side effects. We conclude that both nifedipine and ISDN are effective therapy for coronary spasm, but that nifedipine was more effective and was preferred by the majority of patients.     

Effects of Amlodipine and Isosorbide Dinitrate on Exercise-Induced and Ambulatory Ischemia in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris

This study was designed to compare once-daily administration of 5–10 mg amlodipine with two daily doses of 40 mg sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate in 59 patients with stable angina using a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design. Anginal episodes, nitroglycerin consumption, and possible adverse events were recorded in a diary. A maximal symptom-limited bicycle exercise test and 48-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring were performed at baseline and at the end of each 5-week period of therapy. Exercise time, time to angina, time to ST depression, and maximal ST depression were measured during exercise. During ambulatory monitoring, the number of ischemic episodes and the duration per hour of ST depression were assessed. Amlodipine significantly reduced anginal episodes (P < 0.001) when compared with isosorbide dinitrate. Furthermore, amlodipine prolonged time to ST depression (P < 0.001) and time to angina (P < 0.05) when compared with isosorbide dinitrate. The number and duration of ischemic episodes during ambulatory monitoring were significantly reduced with amlodipine when compared with baseline values (P < 0.05), whereas no differences were found between isosorbide dinitrate and baseline. Adverse events were reported more frequently with isosorbide dinitrate than with amlodipine (P < 0.02). Amlodipine appears to be more effective and tolerable than sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate as monotherapy for chronic stable angina. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Nifedipine and propranolol: A beneficial drug interaction

The antianginal effects of two active drugs, nifedipine and propranolol, alone and in combination, were compared with those of placebo in a double-blind clinical trial that included 16 patients with chronic stable angina triggered by exertion. A low dose and a high dose of the active drugs were used (nifedipine, 30 and 60 mg/day; propranolol, 240 and 280 mg/day). Precordial exercise mapping and continuous electrocardiographic recordings were used to assess objective response to therapy, and the patients were asked to keep a diary of episodes of chest pain and consumption of nitroglycerin tablets for subjective appraisal. Both frequency of chest pain and nitroglycerin consumption were significantly reduced by each of the active drugs when compared with placebo, and the combination of nifedipine and propranolol added significantly to the effectiveness. Reductions in area of ischemia and number of episodes of ST segment depression on 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring corroborated the efficacy of each active treatment with respect to placebo. Nearly 60 percent of all episodes of ST segment depression were painless and responded to the active treatment in the same manner as did the episodes associated with chest pain. Side effects were mild and all treatments were well tolerated. The objective methods used allowed for clear-cut differentiation of treatment effects with the various regimens. Although the two drugs alone were significantly more effective than placebo, their combination provided an even greater improvement (p < 0.005), and therefore it appears to be a safe and effective form of treatment for chronic stable angina.     

Cardiorespiratory effects of isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine in combination with nadolol: A double-blind comparative study of beneficial and adverse antianginal drug interactions

Combinations of 2 or 3 drugs are often used to treat angina pectoris, but their combined cardiorespiratory effects have not been investigated. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol, the effects of nadolol alone and nadolol in combination with isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine were compared, in low and high doses, on antianginal efficacy, respiratory functions and arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO₂) in 19 patients with stable angina pectoris. A complete assessment including a bicycle exercise test with the measurement of the sum of ST-segment depression in all leads (2ST) was carried out every 2 weeks. The frequency of anginal attacks and nitroglycerin consumption was reduced significantly (p < 0.001) by nadolol alone and in combination with the other drugs. Nadolol caused a slight reduction in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, which was improved by isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine. The ∑ST profile (basal, at peak exercise and 2 and 5 minutes after exercise) was decreased by nadolol alone and in combination with the other drugs, although the greatest reduction was achieved with large doses of nifedipine and nadolol. The rest and postexercise SaO₂ decreased after nadolol alone and in combination with isosorbide dinitrate, but recovered to pretrial values after nifedipine and nadolol. With all drug combinations, ∑ST depression was greater when the postexercise SaO₂ was < 92%, and decreased (p < 0.05) in the same patients when their postexercise SaO₂ was > 92%. Thus, isosorbide dinitrate improved antianginal efficacy of nadolol but decreased SaO₂, which was associated with an increased ∑ST depression. Nifedipine in combination with nadolol increased SaO₂ and significantly decreased ∑ST depression.     

External,noninvasive cardiac assistance and nitrate administration for patients with unstable angina pectoris or acute coronary insufficiency

The influence of external, noninvasive counterpulsation, alone and in combination with sublingual nitroglycerin or isosorbide dinitrate, on left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions was investigated. Patients with unstable angina pectoris or acute coronary insufficiency were selected for this evaluation. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were estimated using a gated blood pool scintigraphic technique. Twenty minutes of external counterpulsation did not significantly alter left ventricular end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes, or ejection fractions in 13 patients. When sublingual isosorbide dinitrate (10 mg.) was combined with 20 minutes of external counterpulsation in eight patients, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes decreased 16 ± 7 per cent (p = .05), but neither left ventricular end-systolic volumes (12 ± 7 per cent) nor ejection fractions were significantly changed. When sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg.) was combined with 15 minutes of external counterpulsation in three patients, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes decreased 21 ± 3 per cent (p < .01), end-systolic volumes decreased 25 ± 4 per cent (p < .02), and ejection fractions were not significantly changed. When left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were measured 30 and 65 minutes after isosorbide dinitrate administration, 10 and 45 minutes after cessation of external counterpulsation, respectively, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes and end-systolic volumes were significantly decreased by approximately 20 per cent while ejection fractions were unchanged. When left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were measured 25 minutes after nitroglycerin administration, 10 minutes after cessation of external counterpulsation, end-systolic volumes decreased 23 ± 2 per cent (p < .005) and end-diastolic volumes decreased 27 ± 3 per cent (p < .005). No significant changes in left ventricular end-diastolic or end-systolic volumes were seen 60 minutes after nitroglycerin administration. As in the other studies, left ventricular ejection fractions were unchanged. The results suggest that relatively short periods of external, noninvasive cardiac assistance do not alter left ventricular volumes or ejection fractions in patients with unstable angina pectoris or acute coronary insufficiency. Although external counterpulsation combined with a vasodilator such as isosorbide dinitrate or nitroglycerin decreases left ventricular volumes, it offers no advantage over vasodilator treatment alone.     

Diltiazem, nifedipine, and their combination in patients with stable angina pectoris: effects on angina, exercise tolerance, and the ambulatory electrocardiographic ST segment

The efficacy and safety of oral nifedipine and diltiazem were compared in 20 patients with stable angina pectoris with use of a placebo run-in, randomized, double-blind titration to maximal effect crossover protocol. The effects of treatment withdrawal were also analyzed. All patients received placebo for 2 weeks and were then randomly assigned to receive either diltiazem or nifedipine. A 2 week drug titration phase in which patients received either diltiazem (180 to 360 mg/day) or nifedipine (30 to 120 mg/day) in three divided doses was followed by a 1 week maintenance phase. Patients then received placebo for 1 to 2 weeks, followed by crossover to the other treatment regimen and a second placebo washout period of 1 week. Patients (n = 13) who remained symptomatic on both diltiazem and nifedipine during the monotherapy periods entered a 3 week combination treatment phase, followed by a final 1 week placebo washout period. Frequency of angina, nitroglycerin consumption, exercise tolerance (Naughton protocol), and frequency of daily episodes of ST segment deviations on the electrocardiogram (1 mm of ST segment depression persisting for at least 1 min with and without chest pain) on an ambulatory electrocardiographic monitor were assessed during the baseline placebo, active monotherapy, placebo withdrawal, and combination treatment phases. Plasma drug levels were also measured. Compared with initial placebo values, the frequency of angina and the amount of nitroglycerin treatment were reduced by both diltiazem (p less than .001) and nifedipine (p less than .02). Diltiazem was more effective than nifedipine in reducing angina (p less than .02). Exercise duration increased with both drugs (p less than .0001). Diltiazem was significantly better than nifedipine in reducing the episodes of ST segment depression on the ambulatory monitor (p less than .01). Diltiazem reduced the resting heart rate (p less than .01); both drugs reduced the resting blood pressure and rate-pressure product. Overall, combination therapy was more effective in patients who did not maximally respond to diltiazem or nifedipine alone with respect to anginal and exercise variables and in reducing blood pressure at rest and during exercise. Plasma drug levels could not predict an individual patient's treatment response. Diltiazem may increase nifedipine drug levels when the drugs are combined. Fewer side effects were observed with diltiazem than nifedipine; the most side effects were seen with combination treatment. There were no apparent withdrawal effects observed with either treatment regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Abrupt cessation of short-term continuous treatment with isosorbide dinitrate may cause a rebound increase in silent myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable angina pectoris.

OBJECTIVE: To examine by Holter electrocardiographic monitoring the effect of abruptly stopping nitrate treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris. PATIENTS: 12 men with confirmed ischaemic heart disease and stable exertional class 3 angina (Canadian). All had episodes of horizontal or down sloping ST segment depression during 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring. All were nitrate responders. DESIGN: Each patient was given isosorbide dinitrate (10-30 mg four times a day) and placebo (four times a day) for three days in a randomised crossover trial. There was a washout period of 3-5 days between the two treatment periods. Holter monitoring was performed on the third day of isosorbide dinitrate and placebo administration and on the first day of their withdrawal. RESULTS: When treatment with isosorbide dinitrate was stopped there was a significant increase in the total number and duration of painless episodes of myocardial ischaemia. During placebo and isosorbide dinitrate administration 8 patients had episodes of painless myocardial ischaemia whereas after isosorbide dinitrate cessation they were recorded in all 12 patients. Episodes of silent myocardial ischaemia at rest appeared in 4 patients after isosorbide dinitrate withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Abrupt cessation of short-term continuous nitrate treatment in patients with severe angina may cause a rebound increase in myocardial ischaemia which is predominantly silent.     

"Maximal" drug therapy is not necessarily optimal in chronic angina pectoris

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents, nitrates and calcium channel antagonists are effective in treating angina pectoris, but much remains unknown about how they act in combination. Consequently, treadmill exercise was used to assess the relative efficacy of nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate, or both, in 19 patients with stable angina receiving propranolol. Propranolol therapy was continued and either placebo, nifedipine (20 mg), isosorbide dinitrate (20 mg) or both drugs were given randomly 1 1/2 hours before exercise in a double-blind trial. In 16 patients who completed the protocol, heart rate at rest during propranolol therapy was 53.7 +/- 1.9 beats/min (mean +/- standard error of the mean); it increased 4.6 +/- 1.2 beats/min with the addition of nifedipine (p less than 0.01), but was unchanged with isosorbide dinitrate or both combined. Compared with values during treatment with propranolol alone, systolic blood pressure at rest decreased with each vasodilator individually and when combined. Rate-pressure product at maximal exercise was the same with all combinations. Exercise duration was 467 +/- 50 seconds with propranolol, increased to 556 +/- 47 seconds with isosorbide dinitrate (p less than 0.05) and to 636 +/- 50 seconds with nifedipine (p less than 0.001). Exercise duration with all three drugs was 597 +/- 47 seconds (p less than 0.01 compared with propranolol alone). The improvement with nifedipine was greater than with isosorbide dinitrate (p less than 0.05) but exercise duration was not significantly different with the combination of these drugs than when either drug was used alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Randomized double-blind comparison of isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine in variant angina pectoris

The antianginal and anti-ischemic effect of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), 120 mg once daily, and nifedipine, 20 mg twice daily, both in slow-release formulations, were compared in 17 patients with variant angina pectoris in a randomized, double-blind trial. The design included a placebo run-in period and two 6-week crossover periods of active treatment. Mean frequency of angina decreased significantly from 43 attacks per week during the placebo period to 4 per week with ISDN and 8 with nifedipine (p < 0.001). Sublingual nitroglycerin consumption decreased significantly from 37 tablets per week with placebo to 3 tablets per week with ISDN and 7 with nifedipine (p < 0.001). Both drugs reduced the silent and symptomatic ST-segment deviations on ambulatory electrocardiographic recording and increased maximal exercise tolerance. Episodes of coronary spasm could be provoked, by hyperventilation, in all patients during the placebo phase but in no patient during therapy with either active drug.Thus, both ISDN and nifedipine, in their slow-release formulations, are effective in the treatment of variant angina pectoris.     

Nifedipine therapy for stable angina pectoris: preliminary results of effects on angina frequency and treadmill exercise response.

Ten patients with stable angina pectoris secondary to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease received nifedipine (10 mg and 20 mg orally three times daily, each for 2 weeks) or placebo (for 2 weeks) in a single-blind manner during a 6 week period. One patient was excluded because nocturnal and resting angina developed while he was receiving placebo. The frequency of anginal attacks in the remaining nine patients decreased from 11.2 ± 2.2 (mean ± standard error of the mean) per patient per week during administration of placebo to 7.1 ± 1.6 during therapy with nifedipine at 10 mg and to 6.3 ±1.7 during administration of 20 mg of nifedipine (P < 0.05 for both doses of active drug versus placebo). Nitroglycerin consumption similarly decreased from 8.9 ± 2.3 tablets per patient per week (placebo) to 4.8 ± 1.4 tablets during administration of 10 mg of nifedipine and to 4.2 ± 1.2 during therapy with 20 mg of the drug (P < 0.05 for both doses of drug versus placebo). Duration of treadmill exercise increased from 368 ± 50 seconds (placebo) to 471 ± 72 seconds at the 10 mg dose of nifedipine and 522 ± 79 seconds at 20 mg (P < 0.05 for both doses versus placebo). Maximal S-T segment shift and product of heart rate × systolic blood pressure did not differ between the placebo period and that of active drug therapy. Treadmill exercise performed during subsequent double-blind, randomized crossover treatment with placebo and nifedipine revealed increased exercise duration after nifedipine therapy (524 ± 49 seconds) compared with that after placebo (462 ± 52 seconds) (P < 0.005) but, again, maximal S-T shift and the product of heart rate × systolic blood pressure did not differ. Side effects from nifedipine were minor and easily tolerable. The results seem to indicate that nifedipine prolongs exercise time by decreasing heart rate × systolic blood pressure product at a given work load, possibly in a manner similar to that of long-acting nitrate therapy.     

Changes in myocardial ischaemia during isosorbide dinitrate or indoramin therapy in patients with stable angina using relations between the ST segment and heart rate

The effect of isosorbide dinitrate or indoramin on myocardial ischaemia was examined in patients with stable angina pectoris. In a prospective trial, randomization resulted in 8 and 9 patients, respectively, given isosorbide dinitrate in a dose of 30–90 mg daily, and indoramin in a dose of 75–225 mg daily; 2 of these patients were serially examined during the two types of therapy. Changes in myocardial ischaemia were assessed by exercise testing using 12 standard electrocardiographic leads and a bipolar lead CM₅. Individual and group comparisons showed that isosorbide dinitrate resulted in an increase in ST segment depression, the maximal ST/heart rate slope and the ratio of net ST segment depression to increases in heart rate (at least P < 0.01). In contrast, with indoramin therapy there were no significant changes in these indices. The results in these patients suggest that isosorbide dinitrate leads more consistently to increases in the severity of myocardial ischaemia than indoramin, although this effect on ischaemia is apparently less than the benefit of these agents on exercise performance.     

Medical treatment of patients with severe exertional and rest angina: double blind comparison of beta blocker, calcium antagonist, and nitrate.

The role of medical treatment of patients who had resting nocturnal angina as well as exertional angina was investigate. The effects of atenolol 100 mg a day, nifedipine 20 mg three times a day, and isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg twice a day were investigated in a double blind, triple dummy randomised study. Nine patients with coronary artery disease, early positive exercise tests, and transient daytime and nocturnal ambulatory ST segment changes were initially assessed off all antianginal medication. They were then treated with each drug for three five day periods. Angina diaries were reviewed and maximal treadmill exercise tests and 48 hour ambulatory ST segment monitoring were performed at the end of each treatment period. Resting and exercise heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower on atenolol than on either isosorbide mononitrate or nifedipine. The duration of exercise to 1 mm ST segment depression was significantly greater on atenolol than on isosorbide mononitrate. Only one patient had an improvement in exercise tolerance on nifedipine that was greater than the improvement on atenolol; this patient had single vessel disease. The total number and duration of episodes of ST segment change during ambulatory monitoring were significantly lower with atenolol than on either isosorbide mononitrate or nifedipine. Nocturnal ST segment changes were abolished in six patients on atenolol, in six patients on nifedipine, and in five patients on isosorbide mononitrate. When nocturnal ST segment changes occurred, their frequency was reduced with all three drugs. Pain was abolished in four patients on atenolol and pain relief was significantly better on atenolol than on isosorbide mononitrate. There was no significant difference in pain relief between isosorbide mononitrate and nifedipine. Thus beta receptor blockade with atenolol was the most effective means of reducing myocardial ischaemia both during exercise and at rest at night without causing deterioration in any patient. Nocturnal myocardial ischaemia in patients with severe coronary artery disease can be effectively treated with beta receptor antagonists and vasodilators.     

Medical treatment of patients with severe exertional and rest angina: double blind comparison of beta blocker, calcium antagonist, and nitrate

The role of medical treatment of patients who had resting nocturnal angina as well as exertional angina was investigate. The effects of atenolol 100 mg a day, nifedipine 20 mg three times a day, and isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg twice a day were investigated in a double blind, triple dummy randomised study. Nine patients with coronary artery disease, early positive exercise tests, and transient daytime and nocturnal ambulatory ST segment changes were initially assessed off all antianginal medication. They were then treated with each drug for three five day periods. Angina diaries were reviewed and maximal treadmill exercise tests and 48 hour ambulatory ST segment monitoring were performed at the end of each treatment period. Resting and exercise heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower on atenolol than on either isosorbide mononitrate or nifedipine. The duration of exercise to 1 mm ST segment depression was significantly greater on atenolol than on isosorbide mononitrate. Only one patient had an improvement in exercise tolerance on nifedipine that was greater than the improvement on atenolol; this patient had single vessel disease. The total number and duration of episodes of ST segment change during ambulatory monitoring were significantly lower with atenolol than on either isosorbide mononitrate or nifedipine. Nocturnal ST segment changes were abolished in six patients on atenolol, in six patients on nifedipine, and in five patients on isosorbide mononitrate. When nocturnal ST segment changes occurred, their frequency was reduced with all three drugs. Pain was abolished in four patients on atenolol and pain relief was significantly better on atenolol than on isosorbide mononitrate. There was no significant difference in pain relief between isosorbide mononitrate and nifedipine. Thus beta receptor blockade with atenolol was the most effective means of reducing myocardial ischaemia both during exercise and at rest at night without causing deterioration in any patient. Nocturnal myocardial ischaemia in patients with severe coronary artery disease can be effectively treated with beta receptor antagonists and vasodilators.